A National Assessment of Access to Technology Among Nursing Home Residents: A Secondary Analysis

Revisiting Vaccine Hesitancy in Residential Care Homes for the Elderly for Pandemic Preparedness: A Lesson from COVID-19

Residents in residential care homes for the elderly (RCHEs) are at high risk of severe illnesses and mortality, while staff have high exposure to intimate care activities. Addressing vaccine hesitancy is crucial to safeguard vaccine uptake in this vulnerable setting, especially amid a pandemic. In response to this, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to measure the level of vaccine hesitancy and to examine its associated factors among residents and staff in RCHEs in Hong Kong. We recruited residents and staff from 31 RCHEs in July-November 2022. Of 204 residents, 9.8% had a higher level of vaccine hesitancy (scored ≥ 4 out of 7, mean = 2.44). Around 7% of the staff (n = 168) showed higher vaccine hesitancy (mean = 2.45). From multi-level regression analyses, higher social loneliness, higher anxiety, poorer cognitive ability, being vaccinated with fewer doses, and lower institutional vaccination rates predicted residents' vaccine hesitancy. Similarly, higher emotional loneliness, higher anxiety, being vaccinated with fewer doses, and working in larger RCHEs predicted staff's vaccine hesitancy. Although the reliance on self-report data and convenience sampling may hamper the generalizability of the results, this study highlighted the importance of addressing the loneliness of residents and staff in RCHEs to combat vaccine hesitancy. Innovative and technology-aided interventions are needed to build social support and ensure social interactions among the residents and staff, especially amid outbreaks.

Perspectives of Physicians with Experience in Nursing Home Care on Telehealth Use During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency

BACKGROUND

Despite expanded access to telehealth services for Medicare beneficiaries in nursing homes (NHs) during the COVID-19 public health emergency, information on physicians' perspectives on the feasibility and challenges of telehealth provision for NH residents is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To examine physicians' perspectives on the appropriateness and challenges of providing telehealth in NHs.

PARTICIPANTS

Medical directors or attending physicians in NHs.

APPROACH

We conducted 35 semistructured interviews with members of the American Medical Directors Association from January 18 through January 29, 2021. Outcomes of the thematic analysis reflected perspectives of physicians experienced in NH care on telehealth use.

MAIN MEASURES

The extent to which participants used telehealth in NHs, the perceived value of telehealth for NH residents, and barriers to telehealth provision.

KEY RESULTS

Participants included 7 (20.0%) internists, 8 (22.9%) family physicians, and 18 (51.4%) geriatricians. Five common themes emerged: (1) direct care is needed to adequately care for residents in NHs; (2) telehealth may allow physicians to reach NH residents more flexibly during offsite hours and other scenarios when physicians cannot easily reach patients; (3) NH staff and other organizational resources are critical to the success of telehealth, but staff time is a major barrier to telehealth provision; (4) appropriateness of telehealth in NHs may be limited to certain resident populations and/or services; (5) conflicting views about whether telehealth use will be sustained over time in NHs. Subthemes included the role of resident-physician relationships in facilitating telehealth and the appropriateness of telehealth for residents with cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants had mixed views on the effectiveness of telehealth in NHs. Staff resources to facilitate telehealth and the limitations of telehealth for NH residents were the most raised issues. These findings suggest that physicians in NHs may not view telehealth as a suitable substitute for most in-person services.

The Lived Experience of Physical Separation for Hospice Patients and Families amid COVID-19

CONTEXT

Many hospice patients were physically separated from family members and healthcare professionals during the early COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES

Researchers sought to describe the lived experience of physical separation for hospice patients and family caregivers who adhered to public health guidelines intended to limit the transmission of COVID-19 in the spring of 2020.

METHODS

Researchers performed a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected during a multi-site clinical trial of an intervention that incorporated family caregivers into care plan reviews during biweekly hospice interdisciplinary team meetings. Twenty-eight adult family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer participated in at least one care plan review between March 7, 2020 and June 10, 2020. The final analytic dataset included the transcribed content of 60 care plan reviews, which were analyzed via reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Hospice patients and their family caregivers experienced physical separation as interrupted care that resulted in the potential for unmet informational, functional, and social and emotional needs. Connection strategies employed to adapt to care interruptions and address patient and caregiver needs were not consistently effective.

CONCLUSION

Inclusive, innovative connection strategies are needed to ensure that high-quality end-of-life care is provided to hospice patients and their family caregivers when physical presence must be limited.

Technology Recommendations to Support Person-Centered Care in Long-Term Care Homes during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed persistent inequities in the long-term care sector and brought strict social/physical distancing distancing and public health quarantine guidelines that inadvertently put long-term care residents at risk for social isolation and loneliness. Virtual communication and technologies have come to the forefront as the primary mode for residents to maintain connections with their loved ones and the outside world; yet, many long-term care homes do not have the technological capabilities to support modern day technologies. There is an urgent need to replace antiquated technological infrastructures to enable person-centered care and prevent potentially irreversible cognitive and psychological declines by ensuring residents are able to maintain important relationships with their family and friends. To this end, we provide five technological recommendations to support the ethos of person-centered care in residential long-term care homes during the pandemic and  in a post-COVID-19 pandemic world.

Health Data Sharing in US Nursing Homes: A Mixed Methods Study

OBJECTIVES

(1) To understand the extent to which nursing homes have the capability for data sharing and (2) to explore nursing home leaders' perceptions of data sharing with other health care facilities and with residents and family members.

DESIGN

Exploratory, mixed-methods.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a national survey of nursing home administrative leaders (n = 815) representing every state in the United States. Next, semistructured interviews were used to elicit rich contextual information from (n = 12) administrators from nursing homes with varying data-sharing capabilities.

METHODS

We used descriptive statistics along with Rao-Scott chi-square and logistic regression models to examine the relationship between health data-sharing capabilities and nursing home characteristics such as location, bed size, and type of ownership. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 815 nursing homes completing the survey, 95% had computerized (electronic) medical records, and 46% had some capability for health information exchange. Nursing homes located in metropolitan areas had 2.53 (95% confidence interval = 1.53, 4.18) times greater odds for having health information exchange capability compared with nursing homes in small towns. Perceived challenges to health data sharing with residents and family members and external clinical partners include variance in systems and software, privacy and security concerns, and organizational factors slowing uptake of technology. Perceived benefits of health data sharing included improved communication, improved care planning, and anticipating future demand.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

As health data sharing becomes more ubiquitous in acute care settings, policy makers, nursing home leaders, and other stakeholders should prepare by working to mitigate barriers and capitalize on potential benefits of implementing this technology in nursing homes.