1
|
Bhardwaj A, Barry Walsh C, Ezzat A, O'Riordan C, Kennedy N, Toomey CM. Patient and clinician perspectives of online-delivered exercise programmes for chronic musculoskeletal conditions: a mixed-methods systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:2196-2212. [PMID: 37341382 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2224085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To synthesize common or differing perceptions of patients' and clinicians' that influence uptake of online-delivered exercise programmes (ODEPs) for chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. METHODS Eight databases were searched from inception to April 2023 for studies including (1) patients with and/or clinicians delivering ODEPs for chronic MSK conditions, and (2) synchronous ODEPs, where information is exchanged simultaneously (mode A); asynchronous ODEPs, with at least one synchronous feature (mode B); or no ODEPs, documenting past experiences and/or likelihood of participating in an ODEP (mode C). Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists were used to assess study quality. Perceptions of patients' and clinicians' influencing uptake of ODEPs were extracted. Quantitative and qualitative data were synthesised and integrated. RESULTS Twenty-one studies were included (twelve quantitative, seven qualitative, and two mixed-methods) investigating the perceptions of 1275 patients and 534 clinicians on ODEP mode A (n = 7), mode B (n = 8), and mode C (n = 6). Sixteen of the 23 identified perceptions related to satisfaction, acceptability, usability, and effectiveness were common, with 70% of perceptions facilitating uptake and 30% hindering uptake. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight the need to promote targeted education for patients and clinicians addressing interconnected perceptions, and to develop evidence-based perception-centred strategies encouraging integrated care and guideline-based management of chronic MSK conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avantika Bhardwaj
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Caoimhe Barry Walsh
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Allison Ezzat
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Canada
| | - Cliona O'Riordan
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Norelee Kennedy
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Clodagh M Toomey
- School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education & Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harnik MA, Scheidegger A, Blättler L, Nemecek Z, Sauter TC, Limacher A, Reisig F, Grosse Holtforth M, Streitberger K. Acceptance, Satisfaction, and Preference With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2021-2022: Survey Among Patients With Chronic Pain. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e53154. [PMID: 38684086 PMCID: PMC11060324 DOI: 10.2196/53154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has forced many health care providers to make changes in their treatment, with telemedicine being expanded on a large scale. An earlier study investigated the acceptance of telephone calls but did not record satisfaction with treatment or patients' preferences. This warranted a follow-up study to investigate acceptance, satisfaction, and preferences regarding telemedicine, comprising of phone consultations, among health care recipients. OBJECTIVE The primary aim was to assess the acceptance and satisfaction of telemedicine during the subsequent months of 2021-2022, after the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Furthermore, we aimed to assess patients' preferences and whether these differed in patients who had already experienced telemedicine in the past, as well as correlations between acceptance and satisfaction, pain intensity, general condition, perception of telemedicine, and catastrophizing. Finally, we aimed to investigate whether more governmental restrictions were correlated with higher acceptance. METHODS An anonymous cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted between January 27, 2021, and February 4, 2022, enrolling patients undergoing outpatient pain therapy in a tertiary university clinic. We conducted a descriptive analysis of acceptance and satisfaction with telemedicine and investigated patients' preferences. Further, we conducted a descriptive and correlational analysis of the COVID-19 stringency index. Spearman correlation analysis and a chi-square test for categorical data were used with Cramer V statistic to assess effect sizes. RESULTS Our survey was completed by 60 patients. Telemedicine acceptance and satisfaction were high, with an average score of 7.6 (SD 3.3; on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale from 0=not at all to 10=completely), and 8.8 (SD 1.8), respectively. Respondents generally preferred on-site consultations to telemedicine (n=35, 58% vs n=24, 40%). A subgroup analysis revealed that respondents who already had received phone consultation, showed a higher preference for telemedicine (n/N=21/42, 50% vs n/N=3/18, 17%; χ22 [N=60]=7.5, P=.02, Cramer V=0.354), as well as those who had been treated for more than 3 months (n/N=17/31, 55% vs n/N=7/29, 24%; χ22 [N=60]=6.5, P=.04, Cramer V=0.329). Acceptance of telemedicine showed a moderate positive correlation with satisfaction (rs{58}=0.41, P<.05), but there were no correlations between the COVID-19 stringency index and the other variables. CONCLUSIONS Despite high acceptance of and satisfaction with telemedicine, patients preferred on-site consultations. Preference for telemedicine was markedly higher in patients who had already received phone consultations or had been treated for longer than 3 months. This highlights the need to convey knowledge of eHealth services to patients and the value of building meaningful relationships with patients at the beginning of treatment. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the modality of patient care should be discussed individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Alexander Harnik
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Centre for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Alina Scheidegger
- Psychosomatic Medicine, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Larissa Blättler
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Zdenek Nemecek
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas C Sauter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Emergency Telemedicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Limacher
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Florian Reisig
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin Grosse Holtforth
- Psychosomatic Medicine, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Konrad Streitberger
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barry Walsh C, Cahalan R, Hinman RS, O’Sullivan K. Exploring attitudes of people with chronic health conditions towards the use of group-based telerehabilitation: A qualitative study. Clin Rehabil 2024; 38:130-142. [PMID: 37632125 PMCID: PMC10845824 DOI: 10.1177/02692155231197385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study explores the attitudes of people with chronic health conditions towards the use of group-based telerehabilitation. DESIGN A qualitative research study. SETTING The setting involved semi-structured focus groups via videoconferencing software. PARTICIPANTS A purposive sample of 18 people with chronic health conditions including cardiorespiratory, neurological and musculoskeletal conditions was recruited via national patient advocacy and support groups in Ireland and clinical contacts. The sample included both those who had, and had not, previously engaged in telerehabilitation programmes. PROCEDURES An online questionnaire collected demographic information and data regarding previous telerehabilitation participation and telerehabilitation preferences. Focus groups were conducted using videoconferencing software, in accordance with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) Checklist, and analysed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's methodology. Findings were triangulated with quantitative questionnaire data. RESULTS Four focus groups were conducted including participants with chronic cardiorespiratory (n = 8), neurological (n = 6) and musculoskeletal (n = 4) conditions. Three themes were identified regarding telerehabilitation: (a) benefits and facilitators (including convenience, increased service accessibility, social connection and technological support), (b) challenges and barriers (including technological access and literacy, limited 'hands-on' therapy, safety concerns and social limitations), and (c) preferences (regarding mode of delivery, content, duration and generic programmes for mixed-condition groups). CONCLUSIONS Telerehabilitation is convenient for people with chronic conditions; however, concerns exist regarding the use of technology and the limitations of this healthcare delivery method. The role of telerehabilitation is valued, and future programmes should acknowledge patient preferences including a hybrid model of care, exercise and educational content, social interaction and synchronous components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roisin Cahalan
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Physical Activity for Health Research Cluster, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Rana S Hinman
- Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kieran O’Sullivan
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Sports and Human Performance Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Ageing Research Centre, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vo LK, Allen MJ, Cunich M, Thillainadesan J, McPhail SM, Sharma P, Wallis S, McGowan K, Carter HE. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments. Soc Sci Med 2024; 340:116459. [PMID: 38048738 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence from discrete choice experiments (DCEs) eliciting preferences for virtual models of care, as well as to assess the quality of those DCEs and compare the relative preferences for different stakeholder groups. Articles were included if published between January 2010 and December 2022. Data were synthesised narratively, and attributes were assessed for frequency, significance, and relative importance using a semi-quantitative approach. Overall, 21 studies were included encompassing a wide range of virtual care modalities, with the most common setting being virtual consultations for outpatient management of chronic conditions. A total of 135 attributes were identified and thematically classified into six categories: service delivery, service quality, technical aspects, monetary aspects, health provider characteristics and health consumer characteristics. Attributes related to service delivery were most frequently reported but less highly ranked. Service costs were consistently significant across all studies where they appeared, indicating their importance to the respondents. All studies examining health providers' preferences reported either system performance or professional endorsement attributes to be the most important. Substantial heterogeneity in attribute selection and preference outcomes were observed across studies reporting on health consumers' preferences, suggesting that the consideration of local context is important in the design and delivery of person-centred virtual care services. In general, the experimental design and analysis methods of included studies were clearly reported and justified. An improvement was observed in the quality of DCE design and analysis in recent years, particularly in the attribute development process. Given the continued growth in the use of DCEs within healthcare settings, further research is needed to develop a standardised approach for quantitatively synthesising DCE findings. There is also a need for further research on preferences for virtual care in post-pandemic contexts, where emerging evidence suggests that preferences may differ to those observed in pre-pandemic times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linh K Vo
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Social Work and Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
| | - Michelle J Allen
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Social Work and Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
| | - Michelle Cunich
- Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, Central Clinical School Central Sydney (Patyegarang) Precinct, The University of Sydney, John Hopkins Dr, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Economics Collaborative, Sydney Local Health District, King George V Building, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia; Implementation and Policy, Cardiovascular Initiative, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia; Sydney Institute for Women, Children and Their Families, 18 Marsden Street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Janani Thillainadesan
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Hospital, Hospital Rd, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Science Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Steven M McPhail
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Social Work and Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia; Digital Health and Informatics Directorate, Metro South Health, Ipswich Road, QLD, 4102, Australia.
| | - Pakhi Sharma
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Social Work and Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
| | - Shannon Wallis
- Preventative and Prison Health Services, West Moreton Health, 2 Bell Street, Ipswich, QLD, 4305, Australia.
| | - Kelly McGowan
- Preventative and Prison Health Services, West Moreton Health, 2 Bell Street, Ipswich, QLD, 4305, Australia.
| | - Hannah E Carter
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Social Work and Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Madanian S, Nakarada-Kordic I, Reay S, Chetty T. Patients' perspectives on digital health tools. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100171. [PMID: 37384154 PMCID: PMC10294099 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Objective Digital technology has changed the way healthcare is delivered and accessed. However, the focus is mostly on technology and clinical aspects. This review aimed to integrate and critically analyse the available knowledge regarding patients' perspectives on digital health tools and identify facilitators and barriers to their uptake. Methods A narrative review was conducted using the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. Information related to facilitators and barriers to uptake was synthesised and interpreted using thematic and content analyses, respectively. Results Seventy-one out of 1722 articles identified were eligible for inclusion. Patient empowerment, self-management, and personalisation were identified as the main factors that contributed to patient uptake in using digital health tools. Digital literacy, health literacy, and privacy concerns were identified as barriers to the uptake of digital health technology. Conclusion Digital health technologies have changed the way healthcare is experienced by patients. Research highlights the disconnect between the development and implementation of digital health tools and the patients they are created for. This review may serve as the foundation for future research incorporating patients' perspectives to help increase patients' engagement with emerging technologies. Innovation Participatory design approaches have the potential to support the creation of patient-centred digital health tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samaneh Madanian
- Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, School of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Science, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), 6 St. Paul Street, AUT WZ Building, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
| | - Ivana Nakarada-Kordic
- Good Health Design, School of Art and Design, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), 27 St. Paul Street, AUT WE Building, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
| | - Stephen Reay
- Good Health Design, School of Art and Design, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), 27 St. Paul Street, AUT WE Building, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
| | - T'heniel Chetty
- Good Health Design, School of Art and Design, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), 27 St. Paul Street, AUT WE Building, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Puri SN, Lalwani L. A Comparison Between Cardiac Telerehabilitation Program and Outpatient Hospital-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery: A Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e48488. [PMID: 38073989 PMCID: PMC10704402 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a prevalent and possibly fatal cardiovascular ailment, and it is treated surgically by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The coronary arteries, which supply the heart with oxygen and nutrients, are the most commonly affected. Even though CABG is a frequently employed procedure to restore cardiac blood flow, prolonged rehabilitation is necessary for long-term success. For patients with heart disease, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) involves a comprehensive therapeutic approach. It consists of risk mitigation, regular exercise, health education, and efficient stress management. Information and communication technology is used in telerehabilitation (TR), a rehabilitation service that offers a flexible choice that improves self-management. This study examined novel approaches and effective intervention elements while comparing cardiac TR with center-based programs in terms of risk factor management, patient commitment, and satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh N Puri
- Department of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education And Research (DU), Wardha, IND
| | - Lajwanti Lalwani
- Department of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education And Research (DU), Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Han HW, Park SW, Kim DY, Lee BS, Kim D, Jeon N, Yang YJ. E-Health Interventions for Older Adults With Frailty: A Systematic Review. Ann Rehabil Med 2023; 47:348-357. [PMID: 37907226 PMCID: PMC10620492 DOI: 10.5535/arm.23090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE : To systematically review the efficacy of e-Health interventions on physical performance, activity and quality of life in older adults with sarcopenia or frailty. METHODS : A systematic review was conducted by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINHAL, Web of Science, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database for experimental studies published in English from 1990 to 2021. E-Health studies investigating physical activity, physical performance, quality of life, and activity of daily living assessment in adults aged ≥65 years with sarcopenia or frailty were selected. RESULTS : Among the 3,164 identified articles screened, a total of 4 studies complied with the inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogeneous by participant characteristics, type of e-Health intervention, and outcome measurement. Age criteria for participant selection and sex distribution were different between studies. Each study used different criteria for frailty, and no study used sarcopenia as a selection criteria. E-Health interventions were various across studies. Two studies used frailty status as an outcome measure and showed conflicting results. Muscle strength was assessed in 2 studies, and meta-analysis showed statistically significant improvement after intervention (standardized mean difference, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.94; p=0.80, I2=0%). CONCLUSION : This systematic review found insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of e-Health interventions. Nevertheless, the studies included in this review showed positive effects of e-Health interventions on improving muscle strength, physical activity, and quality of life in older adults with frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeong-Wook Han
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, International St Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Si-Woon Park
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, International St Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Doo Young Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, International St Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Bum-Suk Lee
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, International St Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Daham Kim
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, International St Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Namo Jeon
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, International St Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Yun-Jung Yang
- Department of Convergence Science, International St Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Snoswell CL, Smith AC, Page M, Caffery LJ. Patient preferences for specialist outpatient video consultations: A discrete choice experiment. J Telemed Telecare 2023; 29:707-715. [PMID: 34142895 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x211022898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Telehealth has been shown to improve access to care, reduce personal expenses and reduce the need for travel. Despite these benefits, patients may be less inclined to seek a telehealth service, if they consider it inferior to an in-person encounter. The aims of this study were to identify patient preferences for attributes of a healthcare service and to quantify the value of these attributes. METHODS We surveyed patients who had taken an outpatient telehealth consult in the previous year using a survey that included a discrete choice experiment. We investigated patient preferences for attributes of healthcare delivery and their willingness to pay for out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS Patients (n = 62) preferred to have a consultation, regardless of type, than no consultation at all. Patients preferred healthcare services with lower out-of-pocket costs, higher levels of perceived benefit and less time away from usual activities (p < 0.008). Most patients preferred specialist care over in-person general practitioner care. Their order of preference to obtain specialist care was a videoconsultation into the patient's local general practitioner practice or hospital (p < 0.003), a videoconsultation into the home, and finally travelling for in-person appointment. Patients were willing to pay out-of-pocket costs for attributes they valued: to be seen by a specialist over videoconference ($129) and to reduce time away from usual activities ($160). CONCLUSION Patients value specialist care, lower out-of-pocket costs and less time away from usual activities. Telehealth is more likely than in-person care to cater to these preferences in many instances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Centaine L Snoswell
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Australia
- Pharmacy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Australia
| | - Anthony C Smith
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Matthew Page
- Clinical Excellence Queensland, Queensland Health, Australia
| | - Liam J Caffery
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ader L, Schick A, Löffler M, Löffler A, Beiner E, Eich W, Vock S, Sirazitdinov A, Malone C, Hesser J, Hopp M, Ruckes C, Flor H, Tesarz J, Reininghaus U. Refocusing of Attention on Positive Events Using Monitoring-Based Feedback and Microinterventions for Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in the PerPAIN Randomized Controlled Trial: Protocol for a Microrandomized Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e43376. [PMID: 37728983 PMCID: PMC10551789 DOI: 10.2196/43376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMSP) affects between 13% and 47% of the population, with a global growth rate of 20.3% within the last 15 years, suggesting that there is a high need for effective treatments. Pain diaries have long been a common tool in nonpharmacological pain treatment for monitoring and providing feedback on patients' symptoms in daily life. More recently, positive refocusing techniques have come to be used, promoting pain-free episodes and positive outcomes rather than focusing on managing the pain. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the feasibility (ie, acceptability, intervention adherence, and fidelity) and initial signals of efficacy of the PerPAIN app, an ecological momentary intervention for patients with CMSP. The app comprises digitalized monitoring using the experience sampling method (ESM) and feedback. In addition, the patients receive 3 microinterventions targeted at refocusing of attention on positive events. METHODS In a microrandomized trial, we will recruit 35 patients with CMSP who will be offered the app for 12 weeks. Participants will be prompted to fill out 4 ESM monitoring questionnaires a day assessing information on their current context and the proximal outcome variables: absence of pain, positive mood, and subjective activity. Participants will be randomized daily and weekly to receive no feedback, verbal feedback, or visual feedback on proximal outcomes assessed by the ESM. In addition, the app will encourage participants to complete 3 microinterventions based on positive psychology and cognitive behavioral therapy techniques. These microinterventions are prompts to report joyful moments and everyday successes or to plan pleasant activities. After familiarizing themselves with each microintervention individually, participants will be randomized daily to receive 1 of the 3 exercises or none. We will assess whether the 2 feedback types and the 3 microinterventions increase proximal outcomes at the following time point. The microrandomized trial is part of the PerPAIN randomized controlled trial (German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00022792) investigating a personalized treatment approach to enhance treatment outcomes in CMSP. RESULTS Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee II of the University of Heidelberg on August 4, 2020. Recruitment for the microrandomized trial began in May 2021 and is ongoing at the time of submission. By October 10, 2022, a total of 24 participants had been enrolled in the microrandomized trial. CONCLUSIONS This trial will provide evidence on the feasibility of the PerPAIN app and the initial signals of efficacy of the different intervention components. In the next step, the intervention would need to be further refined and investigated in a definitive trial. This ecological momentary intervention presents a potential method for offering low-level accessible treatment to a wide range of people, which could have substantial implications for public health by reducing disease burden of chronic pain in the population. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/43376.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Ader
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anita Schick
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Martin Löffler
- Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Annette Löffler
- Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Eva Beiner
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Eich
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Vock
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrei Sirazitdinov
- Data Analysis and Modeling, Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical School Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christopher Malone
- Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jürgen Hesser
- Data Analysis and Modeling, Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical School Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Central Institute for Scientific Computing, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Central Institute for Computer Engineering, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- CZS Heidelberg Center for Model-Based AI, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hopp
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christian Ruckes
- Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Herta Flor
- Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jonas Tesarz
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Reininghaus
- Department of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Centre for Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King´s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaloty K, Rudecki J, Craine V, Moyes A, Armstrong R, Baxter M, Hunter J, Mustafa N, Grant G, Vader K, Bosma R. Virtual care exercise interventions in multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics: a qualitative study of perspectives of adults living with chronic pain. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:2976-2983. [PMID: 36073755 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2117864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chronic pain affects 1 in 4 Canadians and is a leading contributor of disability. Although virtual care has become more prevalent, it is unclear how adults living with chronic pain perceive virtual delivery of exercise interventions within multidisciplinary chronic pain clinics (MCPC). This study explores the perspectives of adults living with chronic pain regarding their perceived barriers and facilitators and recommendations when implementing virtual care exercise interventions within MCPCs. METHODS We conducted an interpretive description qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with adults (age ≥18 years) living with chronic pain from a MCPC in Toronto, Canada, between March 1 and April 30, 2021. RESULTS We completed fifteen (N = 15) interviews of adults living with chronic pain. We identified eight themes that addressed the study objectives: 1) virtual care supplements in-person care, 2) virtual care improves accessibility, 3) impact of technology on participation, 4) navigating the home environment, 5) impact of pain on participation, 6) impact of supervision and feedback, 7) the need for tailored care, and 8) the need for preparation and additional support. CONCLUSION Our results reveal that adults living with chronic pain view virtual care exercise interventions positively however, the implementation of these interventions must be carefully considered within MCPCs. Specifically, virtual care was considered an excellent adjunct to in-person care but should not replace it completely.Implications for RehabilitationChronic pain is a leading contributor of disability.Exercise interventions are recommended component of comprehensive pain management.Virtual delivery of exercise interventions are becoming more prevalent.Adults living with chronic pain view virtual care exercise interventions positively as they can supplement in-person care and improve access to this type of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiren Kaloty
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Julia Rudecki
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vanessa Craine
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexander Moyes
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert Armstrong
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Megan Baxter
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Judith Hunter
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nida Mustafa
- Toronto Academic Pain Medicine Institute (TAPMI), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gillian Grant
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Toronto Academic Pain Medicine Institute (TAPMI), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kyle Vader
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Rachael Bosma
- Toronto Academic Pain Medicine Institute (TAPMI), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pak SS, Janela D, Freitas N, Costa F, Moulder R, Molinos M, Areias AC, Bento V, Cohen SP, Yanamadala V, Souza RB, Correia FD. Comparing Digital to Conventional Physical Therapy for Chronic Shoulder Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e49236. [PMID: 37490337 PMCID: PMC10474513 DOI: 10.2196/49236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic shoulder pain (CSP) is a common condition with various etiologies, including rotator cuff disorders, adhesive capsulitis, shoulder instability, and shoulder arthritis. It is associated with substantial disability and psychological distress, resulting in poor productivity and quality of life. Physical therapy constitutes the mainstay treatment for CSP, but several barriers exist in accessing care. In recent years, telerehabilitation has gained momentum as a potential solution to overcome such barriers. It has shown numerous benefits, including improving access and convenience, promoting patient adherence, and reducing costs. However, to date, no previous randomized controlled trial has compared fully remote digital physical therapy to in-person rehabilitation for nonoperative CSP. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between digital physical therapy and conventional in-person physical therapy in patients with CSP. METHODS We conducted a single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial involving 82 patients with CSP referred for outpatient physical therapy. Participants were randomized into digital or conventional physical therapy (8-week interventions). The digital intervention consisted of home exercise, education, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), using a device with movement digitalization for biofeedback and asynchronous physical therapist monitoring through a cloud-based portal. The conventional group received in-person physical therapy, including exercises, manual therapy, education, and CBT. The primary outcome was the change (baseline to 8 weeks) in function and symptoms using the short-form of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures included self-reported pain, surgery intent, analgesic intake, mental health, engagement, and satisfaction. All questionnaires were delivered electronically. RESULTS A total of 90 participants were randomized into digital or conventional physical therapy, with 82 receiving the allocated intervention. Both groups experienced significant improvements in function measured by the short-form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, with no differences between groups (-1.8, 95% CI -13.5 to 9.8; P=.75). For secondary outcomes, no differences were observed in surgery intent, analgesic intake, and mental health or worst pain. Higher reductions were observed in average and least pain in the conventional group, which, given the small effect sizes (least pain 0.15 and average pain 0.16), are unlikely to be clinically meaningful. High adherence and satisfaction were observed in both groups, with no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that fully remote digital programs can be viable care delivery models for CSP given their scalability and effectiveness, assessed through comparison with high-dosage in-person rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04636528); https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04636528.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang S Pak
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Nina Freitas
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Robert Moulder
- Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
| | | | | | | | - Steven P Cohen
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | | | - Richard B Souza
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Fernando Dias Correia
- Sword Health Inc, Draper, UT, United States
- Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Areias AC, Janela D, Molinos M, Moulder RG, Bento V, Yanamadala V, Cohen SP, Correia FD, Costa F. Managing Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults Through a Digital Care Solution: Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Clinical Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2023; 10:e49673. [PMID: 37465960 PMCID: PMC10466151 DOI: 10.2196/49673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aging is closely associated with an increased prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions. Digital musculoskeletal care interventions emerged to deliver timely and proper rehabilitation; however, older adults frequently face specific barriers and concerns with digital care programs (DCPs). OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate whether known barriers and concerns of older adults impacted their participation in or engagement with a DCP or the observed clinical outcomes in comparison with younger individuals. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a single-arm investigation assessing the recovery of patients with musculoskeletal conditions following a DCP for up to 12 weeks. Patients were categorized according to age: ≤44 years old (young adults), 45-64 years old (middle-aged adults), and ≥65 years old (older adults). DCP access and engagement were evaluated by assessing starting proportions, completion rates, ability to perform exercises autonomously, assistance requests, communication with their physical therapist, and program satisfaction. Clinical outcomes included change between baseline and program end for pain (including response rate to a minimal clinically important difference of 30%), analgesic usage, mental health, work productivity, and non-work-related activity impairment. RESULTS Of 16,229 patients, 12,082 started the program: 38.3% (n=4629) were young adults, 55.7% (n=6726) were middle-aged adults, and 6% (n=727) were older adults. Older patients were more likely to start the intervention and to complete the program compared to young adults (odds ratio [OR] 1.72, 95% CI 1.45-2.06; P<.001 and OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.97-2.92; P<.001, respectively) and middle-aged adults (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.45; P=.03 and OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.68; P=.001, respectively). Whereas older patients requested more technical assistance and exhibited a slower learning curve in exercise performance, their engagement was higher, as reflected by higher adherence to both exercise and education pieces. Older patients interacted more with the physical therapist (mean 12.6, SD 18.4 vs mean 10.7, SD 14.7 of young adults) and showed higher satisfaction scores (mean 8.7, SD 1.9). Significant improvements were observed in all clinical outcomes and were similar between groups, including pain response rates (young adults: 949/1516, 62.6%; middle-aged adults: 1848/2834, 65.2%; and older adults: 241/387, 62.3%; P=.17). CONCLUSIONS Older adults showed high adherence, engagement, and satisfaction with the DCP, which were greater than in their younger counterparts, together with significant clinical improvements in all studied outcomes. This suggests DCPs can successfully address and overcome some of the barriers surrounding the participation and adequacy of digital models in the older adult population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dora Janela
- Sword Health, Inc, Draper, UT, United States
| | | | - Robert G Moulder
- Sword Health, Inc, Draper, UT, United States
- Institute for Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
| | | | - Vijay Yanamadala
- Sword Health, Inc, Draper, UT, United States
- Department of Surgery, Frank H Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Westport, CT, United States
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Fernando Dias Correia
- Sword Health, Inc, Draper, UT, United States
- Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cui D, Janela D, Costa F, Molinos M, Areias AC, Moulder RG, Scheer JK, Bento V, Cohen SP, Yanamadala V, Correia FD. Randomized-controlled trial assessing a digital care program versus conventional physiotherapy for chronic low back pain. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6:121. [PMID: 37420107 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00870-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is the world's leading cause of years lived with disability. Digital exercise-based interventions have shown great potential in the management of musculoskeletal conditions, promoting access and easing the economic burden. However, evidence of their effectiveness for chronic LBP (CLBP) management compared to in-person physiotherapy has yet to be unequivocally established. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with CLBP following a digital intervention versus evidence-based in-person physiotherapy. Our results demonstrate that patient satisfaction and adherence were high and similar between groups, although a significantly lower dropout rate is observed in the digital group (11/70, 15.7% versus 24/70, 34.3% in the conventional group; P = 0.019). Both groups experience significant improvements in disability (primary outcome), with no differences between groups in change from baseline (median difference: -0.55, 95% CI: -2.42 to 5.81, P = 0.412) or program-end scores (-1.05, 95% CI: -4.14 to 6.37; P = 0.671). Likewise, no significant differences between groups are found for secondary outcomes (namely pain, anxiety, depression, and overall productivity impairment). This RCT demonstrates that a remote digital intervention for CLBP can promote the same levels of recovery as evidence-based in-person physiotherapy, being a potential avenue to ease the burden of CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Cui
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert G Moulder
- Institute for Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Steven P Cohen
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Vijay Yanamadala
- Department of Surgery, Quinnipiac University Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Hamden, CT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Westport, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Albers R, Lemke S, Knapp S, Krischak G, Bethge M. Non-inferiority of a hybrid outpatient rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial (HIRE, DRKS00028770). BMC DIGITAL HEALTH 2023; 1:15. [PMID: 38014366 PMCID: PMC10125254 DOI: 10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Background Physiotherapeutic telerehabilitation in various musculoskeletal and internal diseases, including back pain, might be comparable to face-to-face rehabilitation or better than non-rehabilitation. In Germany, a standardized back school for patients with chronic back pain is provided in outpatient rehabilitation centers. The effectiveness of this standardized back school was shown in a randomized controlled trial in face-to-face rehabilitation. This study examines non-inferiority of a hybrid rehabilitation applying a digital version of the standardized back school against a rehabilitation applying the face-to-face back school. Methods/design We recruit 320 patients in eight German outpatient rehabilitation centers. Patients are randomized equally to the intervention and control groups. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with back pain are included. Patients lacking a suitable private electronic device and German language skills are excluded. Both groups receive the standardized back school as part of the 3-week rehabilitation program. The control group receives the back school conventionally in face-to-face meetings within the outpatient rehabilitation center. The intervention group receives the back school online using a private electronic device. Besides the back school, the patients participate in rehabilitation programs according to the German rehabilitation guideline for patients with chronic back pain. Hence, the term "hybrid" rehabilitation for the intervention group is used. The back school consists of seven modules. We assess data at four time points: start of rehabilitation, end of rehabilitation, 3 months after the end of rehabilitation and, 12 months after the end of rehabilitation. The primary outcome is pain self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes are, amongst others, motivational self-efficacy, cognitive and behavioral pain management, and disorder and treatment knowledge. Guided interviews with patients, physicians, physiotherapists and other health experts supplement our study with qualitative data. Discussion/aim Our randomized controlled trial aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of the online back school, compared to conventional implementation of the back school. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00028770, April 05, 2022). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-023-00013-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Albers
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stella Lemke
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Sebastian Knapp
- GOREHA GmbH, Neue Schönhauser Straße 20, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Gert Krischak
- Zentrum Für Ambulante Rehabilitation, Spatenstraße 12, 88046 Friedrichshafen, Germany
| | - Matthias Bethge
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stoppok P, Frewer AL, Schweda A, Geiger S, Skoda EM, Müßgens D, Bingel U, Teufel M, Bäuerle A. Needs and Demands for eHealth Pain Management Interventions in Chronic Pain Patients. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040675. [PMID: 37109061 PMCID: PMC10144556 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Although chronic pain is a global health problem, the current care situation is often inadequate. eHealth offers many advantages as an additional option for treating chronic pain. Yet, an intervention's efficacy can only be fully exhausted if patients intend to use it. This study aims to identify the needs and demands of patients with chronic pain regarding intervention concepts and frameworks to develop specifically tailored eHealth pain management interventions. A cross-sectional study was conducted, including 338 individuals with chronic pain. Within the cohort, a distinction between a high- and a low-burden group was made. Respondents generally preferred a permanently accompanying mobile app, but the preferred content varied with group. According to the majority, interventions should be made available on smartphones, offer sessions once per week with a duration from 10 to 30 min, and be recommended by experts. These results can provide the basis for future eHealth pain management interventions tailored to the patients' needs and demands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Stoppok
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Anna-Lena Frewer
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Adam Schweda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Sheila Geiger
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Skoda
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Diana Müßgens
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Bingel
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Bäuerle
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, LVR-University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhu M, Dong D, Lo HHM, Wong SYS, Mo PKH, Sit RWS. Patient preferences in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments. Pain 2023; 164:675-689. [PMID: 36149784 PMCID: PMC10026832 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a preference-sensitive condition for which numerous treatment options are available, each with benefits and risks. Thus, patient preferences play a critical role in decision making. This study summarized evidence from discrete choice experiments (DCEs) to quantify patient preferences for CMP treatment and identified important treatment attributes. A systematic review of DCEs on patient preferences for CMP treatment was conducted. Studies were included if they used DCE to determine patient preferences for CMP. A previously described methodological assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The treatment attributes were summarized and sorted according to the frequency of citation and relative weight. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the intervention-specific attributes. A total of 15 eligible studies with 4065 participants were included. We identified "capacity to realize daily life activities," "risk of adverse events," "effectiveness in pain reduction," and "out-of-pocket cost" as important attributes. Although "treatment frequency" and "onset of treatment efficacy" were less frequently mentioned, they were also important attributes. The attribute of "risk of adverse events" was especially important for drug treatment. The "out-of-pocket cost" and "treatment location and mode" were important attributes of exercise therapy. The attributes identified in this review will inform the design of future DCE studies, facilitate the translation of measurement-based care to value-based care, and provide the rationale to promote shared decision making and patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengting Zhu
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Dong Dong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hermione Hin-Man Lo
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Phoenix Kit-Han Mo
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Regina Wing-Shan Sit
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rossetto F, Borgnis F, Isernia S, Foglia E, Garagiola E, Realdon O, Baglio F. System Integrated Digital Empowering and teleRehabilitation to promote patient Activation and well-Being in chronic disabilities: A usability and acceptability study. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1154481. [PMID: 37250091 PMCID: PMC10214955 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1154481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Telerehabilitation systems represent a promising way for the management of chronic disability, delivering technology-enabled rehabilitation outside the hospital setting. However, usability and acceptability assessment with users represents a critical starting point when using digital healthcare solutions. This study aims at evaluating the user experience with a Telerehabilitation system (SIDERA∧B) from the end-user side. Methods SIDERA∧B consists of an asynchronous delivery of rehabilitation activities through multimedia digital contents and tele-monitoring of vital parameters with technological devices for individualized, home-based management of chronic conditions. Usability (with the System Usability Scale, SUS) and acceptability (using the Technology Acceptance Model, TAM - and The Service User Technology Acceptance Questionnaire, SUTAQ) data were analyzed from the dataset of the SIDERA∧B project (N = 112 patients with Chronic Heart Failure, Parkinson's Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). The possible influence of five external factors (i.e., technological expertise, education, sex, age, and level of disability) on TAM domains was tested using Spearman's Correlation analysis. Results Results showed a satisfactory level of technological usability (SUS Median = 77.5) and good scores in usability and learnability SUS subdomains (mean scores > 2.5). Regarding technological acceptability, participants showed high scores (Median > 4) in "Behavioral Intention", "Perceived Usefulness", and "Perceived Ease of Use" TAM domains. Finally, results from the SUTAQ scale highlighted that the SIDERA∧B system obtained optimal scores in all domains, especially in "Increased accessibility," "Care personnel concerns," and "Satisfaction." Age (rho = -0.291, p = 0.002) and disability level (WHODAS Total score: rho = -0.218, p = 0.021) were the two external factors inversely associated with the Perceived Ease of Use. Discussion The age of digital transformation requires everyone to understand, accept and master the changes affecting modern-day healthcare. The usability and acceptability of the SIDERA∧B system were high across all end-users, despite the medium-low level of the technological expertise of the sample. These findings support the efficiency and the suitability of these digital solutions in the modern digital age transition of rehabilitation from inside to outside the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sara Isernia
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Foglia
- School of Industrial Engineering and Healthcare Datascience LAB, LIUC-Università Carlo Cattaneo, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Garagiola
- School of Industrial Engineering and Healthcare Datascience LAB, LIUC-Università Carlo Cattaneo, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - Olivia Realdon
- Department of Human Sciences for Education, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kushniruk A, Morken IM, Storm M, Husebø AML. Designing a Future eHealth Service for Posthospitalization Self-management Support in Long-term Illness: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2023; 10:e39391. [PMID: 36745492 PMCID: PMC9941902 DOI: 10.2196/39391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with noncommunicable diseases (NCDs; eg, heart failure [HF] and colorectal cancer [CRC]), eHealth interventions could meet their posthospital discharge needs and strengthen their ability to self-manage. However, inconclusive evidence exists regarding how to design eHealth services to meet the complex needs of patients. To foster patient acceptability and ensure the successful development and implementation of eHealth solutions, it is beneficial to include different stakeholders (ie, patients and health care professionals) in the design and development phase of such services. The involvement of different stakeholders could contribute to ensuring feasible, acceptable, and usable solutions and that eHealth services are developed in response to users' supportive care needs when transitioning to home after hospitalization. This study is the first step of a larger complex intervention study aimed at meeting the postdischarge needs of 2 NCD populations. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the perspectives of patients with HF and CRC and health care professionals on patient self-management needs following hospital discharge and investigate how a future nurse-assisted eHealth service could be best designed to foster patient acceptability, support self-management, and smooth the transition from hospital to home. METHODS A qualitative, explorative, and descriptive approach was used. We conducted 38 semistructured interviews with 10 patients with HF, 9 patients surgically treated for CRC with curative intent, 6 registered nurses recruited as nurse navigators of a planned eHealth service, and 13 general practitioners experienced in HF and CRC treatment and follow-up care. Patients were recruited conveniently from HF and CRC outpatient clinics, and the nurses were recruited from the cardiology and gastro-surgical departments at a university hospital in the southwest of Norway. The general practitioners were recruited from primary care in surrounding municipalities. Semistructured interview guides were used for data collection, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS In total, 3 main themes were derived from the data analysis: expecting information, reassurance, and guidance when using eHealth for HF and CRC self-management; expecting eHealth to be comprehensible, supportive, and knowledge promoting; and recognizing both the advantages and disadvantages of eHealth for HF and CRC self-management. The data generated from this interview study depicted the diverse needs for self-management support of patients with CRC and HF after hospital discharge. In addition, valuable suggestions were identified regarding the design and content of the eHealth service. However, participants described both possible advantages and disadvantages of a remote eHealth service. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first step in the development of an eHealth service for posthospitalization self-management support for long-term illnesses. It concerns patients' supportive care needs and user requirements of an eHealth service. The findings of this study may add value to the planning and development of eHealth interventions for patients with NCDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ingvild Margreta Morken
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.,Research Group for Health and Nursing Sciences, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marianne Storm
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Anne Marie Lunde Husebø
- Department of Public Health, University of Stavanger, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stavanger, Norway.,Research Group for Health and Nursing Sciences, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Areias AC, Costa F, Janela D, Molinos M, Moulder RG, Lains J, Scheer JK, Bento V, Yanamadala V, Cohen SP, Correia FD. Impact on productivity impairment of a digital care program for chronic low back pain: A prospective longitudinal cohort study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 63:102709. [PMID: 36543719 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability in the United States and the main reason for absenteeism. Successful management of chronic LBP (CLBP) is dependent on multimodal evidence-based interventions. Digital interventions (DI) may ease accessibility to such treatments, increasing adherence, while reducing healthcare-related costs. OBJECTIVES Assess the impact of a completely remote multimodal DI on productivity impairment in a real-work context cohort of patients with CLBP. DESIGN Longitudinal study. METHODS Ad-hoc analysis of an interventional, single-arm study of individuals with CLBP undergoing a DI for 12 weeks. Outcomes included the mean change in work productivity and activity impairment (including overall and non-work related activities), pain, depression, anxiety, fear-avoidance beliefs, analgesic usage, and engagement. Minimal clinically important change (MCIC) was calculated for productivity using anchor- and distribution-based methods. RESULTS From 560 patients at program start, 78.4% completed the DI. A significant improvement in overall productivity (20.21, 95%CI: 16.48-23.94) and in non-work related activities (21.36, 95%CI: 17.49-25.22) was observed, corresponding to a responder rate of 57.1-83.3% and 60.5-79.8%, respectively, and depending on the MCIC method. Significant improvements were reported for pain (2.32 points, 95%CI: 2.02-2.61), anxiety (5.24, 95%CI: 4.18-6.29), depression (6.38, 95%CI: 4.78-7.98) and fear-avoidance beliefs (8.11, 95%CI: 6.20-10.02). Both engagement (sessions per week) and patient satisfaction scores were high, 2.9 (SD 1.0) and 8.8/10 (SD 1.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the utility of a multimodal DI to address productivity impairment. DIs have great potential to ease the burden of CLBP, providing an accessible and cost-effective modality of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was approved by the New England IRB (protocol number 120190313) and prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04092946, on September 17th, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Robert G Moulder
- Institute for Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
| | - Jorge Lains
- Rovisco Pais Medical and Rehabilitation Centre, 3064-908, Tocha, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra University, 3004-504, Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | | | - Vijay Yanamadala
- Sword Health, Inc, UT, 84043, USA; Department of Surgery, Quinnipiac University Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Hamden, CT, 06473, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Westport, CT, 06103, USA.
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Departments of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurology, and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 21287, Baltimore, MD, USA; Departments of Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, 20814, MD, USA.
| | - Fernando Dias Correia
- Sword Health, Inc, UT, 84043, USA; Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Paul SS, Hubbard A, Johnson J, Dennis SM. Transition to a virtual model of physiotherapy and exercise physiology in response to COVID-19 for people in a rural Australia: Is it a viable solution to increase access to allied health for rural populations? PLoS One 2023; 18:e0280876. [PMID: 36662817 PMCID: PMC9858084 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Virtual healthcare has the potential to increase access to allied health for people living in rural areas, but challenges in delivery of such models have been reported. The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity for a rural practice of physiotherapists and exercise physiologists to transition service delivery to a virtual model of care which utilised a combination of phone, video, an exercise app and/or paper handouts. This study aimed to evaluate the uptake and outcomes from virtual delivery of allied health services, and to describe patient and clinician experiences of the virtual model of care. A parallel convergent mixed methods study was conducted. De-identified data from patients who were offered the virtual service between 15 March 2020 and 30 September 2020 were extracted from the database of the rural practice, as were data from patients attending the practice in-person during the same time in 2019 to serve as a historical comparison. De-identified data from a monthly survey tracking clinician experiences of delivering care virtually was also obtained from the practice. Quantitative data were presented descriptively. Between-group differences were compared using independent samples t-tests, and within-group longitudinal changes compared using paired t-tests. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among a purposive sample of patients using the virtual service, and focus groups conducted among clinicians providing this model of care. Qualitative data were recorded and transcribed verbatim, then thematic analysis conducted. During the study period, the practice delivered 4% (n = 242) consultations virtually. Thirty-seven of the 60 patients (62%) using the virtual service were new referrals. Patients attended fewer sessional appointments virtually and a smaller proportion of patients reported high satisfaction with virtual care, compared to those who received in-person care the previous year (p < .05). Clinician confidence in delivering virtual care did not change significantly over time (p>.05), though clinicians not providing virtual care in a given month perceived their lower confidence than those who did provide virtual care (p < .05). Five themes influencing the success of virtual allied health provision emerged from patient interviews and clinician focus groups: adaptation of program elements for virtual delivery, conduct of virtual treatment, clinician flexibility, patient complexity and communication. The theme of communication influenced all the other themes. Virtual healthcare is a potential solution to address lack of access to allied health practitioners in rural areas, but may not suit all patients. Establishing a therapeutic relationship and ensuring people have access to adequate resources prior to virtual care delivery will optimise successful adoption of virtual care models. A hybrid model incorporating limited in-person consultations with virtual consultations appears a more viable option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serene S. Paul
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Sarah M. Dennis
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grigorovich A, Xi M, Lam N, Pakosh M, Chan BCF. A systematic review of economic analyses of home-based telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44:8188-8200. [PMID: 34965827 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2019327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Telerehabilitation, or the delivery of rehabilitation using information and communication technologies, may improve timely and equitable access to rehabilitation services at home. A systematic literature review was conducted of studies that formally documented the costs and effects of home-based telerehabilitation versus in-person rehabilitation across all health conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 13 July 2021 (APA, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Embase, EmCare, Medline (Ovid), and PubMed) using a protocol developed by a medical librarian. A quality appraisal of full economic evaluation studies was conducted using the Drummond 10-point quality checklist. RESULTS Thirty-five studies were included in this review covering various rehabilitation types and diverse populations. The majority were published in the last six years. Available evidence suggests that telerehabilitation may result in similar or lower costs as compared to in-person rehabilitation for the health care system and for patients. However, the impact of telerehabilitation on long-term clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS More high quality and robust economic evaluations exploring the short- and long-term costs and other impacts of telerehabilitation on patients, caregivers, and health care systems across all types of patient populations are still required.Implications for rehabilitationHome-based telerehabilitation may reduce barriers in access to care for individuals living in the community.Economic analyses can inform health care system decision-making by evaluating the costs and effects associated with telerehabilitation.This study found that telerehabilitation may result in similar or lower costs as in-person rehabilitation; however, its impact on health-related quality of life is unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisa Grigorovich
- Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.,KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Min Xi
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Natascha Lam
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Maureen Pakosh
- Library & Information Services, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Brian C F Chan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Knoerl R, Berry D, Meyerhardt JA, Reyes K, Salehi E, Thornton K, Gewandter JS. Identifying participants' preferences for modifiable chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy prevention clinical trial factors: an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9963-9973. [PMID: 36355216 PMCID: PMC9648439 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07447-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are no recommended treatments for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) prevention. Recruitment to CIPN prevention clinical trials is challenging because it is difficult to enroll patients between the time of cancer diagnosis and the initiation of neurotoxic chemotherapy. The purpose of this exploratory-sequential mixed-methods study was to determine patients' preferences that could affect the choice to participate in CIPN prevention clinical trials. METHODS First, twenty cognitive interviews were conducted with adults who completed less than three neurotoxic chemotherapy infusions to clarify clinical trial attributes and levels thought to be important to patients when deciding whether to enroll in CIPN prevention trials (i.e., type of treatment, clinical tests, reimbursement, survey delivery; length of visits, timing of follow-up, when to begin treatment). Second, another eighty-eight patients completed an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis survey that incorporated the finalized attributes and levels. Each level was assigned a part-worth utility score using Hierarchical Bayes Estimation. The relative importance of each attribute was calculated. RESULTS The attributes with the highest relative importance values were type of treatment (27.1%) and length of study visits (20.2%). The preferred levels included non-medicine treatment (53.49%), beginning treatment after experiencing CIPN (60.47%), email surveys (63.95%), assessments that include surveys and clinical exams (39.53%), under 30-min visits (44.19%), $50/week reimbursement (39.53%), and 1-month post-chemotherapy follow-up visits (32.56%). CONCLUSIONS Patients' preferences for participation may be included in the design of future CIPN prevention clinical trials to potentially bolster study enrollment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Knoerl
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave LW518, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
- Present Address: University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls St, Office 2350;, MI, 48109, Ann Arbor, USA.
| | - Donna Berry
- Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | | | - Kaitlen Reyes
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Elahe Salehi
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Katherine Thornton
- Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer S Gewandter
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hensen B, Winkelmann C, Wacker FK, Vogt B, Dewald CLA, Neumann T. Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT): a maximum-difference-scaling analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19143. [PMID: 36351993 PMCID: PMC9646805 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23097-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The Identification of Relevant Attributes for Liver Cancer Therapies (IRALCT) project is intended to provide new insights into the relevant utility attributes regarding therapy choices for malignant primary and secondary liver tumors from the perspective of those who are involved in the decision-making process. It addresses the potential value of taking patients' expectations and preferences into account during the decision-making and, when possible, adapting therapies according to these preferences. Specifically, it is intended to identify the relevant clinical attributes that influence the patients', medical laymen's, and medical professionals' decisions and compare the three groups' preferences. We conducted maximum difference (MaxDiff) scaling among 261 participants (75 physicians, 97 patients with hepatic malignancies, and 89 medical laymen) to rank the importance of 14 attributes previously identified through a literature review. We evaluated the MaxDiff data using count analysis and hierarchical Bayes estimation (HB). Physicians, patients, and medical laymen assessed the same 7 attributes as the most important: probability (certainty) of a complete removal of the tumor, probability of reoccurrence of the disease, pathological evidence of tumor removal, possible complications during the medical intervention, welfare after the medical intervention, duration and intensity of the pain, and degree of difficulty of the medical intervention. The cumulative relative importance of these 7 attributes was 88.3%. Our results show that the physicians', patients', and medical laymen's preferences were very similar and stable.Trial registration DRKS-ID of the study: DRKS00013304, Date of Registration in DRKS: 2017/11/16.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bennet Hensen
- grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Otto-Hahn-Straße 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany ,grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Carolin Winkelmann
- grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Otto-Hahn-Straße 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany ,grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307Chair in Empirical Economics, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Frank K. Wacker
- grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Otto-Hahn-Straße 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany ,grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Bodo Vogt
- grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Otto-Hahn-Straße 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany ,grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307Chair in Empirical Economics, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany ,grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307Chair in Health Economics, Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Cornelia L. A. Dewald
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Neumann
- grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Otto-Hahn-Straße 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany ,grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307Chair in Empirical Economics, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany ,grid.5807.a0000 0001 1018 4307University Department of Neurology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany ,grid.5836.80000 0001 2242 8751Chair in Health Services Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Siegen, Am Eichenhang 50, 57076 Siegen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Coulibaly LP, Poder TG, Tousignant M. Attributes Underlying Patient Choice for Telerehabilitation Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review to Support a Discrete Choice Experiment Study Design. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:1991-2002. [PMID: 34861762 PMCID: PMC9808290 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Across most healthcare systems, patients are the primary focus. Patient involvements enhance their adherence to treatment, which in return, influences their health. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics (ie, attributes) and associated levels (ie, values of the characteristics) that are the most important for patients regarding telerehabilitation (TR) healthcare to support a future discrete choice experiment (DCE) study design. METHODS A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted from January 2005 to the end of July 2020 and the search strategy was applied to five different databases. The initial selection of articles that met the eligibility criteria was independently made by one researcher, two researchers verified the accuracy of the extracted data, and all researchers discussed about relevant variables to include. Reporting of this systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of the study. A qualitative synthesis was used to summarize findings. RESULTS From a total of 928 articles, 11 (qualitative [n = 5], quantitative [n = 3] and mixed-methods [n = 3] design) were included, and 25 attributes were identified and grouped into 13 categories: Accessibility, Distance, Interaction, Technology experience, Treatment mode, Treatment location, Physician contact mode, Physician contact frequency, Cost, Confidence, Ease of use, Feeling safer, and Training session. The attributes levels varied from two to five. The DCE studies identified showed the main stages to undertake these types of studies. CONCLUSION This study could guide the development of interview grid for individual interviews and focus groups to support a DCE study design in the TR field. By understanding the characteristics that enhance patients' preferences, healthcare providers can create or improve TR programs that provide high-quality and accessible care. Future research via a DCE is needed to determine the relative importance of the attributes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucien P. Coulibaly
- Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Thomas G. Poder
- Département de Gestion, Évaluation et Politique de Santé, École de santé publique de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Michel Tousignant
- Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche sur le Vieillissement, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Moulaei K, Sheikhtaheri A, Nezhad MS, Haghdoost A, Gheysari M, Bahaadinbeigy K. Telerehabilitation for upper limb disabilities: a scoping review on functions, outcomes, and evaluation methods. Arch Public Health 2022; 80:196. [PMID: 35999548 PMCID: PMC9400266 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-00952-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Upper limb (UL) disabilities have attracted worldwide attention due to the high economic costs of health care and the negative effects on the quality of life of patients with these disabilities. Telerehabilitation technologies are one of the most important ways to reduce rehabilitation costs and increase the quality of life of patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of telerehabilitation in improving the health status of patients with upper limb disabilities.
Methods
This scoping review was conducted by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus until July 30, 2021. We used a data extraction form with 18 fields to extract data from primary studies. The selection of articles and data extraction was made by four researchers using a data collection form based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved through consultation with the fifth and sixth researchers.Inclusion criteria were studies published in English, studies on upper limb disability, and telerehabilitation based on any technology (synchronous telerehabilitation, asynchronous, or both). Exclusion criteria were articles that did not focus on telerehabilitation and upper limb disabilities. Also, books, book chapters, letters to the editor, and conference abstracts were also removed.
Results
A total of 458 articles were retrieved, and after removing irrelevant and duplicate articles, 29 articles were finally included in this review. Most telerehabilitation was performed for patients with stroke (65%). Among the 15 different services provided with telerehabilitation technologies, "Evaluation of exercises and also a musculoskeletal function of patients by the therapist","Recording of patients' rehabilitation exercises and sending them to the therapist” and "Prescribing new rehabilitation exercises by the therapist" were the most widely used services, respectively. Virtual reality technologies, smart wearables, and robots were used to provide telerehabilitation services. Among the 13 types of evaluation used for telerehabilitation systems, “Evaluation and measurement of upper limb function” was the most used evaluation in the studies. "Improvement in musculoskeletal functions”, "Increasing patients' interest and motivation to perform rehabilitation exercises", and "Increasing adherence to rehabilitation exercises and greater participation in treatment processes" were the most important outcomes, respectively.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that telerehabilitation provides individuals with equitable access to rehabilitation services, improves musculoskeletal function, and empowers individuals by providing a variety of rehabilitation capabilities.
Collapse
|
26
|
Chapel B, Alexandre F, Heraud N, Ologeanu-Taddei R, Cases AS, Bughin F, Hayot M. Standardization of the assessment process within telerehabilitation in chronic diseases: a scoping meta-review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:984. [PMID: 35918690 PMCID: PMC9344755 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08370-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Telerehabilitation (TR) interventions are receiving increasing attention. They have been evaluated in various scientific areas through systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of data on how to standardize assessment and report on their domains to guide researchers across studies and bring together the best evidence to assess TR for chronic diseases. Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to identify domains of assessment in TR and to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze how and when they are examined to gain an overview of assessment in chronic disease. Methods A scoping meta-review was carried out on 9 databases and gray literature from 2009 to 2019. The keyword search strategy was based on "telerehabilitation", “evaluation", “chronic disease" and their synonyms. All articles were subjected to qualitative analysis using the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Core Model prior to further analysis and narrative synthesis. Results Among the 7412 identified articles, 80 studies met the inclusion criteria and addressed at least one of the noncommunicable diseases (NCD) categories of cardiovascular disease (cardiovascular accidents), cancer, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes, and obesity. Regarding the domains of assessment, the most frequently occurring were “social aspect” (n = 63, 79%) (e.g., effects on behavioral changes) and “clinical efficacy” (n = 53, 66%), and the least frequently occurring was “safety aspects” (n = 2, 3%). We also identified the phases of TR in which the assessment was conducted and found that it most commonly occurred in the pilot study and randomized trial phases and least commonly occurred in the design, pretest, and post-implementation phases. Conclusions Through the HTA model, this scoping meta-review highlighted 10 assessment domains which have not been studied with the same degree of interest in the recent literature. We showed that each of these assessment domains could appear at different phases of TR development and proposed a new cross-disciplinary and comprehensive method for assessing TR interventions. Future studies will benefit from approaches that leverage the best evidence regarding the assessment of TR, and it will be interesting to extend this assessment framework to other chronic diseases. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08370-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blandine Chapel
- University of Montpellier, Montpellier Research of Management, Montpellier, France.
| | - François Alexandre
- Direction de La Recherche Clinique Et de L'Innovation en Santé, Korian ; GCS CIPS, 800 Avenue Joseph Vallot, Lodève, France
| | - Nelly Heraud
- Direction de La Recherche Clinique Et de L'Innovation en Santé, Korian ; GCS CIPS, 800 Avenue Joseph Vallot, Lodève, France
| | | | - Anne-Sophie Cases
- University of Montpellier, Montpellier Research of Management, Montpellier, France
| | - François Bughin
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Maurice Hayot
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM, CNRS, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Participation in Low Back Pain Management: It Is Time for the To-Be Scenarios in Digital Public Health. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19137805. [PMID: 35805463 PMCID: PMC9265691 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) carries a high risk of chronicization and disability, greatly impacting the overall demand for care and costs, and its treatment is at risk of scarce adherence. This work introduces a new scenario based on the use of a mobile health tool, the Dress-KINESIS, to support the traditional rehabilitation approach. The tool proposes targeted self-manageable exercise plans for improving pain and disability, but it also monitors their efficacy. Since LBP prevention is the key strategy, the tool also collects real-patient syndromic information, shares valid educational messages and fosters self-determined motivation to exercise. Our analysis is based on a comparison of the performance of the traditional rehabilitation process for non-specific LBP patients and some different scenarios, designed by including the Dress-KINESIS’s support in the original process. The results of the simulations show that the integrated approach leads to a better capacity for taking on patients while maintaining the same physiotherapists’ effort and costs, and it decreases healthcare costs during the two years following LBP onset. These findings suggest that the healthcare system should shift the paradigm towards citizens’ participation and the digital support, with the aim of improving its efficiency and citizens’ quality of life.
Collapse
|
28
|
Graber J, Lockhart S, Matlock DD, Stevens-Lapsley J, Kittelson AJ. "This is not negotiable. You need to do this…": A directed content analysis of decision making in rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty. J Eval Clin Pract 2022; 28:99-107. [PMID: 34121294 PMCID: PMC8669003 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To understand patients' and physical therapists' perspectives related to decision making during outpatient rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to describe potential barriers and opportunities for shared decision making (SDM) in this setting. METHODS A qualitative study examined the beliefs, thoughts, and experiences of patients and physical therapists regarding decision making in outpatient rehabilitation after TKA. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using directed content analysis. RESULTS Thirty-five participants were interviewed (20 patients, 15 physical therapists). Three main themes emerged from the data: (1) there is variability among physical therapists in how patients are involved in care decisions, (2) several features of the outpatient care paradigm are not supportive of SDM, and (3) preoperative patient-clinician interactions may facilitate SDM in postoperative rehabilitation, but these interactions are not typically utilized. CONCLUSION Physical therapists described using decision-making strategies with varying levels of patient involvement. Both patients and physical therapists described barriers to routine use of SDM in the outpatient setting. Several actionable strategies for overcoming these barriers were identified for providers and organizations seeking to consistently use SDM in outpatient TKA rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Graber
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Steven Lockhart
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley
- Physical Therapy Program, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,VA Eastern Colorado Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Andrew J Kittelson
- School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kelly M, Fullen B, Martin D, McMahon S, McVeigh JG. eHealth Interventions to Support Self-Management in People With Musculoskeletal Disorders, "eHealth: It's TIME"-A Scoping Review. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6506314. [PMID: 35079826 PMCID: PMC8994513 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE eHealth-mediated interventions have been proposed as one option to support self-management in those with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This scoping review aimed to chart the evidence regarding eHealth modalities, musculoskeletal diagnosis, and outcomes of eHealth-mediated self-management support interventions in persons with MSDs and identify any gaps within the literature. METHODS Six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), 7 grey literature sources (eg, OpenGrey), and reference and citation lists of included studies were searched from database inception to July 2020. Published studies of adult participants with a MSD utilizing an eHealth intervention to support self-management were included. Studies were limited to those published in English. Two reviewers independently screened all studies. Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and reviewed by another reviewer. RESULTS After screening 3377 titles and abstracts followed by 176 full texts, 87 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. The majority were published in the last 5 years (n = 48; 55%), with almost one-third originating in the United States (n = 28; 32%). The most common eHealth modality type was internet based (n = 22; 35%), with almost one-half (n = 41; 47%) of the included studies involving participants with widespread musculoskeletal symptoms. The most commonly reported outcomes were related to body functions (ie, pain intensity) (n = 67; 45%), closely followed by activities and participation (ie, function) (n = 65; 44%), with environmental factors (ie, health care utilization) the least commonly reported (n = 17; 20%). CONCLUSIONS There is considerable variation within the eHealth-mediated self-management support intervention literature. Research is needed on the role of eHealth-mediated self-management support interventions across a broad range of MSDs to guide clinical practice. IMPACT This scoping review has identified gaps in the literature relating to specific eHealth modalities, musculoskeletal diagnoses, and health care utilization data, which should guide future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kelly
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland,Department of Physiotherapy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland,Address all correspondence to Marie Kelly at:
| | - Brona Fullen
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis Martin
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom,NIHR Applied Research Collaborative, North East and North Cumbria, United Kingdom
| | - Sinéad McMahon
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joseph G McVeigh
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, School of Clinical Therapies, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Spindler H, Dyrvig AK, Schacksen CS, Anthonimuthu D, Frost L, Gade JD, Kronborg SH, Mahboubi K, Refsgaard J, Dinesen B, Hollingdal M, Kayser L. Increased motivation for and use of digital services in heart failure patients participating in a telerehabilitation program: a randomized controlled trial. Mhealth 2022; 8:25. [PMID: 35928510 PMCID: PMC9343969 DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-21-56] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND eHealth literacy (eHL) may be an important factor in the adoption of telerehabilitation. However, little is known about how telerehabilitation affects patients' eHL. The current study evaluated changes over time in eHL for heart failure (HF) patients in a telerehabilitation program (the Future Patient Program) compared to a traditional rehabilitation program. METHODS As part of a randomized controlled trial comparing telerehabilitation with traditional rehabilitation, 137 HF patients completed the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) at 6 and 12 months of their respective rehabilitation programs. RESULTS At 6 months, the telerehabilitation group indicated higher levels of 'using technology to process health information' and 'motivated to engage with digital services'. This difference was consistent over time, and we found no other differences between groups or over time with regard to eHL. CONCLUSIONS Providing a digital toolbox for processing health information to HF patients may aid in increasing their eHL, motivation, and ability to engage with digital services in HF patients. Especially, if the technology is designed to support patient needs in terms of the educational content of the program. Preferably technology should be provided early on in the rehabilitation process to ensure optimal outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03388918).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helle Spindler
- Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne-Kirstine Dyrvig
- The Danish Clinical Quality Program – National Clinical Registries (RKKP), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Cathrine Skov Schacksen
- Laboratory for Welfare Technologies – Digital Health & Rehabilitation, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Danny Anthonimuthu
- Laboratory for Welfare Technologies – Digital Health & Rehabilitation, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars Frost
- Cardiology Ward, Regional Hospital in Silkeborg, Silkeborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Josefine Dam Gade
- Laboratory for Welfare Technologies – Digital Health & Rehabilitation, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Sissel Højsted Kronborg
- Laboratory for Welfare Technologies – Digital Health & Rehabilitation, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Jens Refsgaard
- Cardiology Ward, Regional Hospital in Viborg, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Birthe Dinesen
- Laboratory for Welfare Technologies – Digital Health & Rehabilitation, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Kayser
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Effect of Physical Therapy Modalities on Quality of Life of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10204696. [PMID: 34682818 PMCID: PMC8539984 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective was to describe the effectiveness of different physical therapy modalities to improve Quality of Life (QoL) in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) survivors. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized clinical controlled trials published until 30 April 2020. Risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis were conducted using the Cochrane tools. A total of 251 records were retrieved, and 10 met the inclusion criteria. Interventions whose parameters focus on a 12-week exercise programs of aerobic activity (walking) or Progressive Resistance Training (PRT) for the whole body are effective and safe modalities improving QoL in HNC survivors. Electrophysical agents did not show significant results between groups. As for the assessment of methodological quality, 4 of the 10 articles included had a high risk of overall bias. Only five articles provided sufficient information to conduct a meta-analysis for exercise program intervention on QoL, showing a tendency in favor of intervention group, even when the global results did not show statistically significant improvements (pooled Cohen's d 0.15; 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.54; I2 45.87%; p heterogeneity = 0.10). The present review and meta-analysis identified meaningful benefits of exercise on QoL of HNC survivors; this has been confirmed in a meta-analysis. This review adds evidence supporting exercise interventions on Head and Neck Cancer population whose opportunities for successful recovery after medical treatment are more limited.
Collapse
|
32
|
Iqbal MH. Telemedicine: An Innovative Twist to Primary Health Care in Rural Bangladesh. J Prim Care Community Health 2021; 11:2150132720950519. [PMID: 32865108 PMCID: PMC7457686 DOI: 10.1177/2150132720950519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care service is worsening in the remote villages due to less complete and further away of healthcare facilities and service and makes this service costs compared to those of urban people. Telemedicine service provides a potential solution regarding this particular issue. This study provides empirical evidence of the benefits package consists of hypothetical telemedicine service and evaluates the economic benefit of telemedicine service. METHODS The study measures marginal willingness-to-pay (MWTP) responses to policy change on a sample (n = 203) observations. A randomized conjoint experiment has conducted in 7 remote villages of 3 coastal districts of the southwest coastal region of Bangladesh. Each respondent ranks 3 options-two hypothetical alternatives and the telemedicine status quo scheme. The level of attributes-payment for telemedicine service, sample collection from home, medicine delivery to home, capitation through online technology, service delivery frequency, and blood pressure and glucose measure at home-are randomly and jointly assigned to the 2 alternatives. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Coastal villagers would like to pay more in option 4 and above. The lower payment for telemedicine service does not necessarily imply low demand for telemedicine, as the findings from MWTP illustrate potential demand for telemedicine in coastal villages in Bangladesh.
Collapse
|
33
|
Assenza C, Catania H, Antenore C, Gobbetti T, Gentili P, Paolucci S, Morelli D. Continuity of Care During COVID-19 Lockdown: A Survey on Stakeholders' Experience With Telerehabilitation. Front Neurol 2021; 11:617276. [PMID: 33519697 PMCID: PMC7838679 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.617276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To explore professionals', adult patients', and children's caregivers' perception and satisfaction with telerehabilitation during COVID-19 lockdown. Design: An observational transversal study on a web-based survey was conducted in order to explore participants' perception and satisfaction of telerehabilitation during COVID-19 lockdown. Setting: The study was conducted at our Outpatient Neurorehabilitation Service. Subjects: All rehabilitation professionals, adult patients, and children's caregivers who accepted telerehabilitation were recruited. Interventions: Participants had to respond to the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 and to a purpose-built questionnaire on their perception and satisfaction of the service provided. Main Measures: Data were analyzed by qualitative statistics and logistic regression models. Results: All 144 caregivers, 25 adult patients, and 50 professionals reported a medium-high level of perception and a high level of satisfaction. Results showed a correlation among caregivers of children aged 0-3 and feeling overwhelmed with remote care (OR = 3.27), a low perception of telerehabilitation for enhancing goals (OR = 6.51), and a high perception of feeling helped in organizing daily activity (OR = 2.96). For caregivers of children aged over 6 years, changes in the therapy plan were related to a low perception of feeling in line with the in-person therapy (OR = 2.61 and OR = 9.61) and a low satisfaction (OR = 5.54 and OR = 4.97). Changes in therapy were related to concern (OR = 4.20). Caregivers under 40 and professionals showed a high probability to perceive telerehabilitation as supportive (OR = 2.27 and OR = 5.68). Level of experience with remote media was shown to influence perception and satisfaction. Interpretation: Telerehabilitation can be a useful practice both during a health emergency and in addition to in-presence therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Assenza
- Neurorehabilitation Outpatient Department, Santa Lucia Foundation (Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care), Rome, Italy
| | - Hilenia Catania
- Neurorehabilitation Outpatient Department, Santa Lucia Foundation (Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care), Rome, Italy
| | - Clementina Antenore
- Neurorehabilitation Outpatient Department, Santa Lucia Foundation (Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care), Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Gobbetti
- Neurorehabilitation Outpatient Department, Santa Lucia Foundation (Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care), Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Gentili
- Neurorehabilitation Outpatient Department, Santa Lucia Foundation (Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care), Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Paolucci
- Clinical Laboratory of Experimental Neurorehabilitation, Santa Lucia Foundation (Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care), Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Morelli
- Neurorehabilitation Outpatient Department, Santa Lucia Foundation (Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Busso C, Castorina G, Di Monaco M, Rodriguez D, Mahdavi H, Balocco S, Trucco M, Conti M, Castagna A, Minetto MA. Effectiveness of a home-based telerehabilitation system in patients after total hip arthroplasty: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:852. [PMID: 33054811 PMCID: PMC7556916 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04791-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is quickly rising given the escalating global incidence of hip osteoarthritis, and it is widely accepted that the post-surgery rehabilitation is key to optimize outcomes. The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new telerehabilitation solution, ReHub, for the physical function and clinical outcome improvement following THA. The specific aims of this manuscript are to describe the study design, protocol, content of interventions, and primary and secondary outcomes and to discuss the clinical rehabilitation impact of the expected experimental results. Methods/design This prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial will include 56 patients who had undergone primary THA. Patients are randomized to a control group (standard rehabilitation during the 2-week stay in the rehabilitation clinic followed by 3 weeks of unsupervised home-based rehabilitation) or an experimental group (standard rehabilitation during the 2-week stay in the rehabilitation clinic followed by 3 weeks of home-based ReHub-assisted telerehabilitation). The primary outcome is physical performance assessed through the Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) test. Secondary outcomes include independence level, pain intensity, hip disability, hip range of motion, muscle strength, and patient’s perception of clinical improvement. Discussion Proving the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a home-based telerehabilitation program for physical and muscle function following THA could support its systematic incorporation in post-surgical rehabilitation protocols, which should be tailored to the individual and collective needs. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04176315. Registered on 22 November 2019
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Busso
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.so Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Castorina
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.so Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Di Monaco
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Presidio Sanitario San Camillo, Fondazione Opera San Camillo, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Hadis Mahdavi
- DyCare - Bio-Sensing Solutions S.L., Barcelona, Spain
| | - Simone Balocco
- Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Trucco
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Presidio Sanitario San Camillo, Fondazione Opera San Camillo, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Conti
- MediSport, Human Performance Lab - Como and Varese, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Marco Alessandro Minetto
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.so Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Vaish H. Letter to the Editor: Tele-rehabilitation of Back Pain Patients in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Asian Spine J 2020; 14:590-591. [PMID: 32791770 PMCID: PMC7435308 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2020.0358.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hina Vaish
- Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, India
- Corresponding author: Hina Vaish Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, 133207, India Tel: +91-9450124758, E-mail: ;
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nittas V, Mütsch M, Puhan MA. Preferences for Sun Protection With a Self-Monitoring App: Protocol of a Discrete Choice Experiment Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e16087. [PMID: 32130187 PMCID: PMC7055859 DOI: 10.2196/16087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of sun-exposure-related skin conditions, such as melanoma, is a gradually increasing and largely preventable public health problem. Simultaneously, the availability of mobile apps that enable the self-monitoring of health behavior and outcomes is ever increasing. Inevitably, recent years have seen an emerging volume of electronic patient-generated health data (PGHD), as well as their targeted application across primary prevention areas, including sun protection and skin health. Despite their preventive potential, the actual impact of these apps relies on the engagement of health care consumers, who are primarily responsible for recording, sharing, and using their PGHD. Exploring preferences is a key step toward facilitating consumer engagement and ultimately realizing their potential. OBJECTIVE This paper describes an ongoing research project that aims to elicit the preferences of health care consumers for sun protection via app-based self-monitoring. METHODS A discrete choice experiment (DCE) will be conducted to explore how healthy consumers choose between two alternative preventive self-monitoring apps. DCE development and attribute selection were built on extensive qualitative work, consisting of the secondary use of a previously conducted scoping review, a rapid review of reviews, 13 expert interviews, and 12 health care consumer interviews, the results of which are reported in this paper. Following D-optimality criteria, a fractional factorial survey design was generated. The final DCE will be administered in the waiting room of a travel clinic, targeting a sample of 200 participants. Choice data will be analyzed with conditional logit and multinomial logit models, accounting for individual participant characteristics. RESULTS An ethics approval was waived by the Ethics Committee Zurich. The study started in September 2019 and estimated data collection and completion is set for January 2020. Five two-level attributes have been selected for inclusion in the DCE, addressing (1) data generation methods, (2) privacy control, (3) data sharing with general practitioner, (4) reminder timing, and (5) costs. Data synthesis, analysis, and reporting are planned for January and February 2020. Results are expected to be submitted for publication by February 2020. CONCLUSIONS Our results will target technology developers, health care providers, and policy makers, potentially offering some guidance on how to design or use sun-protection-focused self-monitoring apps in ways that are responsive to consumer preferences. Preferences are ultimately linked to engagement and motivation, which are key elements for the uptake and success of digital health. Our findings will inform the design of person-centered apps, while also inspiring future preference-eliciting research in the field of emerging and complex eHealth services. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/16087.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Nittas
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Margot Mütsch
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Milo Alan Puhan
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ledel Solem IK, Varsi C, Eide H, Kristjansdottir OB, Børøsund E, Schreurs KMG, Waxenberg LB, Weiss KE, Morrison EJ, Haaland-Øverby M, Bevan K, Zangi HA, Stubhaug A, Solberg Nes L. A User-Centered Approach to an Evidence-Based Electronic Health Pain Management Intervention for People With Chronic Pain: Design and Development of EPIO. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e15889. [PMID: 31961331 PMCID: PMC7001051 DOI: 10.2196/15889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain conditions are complicated and challenging to live with. Electronic health (eHealth) interventions show promise in helping people cope with chronic illness, including pain. The success of these interventions depends not only on the technology and intervention content but also on the users’ acceptance and adherence. Involving all stakeholders (eg, patients, spouses, health care providers, designers, software developers, and researchers) and exploring their input and preferences in the design and development process is an important step toward developing meaningful interventions and possibly strengthening treatment outcomes. Objective The aim of this study was to design and develop a user-centered, evidence-based eHealth self-management intervention for people with chronic pain. Methods The study employed a multidisciplinary and user-centered design approach. Overall, 20 stakeholders from the project team (ie, 7 researchers, 5 editors, 7 software developers, and 1 user representative), together with 33 external stakeholders (ie, 12 health care providers, 1 health care manger, 1 eHealth research psychologist, and 17 patients with chronic pain and 2 of their spouses) participated in a user-centered development process that included workshops, intervention content development, and usability testing. Intervention content was developed and finalized based on existing evidence, stakeholder input, and user testing. Stakeholder input was examined through qualitative analyses with rapid and in-depth analysis approaches. Results Analyses from stakeholder input identified themes including a need for reliable, trustworthy, and evidence-based content, personalization, options for feedback, behavioral tracking, and self-assessment/registration as factors to include in the intervention. Evidence-based intervention content development resulted in one face-to-face introduction session and 9 app-based educational and exercise-based modules. Usability testing provided further insight into how to optimize the design of the intervention to the user group, identifying accessibility and a simple design to be essential. Conclusions The design and development process of eHealth interventions should strive to combine well-known evidence-based concepts with stakeholder input. This study, designing and developing the pain management intervention EPIO, illustrates how a stakeholder-centered design approach can provide essential input in the development of an eHealth self-management intervention for people with chronic pain. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03705104; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03705104
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Konstanse Ledel Solem
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Eide
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Science Centre Health and Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Olöf Birna Kristjansdottir
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karlein M G Schreurs
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Lori B Waxenberg
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Karen E Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Eleshia J Morrison
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Mette Haaland-Øverby
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Katherine Bevan
- Center for Learning and Mastery, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway
| | - Heidi Andersen Zangi
- National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Audun Stubhaug
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Regional Advisory Unit on Pain, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lise Solberg Nes
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Welche Erwartungen haben Rehabilitanden an eine telemedizinische kardiologische Reha-Nachsorge? Ergebnisse aus Interviews mit Rehabilitanden. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2019; 143:43-48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
40
|
Ledel Solem IK, Varsi C, Eide H, Kristjansdottir OB, Mirkovic J, Børøsund E, Haaland-Øverby M, Heldal K, Schreurs KM, Waxenberg LB, Weiss KE, Morrison EJ, Solberg Nes L. Patients' Needs and Requirements for eHealth Pain Management Interventions: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e13205. [PMID: 30877780 PMCID: PMC6462891 DOI: 10.2196/13205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A growing body of evidence supports the potential effectiveness of electronic health (eHealth) interventions in managing chronic pain. However, research on the needs and preferences of patients with chronic pain in relation to eHealth interventions is scarce. Eliciting user input in the development of eHealth interventions may be a crucial step toward developing meaningful interventions for patients for potentially improving treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients with chronic pain with regard to information and communication technology, understand how an eHealth intervention can support the everyday needs and challenges of patients with chronic pain, and identify possible facilitators and barriers for patients' use of an eHealth pain management intervention. METHODS Twenty patients living with chronic pain and five spouses participated in individual interviews. Semistructured interview guides were used to explore participants' needs, experiences, and challenges in daily life as well as their information and communication technology experiences and preferences for eHealth support interventions. Spouses were recruited and interviewed to gain additional insight into the patients' needs. The study used qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS The participants were generally experienced technology users and reported using apps regularly. They were mainly in favor of using an eHealth self-management intervention for chronic pain and considered it a potentially acceptable way of gathering knowledge and support for pain management. The participants expressed the need for obtaining more information and knowledge, establishing a better balance in everyday life, and receiving support for improving communication and social participation. They provided suggestions for the eHealth intervention content and functionality to address these needs. Accessibility, personalization, and usability were emphasized as important elements for an eHealth support tool. The participants described an ideal eHealth intervention as one that could be used for support and distraction from pain, at any time or in any situation, regardless of varying pain intensity and concentration capacity. CONCLUSIONS This study provides insight into user preferences for eHealth interventions aiming to address self-management for chronic pain. Participants highlighted important factors to be considered when designing and developing eHealth interventions for self-management of chronic pain, illustrating the importance and benefit of including users in the development of eHealth interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03705104; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03705104.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Konstanse Ledel Solem
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Eide
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Science Centre Health and Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Olöf Birna Kristjansdottir
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jelena Mirkovic
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Haaland-Øverby
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karina Heldal
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karlein Mg Schreurs
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Lori B Waxenberg
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Florida, FL, United States
| | - Karen Elizabeth Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Washington, WA, United States
| | | | - Lise Solberg Nes
- Center for Shared Decision Making and Collaborative Care Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Telerehabilitation refers to the virtual delivery of rehabilitation services into the patient's home. This methodology has shown to be advantageous when used to enhance or replace conventional therapy to overcome geographic, physical, and cognitive barriers. The exponential growth of technology has led to the development of new applications that enable health care providers to monitor, educate, treat, and support patients in their own environment. Best practices and well-designed Telerehabilitation studies are needed to build and sustain a strong Telerehabilitation system that is integrated in the current health care structure and is cost-effective.
Collapse
|
42
|
Spindler H, Leerskov K, Joensson K, Nielsen G, Andreasen JJ, Dinesen B. Conventional Rehabilitation Therapy Versus Telerehabilitation in Cardiac Patients: A Comparison of Motivation, Psychological Distress, and Quality of Life. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16030512. [PMID: 30759761 PMCID: PMC6388222 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Telerehabilitation (TR) has gained attention as a promising rehabilitation format. Our study examined how patients responded to TR and whether it provided adequate support for their lifestyle changes and self-care efforts when compared to conventional rehabilitation (CR). Cardiac patients (n = 136) were randomly assigned to a TR or CR group. The TR group was provided with relevant health care technology for a period of three months, and both groups filled in questionnaires on their motivation for lifestyle changes and self-care psychological distress, and quality of life at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients in both groups were found to be equally motivated for lifestyle changes and self-care (p < 0.05) and they experienced similar levels of psychological distress and quality of life. TR is comparable to conventional rehabilitation in motivating patients, preventing psychological distress and improving quality of life. Although we observed an initial increase in autonomous motivation in the telerehabilitation group, this positive difference in motivation does not last over time. As such, neither rehabilitation format seems able to ensure long-term motivation. Therefore, TR may serve as a viable replacement for conventional rehabilitation when considered relevant. Further research is needed to enhance long-term motivation, and maybe telerehabilitation can help to achieve this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helle Spindler
- Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Kasper Leerskov
- SMI®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9200 Aalborg East, Denmark.
| | - Katrine Joensson
- Department of Micro- and Nanotechnology, The Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
| | - Gitte Nielsen
- Department of Cardiology, Vendsyssel Hospital, 9800 Hjoerring, Denmark.
| | - Jan Jesper Andreasen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Birthe Dinesen
- Laboratory of Welfare Technologies - Telehealth and Telerehabilitation, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, 9200 Aalborg East, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob EW, Ellis AR, Vass CM. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2019; 37:201-226. [PMID: 30392040 PMCID: PMC6386055 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 387] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly advocated as a way to quantify preferences for health. However, increasing support does not necessarily result in increasing quality. Although specific reviews have been conducted in certain contexts, there exists no recent description of the general state of the science of health-related DCEs. The aim of this paper was to update prior reviews (1990-2012), to identify all health-related DCEs and to provide a description of trends, current practice and future challenges. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify health-related empirical DCEs published between 2013 and 2017. The search strategy and data extraction replicated prior reviews to allow the reporting of trends, although additional extraction fields were incorporated. RESULTS Of the 7877 abstracts generated, 301 studies met the inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. In general, the total number of DCEs per year continued to increase, with broader areas of application and increased geographic scope. Studies reported using more sophisticated designs (e.g. D-efficient) with associated software (e.g. Ngene). The trend towards using more sophisticated econometric models also continued. However, many studies presented sophisticated methods with insufficient detail. Qualitative research methods continued to be a popular approach for identifying attributes and levels. CONCLUSIONS The use of empirical DCEs in health economics continues to grow. However, inadequate reporting of methodological details inhibits quality assessment. This may reduce decision-makers' confidence in results and their ability to act on the findings. How and when to integrate health-related DCE outcomes into decision-making remains an important area for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikas Soekhai
- Section of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, 3000 CA The Netherlands
| | - Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
- Section of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR The Netherlands
| | - Alan R. Ellis
- Department of Social Work, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC USA
| | - Caroline M. Vass
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Schramm K, Grassl N, Nees J, Hoffmann J, Stepan H, Bruckner T, Haun MW, Maatouk I, Haist M, Schott TC, Sohn C, Schott S. Women's Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e11458. [PMID: 30617040 PMCID: PMC6329419 DOI: 10.2196/11458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2018] [Revised: 09/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pregnancy can be distressing, particularly if expectant mothers are worried about the well-being of their fetus. Consequently, the desire for reassurance and frequent fetal monitoring is often pronounced. Smart wearable devices and telemedicine are promising tools that could assist women in self-monitoring their pregnancy at home, hence disburdening emergency departments (EDs). They present the possibility to clarify the need for urgent care remotely and offer tighter pregnancy monitoring. However, patients’ acceptance of such new technologies for fetal monitoring has not yet been explored extensively. Objective This survey aimed to elucidate the attitudes of women toward self-monitoring of their pregnancy using noninvasive electronic devices. The technical details of the proposed devices were not specified. Methods A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted at the departments of obstetrics of the University Hospitals of Heidelberg and Leipzig, Germany. All patients seen in the obstetrics clinic who were above 18 years were offered participation. We designed a survey questionnaire including validated instruments covering population characteristics, issues in current and past pregnancies, as well as attitudes toward self-monitoring of pregnancy with smart devices. Results A total of 509 pregnant women with no previous experience in telemedicine participated. Only a small minority of 5.9% (29/493) regarded self-monitoring with wearable devices as an alternative to consulting their physicians. Along these lines, only 7.7% (38/496) strongly believed they would visit the ED less often if such devices were readily available. However, if the procedure were combined with a Web-based telemetric physician consult, 13.5% (66/487) would be highly motivated to use the devices. Furthermore, significantly more women regarded it as an alternative prior to seeing a doctor when they perceived a decline in fetal movements (P<.001). Interestingly, women with university degrees had a higher propensity to engage in pregnancy self-monitoring compared with women without one (37% vs 23%; P=.001). Of the participants, 77.9% (381/489) would like smart wearable devices to measure fetal heart sounds, and 62.6% (306/489) wished to use the devices on their own. Feedback from a doctor or midwife was also very important in their choice of such devices (61.8%, 301/487 wished feedback). The intended frequency of use differed vastly among women, ranging from 13.8% (65/471) who would like to use such a device several times per day to 31.6% (149/471) who favored once per week at most. Conclusions Our results point to a skeptical attitude toward pregnancy self-monitoring among pregnant women. Nevertheless, many women are open to using devices for pregnancy monitoring in parallel to consulting their physician. The intention to use such devices several times daily or weekly, expressed by more than half of the participants, highlights the potential of such technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schramm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Women's Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Niklas Grassl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Women's Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Nees
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Women's Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Janine Hoffmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Women's Clinic Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Holger Stepan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Women's Clinic Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Haun
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Imad Maatouk
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Haist
- Frauenarztpraxis Markus Haist & Anja Ritthaler, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Timm C Schott
- Centre of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Orofacial Orthopedics, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Women's Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Women's Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Featherall J, Lapin B, Chaitoff A, Havele SA, Thompson N, Katzan I. Characterization of Patient Interest in Provider-Based Consumer Health Information Technology: Survey Study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e128. [PMID: 29674312 PMCID: PMC6004033 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Consumer health information technology can improve patient engagement in their health care and assist in navigating the complexities of health care delivery. However, the consumer health information technology offerings of health systems are often driven by provider rather than patient perspectives and inadequately address patient needs, thus limiting their adoption by patients. Consideration given to patients as stakeholders in the development of such technologies may improve adoption, efficacy, and consumer health information technology resource allocation. OBJECTIVE The aims of this paper were to measure patient interest in different health system consumer health information technology apps and determine the influence of patient characteristics on consumer health information technology interest. METHODS Patients seen at the Cleveland Clinic Neurological Institute were electronically surveyed on their interest in using different consumer health information technology apps. A self-efficacy scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 depression screen, and EuroQol 5 dimensions health-related quality of life scale were also completed by patients. Logistic regression was used to determine the influence of patient characteristics on interest in consumer health information technology in the categories of self-management, education, and communication. RESULTS The majority of 3852 patient respondents had an interest in all technology categories assessed in the survey. The highest interest was in apps that allow patients to ask questions of providers (3476/3852, 90.24%) and to schedule appointments (3211/3839, 83.64%). Patient interest in consumer health information technology was significantly associated with greater depression symptoms, worse quality of life, greater health self-efficacy, and smartphone ownership (P<.001 for all listed). CONCLUSIONS Patients should be viewed as active stakeholders in consumer health information technology development and their perspectives should consistently guide development efforts. Health systems should consider focusing on consumer health information technologies that assist patients in scheduling appointments and asking questions of providers. Patients with depression should also be considered for targeted consumer health information technology implementation. Health self-efficacy is a valid predictor of consumer health information technology interest and may play a role in the utilization of consumer health information technologies. Health systems, broadly, should put forth greater effort to understand the needs and interests of patients in the consumer health information technology development process. Consumer health information technology design and implementation may be improved by understanding which technologies patients want.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Featherall
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Brittany Lapin
- Neurological Institute Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Lerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Alexander Chaitoff
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Sonia A Havele
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Nicolas Thompson
- Neurological Institute Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Lerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Irene Katzan
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.,Neurological Institute Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Silva BSDA, Lira FS, Rossi FE, Ramos D, Uzeloto JS, Freire APCF, de Lima FF, Gobbo LA, Ramos EMC. Inflammatory and Metabolic Responses to Different Resistance Training on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Control Trial. Front Physiol 2018; 9:262. [PMID: 29628896 PMCID: PMC5877487 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Low-grade inflammation can be present in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which may affect the regulation of muscle protein and body metabolism. Regular exercise show improvement in muscle strength and dyspnea in patients with COPD, however, the response to training on inflammatory and metabolic disorders is unclear. In this study, we compared the effects of resistance training using weight machines and elastic resistance (bands and tubes) on the inflammatory and metabolic responses in patients with COPD. Methods: Patients with COPD were randomized into three groups: elastic band group (EBG), elastic tube group (ETG), and weight machines equipment group (MG). EBG and ETG were analyzed together [elastic group (EG)]. The participants were evaluated for pulmonary function (spirometry), peripheral muscle strength (digital dynamometry), IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-15 (Immunoassay), glucose, triacylglycerol, total cholesterol, HDL-c, and albumin levels (Enzymatic colorimetric). Blood samples were collected to assess the acute and chronic exercise responses after 12 weeks of training protocol. Results: The patient's mean age was 71.53 ± 6.97 years old. FEV1 (percent predicted) was 50.69 ± 16.67 and 45.40 ± 15.15% for EG and MG, respectively (p = 0.28). All groups increased muscle strength (p < 0.05) with no differences between groups. The acute response to exercise after 12 weeks of training showed improvement of inflammation when compared to baseline. Regarding the chronic effects, it was observed a decrease of all cytokines, except IL-10 (p < 0.05). After 12 weeks of training, the analysis of the metabolic profile presented a reduction in glucose concentration (p < 0.01), with no differences between groups (p = 0.30) and a decrease in triacylglycerol for the EG (p > 0.01). Conclusions: Training with elastic resistances or conventional weight machines showed improvement of inflammation response after 12 weeks of training. Chronically, both training groups showed anti-inflammatory effects, with the EG showing a strong tendency to improve IL-10/TNF-α ratio and IL-10 levels. Trial registration : RBR-6V9SJJ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruna S de Alencar Silva
- Skeletal Muscle Assessment Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| | - Fábio S Lira
- Exercise and Immunometabolism Research Group, Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| | - Fabrício E Rossi
- Immunometabolism of Skeletal Muscle and Exercise Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Piaui, Teresina, Brazil
| | - Dionei Ramos
- Department of Physical Therapy, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| | - Juliana S Uzeloto
- Department of Physical Therapy, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| | - Ana P C F Freire
- Department of Physical Therapy, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| | - Fabiano F de Lima
- Department of Physical Therapy, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| | - Luís A Gobbo
- Skeletal Muscle Assessment Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| | - Ercy M C Ramos
- Department of Physical Therapy, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|