1
|
Krajewski KM, Braschi-Amirfarzan M, DiPiro PJ, Jagannathan JP, Shinagare AB. Molecular Targeted Therapy in Modern Oncology: Imaging Assessment of Treatment Response and Toxicities. Korean J Radiol 2017; 18:28-41. [PMID: 28096716 PMCID: PMC5240491 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2016] [Accepted: 09/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncology is a rapidly evolving field with a shift toward personalized cancer treatment. The use of therapies targeted to the molecular features of individual tumors and the tumor microenvironment has become much more common. In this review, anti-angiogenic and other molecular targeted therapies are discussed, with a focus on typical and atypical response patterns and imaging manifestations of drug toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M Krajewski
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Pamela J DiPiro
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jyothi P Jagannathan
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA.; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shinagare AB, Steele E, Braschi-Amirfarzan M, Tirumani SH, Ramaiya NH. Sunitinib-associated Pancreatic Atrophy in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Toxicity with Prognostic Implications Detected at Imaging. Radiology 2016; 281:140-9. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
3
|
Beyond the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Axis: Update on Role of Imaging in Nonantiangiogenic Molecular Targeted Therapies in Oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204:919-32. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.12876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
4
|
García-Figueiras R, Padhani AR, Beer AJ, Baleato-González S, Vilanova JC, Luna A, Oleaga L, Gómez-Caamaño A, Koh DM. Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis for Radiologists--Part 2: Clinical Utility. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2015; 44:425-36. [PMID: 25863438 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2014] [Revised: 02/24/2015] [Accepted: 02/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Angiogenesis is a key cancer hallmark involved in tumor growth and metastasis development. Angiogenesis and tumor microenvironment significantly influence the response of tumors to therapies. Imaging techniques have changed our understanding of the process of angiogenesis, the resulting vascular performance, and the tumor microenvironment. This article reviews the status and potential clinical value of the imaging modalities used to assess the status of tumor vasculature in vivo, before, during, and after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto García-Figueiras
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England, UK
| | - Ambros J Beer
- Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Ulm; Ulm, Germany
| | - Sandra Baleato-González
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Joan C Vilanova
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona, IDI, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Antonio Luna
- Advanced Medical Imaging, Clinica Las Nieves, SERCOSA (Servicio Radiologia Computerizada), Grupo Health Time, Jaén, Spain; Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Laura Oleaga
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Functional Imaging, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bata P, Tarnoki DL, Tarnoki AD, Novak PK, Gyebnar J, Kekesi D, Szendroi A, Fejer B, Szasz AM, Nyirady P, Karlinger K, Berczi V. Transitional cell and clear cell renal carcinoma: differentiation of distinct histological types with multiphase CT. Acta Radiol 2014; 55:1112-9. [PMID: 24243889 DOI: 10.1177/0284185113510493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) may mimic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) when it develops in a similar location, therefore, differentiation with imaging techniques might be challenging. Preoperative differentiation may have a significant role indicating the type of surgical treatment (nephrectomy vs. ureteronephrectomy). PURPOSE To retrospectively analyze the differences in the contrast enhancement of TCC and RCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS Images of 20 RCC and 12 TCC (mean ages, 62.3 ± 14.1 and 67.4 ± 12.0 years, respectively) were analyzed from patients who underwent multiphase computed tomography (CT) examinations following 1.5 mL/kg non-ionic contrast agent administration. Unenhanced corticomedullary (30-45 s), nephrographic (70-90 s), and excretory (300-480 s) phases were imaged. The attenuation characteristics of RCC and TCC were compared to the attenuation of the normal renal cortex. RESULTS Significant differences were found in the attenuation ratios between RCC or TCC in the corticomedullary (P = 0.040) and nephrographic (P = 0.004) phases using three regions of interest (ROIs) of 10 mm(2) size. If measuring ROIs comprising the complete tumor lesion instead of three small ROIs, no significant difference was observed in the attenuation ratios between RCC in TCC in any phases. CONCLUSION Our study reports significant attenuation differences between RCC and TCC in the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases by multiphase CT. The findings underscore the importance of multiphase CT in the differentiation of these two different entities. Using multiple small (three) ROIs is more accurate than measuring the whole tumor attenuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pal Bata
- Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - David Laszlo Tarnoki
- Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Pal Kaposi Novak
- Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Janos Gyebnar
- Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Dora Kekesi
- Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Attila Szendroi
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Bence Fejer
- Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - A Marcell Szasz
- Second Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Peter Nyirady
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Kinga Karlinger
- Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Viktor Berczi
- Department of Radiology and Oncotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is most commonly diagnosed as an incidental finding on cross-sectional imaging and represents a significant clinical challenge. Although most patients have a surgically curable lesion at the time of diagnosis, the variability in the biologic behavior of the different histologic subtypes and tumor grade of RCC, together with the increasing array of management options, creates uncertainty for the optimal clinical approach to individual patients. State-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a comprehensive assessment of renal lesions that includes multiple forms of tissue contrast as well as functional parameters, which in turn provides information that helps to address this dilemma. In this article, we review this evolving and increasingly comprehensive role of MRI in the detection, characterization, perioperative evaluation, and assessment of the treatment response of renal neoplasms. We emphasize the ability of the imaging "phenotype" of renal masses on MRI to help predict the histologic subtype, grade, and clinical behavior of RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Campbell
- Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
- Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
León L, García-Figueiras R, García-Figueras R, Suárez C, Arjonilla A, Puente J, Vargas B, Méndez Vidal MJ, Sebastiá C. Recommendations for the clinical and radiological evaluation of response to treatment in metastatic renal cell cancer. Target Oncol 2013; 9:9-24. [PMID: 24338498 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-013-0304-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2013] [Accepted: 11/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The evaluation of response to treatment is a critical step for determining the effectiveness of oncology drugs. Targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are active drugs in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, treatment with this type of drugs may not result in significant reductions in tumor size, so standard evaluation criteria based on tumor size, such as Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), may be inappropriate for evaluating response to treatment in patients with mRCC. In fact, targeted therapies apparently yield low response rates that do not reflect increased disease control they may cause and, consequently, the benefit in terms of time to progression. To improve the clinical and radiological evaluation of response to treatment in patients with mRCC treated with targeted drugs, a group of 32 experts in this field have reviewed different aspects related to this issue and have put together a series of recommendations with the intention of providing guidance to clinicians on this matter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luís León
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, A Coruña, Spain,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|