1
|
Sontag AF, Kiselev J, Schaller SJ, Spies C, Rombey T. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients into routine health care: a realist review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:192. [PMID: 38350947 PMCID: PMC10863196 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10665-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of prehabilitation as a new preoperative care pathway to optimise perioperative outcomes, its implementation into routine health care is widely pending. Frail patients might particularly benefit from prehabilitation interventions, but facilitating and hindering factors need to be considered in the implementation process. Thus, our aim was to derive a programme theory on what prehabilitation programmes work for frail patients in what circumstances and why. METHODS Following Pawson's realist review approach, preliminary programme theories on facilitators and barriers were established. General and topic-specific databases were searched systematically for facilitators and barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation for frail patients. Articles were included if they dealt with multimodal prehabilitation programmes prior to surgery in a frail population and if they contained information on facilitators and barriers during the implementation process in the full text. Based on these articles, refined programme theories were generated. RESULTS From 2,609 unique titles, 34 were retained for the realist synthesis. Facilitating factors included the individualisation of prehabilitation programmes to meet the patients' needs and abilities, multimodality, adaption to the local setting and health care system, endorsement by an ambassador and sharing of responsibilities among a multidisciplinary team. Central barriers for frail patients were transportation, lack of social support, and inadequate, overwhelming information provision. CONCLUSIONS Implementing prehabilitation as a new care pathway for frail patients requires organisational readiness and adaptability to the local setting. On an individual level, a clear understanding of responsibilities and of the intervention's goal among patients and providers are necessary. Added attention must be paid to the individualisation to fit the needs and restrictions of frail patients. This makes prehabilitation a resource-intense, but promising intervention for frail surgery patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42022335282).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Frederike Sontag
- Berlin School of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörn Kiselev
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan J Schaller
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Ismaninger Str.22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Claudia Spies
- Department for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Rombey
- Department of Health Care Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steffens D, Denehy L, Solomon M, Koh C, Ansari N, McBride K, Carey S, Bartyn J, Lawrence AS, Sheehan K, Delbaere K. Consumer Perspectives on the Adoption of a Prehabilitation Multimodal Online Program for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5039. [PMID: 37894406 PMCID: PMC10605909 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on the adoption of a prehabilitation multimodal online program. Patients recovering from gastrointestinal cancer surgery at a tertiary hospital between October 2021 and November 2022 were invited to participate. An e-Health program including intensity exercises, nutrition and psychological counselling was used. Patients were instructed to navigate the e-Health program over 24 h using an iPad and then complete the study survey. Patients' characteristics, use of technology, views and minimal expected outcomes from a preoperative online program were collected. Of the 30 patients included, most were female, most reported confidence in the use of technology, most considered the online program safe and most agreed it would be beneficial for their health. "Poor preoperative health" and "lack of motivation and encouragement" were identified as the main barriers to the uptake of a preoperative online program, while program 'simplicity' and perceived 'benefits' were the main facilitators. Significant improvement in postoperative outcomes is perceived to influence patients' willingness to participate in a preoperative multimodal e-Health program. Gastrointestinal cancer patients perceived the adoption of a preoperative multimodal e-Health application as safe to be performed at home and of potential benefit to their health. A range of patient's characteristics, barriers and facilitators to the uptake of an online program were identified. These should be considered in future preoperative multimodal online programs to enhance patient experience, adherence and efficacy. The safety and efficacy of the online prehabilitation program will need to be determined in a larger randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Linda Denehy
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia;
- Department of Health Services Research: Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Michael Solomon
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Colorectal Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Cherry Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Colorectal Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Nabila Ansari
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Colorectal Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Kate McBride
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Sharon Carey
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Nutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Jenna Bartyn
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Aaron Sean Lawrence
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Kym Sheehan
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; (M.S.); (C.K.); (N.A.); (K.M.); (S.C.); (J.B.); (A.S.L.); (K.S.)
| | - Kim Delbaere
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia;
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Banasiewicz T, Kobiela J, Cwaliński J, Spychalski P, Przybylska P, Kornacka K, Bogdanowska-Charkiewicz D, Leyk-Kolańczak M, Borejsza-Wysocki M, Batycka-Stachnik D, Drwiła R. Recommendations on the use of prehabilitation, i.e. comprehensive preparation of the patient for surgery. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2023; 95:62-91. [PMID: 38348849 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.8854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Prehabilitation is a comprehensive preparation of a patient for primarily surgical treatments. Its aim is to improve the patient'sgeneral condition so as to reduce the risk of complications and ensure the fastest possible recovery to full health. Thebasic components of prehabilitation include: improvement of nutritional status, appropriate exercises to improve functioning,psychological support, and help in eliminating addictions. Other important aspects of prehabilitation are: increasinghemoglobin levels in patients with anemia, achieving good glycemic control in patients with diabetes, treatment or stabilizationof any concurrent disorders, or specialist treatment associated with a specific procedure (endoprostheses, ostomyprocedure). This article organizes and outlines the indications for prehabilitation, its scope, duration, and the method to conductit. Experts of various specialties related to prehabilitation agree that it should be an element of surgery preparationwhenever possible, especially in patients with co-existing medical conditions who have been qualified for major procedures.Prehabilitation should be carried out by interdisciplinary teams, including family physicians and various specialists in thetreatment of comorbidities. Prehabilitation requires urgent systemic and reimbursement solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Banasiewicz
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Instytut Chirurgii, Uniwersytet Medyczny im K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Jarosław Kobiela
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Transplantacyjnej, Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
| | - Jarosław Cwaliński
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Instytut Chirurgii, Uniwersytet Medyczny im K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Piotr Spychalski
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Transplantacyjnej, Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
| | - Patrycja Przybylska
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Instytut Chirurgii, Uniwersytet Medyczny im K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Karolina Kornacka
- Oddział Chirurgii Ogólnej, Onkologicznej i Kolorektalnej, Wielospecjalistyczny Szpital Miejski im. J. Strusia, Poznań
| | | | - Magdalena Leyk-Kolańczak
- Zakład Pielęgniarstwa Chirurgicznego, Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Transplantacyjnej, Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny
| | - Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki
- Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej, Endokrynologicznej i Onkologii Gastroenterologicznej, Instytut Chirurgii, Uniwersytet Medyczny im K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
| | - Dominika Batycka-Stachnik
- Oddział Kliniczny Chirurgii Serca, Naczyń i Transplantologii, Krakowski Szpital Specjalistyczny im. Św. Jana Pawła II, Kraków
| | - Rafał Drwiła
- Katedra i Zakład Anestezjologii i Intensywnej Terapii, Collegium Medicum Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vinolo-Gil MJ, García-Campanario I, Estebanez-Pérez MJ, Pastora-Bernal JM, Rodríguez-Huguet M, Martín-Vega FJ. Blood Flow Restriction in Oncological Patients: Advantages and Safety Considerations. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2062. [PMID: 37510502 PMCID: PMC10379018 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11142062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer, being a highly widespread disease on a global scale, has prompted researchers to explore innovative treatment approaches. In this regard, blood flow restriction has emerged as a promising procedure utilized in diverse clinical populations with favorable results including improvements in muscle strength, cardiovascular function, and postoperative recovery. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of blood flow restriction in cancer survivors. METHODS An investigation was carried out using various databases until February 2023: PubMed, Scientific Electronic Library Online, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Plus, SPORTDiscus, Physiotherapy and Podiatry of the Complutense University of Madrid, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, Research Library, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Literature Complete Journal Storage, and the gray literature. To assess the methodological quality of the studies, the PEDro scale was utilized, and the Cochrane Collaboration tool was employed to evaluate the risk of bias. RESULTS Five articles found that blood flow restriction was beneficial in improving several factors, including quality of life, physical function, strength, and lean mass, and in reducing postoperative complications and the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION Blood flow restriction can be a viable and effective treatment option. It is important to note that the caution with which one should interpret these results is due to the restricted quantity of articles and significant variation, and future research should concentrate on tailoring the application to individual patients, optimizing load progression, ensuring long-term follow-up, and enhancing the methodological rigor of studies, such as implementing sample blinding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Jesus Vinolo-Gil
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11003 Cadiz, Spain; (M.R.-H.); (F.J.M.-V.)
- Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation of Cádiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain
- Rehabilitation Clinical Management Unit, Interlevels-Intercenters Hospital Puerta del Mar, Hospital Puerto Real, Cadiz Bay-La Janda Health District, 11006 Cadiz, Spain
| | - Ismael García-Campanario
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cadiz, Grupo PAIDI UCA CTS391, 11003 Cadiz, Spain;
| | - María-José Estebanez-Pérez
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain; (M.-J.E.-P.); (J.-M.P.-B.)
| | - José-Manuel Pastora-Bernal
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain; (M.-J.E.-P.); (J.-M.P.-B.)
| | - Manuel Rodríguez-Huguet
- Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cadiz, 11003 Cadiz, Spain; (M.R.-H.); (F.J.M.-V.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Evans HL, Scalea J. Impact of Digital Health upon the Surgical Patient Experience: The Patient as Consumer. Surg Clin North Am 2023; 103:357-368. [PMID: 36948724 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2023]
Abstract
The adoption of digital health services in surgical care delivery is changing the patient experience. The goal of patient-generated health data monitoring incorporated with patient-centered education and feedback is to optimally prepare patients for surgery and personalize postoperative care to improve outcomes that matter to both patients and surgeons. Challenges include the need for the adoption of new methods for implementation and evaluation and equitable application of surgical digital health interventions, with considerations for accessibility as well as the development of new diagnostics and decision support that include the needs and characteristics of all populations served.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather L Evans
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB 417, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | - Joseph Scalea
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB 417, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kerstiens S, Bender EM, Rizzo MG, Landi A, Gleason LJ, Huisingh-Scheetz M, Rubin D, Ferguson M, Madariaga MLL. Technology-assisted behavioral intervention to encourage prehabilitation in frail older adults undergoing surgery: Development and design of the BeFitMe™ Apple Watch app. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231203957. [PMID: 37766907 PMCID: PMC10521300 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231203957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Increasing the physical activity of frail, older patients before surgery through prehabilitation (prehab) can hasten return to autonomy and reduce complications postoperatively. However, prehab participation is low in the clinical setting. In this study, we re-design an existing prehab smartphone application (BeFitMe™) using a novel standalone Apple Watch platform to increase accessibility and usability for vulnerable patients. Methods Design Science Research Methodology was used to (1) develop an approach to clinical research using standalone Apple Watches, (2) re-design BeFitMe™ for the Apple Watch platform, and (3) incorporate user feedback into app design. In phase 3, beta and user testers gave feedback via a follow-up phone call. Exercise data was extracted from the watch after testing. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize accessibility and usability. Results BeFitMe™ was redesigned for the Apple Watch with full functionality without requiring patients to have an iPhone or internet connectivity and the ability to passively collect exercise data without patient interaction. Three study staff participated in beta testing over 3 weeks. Six randomly chosen thoracic surgery patients participated in user testing over 12 weeks. Feedback from beta and user testers was addressed with updated software (versions 1.0-1.10), improved interface and notification schemes, and the development of educational materials used during enrollment. The majority of users (5/6, 83%) participated by responding to at least one notification and data was able to be collected for 54/82 (68%) of the days users had the watches. The amount of data collected in BeFitMe™ Watch app increased from 2/11 (16%) days with the first patient tester to 13/13 (100%) days with the final patient tester. Conclusions The BeFitMe™ Watch app is accessible and usable. The BeFitMe™ Watch app may help older patients, particularly those from vulnerable backgrounds with fewer resources, participate in prehab prior to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savanna Kerstiens
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edward M. Bender
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael G. Rizzo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Andrea Landi
- Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Lauren J. Gleason
- Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Megan Huisingh-Scheetz
- Department of Medicine, Section of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Daniel Rubin
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mark Ferguson
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|