Catheter-based treatments for hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:717-724. [PMID: 25247935 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.14.12983]

Various Markers of Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Narrative Review

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are uncommon tumors that develop from specialized endocrine cells. Thyroid medullary carcinoma, phaeochromocytomas, pituitary tumors, carcinoid, and gastroenteropancreatic NET are just a few examples of the diverse group known as NET. In recent times, they have garnered significant interest due to their ease of palliation and ability to reveal the long-term impact of the specific hormone raised. Neuroendocrine indicators, particularly chromogranin A, are very helpful in the diagnostic process. Accurate biomarkers that can be employed for NET diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up, therapy stratification, and treatment response evaluation are greatly needed. Due to the great diversity of neuroendocrine neoplasms, particular biomarkers must be developed in order to diagnose, treat, and identify them. The several NET biomarkers covered in this review will aid in the fight against this uncommon illness.

Neuroendocrine Tumors: Genomics and Molecular Biomarkers with a Focus on Metastatic Disease

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are considered rare tumors that originate from specialized endocrine cells. Patients often present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, which negatively impacts their quality of life and overall survival. An understanding of the genetic mutations that drive these tumors and the biomarkers used to detect new NET cases is important to identify patients at an earlier disease stage. Elevations in CgA, synaptophysin, and 5-HIAA are most commonly used to identify NETs and assess prognosis; however, new advances in whole genome sequencing and multigenomic blood assays have allowed for a greater understanding of the drivers of NETs and more sensitive and specific tests to diagnose tumors and assess disease response. Treating NET liver metastases is important in managing hormonal or carcinoid symptoms and is imperative to improve patient survival. Treatment for liver-dominant disease is varied; delineating biomarkers that may predict response will allow for better patient stratification.

The State of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy and Its Sequencing among Current Therapeutic Options for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are the most common form of neuroendocrine neoplasia, but there is no current consensus for the sequencing of approved therapies, particularly with respect to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This comprehensive review evaluates the data supporting approved therapies for GEP-NETs and recommendations for therapeutic sequencing with a focus on how PRRT currently fits within sequencing algorithms. The current recommendations for PRRT sequencing restrict its use to metastatic, inoperable, progressive midgut NETs; however, this may change with emerging data to suggest that PRRT might be beneficial as neoadjuvant therapy for inoperable tumors, is more tolerable than other treatment modalities following first-line standard dose somatostatin analogs, and can be used as salvage therapy after disease relapse following prior successful cycles of PRRT. PRRT has also been shown to reduce tumor burden, improve quality of life, and prolong the time to disease progression in a broad spectrum of patients with GEP-NETs. As the various potential benefits of PRRT in GEP-NET therapy continues to expand, it is necessary to review and critically evaluate our treatment algorithms for GEP-NETs.

Anatomic and Functional Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can occur in a wide variety of organs and display a spectrum of pathologic behavior. Accurate and effective imaging is paramount to the diagnosis, staging, therapy, and surveillance of patients with NET. There have been continuous advancements in the imaging of NET which includes anatomic and functional techniques.

Characterization of Liver Metastases During Catheter-Directed Liver Interventions: A Comparison between Dual Phase Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Conventional Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography

Objectives:

To compare the diagnostic performance of intra-arterial dual phase cone-beam computed tomography (DP-CBCT) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) when characterizing tumor burden in patients with metastatic liver cancer.

Materials and Methods:

This retrospective study included 29 patients with colorectal (n =10), breast (n = 9) and neuroendocrine (n = 10) liver metastases, referred for catheter-directed treatment. Tumor type, number, maximum size, and appearance were assessed. Paired-sample t-tests compared image quality, tumor numbers, and diameters between imaging modalities.

Results:

Image quality was not different between DP-CBCT and CE-CT (p = 0.9). In 18 patients (62%) DP-CBCT and CE-CT showed diffuse, uncountable metastases in the liver. Of the remaining 11 patients, DP-CBCT identified two patients with diffuse tumors that appeared as a sum of 17 distinct metastases on CE-CT. In the remaining nine patients a total of 102 metastases were found using both DP-CBCT and CE-CT. Tumor detection accuracy was 98% in DP-CBCT and 67% in CE-CT (p = 0.025). Metastases were larger in diameter on DP-CBCT: colorectal: 57 +/– 9.5 mm versus 43 +/– 8.3 mm (p = 0.02); breast: 57 +/– 10 mm versus 43 +/– 8.5 mm (p = 0.03) and neuroendocrine: 56 +/– 6.3 mm versus 51 +/– 5.8 mm (p = 0.01). Rim enhancement appeared in 100% of patients with colorectal and 89% of patients with breast metastases on DP-CBCT, but was variable on CE-CT. Neuroendocrine tumors had variable rim enhancement within the same patient and across imaging modalities.

Conclusions:

DP-CBCT of the liver may demonstrate larger metastatic tumor burden and lesion size with a variable contrast enhancement compared to CE-CT.

Liver-directed therapies for liver metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: Can laser ablation play any role?

Aggressive cytoreduction can prolong survival in patients with unresectable liver metastases (LM) from neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), and minimally invasive, liver-directed therapies are gaining increasing interest. Catheter-based treatments are used in disseminated disease, whereas ablation techniques are usually indicated when the number of LM is limited. Although radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is by far the most used ablative technique, the goal of this opinion review is to explore the potential role of laser ablation (LA) in the treatment of LM from NEN. LA uses thinner needles than RFA, and this is an advantage when the tumors are in at-risk locations. Moreover, the multi-fiber technique enables the use of one to four laser fibers at once, and each fiber provides an almost spherical thermal lesion of 12-15 mm in diameter. Such a characteristic enables to tailor the size of each thermal lesion to the size of each tumor, sparing the liver parenchyma more than any other liver-directed therapy, and allowing for repeated treatments with low risk of liver failure. A recent retrospective study reporting the largest series of LM treated with LA documents both safety and effectiveness of LA, that can play a useful role in the multimodality approach to LM from NEN.

Percutaneous Laser Ablation of Liver Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasm. A Retrospective Study for Safety and Effectiveness

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess safety and efficacy of laser ablation (LA) of multiple liver metastases (LM) from neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN).

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with NEN and at least 3 LM ≤ 4 cm in diameter underwent ultrasonography-guided LA. Up to seven LM were ablated in a single session; if the number of LM exceeded seven, the remaining LM were ablated in further LA sessions with a time interval of 3-4 weeks. LA was performed according to the multifiber technique. The patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT 1 month after LA, and were subsequently monitored every 3 months for the first 2 years and then every 6 months.

RESULTS

In total, 189 LM were treated in 21 patients (mean 9 ± 8.2, median 6) in 41 LA sessions (range 1-5). The diameter of LM ranged from 5 to 35 mm (median 19 mm, mean 17.9 ± 6.4 mm). One grade 4 complication occurred (0.53%): a bowel perforation managed by surgery. Technical efficacy was 100%, primary efficacy rate 94.7%, and secondary efficacy rate 100%. Complete relief of hormone-related symptoms was obtained in all the 13 symptomatic patients. Median follow-up was 39 months (range 12-99). 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 95%, 86%, 66%, and 40%, respectively. Overall survival resulted higher for patients with Ki-67 expression ≤ 7% than for those with Ki-67 > 7% (p = 0.0347).

CONCLUSIONS

LA is a promising and safe technique to treat LM from NEN. A longer follow-up should provide definitive information on the long-term efficacy of this liver-directed therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective study, local non-random sample, level 3.

Transarterial Delivery of a Biodegradable Single-Agent Theranostic Nanoprobe for Liver Tumor Imaging and Combinatorial Phototherapy

PURPOSE

To assess selective accumulation of biodegradable nanoparticles within hepatic tumors after transarterial delivery for in vivo localization and combinatorial phototherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A VX2 hepatic tumor model was used in New Zealand white rabbits. Transarterial delivery of silicon naphthalocyanine biodegradable nanoparticles was performed using a microcatheter via the proper hepatic artery. Tumors were exposed via laparotomy, and nanoparticles were observed by near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging. For phototherapy, a handheld NIR laser (785 nm) at 0.6 W/cm² was used to expose tumor or background liver, and tissue temperatures were assessed with a fiberoptic temperature probe. Intratumoral reactive oxygen species formation was assessed using a fluorophore (2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate).

RESULTS

Nanoparticles selectively accumulated within viable tumor by NIR fluorescence. Necrotic portions of tumor did not accumulate nanoparticles, consistent with a vascular distribution. NIR-dependent heat generation was observed with nanoparticle-containing tumors, but not in background liver. No heat was generated in the absence of NIR laser light. Reactive oxygen species were formed in nanoparticle-containing tumors exposed to NIR laser light, but not in background liver treated with NIR laser or in tumors in the absence of NIR light.

CONCLUSIONS

Biodegradable nanoparticle delivery to liver tumors from a transarterial approach enabled selective in vivo tumor imaging and combinatorial phototherapy.

Embolization of metastatic neuroendocrine tumor resulting in clinical manifestations of syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone

Complications after hepatic artery embolization are usually minor and transient. This report describes a patient with a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with hepatic metastases who repeatedly developed clinical findings of syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone with hyponatremia (sodium < 130 mEq/L), low plasma osmolarity (< 275 mOsm/kg), and high urine osmolarity (> 500 mOsm/kg) after every session of hepatic artery embolization.