Axillary Dissection vs. no Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Sentinel Lymph Node: A Single Institution Experience

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has been a cornerstone of breast cancer (BC) treatment, traditionally ensuring loco-regional control but associated with significant morbidity. Recent advancements suggest sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) as a less invasive alternative. This review examines the outcomes of omitting ALND in BC patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) undergoing mastectomy. We conducted a comprehensive review of historical comparative studies and pivotal randomized clinical trials. Key sources included the ACOSOG Z0011 and SINODAR-ONE trials, alongside retrospective studies and ongoing trials like SENOMAC and POSNOC. Historical studies predominantly focused on patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery, revealing low recurrence rates and comparable survival outcomes between SLNB alone and ALND. Retrospective analyses of mastectomy patients indicated that omitting ALND did not significantly impact recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS). The SINODAR-ONE trial sub-analysis, involving 218 mastectomy patients, found no significant differences in 5-year OS and RFS between ALND and SLNB groups. The SENOMAC trial similarly showed non-inferior outcomes for mastectomy patients treated without ALND. The ongoing POSNOC trial aims to provide further insights, particularly focusing on the subgroup of mastectomy patients. Emerging evidence supports the feasibility of omitting ALND in BC patients with positive SLNs undergoing mastectomy, potentially reducing surgical morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes. However, further randomized clinical trials are essential to confirm these findings and refine treatment guidelines, ensuring optimal patient care.

The prognostic analysis of further axillary dissection in breast cancer with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes undergoing mastectomy

Background

The ACOSOG Z0011 study has shown that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is an option to be considered in patients who had 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who proceed with breast-conserving along with postoperative radiotherapy. However, there remains controversy regarding the applicability of this approach in patients who had a mastectomy. The aim of our study is to determine the prognostic differences and risk factors associated with the decision to opt for ALND in breast cancer patients who had 1-2 metastatic SLNs who receive a mastectomy.

Methods

The study conducted a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with cT1-2N0 breast cancer and treated at The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2016 and December 2021, and patients were divided into two cohorts according to whether ALND was performed after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB): SLNB cohort and SLNB + ALND cohort. Outcomes included the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to ensure the balance of variables between the two cohorts. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to ascertain the univariate and multivariate relative risks associated with survival.

Results

There were 812 cases enrolled. After the PSM, 234 receiving ALND and 234 not receiving ALND were matched. A median follow-up period of 56.72 ± 20.29 months was observed. During that time, no significant difference was identified in the DFS and OS in the SLNB + ALND cohort and the SLNB cohort (P = 0.208 and P = 0.102), except for those under 40 years old, SLNB + ALND group showed a reduction in LRR compared to SLNB group (11.1% vs. 2.12%, P = 0.044). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that younger (≤ 40 years), progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and SLNB alone were independent risk factors for LRR; perineural invasion was a risk factor, while endocrinotherapy was a beneficial prognostic indicator for DFS and OS among patients with positive hormone receptor.

Conclusion

ALND does not impact DFS and OS in patients with 1-2 metastatic SLNs who have completed a mastectomy. Being younger (≤ 40 years), having a negative PR, and undergoing SLNB alone were independent risk factors for LRR. Given this finding, we recommend avoiding axillary treatment such as ALND or radiotherapy in patients without risk factors.

Reevaluating Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Total Mastectomy for Low Axillary Burden Breast Cancer: Insights from a Meta-Analysis including the SINODAR-ONE Trial

Complete axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) was previously the standard of care for breast cancer (BC) patients with axillary node disease or macro-metastases found via sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). However, due to significant morbidity, contemporary management now considers a more selective approach, influenced by studies like ACOSOG Z0011. This trial showed that cALND could be omitted without compromising local control or survival in patients with low axillary nodal disease burden undergoing breast-conserving therapy, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. The relevance of this approach for women with low axillary nodal burden undergoing total mastectomy (TM) remained unclear. A PubMed search up to September 2023 identified 147 relevant studies, with 6 meeting the inclusion criteria, involving 4184 patients with BC and low-volume axillary disease (1-3 positive lymph nodes) undergoing TM. Postmastectomy radiotherapy receipt was similar in both groups. After a mean 7.2-year follow-up, both the pooled results and the meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in overall survival. The combined analysis of the published studies, including the subgroup analysis of the SINODAR-One trial, indicates no survival advantage for cALND over SLNB in T1-T2 breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive sentinel lymph nodes (pN1) undergoing mastectomy. This suggests that, following a multidisciplinary evaluation, cALND can be safely omitted. However, the impact of other patient, tumor, and treatment factors on survival requires consideration and therefore further prospective trials are needed for conclusive validation.

Axillary management in patients with clinical node-negative early breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiation (AxRT) remains controversial in patients with clinical node-negative early breast cancer and a positive sentinel lymph node.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive review by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases (up to November 2023). Our primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and axillary recurrence (AR).

Results

We included 26 studies encompassing 145,548 women with clinical node-negative early breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node. Pooled data revealed no significant differences between ALND and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone in terms of OS (hazard ratio [HR]0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.08, p=0.84), DFS (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.19, p=0.61), LRR (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.45-1.20, p=0.31), and AR (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.03, p=0.35). Similarly, no significant differences were observed between AxRT and SLNB alone for OS (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32-1.02, p=0.06) and DFS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26-1.05, p=0.07). When comparing AxRT and ALND, a trend towards higher OS was observed the AxRT group (HR 0.08, 95% CI 0.67-1.15), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.35, I2 = 0%). Additionally, no significant differences significance observed for DFS or AR (p=0.13 and p=0.73, respectively) between the AxRT and ALND groups.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that survival and recurrence rates are not inferior in patients with clinical node-negative early breast cancer and a positive sentinel lymph node who receive SLNB alone compared to those undergoing ALND or AxRT.

Meta-analysis of the application value of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in guiding sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to compare the application value of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICGFI) and its combined tracing method with the blue dye method in guiding sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computerized search of the Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify all relevant literature on ICGFI compared to the sole methylene blue (MB) tracing method in guiding sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer. The search was performed up until May 2023. After assessing the quality of the included studies, a meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 11 relevant studies were included in this research. The analysis results showed that, in terms of the detection rate, the ICGFI group had a higher detection rate to the MB group [odds ratio (OR) = 8.64, 95% CI: 5.46-13.66, P = 0.000], and had a higher quantity compared to the MB group [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.72, 95% CI 0.31-1.13, P = 0.001], and it also had a lower false-negative rate [OR = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.43, P = 0.002]. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the positive detection rate, and sensitivity comparison.

CONCLUSION

The indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and tracing method for sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer are simple and effective, and they are well suited for clinical use. A multicenter randomized controlled trial with a large sample size should be conducted in the future for further validation of the method.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with one to two metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: sub-analysis of the SINODAR-ONE multicentre randomized clinical trial and reopening of enrolment

BACKGROUND

The initial results of the SINODAR-ONE randomized clinical trial reported that patients with T1-2 breast cancer and one to two macrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes treated with breast-conserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy only, and adjuvant therapy did not present worse 3-year survival, regional recurrence, or distant recurrence rates compared with those treated with axillary lymph node dissection. To extend the recommendation of axillary lymph node dissection omission even in patients treated with mastectomy, a sub-analysis of the SINODAR-ONE trial is presented here.

METHODS

Patients with T1-2 breast cancer and no more than two metastatic sentinel lymph nodes undergoing mastectomy were analysed. After sentinel lymph node biopsy, patients were randomly assigned to receive either axillary lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant treatment (standard arm) or adjuvant treatment alone (experimental arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival. The secondary endpoint was recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 218 patients were treated with mastectomy; 111 were randomly assigned to the axillary lymph node dissection group and 107 to the sentinel lymph node biopsy-only group. At a median follow-up of 33.0 months, there were three deaths (two deaths in the axillary lymph node dissection group and one death in the sentinel lymph node biopsy-only group). There were five recurrences in each treatment arm. No axillary lymph node recurrence was observed. The 5-year overall survival rates were 97.8 and 98.7 per cent in the axillary lymph node dissection treatment arm and the sentinel lymph node biopsy-only treatment arm, respectively (P = 0.597). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 95.7 and 94.1 per cent in the axillary lymph node dissection treatment arm and the sentinel lymph node biopsy treatment arm, respectively (P = 0.821).

CONCLUSION

In patients with T1-2 breast cancer and one to two macrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes treated with mastectomy, the overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates of patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy only were not inferior to those treated with axillary lymph node dissection. To strengthen the conclusion of the trial, the enrolment of patients treated with mastectomy was reopened as a single-arm experimental study.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05160324 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Efficacy and safety comparison between axillary lymph node dissection with no axillary surgery in patients with sentinel node-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study the evidence on the efficacy and safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with clinically node-negative but sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive breast cancer using all the available evidence.

METHODS

The Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through February 25, 2023. Original trials that compared only the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with ALND as the control group for patients with clinically node-negative but SLN-positive breast cancer were included. The primary outcomes were axillary recurrence rate, total recurrence rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Meta-analyses were performed to compare the odds ratio (OR) in rates and the hazard ratios (HR) in time-to-event outcomes between both interventions. Based on different study designs, tools in the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool were used for randomized trials and the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions to assess the risk of bias for each included article. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used for the publication's bias assessment.

RESULTS

In total, 30 reports from 26 studies were included in the systematic review (9 reports of RCTs, 21 reports of retrospective cohort studies). According to our analysis, omitting ALND in patients with clinically node-negative but SLN-positive breast cancer had a similar axillary recurrence rate (OR = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-1.20), DFS (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89-1.16), and OS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.03), but caused a significantly lower incidence of adverse events and benefited in locoregional recurrence rate (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97) compared with ALND.

CONCLUSION

For patients with clinically node-negative but SLN-positive breast cancer (no matter the number of the positive SLN), this review showed that SLNB alone had a similar axillary recurrence rate, DFS, and OS, but caused a significantly lower incidence of adverse events and showed a benefit for the locoregional recurrence compared with ALND. An OS benefit was found in the Macro subset that used SLNB alone versus complete ALND. Therefore, omitting ALND is feasible in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD 42023397963.

Deep learning prediction of axillary lymph node status using ultrasound images

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the ability of our convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict axillary lymph node metastasis using primary breast cancer ultrasound (US) images.

METHODS

In this IRB-approved study, 338 US images (two orthogonal images) from 169 patients from 1/2014-12/2016 were used. Suspicious lymph nodes were seen on US and patients subsequently underwent core-biopsy. 64 patients had metastatic lymph nodes. A custom CNN was utilized on 248 US images from 124 patients in the training dataset and tested on 90 US images from 45 patients. The CNN was implemented entirely of 3 × 3 convolutional kernels and linear layers. The 9 convolutional kernels consisted of 6 residual layers, totaling 12 convolutional layers. Feature maps were down-sampled using strided convolutions. Dropout with a 0.5 keep probability and L2 normalization was utilized. Training was implemented by using the Adam optimizer and a final SoftMax score threshold of 0.5 from the average of raw logits from each pixel was used for two class classification (metastasis or not).

RESULTS

Our CNN achieved an AUC of 0.72 (SD ± 0.08) in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis from US images in the testing dataset. The model had an accuracy of 72.6% (SD ± 8.4) with a sensitivity and specificity of 65.5% (SD ± 28.6) and 78.9% (SD ± 15.1) respectively. Our algorithm is available to be shared for research use. (https://github.com/stmutasa/MetUS).

CONCLUSION

It's feasible to predict axillary lymph node metastasis from US images using a deep learning technique. This can potentially aid nodal staging in patients with breast cancer.

Effect of non-sentinel metastasis on adjuvant treatment decisions and survival in Z0011 eligible non-screened detected breast cancer population

BACKGROUND

The Z0011 trial results have shown that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided in cT1-2 patients undergoing breast conservation surgery with 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). We compared the clinicopathological characteristics of the Z0011 eligible non-screen detected breast cancer patients' cohort with the Z0011 trial study population. Additionally, we have explored the effect of non-sentinel metastasis on adjuvant treatment decisions and survival.

METHODS

The details of early breast cancer (EBC) patients fulfilling Z0011 eligibility criteria were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database (2013-2017) and electronic medical records. We used Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 25 and Stata V15 for the data analysis.

RESULTS

128/194 (66%) sentinel lymph node biopsy positive patients had fulfilled the Z0011 inclusion criteria. Compared to the Z0011 study, our cohort patients were younger, with more aggressive disease (higher T2, Grade 3), had a higher rate of macrometastasis (82.8% versus 58.8%) and non-SLN metastasis (48% versus 27%). The information gained by ALND had changed decisions for chemotherapy in 3% and no change of radiotherapy in Z0011 eligible patients. Further nodal positivity in completion ALND was not significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.86) and disease-free survival (p = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Z0011 eligible Indian EBC patients are significantly different from the Z0011 study population, with younger age of presentation, higher grade, a higher rate of both SLN macro metastasis and non-SLN positivity. The impact of non-sentinel metastasis on adjuvant treatment decisions and survival is minimal.

Optimizing Axillary Management in Clinical T1-2N0 Mastectomy Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

BACKGROUND

Following publication of the AMAROS trial, we sought to optimize axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) + axillary radiation (AxRT) utilization in cT1-2N0 patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after mastectomy.

METHODS

In November 2015, our multidisciplinary group implemented a protocol to omit intraoperative SLN evaluation for mastectomy patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer likely to be recommended PMRT if found to have 1-2 positive SLNs (age ≤ 60 years and/or high-risk features defined as estrogen receptor-negative and/or positive for lymphovascular invasion). We prospectively evaluated axillary management, short-term complications, and oncologic outcomes in patients with 1-2 positive SLNs.

RESULTS

From November 2015 to December 2018, 479 of 560 (85%) cT1-2N0 breast cancers treated with mastectomy were potential candidates for PMRT. Intraoperative SLN evaluation was omitted in 344 (72%), thus following the protocol. Overall, 121 cases had 1-2 positive SLNs: 17 (14%) were managed with observation, 5 (4%) PMRT alone, 59 (49%) PMRT + AxRT, 16 (13%) ALND alone, and 24 (20%) ALND + PMRT. Protocol compliance resulted in less ALND (8% vs. 24%) and less ALND + PMRT (9% vs. 41%, p < 0.01). At median follow-up of 24 months, there was one regional and four distant recurrences, with no regional recurrences or differences in disease-free survival in patients treated with ALND versus PMRT + AxRT (100% vs. 98%, p = 0.67). Similarly, there were no differences in complication rates (p = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Omitting intraoperative SLN evaluation in cT1-2N0 mastectomy patients who would be candidates for PMRT if found to have positive nodes decreased rates of ALND and minimized use of ALND + PMRT without compromising outcomes.

Omitting completion axillary lymph node dissection after detection of sentinel node micrometastases in breast cancer: first results from the prospective SENOMIC trial

BACKGROUND

Completion axillary lymph node dissection has been abandoned widely among patients with breast cancer and sentinel lymph node micrometastases, based on evidence from prospective RCTs. Inclusion in these trials has been subject to selection bias, with patients undergoing mastectomy being under-represented. The aim of the SENOMIC (omission of axillary lymph node dissection in SENtinel NOde MICrometases) trial was to confirm the safety of omission of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel lymph node micrometastases, and including patients undergoing mastectomy.

METHODS

The prospective SENOMIC multicentre cohort trial enrolled patients with breast cancer and sentinel lymph node micrometastases who had breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy at one of 23 Swedish hospitals between October 2013 and March 2017. No completion axillary lymph node dissection was performed. The primary endpoint was event-free survival, with a trial accrual target of 452 patients. Survival proportions were based on Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

RESULTS

The trial included 566 patients. Median follow-up was 38 (range 7-67) months. The 3-year event-free survival rate was 96.2 per cent, based on 26 reported breast cancer recurrences, including five isolated axillary recurrences. The unadjusted 3-year event-free survival rate was higher than anticipated, but differed between patients who had mastectomy and those who underwent breast-conserving surgery (93.8 versus 97.8 per cent respectively; P = 0.011). Patients who underwent mastectomy had significantly worse tumour characteristics. On univariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, patients who had mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy had a significantly higher risk of recurrence than those who underwent breast-conserving surgery (hazard ratio 2.91, 95 per cent c.i. 1.25 to 6.75).

CONCLUSION

After 3 years, event-free survival was excellent in patients with breast cancer and sentinel node micrometastases despite omission of axillary lymph node dissection. Long-term follow-up and continued enrolment of patients having mastectomy, especially those not receiving adjuvant radiotherapy, are of utmost importance.