1
|
Woodworth CF, Frota Lima LM, Bartholmai BJ, Koo CW. Imaging of Solid Pulmonary Nodules. Clin Chest Med 2024; 45:249-261. [PMID: 38816086 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2023.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Early detection with accurate classification of solid pulmonary nodules is critical in reducing lung cancer morbidity and mortality. Computed tomography (CT) remains the most widely used imaging examination for pulmonary nodule evaluation; however, other imaging modalities, such as PET/CT and MRI, are increasingly used for nodule characterization. Current advances in solid nodule imaging are largely due to developments in machine learning, including automated nodule segmentation and computer-aided detection. This review explores current multi-modality solid pulmonary nodule detection and characterization with discussion of radiomics and risk prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire F Woodworth
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Livia Maria Frota Lima
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Brian J Bartholmai
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Chi Wan Koo
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hardie RC, Trout AT, Dillman JR, Narayanan BN, Tanimoto AA. Performance Analysis in Children of Traditional and Deep Learning CT Lung Nodule Computer-Aided Detection Systems Trained on Adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222:e2330345. [PMID: 37991333 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Although primary lung cancer is rare in children, chest CT is commonly performed to assess for lung metastases in children with cancer. Lung nodule computer-aided detection (CAD) systems have been designed and studied primarily using adult training data, and the efficacy of such systems when applied to pediatric patients is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in children the diagnostic performance of traditional and deep learning CAD systems trained with adult data for the detection of lung nodules on chest CT scans and to compare the ability of such systems to generalize to children versus to other adults. METHODS. This retrospective study included pediatric and adult chest CT test sets. The pediatric test set comprised 59 CT scans in 59 patients (30 boys, 29 girls; mean age, 13.1 years; age range, 4-17 years), which were obtained from November 30, 2018, to August 31, 2020; lung nodules were annotated by fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists as the reference standard. The adult test set was the publicly available adult Lung Nodule Analysis (LUNA) 2016 subset 0, which contained 89 deidentified scans with previously annotated nodules. The test sets were processed through the traditional FlyerScan (github.com/rhardie1/FlyerScanCT) and deep learning Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence (MONAI; github.com/Project-MONAI/model-zoo/releases) lung nodule CAD systems, which had been trained on separate sets of CT scans in adults. Sensitivity and false-positive (FP) frequency were calculated for nodules measuring 3-30 mm; nonoverlapping 95% CIs indicated significant differences. RESULTS. Operating at two FPs per scan, on pediatric testing data FlyerScan and MONAI showed significantly lower detection sensitivities of 68.4% (197/288; 95% CI, 65.1-73.0%) and 53.1% (153/288; 95% CI, 46.7-58.4%), respectively, than on adult LUNA 2016 subset 0 testing data (83.9% [94/112; 95% CI, 79.1-88.0%] and 95.5% [107/112; 95% CI, 90.0-98.4%], respectively). Mean nodule size was smaller (p < .001) in the pediatric testing data (5.4 ± 3.1 [SD] mm) than in the adult LUNA 2016 subset 0 testing data (11.0 ± 6.2 mm). CONCLUSION. Adult-trained traditional and deep learning-based lung nodule CAD systems had significantly lower sensitivity for detection on pediatric data than on adult data at a matching FP frequency. The performance difference may relate to the smaller size of pediatric lung nodules. CLINICAL IMPACT. The results indicate a need for pediatric-specific lung nodule CAD systems trained on data specific to pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell C Hardie
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH 45469
| | - Andrew T Trout
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Jonathan R Dillman
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Barath N Narayanan
- Sensor and Software Systems, University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH
| | - Aki A Tanimoto
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martin MD, Henry TS, Berry MF, Johnson GB, Kelly AM, Ko JP, Kuzniewski CT, Lee E, Maldonado F, Morris MF, Munden RF, Raptis CA, Shim K, Sirajuddin A, Small W, Tong BC, Wu CC, Donnelly EF. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Incidentally Detected Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodule. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S455-S470. [PMID: 38040464 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Incidental pulmonary nodules are common. Although the majority are benign, most are indeterminate for malignancy when first encountered making their management challenging. CT remains the primary imaging modality to first characterize and follow-up incidental lung nodules. This document reviews available literature on various imaging modalities and summarizes management of indeterminate pulmonary nodules detected incidentally. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria D Martin
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
| | | | - Mark F Berry
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Society of Thoracic Surgeons
| | - Geoffrey B Johnson
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | | - Jane P Ko
- New York University Langone Health, New York, New York; IF Committee
| | | | - Elizabeth Lee
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Fabien Maldonado
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; American College of Chest Physicians
| | | | - Reginald F Munden
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; IF Committee
| | | | - Kyungran Shim
- John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois; American College of Physicians
| | | | - William Small
- Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, Illinois; Commission on Radiation Oncology
| | - Betty C Tong
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Society of Thoracic Surgeons
| | - Carol C Wu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Edwin F Donnelly
- Specialty Chair, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee JJB, Suh YJ, Oh C, Lee BM, Kim JS, Chang Y, Jeon YJ, Kim JY, Park SY, Chang JS. Automated Computer-aided Detection of Lung Nodules in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients for the Identification of Pulmonary Oligometastatic Disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:1045-1052. [PMID: 36028066 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to explore the possibility and clinical utility of existing artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules to identify pulmonary oligometastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS The chest computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with lung metastasis from colorectal cancer between March 2006 and November 2018 were analyzed. The patients were selected from a database of 1,395 patients and studied in two cohorts. The first cohort included 50 patients and the CT scans of these patients were independently evaluated for lung nodule (≥3 mm) detection by a CAD-assisted radiation oncologist (CAD-RO) as well as an expert radiologist. Inter-observer variability in additional two radiation oncologists and two thoracic surgeons was also measured. In the second cohort of 305 patients, survival outcomes were evaluated based on the number of CAD-RO-detected nodules. RESULTS In the first cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of the CAD-RO for the identification of oligometastatic disease (OMD) from varying criteria by ≤2 nodules, ≤3 nodules, ≤4 nodules, and ≤5 nodules were 71.9% and 88.9%; 82.9% and 93.3%; 97.1% and 73.3%; and 97.5% and 90.0%, respectively. The sensitivity of the CAD-RO in the nodule detection compared with the radiologist was 81.6%. The average (standard deviation) sensitivity in inter-observer variability analysis was 80.0% (3.7%). In the second cohort, the 5-year survival rates of patients with 1, 2, 3, 4, or ≥5 metastatic nodules were 75.2%, 52.9%, 45.7%, 29.1%, and 22.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Proper identification of the pulmonary OMD and the correlation between the number of CAD-RO-detected nodules and survival suggest the potential practicality of AI in OMD recognition. Developing a deep learning-based model specific to the metastatic setting, which enables a quick estimation of disease burden and identification of OMD, is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Joon Bock Lee
- Deparment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Joo Suh
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Caleb Oh
- Deparment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Min Lee
- Deparment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Deparment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Yeong Jeong Jeon
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Young Kim
- Deparment of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Yong Park
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Deparment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shu J, Wen D, Xu Z, Meng X, Zhang Z, Lin S, Zheng M. Improved interobserver agreement on nodule type and Lung-RADS classification of subsolid nodules using computer-aided solid component measurement. Eur J Radiol 2022; 152:110339. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
6
|
Ko JP, Bagga B, Gozansky E, Moore WH. Solitary Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation: Pearls and Pitfalls. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2022; 43:230-245. [PMID: 35688534 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Lung nodules are frequently encountered while interpreting chest CTs and are challenging to detect, characterize, and manage given they can represent both benign or malignant etiologies. An understanding of features associated with malignancy and causes of interpretive pitfalls is helpful to avoid misdiagnoses. This review addresses pertinent topics related to the etiologies for missed lung nodules on radiography and CT. Additionally, CT imaging technical pitfalls and challenges in addition to issues in the evaluation of nodule morphology, attenuation, and size will be discussed. Nodule management guidelines will be addressed as well as recent investigations that further our understanding of lung nodules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane P Ko
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
| | - Barun Bagga
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Elliott Gozansky
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - William H Moore
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Au C, Reeves R, Li Z, Gingold E, Halpern E, Sundaram B. Impact of multidetector computed tomography scan parameters, novel reconstruction settings, and lung nodule characteristics on nodule diameter measurements: A Phantom Study. Med Phys 2022; 49:3936-3943. [PMID: 35358333 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Novel CT reconstruction techniques strive to maintain image quality and processing efficiency. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of a newer hybrid iterative reconstruction technique, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) in combination with various CT scan parameters on the semi-automated quantification using various lung nodules. METHODS A chest phantom embedded with eight spherical objects was scanned using varying CT parameters such as tube current and ASIR-V levels. We calculated absolute percentage error (APE) and mean APE (MAPE) using differences between the semi-automated measured diameters and known dimensions. Predictive variables were assessed using a multivariable general linear model. The linear regression slope coefficients (β) were reported to demonstrate effect size and directionality. RESULTS The APE of the semi-automated measured diameters was higher in ground-glass than solid nodules (β = 9.000, p<0.001). APE had an inverse relationship with nodule diameter (mm; β = -3.499, p<0.001) and tube current (mA; β = -0.006, p<0.001). MAPE did not vary based on the ASIR-V level (range: 5.7-13.1%). CONCLUSION Error is dominated by nodule characteristics with a small effect of tube current. Regardless of phantom size, nodule size accuracy is not affected by tube voltage or ASIR-V level, maintaining accuracy while maximizing radiation dose reduction. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherry Au
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1620 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Russell Reeves
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
| | - Zhenteng Li
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107.,The Vascular Center, St. Luke's Anderson Campus - Medical Office Building, 1700 St. Luke's Boulevard, Suite 301, Easton, PA
| | - Eric Gingold
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
| | - Ethan Halpern
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
| | - Baskaran Sundaram
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 111 S 11th St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jacobs C, Schreuder A, van Riel SJ, Scholten ET, Wittenberg R, Wille MMW, de Hoop B, Sprengers R, Mets OM, Geurts B, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop C, van Ginneken B. Assisted versus Manual Interpretation of Low-Dose CT Scans for Lung Cancer Screening: Impact on Lung-RADS Agreement. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2021; 3:e200160. [PMID: 34559005 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2021200160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To compare the inter- and intraobserver agreement and reading times achieved when assigning Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) categories to baseline and follow-up lung cancer screening studies by using a dedicated CT lung screening viewer with integrated nodule detection and volumetric support with those achieved by using a standard picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-like viewer. Materials and Methods Data were obtained from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). By using data recorded by NLST radiologists, scans were assigned to Lung-RADS categories. For each Lung-RADS category (1 or 2, 3, 4A, and 4B), 40 CT scans (20 baseline scans and 20 follow-up scans) were randomly selected for 160 participants (median age, 61 years; interquartile range, 58-66 years; 61 women) in total. Seven blinded observers independently read all CT scans twice in a randomized order with a 2-week washout period: once by using the standard PACS-like viewer and once by using the dedicated viewer. Observers were asked to assign a Lung-RADS category to each scan and indicate the risk-dominant nodule. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was analyzed by using Fleiss κ values and Cohen weighted κ values, respectively. Reading times were compared by using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results The interobserver agreement was moderate for the standard viewer and substantial for the dedicated viewer, with Fleiss κ values of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.60) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64, 0.68), respectively. The intraobserver agreement was substantial, with a mean Cohen weighted κ value of 0.67. The median reading time was significantly reduced from 160 seconds with the standard viewer to 86 seconds with the dedicated viewer (P < .001). Conclusion Lung-RADS interobserver agreement increased from moderate to substantial when using the dedicated CT lung screening viewer. The median reading time was substantially reduced when scans were read by using the dedicated CT lung screening viewer. Keywords: CT, Thorax, Lung, Computer Applications-Detection/Diagnosis, Observer Performance, Technology Assessment Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Jacobs
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Anton Schreuder
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Sarah J van Riel
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Ernst Th Scholten
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Rianne Wittenberg
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Mathilde M Winkler Wille
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Bartjan de Hoop
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Ralf Sprengers
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Onno M Mets
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Bram Geurts
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Mathias Prokop
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| | - Bram van Ginneken
- From the Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.J., A.S., S.J.v.R., E.T.S., B.G., M.P., C.S.P., B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.W.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Section of Radiology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark (M.M.W.W.); Department of Radiology, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Winterswijk, the Netherlands (B.d.H.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.S.P.); Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (O.M.M.); Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (O.M.M., R.S.); and Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany (B.v.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prospective Study of Spatial Distribution of Missed Lung Nodules by Readers in CT Lung Screening Using Computer-assisted Detection. Acad Radiol 2021; 28:647-654. [PMID: 32305166 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the spatial patterns of missed lung nodules in a real-life routine screening environment. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a screening institute, 4,822 consecutive adults underwent chest CT, and each image set was independently interpreted by two radiologists in three steps: (1) independently interpreted without computer-assisted detection (CAD) software, (2) independently referred to the CAD results, (3) determined by the consensus of the two radiologists. The locations of nodules and the detection performance data were semi-automatically collected using a CAD server integrated into the reporting system. Fisher's exact test was employed for evaluating findings in different lung divisions. Probability maps were drawn to illustrate the spatial distribution of radiologists' missed nodules. RESULTS Radiologists significantly tended to miss lung nodules in the bilateral hilar divisions (p < 0.01). Some radiologists had their own spatial pattern of missed lung nodules. CONCLUSION Radiologists tend to miss lung nodules present in the hilar regions significantly more often than in the rest of the lung.
Collapse
|
10
|
Couraud S, Ferretti G, Milleron B, Cortot A, Girard N, Gounant V, Laurent F, Leleu O, Quoix E, Revel MP, Wislez M, Westeel V, Zalcman G, Scherpereel A, Khalil A. [Recommendations of French specialists on screening for lung cancer]. Rev Mal Respir 2021; 38:310-325. [PMID: 33637394 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Couraud
- Service de pneumologie aiguë spécialisée et cancérologie thoracique, hospices civils de Lyon, hôpital Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France; Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France.
| | - G Ferretti
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service de radiologie diagnostique et interventionnel, CHU de Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - B Milleron
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France
| | - A Cortot
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service de pneumologie et oncologie thoracique, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - N Girard
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Unité d'oncologie thoracique, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - V Gounant
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service d'oncologie thoracique, groupe hospitalier Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - F Laurent
- Service de radiologie, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - O Leleu
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service de pneumologie, centre hospitalier Abbeville, Abbeville, France
| | - E Quoix
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service de pneumologie, CHRU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - M-P Revel
- Service de radiologie, hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - M Wislez
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service d'oncologie thoracique, hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - V Westeel
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service de pneumologie et cancérologie thoracique, CHU de Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - G Zalcman
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service d'oncologie thoracique, groupe hospitalier Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - A Scherpereel
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service de pneumologie et oncologie thoracique, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - A Khalil
- Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Paris, France; Service de radiologie, groupe hospitalier Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Intergroupe francophone de cancérologie thoracique, Société de pneumologie de langue française, and Société d'imagerie thoracique statement paper on lung cancer screening. Diagn Interv Imaging 2021; 102:199-211. [PMID: 33648872 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2021.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Following the American National Lung Screening Trial results in 2011 a consortium of French experts met to edit a statement. Recent results of other randomized trials gave the opportunity for our group to meet again in order to edit updated guidelines. After literature review, we provide here a new update on lung cancer screening in France. Notably, in accordance with all international guidelines, the experts renew their recommendation in favor of individual screening for lung cancer in France as per the conditions laid out in this document. In addition, the experts recommend the very rapid organization and funding of prospective studies, which, if conclusive, will enable the deployment of lung cancer screening organized at the national level.
Collapse
|
12
|
Park S, Lee SM, Kim W, Park H, Jung KH, Do KH, Seo JB. Computer-aided Detection of Subsolid Nodules at Chest CT: Improved Performance with Deep Learning-based CT Section Thickness Reduction. Radiology 2021; 299:211-219. [PMID: 33560190 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021203387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Studies on the optimal CT section thickness for detecting subsolid nodules (SSNs) with computer-aided detection (CAD) are lacking. Purpose To assess the effect of CT section thickness on CAD performance in the detection of SSNs and to investigate whether deep learning-based super-resolution algorithms for reducing CT section thickness can improve performance. Materials and Methods CT images obtained with 1-, 3-, and 5-mm-thick sections were obtained in patients who underwent surgery between March 2018 and December 2018. Patients with resected synchronous SSNs and those without SSNs (negative controls) were retrospectively evaluated. The SSNs, which ranged from 6 to 30 mm, were labeled ground-truth lesions. A deep learning-based CAD system was applied to SSN detection on CT images of each section thickness and those converted from 3- and 5-mm section thickness into 1-mm section thickness by using the super-resolution algorithm. The CAD performance on each section thickness was evaluated and compared by using the jackknife alternative free response receiver operating characteristic figure of merit. Results A total of 308 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 62 years ± 10; 183 women) with 424 SSNs (310 part-solid and 114 nonsolid nodules) and 182 patients without SSNs (mean age, 65 years ± 10; 97 men) were evaluated. The figures of merit differed across the three section thicknesses (0.92, 0.90, and 0.89 for 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively; P = .04) and between 1- and 5-mm sections (P = .04). The figures of merit varied for nonsolid nodules (0.78, 0.72, and 0.66 for 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively; P < .001) but not for part-solid nodules (range, 0.93-0.94; P = .76). The super-resolution algorithm improved CAD sensitivity on 3- and 5-mm-thick sections (P = .02 for 3 mm, P < .001 for 5 mm). Conclusion Computer-aided detection (CAD) of subsolid nodules performed better at 1-mm section thickness CT than at 3- and 5-mm section thickness CT, particularly with nonsolid nodules. Application of a super-resolution algorithm improved the sensitivity of CAD at 3- and 5-mm section thickness CT. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Goo in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohee Park
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea (S.P., S.M.L., W.K., K.H.D., J.B.S.); and VUNO, Seoul, South Korea (H.P., K.H.J.)
| | - Sang Min Lee
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea (S.P., S.M.L., W.K., K.H.D., J.B.S.); and VUNO, Seoul, South Korea (H.P., K.H.J.)
| | - Wooil Kim
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea (S.P., S.M.L., W.K., K.H.D., J.B.S.); and VUNO, Seoul, South Korea (H.P., K.H.J.)
| | - Hyunho Park
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea (S.P., S.M.L., W.K., K.H.D., J.B.S.); and VUNO, Seoul, South Korea (H.P., K.H.J.)
| | - Kyu-Hwan Jung
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea (S.P., S.M.L., W.K., K.H.D., J.B.S.); and VUNO, Seoul, South Korea (H.P., K.H.J.)
| | - Kyung-Hyun Do
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea (S.P., S.M.L., W.K., K.H.D., J.B.S.); and VUNO, Seoul, South Korea (H.P., K.H.J.)
| | - Joon Beom Seo
- From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea (S.P., S.M.L., W.K., K.H.D., J.B.S.); and VUNO, Seoul, South Korea (H.P., K.H.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Perl RM, Grimmer R, Hepp T, Horger MS. Can a Novel Deep Neural Network Improve the Computer-Aided Detection of Solid Pulmonary Nodules and the Rate of False-Positive Findings in Comparison to an Established Machine Learning Computer-Aided Detection? Invest Radiol 2021; 56:103-108. [PMID: 32796198 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 2 approved computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for detection of pulmonary solid nodules (PSNs) in an oncologic cohort. The first CAD system is based on a conventional machine learning approach (VD10F), and the other is based on a deep 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) CAD software (VD20A). METHODS AND MATERIALS Nine hundred sixty-seven patients with a total of 2451 PSNs were retrospectively evaluated using the 2 different CAD systems. All patients had thin-slice chest computed tomography (0.6 mm) using 100 kV and 100 mAs and a high-resolution kernel (I50f). The CAD images generated by VD10F were transferred to the PACS for evaluation. The images generated by VD20A were evaluated using a Web browser-based viewer. Finally, a senior radiologist who was blinded for the CAD results examined the thin-slice images of every patient (ground truth). RESULTS A total of 2451 PSNs were detected by the senior radiologist. CAD-VD10F detected 1401 true-positive, 143 false-negative, 565 false-positive (FP), and 342 true-negative PSNs, resulting in sensitivity of 90.7%, specificity of 37.7%, positive predictive value of 0.71, and negative predictive value of 0.70. CAD-VD20A detected 1381 true-positive, 163 false-negative, 337 FP, and 570 true-negative PSNs, resulting in sensitivity of 89.4%, specificity of 62.8%, positive predictive value of 0.80, and negative predictive value 0.77, respectively. The rate of FP per scan was 0.6 for CAD-VD10F and 0.3 for CAD-VD20A. CONCLUSIONS The new deep learning-based CAD software (VD20A) shows similar sensitivity with the conventional CAD software (VD10F), but a significantly higher specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regine Mariette Perl
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | | | | | - Marius Stefan Horger
- From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Efficiency of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system with deep learning in detection of pulmonary nodules on 1-mm-thick images of computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 2020; 38:1052-1061. [PMID: 32592003 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-020-01009-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the performance of a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system at detecting pulmonary nodules on CT by comparing radiologists' readings with and without CAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 120 chest CT images were randomly selected from patients with suspected lung cancer. The gold standard of nodules ≥ 3 mm was established by a panel of three expert radiologists. Two less experienced radiologists read the images without and afterward with CAD system. Their reading times were recorded. RESULTS The radiologists' sensitivity increased from 20.9% to 38.0% with the introduction of CAD. The positive predictive value (PPV) decreased from 70.5% to 61.8%, and the F1-score increased from 32.2% to 47.0%. The sensitivity significantly increased from 13.7% to 32.4% for small nodules (3-6 mm) and from 33.3% to 47.6% for medium nodules (6-10 mm). CAD alone showed a sensitivity of 70.3%, a PPV of 57.9%, and an F1-score of 63.5%. Reading time decreased by 11.3% with the use of CAD. CONCLUSION CAD improved the less experienced radiologists' sensitivity in detecting pulmonary nodules of all sizes, especially including a significant improvement in the detection of clinically important-sized medium nodules (6-10 mm) as well as small nodules (3-6 mm) and reduced their reading time.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this study is to assess the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system (INTACT system) for the automatic classification of high-resolution computed tomography images into 4 radiological diagnostic categories and to compare this with the performance of radiologists on the same task. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the comparison, a total of 105 cases of pulmonary fibrosis were studied (54 cases of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and 51 cases of usual interstitial pneumonia). All diagnoses were interstitial lung disease board consensus diagnoses (radiologically or histologically proven cases) and were retrospectively selected from our database. Two subspecialized chest radiologists made a consensual ground truth radiological diagnosis, according to the Fleischner Society recommendations. A comparison analysis was performed between the INTACT system and 2 other radiologists with different years of experience (readers 1 and 2). The INTACT system consists of a sequential pipeline in which first the anatomical structures of the lung are segmented, then the various types of pathological lung tissue are identified and characterized, and this information is then fed to a random forest classifier able to recommend a radiological diagnosis. RESULTS Reader 1, reader 2, and INTACT achieved similar accuracy for classifying pulmonary fibrosis into the original 4 categories: 0.6, 0.54, and 0.56, respectively, with P > 0.45. The INTACT system achieved an F-score (harmonic mean for precision and recall) of 0.56, whereas the 2 readers, on average, achieved 0.57 (P = 0.991). For the pooled classification (2 groups, with and without the need for biopsy), reader 1, reader 2, and CAD had similar accuracies of 0.81, 0.70, and 0.81, respectively. The F-score was again similar for the CAD system and the radiologists. The CAD system and the average reader reached F-scores of 0.80 and 0.79 (P = 0.898). CONCLUSIONS We found that a computer-aided detection algorithm based on machine learning was able to classify idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with similar accuracy to a human reader.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kuo CFJ, Huang CC, Siao JJ, Hsieh CW, Huy VQ, Ko KH, Hsu HH. Automatic lung nodule detection system using image processing techniques in computed tomography. Biomed Signal Process Control 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2019.101659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
17
|
Lung Nodule: Imaging Features and Evaluation in the Age of Machine Learning. CURRENT PULMONOLOGY REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s13665-019-00229-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
18
|
Aissa J, Schaarschmidt BM, Below J, Bethge OT, Böven J, Sawicki LM, Hoff NP, Kröpil P, Antoch G, Boos J. Performance and clinical impact of machine learning based lung nodule detection using vessel suppression in melanoma patients. Clin Imaging 2018; 52:328-333. [PMID: 30236779 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate performance and the clinical impact of a novel machine learning based vessel-suppressing computer-aided detection (CAD) software in chest computed tomography (CT) of patients with malignant melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively included consecutive malignant melanoma patients with a chest CT between 01/2015 and 01/2016. Machine learning based CAD software was used to reconstruct additional vessel-suppressed axial images. Three radiologists independently reviewed a maximum of 15 lung nodules per patient. Vessel-suppressed reconstructions were reviewed independently and results were compared. Follow-up CT examinations and clinical follow-up were used to assess the outcome. Impact of additional nodules on clinical management was assessed. RESULTS In 46 patients, vessel-suppressed axial images led to the detection of additional nodules in 25/46 (54.3%) patients. CT or clinical follow up was available in 25/25 (100%) patients with additionally detected nodules. 2/25 (8%) of these patients developed new pulmonary metastases. None of the additionally detected nodules were found to be metastases. None of the lung nodules detected by the radiologists was missed by the CAD software. The mean diameter of the 92 additional nodules was 1.5 ± 0.8 mm. The additional nodules did not affect therapeutic management. However, in 14/46 (30.4%) of patients the additional nodules might have had an impact on the radiological follow-up recommendations. CONCLUSION Machine learning based vessel suppression led to the detection of significantly more lung nodules in melanoma patients. Radiological follow-up recommendations were altered in 30% of the patients. However, all lung nodules turned out to be non-malignant on follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Aissa
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany.
| | | | - Janina Below
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Clinic of Dermatology, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Oliver Th Bethge
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany
| | - Judith Böven
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany
| | - Lino Morris Sawicki
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany
| | - Norman-Philipp Hoff
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Clinic of Dermatology, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Patric Kröpil
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany
| | - Gerald Antoch
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany
| | - Johannes Boos
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
A cloud-based computer-aided detection system improves identification of lung nodules on computed tomography scans of patients with extra-thoracic malignancies. Eur Radiol 2018; 29:144-152. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5528-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
21
|
Vlahos I, Stefanidis K, Sheard S, Nair A, Sayer C, Moser J. Lung cancer screening: nodule identification and characterization. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2018; 7:288-303. [PMID: 30050767 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.05.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The accurate identification and characterization of small pulmonary nodules at low-dose CT is an essential requirement for the implementation of effective lung cancer screening. Individual reader detection performance is influenced by nodule characteristics and technical CT parameters but can be improved by training, the application of CT techniques, and by computer-aided techniques. However, the evaluation of nodule detection in lung cancer screening trials differs from the assessment of individual readers as it incorporates multiple readers, their inter-observer variability, reporting thresholds, and reflects the program accuracy in identifying lung cancer. Understanding detection and interpretation errors in screening trials aids in the implementation of lung cancer screening in clinical practice. Indeed, as CT screening moves to ever lower radiation doses, radiologists must be cognisant of new technical challenges in nodule assessment. Screen detected lung cancers demonstrate distinct morphological features from incidentally or symptomatically detected lung cancers. Hence characterization of screen detected nodules requires an awareness of emerging concepts in early lung cancer appearances and their impact on radiological assessment and malignancy prediction models. Ultimately many nodules remain indeterminate, but further imaging evaluation can be appropriate with judicious utilization of contrast enhanced CT or MRI techniques or functional evaluation by PET-CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Vlahos
- St George's NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust and School of Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | - Arjun Nair
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charles Sayer
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals Trust, Haywards Heath, UK
| | - Joanne Moser
- St George's NHS Foundation Hospitals Trust and School of Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Orooji M, Alilou M, Rakshit S, Beig N, Khorrami MH, Rajiah P, Thawani R, Ginsberg J, Donatelli C, Yang M, Jacono F, Gilkeson R, Velcheti V, Linden P, Madabhushi A. Combination of computer extracted shape and texture features enables discrimination of granulomas from adenocarcinoma on chest computed tomography. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2018; 5:024501. [PMID: 29721515 PMCID: PMC5904542 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.5.2.024501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Differentiation between benign and malignant nodules is a problem encountered by radiologists when visualizing computed tomography (CT) scans. Adenocarcinomas and granulomas have a characteristic spiculated appearance and may be fluorodeoxyglucose avid, making them difficult to distinguish for human readers. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate whether a combination of radiomic texture and shape features from noncontrast CT scans can enable discrimination between granulomas and adenocarcinomas. Our study is composed of CT scans of 195 patients from two institutions, one cohort for training ([Formula: see text]) and the other ([Formula: see text]) for independent validation. A set of 645 three-dimensional texture and 24 shape features were extracted from CT scans in the training cohort. Feature selection was employed to identify the most informative features using this set. The top ranked features were also assessed in terms of their stability and reproducibility across the training and testing cohorts and between scans of different slice thickness. Three different classifiers were constructed using the top ranked features identified from the training set. These classifiers were then validated on the test set and the best classifier (support vector machine) yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 77.8%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdi Orooji
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Mehdi Alilou
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Sagar Rakshit
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Niha Beig
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Mohammad Hadi Khorrami
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Prabhakar Rajiah
- UT Southwestern, Department of Radiology, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Rajat Thawani
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Jennifer Ginsberg
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Christopher Donatelli
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Michael Yang
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Frank Jacono
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Robert Gilkeson
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Vamsidhar Velcheti
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Philip Linden
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Silva M, Milanese G, Seletti V, Ariani A, Sverzellati N. Pulmonary quantitative CT imaging in focal and diffuse disease: current research and clinical applications. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170644. [PMID: 29172671 PMCID: PMC5965469 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The frenetic development of imaging technology-both hardware and software-provides exceptional potential for investigation of the lung. In the last two decades, CT was exploited for detailed characterization of pulmonary structures and description of respiratory disease. The introduction of volumetric acquisition allowed increasingly sophisticated analysis of CT data by means of computerized algorithm, namely quantitative CT (QCT). Hundreds of thousands of CTs have been analysed for characterization of focal and diffuse disease of the lung. Several QCT metrics were developed and tested against clinical, functional and prognostic descriptors. Computer-aided detection of nodules, textural analysis of focal lesions, densitometric analysis and airway segmentation in obstructive pulmonary disease and textural analysis in interstitial lung disease are the major chapters of this discipline. The validation of QCT metrics for specific clinical and investigational needs prompted the translation of such metrics from research field to patient care. The present review summarizes the state of the art of QCT in both focal and diffuse lung disease, including a dedicated discussion about application of QCT metrics as parameters for clinical care and outcomes in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Silva
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Gianluca Milanese
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Valeria Seletti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Alarico Ariani
- Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Nicola Sverzellati
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ohkubo M, Narita A, Wada S, Murao K, Matsumoto T. Technical Note: Image filtering to make computer-aided detection robust to image reconstruction kernel choice in lung cancer CT screening. Med Phys 2017; 43:4098. [PMID: 27370129 DOI: 10.1118/1.4953247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In lung cancer computed tomography (CT) screening, the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system depends on the selection of the image reconstruction kernel. To reduce this dependence on reconstruction kernels, the authors propose a novel application of an image filtering method previously proposed by their group. METHODS The proposed filtering process uses the ratio of modulation transfer functions (MTFs) of two reconstruction kernels as a filtering function in the spatial-frequency domain. This method is referred to as MTFratio filtering. Test image data were obtained from CT screening scans of 67 subjects who each had one nodule. Images were reconstructed using two kernels: fSTD (for standard lung imaging) and fSHARP (for sharp edge-enhancement lung imaging). The MTFratio filtering was implemented using the MTFs measured for those kernels and was applied to the reconstructed fSHARP images to obtain images that were similar to the fSTD images. A mean filter and a median filter were applied (separately) for comparison. All reconstructed and filtered images were processed using their prototype CAD system. RESULTS The MTFratio filtered images showed excellent agreement with the fSTD images. The standard deviation for the difference between these images was very small, ∼6.0 Hounsfield units (HU). However, the mean and median filtered images showed larger differences of ∼48.1 and ∼57.9 HU from the fSTD images, respectively. The free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve for the fSHARP images indicated poorer performance compared with the FROC curve for the fSTD images. The FROC curve for the MTFratio filtered images was equivalent to the curve for the fSTD images. However, this similarity was not achieved by using the mean filter or median filter. CONCLUSIONS The accuracy of MTFratio image filtering was verified and the method was demonstrated to be effective for reducing the kernel dependence of CAD performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Ohkubo
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8518, Japan
| | - Akihiro Narita
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8518, Japan
| | - Shinichi Wada
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata 951-8518, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nomura Y, Higaki T, Fujita M, Miki S, Awaya Y, Nakanishi T, Yoshikawa T, Hayashi N, Awai K. Effects of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms on Computer-assisted Detection (CAD) Software for Lung Nodules in Ultra-low-dose CT for Lung Cancer Screening. Acad Radiol 2017; 24:124-130. [PMID: 27986507 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2016] [Revised: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/25/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the effects of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms on computer-assisted detection (CAD) software for lung nodules in ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) for lung cancer screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS We selected 85 subjects who underwent both a low-dose CT (LD-CT) scan and an additional ULD-CT scan in our lung cancer screening program for high-risk populations. The LD-CT scans were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP; LD-FBP). The ULD-CT scans were reconstructed with FBP (ULD-FBP), adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D; ULD-AIDR 3D), and forward projected model-based IR solution (FIRST; ULD-FIRST). CAD software for lung nodules was applied to each image dataset, and the performance of the CAD software was compared among the different IR algorithms. RESULTS The mean volume CT dose indexes were 3.02 mGy (LD-CT) and 0.30 mGy (ULD-CT). For overall nodules, the sensitivities of CAD software at 3.0 false positives per case were 78.7% (LD-FBP), 9.3% (ULD-FBP), 69.4% (ULD-AIDR 3D), and 77.8% (ULD-FIRST). Statistical analysis showed that the sensitivities of ULD-AIDR 3D and ULD-FIRST were significantly higher than that of ULD-FBP (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The performance of CAD software in ULD-CT was improved by using IR algorithms. In particular, the performance of CAD in ULD-FIRST was almost equivalent to that in LD-FBP.
Collapse
|
27
|
Kobayashi H, Ohkubo M, Narita A, Marasinghe JC, Murao K, Matsumoto T, Sone S, Wada S. A method for evaluating the performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in lung cancer CT screening: detection limit for nodule size and density. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20160313. [PMID: 27897029 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We propose the application of virtual nodules to evaluate the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules in cancer screening using low-dose CT. METHODS The virtual nodules were generated based on the spatial resolution measured for a CT system used in an institution providing cancer screening and were fused into clinical lung images obtained at that institution, allowing site specificity. First, we validated virtual nodules as an alternative to artificial nodules inserted into a phantom. In addition, we compared the results of CAD analysis between the real nodules (n = 6) and the corresponding virtual nodules. Subsequently, virtual nodules of various sizes and contrasts between nodule density and background density (ΔCT) were inserted into clinical images (n = 10) and submitted for CAD analysis. RESULTS In the validation study, 46 of 48 virtual nodules had the same CAD results as artificial nodules (kappa coefficient = 0.913). Real nodules and the corresponding virtual nodules showed the same CAD results. The detection limits of the tested CAD system were determined in terms of size and density of peripheral lung nodules; we demonstrated that a nodule with a 5-mm diameter was detected when the nodule had a ΔCT > 220 HU. CONCLUSION Virtual nodules are effective in evaluating CAD performance using site-specific scan/reconstruction conditions. Advances in knowledge: Virtual nodules can be an effective means of evaluating site-specific CAD performance. The methodology for guiding the detection limit for nodule size/density might be a useful evaluation strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajime Kobayashi
- 1 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.,2 Department of Radiology, Sannocho Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Masaki Ohkubo
- 1 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Akihiro Narita
- 1 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Janaka C Marasinghe
- 1 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.,3 Department of Radiography and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
| | | | | | - Shusuke Sone
- 6 JA Nagano Azumi General Hospital, Nagano, Japan.,7 Present Address: Chest Imaging Division, Nagano Health Promotion Corporation, Nagano, Japan
| | - Shinichi Wada
- 1 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Benzakoun J, Bommart S, Coste J, Chassagnon G, Lederlin M, Boussouar S, Revel MP. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of subsolid nodules: Evaluation of a commercial CAD system. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85:1728-1734. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
29
|
Maximum-Intensity-Projection and Computer-Aided-Detection Algorithms as Stand-Alone Reader Devices in Lung Cancer Screening Using Different Dose Levels and Reconstruction Kernels. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207:282-8. [PMID: 27249174 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.15.15588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to evaluate lung nodule detection rates on standard and microdose chest CT with two different computer-aided detection systems (SyngoCT-CAD, VA 20, Siemens Healthcare [CAD1]; Lung CAD, IntelliSpace Portal DX Server, Philips Healthcare [CAD2]) as well as maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) images. We also assessed the impact of different reconstruction kernels. MATERIALS AND METHODS Standard and microdose CT using three reconstruction kernels (i30, i50, i70) was performed with an anthropomorphic chest phantom. We placed 133 ground-glass and 133 solid nodules (diameters of 5 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm) in 55 phantoms. Four blinded readers evaluated the MIP images; one recorded the results of CAD1 and CAD2. Sensitivities for CAD and MIP nodule detection on standard dose and microdose CT were calculated for each reconstruction kernel. RESULTS Dose for microdose CT was significantly less than that for standard-dose CT (0.1323 mSv vs 1.65 mSv; p < 0.0001). CAD1 delivered superior results compared with CAD2 for standard-dose and microdose CT (p < 0.0001). At microdose level, the best stand-alone sensitivity (97.6%) was comparable with CAD1 sensitivity (96.0%; p = 0.36; both with i30 reconstruction kernel). Pooled sensitivities for all nodules, doses, and reconstruction kernels on CAD1 ranged from 88.9% to 97.3% versus 49.6% to 73.9% for CAD2. The best sensitivity was achieved with standard-dose CT, i50 kernel, and CAD1 (97.3%) versus 96% with microdose CT, i30 or i50 kernel, and CAD1. MIP images and CAD1 had similar performance at both dose levels (p = 0.1313 and p = 0.48). CONCLUSION Submillisievert CT is feasible for detecting solid and ground-glass nodules that require soft-tissue kernels for MIP and CAD systems to achieve acceptable sensitivities. MIP reconstructions remain a valuable adjunct to the interpretation of chest CT for increasing sensitivity and have the advantage of significantly lower false-positive rates.
Collapse
|
30
|
Advanced imaging tools in pulmonary nodule detection and surveillance. Clin Imaging 2016; 40:296-301. [PMID: 26916752 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2015] [Revised: 01/27/2016] [Accepted: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. The National Lung Screening Trial has demonstrated that lung cancer screening can reduce lung cancer specific and all cause mortality. With approval of national coverage for lung cancer screening, it is expected that an increase in exams related to pulmonary nodule detection and surveillance will ensue. Advanced imaging technologies for nodule detection and surveillance will be more important than ever. While computed tomography (CT) remains the modality of choice, other emerging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging provides viable alternatives to CT.
Collapse
|
31
|
Huber A, Landau J, Ebner L, Bütikofer Y, Leidolt L, Brela B, May M, Heverhagen J, Christe A. Performance of ultralow-dose CT with iterative reconstruction in lung cancer screening: limiting radiation exposure to the equivalent of conventional chest X-ray imaging. Eur Radiol 2016; 26:3643-52. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4192-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Revised: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
32
|
Abstract
Fundamental to the diagnosis of lung cancer in computed tomography (CT) scans is the detection and interpretation of lung nodules. As the capabilities of CT scanners have advanced, higher levels of spatial resolution reveal tinier lung abnormalities. Not all detected lung nodules should be reported; however, radiologists strive to detect all nodules that might have relevance to cancer diagnosis. Although medium to large lung nodules are detected consistently, interreader agreement and reader sensitivity for lung nodule detection diminish substantially as the nodule size falls below 8 to 10 mm. The difficulty in establishing an absolute reference standard presents a challenge to the reliability of studies performed to evaluate lung nodule detection. In the interest of improving detection performance, investigators are using eye tracking to analyze the effectiveness with which radiologists search CT scans relative to their ability to recognize nodules within their search path in order to determine whether strategies might exist to improve performance across readers. Beyond the viewing of transverse CT reconstructions, image processing techniques such as thin-slab maximum-intensity projections are used to substantially improve reader performance. Finally, the development of computer-aided detection has continued to evolve with the expectation that one day it will serve routinely as a tireless partner to the radiologist to enhance detection performance without significant prolongation of the interpretive process. This review provides an introduction to the current understanding of these varied issues as we enter the era of widespread lung cancer screening.
Collapse
|
33
|
Niesterok C, Piesnack S, Köhler C, Ludewig E, Alef M, Kiefer I. [Computed tomography with computer-assisted detection of pulmonary nodules in dogs and cats]. TIERARZTLICHE PRAXIS. AUSGABE K, KLEINTIERE/HEIMTIERE 2015; 43:381-388. [PMID: 26582331 DOI: 10.15654/tpk-150048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/15/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the potential benefit of computer-assisted detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules in veterinary medicine. Therefore, the CAD rate was compared to the detection rates of two individual examiners in terms of its sensitivity and false-positive findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included 51 dogs and 16 cats with pulmonary nodules previously diagnosed by computed tomography. First, the number of nodules ≥ 3 mm was recorded for each patient by two independent examiners. Subsequently, each examiner used the CAD software for automated nodule detection. With the knowledge of the CAD results, a final consensus decision on the number of nodules was achieved. The software used was a commercially available CAD program. RESULTS The sensitivity of examiner 1 was 89.2%, while that of examiner 2 reached 87.4%. CAD had a sensitivity of 69.4%. With CAD, the sensitivity of examiner 1 increased to 94.7% and that of examiner 2 to 90.8%. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The CAD-system, which we used in our study, had a moderate sensitivity of 69.4%. Despite its severe limitations, with a high level of false-positive and false-negative results, CAD increased the examiners' sensitivity. Therefore, its supportive role in diagnostics appears to be evident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Niesterok
- Christian Niesterok, Klinik für Kleintiere, Veterinärmedizinische Fakultät der Universität Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 23, 04103 Leipzig, E-Mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ridge CA, Yildirim A, Boiselle PM, Franquet T, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Tack D, Gevenois PA, Bankier AA. Differentiating between Subsolid and Solid Pulmonary Nodules at CT: Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement between Experienced Thoracic Radiologists. Radiology 2015; 278:888-96. [PMID: 26458208 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify the reproducibility and accuracy of experienced thoracic radiologists in differentiating between subsolid and solid pulmonary nodules at CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center approved this multicenter study. Six thoracic radiologists, with a mean of 21 years of experience in thoracic radiology (range, 17-22 years), selected images of 10 solid and 10 subsolid nodules to create a database of 120 nodules; this selection served as the reference standard. Each radiologist then interpreted 120 randomly ordered nodules in two different sessions that were separated by a minimum of 3 weeks. The radiologists classified whether or not each nodule was subsolid. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was assessed with a κ statistic. The number of correct classifications was calculated and correlated with nodule size by using Bland-Altman plots. The relationship between disagreement and nodule morphologic characteristics was analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS Interobserver agreement (κ) was 0.619 (range, 0.469-0.745; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.576, 0.663) and 0.670 (range, 0.440-0.839; 95% CI: 0.608, 0.733) for interpretation sessions 1 and 2, respectively. Intraobserver agreement (κ) was 0.792 (95% CI: 0.750, 0.833). Averaged for interpretation sessions, correct classification was achieved by all radiologists for 58% (70 of 120) of nodules. Radiologists agreed with their initial determination (the reference standard) in 77% of cases (range, 45%-100%). Nodule size weakly correlated with correct classification (long axis: Spearman rank correlation coefficient, rs = 0.161 and P = .049; short axis: rs = 0.128 and P = .163). CONCLUSION The reproducibility and accuracy of thoracic radiologists in classifying whether or not a nodule is subsolid varied in the retrospective study. This inconsistency may affect surveillance recommendations and prognostic determinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole A Ridge
- From the Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland (C.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Gevher Nesibe Hospital, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey (A.Y.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.M.B., A.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain (T.F.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Epicura Hospital, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium (D.T.); and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.)
| | - Afra Yildirim
- From the Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland (C.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Gevher Nesibe Hospital, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey (A.Y.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.M.B., A.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain (T.F.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Epicura Hospital, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium (D.T.); and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.)
| | - Phillip M Boiselle
- From the Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland (C.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Gevher Nesibe Hospital, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey (A.Y.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.M.B., A.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain (T.F.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Epicura Hospital, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium (D.T.); and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.)
| | - Tomas Franquet
- From the Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland (C.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Gevher Nesibe Hospital, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey (A.Y.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.M.B., A.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain (T.F.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Epicura Hospital, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium (D.T.); and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.)
| | - Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop
- From the Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland (C.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Gevher Nesibe Hospital, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey (A.Y.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.M.B., A.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain (T.F.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Epicura Hospital, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium (D.T.); and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.)
| | - Denis Tack
- From the Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland (C.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Gevher Nesibe Hospital, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey (A.Y.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.M.B., A.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain (T.F.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Epicura Hospital, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium (D.T.); and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.)
| | - Pierre Alain Gevenois
- From the Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland (C.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Gevher Nesibe Hospital, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey (A.Y.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.M.B., A.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain (T.F.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Epicura Hospital, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium (D.T.); and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.)
| | - Alexander A Bankier
- From the Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland (C.A.R.); Department of Radiology, Gevher Nesibe Hospital, University of Erciyes, Kayseri, Turkey (A.Y.); Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (P.M.B., A.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain (T.F.); Department of Radiology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum St. Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (C.M.S.P.); Department of Radiology, Epicura Hospital, Clinique Louis Caty, Baudour, Belgium (D.T.); and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium (P.A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
The development of widespread lung cancer screening programs has the potential to dramatically increase the number of thoracic computed tomography (CT) examinations performed annually in the United States, resulting in a greater number of newly detected, indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). Additional imaging studies, such as fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET), have been shown to provide valuable information in the assessment of indeterminate SPNs. Newer technologies, such as contrast-enhanced dual-energy chest CT and FDG-PET/CT, also have the potential to facilitate diagnosis of potentially malignant SPNs.
Collapse
|
36
|
Rubin GD. Computed tomography: revolutionizing the practice of medicine for 40 years. Radiology 2015; 273:S45-74. [PMID: 25340438 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14141356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) has had a profound effect on the practice of medicine. Both the spectrum of clinical applications and the role that CT has played in enhancing the depth of our understanding of disease have been profound. Although almost 90 000 articles on CT have been published in peer-reviewed journals over the past 40 years, fewer than 5% of these have been published in Radiology. Nevertheless, these almost 4000 articles have provided a basis for many important medical advances. By enabling a deepened understanding of anatomy, physiology, and pathology, CT has facilitated key advances in the detection and management of disease. This article celebrates this breadth of scientific discovery and development by examining the impact that CT has had on the diagnosis, characterization, and management of a sampling of major health challenges, including stroke, vascular diseases, cancer, trauma, acute abdominal pain, and diffuse lung diseases, as related to key technical advances in CT and manifested in Radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey D Rubin
- From the Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, PO Box 17969, 2400 Pratt St, Durham, NC 27715
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Iwasawa T, Matsumoto S, Aoki T, Okada F, Nishimura Y, Yamagata H, Ohno Y. A comparison of axial versus coronal image viewing in computer-aided detection of lung nodules on CT. Jpn J Radiol 2014; 33:76-83. [PMID: 25533196 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-014-0383-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2014] [Accepted: 12/03/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare primarily viewing axial images (Axial mode) versus coronal reconstruction images (Coronal mode) in computer-aided detection (CAD) of lung nodules on multidetector computed tomography (CT) in terms of detection performance and reading time. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty CT data sets from two institutions were collected prospectively. Ten observers (6 radiologists, 4 pulmonologists) with varying degrees of experience interpreted the data sets using CAD as a second reader (performing nodule detection first without then with aid). The data sets were interpreted twice, once each for Axial and Coronal modes, in two sessions held 4 weeks apart. Jackknife free-response receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to compare detection performances in the two modes. RESULTS Mean figure-of-merit values with and without aid were 0.717 and 0.684 in Axial mode and 0.702 and 0.671 in Coronal mode; use of CAD significantly increased the performance of observers in both modes (P < 0.01). Mean reading times for radiologists did not significantly differ between Axial (156 ± 74 s) and Coronal mode (164 ± 69 s; P = 0.08). Mean reading times for pulmonologists were significantly lower in Coronal (112 ± 53 s) than in Axial mode (130 ± 80 s; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION There was no statistically significant difference between Axial and Coronal modes for lung nodule detection with CAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Iwasawa
- Department of Radiology, Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, 6-16-1, Tomiokahigashi, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0051, Japan,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Truong MT, Ko JP, Rossi SE, Rossi I, Viswanathan C, Bruzzi JF, Marom EM, Erasmus JJ. Update in the Evaluation of the Solitary Pulmonary Nodule. Radiographics 2014; 34:1658-79. [DOI: 10.1148/rg.346130092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
39
|
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up evaluation of patients with lung cancer. With recent advances in technology, it is important to update and standardize the radiological practices in lung cancer evaluation. In this article, the authors review the main clinical applications of different imaging modalities and the most common radiological presentations of lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shekhar S Patil
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1478, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Myrna C B Godoy
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1478, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - James I L Sorensen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1478, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Edith M Marom
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1478, Houston, Texas 77030.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Godoy MCB, Truong MT, Sabloff B, Naidich DP. Subsolid pulmonary nodule management and lung adenocarcinoma classification: state of the art and future trends. Semin Roentgenol 2014; 48:295-307. [PMID: 24034262 DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2013.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Myrna C B Godoy
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Houston, TX.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Field JK, Hansell DM, Duffy SW, Baldwin DR. CT screening for lung cancer: countdown to implementation. Lancet Oncol 2014; 14:e591-600. [PMID: 24275132 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70293-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Implementation of lung cancer CT screening is currently the subject of a major policy decision within the USA. Findings of the US National Lung Screening Trial showed a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality and a 6·7% decrease in all-cause mortality; subsequently, five US professional and clinical organisations and the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended that screening should be implemented. Should national health services in Europe follow suit? The European community awaits mortality and cost-effectiveness data from the NELSON trial in 2015-16 and pooled findings of European trials. In the intervening years, a recommendation is proposed that a demonstration trial is done in the UK. In this Review, we summarise the existing evidence and identify questions that remain to be answered before the implementation of international lung cancer screening programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K Field
- Roy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme, University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre, Liverpool, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Frauenfelder T, Puhan M, Lazor R, von Garnier C, Bremerich J, Niemann T, Christe A, Montet X, Gautschi O, Weder W, Kohler M. Early Detection of Lung Cancer: A Statement from an Expert Panel of the Swiss University Hospitals on Lung Cancer Screening. Respiration 2014; 87:254-64. [DOI: 10.1159/000357049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2013] [Accepted: 10/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
43
|
Christe A, Leidolt L, Huber A, Steiger P, Szucs-Farkas Z, Roos J, Heverhagen J, Ebner L. Lung cancer screening with CT: Evaluation of radiologists and different computer assisted detection software (CAD) as first and second readers for lung nodule detection at different dose levels. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:e873-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2013] [Revised: 07/12/2013] [Accepted: 08/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
44
|
Galvin JR, Franks TJ. Lung cancer diagnosis: radiologic imaging, histology, and genetics. Radiology 2013; 268:9-11. [PMID: 23793588 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13130558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey R Galvin
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, UMH N2W78, 655 W Baltimore St, Baltimore, MD 2120, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|