Outcome of risperidone therapy in elderly patients with chronic psychosis

A pilot study of the safety and efficacy of amisulpride and risperidone in elderly psychotic patients

Objective

The primary objective of this randomised, active–controlled, parallel group, double-blind study was to evaluate the tolerability of treatment with either amisulpride or risperidone in elderly patients with schizophrenia aged over 65 years; evaluation of efficacy was a secondary objective.

Methods

The study included patients of either sex aged 65 years or older fulfilling DSM IV-diagnostic criteria for psychotic disorders and who presented psychotic symptoms severe enough to require antipsychotic medication. Subjects were randomly allocated to a flexible dose of either amisulpride (100–400 mg/day) or risperidone (1–4 mg/day) for six weeks following a three- to six-day placebo wash-out period. Safety assessment involved adverse event reporting, physical examination, blood pressure, heart rate and ECG monitoring, and laboratory tests. Extrapyramidal symptoms were evaluated with the Simpson–Angus Scale, Barnes Akathisia Scale and the AIMS. Efficacy parameters were changes in score on the PANSS, BPRS, CDS and MMSE scores.

Results

Thirty-eight patients were randomised, 25 to amisulpride and 13 to risperidone. A total of 26 adverse events were experienced by 10 patients in the amisulpride group and five patients in the risperidone group. One patient in each group discontinued the study due to the emergence of a movement disorder. Changes in scores on the three measures of extrapyramidal symptoms were similar in the two groups. The PANSS total score decreased by 27.8% in the amisulpride group and by 29% in the risperidone group between inclusion and study end.

Conclusion

Amisulpride and risperidone are generally well tolerated in elderly patients with schizophrenia. Both drugs appeared to be efficacious in this study population, with no differences in efficacy being observed. However, the sample size was too low to reveal potential inter-group differences. Both these atypical antipsychotics thus appear to be suitable for the treatment of schizophrenia in the elderly.

Advancing Health Promotion in Dentistry: Articulating an Integrative Approach to Coaching Oral Health Behavior Change in the Dental Setting

Oral health is managed based on objective measures such as the presence and severity of dental caries and periodontal disease. In recent years, oral health researchers and practitioners have shown increasing interest in a widened array of physical, psychological, and social factors found to influence patients' oral health. In this article, we introduce a behavior change coaching approach that can be used to enhance psychosocial diagnosis and client-centered delivery of health-promoting interventions. Briefly, this health coaching approach is based on an interactive assessment (both physical and psychological), a non-judgmental exploration of patients' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs, a mapping of patient behaviors that may contribute to disease progression, gauging patient motivation, and tailoring health communication to encourage health-promoting behavior change. Developed in a clinical setting, this coaching model is supported by interdisciplinary theory, research, and practice on health behavior change. We suggest that, with supervision, this coaching process may be learned.

Management of schizophrenia in late life with antipsychotic medications: a qualitative review

Although patients with schizophrenia are reported to have excess mortality compared with the general population, many affected patients will nonetheless survive and continue to have the disorder in later life. Consequently, geriatric schizophrenia will be a significant public health concern in the years to come, and evidence-based treatment of schizophrenia in older patients is becoming an urgent issue. However, there has been a paucity of comparative data to guide selection of antipsychotics for schizophrenia in late life. The primary aim of this review was to synthesize the available evidence on management of late-life schizophrenia with antipsychotic medications; a secondary aim was to evaluate treatment resistance in this population. Accordingly, PubMed and EMBASE were searched using the keywords 'antipsychotics', 'age' and 'schizophrenia' to identify psychopharmacological studies of antipsychotics in late-life schizophrenia (last search 30 April 2011). The literature search identified 23 prospective studies of use of antipsychotics for schizophrenia in older patients (generally age ≥65 years), including eight double-blind trials. The sample size was smaller than 40 patients for 52% of the studies. Two of the double-blind studies were post hoc analyses and one was a placebo-controlled trial. In the largest double-blind study, olanzapine (n = 88, median dose 10 mg/day) and risperidone (n = 87, median dose 2 mg/day) were compared in patients not resistant to these therapies, with similar effects. There have also been several open-label trials of these two agents that have shown efficacy and tolerability in non-resistant patients. Evidence on other antipsychotics has been scarce and less robust. The gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia is clozapine. However, almost all of the studies of clozapine to date have effectively excluded older patients with schizophrenia. Only one small study has evaluated clozapine (n = 24, mean dose 300 mg/day) in comparison with chlorpromazine (n = 18, mean dose 600 mg/day) in a difficult-to-treat older population; the investigators reported that both treatments were similarly efficacious. Furthermore, there has been little compelling evidence in favour of or against augmentation of antipsychotics with other psychotropic medications in the older age group. Treatment of non-resistant, late-life schizophrenia with olanzapine and risperidone appears to be supported by the available evidence. However, data on geriatric patients with schizophrenia are generally scarce, particularly for treatment-resistant subpopulations, underscoring the need for more research in this important area.

Risperidone in the treatment of bipolar mania

Atypical antipsychotic medications have assumed growing importance for the treatment of bipolar disorder, an illness that affects approximately 1.2%-3.7% of the general population in a given year. Current practice guidelines for the treatment of bipolar mania support the use of atypical antipsychotic medications as monotherapy or as a component of polytherapy, and in clinical settings the use of atypical antipsychotics to treat bipolar disorder is widespread. Risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic, sometimes referred to as a second-generation antipsychotic. The receptor-binding profile of risperidone, which includes potent antagonism of the serotonin 5-HT2(A), dopamine D(2), and alpha-adrenergic receptors, is believed to be related to positive effects on mood. The FDA-approved bipolar indications for risperidone include: 1) monotherapy for short-term treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder and 2) combination therapy with lithium or valproate for the short-term treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. This review of risperidone for bipolar mania will address the chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and metabolism of risperidone, use with concomitant medications, clinical trials in bipolar mania, as well as safety and tolerability issues. Finally, dosing and administration are addressed as well as use for bipolar mania in geriatric, child, or adolescent patients.

Atypical antipsychotics in Parkinson-sensitive populations

Drug-induced iatrogenic hallucinations and psychosis occur in about 30% of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and are the single most important precipitant for nursing home placement, which carries a grave prognosis. In addition, parkinsonism is a frequent accompaniment to the more common dementing syndromes, Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). The five most recent antipsychotic drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States have been marketed as "atypical" antipsychotics (AA) due to their relative freedom from extrapyramidal symptoms when used in schizophrenia patients. The use of these newer antipsychotic drugs in PD and other parkinson-sensitive populations represents the most stringent test to their freedom from motor side effects. To date, clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine have been studied in parkinson-vulnerable populations. This article reviews the data and highlights the differences that these four drugs have on motor function. It also emphasizes the challenges in evaluating the available data on the motor effects of AA, especially on the non-PD elderly and cognitively impaired population. Suggestions are made for future research to improve the interpretability of these studies.

Would a switch from typical antipsychotics to risperidone be beneficial for elderly schizophrenic patients? A naturalistic, long-term, retrospective, comparative study

Elderly chronic schizophrenia patients are particularly difficult to treat because of aging-related changes, cognitive impairment, and comorbid physical illness. This article describes a naturalistic, retrospective study of typical antipsychotic treatment versus risperidone for elderly psychotic inpatients. Fifty-one patients, mean age 72.7 + 5.9 years, mean disease duration 33.1 + 12.0 years, who met the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were treated by risperidone (n = 26) or typical antipsychotic treatment (n = 25) during acute exacerbation and followed up for 18 months. Patients were rated using the clinical global impression (CGI) scale and positive and negative symptom scale (PANSS), and their body weight was recorded at baseline, 6 months, and 18 months. Both treatment groups improved on all rating scales at 18 months. Levels of decrease in PANSS positive and total scores were more prominent in patients treated with risperidone (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). The change in CGI scores reached significance only after 18 months and was more pronounced in the risperidone group (p < 0.01). Anti-Parkinsonian medications were used more frequently in the typical antipsychotic group, whereas benzodiazepines were used more frequently in the risperidone group. Body mass index increased minimally after 18 months in the risperidone group (+ 0.3 kg/m2), whereas a larger (+ 1.1 kg/m2), albeit not statistically significant, increase was recorded in the typical antipsychotic group. Emergence of side effects was less frequent in patients treated with risperidone (4/26 vs. 16/25 patients, p < 0.01). The results of this study demonstrate that in elderly chronic schizophrenic patients, switching from typical antipsychotics to risperidone is effective and well tolerated.

Risperidone in the treatment of psychoses in the elderly: a case report series

Risperidone is one of the newer atypical antipsychotic agents, which combines potent serotonin and dopamine receptor antagonism. It shows efficacy against the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenic psychoses and other psychotic conditions, and has a low propensity to cause extrapyramidal side effects. The aim of these case reports in elderly patients is to provide the benefit of personal experience with risperidone to the body of published literature and to demonstrate the types of patients that may benefit from treatment. These cases were compiled retrospectively from data collected on referral and during routine hospital appointments. This series covers four main areas of concern when treating the elderly: low-maintenance dosing minimising the likelihood of adverse events; successful treatment of patients previously uncontrolled and experiencing side effects with other antipsychotics; the possibility of intermittent rather than continuous treatment; and the benefits to patients, carers and the health services. At low doses, risperidone is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for psychoses in elderly patients that improves the quality of life for both patients and their caregivers.

The efficacy and safety of risperidone for the treatment of geriatric psychosis

Risperidone is an atypical antipsychotic drug which has been suggested to be beneficial for the treatment of elderly patients with psychotic symptoms. In this study, we assessed the short-term efficacy and the safety of risperidone in geropsychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms. The sample population included 110 elderly inpatients with psychotic disorders. Assessment for drug efficacy using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Sandoz Clinical Assessment-Geriatric scale, and Clinical Global Impression scale was conducted at baseline and also at 4 weeks subsequent to risperidone treatment commencement. Subsequent to commencing risperidone treatment, 80 patients completed a 4-week therapeutic evaluation. Seventy (87.5%) of the 80 patients experienced mild to substantial improvement using the Clinical Global Impression scale. Adverse effects were monitored in all 110 patients. The most commonly detected adverse effects were weakness of legs or walking problems (43/110; 39.1%) and dizziness (32/110; 29.1%). Peripheral edema was noted in 18 (16.4%) patients. Risperidone, in low doses, appeared to have been effective in this sample of patients older than 65 years with psychotic symptoms. The mean dose (2.1 +/- SD 1.4 mg/day) applied was lower then that suggested for young patients and was related to the each specific patient diagnosis. Peripheral edema and walking problems were commonly observed adverse effects for these elderly patients, such problems having not been seen to the same extent in previous studies of young patients.

A long-term, multicenter, open-label study of risperidone in elderly patients with psychosis. On behalf of the Risperidone Working Group

RATIONALE

Studies have shown that risperidone is safe and efficacious in young and middle-aged adults with chronic schizophrenia, but considerably fewer data are available on the treatment of elderly patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders, particularly long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

A 12-month, open-label study was conducted to assess the effects of risperidone in elderly, chronically ill, psychotic patients.

METHODS

This study enrolled 180 elderly, chronically ill, psychotic patients (median age, 72 years [range 54-89]), 97 of whom completed the 12-month study. At endpoint, the mean dose of risperidone was 3.7 mg/day.

RESULTS

Clinical improvement (> or =20% reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Score [PANSS] total score) was achieved by 54% of patients at endpoint. There were significant reductions in PANSS total, subscale (positive, negative, and general psychopathology), and cognition cluster scores at endpoint (p<0.001). Clinical Global Impressions severity of illness scores showed continued improvement through month 12 (p<0.001). In contrast, PANSS data from a historical comparable control group of patients receiving conventional antipsychotic agents showed no symptom improvement over a 12-month treatment period. The severity of preexisting extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) in patients treated with risperidone decreased significantly from baseline to endpoint (p<0.001), and the use of antiparkinsonian medication decreased from 41.1% of patients before the trial to 25.6% during the trial. There were no spontaneous reports of tardive dyskinesia (TD) and the incidence of assessed TD was 4.3% in contrast to the expected 26% reported in middle-aged and elderly patients receiving conventional antipsychotic agents for 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term treatment with risperidone was associated with continued symptom improvement, a decrease in the severity of preexising EPS, and a low incidence of TD in elderly psychotic patients.

Atypical antipsychotics in older adults

Psychotic symptoms are common in older adults and reflect a variety of psychiatric and medical conditions. Antipsychotic drugs form the core of the treatment of these symptoms; however, treatment of the elderly is complicated by a high frequency of comorbid medical illnesses, risk of side effects, and age-related changes in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. The superior safety and efficacy of atypical antipsychotics makes them first-line agents for managing psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Their uses now extend to other conditions such as schizoaffective disorders, delusional disorder, and mood disorders with psychotic features. Although the drugs have been studied extensively in young subjects, well-designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are relatively lacking in the elderly. Our knowledge of their safety, efficacy and dosage in older adults is based on a few studies with small samples or extrapolated from studies of younger patients. Several psychiatric and medical conditions that are associated with psychotic symptoms in older people are reviewed, as well as how these patients may benefit from treatment with these agents.

Health resource utilization and clinical outcomes with risperidone therapy in patients with serious mental illness

This report is an analysis of our experience with risperidone therapy in a veteran population with severe, suboptimally responsive psychosis from a perspective of clinical response and health resource utilization. We conducted a computer search for all patients who received risperidone therapy at our facility from February 1994 until July 1, 1996. Risperidone at our facility is prescribed when psychiatric symptoms appear to be refractory or suboptimally responsive to conventional antipsychotic therapy. A control group of patients on conventional antipsychotic therapy were also selected via the electronic data base. One hundred twenty-nine patients received risperidone therapy at a mean dosage of 5.05+/-2.4 mg/d, for a mean duration of 247.4+/-223.5 days. The largest proportion of patients (48.1%) had marked improvement on risperidone therapy. There were 35 patients who received at least 1 year of risperidone therapy. These patients had a significant decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS) from 80.7 to 28.7 days (P = .003) on risperidone with no compensatory increase in outpatient visits. The group of patients who received conventional antipsychotic therapy during the study time period had a more modest mean reduction in LOS over a 2-year time period from 78.9 days during the initial identified year of conventional antipsychotic therapy to 56.4 days during the second identified year of conventional antipsychotic therapy (P = .2). However, when change in LOS for the entire group was compared, the difference in change in LOS between risperidone and conventional antipsychotic treated patients did not reach statistical significance (P = .2). This preliminary study concurs with other reports that risperidone therapy may be effective in severely mentally ill patients and may be associated with significant reductions in health resource utilization. Comparison of resource utilization between patients receiving risperidone and conventional antipsychotic therapy is still unclear and should be explored in larger and prospective studies.

Risperidone: treatment response in adult and geriatric patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and side effects of risperidone in younger adult and geriatric patients.

METHODS

Open retrospective study of 102 consecutive intakes, prescribed risperidone, by a mental health team. All patients were non-hospitalized community residents. Prior to initiation of risperidone, and at termination of study period, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores were used to track progress. Variables monitored were: concurrent use of other antipsychotics, compliance, side effects, and maintenance dosage.

RESULTS

The most common DSM-IV diagnoses were schizophrenia in the younger adult group and late onset delusional disorders in the geriatric group. Compliance was good for both groups. The geriatric group demonstrated a greater treatment response which was reached at a significantly lower dosage. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of side effects. Examination of response by diagnostic category indicated that geriatric patients with late onset delusional disorder showed the best response while adults with either schizophrenia or affective syndromes also showed positive response.

CONCLUSIONS

Risperidone, at lower than recommended doses, shows promise in the treatment of late onset delusional disorders and behavior syndrome of dementia. The side effect profile was benign, as was suggested by experience in treating schizophrenia. Scientifically more rigorous prospective studies for the indications and efficacy of risperidone in late onset psychotic disorders and psychoses and behavior syndromes associated with dementing illness are overdue.

Treatment of schizophrenia and delusional disorder in the elderly

With increasing longevity, greater numbers of patients with schizophrenia and delusional disorder will be surviving into advanced age. Antipsychotics form the core of the treatment for both of these psychotic disorders. Treatment of elderly patients with antipsychotics is, however, complicated by a much higher risk of adverse effects such as tardive dyskinesia. More is known about treating patients with schizophrenia than those with delusional disorder. The introduction of newer atypical antipsychotics may herald a new era in the pharmacotherapy of elderly psychotic patients. Nonetheless, judicious dosing is essential in the geriatric population. We discuss the benefits and limitations of the main forms of treatment.