1
|
Nishio-Lucar AG, Hunt HF, Booker SE, Cartwright LA, Larkin L, Gonzalez SA, Spiers JA, Srinivas T, Ahmad MU, Levan ML, Singh P, Wertin H, McAdams C, Lentine KL, Schaffer R. Utilizing Social Media to Identify Potential Living Donors: Learning from US Living Donor Programs. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022; 9:318-327. [PMID: 36466961 PMCID: PMC9684893 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00382-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Living donor transplantation provides the best possible recipient outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Yet, identifying potential living donors can be a laborious and resource intensive task that heavily relies on the recipient’s means and social network. Social media has evolved to become a key tool in helping to bring recipients and potential living donors together given its ease of utilization, widespread access, and improved recipient’s comfort with public solicitation. However, in the USA, formal guidelines to direct the use of social media in this context are lacking.
Recent Findings
To better inform the landscape and opportunities utilizing social media in living donation, the OPTN Living Donor Committee surveyed US transplant programs to explore programs’ experiences and challenges when helping patients use social media to identify potential living donors (September 2019). A large majority of survey participants (N = 125/174, 72%) indicated that their program provided education to use social media to identify potential living donors and most programs tracking referral source confirmed an increase utilization over time. The use of social media was compounded with program and recipient’s challenges including concerns about privacy, inadequate technology access, and knowledge gaps. In this review, we discuss the results of this national survey and recent literature, and provide suggestions to inform program practices and guidance provided to patients wishing to use social media to identify potential living donors.
Summary
Transplant programs should become competent in the use of social media for potential living donor identification to empower patients interested in using this tool. Social media education should be provided to all patients regardless of voiced interest and, when appropriate, revisited at multiple time points. Programs should consider developing a “team of experts” that can provide focused education and support to patients embarking in social media living donor campaigns. Care should be taken to avoid exacerbating disparities in access to living donor transplantation. Effective and timely guidance to patients in the use of social media could enhance the identification of potential living donors.
Collapse
|
2
|
Older Age is Associated With Lower Utilization of Living Donor Kidney Transplant. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 8:282-293. [PMID: 36815100 PMCID: PMC9939357 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Older adults (65 years or older) constitute a substantial and increasing proportion of patients with kidney failure, potentially needing kidney replacement therapy. Living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) offers superior outcomes for suitable patients of all ages. However, exploring LDKT and finding a living donor could be challenging for older adults. Here, we assessed the association between age and utilization of LDKT and assessed effect modification of key variables such as ethnicity and language. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with kidney failure referred for kidney transplant (KT) assessment in Toronto between January 2006 and December 2013. The association between age and having a potential living donor identified was assessed using logistic regression and the association between age and the receipt of LDKT was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of the 1617 participants, 50% were middle-aged (45-64 years old), and 17% were ≥65 years old. In our final multivariable adjusted models, compared to young adults, middle-aged and older adults had lower odds of having a potential living donor identified (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; confidence interval [CI], [0.35-0.63]; OR, 0.30; CI, [0.20-0.43]; P < 0.001, for middle-aged and older adults, respectively), and were less likely to receive LDKT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; CI, [0.63-0.99]; P = 0.04; HR, 0.47; CI, [0.30-0.72]; P = 0.001, for middle-aged and older adults, respectively.). Conclusion Age is an independent predictor of receiving LDKT. Considering that nearly 90% of patients with kidney failure in Canada are >45 years of age, these results point to important and potentially modifiable age-related barriers to LDKT.
Collapse
|
3
|
Estimating Patient Empowerment and Nurses' Use of Digital Strategies: eSurvey Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18189844. [PMID: 34574766 PMCID: PMC8472827 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18189844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Patient empowerment is seen as the capability to understand health information and make decisions based on it. It is a competence that can improve self-care, adherence and overall health. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the need for information and has also reduced the number of visits to health centers. Nurses have had to adapt in order to continue offering quality care in different environments such as the digital world, but this entails assessing the level of their patients’ empowerment and adapting material and educational messages to new realities. The aim of this study is, on the one hand, to assess nurses’ use of digital resources to provide reinforcing information to their patients and, on the other hand, to evaluate how they assess the level of empowerment of their patients. To perform the study, 850 nurses answered 21 questions related to their own digital literacy and patients’ empowerment. The ability to make decisions is the characteristic most selected by nurses (70%) as useful in measuring patient empowerment, whereas 9.19% do not measure it in any way. Printed material is most often used by nurses to offer additional information to patients (71.93%), mobile applications are the least used option (21.58%), and elder nurses are those who most recommend digital resources. In this study, younger nurses make little or no use of technology as a resource for training and monitoring patients. In spite of some limitations concerning the study, digital health needs to be promoted as an indisputable tool in the nurse’s briefcase in the future to ensure that older patients can manage electronic resources in different fields.
Collapse
|
4
|
DuBray BJ, Shawar SH, Rega SA, Smith KM, Centanni KM, Warmke K, Concepcion BP, Edwards GC, Schaefer HM, Feurer ID, Forbes RC. Impact of Social Media on Self-Referral Patterns for Living Kidney Donation. KIDNEY360 2020; 1:1419-1425. [PMID: 35372891 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0003212020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background As the organ-shortage crisis continues to worsen, many patients in need of a kidney transplant have turned to social media to find a living donor. The effect of social media on living kidney donation is not known. The goal of this study is to investigate the influence of social media on those interested in donating a kidney. Methods Self-referrals for living kidney donation from December 2016 to March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, sex, race, and relationship of individuals petitioned through social media (SM) were compared with those petitioned through verbal communication (VC). Data were analyzed using chi-squared tests, with z tests of column proportions, and multivariable logistic regression. Results A total of 7817 individuals (53% SM, 36% VC, and 10% other) were self-referred for living kidney donation. The analysis sample included 6737 adults petitioned through SM (n=3999) or VC (n=2738). Half (n=3933) of the individuals reported an altruistic relationship, and 94% of these respondents were petitioned through SM. Although univariate analyses indicated that SM respondents were younger, more likely female, more likely White, and more likely to have directed altruistic intent than those petitioned through VC (all P<0.05), multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that only decreased age, female sex, and relationship were significantly related to likelihood of SM use (all P<0.001). Conclusions The use of SM to petition living kidney donors is prevalent and accounts for a greater proportion of respondents compared with VC. SM respondents tend to be younger, female, and altruistic compared with VC. Directed altruistic interest in kidney donation is almost exclusively generated through SM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard J DuBray
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Saed H Shawar
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Scott A Rega
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Kara Warmke
- Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Beatrice P Concepcion
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Gretchen C Edwards
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Heidi M Schaefer
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Irene D Feurer
- Departments of Surgery and Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Transplant Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Rachel C Forbes
- Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Habbous S, Barnieh L, Klarenbach S, Manns B, Sarma S, Begen MA, Litchfield K, Lentine KL, Singh S, Garg AX. Evaluating multiple living kidney donor candidates simultaneously is more cost-effective than sequentially. Kidney Int 2020; 98:1578-1588. [DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
6
|
Waterman AD, Wood EH, Ranasinghe ON, Faye Lipsey A, Anderson C, Balliet W, Holland-Carter L, Maurer S, Aurora Posadas Salas M. A Digital Library for Increasing Awareness About Living Donor Kidney Transplants: Formative Study. JMIR Form Res 2020; 4:e17441. [PMID: 32480362 PMCID: PMC7404010 DOI: 10.2196/17441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It is not common for people to come across a living kidney donor, let alone consider whether they would ever donate a kidney themselves while they are alive. Narrative storytelling, the sharing of first-person narratives based on lived experience, may be an important way to improve education about living donor kidney transplants (LDKTs). Developing ways to easily standardize and disseminate diverse living donor stories using digital technology could inspire more people to consider becoming living donors and reduce the kidney shortage nationally. Objective This paper aimed to describe the development of the Living Donation Storytelling Project, a web-based digital library of living donation narratives from multiple audiences using video capture technology. Specifically, we aimed to describe the theoretical foundation and development of the library, a protocol to capture diverse storytellers, the characteristics and experiences of participating storytellers, and the frequency with which any ethical concerns about the content being shared emerged. Methods This study invited kidney transplant recipients who had received LDKTs, living donors, family members, and patients seeking LDKTs to record personal stories using video capture technology by answering a series of guided prompts on their computer or smartphone and answering questions about their filming experience. The digital software automatically spliced responses to open-ended prompts, creating a seamless story available for uploading to a web-based library and posting to social media. Each story was reviewed by a transplant professional for the disclosure of protected health information (PHI), pressuring others to donate, and medical inaccuracies. Disclosures were edited. Results This study recruited diverse storytellers through social media, support groups, churches, and transplant programs. Of the 137 storytellers who completed the postsurvey, 105/137 (76.6%) were white and 99/137 (72.2%) were female. They spent 62.5 min, on average, recording their story, with a final median story length of 10 min (00:46 seconds to 32:16 min). A total of 94.8% (130/137) of storytellers were motivated by a desire to educate the public; 78.1% (107/137) were motivated to help more people become living donors; and 75.9% (104/137) were motivated to dispel myths. The ease of using the technology and telling their story varied, with the fear of being on film, emotional difficulty talking about their experiences, and some technological barriers being reported. PHI, most commonly surnames and transplant center names, was present in 62.9% (85/135) of stories and was edited out. Conclusions With appropriate sensitivity to ensure diverse recruitment, ethical review of content, and support for storytellers, web-based storytelling platforms may be a cost-effective and convenient way to further engage patients and increase the curiosity of the public in learning more about the possibility of becoming living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy D Waterman
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Emily H Wood
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Omesh N Ranasinghe
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Crystal Anderson
- Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | | | - Stacey Maurer
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Is There Decreasing Public Interest in Renal Transplantation? A Google Trends TM Analysis. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9041048. [PMID: 32272783 PMCID: PMC7231300 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Renal transplantation is the preferred form of renal replacement therapy for the majority of patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). The Internet is a key tool for people seeking healthcare-related information. This current work explored the interest in kidney transplantation based on Internet search queries using Google TrendsTM. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS We performed a Google TrendsTM search with the search term "kidney transplantation" between 2004 (year of inception) and 2018. We retrieved and analyzed data on the worldwide trend as well as data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), the Organización Nacional de Trasplantes (ONT), the Eurotransplant area, and the National Health Service (NHS) Transplant Register. Google TrendsTM indices were investigated and compared to the numbers of performed kidney transplants, which were extracted from the respective official websites of UNOS, ONT, Eurotransplant, and the NHS. RESULTS During an investigational period of 15 years, there was a significant decrease of the worldwide Google TrendsTM index from 76.3 to 25.4, corresponding to an absolute reduction of -50.9% and a relative reduction by -66.7%. The trend was even more pronounced for the UNOS area (-75.2%), while in the same time period the number of transplanted kidneys in the UNOS area increased by 21.9%. Events of public interest had an impact on the search queries in the year of occurrence, as shown by an increase in the Google TrendsTM index by 39.2% in the year 2005 in Austria when a person of public interest received his second live donor kidney transplant. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates a decreased public interest in kidney transplantation. There is a clear need to raise public awareness, since transplantation represents the best form of renal replacement therapy for patients with ESRD. Information should be provided on social media, with a special focus on readability and equitable access, as well as on web pages.
Collapse
|
8
|
Henderson ML, Adler JT, Van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, Thomas AG, Herron PD, Waldram MM, Ruck JM, Purnell TS, DiBrito SR, Holscher CM, Haugen CE, Alimi Y, Konel JM, Eno AK, Garonzik Wang JM, Gordon EJ, Lentine KL, Schaffer RL, Cameron AM, Segev DL. How Should Social Media Be Used in Transplantation? A Survey of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Transplantation 2019; 103:573-580. [PMID: 29684002 PMCID: PMC6196114 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social media platforms are increasingly used in surgery and have shown promise as effective tools to promote deceased donation and expand living donor transplantation. There is a growing need to understand how social media-driven communication is perceived by providers in the field of transplantation. METHODS We surveyed 299 members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their use of, attitudes toward, and perceptions of social media and analyzed relationships between responses and participant characteristics. RESULTS Respondents used social media to communicate with: family and friends (76%), surgeons (59%), transplant professionals (57%), transplant recipients (21%), living donors (16%), and waitlisted candidates (15%). Most respondents (83%) reported using social media for at least 1 purpose. Although most (61%) supported sharing information with transplant recipients via social media, 42% believed it should not be used to facilitate living donor-recipient matching. Younger age (P = 0.02) and fewer years of experience in the field of transplantation (P = 0.03) were associated with stronger belief that social media can be influential in living organ donation. Respondents at transplant centers with higher reported use of social media had more favorable views about sharing information with transplant recipients (P < 0.01), increasing awareness about deceased organ donation (P < 0.01), and advertising for transplant centers (P < 0.01). Individual characteristics influence opinions about the role and clinical usefulness of social media. CONCLUSIONS Transplant center involvement and support for social media may influence clinician perceptions and practices. Increasing use of social media among transplant professionals may provide an opportunity to deliver high-quality information to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macey L. Henderson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD
| | - Joel T. Adler
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Alvin G. Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Madeleine M. Waldram
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jessica M. Ruck
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Tanjala S. Purnell
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sandra R. DiBrito
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Christine E. Haugen
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Yewande Alimi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jonathan M. Konel
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ann K. Eno
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Elisa J. Gordon
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Krista L. Lentine
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Andrew M. Cameron
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ruck JM, Henderson ML, Eno AK, Van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, DiBrito SR, Thomas AG, Li R, Singer L, Massie I, Waldram MM, Konel JM, Helfer DR, Garonzik Wang JM, Purnell TS, Mogul DB, Lentine KL, Waterman AD, Segev DL. Use of Twitter in communicating living solid organ donation information to the public: An exploratory study of living donors and transplant professionals. Clin Transplant 2018; 33:e13447. [PMID: 30421841 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As transplant centers start leveraging Twitter for information dissemination and public engagement, it is important to understand current living solid organ donation-related Twitter use. METHODS We identified public Twitter profiles available in 01/2017 that referenced living organ donation and analyzed the use of donation-related Twitter handles, names, or profile information. Tweets were manually abstracted and qualitatively analyzed for common themes. Social media influence of those tweeting about living donation was evaluated using Klout score. RESULTS We identified 93 donors, 61 professionals, 12 hospitals, and 19 organizations that met eligibility criteria. Social media influence was similar across these groups (P = 0.4). Donors (16%) and organizations (23%) were more likely than professionals (7%) or hospitals (0%) to include transplant-related educational information in their profiles (P = 0.007). Living donation-related tweets were most commonly donation stories (33%), news reports (20%), reports about new transplant research (15%), and sharing transplant candidates' searches for donors (14%). CONCLUSIONS This exploratory study of living donors and transplant professionals, hospitals, and organizations on Twitter provides insight into how the social media platform may be used to communicate about and disseminate information about living donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Ruck
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Macey L Henderson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ann K Eno
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Sandra R DiBrito
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alvin G Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rebecca Li
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lauren Singer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Indraneel Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Madeleine M Waldram
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jonathan M Konel
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David R Helfer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Tanjala S Purnell
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Douglas B Mogul
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Krista L Lentine
- Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Amy D Waterman
- Department of Nephrology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Acute and Chronic Care, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The Efficiency of Evaluating Candidates for Living Kidney Donation: A Scoping Review. Transplant Direct 2018; 4:e394. [PMID: 30498771 PMCID: PMC6233672 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000000833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental digital content is available in the text. Introduction The process of evaluating candidates for living kidney donation can be inefficient. A structured review of existing information on this topic can provide a necessary foundation for quality improvement. Methods We conducted a scoping review to map the published literature to different themes related to an efficient donor candidate evaluation. We reviewed the websites of living donor programs to describe information provided to candidates about the nature and length of the evaluation process. Results We reviewed of 273 published articles and 296 websites. Surveys of living donor programs show variability in donor evaluation protocols. Computed tomography (a routinely done test for all successful candidates) may be used to assess split renal volume instead of nuclear renography when the 2 kidneys differ in size. Depending on the candidate’s estimated glomerular filtration rate, a nuclear medicine scan for measured glomerular filtration rate may not be needed. When reported, the time to complete the evaluation varied from 3 months to over a year. The potential for undesirable outcomes was reported in 23 studies, including missed opportunities for living donation and/or preemptive transplants. According to living donor websites, programs generally evaluate 1 candidate at a time when multiple come forward for assessment, and few programs describe completing most of the evaluation in a single in-person visit. Conclusions Data on the efficiency of the living donor evaluation are limited. Future efforts can better define, collect, and report indicators of an efficient living donor evaluation to promote quality improvement and better patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
11
|
Parmar N, Dong L, Eisingerich AB. Connecting With Your Dentist on Facebook: Patients' and Dentists' Attitudes Towards Social Media Usage in Dentistry. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e10109. [PMID: 29959108 PMCID: PMC6045786 DOI: 10.2196/10109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social media has begun to proliferate across medical areas and transformed how medical professionals serve and interact with their patients. It offers a new communication avenue that has the potential to engage patients and, hence, may be used to create value for both medical professionals and patients. In dentistry, even though patients and dentists frequently use social media in their personal lives, little is known about their attitudes and expectations toward using social media for professional interactions. OBJECTIVE In this paper, we focus on the role of social media in dentistry. Specifically, we explore patients' and dentists' attitudes toward social media usage and their current online behaviors in this context. Furthermore, we examine potential challenges and opportunities regarding dentists' adoption of social media practices. METHODS This research employed a large-scale online survey of 588 patients and 532 dental professionals. We assessed the attitudes, expectations, and social media behaviors from both patients' and dentists' perspectives. RESULTS We found that more than 55% (290/532) of dentists in our sample have accounts for their dental practice on various social media platforms. Interestingly, while 73% (374/511) of patients did not expect their dental practice to have a social media presence, and 44% (207/468) thought that establishing a friendship with their dentists is not appropriate, the findings show that 36% (164/460) of patients had searched for their dentists, and 44% (207/470) of them were happy to establish contacts with dentists on social media. Furthermore, the findings highlight that patients were interested in exploring additional information such as online reviews and the qualifications of their dentists on Facebook pages. For dentists, more than half (375/432, 83%) of them in our sample thought that social media marketing is more efficient compared to traditional marketing. CONCLUSIONS Our findings revealed some key challenges and opportunities to utilize social media in dentistry. For both patients and dentists, the role of social media in dental services remains vague, and both parties still share concerns about connecting with each other on social media platforms. However, there also exists a sizeable number of patients who are already comfortable to connect with their dentists on social media sites such as Facebook. The current findings show that there is an opportunity for dental practices to trade upon a more active social media presence for enhanced patient interaction and engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lin Dong
- Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Henderson ML. Social Media in the Identification of Living Kidney Donors: Platforms, Tools, and Strategies. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2018; 5:19-26. [PMID: 29805956 PMCID: PMC5963285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Living donor transplantation offers patients with end-stage renal disease faster access to transplant and better survival and quality of life than waiting for a deceased donor or remaining on dialysis. While many people state they would be willing to help someone in need through kidney donation, there are education and communication barriers to donor candidate identification. These barriers might be mitigated by technological innovations, including the use of social media. RECENT FINDINGS This article describes the state of contemporary evidence regarding use of social media tools and interventions to increase access to living donor transplantation, as reported in peer-reviewed medical literature, as well as programs that have not yet been formally evaluated. SUMMARY As social media platforms continue to grow and expand, a commitment to understanding and facilitating the use of social media by the transplant community may support patients who are interested in using social media as a tool to find a living kidney donor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macey L. Henderson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Social Media in the Identification of Living Kidney Donors: Platforms, Tools, and Strategies. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-018-0179-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Henderson ML, Clayville KA, Fisher JS, Kuntz KK, Mysel H, Purnell TS, Schaffer RL, Sherman LA, Willock EP, Gordon EJ. Social media and organ donation: Ethically navigating the next frontier. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:2803-2809. [PMID: 28744966 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Revised: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
As the organ shortage continues to grow, the creation of social media communities by transplant hospitals and the public is rapidly expanding to increase the number of living donors. Social media communities are arranged in myriad ways and without standardization, raising concerns about transplant candidates' and potential donors' autonomy and quality of care. Social media communities magnify and modify extant ethical issues in deceased and living donation related to privacy, confidentiality, professionalism, and informed consent, and increase the potential for undue influence and coercion for potential donors and transplant candidates. Currently, no national ethical guidelines have been developed in the United States regarding the use of social media to foster organ transplantation. We provide an ethical framework to guide transplant stakeholders in using social media for public and patient communication about transplantation and living donation, and offer recommendations for transplant clinical practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Henderson
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - J S Fisher
- Scripps Clinic/Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - K K Kuntz
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - H Mysel
- The Living Kidney Donors Network, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - T S Purnell
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - R L Schaffer
- Scripps Clinic/Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - L A Sherman
- Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - E P Willock
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - E J Gordon
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Social media use has increased both in the general public and in the surgical profession. A variety of social media platforms have been used, with Twitter being one of the most common and interactive platforms. Common uses by surgeons and scientists for social media include dissemination of information, information exchange, education, research recruitment, community consultation for clinical trials, and hospital or surgeon ratings. As social media use increases, a new language as well as metrics has been developed to track impact and reach of research incorporating social media platforms. All surgeons should be encouraged to familiarize themselves with social media, regardless of whether or not they choose to actively engage in it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalya M Ferguson
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Lillian S Kao
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|