Percutaneous abscess drainage in patients with perforated acute appendicitis: effectiveness, safety, and prediction of outcome

Impact of an Acute Care Surgery Clinical Pathway on Patient Outcomes in Acute Appendicitis

Objectives: Acute care surgery (ACS) encompasses surgical critical care, emergency general surgery, and the surgical management of trauma. Following ACS implementation at our institution, we developed a perioperative clinical pathway for acute appendicitis (AA) to improve efficiency and standardize post-operative care. The purpose of our study is to assess patient outcomes utilizing our ACS clinical pathway for patients with AA. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study involving patients admitted to our tertiary care facility with AA who underwent appendectomy. Patients were classified by pre-implementation (January 1, 2016-July 31, 2018) and post-implementation (August 1, 2018-December 31, 2020) of our ACS clinical pathway. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS with a p-value <0.05 determined as significant. Results: Of the 492 patients included, 225 were in the pre- and 267 were in the post-implementation cohorts. Hospital LOS was substantially decreased in the post-implementation cohort (31.2 vs. 50.4 h, p < 0.001). The post-implementation group had a substantial decrease in computed tomography (CT) to operating room (OR) start time (6.81 vs. 11.4 h, p < 0.001), CT to antibiotic agents' administration (2.20 vs. 3.37 h, p < 0.001), inpatient opioid utilization (125 morphine equivalents [ME] vs. 172 ME, p < 0.001), and discharge antibiotic agents' prescription rates (23.6% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.077). Recovery unit discharges (20 vs. 9%, p < 0.001) were increased in the post-implementation cohort. Conclusion: Our ACS clinical pathway for AA resulted in earlier surgical intervention, enhanced opioid and antimicrobial stewardship, and gains in surgical care efficiencies.

Clinical significance of appendicoliths in conservative treatment of acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess: a single-center retrospective study

Background

This study aimed to analyze the clinical data of patients who received conservative treatment for acute complicated appendicitis with peri-appendiceal abscess, identify factors influencing the success rate, and improve treatment strategies.

Methods

The clinical data of acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess who received conservative treatment at the Department of Emergency Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, from January 2016 to March 2023, were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

A total of 80 patients were included in our study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the outcomes of ultrasound-guided drainage: The Drainage group (n=28) and the Antibiotic group (n=52). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. In the Antibiotic group, the surgery rate was 30.4% for patients with an appendicolith and 6.9% for those without. In the Drainage group, the surgery rate was 33.3% for patients with an appendicolith and 27.3% for those without. The presence of an appendicolith significantly correlated with the need for surgery in the Antibiotic group (P=0.026), but not in the Drainage group (P=0.771). For patients who underwent surgery, the incidence of surgical site infections did not differ significantly (P=0.656), and the median length of postoperative hospital stay was similar between the groups (4.0 days vs. 3.0 days, P=0.337).

Conclusion

The presence of an appendicolith is a risk factor for the failure of antibiotic therapy alone in acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess. However, it does not affect the surgical rate in those who underwent successful drainage.

Clinical significance of peri-appendiceal abscess and phlegmon in acute complicated appendicitis patients undergoing emergency appendectomy

BACKGROUND

Although antibiotic therapy has become the primary treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis, the management of acute complicated appendicitis necessitates careful consideration of various treatment options.

AIM

To analyze the clinical data of patients who underwent emergency appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis with peri-appendiceal abscess or phlegmon, identify factors influencing the postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS), and improve treatment strategies.

METHODS

The clinical data of acute complicated appendicitis patients with peri-appendiceal abscess or phlegmon who underwent emergency appendectomy at The Department of Emergency Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2016 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were included in our study. The duration of symptoms and the presence of an appendicolith were significantly correlated with the occurrence of peri-appendiceal abscess in patients with acute complicated appendicitis (P < 0.001 and P = 0.015, respectively). Patients with symptoms lasting longer than 72 h had a significantly longer postoperative LOS compared to those with symptoms lasting 72 h or less [hazard ratio (HR), 1.208; 95%CI: 1.107-1.319; P < 0.001]. Additionally, patients with peri-appendiceal abscesses had a significantly longer postoperative LOS compared to those with phlegmon (HR, 1.217; 95%CI: 1.095-1.352; P < 0.001). The patients with peri-appendiceal abscesses were divided into two groups based on the median size of the abscess: Those with abscesses smaller than 5.0 cm (n = 69) and those with abscesses 5.0 cm or larger (n = 82). Patients with peri-appendiceal abscesses measuring 5.0 cm or larger had a significantly longer postoperative LOS than those with abscesses smaller than 5.0 cm (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

The duration of symptoms and the presence of an appendicolith are significant risk factors for the formation of peri-appendiceal abscesses in patients with acute complicated appendicitis. Patients with peri-appendiceal abscesses experience a significantly longer postoperative LOS compared to those with peri-appendiceal phlegmon.

Safety and Feasibility of Photodynamic Therapy for Percutaneous Image-guided Abdominopelvic Abscess Drainage: Phase 1 Trial

Background Standard-of-care abscess management includes image-guided percutaneous drainage and antibiotics; however, cure rates vary, and concern for antibiotic-resistant bacteria is growing. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), which uses light-activated dyes to generate cytotoxic reactive oxygen species, could complement the standard of care by sterilizing the abscess at the time of drainage. Purpose To evaluate safety and feasibility of PDT with methylene blue (hereafter, MB-PDT) at the time of percutaneous abscess drainage. Materials and Methods This prospective, open-label, dose-escalation, first-in-humans, registered phase 1 clinical study of MB-PDT included participants who underwent percutaneous abdominal or pelvic abscess drainage with CT or US guidance from January 2015 to March 2020 and September 2022 to September 2023. Following drainage, MB-PDT was performed with laser illumination at a fluence rate of 20 mW/cm2, with fluence groups of 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 J/cm2 (n = 3 each). The primary outcome was safety, indicated by absence of fat embolism, MB escape, abscess wall damage, and need for surgery to remove optical fibers. Preliminary efficacy end points included the time to drainage catheter removal, drainage catheter output volume, and clinical symptom and fever duration. Relationships between fluence and outcomes were analyzed with Spearman correlation and linear regression analyses, and ordinary one-way analysis of variance was used for group comparisons. Results MB-PDT was safe and feasible in all 18 participants (mean age, 60.1 years ± 18.3 [SD]; 10 female), with no negative safety outcomes observed for any participant. No study-related adverse events were encountered, and the procedure did not increase reported pain (P = .1). Clinical symptom and fever duration was shorter in participants receiving higher fluences (30 and 36 J/cm2 vs 6 J/cm2) (P = .03). The presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria was not predictive of clinical symptom and fever duration (β = 0.13, P = .37). Conclusion MB-PDT was a safe and feasible adjunct to image-guided percutaneous abscess drainage. Clinical measures indicated a dose-dependent response to PDT. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT02240498 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Johnston and Goldberg in this issue.

Photodynamic therapy is a safe and feasible adjunct to percutaneous drainage of deep tissue abscesses: Results of a first in humans Phase 1 clinical trial

Background

Standard of care for abscess management includes image-guided percutaneous drainage and antibiotics. However, cure rates vary between patients and there is growing concern for antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), which utilizes light-activated dyes to generate cytotoxic reactive species, could complement the standard of care by sterilizing the abscess at time of drainage.

Purpose

The goal of this study was to perform a first in humans Phase 1 clinical study evaluating safety and feasibility of PDT with methylene blue (MB) at the time of percutaneous abscess drainage. This was accomplished through an open-label dose escalation study, with duration of light delivery escalated from 5-30 minutes.

Materials and Methods

We performed MB-PDT in 18 subjects undergoing percutaneous abscess drainage. Following standard of care drainage, 1 mg/mL MB was delivered for 10 minutes. MB was aspirated, and 1% lipid emulsion infused to homogenize light dose at the cavity wall. An optical fiber was advanced to the approximate center of the abscess for 665 nm laser illumination at 20 mW/cm 2 .

Results

MB-PDT at the time of abscess drainage was safe and feasible in all cases, with no evidence of fat embolism due to lipid emulsion or adverse reaction to MB observed. No study-related adverse or serious adverse events were encountered, and the procedure was well tolerated by all subjects. While the study was not designed or powered to determine efficacy, time to resolution of clinical symptoms was significantly decreased in subjects receiving higher fluences (p=0.028). Additionally, drainage catheter output post-procedure was decreased in subjects receiving higher fluences (ρ=-0.18), although this difference was not significant (p=0.43).

Conclusion

MB-PDT is a safe and feasible adjunct to image-guided percutaneous abscess drainage. Clinical measures indicate a dose-dependent response to PDT, motivating future Phase 2 studies evaluating the efficacy of MB-PDT in this patient population.

Comparison Between Early Appendectomy vs. Conservative Management in Cases of Appendicular Mass

INTRODUCTION

At present, the treatment of choice for appendicular masses is unclear. Recent studies claimed that conservative management of appendicular masses was safe in terms of frequency of perforation. However, there is controversy in the existing literature.

OBJECTIVE

This research is designed to compare the results of early appendectomy versus conservative management of appendicular masses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It was a randomized controlled trial performed in the Combined Military Hospital, Lahore. The study lasted six months, from 01/03/2019 to 30/09/2019. It involved 60 patients of both genders aged between 16 and 70 years diagnosed with appendicular masses with an Alvarado score of 4-7. These patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups. In Group A patients, an early appendectomy was performed, while patients in Group B were managed conservatively. Outcome variables were the mean length of hospital stay and frequency of appendicular perforation.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 26.8±11.9 years. There were 33 (55.0%) male and 27 (45.0%) female patients, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.2:1. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients managed conservatively as compared to those undergoing early appendectomy (2.80±1.54 vs. 1.83±0.83; p=0.004). However, the frequency of perforation was not significantly higher in the conservative group as compared to the early appendectomy group (16.7% vs. 10.0%; p=0.448).

CONCLUSION

Conservative management of patients with appendicular mass was associated with prolonged hospital stays, yet it was found equally safe in terms of frequency of appendicular perforation, which advocates conservative management of patients with appendicular mass, particularly in high-risk patients.

The Application of Dual-Pathway Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Treatment of Periappendiceal Abscesses

OBJECTIVES

To explore the value of an ultrasound contrast agent (Sonovue) as an interventional treatment for periappendiceal abscesses.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2020, 30 patients were recruited who were admitted to Jinan Central Hospital due to periappendiceal abscesses. Before the operation, 2.5 ml of SonoVue® contrast agent was injected intravenously to determine the non-enhanced area of liquefaction and necrosis in the abscess cavity. The puncture sites were selected. Percutaneous catheterization and drainage (PCD) were performed under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance. After the operation, 1 ml of diluted SonoVue® suspension was injected through the drainage tube to observe the position of the drainage tube, the degree of drainage and the development of the abscess.

RESULTS

An ultrasound contrast agent was used preoperatively to assess the extent of the abscess. Liquefaction and necrosis were observed in the abscess cavity. CEUS showed hyperenhancement in the wall of the abscess in the arterial phase and the liquefied necrotic area in the abscess cavity was not enhanced before PCD. CEUS allowed operators to confidently identify the puncture site. Amongst the 30 cases of PCD, 27 cases showed the clear positioning of the drainage tube. The head of the drainage tube was placed in the ideal position and development could be seen in the abscess cavity. The diffusion effect of the contrast agent was good with no spillover and the drainage was unobstructed. Abscess development was observed in 3 patients after puncture injection of the contrast agent but the head of the drainage tube was not in the predetermined position. After adjusting the position of the drainage tube, CEUS was repeated and showed a strong diffusion effect of the contrast agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous injection of Sonovue before PCD of periappendiceal abscesses can evaluate the extent of the abscess, liquefaction and necrosis in the abscess cavity. The approach can also provide guidance for the placement of the drainage tube. After the operation, a diluted contrast agent was injected through the drainage tube. The position of the drainage tube and the flow direction of the contrast agent could be seen. This approach has good value for clinical applications to accurately judge the position of the drainage tube.

Laparoscopic Drainage Versus Interventional Radiology for Management Of Appendicular Abscess : A Randomized Controlled Trial.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1975645/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Background: Laparoscopic drainage of appendicular abscess has become a novel technique due to its advantages over interventional radiology like complete exploration of the abdomen, exclusion of other pathologies, excision of the appendix at same session, better cosmesis, decrease incidence of wound infection & incisional hernia, better visualization of surgical field, fine handling of edematous tissue and drainage of multiple collections. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included all patients who developed the manifestations of appendicular abscess and referred to the Zagazig University Hospital Emergency Department between January 2020 and February 2022. The study was prospectively approved by Zagazig University Faculty of Medicine Institutional Review Board (Approval Number: 55342/24.1.2020), and was retrospectively submitted in clinicaltrials.gov in 15/6/2022 (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05419440). The sample size was 172 patients divided into two equal group, laparoscopic group involved 86 patients (group1), interventional radiology group involved 86 patients (group2). Results: “Group 1 (laparoscopic drainage group) included 86 patients: 55.8% were males, with a mean age of 41.2 (± 12.2) years-old, while in group 2 (interventional radiology group) included 86 patients: 51.2% were males, with a mean age of 36.8 (± 10.9) years-old. The reported complications were bowel injury, fecal fistula, recurrence, pelvic collection and mortality with incidence rates of occurrence 1(1.2%), 3 (3.5%), 0 (0%), 0 (0%), 0(0%) respectively in group (1) while in group(2) were 5(5.8%), 0(0%), 3(3.5%), 8(9.3%), 1(1.2%) respectively. Regarding quality of life in both groups were excellent, good, poor with incidence rates of 48(55.8%), 38(44.2%), 0(0%) respectively in group (1), and 12(14%), 59(68.6%), 15(17.4%) respectively in group(2). Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of appendicular abscess can be safely applied in a good experienced hand with no mortality & morbidity, without the need for interval appendectomy.

Clostridioides difficile infection after appendectomy: An analysis of short-term outcomes from the NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection can be a significant complication in surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and impact on outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection in adult patients after appendectomy.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set was used to identify all patients with the primary procedure code of appendectomy between 2016 and 2018. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were extracted from the database, and descriptive statistics were performed. A multivariate logistic regression was created to identify predictors of Clostridioides difficile infection following appendectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 135,272 patients who underwent appendectomy were identified, and of those, 469(0.35%) developed Clostridioides difficile infection. Patients with Clostridioides difficile infection were more likely to be older (51.23 vs 40.47 years; P < .0001), female (P = .004), American Society of Anesthesiology score >2 (P < .0001), present with septic shock (P < .0001), or lack functional independence (P < .0001). Patients with Clostridioides difficile infection were more likely to have increased operative time (62.9 vs 50.4 minutes; P < .0001), have perforated appendicitis (48.9% vs 23.5%; P < .0001), and underwent open surgery (7.0% vs 4.0%; P = .0006). Postoperatively, patients with Clostridioides difficile infection required a longer length of stay (4.8 vs 1.8 days; P < .0001), had increased mortality (2.1% vs 0.1%; P < .0001), higher incidences of postoperative abscess (14.9% vs 2.9%; P < .0001), postoperative sepsis (15.1% vs 4.0%; P < .0001), and readmission (30.7% vs 3.4%; all P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, older age (P < .0001), female sex (P = .0043), septic shock (P = .0002), open surgery (P = .037), and dirty wound class (P = .0147) were all independently predictive factors of Clostridioides difficile infection after appendectomy.

CONCLUSION

Clostridioides difficile infection is an uncommon postoperative complication of appendectomy and is associated with worse outcomes and higher mortality. Older patients, female sex, those with sepsis, and those undergoing open surgery are at higher risk for developing Clostridioides difficile infection.

The treatment of acute appendicitis in two age-based groups during COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective experience in a COVID-19 referral hospital

PURPOSE

During the past months, the Italian Government has reduced the restrictions and access to hospitals as well as outpatient. Since then, up to 40% of non-traumatic abdominal emergencies have had unusual delayed treatment. Given the rapidly evolving situation and the absence of evidence to support recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is useful to assess how the current situation is influencing the management of elderly patients with acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Between February 2020 and December 2020, all patients 18 years or older undergone appendectomy were included. Patients were divided in two age-based groups (young groups, YG; elderly group, EG). Surgical approach, hospital stay, post-operative complications, radiology reports, and histologic examination were included in the retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred eight patients underwent appendectomy, 81 patients into the YG, and 27 in the EG. Laparoscopy was performed in 87.7% of the YG and in 51.8% of the elderly (p < 0.000), while conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 3.7% in the YG vs 22.3% of the other group (p < 0.009). Open procedures were more frequent in the EG, 25.9% vs 8.6% (p value < 0.05). No mortality rate was reported in both groups; moreover, the mean hospital stay was greater in the EG than the YG (p < 0.000).

CONCLUSION

Our data highlighted a partial delay in diagnosis in the elderly group, and an increase in complicated appendicitis also demonstrated by the need for conversion to laparotomy despite no significant relationship between these findings and the histologic examination was reported.

From the Base of the Cecum to the Throne of England: King Edward VII’s Appendix

This historical retrospective explores the case of King Edward VII’s appendicitis at the time of his planned coronation in 1902, as well as the contributions of the king’s surgeons Frederick Treves and Joseph Lister, towards his medical care. The history of appendicitis, as well as a view of the king’s medical management in the lens of modern surgical and sociopolitical contexts, is also examined.

Presentation and outcomes of acute appendicitis during COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned from the Middle East-a multicentre prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a striking impact on healthcare services in the world. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation management and outcomes of acute appendicitis (AA) in different centers in the Middle East.

METHODS

This multicenter cohort study compared the presentation and outcomes of patients with AA who presented during the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to patients who presented before the onset of the pandemic. Demographic data, clinical presentation, management strategy, and outcomes were prospectively collected and compared.

RESULTS

Seven hundred seventy-one patients presented with AA during the COVID pandemic versus 1174 in the pre-COVID period. Delayed and complex presentation of AA was significantly more observed during the pandemic period. Seventy-six percent of patients underwent CT scanning to confirm the diagnosis of AA during the pandemic period, compared to 62.7% in the pre-COVID period. Non-operative management (NOM) was more frequently employed in the pandemic period. Postoperative complications were higher amid the pandemic as compared to before its onset. Reoperation and readmission rates were significantly higher in the COVID period, whereas the negative appendicectomy rate was significantly lower in the pandemic period (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a remarkable decrease in the number of patients with AA was seen along with a higher incidence of complex AA, greater use of CT scanning, and more application of NOM. The rates of postoperative complications, reoperation, and readmission were significantly higher during the COVID period.

Acute appendicitis–advances and controversies

Being one of the most common causes of the acute abdomen, acute appendicitis (AA) forms the bread and butter of any general surgeon’s practice. With the recent advancements in AA’s management, much controversy in diagnostic algorithms, possible differential diagnoses, and weighing the management options has been generated, with no absolute consensus in the literature. Since Alvarado described his eponymous clinical scoring system in 1986 to stratify AA risk, there has been a burgeoning of additional scores for guiding downstream management and mortality assessment. Furthermore, advancing literature on the role of antibiotics, variations in appendicectomy, and its adjuncts have expanded the surgeon’s repertoire of management options. Owing to the varied presentation, diagnostic tools, and management of AA have also been proposed in special groups such as pregnant patients, the elderly, and the immunocompromised. This article seeks to raise the critical debates about what is currently known about the above aspects of AA and explore the latest controversies in the field. Considering the ever-evolving coronavirus disease 2019 situation worldwide, we also discuss the pandemic’s repercussions on patients and how surgeons’ practices have evolved in the context of AA.

Imaging of acute pelvic pain

Acute pelvic pain (APP) requires urgent medical evaluation and treatment. Differential diagnosis of APP is broad, including a variety of gynecologic and non-gynecologic/ urinary, gastrointestinal, vascular and other entities. Close anatomical and physiological relations of pelvic structures, together with similar clinical presentation of different disorders and overlapping of symptoms, especially in the emergency background, make the proper diagnosis of APP challenging. Imaging plays a crucial role in the fast and precise diagnosis of APP. Ultrasonography is the first-line imaging modality, often accompanied by CT, while MRI is utilized in specific cases, using short, tailored protocols. Recognizing the cause of APP in females is a challenging task, due to the wide spectrum of possible origin and overlap of their imaging features. Therefore, the radiologist has to be familiar with the possible causes of APP, and, relying on clinical presentation, together with laboratory findings, choose the best imaging strategy in order to establish a fast and accurate diagnosis.

The feasibility of interval laparoscopic appendectomy and appropriate patient selection: A retrospective study of adult appendiceal masses

INTRODUCTION

We examined the safety and effectiveness of interval laparoscopic appendectomy (ILA) for adult appendiceal mass (AAM) and then used a novel white blood cell (WBC) parameter to identify the types of AAM cases for which nonsurgical treatment followed by ILA is effective.

METHODS

We reviewed the cases of 956 patients who had undergone appendectomy between April 2012 and March 2018 at our facility. Of these patients, 49 had AAM, including 34 who underwent ILA. We examined the safety and effectiveness of ILA by comparing it with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA); specifically, the 34 cases treated with ILA were compared with 477 cases of adult uncomplicated appendicitis treated with LA from the same patient cohort. We then examined the factors associated with not successfully completing the planned nonsurgical treatment and interval before ILA. Patient demographics and clinical variables were reviewed.

RESULTS

Patients who had undergone ILA had longer operative times than those who had undergone LA (P = .0059), but they also had shorter postoperative hospital stays (P < .001). There were no significant differences in other perioperative variables. Multivariate analysis showed that a ratio of WBC count on day 3 and day 0 from the start of nonsurgical treatment (WBC day3/day0) of 0.906 or higher was significantly associated with not completing the nonsurgical treatment and interval before ILA (P = .045).

CONCLUSION

A comparison of the procedures found that ILA for AAM was almost as safe and effective as LA for adult uncomplicated appendicitis. The WBC day3/day0 ratio can be an objective parameter to assess the effectiveness of the nonsurgical treatment before ILA earlier in the course of treatment.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on appendicitis treatment in Germany-a population-based analysis

PURPOSE

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common reasons for emergency medical consultation. While simple appendicitis can be treated with antibiotics or surgery, complex appendicitis including gangrene, abscess, and perforation requires appendectomy. During the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, an overall drop in emergency room consultations was observed. We therefore aimed to investigate the incidence and treatment strategies of acute appendicitis during that period.

METHODS

Data of insurance holders with the ICD code for "acute appendicitis" or OPS procedure of appendectomy of a major health insurance company in Germany were analyzed retrospectively. Groups were built, containing of the means of March-June of 2017, 2018, and 2019, defined as "pre-COVID group" with the "COVID group," defined as data from March to June of 2020. Data was analyzed by age, sex, comorbidities, length of hospital stay, diagnoses, and treatment. Data of the COVID group was analyzed for simultaneous COVID-19 infection.

RESULTS

During the COVID-19 pandemic of early 2020, an overall reduction by 12.9% of patients presenting with acute appendicitis was noticeable. These results were mainly due to decreased rates of uncomplicated appendicitis, while complicated appendicitis was scarcely affected. Especially in the group of females < 40 years, a drastic reduction was visible. Rates of extended surgery did not change. Likewise, the complication rate like appendix stump leakage or need for re-operation did not differ. In March 2020, 4.8% of acute appendicitis patients had concomitant COVID-19 infection.

CONCLUSION

In line with the overall drop of emergency room visits during the COVID-19 pandemic of spring 2020 in Germany, a significantly lowered number of patients with uncomplicated appendicitis were noticeable, whereas complicated appendicitis did not differ. Also, treatment and complication rate of acute appendicitis did not change. These findings might be a hint that acute appendicitis is not a progressing disease but caused by different entities for uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis and therefore another clue that uncomplicated appendicitis can be treated with antibiotics or observation. Nevertheless provided data does not cover outpatient treatment; therefore, no statement observation or antibiotics in outpatients can be made.

[Acute abdomen : What the clinician wants to know from the radiologist]

CLINICAL ISSUE

Acute abdominal pain is a prevalent problem in the emergency department. The work-up has to include a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses, which should be narrowed down with respect to frequent diagnoses without overlooking rare but potentially even more severe pathologies.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

The radiological method of choice for the initial work-up after sonography is computed tomography, which has demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity for most findings. Plain film radiographs of the abdomen rarely contribute to the final diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging is reserved for selected cases, which are described in this article.

ASSESSMENT

The clinical decision trees and recommendations, which need to be in the report depending on the diagnosis, are of relevance for every radiologist who deals with patients with acute abdominal presentations.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Knowledge of the clinical diagnostic approach in patients with acute abdomen is an unavoidable prerequisite for optimal cooperation between clinicians and radiologists in acute situations.

Beyond just the operating room: characterizing the complete caseload of a tertiary acute care surgery service

BACKGROUND

Most studies evaluating acute care surgery (ACS) models of care for patients with emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions have focused on patients who undergo surgery while admitted under the care of the ACS service. The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the case-mix of admissions and consultations to an ACS service at a tertiary centre to identify the frequency and distribution of both operatively and nonoperatively managed EGS conditions.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated consecutive patients assessed by the ACS team between July 1 and Aug. 31, 2015, at a large Canadian tertiary care centre. This included all consultations and outside hospital transfers. Diagnoses, demographic characteristics, comorbidities, intervention(s), complications, readmission and in-hospital death were captured.

RESULTS

The ACS team was involved in the care of 359 patients, 176 (49.0%) of whom were admitted under the direct care of the ACS team. Nonoperative care was indicated in 82 patients (46.6%) admitted to the ACS service and 151 (82.5%) of those admitted to a non-ACS service (p < 0.001). Bowel obstruction (37 patients [21.0%]) was the most common reason for admission, followed by wound/abscess (24 [13.6%), biliary disease (24 [13.6%]) and appendiceal disease (23 [13.1%]). Rates of 30-day return to the emergency department and readmission were 17.0% and 9.1%, respectively, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.7%.

CONCLUSION

Acute care surgery teams care for a wide breadth of disease, a considerable amount of which is managed nonoperatively.

Drain Failure in Intra-Abdominal Abscesses Associated with Appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have suggested that percutaneous drainage and interval appendectomy is an effective treatment for appendicitis with associated abscess. Few studies to date have analyzed risk factors for failed drain management. We hypothesized that older patients with more co-morbidities would be at higher risk for failing conservative treatment.

METHODS

The 2010-2014 editions of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) were queried for patients with diagnoses of peri-appendiceal abscesses. Minors and elective admissions were excluded. We identified patients who underwent percutaneous drainage and defined drain failure as undergoing a surgical operation after drainage but during the same inpatient visit to assess for factors associated with failure of drainage alone as a treatment. After univariable analysis, binomial logistic regression was used to assess for independent risk factors. Frequencies were analyzed by χ² and continuous variables by Student's t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 2,209 patients with appendiceal abscesses received drains; 561 patients (25.4%) failed conservative management and underwent operative intervention. On univariable analysis, patients who failed conservative management were younger, more likely to be Hispanic, have more inpatient diagnoses, and to have undergone drainage earlier in the hospital course. Multivariable regression demonstrated that the number of diagnoses, female sex, and Hispanic race were predictive of failure of drainage alone. Older age, West and Midwest census regions, and later drain placement were predictive of successful treatment with drainage alone. Failure was associated with more charges and longer hospital stay but not with a higher mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Approximately a quarter of patients will fail management of appendiceal abscess with percutaneous drain placement alone. Risk factors for failure are patient complexity, female sex, earlier drainage, and Hispanic race. Failure of drainage is associated with higher total charges and longer hospital stay; however, no change in the mortality rate was noted.

Appendicitis in Cancer Patients is often Observed and Can Represent Appendiceal Malignancy

Appendectomy is standard of care for uncomplicated appendicitis, but cancer patients may not be optimal surgical candidates. Interval appendectomy is controversial, and appendiceal malignancy is rare. Study objectives were to review the role of surgery, observation, and interventional radiology (IR)-guided drainage in patients with appendicitis and advanced malignancy. Retrospective review was performed on cancer patients presenting to a tertiary academic cancer center from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2014. Patients diagnosed with appendicitis were assigned to observation, surgery, and IR drainage after surgical evaluation. Success rates of initial treatment strategies were calculated. Rates of interval appendectomies and pathology were reviewed. Of 72 consults, 32 patients were included. Median age was 53 years, 50 per cent (16/32) were male, 50 per cent (16/32) had chemotherapy less than six weeks to presentation, and 63 per cent (20/32) had advanced stage malignancy. Of the 62.5 per cent (20/32) observed, 25 per cent (8/32) received immediate surgery, 12.5 per cent (4/32) required IR drainage, and 69 per cent (22/32) of patients were initially managed without surgery. Interval appendectomy rate was 19 per cent (6/32). Pathology confirmed appendiceal malignancies in 9.3 per cent (3/32). Cancer patients with acute appendicitis are frequently observed. High incidence of appendiceal malignancy may be due to the older median age. Interval appendectomy should be considered in this population.

Efficacy of fibrin glue therapy for abscess-associated enteric fistulas

BACKGROUND

Abdominal abscess that result from bowel injury may require treatment with percutaneous drainage. In some cases, an abscess-associated fistula develops between the injured bowel and the drainage catheter. Fistulas that fail to resolve may require surgery; however, fibrin glue therapy (FGT) may be a suitable alternative.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients undergoing FGT for an abscess-associated enteric fistula between 2004 and 2015. Success was defined as closure of the fistula tract without need for additional intervention. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify factors associated with success.

RESULTS

We identified 34 patients with a median age of 54 (23-87) years and 24 (71 %) males. FGT was successful in 23 (67 %) patients. On multivariate analysis, a tract width less than 5 mm (OR 19.2, 95 % CI 1.7-214.5) and removal of the drain (OR 13.8, 95 % CI 1.2-157.6) predicted FGT success. The time from initial FGT to resolution was significantly decreased for the patients who were successfully treated compared to those who failed 24 (14-38) days vs. 99 (71-175) days, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrin glue therapy for abscess-associated enteric fistula results in successful and accelerated healing in the majority of cases. Factors associated with successful fibrin glue therapy were identified.

Role of non-operative management in pediatric appendicitis

Appendectomy is currently considered the standard of care for children with acute appendicitis. Although commonly performed and considered a safe procedure, appendectomy is not without complications. Non-operative management has a role in the treatment of both uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. In uncomplicated appendicitis, initial non-operative management appears to be safe, with an approximate 1-year success rate of 75%. Compared to surgery, non-operative management is associated with less disability and lower costs, with no increase in the rate of complicated appendicitis. In patients with complicated appendicitis, initial non-operative management with interval appendectomy has been shown to be safe with reported success rates between 66% and 95%. Several studies suggest that initial non-operative management with interval appendectomy may be beneficial in patients with perforated appendicitis with a well-formed abscess or inflammatory mass. Recent data suggest that interval appendectomy may not be necessary after initial non-operative management of complicated appendicitis.

Delaying surgery to perform CT scans for suspected appendicitis decreases the rate of negative appendectomies without increasing the rate of perforation nor postoperative complications

PURPOSE

Negative appendectomies are costly and are embedded with unnecessary risks for the patients. A careful indication for surgery seems mandatory even more so, since conservative therapy emerges as a potential alternative to surgery. The aims of this population-based study were to analyze whether radiological examinations for suspected appendicitis decreased the rate of negative appendectomies without increasing the rate of perforation or worsening postoperative outcomes.

METHOD

This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospective population-based database. The data collection included preoperative investigations and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Based on 2559 patients, the rate of negative appendectomies decreased significantly with the use of CT scan as compared to clinical evaluation only (9.3 vs 5 %, p = 0.019), whereas ultrasonography alone was not able to decrease this rate (9.3 vs 6.2 %, p = 0.074). Delaying surgery for radiological investigation did not increase the rate of perforation (18.1 vs 19.2 %; adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.01; 0.8-1.3; p = 0.899). Postoperative complications (surgical reintervention, postoperative wound infection, postoperative hematoma, postoperative intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative ileus) were all comparable.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, CT scan was the only radiological modality that significantly reduced the rate of negative appendectomy. The delay induced by such additional imaging did not increase perforation nor complication rates. Abdominal CT scans for suspected appendicitis should therefore be more frequently used if clinical findings are unconclusive.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Right Lower Quadrant Pain--Suspected Appendicitis

The most common cause of acute right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain requiring surgery is acute appendicitis (AA). This narrative's focus is on imaging procedures in the diagnosis of AA, with consideration of other diseases causing RLQ pain. In general, Computed Tomography (CT) is the most accurate imaging study for evaluating suspected AA and alternative etiologies of RLQ pain. Data favor intravenous contrast use for CT, but the need for enteric contrast when intravenous contrast is used is not strongly favored. Radiation exposure concerns from CT have led to increased investigation in minimizing CT radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic accuracy and in using algorithms with ultrasound as a first imaging examination followed by CT in inconclusive cases. In children, ultrasound is the preferred initial examination, as it is nearly as accurate as CT for the diagnosis of AA in this population and without ionizing radiation exposure. In pregnant women, ultrasound is preferred initially with MRI as a second imaging examination in inconclusive cases, which is the majority.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every three years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in abscess drainage--feasibility and clinical value

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of intracavitary-applied contrast-enhanced ultrasound (ICCEUS) with BR1 in ultrasound-guided puncture and drainage of abdominal and pelvic abscesses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 71 consecutive patients received ICCEUS after placement of a drainage catheter or a needle in abdominal or pelvic abscesses. Portions of 0.1 ml of BR1 and 20 ml of saline were injected through the drainage catheter or needle. Ultrasound recordings were evaluated to answer the following questions: correct placement of the catheter by showing enhancement in the cavity and the drain - ICCEUS findings suggesting incomplete enhancement in all abscess cavities - enhancement in non-abscess structures.

RESULTS

About 52% of patients had liver, 14% of patients had intraperitoneal, 11% had subphrenic, 14% had retroperitoneal, 6% had splenic, and 4% had pelvic abscesses. The majority of the patients received drain placement with 10-F using trocar technique. Enhancement in the drain or needle was seen in all patients. In 2% of patients, during the initial approach, a dislodgment of the catheter from the abscess cavity was diagnosed. Due to non-enhancing abscess compartments, in 36% of the patients more than one drainage treatment was necessary at the time of the first approach. In 14% of the patients communication with surrounding structures was diagnosed. Additional treatment resulted in 4% of cases.

CONCLUSION

ICCEUS was helpful in all patients to confirm correct placement of drain or puncture needle. In 40% of patients, as a consequence of ICCEUS, additional therapy was scheduled, either additional drainage or abscess puncture, endoscopic retrograde drainage of the biliary or pancreatic duct or thoracic intervention.

Abscess due to perforated appendicitis: factors associated with successful percutaneous drainage

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous drainage is the standard treatment for perforated appendicitis with abscess. We studied factors associated with complete resolution (CR) with percutaneous drainage alone.

METHODS

Ninety-eight patients underwent percutaneous drainage for acute appendicitis complicated by abscess (October 1990 to September 2010). CR was defined as clinical recovery, resolution of the abscess on imaging, and drain removal without recurrence. Patients achieving CR were compared with patients not achieving CR.

RESULTS

The rate of CR was 78.6% (n = 77). Abscess grade was the only radiological factor associated with CR (P = .007). The CR rate was higher with transgluteal drainage (90.9% vs 79.2%) than with other anatomic approaches (P = .018) and higher with computed tomography-guided drainage than with ultrasound-guided drainage (82.7% vs 64.3%, P = .046).

CONCLUSION

CR was more likely to be achieved in patients with lower abscess grade, computed tomography-guided drainage, and a transgluteal approach.

The role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated air collections: an institutional experience

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with the role of CT-guided percutaneous drainage of loculated intra-abdominal collections consisting entirely of gas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An IRB-approved retrospective study analyzing patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections over an 8-year period was undertaken. Seven patients referred for percutaneous drainage were included. Size of collections, subsequent development of fluid, and microbiological yield were determined. Clinical outcome was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 2835 patients referred for percutaneous drainage between 2004 and 2012, seven patients (5M, 2F; average age 63, range 54-85) met criteria for inclusion with CT showing air-only collections. Percutaneous drain placement (five 8 Fr, one 10 Fr, and one 12 Fr) using Seldinger technique was performed. Four patients (57%) had recently undergone surgery (2 Whipple, 1 colectomy, 1 hepatic resection) while two (29%) had a remote surgery (1 abdominoperineal resection, 1 sigmoidectomy). Despite the lack of detectable fluid on the original CT, 6 patients (86%) had air and fluid aspirated at drainage, 5 (83%) of the aspirates developed positive microbacterial cultures. Four patients (57%) presented with fever at the time of the initial scan, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid. Four patients (57%) had leukocytosis, all of whom had positive cultures from aspirated fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

Although relatively rare in occurrence, patients with air-only intra-abdominal collections with signs of infection should be considered for percutaneous management similar to that of conventional infected fluid collections. Although fluid is not visible on CT, these collections can produce fluid that contains organisms.

Diagnosis and management of hemorrhagic complications of interventional radiology procedures

Image-guided interventions have allowed for minimally invasive treatment of many common diseases, obviating the need for open surgery. While percutaneous interventions usually represent a safer approach than traditional surgical alternatives, complications do arise nonetheless. Inadvertent injury to blood vessels represents one of the most common types of complications, and its affect can range from inconsequential to catastrophic. The interventional radiologist must be prepared to manage hemorrhagic risks from percutaneous interventions. This manuscript discusses this type of iatrogenic injury, as well as preventative measures and treatments for postintervention bleeding.

Transiliopsoas approach: an alternative route to drain pelvic abscesses in children

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an alternative route of pelvic abscess drainage in children via a transiliopsoas approach.

BACKGROUND

Appendiceal perforations complicated by inflammatory masses, such as abscesses or phlegmon, are a common indication for abdominal drainage in pediatric interventional radiology. Certain locations of collections may present particular challenges for the operator, owing to numerous surrounding structures, including bowel and other pelvic anatomy. This series describes an alternative route for drainage, which involves traversing the iliopsoas muscle under US guidance to drain a deep pelvic abscess.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed of the transiliopsoas approach for abscess drainage during a 5-year period. The technique, pre- and post-drainage imaging, aspiration/drain output, duration of catheter dwell, procedure-related complications and abscess recurrence were reviewed.

RESULTS

Transiliopsoas needle placement was successful in 14 of 14 patients (100%). Catheter placement was successful in 13 patients. Abscess wall rupture precluded catheter placement in one patient. Mean catheter duration was 4.9 days, with a range of 2 to 9 days. Clinical improvement was achieved in all 14 patients (100%). There were no major complications. Post-procedure pain with ambulation was reported in 3 of 14 patients (21.4%), which was successfully controlled in each case with medication, and resolved after 2 days.

CONCLUSION

The transiliopsoas route is a safe and effective route for US-guided abscess drainage and catheter placement in children with deep pelvic collections. In selected cases, this approach provides a more easily accessible and safer route than more traditional interventional approaches.

Is there truly an oncologic indication for interval appendectomy?

BACKGROUND

The rate of recurrent appendicitis is low following nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis. However, recent data suggest an increased rate of neoplasms in these cases.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective review of patients with acute appendicitis at 2 university-affiliated community hospitals over a 12-year period. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of appendiceal neoplasm following interval appendectomy.

RESULTS

Six thousand thirty-eight patients presented with acute appendicitis. Appendectomy was performed in 5,851 (97%) patients at the index admission. Of the 188 patients treated with initial nonoperative management, 89 (47%) underwent interval appendectomy. Appendiceal neoplasms were identified in 11 of the 89 (12%) patients. These included mucinous neoplasms (n = 6), carcinoid tumors (n = 4), and adenocarcinoma (n = 1). The rate of neoplasm in patients over age 40 was 16%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant rate of neoplasms identified in patient over age 40 undergoing interval appendectomy. This should be considered following nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis.

Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous CT-Guided Drainage in the Management of Abdominopelvic Abscess

Background:

Abdominopelvic fluid collection and abscess management and their outcomes have improved in the recent years due to innovation of the image-guided drainage technique and improvement of surgical procedures

Objectives:

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous drainage in treating abdominopelvic abscesses.

Patients and Methods:

In this study, the data of 41 patients who had abdominal abscess or fluid collections, and underwent treatment by percutaneous CT-guided drainage were analyzed. Treatment was assessed by reduction of collection size, relief of symptoms and signs including abdominal pain and fever and imaging findings. Any morbidity such as wound infection, sepsis, hematoma formation or peritonitis was followed up to six months after the procedure.

Results:

The average age of the patients was 54 years (range 12 to 79), including 21 (51%) men and 20 (49%) women. The common signs and symptoms were pain (83%) and fever (80.5%). The most prevalent abdominal abscess etiology was previous surgery in 31 cases (75.5%). Abscess diameter ranged between 5 and 12 cm (mean, 7.8 cm). The average hospital stay was 8 days (4-15). Thirty five cases (86%) were successfully treated. Only one case (2.5%) developed complication (peritonitis) after the procedure.

Conclusions:

According to our findings, CT-guided percutaneous drainage is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of abdominal abscess and fluid collection.

Drainage of periappendiceal abscess and removal of free fecalith--extraperitoneal approach

Treatment of complicated acute appendicitis is controversial. The dilemma is further complicated by presence of free fecalith in a well-circumscribed abscess, which has been repeatedly demonstrated to be a major predicting factor of treatment failure of nonoperative treatment of acute appendicitis complicated with appendiceal abscess. If left behind after drainage of the abscess, further operations for removal of retained fecalith or recurrence of abscess might be required. However, little had been stressed over the significance of removal of the free fecalith when it was first encountered. We report our experience of drainage of appendiceal abscess and removal of free fecalith by taking an extraperitoneal approach. Both of our cases made a smooth recovery without any complication or recurrence after a 2-year follow-up. Treatment with this approach avoids many of the complications associated with formal laparotomy. Unlike image-guided drainage or laparoscopic drainage, this procedure is relatively simple and straightforward and can be performed in any level of hospital, including private practitioners and in less well-developed areas and countries. With proper case selection, we recommend this approach as one of the alternatives in the treatment of late-presenting appendiceal abscess with free fecalith.

Predictive factors for failure of percutaneous drainage of postoperative abscess after abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy of percutaneous drainage of postoperative abscess after abdominal surgery and to identify factors predictive of failed drainage.

METHODS

Data from 81 patients with postoperative abdominopelvic abscesses treated with percutaneous drainage were reviewed. Percutaneous drainage failure was considered when surgery was needed to control the sepsis. Predictive variables were sought using univariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Successful drainage requiring 1 (n = 46) or 2 (n = 17) procedures was observed in 63 patients (78%; 95% confidence interval, 67%-86%). Surgery was needed in 18 patients (22%; 95% confidence interval, 14%-38%). Residual collection after a first percutaneous drainage was the single predictive factor for failed drainage on univariate and multivariate analyses (P = .0275).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous imaging-guided drainage is a feasible and effective method for the treatment of abdominopelvic abscess, with a success rate of 78%. Residual collection is an independent predictor of unfavorable outcome after percutaneous drainage.

Management of Complicated Appendicitis in the Pediatric Population: When Surgery Doesn't Cut It

The management of complicated appendicitis in children has evolved significantly over the last century. What initially was a surgeon's dilemma is becoming the interventional radiologist's task because image-guided percutaneous drainage of abscesses from a ruptured appendix obviates the need for urgent surgery and allows for selective interval appendectomy at the surgeon's discretion (versus conservative nonoperative management in selected cases). This paradigm shift places the onus on the interventional radiologist to recognize when the procedure is emergently indicated and to be cognizant of the special needs of a pediatric patient.

The value of a laparoscopic interval appendectomy for treatment of a periappendiceal abscess: experience of a single medical center

BACKGROUND

Interval appendectomy has been known to be an effective and safe treatment for a periappendiceal abscess, but there is no study on a laparoscopic approach for the treatment of a periappendiceal abscess. The aim of this study is to investigate the value of laparoscopic interval appendectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 56 patients who had been admitted due to a periappendiceal abscess to Chungbuk National University Hospital from July 2005 to June 2010. Fifteen patients underwent an initial conservative treatment and interval appendectomy. Medical records were reviewed for the postoperative hospital course such as complications, time of initiation of diet, time since stopping antibiotics, symptoms' relief period, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

All patients received initial conservative treatment [percutaneous drainage insertion (1 case failed) and intravenous antibiotics], and the initial length of hospital stay was 11.6±4.3 days. Percutaneous drainage was removed a mean of 21.7±9.4 days after the initial treatment. Interval appendectomy was performed at a mean of 64.0±17.8 days after initial admission. The duration of use of intravenous antibiotics was a mean of 4.1±1.8 days after laparoscopic interval appendectomy. The complication rate was 1 (6.7%) and the open conversion rate was 1 (6.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that initial conservative treatment and laparoscopic interval appendectomy represented a feasible and effective treatment for patients with a periappendiceal abscess.

Antibiotics versus appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis: a review of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis remains the most common cause of the acute abdomen in young adults, and the mainstay of treatment in most centres is an appendectomy. However, treatment for other intra-abdominal inflammatory processes, such as diverticulitis, consists initially of conservative management with antibiotics. The aim of this study was to determine the role of antibiotics in the management of acute appendicitis and to assess if appendectomy remains the gold standard of care.

METHODS

A literature search using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library identified studies published between 1999 and 2009, and we reviewed all relevant articles. The articles were critiqued using the Public Health Resource Unit (2006) appraisal tools.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 41 papers, and we identified a total of 13 papers within the criteria specified. All of these papers, while posing pertinent questions and demonstrating the role of antibiotics as a bridge to surgery, failed to adequately justify their findings that antibiotics could be used as a definitive treatment of acute appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

Appendectomy remains the gold standard of treatment for acute appendicitis based on the current evidence.