Low back pain with axillary mass in a perimenopausal woman: A case of schwannomatosis mimicking metastasis

Schwannomatosis is a rare neurocutaneous syndrome characterized by the presence of multiple schwannomas along the peripheral nerves, distinctly excluding the vestibular nerves. It is recognized as the third principal form of neurofibromatosis, alongside neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2. In this report, we discuss the case of a 45-year-old woman who initially sought medical attention for low back pain and swelling in her left axilla. Her magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple enhancing intradural extramedullary lesions, along with a mass in the right upper thoracic region and another in the left axilla, raising suspicions of metastasis. However, a comprehensive analysis that aligned imaging results with histopathological findings confirmed the diagnosis of schwannomatosis. This case highlights the importance of differentiating between various conditions that can cause multiple intradural extramedullary masses, such as nerve sheath tumors, meningiomas, and metastasis. The presence of multiple schwannomas suggests a diagnosis of either neurofibromatosis type 2 or schwannomatosis, making the distinction between these two conditions critical for appropriate management.

A rare case of schwannomatosis with meningioma: a case report

Introduction

Schwannomatosis is characterized by multiple schwannomas without vestibular schwannomas or any other stigmata of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Schwannomatosis is a rare disorder, with a reported incidence ranging from 1 in 40 000 to 1 in 1.7 million. Meningioma is also associated with schwannomatosis in around 5% of cases.

Case presentation

We describe a case of a 20-year-old female presenting with progressive weakness of the right lower limb for 7 months with a tingling sensation and numbness of the same limb for 6 months and was found to have schwannomatosis with multiple spinal and right cerebellopontine angle (CPA) (9th/10th cranial nerve) schwannomas and left anterior cranial fossa meningioma.

Discussion

Schwannomas in schwannomatosis are seen along the cranial, spinal, and peripheral nerves but not along the vestibular nerve, as is characteristically seen in NF2. The occurrence of meningiomas is about 5% in individuals with schwannomatosis, and the patient in our case also had an associated meningioma. The tumor was confirmed to be a schwannoma based on features on an MRI examination and histological examination.

Conclusion

It is of great significance to identify the entire spectrum of the disease in a patient with schwannomatosis, and to differentiate it from related conditions in order to track and surgically manage the patient appropriately based on symptomatology and imaging findings.

Is vestibular schwannoma really a benign tumor? Case report and review

Introduction

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a benign tumor that develops from Schwann cells of the eighth cranial pair, mainly in the cerebellopontine angle.

Case Presentation

We report the case of a 30-year-old female patient who developed left otalgia associated with neglected tinnitus, the evolution of which was marked by the development of a static cerebellar syndrome and a behavioral disorder, whose brain MRI revealed a locally advanced process in the cerebellopontine angle at the expense of the vestibulocochlear nerve, in favor of a VS, complicated by involvement of the tonsils, which unfortunately led to the patient's death.

Discussion

VS, formerly known as acoustic neuroma, is an extra-axial intracranial tumor that accounts for over 80% of pontocerebellar angle tumors, and is secondary in the majority of cases to inactivation of the neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) tumor suppressor gene, either by mutation of the NF2 gene or loss of chromosome 22q. In the majority of cases, it is unilateral and solitary, but in almost 8% of cases, it is associated with NF2. Cerebral MRI is the examination of choice for the detection, characterization, and diagnosis of VS without the need for biopsy, mainly with T1-weighted sequences before and after gadolinium injection. Treatment is based essentially on surgery or radiosurgery, depending on the size, impact, and expertise of the treatment team.

Conclusion

VS remains an important intracranial tumor entity, which can be life-threatening in cases of advanced local invasion.

Whole Body MRI with DWI in People with NF1 and Schwannomatosis: Are Qualitative and Quantitative Imaging Features of Peripheral Lesions Comparable to Localized MRI?

PURPOSE

To compare the qualitative and quantitative features of peripheral lesions on localized (L) and whole-body (WB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and schwannomatosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, HIPAA compliant study with twenty-seven patients (14 women, 13 men; mean age (years): 38 (3-67)) who underwent both L-MRI and WB-MRI without interval treatment. WB-MRI and L-MRI were comprised of T1-weighted, fat suppressed (FS) T2-weighted or short tau inversion recovery (STIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using b-values of 50, 400, and 800 s/mm2, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping and pre- and post-contrast FST1 sequences. Two readers recorded qualitative (T1 and T2/STIR signal intensity and heterogeneity, contrast enhancement and heterogeneity, perilesional enhancement, presence of a target sign and perilesional edema) and quantitative (size, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), ADC) features of peripheral lesions on L-MRI and WB-MRI.Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar's test were used.

RESULTS

There were 31 peripheral lesions identified in 27 subjects, (mean size: 3.1 cm (range: 1-8.1 cm) on both L-MRI and WB-MRI).There were no differences in T1 signal and heterogeneity and T2/STIR signal and heterogeneity between WB-MRI and L-MRI ((p = 0.180, 0.083, 0.317 and 0.157 respectively). There were also no differences in contrast enhancement, heterogeneity and perilesional enhancement between WB-MRI and L-MRI (p = 1.000, 0.380 and 1.000 respectively). Presence of a target sign and perilesional edema did not differ between WB-MRI and L-MRI (p = 1.000 and 0.500 respectively). Craniocaudal (CC), mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) size measurements on WB-MRI did not differ from CC, ML and AP size measurements on L-MRI (p = 0.597, 0.128 and 0.783 respectively). SNR on WB-DWI did not differ from SNR on L-DWI for b50, b400 and b800 images (p = 0.285, 0.166, and 0.974 respectively), and CNR on WB-DWI did not differ from CNR on L-DWI for b50, b400 and b800 images (p = 0.600, 0.124, and 0.787 respectively). There was no significant difference in minimum, mean and maximum ADC values between WB-DWI and L-DWI (p = 0.234, 0.481, and 0.441 respectively). Median minimum, mean and maximum ADC (×10(-3)mm(2)/s) differences between WB-DWI and L-DWI were 0.0 (range -1 to 0.7), 0.0 (range -0.5 to 0.6), and 0.1 (range -1.2 to 0.8) respectively. Relative ADC difference averages were 29.1% for minimum values, 10.1% for mean values, and 14.8% for maximum values.

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI yields qualitative and quantitative features for peripheral lesions, including DWI and ADC measurements, that are comparable to L-MRI scans. WB-DWI can be reliably used for the assessment of peripheral nerve sheath tumors, obviating the need for a repeat follow-up L-DWI acquisition.

Understanding barriers to diagnosis in a rare, genetic disease: Delays and errors in diagnosing schwannomatosis

Diagnosis of rare, genetic diseases is challenging, but conceptual frameworks of the diagnostic process can guide quality improvement initiatives. Using the National Academy of Medicine diagnostic framework, we assessed the extent of, and reasons for diagnostic delays and diagnostic errors in schwannomatosis, a neurogenetic syndrome characterized by nerve sheath tumors and chronic pain. We reviewed the medical records of 97 people with confirmed or probable schwannomatosis seen in two US tertiary care clinics. Time-to-event analysis revealed a median time from first symptom to diagnosis of 16.7 years (95% CI, 7.5-26.0 years) and median time from first medical consultation to diagnosis of 9.8 years (95% CI, 3.5-16.2 years). Factors associated with longer times to diagnosis included initial signs/symptoms that were intermittent, non-specific, or occurred at younger ages (p < 0.05). Thirty-six percent of patients were misdiagnosed; misdiagnoses were of underlying genetic condition (18.6%), pain etiology (16.5%), and nerve sheath tumor presence/pathology (11.3%) (non-mutually exclusive categories). One-fifth (19.6%) of patients had a clear missed opportunity for genetics workup that could have led to an earlier schwannomatosis diagnosis. These results suggest that interventions in clinician education, genetic testing availability, expert review of pathology findings, and automatic triggers for genetics referrals may improve diagnosis of schwannomatosis.

The 100 Most Highly Cited Publications on Hearing Preservation for Vestibular Schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

Vestibular schwannomas are benign, slow-growing tumors that often reduce patient quality of life by compressing nearby nerves. Neurological function preservation is one of the indicators of treatment success, with hearing preservation being the most difficult to obtain. This paper provides a bibliometric analysis of hearing preservation in treating acoustic neuromas and a greater understanding of the most highly cited articles, which have enhanced our understanding of this topic.

METHODS

Key terms of "acoustic neuroma," "vestibular schwannoma," and "hearing preservation" were queried through Web of Science. Articles were sorted by citation frequency, and the top 100 articles were recorded for title, name of first author, journal title, year of publication, total number of citations (and associated rank), average number of citations per year, country of the first author's associated institution, and type of study.

RESULTS

The top 100 cited articles were published from 1980 to 2014. The United States had the highest involvement as a country (55%), the University of Pittsburgh as an institution (13%), and The Journal of Neurosurgery as a publishing source (27%). Fourteen were reviews, and 86 were clinical papers. Of the 86, 73 were retrospective studies.

CONCLUSION

Bibliometric analyses summarize and assess potential areas of strength and knowledge gaps within the literature. Studies on hearing preservation in vestibular schwannomas mostly consist of retrospective reviews that assess postoperative outcomes of microsurgery and radiosurgery. Prospective studies and novel treatment options for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannomas are needed to increase current literature diversity.

Laminectomy triggers symptomatic growth of spinal schwannoma in a patient with schwannomatosis

Background:

Schwannomatosis (SWN) is genetically similar to neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and represents a NF2 gene mutation. Previous studies have shown that these mutations in both neurons and Schwann cells can lead to the development of schwannomas after nerve crush injuries. Here, we reviewed the potential pathoanatomical mechanisms for the development of a trauma-induced spinal schwannomas in a 55-year-old male with SWN.

Case Description:

A 49-year-old male had originally undergone a L3–L5 lumbar laminectomy for stenosis; the schwannomas seen on the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were not resected. Now at age 55, he newly presented with low back pain and numbness in the left L5 dermatome, and he was diagnosed with an L4 vertebral level cauda equina tumor on MRI. Following gross-total resection, the histopathological assessment revealed a Ki-67 labeling index 5–10% in hotspots (i.e., slightly higher than the normal range of schwannomas) and a 20% mosaic loss of SMARCB1. Based on these criteria, he was diagnosed as having SWN.

Conclusion:

In this patient with SWN, compression/physical trauma to nerves of the cauda equina during the L3–L5 laminectomy 6 years ago likely caused the progression of schwannoma.

WP1066 induces cell death in a schwannomatosis patient-derived schwannoma cell line

Schwannomatosis is a rare genetic disorder that predisposes individuals to development of multiple schwannomas mainly in spinal and peripheral nerves and to debilitating chronic pain often unrelated to any schwannoma. Pathogenic variants of two genes, SMARCB1 and LZTR1, are causal in familial cases. However, many schwannomatosis patients lack mutations in these genes. Surgery is the standard treatment for schwannomas but leaves patients with increasing neurological deficits. Pain management is a daily struggle controlled by the use of multiple analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs. There is a need for both nonsurgical treatment to manage tumor growth and nonaddictive, nonsedative pain control. Because standard clinical trials are exceedingly difficult for patients with rare disorders, precision medicine approaches offer the possibility of bespoke therapeutic regimens to control tumor growth. As a proof of principle, we obtained a bio-specimen of paraspinal schwannoma from a schwannomatosis patient with a germline point mutation in the SMARCB1/INI gene. We created an hTERT immortalized cell line and tested the ability of targeted small molecules with efficacy in neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomas to reduce cell viability and induce cell death. We identified WP1066, a STAT3 inhibitor, currently in phase 2 clinical trials for pediatric and adult brain tumors as a lead compound. It reduced cell viability and STAT-3 phosphorylation and induced expression of markers for both necroptosis and caspase-dependent cell death. The results demonstrate feasibility in creating patient-derived cell lines for use in precision medicine studies.

Neurofibromatosis in Children: Actually and Perspectives

The three types of neurofibromatosis, namely type 1, type 2, and schwannomatosis, are generally associated with various benign tumors affecting the skin and the nervous system. On rare occasions, especially in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), malignant neoplasms may also be present, several of them possessing a more aggressive course than in individuals without this syndrome. As such, a clear delineation between the three variants of neurofibromatosis is crucial to establish the correct diagnosis and management, as well as predict the neoplasm-related outcomes. Neurofibromin, the principal product of the NF1 gene, is a potent inhibitor of cellular proliferation, having been linked to several key signaling pathways involved in tumor growth. Therefore, it may provide a useful therapeutic target for tumor management in these patients. In this article, we want to present the association between deficiency of neurofibromin and the consequences of the lack of this protein leading to different kinds of malignant tumors. The therapy is still uncertain and most therapeutic options are in development or clinical trials.

The Forgotten Phacomatoses: A Neuroimaging Review of Rare Neurocutaneous Disorders

Phakomatoses, or neurocutaneous syndromes, are a heterogeneous group of rare genetic disorders that predominantly affect structures arising from the embryonic ectoderm, namely the skin, eye globe, retina, tooth enamel, and central nervous system. Other organs are also involved in some syndromes, mainly cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and musculoskeletal systems. Currently, more than sixty distinct entities belonging to this category have been described in the literature. Common phakomatoses include conditions like Neurofibromatosis and Tuberous sclerosis. Several review papers have focused on various aspects of these common conditions, including clinical presentation, genetic and molecular basis, and neuroimaging features. In this review, we focus on rare neurocutaneous syndromes: Melanophakomatoses (Ie, Neurocutaneous Melanosis, and Incontinentia Pigmenti), Vascular Phakomatoses (Ie, Ataxia Telangiectasia and PHACE Syndrome), and other conditions such as Cowden Syndrome, Basal Nevus Syndrome, Schwannomatosis, Progressive Facial Hemiatrophy, Gomez-Lopez-Hernandez Syndrome, Wyburn-Mason Syndrome, CHILD Syndrome, and Proteus Syndrome. We also review the neuroradiologic manifestations of these conditions as a guide for neurologists and neuroradiologists in their daily practice.

Evaluating the Clinical Utility and Cost of Imaging Strategies in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Primary Intradural Spinal Tumors

OBJECTIVE

In patients with new primary intradural spinal tumors, the best screening strategy for additional central nervous system (CNS) lesions is unclear. The goal of this study was to document the rate of additional CNS tumors in these patients.

METHODS

Adults with primary intradural spinal tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging strategy at diagnosis was classified as focused spine (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar), total spine, or complete neuraxis (brain and total spine). Tumor pathology, genetic syndromes, and presence of additional CNS lesions at diagnosis or follow-up were collected.

RESULTS

The study comprised 319 patients with mean age of 51 years and mean follow-up of 41 months. In 151 patients with focused spine imaging, 3 (2.0%) were found to have new lesions with 2 (1.4%) requiring treatment. In 35 patients with total spine imaging, there were no additional lesions. In 133 patients with complete neuraxis imaging, 4 (3.0%) were found to have new lesions with 2 (1.5%) requiring treatment. There was no difference in the identification of new lesions (P = 0.542) or new lesions requiring treatment (P = 0.772) across imaging strategies. Among patients without genetic syndromes, rates of new lesions requiring treatment were 1.4% for focused spine, 0% for total spine, and 2.2% for complete neuraxis (P = 0.683). There were no cases of delayed identification causing risk to life or neurological function. Complete neuraxis imaging carried an increased charge of $4420 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients without an underlying genetic syndrome, the likelihood of identifying additional CNS lesions requiring treatment is low. In appropriate cases, focused spine imaging may be a more cost-effective strategy.

A ventral midline primary schwannoma of the cervical spinal cord: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Intradural schwannomas can occur at any level of the spine. According to the literature, approximately 8% of intradural schwannomas occur in the atlantoaxial spine, and these tumors are usually located in the posterolateral or lateral spinal cord. In contrast, tumors in the ventral midline of the spinal cord are relatively rare.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 47-year-old female presented with progressively worsening neck pain and paresthesias in both upper and lower limbs for the past 5 years.

DIAGNOSIS

Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and histopathological findings, she was diagnosed with ventral midline primary schwannoma of the cervical spinal cord.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient was treated with surgical resection.

OUTCOMES

Follow-up visit at 2 years after the surgery showed that the patient is neurologically intact and free of disease.

CONLUSION

In summary, for the tumors in the ventral midline of the atlantoaxial spinal cord, the preferred treatment is complete surgical resection by the posterior approach compared to the anterior approach, which often improves clinical symptoms or achieves a healing effect.

A Linear Variant of Segmental Schwannomatosis Localized to the Upper Extremity

Introduction Schwannomas represent benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Their phenotypic presentations in schwannomatosis and segmental schwannomatosis have been well described. To date, however, cases of schwannomatosis or multiple schwannomas localized to a single nerve fascicle have been limited in the literature.

Case Presentation In this study, we identify a case of a 48 year-old non-neurofibromatosis male who presented with symptomatic schwannomas localized to a single nerve fascicle of the upper extremity. Intraoperative exploration revealed four schwannomas arising from a 15-cm segment of ulnar nerve fascicle. Surgical excision was successful, without neurological deficit or recurrence.

Conclusion This study identifies a case of schwannomatosis localized to a single nerve fascicle that may represent a linear variant of segmental schwannomatosis. The presentation may represent a temporary linear appearance in progression to “nonlinear” segmental variant; however, a molecularly distinct subset of schwannomas cannot be excluded.

The Neurofibromatoses

BACKGROUND

Neurofibromatosis of types 1 and 2 (NF1, NF2) and schwannomatosis are the diseases that make up the neurofibromatosis spectrum. With respective incidences of 1 in 3000, 1 in 33 000, and 1 in 60 000 births, they form part of the group of rare tumor-suppressor syndromes. They give rise to a greater tumor burden for the nervous system than any other type of neoplastic disease. New approaches to symptomatic treatment are emerging.

METHODS

This review is based on articles retrieved by a selective literature search on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of the neurofibromatoses.

RESULTS

NF1 and NF2 are monogenic diseases, while the genetics of schwannomatosis is complex. The three entities are clinically and pathophysiologically distinct. An important aspect of their tumor biology is the alternation of growth phases and growth pauses. Correlations between genotypes and phenotypes are variable, while new mutations and genetic mosaics are common. Ninety-nine percent of patients with NF1 have six or more café-au-lait spots by the age of 12 months; 90-95% of patients with NF2 develop bilateral vestibular schwannomas. In schwannomatosis, pain is the most prominent symptom; two-thirds of those affected develop spinal schwannomas. The severity and prognosis of these disorders are not closely correlated with the radiological findings; rather, neurologic deficits, malignant transformation, and psychosocial stress are of greater clinical importance. Advances in knowledge of pathophysiology have led to the development of targeted treatment approaches. Examples include the off-label treatment of vestibular schwannomas with bevacizumab and of plexiform neurofibromas with MEK inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Patients with neurofibromatoses need individualized care. They should be treated in centers of expertise where interdisciplinary consultation is available and new types of pharmacotherapy can be provided.

Intravascular schwannoma: A review of a rare diagnosis

While schwannoma is one of the most common types of benign peripheral nerve tumors in adults, a very unique and specific variant of schwannoma, the intravascular variant, is exceedingly rare. There have only been three previously published cases of intravascular schwannomas. Here we describe a fourth case of an intravascular schwannoma in a 47-year-old man with an enlarging subcutaneous nodule on his posterior calf. This is the second case of an intravascular schwannoma contained within a vein. Also included is an overview of intravascular schwannomas, including a description and discussion of the histopathological diagnosis, differential diagnoses, and schwannoma variants.

Recurrent Schwannomatosis of the Hand

Background: Peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) are neoplastic soft tissue masses generated from the abnormal proliferation of Schwann cells. Often, these tumors occur in isolation and are known as schwannomas or neurilemmomas. The presence of multiple schwannomas is known as schwannomatosis. The purpose of this article is 2-fold: (1) to review the relevant literature and describe a unique case of this rare condition; and (2) to emphasize salient clinical considerations in the diagnosis and treatment of schwannomatosis. Methods: In this report, we describe the case of a 52-year-old white man who presented with multiple recurrent soft tissue masses of the right hand. On initial presentation, he described pain across his right hand and index finger, which persisted despite numerous prior operations. The index finger had a flexion contracture around the location of the proximal interphalangeal joint, and there were multiple tender masses along the length of the finger and palm. Results: Segmental excision of the affected radial digital nerve was performed. A pulp flap based on contralateral neurovascular bundle resulted in a sensate, pain-free digit. Tissue pathology confirmed the diagnosis of multiple neurilemmomas. Conclusions: We report the success of a radial digital neurectomy in a patient with widespread neurilemmomas, who had previously excluded that painful digit from use. It was through careful consideration of the preoperative differential diagnosis, by valuing the preoperative imaging, and by considering all surgical options with specific attention paid to skin flap design that this good outcome of a fully sensate, pain-free, mobile index finger was achieved.

An update on the CNS manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 2

Neurofibromatosis type II (NF2) is a tumor predisposition syndrome characterized by the development of distinctive nervous system lesions. NF2 results from loss-of-function alterations in the NF2 gene on chromosome 22, with resultant dysfunction of its protein product merlin. NF2 is most commonly associated with the development of bilateral vestibular schwannomas; however, patients also have a predisposition to development of other tumors including meningiomas, ependymomas, and peripheral, spinal, and cranial nerve schwannomas. Patients may also develop other characteristic manifestations such as ocular lesions, neuropathies, meningioangiomatosis, and glial hamartia. NF2 has a highly variable clinical course, with some patients exhibiting a severe phenotype and development of multiple tumors at an early age, while others may be nearly asymptomatic throughout their lifetime. Despite the high morbidity associated with NF2 in severe cases, management of NF2-associated lesions primarily consists of surgical resection and treatment of symptoms, and there are currently no FDA-approved systemic therapies that address the underlying biology of the syndrome. Refinements to the diagnostic criteria of NF2 have been proposed over time due to increasing understanding of clinical and molecular data. Large-population studies have demonstrated that some features such as the development of gliomas and neurofibromas, currently included as diagnostic criteria, may require further clarification and modification. Meanwhile, burgeoning insights into the molecular biology of NF2 have shed light on the etiology and highly variable severity of the disease and suggested numerous putative molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Here, we review the clinicopathologic features of NF2, current understanding of the molecular biology of NF2, particularly with regard to central nervous system lesions, ongoing therapeutic studies, and avenues for further research.

The Role of Merlin/NF2 Loss in Meningioma Biology

Mutations in the neurofibromin 2 (NF2) gene were among the first genetic alterations implicated in meningioma tumorigenesis, based on analysis of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients who not only develop vestibular schwannomas but later have a high incidence of meningiomas. The NF2 gene product, merlin, is a tumor suppressor that is thought to link the actin cytoskeleton with plasma membrane proteins and mediate contact-dependent inhibition of proliferation. However, the early recognition of the crucial role of NF2 mutations in the pathogenesis of the majority of meningiomas has not yet translated into useful clinical insights, due to the complexity of merlin's many interacting partners and signaling pathways. Next-generation sequencing studies and increasingly sophisticated NF2-deletion-based in vitro and in vivo models have helped elucidate the consequences of merlin loss in meningioma pathogenesis. In this review, we seek to summarize recent findings and provide future directions toward potential therapeutics for this tumor.

Intraosseous schwannoma of the mandible and schwannoma of the spinal cord: A rare presentation of schwannomatosis – Case report and review of the literature

Schwannomatosis is a recently recognized distinct form of neurofibromatosis (NF). It is a rare condition, the incidence of which varies between 1/400,000 and 1/1.7 million. An important feature of schwannomatosis is the presence of multiple intracranial, spinal, and peripheral schwannomas in the absence of acoustic neuromas. Schwannomatosis presenting with intraosseous schwannoma of the mandible is even rarer, and only a few cases have been reported. It usually affects individuals in the third to fifth decade of life. Usually, it is sporadic in origin, but in 20% of patients, it can be familial. As a diagnostic criterion, NF2 gene is not involved in schwannomatosis. We report a case of a 48-year-old male presenting with facial pain and difficulty in chewing, and subsequent development of spastic paraplegia. Magnetic resonance imaging scan of head and neck revealed mass lesion involving infratemporal region on the left side, intraosseous lesion of the mandible, and multiple mass lesions in the neck. Acoustic nerves were not involved. Mutagen-induced chromosome sensitivity analysis test suggested no predisposition for malignancy. His clinical features are suggestive of schwannomatosis, which is a recently recognized distinct form of NF.

Schwannomatosis: a genetic and epidemiological study

OBJECTIVES

Schwannomatosis is a dominantly inherited condition predisposing to schwannomas of mainly spinal and peripheral nerves with some diagnostic overlap with neurofibromatosis-2 (NF2), but the underlying epidemiology is poorly understood. We present the birth incidence and prevalence allowing for overlap with NF2.

METHODS

Schwannomatosis and NF2 cases were ascertained from the Manchester region of England (population=4.8 million) and from across the UK. Point prevalence and birth incidence were calculated from regional birth statistics. Genetic analysis was also performed on NF2, LZTR1 and SMARCB1 on blood and tumour DNA samples when available.

RESULTS

Regional prevalence for schwannomatosis and NF2 were 1 in 126 315 and 50 500, respectively, with calculated birth incidences of 1 in 68 956 and 1 in 27 956. Mosaic NF2 causes a substantial overlap with schwannomatosis resulting in the misdiagnosis of at least 9% of schwannomatosis cases. LZTR1-associated schwannomatosis also causes a small number of cases that are misdiagnosed with NF2 (1%-2%), due to the occurrence of a unilateral vestibular schwannoma. Patients with schwannomatosis had lower numbers of non-vestibular cranial schwannomas, but more peripheral and spinal nerve schwannomas with pain as a predominant presenting symptom. Life expectancy was significantly better in schwannomatosis (mean age at death 76.9) compared with NF2 (mean age at death 66.2; p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the highly ascertained North-West England population, schwannomatosis has less than half the birth incidence and prevalence of NF2.

Co-occurrence of schwannomatosis and rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome 1

BACKGROUND

The clinical phenotype associated with germline SMARCB1 mutations has as yet not been fully documented. It is known that germline SMARCB1 mutations may cause rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS1) or schwannomatosis. However, the co-occurrence of rhabdoid tumor and schwannomas in the same patient has not so far been reported.

METHODS

We investigated a family with members harboring a germline SMARCB1 deletion by means of whole-body MRI as well as high-resolution microstructural magnetic resonance neurography (MRN). Breakpoint-spanning PCRs were performed to characterize the SMARCB1 deletion and its segregation in the family.

RESULTS

The index patient of this family was in complete continuous remission for an atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) treated at the age of 2 years. However, at the age of 21 years, she exhibited paraparesis of her legs and MRI investigations revealed multiple intrathoracic and spinal schwannomas. Breakpoint-spanning PCRs indicated that the germline deletion segregating in the family encompasses 6.4-kb and includes parts of SMARCB1 intron 7, exons 8-9 and 3.3-kb located telomeric to exon 9 including the SMARCB1 3' UTR. The analysis of sequences at the deletion breakpoints showed that the deletion has been caused by replication errors including template-switching. The patient had inherited the deletion from her 56-year-old healthy mother who did not exhibit schwannomas or other tumors as determined by whole-body MRI. However, MRN of the peripheral nerves of the mother's extremities revealed multiple fascicular microlesions which have been previously identified as indicative of schwannomatosis-associated subclinical peripheral nerve pathology.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of schwannomatosis-associated clinical symptoms independent of the AT/RT as the primary disease should be considered in long-term survivors of AT/RT. Furthermore, our investigations indicate that germline SMARCB1 mutation carriers not presenting RTs or schwannomatosis-associated clinical symptoms may nevertheless exhibit peripheral nerve pathology as revealed by MRN.

The efficacy of lapatinib and nilotinib in combination with radiation therapy in a model of NF2 associated peripheral schwannoma

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), a neurogenetic condition manifest by peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNST) throughout the neuroaxis for which there are no approved therapies. In vitro and in vivo studies presented here examine agents targeting signaling pathways, angiogenesis, and DNA repair mechanisms. In vitro dose response assays demonstrated potent activity of lapatinib and nilotinib against the mouse schwannoma SC4 (Nf2 ^-/-) cell line. We then examined the efficacy of everolimus, nilotinib, lapatinib, bevacizumab and radiation (RT) as mono- and combination therapies in flank and sciatic nerve in vivo NF2-PNST models. Data were analyzed using generalized linear models, two sample T-tests and paired T-tests, and linear regression models. SC4(Nf2 ^-/-) cells implanted in the flank or sciatic nerve showed similar rates of growth (p = 0.9748). Lapatinib, nilotinib and RT significantly reduced tumor growth rate versus controls in the in vivo flank model (p = 0.0025, 0.0062, and 0.009, respectively) whereas bevacizumab and everolimus did not. The best performers were tested in the in vivo sciatic nerve model of NF2 associated PNST, where chemoradiation outperformed nilotinib or lapatinib as single agents (nilotinib vs. nilotinib + RT, p = 0.0001; lapatinib versus lapatinib + RT, p < 0.0001) with no observed toxicity. There was no re-growth of tumors even 14 days after treatment was stopped. The combination of either lapatinib or nilotinib with RT resulted in greater delays in tumor growth rate than any modality alone. This data suggest that concurrent low dose RT and targeted therapy may have a role in addressing progressive PNST in patients with NF2.

CNS Tumors in Neurofibromatosis

Neurofibromatosis (NF) encompasses a group of distinct genetic disorders in which affected children and adults are prone to the development of benign and malignant tumors of the nervous system. The purpose of this review is to discuss the spectrum of CNS tumors arising in individuals with NF type 1 (NF1) and NF type 2 (NF2), their pathogenic etiologies, and the rational treatment options for people with these neoplasms. This article is a review of preclinical and clinical data focused on the treatment of the most common CNS tumors encountered in children and adults with NF1 and NF2. Although children with NF1 are at risk for developing low-grade gliomas of the optic pathway and brainstem, individuals with NF2 typically manifest low-grade tumors affecting the cranial nerves (vestibular schwannomas), meninges (meningiomas), and spinal cord (ependymomas). With the identification of the NF1 and NF2 genes, molecularly targeted therapies are beginning to emerge, as a result of a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying NF1 and NF2 protein function. As we enter into an era of precision oncology, a more comprehensive awareness of the factors that increase the risk of developing CNS cancers in affected individuals, coupled with a greater appreciation of the cellular and molecular determinants that maintain tumor growth, will undoubtedly yield more effective therapies for these cancer predisposition syndromes.

[Hereditary tumor syndromes in neuropathology]

Neoplasms in the central (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) in hereditary tumor syndromes play an important role in the neuropathological diagnostics. The benign and malignant PNS and CNS tumors that occur in the frequent neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and type 2 (NF2) often represent essential factors for the course of the disease in those affected. Furthermore, certain clinical constellations (e.g. bilateral schwannomas of the auditory nerve, schwannomas at a young age and multiple meningiomas) can be important indications for a previously undiagnosed hereditary tumor disease. Other tumors occur practically regularly in association with certain germline defects, e.g. subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) in tuberous sclerosis and dysplastic gangliocytoma of the cerebellum in Cowden's syndrome and can be indications in the diagnostics for an extended genetic counselling. This is not only important because many germline defects are based on new mutations, but also for the now established targeted therapy of certain tumors, e.g. inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway using temsirolimus for SEGA. Furthermore, knowledge about the possible constellations of genetic mosaics in hereditary tumor syndromes with the resulting (incomplete) syndrome manifestations is useful. This review article summarizes the most important hereditary tumor syndromes with involvement of the PNS and CNS.

The molecular pathogenesis of schwannomatosis, a paradigm for the co-involvement of multiple tumour suppressor genes in tumorigenesis

Schwannomatosis is characterized by the predisposition to develop multiple schwannomas and, less commonly, meningiomas. Despite the clinical overlap with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), schwannomatosis is not caused by germline NF2 gene mutations. Instead, germline mutations of either the SMARCB1 or LZTR1 tumour suppressor genes have been identified in 86% of familial and 40% of sporadic schwannomatosis patients. In contrast to patients with rhabdoid tumours, which are due to complete loss-of-function SMARCB1 mutations, individuals with schwannomatosis harbour predominantly hypomorphic SMARCB1 mutations which give rise to the synthesis of mutant proteins with residual function that do not cause rhabdoid tumours. Although biallelic mutations of SMARCB1 or LZTR1 have been detected in the tumours of patients with schwannomatosis, the classical two-hit model of tumorigenesis is insufficient to account for schwannoma growth, since NF2 is also frequently inactivated in these tumours. Consequently, tumorigenesis in schwannomatosis must involve the mutation of at least two different tumour suppressor genes, an occurrence frequently mediated by loss of heterozygosity of large parts of chromosome 22q harbouring not only SMARCB1 and LZTR1 but also NF2. Thus, schwannomatosis is paradigmatic for a tumour predisposition syndrome caused by the concomitant mutational inactivation of two or more tumour suppressor genes. This review provides an overview of current models of tumorigenesis and mutational patterns underlying schwannomatosis that will ultimately help to explain the complex clinical presentation of this rare disease.

Creation of an international registry to support discovery in schwannomatosis

Schwannomatosis is a tumor suppressor syndrome that causes multiple tumors along peripheral nerves. Formal diagnostic criteria were first published in 2005. Variability in clinical presentation and a relative lack of awareness of the syndrome have contributed to difficulty recognizing affected individuals and accurately describing the natural history of the disorder. Many critical questions such as the mutations underlying schwannomatosis, genotype-phenotype correlations, inheritance patterns, pathologic diagnosis of schwannomatosis-associated schwannomas, tumor burden in schwannomatosis, the incidence of malignancy, and the effectiveness of current, or new treatments remain unanswered. A well-curated registry of schwannomatosis patients is needed to facilitate research in field. An international consortium of clinicians and scientists across multiple disciplines with expertise in schwannomatosis was established and charged with the task of designing and populating a schwannomatosis patient registry. The International Schwannomatosis Registry (ISR) was built around key data points that allow confirmation of the diagnosis and identification of potential research subjects to advance research to further the knowledge base for schwannomatosis. A registry with 389 participants enrolled to date has been established. Twenty-three additional subjects are pending review. A formal process has been established for scientific investigators to propose research projects, identify eligible subjects, and seek collaborators from ISR sites. Research collaborations have been created using the information collected by the registry and are currently being conducted. The ISR is a platform from which multiple research endeavors can be launched, facilitating connections between affected individuals interested in participating in research and researchers actively investigating a variety of aspects of schwannomatosis. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Neurofibromatosis: A Review of NF1, NF2, and Schwannomatosis

The neurofibromatoses are a heterogeneous group of hereditary cancer syndromes that lead to tumors of the central and peripheral nervous systems, as well as other organ systems. By far the most common form is neurofibromatosis 1 (96%), followed by neurofibromatosis 2 (3%), and a more recently recognized, lesser known form, schwannomatosis. The diagnostic criteria, pathogenesis, molecular considerations, and clinical manifestations are discussed in this review article.

Pediatric schwannomatosis, a rare but distinct form of neurofibromatosis

Schwannomatosis is the third major form of neurofibromatosis, distinct from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and type 1 (NF1). This condition is rare with a variable phenotypic presentation and complex molecular and genetic findings. In this case, a previously healthy teenager was found to have multiple spinal lesions and an enhancing right parotid mass on MRI. On extensive further work-up, this patient met the existing clinical criteria for schwannomatosis. This case report aims to review the clinical features and current diagnostic criteria for schwannomatosis and compare it to NF1 and NF2. Special emphasis will be placed on imaging features that should prompt the radiologist to suggest this rare diagnosis.

Recent developments in brain tumor predisposing syndromes

The etiologies of brain tumors are in the most cases unknown, but improvements in genetics and DNA screening have helped to identify a wide range of brain tumor predisposition disorders. In this review we are discussing some of the most common predisposition disorders, namely: neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2, schwannomatosis, rhabdoid tumor predisposition disorder, nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome (Gorlin), tuberous sclerosis complex, von Hippel-Lindau, Li-Fraumeni and Turcot syndromes. Recent findings from the GLIOGENE collaboration and the newly identified glioma causing gene POT1, will also be discussed. Genetics. We will describe these disorders from a genetic and clinical standpoint, focusing on the difference in clinical symptoms depending on the underlying gene or germline mutation. Central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Most of these disorders predispose the carriers to a wide range of symptoms. Herein, we will focus particularly on tumors affecting the CNS and discuss improvements of targeted therapy for the particular disorders.

An unusual case of schwannomatosis with bilateral maxillary sinus schwannomas and a novel SMARCB1 gene mutation

Schwannomas are benign tumors that arise from Schwann cells in the peripheral nervous system. Patients with multiple schwannomas without signs and symptoms of neurofibromatosis Type 1 or 2 have the rare disease schwannomatosis. Tumors in these patients occur along peripheral nerves throughout the body. Mutations of the SMARCB1 gene have been described as one of the predisposing genetic factors in the development of this disease. This report describes a patient who was observed for 6 years after having undergone removal of 7 schwannomas, including bilateral maxillary sinus schwannomas, a tumor that has not been previously reported. Genetic analysis revealed a novel mutation of c.93G>A in exon 1 of the SMARCB1 gene.

Ultrasound in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy: structure meets function in the neuromuscular clinic

Peripheral nerve ultrasound (US) has emerged as a promising technique for the diagnosis of peripheral nerve disorders. While most experience with US has been reported in the context of nerve entrapment syndromes, the role of US in the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy (PN) has recently been explored. Distinctive US findings have been reported in patients with hereditary, immune-mediated, infectious and axonal PN; US may add complementary information to neurophysiological studies in the diagnostic work-up of PN. This review describes the characteristic US findings in PN reported to date and a classification of abnormal nerve US patterns in PN is proposed. Closer scrutiny of nerve abnormalities beyond assessment of nerve calibre may allow for more accurate diagnostic classification of PN, as well as contribute to the understanding of the intersection of structure and function in PN.

Multiple Schwannomas of the Spine: Review of the Schwannomatosis or Congenital Neurilemmomatosis: A Case Report

Schwannomas are the most common benign nerve sheath tumors originating in Schwann cells. With special conditions like neurofibromatosis type 2 or entity called schwannomatosis, patients develop multiple schwannomas. But in clinical setting, distinguishing schwannomatosis from neurofibromatosis type 2 is challengeable. We describe 58-year-old male who presented with severe neuropathic pain, from schwannomatosis featuring multiple schwannomas of spine and trunk, and underwent surgical treatment. We demonstrate his radiologic and clinical findings, and discuss about important clinical features of this condition. To confirm schwannomatosis, we performed brain magnetic resonance imaging, and took his familial history. Staged surgery was done for pathological confirmation and relief of the pain. Schwannomatosis and neurofibromatosis type 2 are similar but different disease. There are diagnostic hallmarks of these conditions, including familial history, pathology, and brain imaging. Because of different prognosis, the two diseases must be distinguished, so diagnostic tests that are mentioned above should be performed in caution.

Intraosseous schwannoma in schwannomatosis

This study investigates the clinical, radiological, and pathological features of two cases of intraosseous schwannoma that arose in patients with multiple soft tissue schwannomas. In both cases, the patients were adult females and the tibial bone was affected. Vestibular schwannomas were not identified, indicating that these were not cases of neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2). Radiographs showed a well-defined lytic lesion in the proximal tibia; in one case, this was associated with a pathological fracture. Histologically, both cases showed typical features of benign schwannoma. Molecular analysis of one of the excised tumors showed different alterations in the NF2 gene in keeping with a diagnosis of schwannomatosis. Our findings show for the first time that intraosseous schwannomas can occur in schwannomatosis.