Relationship of health services to medical expenses for the national health insurance and certification rate for long-term care insurance services in municipalities

Study on the Experience of Public Health System Construction in China's COVID-19 Prevention

Background: China's experience in the process of COVID-19 prevention provides a reference for other countries in the world. This article studied the experience of public health system construction in China's COVID-19 prevention. Methods: Based on literature review and theoretical analysis, this paper constructs a theoretical framework of national public health system construction in health crisis. Based on this theoretical framework, combined with the policies and measures formulated by the Chinese government in the process of COVID-19 prevention, this article evaluate the advantages and deficiencies of China's public health system construction in response to COVID-19. Results: The Chinese government ensured the adequate supply of health resources, improved people's ability to pay medical expenses, and adopted advanced public health propaganda methods based on the Internet to help people grasp the basic information and development trend of COVID-19 in the process of COVID-19 prevention. At the same time, the utilization efficiency of health resources was low in China, people's ability to pay for medical expenses was unequal, and the disclosure of virus information in the early stage of the outbreak of COVID-19 is not timely. Conclusions: Other countries can learn from the advantages of China's public health system construction and avoid China's deficiencies in the process of public health system construction, which will help them improve the efficiency of COVID-19 prevention.

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool May Not Indicate Bone Fragility in Women With Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes carries a known risk of bone fracture despite high bone mineral density (BMD). The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) predicts the 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk and hip fracture risk. We investigated the effects of clinical parameters on the FRAX score and evaluated the validity of FRAX for evaluating current bone fragility in diabetes subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-seven thousand, three hundred eighty-nine Japanese women participated in the Chiba bone survey, a population-based, multicenter, cross-sectional study of postmenopausal osteoporosis; we estimated FRAX scores without BMD and compared scores between subjects with and without type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

Mean FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk was significantly higher in the diabetes group. A multiple regression model demonstrated some clinical parameters that affected the FRAX score and, after adjusting for such parameters, the FRAX score was not significantly different between the diabetes and nondiabetes groups, although the type 2 diabetes rate was significantly higher in subjects with a fracture in the past 5 years, which reflected current bone fragility. After adjusting for clinical parameters, the diabetes rate remained significantly higher in subjects with a fracture in the past 5 years, confirming that type 2 diabetes influences current bone fragility. Our study demonstrated that type 2 diabetes truly carries a risk of bone fracture, but adjusted FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk is not significantly different between subjects with and without type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

The FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk without BMD does not correctly indicate current bone fragility in Japanese middle-aged women with type 2 diabetes.

Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey

Osteoporosis not only increases bone fracture risk but also affects survival in postmenopausal women. Although osteoporosis is diagnosed based on low bone mineral density (BMD) determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), BMD measurement is sometimes difficult because DXA is not widely available in the community. The Fracture Risk Assessment tool (FRAX) can predict 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk and hip fracture risk with or without femoral neck BMD. The FRAX has not been investigated adequately in community-dwelling Japanese women. We administered the FRAX tool in 13,421 Japanese women who underwent DXA-based forearm BMD measurement in Chiba Bone Survey, a population-based, multicenter, cross-sectional study of postmenopausal osteoporosis conducted in Chiba, Japan. Mean age was 57.77 ± 9.24 years. Mean forearm BMD was 87.94 ± 17.00% of young adult mean (YAM). Mean FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk without femoral neck BMD was 7.06 ± 5.22%. BMD decreased and percentage of osteoporosis increased from age 55 onward. Age distribution of percentage of subjects with FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk >15% was similar to that of percentage of osteoporosis subjects. We identified the cutoff value of FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk for diagnosis of osteoporosis as 7.2%. With this cutoff, the positive likelihood ratio was over 1.0 at age 55 and above but accuracy was low. In conclusion, FRAX without femoral neck BMD reflects bone status, and may be useful to diagnose osteoporosis in Japanese women aged 55 and above, although the sensitivity was low for osteoporosis screening, especially in middle-aged women.