1
|
Lo HZ, Choy KT, Kong JCH. FDG-PET/MRI in colorectal cancer care: an updated systematic review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04460-z. [PMID: 39073608 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04460-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Since its introduction in 2011, FDG-PET/MRI has been advocated as a useful adjunct in colorectal cancer care. However, gaps and limitations in current research remain. This systematic review aims to review the current literature to quantify the utility of FDG-PET/MRI in colorectal cancer care. METHODS An up-to-date review was performed on the available literature between 2000 and 2023 on PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, databases. All studies reporting on the use of FDG-PET/MRI in colorectal cancer care were analyzed. The main outcome measures were accuracy in initial staging, restaging, and detection of metastatic disease in both rectal as well as colon cancers. The secondary outcome was comparing the performance of FDG-PET/MRI versus Standard of Care Imaging (SCI). Finally, the clinical significance of FDG-PET/MRI was measured in the change in management resulting from imaging findings. RESULTS A total of 22 observational studies were included, accounting for 988 patients. When individually compared to current Standard of Care Imaging (SCI)-MRI pelvis for rectal cancer and thoraco-abdominal contrast CT, PET/MRI proved superior in terms of distant metastatic disease detection. This led to as much as 21.0% change in management. However, the technological limitations of PET/MRI were once again highlighted, suggesting SCI should retain its place as first-line imaging. CONCLUSION FDG-PET/MRI appears to be a promising adjunct in staging and restaging of colorectal cancer in carefully selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Zhen Lo
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Kay Tai Choy
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joseph Cherng Huei Kong
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jayaprakasam VS, Ince S, Suman G, Nepal P, Hope TA, Paspulati RM, Fraum TJ. PET/MRI in colorectal and anal cancers: an update. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:3558-3583. [PMID: 37062021 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03897-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) in the era of personalized medicine has a unique role in the management of oncological patients and offers several advantages over standard anatomical imaging. However, the role of molecular imaging in lower GI malignancies has historically been limited due to suboptimal anatomical evaluation on the accompanying CT, as well as significant physiological 18F-flurodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the bowel. In the last decade, technological advancements have made whole-body FDG-PET/MRI a feasible alternative to PET/CT and MRI for lower GI malignancies. PET/MRI combines the advantages of molecular imaging with excellent soft tissue contrast resolution. Hence, it constitutes a unique opportunity to improve the imaging of these cancers. FDG-PET/MRI has a potential role in initial diagnosis, assessment of local treatment response, and evaluation for metastatic disease. In this article, we review the recent literature on FDG-PET/MRI for colorectal and anal cancers; provide an example whole-body FDG-PET/MRI protocol; highlight potential interpretive pitfalls; and provide recommendations on particular clinical scenarios in which FDG-PET/MRI is likely to be most beneficial for these cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Semra Ince
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Garima Suman
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Pankaj Nepal
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Tyler J Fraum
- Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lingas EC. Early-Onset Colon Cancer: A Narrative Review of Its Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Prognosis. Cureus 2023; 15:e45404. [PMID: 37854763 PMCID: PMC10579844 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Colon cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and there has been a rise in the incidence of early-onset colon cancer or colon cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years old. Early-onset colon cancer has several differences in clinical presentation, as well as histopathology, genetic alteration, and molecular profiling. Early-onset colon cancer can be differentiated into familial type that includes hereditary familial syndrome and sporadic type. Demographic variance also exists in both developing and developed countries. Due to the rising incidence of colon cancer diagnosed in younger age, it is imperative to examine the available evidence regarding the mortality rate of early-onset colon cancer. Colon cancer is affected by numerous modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. Increasing obesity and lifestyle disorders in the younger population, such as smoking, may influence this increasing trend. There are existing guidelines for colon cancer screening in both average-risk and high-risk individuals. This narrative review aims to highlight the pathogenesis of early-onset CRC; its clinical presentation, treatment, prognosis; and how it differs from late-onset CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvina C Lingas
- Hospital Medicine, New York University (NYU) Langone Health Long Island Community Hospital, Patchogue, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tey J, Tan JK, Tan KK, Soon YY, Loi HY, Mohamed JSA, Bakulbhai PA, Ang B, Liang TY. Restaging of rectal cancer with hybrid positron emission tomography magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2023; 52:289-295. [PMID: 38904510 DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
Introduction This study determines the sensitivity and specificity of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) parameters in predicting treatment response in patients with localised rectal cancer who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Method Patients with stage I-III adenocarcinoma of the rectum planned for preoperative CRT followed by surgery were recruited. Patients had PET/MRI scans at baseline and 6-8 weeks post-CRT. Functional MRI and PET parameters were assessed for their diagnostic accuracy for tumour regression grade (TRG). Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to determine the area under the ROC curve (AUC), and the sensitivity and specificity of each quantile cut-off. Results A total of 31 patients were recruited, of whom 20 completed study protocol. All patients included had mid or lower rectal tumours. There were 16 patients (80%) with node-positive disease at presentation. The median time to surgery was 75.5 days (range 52-106 days). Histopathological assessment revealed 20% good responders (TRG 1/2), and the remaining 80% of patients had a poor response (TRG 3/4). When predicting good responders, the AUC values for percent maximum thickness reduction and percent apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) change were 0.82 and 0.73, respectively. A maximum thickness reduction cut-off of >47% and a percent ADC change of >20% yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 75%/95% and 75%/73%, respectively. Conclusion Parameters such as percent maximum thickness reduction and percent ADC change may be useful for predicting good responders in patients undergoing preoperative CRT for rectal cancer. Larger studies are warranted to establish the utility of PET/MRI in rectal cancer staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Tey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Jarrod Kh Tan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore
| | - Ker-Kan Tan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore
| | - Yu Yang Soon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Hoi Yin Loi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | - Bertrand Ang
- Department of Radiology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Thian Yee Liang
- Department of Radiology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee S, Surabhi VR, Kassam Z, Chang KJ, Kaur H. Imaging of colon and rectal cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 2023:100970. [PMID: 37330400 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.100970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Colon and rectal cancer imaging has traditionally been performed to assess for distant disease (typically lung and liver metastases) and to assess the resectability of the primary tumor. With technological and scientific advances in imaging and the evolution of treatment options, the role of imaging has expanded. Radiologists are now expected to provide a precise description of primary tumor invasion extent, including adjacent organ invasion, involvement of the surgical resection plane, extramural vascular invasion, lymphadenopathy, and response to neoadjuvant treatment, and to monitor for recurrence after clinical complete response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Lee
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA.
| | - Venkateswar R Surabhi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Zahra Kassam
- Department of Medical Imaging, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, St Joseph's Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin J Chang
- Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Harmeet Kaur
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yoo J, Lee JM, Joo I, Lee DH, Yoon JH, Yu MH, Jang JY, Lee SH. Post-neoadjuvant treatment pancreatic cancer resectability and outcome prediction using CT, 18F-FDG PET/MRI and CA 19-9. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:49. [PMID: 37217958 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00565-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CT prediction of resectability and prognosis following neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains challenging. This study aims to determine whether addition of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) postiron emission tomography (PET)/MRI and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) can improve accuracy of predicting resectability compared to CECT alone and predict prognosis in PDAC patients after NAT. METHODS In this retrospective study, 120 PDAC patients (65 women; mean age, 66.7 years [standard deviation, 8.4]) underwent CECT, PET/MRI, and CA 19-9 examinations after NAT between January 2013 and June 2021. Three board-certified radiologists independently rated the overall resectability on a 5-point scale (score 5, definitely resectable) in three sessions (session 1, CECT; 2, CECT plus PET/MRI─no FDG avidity and no diffusion restriction at tumor-vessel contact indicated modification of CECT scores to ≥ 3; 3, CECT plus PET plus CA 19-9─no FDG avidity at tumor-vessel contact and normalized CA 19-9 indicated modification of CECT scores to ≥ 3). Jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic method and generalized estimating equations were used to compare pooled area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of three sessions. Predictors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Each session showed different pooled AUC (session 1 vs. 2 vs. 3, 0.853 vs. 0.873 vs. 0.874, p = 0.026), sensitivity (66.2% [137/207] vs. 86.0% [178/207] vs. 84.5% [175/207], p < 0.001) and specificity (67.3% [103/153] vs. 58.8% [90/153] vs. 60.1% [92/153], p = 0.048). According to pairwise comparison, specificity of CECT plus PET/MRI was lower than that of CECT alone (adjusted p = 0.042), while there was no significant difference in specificity between CECT alone and CECT plus PET plus CA 19-9 (adjusted p = 0.081). Twenty-eight of 69 patients (40.6%) with R0 resection experienced tumor recurrence (mean follow-up, 18.0 months). FDG avidity at tumor-vessel contact on post-NAT PET (HR = 4.37, p = 0.033) and pathologically confirmed vascular invasion (HR = 5.36, p = 0.004) predicted RFS. CONCLUSION Combination of CECT, PET and CA 19-9 increased area under the curve and sensitivity for determining resectability, compared to CECT alone, without compromising the specificity. Furthermore, 18F-FDG avidity at tumor-vessel contact on post-NAT PET predicted RFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeongin Yoo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Ijin Joo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hee Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Hye Yu
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of General Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hyub Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ren Q, Chen Y, Shao X, Guo L, Xu X. Lymph nodes primary staging of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:162. [PMID: 37143144 PMCID: PMC10157899 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01124-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for lymph node (LN) metastasis primary staging in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS This study was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA-DTA statement. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) were searched for studies on 18F-FDG PET/MRI for diagnosing LN metastasis. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), and area under the curve (AUC) were applied to assess the diagnostic performance. Heterogeneity was identified and processed using meta-regression and sensitivity analysis. All data analyses were performed via STATA 15 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. RESULTS There were finally 7 studies included, involving a total of 184 patients. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.108 (P = 0.818), with no threshold-effect observed. The pooled SEN was 0.81 (95%CI 0.66-0.90) and the SPE was 0.89 (95% CI 0.73-0.96). In sub-groups, prospective groups demonstrated to have the highest SEN of 0.92 (95%CI 0.79-1.00). The studies conducted by Catalano et al. and Kang et al. were considered to be potential sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION 18F-FDG PET/MRI has shown remarkable diagnostic performance in identification of LN metastases in newly diagnosed CRC patients. It would be of great application value for the primary staging of CRC lymph node metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingwei Ren
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongyang, China
| | - Yanyan Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dongyang Women & Children Hospital, No. 40, Wuning East Road, Dongyang, 322100, China.
| | - Xuejun Shao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongyang, China
| | - Lanzhong Guo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dongyang Women & Children Hospital, No. 40, Wuning East Road, Dongyang, 322100, China
| | - Xinxin Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dongyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen MZ, Zhang X, Mui M, Kong JCH, Heriot AG, Ellis-Clark J. Retrospective audit: Utility of PET scan in routine preoperative rectal cancer staging. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:617-621. [PMID: 36117452 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate staging for rectal cancer is pertinent with recent introduction of rectum-sparing approaches for patients showing complete clinical response on restaging. Positron emission tomography(PET) is used in detection of recurrence or metastasis, but its value in routine preoperative rectal cancer staging remains unclear. Studies report that preoperative PET altered the stage in 39% and changed the management in 17-27% of patients. Our study aims to look at the utility of PET in routine preoperative staging of rectal cancer within 2 two colorectal units, and to determine if PET did result in a change in management. METHODS Patients in Nepean Hospital (NSW) and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (VIC) who were diagnosed with rectal cancer between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. All patients who did not have a PET scan were excluded. PET scan results were then compared with MRI and CT results. RESULTS Three hundred and fifty-seven patients were included in the study. 30.3% of the patients had Stage 3 rectal cancer. 71.7% received neoadjuvant therapy. PET scan provided additional information in 55.5% of patients when compared with CT and MRI alone; 18.2% of the PET findings resulted in an altered management for the patient. CONCLUSION PET scan can be a valuable tool in accurate staging, especially for ambiguous or equivocal lesions on CT. Our study demonstrated that additional information from PET scan resulted in an altered management plan in 18.2% of the patients. PET/MRI as a newer modality may be more accurate with reduced radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Zhiyun Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Xinyi Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Milton Mui
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joseph C H Kong
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jodie Ellis-Clark
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rooney S, Meyer J, Afzal Z, Ashcroft J, Cheow H, De Paepe KN, Powar M, Simillis C, Wheeler J, Davies J, Joshi H. The Role of Preoperative Imaging in the Detection of Lateral Lymph Node Metastases in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:1436-1446. [PMID: 36102825 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different techniques exist for the imaging of lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of pelvic MRI, 18 F-FDG-PET/CT, and 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI for the identification of lateral lymph node metastases in rectal cancer. DATA SOURCES Data sources include PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTION All studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of pelvic MRI, 18 F-FDG-PET/CT, and 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI for the preoperative detection of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer were selected. INTERVENTIONS The interventions were pelvic MRI, 18 F-FDG-PET/CT, and/or 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Definitive histopathology was used as a criterion standard. RESULTS A total of 20 studies (1,827 patients) were included out of an initial search yielding 7,360 studies. The pooled sensitivity of pelvic MRI was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91), of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.86), and of 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.51-0.87) for the detection of lateral lymph node metastasis. The pooled specificity of pelvic MRI was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.86-0.98), and of 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-0.96). The area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91) for pelvic MRI and was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80-0.86) for 18 F-FDG-PET/CT. LIMITATIONS Heterogeneity in terms of patients' populations, definitions of suspect lateral lymph nodes, and administration of neoadjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS For the preoperative identification of lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer, this review found compelling evidence that pelvic MRI should constitute the imaging modality of choice. In contrast, to confirm the presence of lateral lymph node metastasis, 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI modalities allow discarding false positive cases because of increased specificity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020200319.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhan Rooney
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Meyer
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Medical School, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Zeeshan Afzal
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - James Ashcroft
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Heok Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine/Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Katja N De Paepe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine/Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Powar
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Constantinos Simillis
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - James Wheeler
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Justin Davies
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Medical School, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Heman Joshi
- Department of Surgery, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Diagnostic performance of [ 18F]-FDG PET/MR in evaluating colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:4205-4217. [PMID: 35705874 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05871-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To calculate the diagnostic performance of [18F]-FDG PET/MR in colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS This study was designed following the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. To be included, published original articles (until December 31, 2021) that met the following criteria were considered eligible: (1) evaluated [18F]-FDG PET/MR as the diagnostic method to detect CRC; (2) compared [18F]-FDG PET/MR with histopathology as the reference standard, or clinical/imaging composite follow-up when pathology was not available; (3) provided adequate crude data for meta-analysis. The diagnostic pooled measurements were calculated at patient and lesion levels. Regarding sub-group analysis, diagnostic measurements were calculated in "TNM staging," "T staging," "N staging," "M staging," and "liver metastasis" sub-groups. Additionally, we calculated the pooled performances in "rectal cancer: patient-level" and "rectal cancer: lesion-level" sub-groups. A hierarchical method was used to pool the performances. The bivariate model was conducted to find the summary points. Analyses were performed using STATA 16. RESULTS A total of 1534 patients from 18 studies were entered. The pooled sensitivities in CRC lesion detection (tumor, lymph nodes, and metastases) were 0.94 (95%CI: 0.89-0.97) and 0.93 (95%CI: 0.82-0.98) at patient-level and lesion-level, respectively. The pooled specificities were 0.89 (95%CI: 0.84-0.93) and 0.95 (95%CI: 0.90-0.98) at patient-level and lesion-level, respectively. In sub-groups, the highest sensitivity (0.97, 95%CI: 0.86-0.99) and specificity (0.99, 95%CI: 0.84-1.00) were calculated for "M staging" and "rectal cancer: lesion-level," respectively. The lowest sensitivity (0.81, 95%CI: 0.65-0.91) and specificity (0.79, 95%CI: 0.52-0.93) were calculated for "N staging" and "T staging," respectively. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed an overall high diagnostic performance for [18F]-FDG PET/MR in detecting CRC lesions/metastases. Thus, this modality can play a significant role in several clinical scenarios in CRC staging and restaging. Specifically, one of the main strengths of this modality is ruling out the existence of CRC lesions/metastases. Finally, the overall diagnostic performance was not found to be affected in the post-treatment setting.
Collapse
|
11
|
Borgheresi A, De Muzio F, Agostini A, Ottaviani L, Bruno A, Granata V, Fusco R, Danti G, Flammia F, Grassi R, Grassi F, Bruno F, Palumbo P, Barile A, Miele V, Giovagnoni A. Lymph Nodes Evaluation in Rectal Cancer: Where Do We Stand and Future Perspective. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092599. [PMID: 35566723 PMCID: PMC9104021 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The assessment of nodal involvement in patients with rectal cancer (RC) is fundamental in disease management. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is routinely used for local and nodal staging of RC by using morphological criteria. The actual dimensional and morphological criteria for nodal assessment present several limitations in terms of sensitivity and specificity. For these reasons, several different techniques, such as Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI), Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM), Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (DKI), and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) in MRI have been introduced but still not fully validated. Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT plays a pivotal role in the assessment of LNs; more recently PET/MRI has been introduced. The advantages and limitations of these imaging modalities will be provided in this narrative review. The second part of the review includes experimental techniques, such as iron-oxide particles (SPIO), and dual-energy CT (DECT). Radiomics analysis is an active field of research, and the evidence about LNs in RC will be discussed. The review also discusses the different recommendations between the European and North American guidelines for the evaluation of LNs in RC, from anatomical considerations to structured reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.A.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy;
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.A.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
| | - Letizia Ottaviani
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.A.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Federica Flammia
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80128 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Division of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80128 Naples, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Abruzzo Health Unit 1, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy; (G.D.); (R.G.); (F.G.); (F.B.); (P.P.); (V.M.)
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (A.B.); (A.A.); (A.B.); (A.G.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, 60126 Ancona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Imaging of Oligometastatic Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061427. [PMID: 35326586 PMCID: PMC8946296 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The imaging of oligometastatic disease (OMD) is challenging as it requires precise loco-regional staging and whole-body assessment. The combination of imaging modalities is often required. The more accurate imaging tool will be selected according to tumor type, the timing with regard to measurement and treatment, metastatic location, and the patient’s individual risk for metastasis. The most commonly used modalities are contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging and metabolic and receptor-specific imaging, particularly, 18F-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT, used alone or in combination. Abstract Oligometastatic disease (OMD) is an emerging state of disease with limited metastatic tumor burden. It should be distinguished from polymetastatic disease due the potential curative therapeutic options of OMD. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with OMD. The imaging tools needed in the case of OMD will differ according to different parameters, which include primary tumor type, timing between measurement and treatment, potential metastatic location and the patient’s individual risk for metastasis. In this article, OMD is defined and the use of different imaging modalities in several oncologic situations are described in order to better understand OMD and its specific implication for radiologists.
Collapse
|
13
|
Çelebi F, Görmez A, Serkan Ilgun A, Tokat Y, Cem Balcı N. The role of 18F- FDG PET/MRI in preoperative prediction of MVI in patients with HCC. Eur J Radiol 2022; 149:110196. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
14
|
Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23031339. [PMID: 35163262 PMCID: PMC8835851 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Humans are exposed to a complex mix of man-made electric and magnetic fields (MFs) at many different frequencies, at home and at work. Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between residential/domestic and occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and some types of cancer, although some other studies indicate no relationship. In this review, after an introduction on the MF definition and a description of natural/anthropogenic sources, the epidemiology of residential/domestic and occupational exposure to MFs and cancer is reviewed, with reference to leukemia, brain, and breast cancer. The in vivo and in vitro effects of MFs on cancer are reviewed considering both human and animal cells, with particular reference to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). MF application on cancer diagnostic and therapy (theranostic) are also reviewed by describing the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications for the detection of several cancers. Finally, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is described in terms of treatment of cancer by nanomedical applications for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs, nanosurgery by magnetomechanic methods, and selective killing of cancer cells by magnetic hyperthermia. The supplementary tables provide quantitative data and methodologies in epidemiological and cell biology studies. Although scientists do not generally agree that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to MF and cancer, MFs might not be the direct cause of cancer but may contribute to produce ROS and generate oxidative stress, which could trigger or enhance the expression of oncogenes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Boktor RR, Lee ST, Scott AM. PET/CT imaging in colorectal carcinoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00033-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
16
|
Currie GM, Leon JL, Nevo E, Kamvosoulis PV. PET/MR Part 4: Clinical Applications of PET/MRI. J Nucl Med Technol 2021; 50:jnmt.121.263288. [PMID: 34872917 DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.121.263288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Position emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a hybrid modality provides novel imaging opportunities. While there are a very broad array of pathologies that could benefit from PET/MRI, there is only a narrow range of applications where benefit over standard care justifies the higher resource utilization and, in particular, offers a net positive trade-off over PET/CT. This benefit is generally associated with the omission of CT and the associated radiation dose from the patient workup. This manuscript provides a summary of the generally accepted clinical applications of PET/MRI in both adult and pediatric populations. While there are a number of potential applications and certainly exciting research that may expand applications in the future, the purpose of this paper was to focus on current, mainstream applications. This is the final manuscript in a four-part integrated series sponsored by the SNMMI-TS PET/MR Task Force in conjunction with the SNMMI-TS Publication Committee.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elad Nevo
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Queiroz MA, Ortega CD, Ferreira FR, Capareli FC, Nahas SC, Cerri GG, Buchpiguel CA. Value of Primary Rectal Tumor PET/MRI in the Prediction of Synchronic Metastatic Disease. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 24:453-463. [PMID: 34755248 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01674-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the associations between positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features for primary rectal tumors and metastases. PROCEDURES Between November 2016 and April 2018, 101 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma were included in this prospective study (NCT02537340) for whole-body PET/MRI for baseline staging. Two readers analyzed the PET/MRI; they assessed the semiquantitative PET features of the primary tumor and the N- and M-stages. Another reader analyzed the MRI features for locoregional staging. The reference standard for confirming metastatic disease was biopsy or imaging follow-up. Non-parametric tests were used to compare the PET/MRI features of the participants with or without metastatic disease. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the associations between the primary tumor PET/MRI features and metastatic disease. RESULTS A total of 101 consecutive participants (median age 62 years; range: 33-87 years) were included. Metastases were detected in 35.6% (36 of 101) of the participants. Among the PET/MRI features, higher tumor lesion glycolysis (352.95 vs 242.70; P = .46) and metabolic tumor volume (36.15 vs 26.20; P = .03) were more frequent in patients with than in those without metastases. Additionally, patients with metastases had a higher incidence of PET-positive (64% vs 32%; P = .009) and MRI-positive (56% vs 32%; P = .03) mesorectal lymph nodes, extramural vascular invasion (86% vs 49%; P > .001), and involvement of mesorectal fascia (64% vs 42%; P = .04); there were also differences between the mrT stages of these two groups (P = .008). No differences in the maximum standardized uptake values for the primary tumors in patients with and without metastases were observed (18.9 vs 19.1; P = .56). Multivariable logistic regression showed that extramural vascular invasion on MRI was the only significant predictor (adjusted odds ratio, 3.8 [95% CI: 1.1, 13.9]; P = .001). CONCLUSION PET/MRI facilitated the identification of participants with a high risk of metastatic disease, though these findings were based mainly on MRI features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo A Queiroz
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Doutor Ovidio Pires de Campos, 872, Sao Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
| | - Cinthia D Ortega
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Felipe R Ferreira
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Fernanda C Capareli
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Sergio C Nahas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Giovanni G Cerri
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Carlos A Buchpiguel
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Doutor Ovidio Pires de Campos, 872, Sao Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Furtado FS, Suarez-Weiss KE, Vangel M, Clark JW, Cusack JC, Hong T, Blaszkowsky L, Wo J, Striar R, Umutlu L, Daldrup-Link HE, Groshar D, Rocco R, Bordeianou L, Anderson MA, Mojtahed A, Qadan M, Ferrone C, Catalano OA. Clinical impact of PET/MRI in oligometastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2021; 125:975-982. [PMID: 34282295 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01494-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is potentially curable and demands individualised strategies. METHODS This single-centre retrospective study investigated if positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MR) had a clinical impact on oligometastatic CRC relative to the standard of care imaging (SCI). Adult patients with oligometastatic CRC on SCI who also underwent PET/MR between 3/2016 and 3/2019 were included. The exclusion criterion was lack of confirmatory standard of reference, either surgical pathology, intraoperative gross confirmation or imaging follow-up. SCI consisted of contrast-enhanced (CE) computed tomography (CT) of the chest/abdomen/pelvis, abdominal/pelvic CE-MR, and/or CE whole-body PET/CT with diagnostic quality (i.e. standard radiation dose) CT. Follow-up was evaluated until 3/2020. RESULTS Thirty-one patients constituted the cohort, 16 (52%) male, median patient age was 53 years (interquartile range: 49-65 years). PET/MR and SCI results were divergent in 19% (95% CI 9-37%) of the cases, with PET/MR leading to management changes in all of them. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/MR was 90 ± 5%, versus 71 ± 8% for SCI. In a pairwise analysis, PET/MR outperformed SCI when compared to the reference standard (p = 0.0412). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest the potential usefulness of PET/MR in the management of oligometastatic CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe S Furtado
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mark Vangel
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James C Cusack
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theodore Hong
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lawrence Blaszkowsky
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Wo
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robin Striar
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - David Groshar
- Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ricciardi Rocco
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Mark A Anderson
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Motaz Qadan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cristina Ferrone
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ganeshan B, Miles K, Afaq A, Punwani S, Rodriguez M, Wan S, Walls D, Hoy L, Khan S, Endozo R, Shortman R, Hoath J, Bhargava A, Hanson M, Francis D, Arulampalam T, Dindyal S, Chen SH, Ng T, Groves A. Texture Analysis of Fractional Water Content Images Acquired during PET/MRI: Initial Evidence for an Association with Total Lesion Glycolysis, Survival and Gene Mutation Profile in Primary Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2715. [PMID: 34072712 PMCID: PMC8199380 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
To assess the capability of fractional water content (FWC) texture analysis (TA) to generate biologically relevant information from routine PET/MRI acquisitions for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Thirty consecutive primary CRC patients (mean age 63.9, range 42-83 years) prospectively underwent FDG-PET/MRI. FWC tumor parametric images generated from Dixon MR sequences underwent TA using commercially available research software (TexRAD). Data analysis comprised (1) identification of functional imaging correlates for texture features (TF) with low inter-observer variability (intraclass correlation coefficient: ICC > 0.75), (2) evaluation of prognostic performance for FWC-TF, and (3) correlation of prognostic imaging signatures with gene mutation (GM) profile. Of 32 FWC-TF with ICC > 0.75, 18 correlated with total lesion glycolysis (TLG, highest: rs = -0.547, p = 0.002). Using optimized cut-off values, five MR FWC-TF identified a good prognostic group with zero mortality (lowest: p = 0.017). For the most statistically significant prognostic marker, favorable prognosis was significantly associated with a higher number of GM per patient (medians: 7 vs. 1.5, p = 0.009). FWC-TA derived from routine PET/MRI Dixon acquisitions shows good inter-operator agreement, generates biological relevant information related to TLG, GM count, and provides prognostic information that can unlock new clinical applications for CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balaji Ganeshan
- Research Department of Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK; (K.M.); (S.P.); (D.W.); (L.H.); (J.H.); (S.-H.C.); (A.G.)
| | - Kenneth Miles
- Research Department of Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK; (K.M.); (S.P.); (D.W.); (L.H.); (J.H.); (S.-H.C.); (A.G.)
| | - Asim Afaq
- Imaging Division, Surgery and Cancer Board, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, University College Hospital (UCH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.A.); (M.R.); (S.W.); (S.K.); (R.E.); (R.S.); (S.D.)
- Department of Radiology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
| | - Shonit Punwani
- Research Department of Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK; (K.M.); (S.P.); (D.W.); (L.H.); (J.H.); (S.-H.C.); (A.G.)
| | - Manuel Rodriguez
- Imaging Division, Surgery and Cancer Board, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, University College Hospital (UCH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.A.); (M.R.); (S.W.); (S.K.); (R.E.); (R.S.); (S.D.)
| | - Simon Wan
- Imaging Division, Surgery and Cancer Board, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, University College Hospital (UCH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.A.); (M.R.); (S.W.); (S.K.); (R.E.); (R.S.); (S.D.)
| | - Darren Walls
- Research Department of Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK; (K.M.); (S.P.); (D.W.); (L.H.); (J.H.); (S.-H.C.); (A.G.)
| | - Luke Hoy
- Research Department of Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK; (K.M.); (S.P.); (D.W.); (L.H.); (J.H.); (S.-H.C.); (A.G.)
| | - Saif Khan
- Imaging Division, Surgery and Cancer Board, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, University College Hospital (UCH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.A.); (M.R.); (S.W.); (S.K.); (R.E.); (R.S.); (S.D.)
| | - Raymond Endozo
- Imaging Division, Surgery and Cancer Board, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, University College Hospital (UCH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.A.); (M.R.); (S.W.); (S.K.); (R.E.); (R.S.); (S.D.)
| | - Robert Shortman
- Imaging Division, Surgery and Cancer Board, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, University College Hospital (UCH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.A.); (M.R.); (S.W.); (S.K.); (R.E.); (R.S.); (S.D.)
| | - John Hoath
- Research Department of Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK; (K.M.); (S.P.); (D.W.); (L.H.); (J.H.); (S.-H.C.); (A.G.)
| | - Aman Bhargava
- Institute of Health Barts and London Medical School, Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), London E1 2AD, UK;
| | - Matthew Hanson
- Division of Cancer and Clinical Support, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens and King George Hospitals, Essex IG3 8YB, UK;
| | - Daren Francis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals, London NW3 2QG, UK;
| | - Tan Arulampalam
- Department of Surgery, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester General Hospital, Colchester CO4 5JL, UK;
| | - Sanjay Dindyal
- Imaging Division, Surgery and Cancer Board, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Foundation Trust, University College Hospital (UCH), London NW1 2BU, UK; (A.A.); (M.R.); (S.W.); (S.K.); (R.E.); (R.S.); (S.D.)
| | - Shih-Hsin Chen
- Research Department of Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK; (K.M.); (S.P.); (D.W.); (L.H.); (J.H.); (S.-H.C.); (A.G.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung 204, Taiwan
| | - Tony Ng
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London (KCL), London WC2R 2LS, UK;
| | - Ashley Groves
- Research Department of Imaging, Division of Medicine, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK; (K.M.); (S.P.); (D.W.); (L.H.); (J.H.); (S.-H.C.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ward RD, Amorim B, Li W, King J, Umutlu L, Groshar D, Harisinghani M, Catalano O. Abdominal and pelvic 18F-FDG PET/MR: a review of current and emerging oncologic applications. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:1236-1248. [PMID: 32949272 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02766-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MR) is an emerging hybrid modality that has shown utility in evaluating abdominal and pelvic disease entities. Together, the high soft tissue contrast and metabolic/functional imaging capabilities make this modality ideal for oncologic imaging in many organ systems. Its clinical utility continues to evolve and future research will help solidify its role in oncologic imaging. In this manuscript, we aim to (1) provide an overview of the various PET/MR systems, describing the strengths and weaknesses of each system, and (2) review the oncologic applications for 18F-FDG PET/MR in the abdomen and pelvis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Ward
- Cleveland Clinic, Department of Abdominal Imaging, 9500 Euclid Ave, L10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Barbara Amorim
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Campinas, Rua Vital Brasil 251, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Weier Li
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Joseph King
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - David Groshar
- Assuta Medical Center, Habrzel 20, 6971028, Tel-Aviv, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Mukesh Harisinghani
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Onofrio Catalano
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Crimì F, Valeggia S, Baffoni L, Stramare R, Lacognata C, Spolverato G, Albertoni L, Spimpolo A, Evangelista L, Zucchetta P, Cecchin D, Pucciarelli S. [18F]FDG PET/MRI in rectal cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2021; 35:281-290. [PMID: 33517562 PMCID: PMC7902586 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01580-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
We conducted a systematic literature review on the use of [18F]FDG PET/MRI for staging/restaging rectal cancer patients with PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, based on the PRISMA criteria. Three authors screened all titles and abstracts and examined the full texts of all the identified relevant articles. Studies containing aggregated or duplicated data, review articles, case reports, editorials, and letters were excluded. Ten reports met the inclusion criteria. Four studies examined T staging and one focused on local recurrences after surgery; the reported sensitivity (94-100%), specificity (73-94%), and accuracy (92-100%) varied only slightly from one study to another. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MRI for N staging were 90-93%, 92-94%, and 42-92%. [18F]FDG PET/MRI detected malignant nodes better than MRI, resulting in treatment change. For M staging, [18F]FDG PET/MRI outperformed [18F]FDG PET/CT and CT in detecting liver metastases, whereas it performed worse for lung metastases. The results of this review suggest that [18F]FDG PET/MRI should be used for rectal cancer restaging after chemoradiotherapy and to select patients for rectum-sparing approaches thanks to its accuracy in T and N staging. For M staging, it should be associated at least with a chest CT scan to rule out lung metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Crimì
- Department of Medicine DIMED, Institute of Radiology, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Silvia Valeggia
- Department of Medicine DIMED, Institute of Radiology, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Luca Baffoni
- Department of Medicine DIMED, Institute of Radiology, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Roberto Stramare
- Department of Medicine DIMED, Institute of Radiology, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Carmelo Lacognata
- Radiology Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences DiSCOG, 1st Surgical Clinic, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Laura Albertoni
- Department of Medicine DIMED, Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Spimpolo
- Department of Medicine DIMED, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Medicine DIMED, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Pietro Zucchetta
- Department of Medicine DIMED, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Diego Cecchin
- Department of Medicine DIMED, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Salvatore Pucciarelli
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences DiSCOG, 1st Surgical Clinic, Padova University Hospital, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
The Role of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the Assessment of Primary Intrahepatic Neoplasms. Acad Radiol 2021; 28:189-198. [PMID: 32111468 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Revised: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the results of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in relation to the histopathologic subtypes and histologic grades of mass-forming primary intrahepatic neoplasms. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) results for 39 patients with histopathologically confirmed primary hepatic neoplasms, 15 with mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and 24 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV) were analyzed in relation to the histopathologic diagnosis and histologic grade, including calculating the sensitivity and specificity of the imaging findings. RESULTS The median SUV of ICC (6.0 [interquartile range, 5-10]) was significantly higher than that of HCC (4.0 [2.62-6.50]) (p = 0.002). An area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.649-0.932) had a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 67% at the best cut-off SUV of 4.41 to differentiate between ICC and HCC. ADC values did not differ significantly between HCCs and ICCs (p = 0.283). Both SUV and ADC values differed significantly between low-grade (well- and moderately differentiated) and high-grade (poorly differentiated) HCCs. Combining ADC and SUV further improved differentiation of low- from high-grade HCCs to a significant level (0.929). The SUV did not differ significantly between ICC histologic grades (p = 0.280), while the ADC differed significantly only between well and poorly differentiated ICCs (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Assessing primary hepatic neoplasms with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI may help to predict tumor grade and differentiate between types of intrahepatic neoplasms.
Collapse
|
23
|
Suarez-Weiss KE, Herold A, Gervais D, Palmer E, Amorim B, King JD, Weier L, Shahein T, Bernstine H, Domachevsk L, Cañamaque LG, Herrmann K, Umutlu L, Groshar D, Catalano OA. Hybrid imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. Radiologe 2021; 60:80-89. [PMID: 32424463 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00661-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Accurate imaging is crucial for lesion detection in abdominal organs, for the noninvasive characterization of focal and diffuse abnormalities, and for surgical planning. To accomplish these tasks, several imaging modalities such as multidetector computer tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are used for abdominal imaging, providing important morphological, functional or metabolic information. More recently, PET/MRI has been gaining attention due to the possibility of combining high-resolution imaging with metabolic imaging. PET/MRI is a novel hybrid imaging technology that in the near future might play a pivotal role in the clinical management of oncologic and inflammatory abdominopelvic diseases. Despite the still limited number of published clinical studies, PET/MRI has been proven to be at least equivalent to PET/CT and to standalone MRI in a variety of oncologic disease. Moreover, in selected and focused clinical studies, it has been proven to outperform current standard of care imaging, for example, in evaluating cholangiocarcinomas, liver metastases, untreated and treated rectal cancer. This has also had an impact on therapeuticmanagement in some studies. Therefore in some institutions, including those of the authors, PET/MRI is becoming the new standard imaging modality in staging treatment-naïve intrahepatic massforming cholangiocarcinomas and prior to complicated hepatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Debra Gervais
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edwin Palmer
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Joseph D King
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Li Weier
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tajmir Shahein
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- University of Naples Parthenope, Naples, Italy.
- Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruits St, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rutegård MK, Båtsman M, Blomqvist L, Rutegård M, Axelsson J, Ljuslinder I, Rutegård J, Palmqvist R, Brännström F, Brynolfsson P, Riklund K. Rectal cancer: a methodological approach to matching PET/MRI to histopathology. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:80. [PMID: 33129352 PMCID: PMC7603757 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00347-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To enable the evaluation of locoregional disease in the on-going RECTOPET (REctal Cancer Trial on PET/MRI/CT) study; a methodology to match mesorectal imaging findings to histopathology is presented, along with initial observations. Methods FDG-PET/MRI examinations were performed in twenty-four consecutively included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. In nine patients, of whom five received neoadjuvant treatment, a postoperative MRI of the surgical specimen was performed. The pathological cut-out was performed according to clinical routine with the addition of photo documentation of each slice of the surgical specimen, meticulously marking the location, size, and type of pathology of each mesorectal finding. This allowed matching individual nodal structures from preoperative MRI, via the specimen MRI, to histopathology. Results Preoperative MRI identified 197 mesorectal nodal structures, of which 92 (47%) could be anatomically matched to histopathology. Of the matched nodal structures identified in both MRI and histopathology, 25% were found to be malignant. These malignant structures consisted of lymph nodes (43%), tumour deposits (48%), and extramural venous invasion (9%). One hundred eleven nodal structures (55%) could not be matched anatomically. Of these, 97 (87%) were benign lymph nodes, and 14 (13%) were malignant nodal structures. Five were malignant lymph nodes, and nine were tumour deposits, all of which had a short axis diameter < 5 mm. Conclusions We designed a method able to anatomically match and study the characteristics of individual mesorectal nodal structures, enabling further research on the impact of each imaging modality. Initial observations suggest that small malignant nodal structures assessed as lymph nodes in MRI often comprise other forms of mesorectal tumour spread. Trial registration Clinical Trials Identifier:NCT03846882.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam K Rutegård
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Malin Båtsman
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jan Axelsson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Ljuslinder
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jörgen Rutegård
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Richard Palmqvist
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Brännström
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Patrik Brynolfsson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Katrine Riklund
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li Y, Mueller LI, Neuhaus JP, Bertram S, Schaarschmidt BM, Demircioglu A, Ludwig JM, Kirchner J, Rischpler C, Herrmann K, Catalano OA, Umutlu L. 18F-FDG PET/MR versus MR Alone in Whole-Body Primary Staging and Restaging of Patients with Rectal Cancer: What Is the Benefit of PET? J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9103163. [PMID: 33003615 PMCID: PMC7599654 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To investigate and compare the diagnostic performance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MR and MR alone in whole-body primary staging and restaging of patients with rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic accuracies of combined reading of PET/MR and MR alone in T, N and M staging against the reference standard. Inter-observer agreement regarding TNM staging was calculated separately for PET/MR and MR alone. Results: A total of 39 studies of 34 patients could be evaluated. Diagnostic accuracies of PET/MR and MR alone were the same in locoregional T staging. For predicting N+ stage, the specificity of combined reading of PET and MR (0.917 and 0.833 for reader 1 and 2, respectively) was slightly higher than MR alone (0.833 and 0.75) without significantly increasing the overall accuracy (0.783 vs. 0.783 and 0.783 vs. 0.739). For detecting distant metastasis, the sensitivities of PET/MR and MR alone were shown equal (1.0 vs. 1.0 and 0.938 vs. 0.938), while the specificity of PET/MR was marginally lower (0.87 vs. 0.913 and 0.826 vs. 0.87). The inter-observer agreements were good to excellent in M (κ = 0.64 and 0.637 for PET/MR and MR alone, p < 0.001) and N staging (0.819 and 0.738, p < 0.001).Conclusion: PET did not yield a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy of PET/MR in TNM staging of rectal cancer, since MR alone facilitated accurate classification of disease stage with good to excellent inter-observer agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Li
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.I.M.); (B.M.S.); (A.D.); (J.M.L.); (L.U.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)201/723-1501; Fax: +49-(0)201/723-1548
| | - Laura Isabel Mueller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.I.M.); (B.M.S.); (A.D.); (J.M.L.); (L.U.)
| | - Jan Peter Neuhaus
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Stefanie Bertram
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.I.M.); (B.M.S.); (A.D.); (J.M.L.); (L.U.)
| | - Aydin Demircioglu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.I.M.); (B.M.S.); (A.D.); (J.M.L.); (L.U.)
| | - Johannes Maximilian Ludwig
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.I.M.); (B.M.S.); (A.D.); (J.M.L.); (L.U.)
| | - Julian Kirchner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany;
| | - Christoph Rischpler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (C.R.); (K.H.)
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (C.R.); (K.H.)
| | - Onofrio Antonio Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (L.I.M.); (B.M.S.); (A.D.); (J.M.L.); (L.U.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
López-Mora DA, Carrió I. Advances And New Indications of PET/CT scan. Med Clin (Barc) 2020; 156:65-67. [PMID: 32620354 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Alfonso López-Mora
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
| | - Ignasi Carrió
- Servicio de Medicina Nuclear. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Queiroz MA, Ortega CD, Ferreira FR, Nahas SC, Cerri GG, Buchpiguel CA. Diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/MRI versus pelvic MRI and thoracic and abdominal CT for detecting synchronous distant metastases in rectal cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:186-195. [PMID: 32561971 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04911-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We compared the diagnostic accuracy of detecting distant metastases for baseline rectal cancer staging between PET/MRI and conventional staging (CS). MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study from November 2016 to April 2018 included 101 rectal adenocarcinoma patients for primary staging. These patients underwent whole-body PET/MRI in addition to CS (pelvic MRI and thoracic and abdominal contrast-enhanced CT). Different readers analyzed CS and PET/MRI findings for primary tumor, nodal, and metastatic staging. The presence, number, and location of metastases were recorded according to the organ involved (non-regional lymph nodes (LNs), liver, lungs, or others). Lesions were defined as positive, negative, or indeterminate. The number of lesions per organ was limited to 10. The McNemar test was used to compare the accuracies. RESULTS PET/MRI exhibited a higher accuracy in detecting metastatic disease than CS in all patients (88.4% vs. 82.6%, p = 0.003) and in patients with extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) (88.9% vs. 85.5%, p = 0.013). The detection rate of PET/MRI was superior to that of CS for all lesions [84.1% vs. 68.9%, p = 0.001], as well as those in the liver (89.2% vs. 84.2%), non-regional LNs (90.0% vs. 36.7%), and lungs (76.4% vs. 66.9%). PET/MRI correctly classified 19/33 (57.5%) patients with indeterminate lesions on CS. CONCLUSION PET/MRI yields higher accuracy than CS for detecting distant synchronous metastases in the baseline staging of patients with rectal cancer and EMVI. PET/MRI exhibited a higher detection rate than CS for identifying non-regional LNs, hepatic lesions, and pulmonary lesions as well as correctly classifying patients with indeterminate lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02537340.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo A Queiroz
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Doutor Ovidio Pires de Campos, 872, Sao Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil.
| | - Cinthia D Ortega
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Felipe R Ferreira
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Sergio C Nahas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Giovanni G Cerri
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Carlos A Buchpiguel
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Rua Doutor Ovidio Pires de Campos, 872, Sao Paulo, SP, 05403-010, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Suarez-Weiss KE, Herold A, Gervais D, Palmer E, Amorim B, King JD, Weier L, Shahein T, Bernstine H, Domachevsk L, Cañamaque LG, Umutlu L, Herrmann K, Groshar D, Catalano OA. [Hybrid imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. German version]. Radiologe 2020; 60:394-404. [PMID: 32232543 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00660-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Accurate imaging is crucial for lesion detection in abdominal organs, for the noninvasive characterization of focal and diffuse abnormalities, and for surgical planning. To accomplish these tasks, several imaging modalities such as multidetector computer tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are used for abdominal imaging, providing important morphological, functional or metabolic information. More recently, PET/MRI has been gaining attention due to the possibility of combining high-resolution imaging with metabolic imaging. PET/MRI is a novel hybrid imaging technology that in the near future might play a pivotal role in the clinical management of oncologic and inflammatory abdominopelvic diseases. Despite the still limited number of published clinical studies, PET/MRI has been proven to be at least equivalent to PET/CT and to stand-alone MRI in a variety of oncologic disease. Moreover, in selected and focused clinical studies, it has been proven to outperform current standard of care imaging, for example, in evaluating cholangiocarcinomas, liver metastases, untreated and treated rectal cancer. This has also had an impact on therapeutic management in some studies. Therefore in some institutions, including those of the authors, PET/MRI is becoming the new standard imaging modality in staging treatment-naïve intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas and prior to complicated hepatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista Elise Suarez-Weiss
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, 02114, Boston MA, USA
| | | | - Debra Gervais
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, 02114, Boston MA, USA
| | - Edwin Palmer
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, 02114, Boston MA, USA
| | | | - Joseph D King
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, 02114, Boston MA, USA
| | - Li Weier
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, 02114, Boston MA, USA
| | - Tajmir Shahein
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, 02114, Boston MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Division of Abdominal Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, 02114, Boston MA, USA. .,University of Naples Parthenope, Neapel, Italien.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hazhirkarzar B, Khoshpouri P, Shaghaghi M, Ghasabeh MA, Pawlik TM, Kamel IR. Current state of the art imaging approaches for colorectal liver metastasis. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2020; 9:35-48. [PMID: 32140477 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.05.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
One of the most common cancers worldwide, colorectal cancer (CRC) has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality and therefore represents an enormous burden to the health care system. Recent advances in CRC treatments have provided patients with primary and metastatic CRC a better long-term prognosis. The presence of synchronous or metachronous metastasis has been associated, however, with worse survival. The most common site of metastatic disease is the liver. A variety of treatment modalities aimed at targeting colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been demonstrated to improve the prognosis of these patients. Loco-regional approaches such as surgical resection and tumor ablation (operative and percutaneous) can provide patients with a chance at long-term disease control and even cure in select populations. Patient selection is important in defining the most suitable treatment option for CRLM in order to provide the best possible survival benefit while avoiding unnecessary interventions and adverse events. Medical imaging plays a crucial role in evaluating the characteristics of CRLMs and disease resectability. Size of tumors, proximity to adjacent anatomical structures, and volume of the unaffected liver are among the most important imaging parameters to determine the suitability of patients for surgical management or other appropriate treatment approaches. We herein provide a comprehensive overview of current-state-of-the-art imaging in the management of CRLM, including staging, treatment planning, response and survival assessment, and post-treatment surveillance. Computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are two most commonly used techniques, which can be used solely or in combination with functional imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI). Providing up-to-date evidence on advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities and tumor assessment criteria, the current review offers a practice guide to assist providers in choosing the most suitable imaging approach for patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bita Hazhirkarzar
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pegah Khoshpouri
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohammadreza Shaghaghi
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ihab R Kamel
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
18F-FDG PET/MRI for Rectal Cancer TNM Restaging After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Initial Experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:310-318. [PMID: 31842163 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE F-FDG-PET/MRI is a novel hybrid techinque that has been recently introduced in oncological imaging, showing promising results. The aim of this study is to assess the value of whole-body F-FDG-PET/MRI for predicting the pathological stage of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. DESIGN This was a prospective observational study. SETTINGS The study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS Thirty-six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (25 male, median age 68.5 years) were prospectively assessed with PET/MRI and thoracoabdominal CT before and after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Twenty-seven patients underwent low anterior or abdominoperineal resection. Nine patients with a complete clinical response underwent organ-preserving treatment (8 local excision and 1 watch-and-wait approach) with >1-year follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES One radiologist evaluated pelvic MRI and CT. A second radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician jointly assessed PET/MRI. The imaging was compared with histology or follow-up (ypT0 vs T ≥1 and ypN0 vs ypN+ categories). Metastases were confirmed with biopsy or a follow-up CT scan at least at 1 year after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of the imaging techniques were calculated using standard formulas. RESULTS The accuracy for ypT staging was 89% and 92%, and the accuracy for ypN was 86% and 92% for MRI and PET/MRI. Compared with CT, PET/MRI correctly diagnosed 4 of 5 metastases, but it did not detect a lung metastatic nodule. In 11% of the patients, the PET/MRI changed the treatment strategy. LIMITATIONS This study is limited by its small sample size. CONCLUSIONS Although the whole-body PET/MRI was more accurate than the pelvic MRI alone for the prediction of tumor and node response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy, the technique performed worse than CT in detecting small lung metastasis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B108. TOMOGRAFÍA POR EMISIÓN DE POSITRONES DE 18F- FLUORODEOXIGLUCOSA (FDG) / RESONANCIA MAGNÉTICA (TEP/RM) PARA ESTADIFICACIÓN TUMORAL TNM DE CÁNCER DEL RECTO DESPUÉS DE LA QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA PREOPERATORIA - EXPERIENCIA INICIAL: Evaluar el valor de la tomografía por emisión de positrones de 18F-fluorodeoxiglucosa / resonancia magnética (TEP/RM) para predecir el estadio patológico del cáncer de recto localmente avanzado después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria.Este fue un estudio prospectivo observacional.El estudio se realizó en un hospital de atención terciaria.Treinta y seis pacientes con cáncer rectal localmente avanzado (25 hombres, edad media de 68.5 años) fueron evaluados prospectivamente con TEP/RM y tomografía computarizada (TC) toraco-abdominal antes y después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria. Veintisiete pacientes se sometieron a resección anterior baja o abdominoperineal. Nueve pacientes con una respuesta clínica completa se sometieron a un tratamiento de preservación de órganos (8 escisión local y 1 un enfoque de observar y esperar) con un seguimiento de> 1 año.Un radiólogo evaluó la RM pélvica y la TC. Un segundo radiólogo y un médico de medicina nuclear evaluaron conjuntamente TEP / RM. La imagen se comparó con la histología o el seguimiento (ypT0 vs T ≥1 y ypN0 vs ypN + categorías). Las metástasis se confirmaron con biopsia o una TC de seguimiento al menos 1 año después de la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria. Los valores de sensibilidad, especificidad y precisión de las técnicas de imagen se calcularon utilizando fórmulas estándar.La precisión para la estadificación ypT fue del 89% y 92%, y la precisión para ypN fue del 86% y 92% para RM y TEP/RM respectivamente. En comparación con la TC, la TEP / RM diagnosticó correctamente 4 de 5 metástasis, pero no detectó un nódulo metastásico pulmonar. En el 11% de los pacientes, la TEP / RM cambió la estrategia de tratamiento.Este estudio está limitado por su pequeño tamaño de muestra.Si bien la TEP / RM de todo el cuerpo fue más precisa que la RM pélvica sola para la predicción de la respuesta tumoral y ganglionar a la quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria, la técnica funcionó peor que la TC para detectar metástasis pulmonares pequeños. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B108.
Collapse
|
31
|
Celebi F, Cindil E, Sarsenov D, Unalan B, Balcı C. Added Value of Contrast Medium in Whole-Body Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison between Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Protocols. Med Princ Pract 2020; 29:54-60. [PMID: 31203290 PMCID: PMC7024881 DOI: 10.1159/000501497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic ability and time efficiency of contrast-enhanced (CE) whole body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) protocol and non-CE (NCE) protocol. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Ninety-three patients with known primary tumors underwent whole-body hybrid FDG PET/MRI during the follow-up of their malignancies with the use of NCE and CE protocols. The NCE PET/MRI protocol consisted of diffusion-weighted (b = 0 and 800 s/mm2) and T1-weighted Turbo Flash in the axial plane and T2-weighted HASTE sequence in the coronal planes (Σ = 25 min). The CE PET/MRI protocol was performed by acquiring axial serial CE 3D FS VIBE images in the upper abdomen, completing the whole body in the late phase in the axial plane (Σ = 30 min). RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference between the total number of lesions detected by the CE protocol (median 2, interquartile range (IQR) 0-14) and that detected by the NCE protocol (median 1, IQR 0-5; p < 0.001). More malignancies were detected in the abdomen (p < 0.001) and brain (p < 0.001) with the CE PET/MRI protocol, whereas no significant difference was present when comparing the 2 protocols in the detection of malignancies in the head and neck (p = 0.356), thorax (p = 0.09), lymph nodes (p = 0.196), and bone (p = 0.414). CONCLUSION The CE FDG PET/MRI protocol enables fast and accurate detection of malignancies compared to the NCE FDG PET/MRI protocol, particularly in the upper abdomen and brain. Diagnostic ability and time efficiency can be increased with the proposed short CE protocol in place of the whole body PET/MRI protocol including both NCE and CE imaging sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filiz Celebi
- Department of Radiology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey,
| | - Emetullah Cindil
- Department of Radiology, Gazi University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dauren Sarsenov
- Department of General Surgery, Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bulent Unalan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cem Balcı
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Lerner School of Medicine, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yoon JH, Lee JM, Chang W, Kang HJ, Bandos A, Lim HJ, Kang SY, Kang KW, Ryoo SB, Jeong SY, Park KJ. Initial M Staging of Rectal Cancer: FDG PET/MRI with a Hepatocyte-specific Contrast Agent versus Contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 2019; 294:310-319. [PMID: 31793850 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundThe performance of PET/MRI in the determination of distant metastases (M stage) in rectal cancer relative to the current practice with contrast material-enhanced CT is largely unknown.PurposeTo compare the staging of clinical M stage rectal cancer with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MRI (including dedicated liver and rectal MRI) to that of chest and abdominopelvic CT and dedicated rectal MRI.Materials and MethodsFrom January 2016 to August 2017, patients with newly diagnosed advanced mid to low rectal cancers were recruited for this prospective study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT0265170). Participants underwent both FDG PET/MRI with dedicated liver and rectal MRI and chest and abdominopelvic CT (the standard-of-care protocol) within 3 weeks of each other. Thereafter, M stage assessment performance was determined by using findings from 6-month clinical follow-up or biopsy as the reference standard. Performance was compared between protocols. Agreement in M stage classification was also assessed. Nonparametric statistical analyses were performed, and P < .05 indicated a significance difference.ResultsSeventy-one participants (28 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 61 years ± 9; age range, 39-79 years) were enrolled. The M stage could not be determined with the standard-of-care protocol in 22 of the 71 participants (31%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.5%, 43.1%) because of indeterminate lesions. However, among these participants, PET/MRI correctly helped identify all 14 (100%; 95% CI: 76.8%, 100%) without metastases and seven of eight (88%; 95% CI: 47.4%, 99.7%) who were later confirmed to have metastases. PET/MRI showed high specificity for ruling out metastatic disease compared with the standard-of-care protocol (98% [54 of 55 participants] vs 72% [40 of 55 participants], respectively; P < .001), without increasing the number of participants with missed metastasis (6% [one of 16 participants] vs 6% [one of 16 participants]; P > .99).ConclusionPET/MRI with dedicated rectal and liver MRI can facilitate the staging work-up of newly diagnosed advanced rectal cancers by helping assess indeterminate lesions, metastases, and incidental findings better than contrast-enhanced CT, obviating for additional imaging work-up.© RSNA, 2019Online supplemental material is available for this article.Clinical trial registration no. NCT02651701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Hee Yoon
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Won Chang
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Hyo-Jin Kang
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Andriy Bandos
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Hyun-Ju Lim
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Seo Yeong Kang
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Keon Wook Kang
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Seung-Bum Ryoo
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Seung-Yong Jeong
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| | - Kyu Joo Park
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.), Nuclear Medicine (S.Y.K., K.W.K.), and Surgery (S.B.R., S.Y.J., K.J.P.), Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.H.Y., J.M.L., H.J.K.); Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea (W.C.); Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center Korea, Goyang, Republic of Korea (H.J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hope TA, Kassam Z, Loening A, McNamara MM, Paspulati R. The use of PET/MRI for imaging rectal cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:3559-3568. [PMID: 31201431 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02089-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Combined PET/MRI is a proposed imaging modality for rectal cancer, leveraging the advantages of MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Rectal cancer PET/MRI protocols typically include dedicated pelvis bed positions utilizing small field-of-view T2-weighted imaging. For staging of the primary tumor, PET/MRI can help delineate the extent of tumor better as well as the extent of tumor beyond the muscularis propria. PET uptake may help characterize small lymph nodes, and the use of hepatobiliary phase imaging can improve the detection of small hepatic metastases. The most beneficial aspect of PET/MRI may be in treatment response, although current data are limited on how to combine PET and MRI data in this setting. Limitations of PET/MRI include the inability to detect small pulmonary nodules and issues related to attenuation correction, although the development of new attenuation correction techniques may address this issue. Overall PET/MRI can improve the staging of rectal cancer, although this potential has yet to be fulfilled.
Collapse
|
34
|
Yolcu YU, Lehman VT, Bhatti AUR, Goyal A, Alvi MA, Bydon M. Use of Hybrid Imaging Techniques in Diagnosis of Facet Joint Arthropathy: A Narrative Review of Three Modalities. World Neurosurg 2019; 134:201-210. [PMID: 31655232 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Facet joint osteoarthritis/arthropathy of the spine is a common cause of back and neck pain that frequently overlaps clinically with other diseases of the spine. Because of the possible overlap, it is crucial to have an accurate diagnostic strategy, especially when determining the management approach. Various strategies have been suggested and adopted, with several these still being used in clinics. Over the years, because of the disadvantages of single-modality imaging methods (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography), the interest in radiologic examination started to move toward hybrid imaging techniques. Although the data are mixed, many initial studies have shown promise. However, there are relatively few data with comparative medial branch blocks, and further investigation is needed. Given the advantages and disadvantages of these new techniques, the imaging results have to be interpreted within clinical context and with consideration of the current state of knowledge in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yagiz Ugur Yolcu
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Vance T Lehman
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Atiq Ur Rehman Bhatti
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anshit Goyal
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mohammed Ali Alvi
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Çelebi F. What is the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI in the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Patients with Breast Cancer? Eur J Breast Health 2019; 15:213-216. [PMID: 31620678 DOI: 10.5152/ejbh.2019.4885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of bone metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Materials and methods From August 2018 to January 2019, a total of 23 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer underwent whole-body hybrid 18F-FDG -PET/MRI for initial staging and follow-up of their malignancies. The number of the bone metastasis was recorded for each patient. The total 18F-FDG-PET/MRI protocol was compared with PET only and the contrast enhanced fused (CE) component for the detection of bone metastasis. Results Eight (26%) of 23 patients had bone metastasis. Bone metastases were dominantly localized in the spine (63%) and pelvis (25%). In terms of the total number of detected bone metastasis, there was a statistically significant difference between 18F-FDG-PET/MRI (mean 3.57; median 0; range, 0-2) and PET only component (mean 2.87; median 0; range, 0-1) (p=0.026), but no statistically significant difference was detected between 18F-FDG-PET/MRI and whole-body CE MRI (mean 3.43; median 0; range 0-2) (p=0.083). Conclusion Whole-body hybrid 18F-FDG-PET/MRI is superior to PET component only, but no statistically significant difference between hybrid 18F-FDG-PET/MRI and whole-body CE MRI is found for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filiz Çelebi
- Department of Radiology, Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ferri V, Vicente Lopez E, Quijano Collazo Y, Caruso R, Duran Gimenez Rico H, Ielpo B, Diaz Reques E, Fabra Cabrera I, Malavè Cardozo L, Isernia R, Pinna E, Plaza Hernandezv C, Garcerant M, Garcia Cañamaques L, Perez Dueñas V. Quantitative analysis of 18-FDG-PET/MRI to assess pathological complete response following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. A prospective preliminary study. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1246-1249. [PMID: 31144557 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1622774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Ferri
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Vicente Lopez
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Riccardo Caruso
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Benedetto Ielpo
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo Diaz Reques
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Fabra Cabrera
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Malavè Cardozo
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Roberta Isernia
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eva Pinna
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Marjorie Garcerant
- Division of Nuclear Medicin, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Amorim BJ, Hong TS, Blaszkowsky LS, Ferrone CR, Berger DL, Bordeianou LG, Ricciardi R, Clark JW, Ryan DP, Wo JY, Qadan M, Vangel M, Umutlu L, Groshar D, Cañamaques LG, Gervais DA, Mahmood U, Rosen BR, Catalano OA. Clinical impact of PET/MR in treated colorectal cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:2260-2269. [PMID: 31359108 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04449-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate if PET/MR induced management changes versus standard of care imaging (SCI) in treated colorectal cancer patients. The secondary aim was to assess the staging performance of PET/MR and of SCI versus the final oncologic stage. METHODS Treated CRC patients who underwent PET/MR with 18F-FDG and SCI between January 2016 and October 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Their medical records were evaluated to ascertain if PET/MR had impacted on their clinical management versus SCI. The final oncologic stage, as reported in the electronic medical record, was considered the true stage of disease. RESULTS A total of 39 patients who underwent 42 PET/MR studies were included, mean age 56.7 years (range 39-75 years), 26 males, and 13 females. PET/MR changed clinical management 15/42 times (35.7%, standard error ± 7.4%); these 15 changes in management were due to upstaging in 9/42 (21.5%) and downstaging in 6/42 (14.2%). The differences in management prompted by SCI versus PET/MR were statistically significant, and PET/MR outperformed SCI (P value < 0.001; odds ratio = 2.8). In relation to the secondary outcome, PET/MR outperformed the SCI in accuracy of oncologic staging (P value = 0.016; odds ratio = 4.6). CONCLUSIONS PET/MR is a promising imaging tool in the evaluation of treated CRC and might change the management in these patients. However, multicenter prospective studies with larger patient samples are required in order to confirm these preliminary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara J Amorim
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Nuclear Medicine, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David L Berger
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liliana G Bordeianou
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rocco Ricciardi
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David P Ryan
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Vangel
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - David Groshar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel Aviv, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Debra A Gervais
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Umar Mahmood
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. .,Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Radiology, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rutegård MK, Båtsman M, Axelsson J, Brynolfsson P, Brännström F, Rutegård J, Ljuslinder I, Blomqvist L, Palmqvist R, Rutegård M, Riklund K. PET/MRI and PET/CT hybrid imaging of rectal cancer - description and initial observations from the RECTOPET (REctal Cancer trial on PET/MRI/CT) study. Cancer Imaging 2019; 19:52. [PMID: 31337428 PMCID: PMC6651930 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-019-0237-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The role of hybrid imaging using 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer is largely unknown. To investigate this, the RECTOPET (REctal Cancer Trial on PET/MRI/CT) study has been launched with the aim to assess staging and restaging of primary rectal cancer. This report presents the study workflow and the initial experiences of the impact of PET/CT on staging and management of the first patients included in the RECTOPET study. Methods This prospective cohort study, initiated in September 2016, is actively recruiting patients from Region Västerbotten in Sweden. This pilot study includes patients recruited and followed up until December 2017. All patients had a biopsy-verified rectal adenocarcinoma and underwent a minimum of one preoperative FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI examination. These patients were referred to the colorectal cancer multidisciplinary team meeting at Umeå University Hospital. All available data were evaluated when making management recommendations. The clinical course was noted and changes consequent to PET imaging were described; surgical specimens underwent dedicated MRI for anatomical matching between imaging and histopathology. Results Twenty-four patients have so far been included in the study. Four patients were deemed unresectable, while 19 patients underwent or were scheduled for surgery; one patient was enrolled in a watch-and-wait programme after restaging. Consequent to taking part in the study, two patients were upstaged to M1 disease: one patient was diagnosed with a solitary hepatic metastasis detected using PET/CT and underwent metastasectomy prior to rectal cancer surgery, while one patient with a small, but metabolically active, lung nodulus experienced no change of management. PET/MRI did not contribute to any recorded change in patient management. Conclusions The RECTOPET study investigating the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI for preoperative staging of primary rectal cancer patients will provide novel data that clarify the value of adding hybrid to conventional imaging, and the role of PET/CT versus PET/MRI. Trial registration NCT03846882.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam K Rutegård
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Malin Båtsman
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jan Axelsson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Patrik Brynolfsson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Brännström
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jörgen Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Ljuslinder
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Imaging and Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Richard Palmqvist
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Martin Rutegård
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Katrine Riklund
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Umeå University, SE-901 85, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chen S, Hu P, Gu Y, Pang L, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Meng X, Cao T, Liu X, Fan Z, Shi H. Impact of patient comfort on diagnostic image quality during PET/MR exam: A quantitative survey study for clinical workflow management. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:184-192. [PMID: 31207077 PMCID: PMC6612685 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2018] [Revised: 05/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background PET/MR is transferring from a powerful scientific research tool to an imaging modality in clinical routine practice. Whole body PET/MR screening usually takes 30–50 minutes to finish, during which a few factors might induce patient discomfort and further cause degraded image quality. The aim of this report is to investigate the patients' perception of the imaging procedure and its correlation with image quality. Methods One hundred and twenty patients (63 males and 57 females, average age = 51.3 years, range 22–70 years) who had been diagnosed with cancer or had previous history of cancer were recruited and scanned with a simultaneous PET/MR system. A questionnaire was given to all patients retrospectively after the PET/MR scan, which has nine questions to assess patients' feeling of the scan on a Likert scale scoring system (1–5, 1 as most satisfied). All PET/MR images were also visually examined by two experts independently to evaluate the quality of the images. Six body locations were assessed and each location was evaluated also with a Likert scale scoring system (1–5, 5 as the best quality). Mann–Whitney Utest was used for statistical analysis to check if there is significant correlation between image quality and patient perceptions. Results With a total of 120 patients, 118 questionnaires were filled and returned for analysis. The patients’ characteristics were summarized in Table 4. The statistics of the patients’ perception in the questionnaire were illustrated in Tables 5–7. Statistical significant correlations were found between MR image quality and patients’ characteristics/perception. Conclusion Our results show that PET/MR scanning is generally safe and comfortable for most of the patients. Statistical analysis does not support the hypothesis that bad patient’s perception leads to degraded image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuguang Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Pengcheng Hu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yusen Gu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lifang Pang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zheng Zhang
- United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiqian Zhang
- United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaolin Meng
- United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Tuoyu Cao
- United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Liu
- Center for Certification an Evaluation, Shanghai Food and Drug Administration, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhijin Fan
- Center for Certification an Evaluation, Shanghai Food and Drug Administration, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongcheng Shi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
PET/MRI for Gastrointestinal Imaging: Current Clinical Status and Future Prospects. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2018; 47:691-714. [PMID: 30115444 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2018.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) has become the standard of care for the initial staging and subsequent treatment response assessment for numerous gastrointestinal malignancies. However, it is often supplemented by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local tumor staging. Hybrid PET/MRI scanners, which acquire PET data and MRI data simultaneously, have the potential to provide accurate whole-body staging in a single examination. Furthermore, to address certain limitations of FDG, many new PET tracers have been developed to probe distinctive aspects of tumor biology.
Collapse
|
41
|
Catalano O, Kilcoyne A, Signore A, Mahmood U, Rosen B. Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Applications of PET/Computed Tomography and PET/MR Imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2018; 56:821-834. [PMID: 30119776 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This article discusses the role of PET/CT and PET/MR imaging in the evaluation of inflammatory and malignant disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract. This includes a review of the current literature and a discussion of new and emerging research.
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine if extended PET acquisition times in the pelvis during PET/MRI increase detection rates of potentially metastatic lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of California, San Francisco. Twenty-two patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer underwent imaging via simultaneous 3-T time-of-flight PET/MRI, with seven undergoing two separate PET/MRI examinations, for a total of 29 studies. Each examination included both a whole-body PET/MRI and a dedicated pelvic PET/MRI with both 3- and 15-minute PET acquisitions for the pelvis. Three radiologists interpreted each examination with PET only, MRI only, then combined PET and MRI examinations, using all available images. Additionally, the 3- and 15-minute PET acquisitions of the pelvis were reviewed separately by a single radiologist. RESULTS A total of 94 lymph nodes were identified as abnormal on PET, all with MRI anatomic correlates. Of these, 37 (39.4%) were seen only on the dedicated 15-minute acquisition. Fifty-seven (60.6%) nodes measured 5 mm or less, including 29 (30.9%) seen only on the 15-minute acquisition. Thirty-one (33.0%) nodes measured 5.1-10 mm, including eight (25.8%) seen only on the 15-minute acquisition. Of the 17 subjects imaged for initial staging, 11 (64.7%) were upstaged as a result of the increased PET acquisition time (10 from N1 to N2 and one from N0 to N1). CONCLUSION Longer PET acquisition times during PET/MRI for rectal cancer increases the number of FDG-avid lymph nodes detected without increasing scan time.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to provide an update on clinical PET/MRI, including current and developing clinical indications and technical developments. CONCLUSION PET/MRI is evolving rapidly, transitioning from a predominant research focus to exciting clinical practice. Key technical obstacles have been overcome, and further technical advances promise to herald significant advancements in image quality. Further optimization of protocols to address challenges posed by this hybrid modality will ensure the long-term success of PET/MRI.
Collapse
|
44
|
Zaccagna F, Grist JT, Deen SS, Woitek R, Lechermann LMT, McLean MA, Basu B, Gallagher FA. Hyperpolarized carbon-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging: a clinical tool for studying tumour metabolism. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170688. [PMID: 29293376 PMCID: PMC6190784 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 12/13/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Glucose metabolism in tumours is reprogrammed away from oxidative metabolism, even in the presence of oxygen. Non-invasive imaging techniques can probe these alterations in cancer metabolism providing tools to detect tumours and their response to therapy. Although Positron Emission Tomography with (18F)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG PET) is an established clinical tool to probe cancer metabolism, it has poor spatial resolution and soft tissue contrast, utilizes ionizing radiation and only probes glucose uptake and phosphorylation and not further downstream metabolism. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) has the capability to non-invasively detect and distinguish molecules within tissue but has low sensitivity and can only detect selected nuclei. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP) is a technique which greatly increases the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) achieved with MR by significantly increasing nuclear spin polarization and this method has now been translated into human imaging. This review provides a brief overview of this process, also termed Hyperpolarized Carbon-13 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (HP 13C-MRSI), its applications in preclinical imaging, an outline of the current human trials that are ongoing, as well as future potential applications in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fulvio Zaccagna
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - James T Grist
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Surrin S Deen
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ramona Woitek
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Mary A McLean
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bristi Basu
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
García-Figueiras R, Baleato-González S, Padhani AR, Luna-Alcalá A, Marhuenda A, Vilanova JC, Osorio-Vázquez I, Martínez-de-Alegría A, Gómez-Caamaño A. Advanced Imaging Techniques in Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer. Radiographics 2018; 38:740-765. [PMID: 29676964 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Imaging techniques are clinical decision-making tools in the evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this article is to discuss the potential of recent advances in imaging for diagnosis, prognosis, therapy planning, and assessment of response to treatment of CRC. Recent developments and new clinical applications of conventional imaging techniques such as virtual colonoscopy, dual-energy spectral computed tomography, elastography, advanced computing techniques (including volumetric rendering techniques and machine learning), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based magnetization transfer, and new liver imaging techniques, which may offer additional clinical information in patients with CRC, are summarized. In addition, the clinical value of functional and molecular imaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted MR imaging, dynamic contrast material-enhanced imaging, blood oxygen level-dependent imaging, lymphography with contrast agents, positron emission tomography with different radiotracers, and MR spectroscopy is reviewed, and the advantages and disadvantages of these modalities are evaluated. Finally, the future role of imaging-based analysis of tumor heterogeneity and multiparametric imaging, the development of radiomics and radiogenomics, and future challenges for imaging of patients with CRC are discussed. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto García-Figueiras
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Sandra Baleato-González
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Antonio Luna-Alcalá
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Ana Marhuenda
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Joan C Vilanova
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Iria Osorio-Vázquez
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Anxo Martínez-de-Alegría
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.F., S.B.G., I.O.V., A.M.d.A.) and Radiation Oncology (A.G.C.), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, England (A.R.P.); Health Time, Jaén, Spain (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (A.L.A.); Department of Radiology, IVO (Instituto Valenciano de Oncología), Valencia, Spain (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona and IDI, Girona, Spain (J.C.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sailer AM, Bakers FC, Daemen JW, Vöö S. 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the diagnosis of an infected aortic aneurysm. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2018; 8:S208-S211. [PMID: 29850433 DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.08.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
We report a case where an integrated whole body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is performed in the diagnostic work-up of a saccular aortic aneurysm. The integrated whole body 18F-FDG PET/MRI study answered all relevant diagnostic questions, clearly marking an infected aortic aneurysm, depicting the extent of the infected area in relation to the aortic branch vessels, and indicating the aortic lesion as the primary site of infection. The patient was successfully treated by open type V TAAA repair and pericardial graft replacement. Aortic wall infection was proven in cultures of the surgical specimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Sailer
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Frans C Bakers
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan W Daemen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Vöö
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ehman EC, Johnson GB, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Cha S, Leynes AP, Larson PEZ, Hope TA. PET/MRI: Where might it replace PET/CT? J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46:1247-1262. [PMID: 28370695 PMCID: PMC5623147 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simultaneous positron emission tomography and MRI (PET/MRI) is a technology that combines the anatomic and quantitative strengths of MR imaging with physiologic information obtained from PET. PET and computed tomography (PET/CT) performed in a single scanning session is an established technology already in widespread and accepted use worldwide. Given the higher cost and complexity of operating and interpreting the studies obtained on a PET/MRI system, there has been question as to which patients would benefit most from imaging with PET/MRI versus PET/CT. In this article, we compare PET/MRI with PET/CT, detail the applications for which PET/MRI has shown promise and discuss impediments to future adoption. It is our hope that future work will prove the benefit of PET/MRI to specific groups of patients, initially those in which PET/CT and MRI are already performed, leveraging simultaneity and allowing for greater degrees of multiparametric evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1247-1262.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric C. Ehman
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Andrew Palmera Leynes
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Peder Eric Zufall Larson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Thomas A. Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Comparative characteristics of quantitative indexes for 18F-FDG uptake and metabolic volume in sequentially obtained PET/MRI and PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun 2017; 38:333-339. [DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
49
|
Catalano OA, Coutinho AM, Sahani DV, Vangel MG, Gee MS, Hahn PF, Witzel T, Soricelli A, Salvatore M, Catana C, Mahmood U, Rosen BR, Gervais D. Colorectal cancer staging: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MR. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:1141-1151. [PMID: 27891551 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0985-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Correct staging is imperative for colorectal cancer (CRC) since it influences both prognosis and management. Several imaging methods are used for this purpose, with variable performance. Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance (PET/MR) is an innovative imaging technique recently employed for clinical application. The present study was undertaken to compare the staging accuracy of whole-body positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) with whole-body PET/MR in patients with both newly diagnosed and treated colorectal cancer. METHODS Twenty-six patients, who underwent same day whole-body (WB) PET/CT and WB-PET/MR, were evaluated. PET/CT and PET/MR studies were interpreted by consensus by a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician. Correlations with prior imaging and follow-up studies were used as the reference standard. Correct staging was compared between methods using McNemar's Chi square test. RESULTS The two methods were in agreement and correct for 18/26 (69%) patients, and in agreement and incorrect for one patient (3.8%). PET/MR and PET/CT stages for the remaining 7/26 patients (27%) were discordant, with PET/MR staging being correct in all seven cases. PET/MR significantly outperformed PET/CT overall for accurate staging (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION PET/MR outperformed PET/CT in CRC staging. PET/MR might allow accurate local and distant staging of CRC patients during both at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University Medical School, 149 Thirteenth Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Artur M Coutinho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of São Paulo Medical School (FMUSP) and Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, 01308-050, Brazil
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Mark G Vangel
- Department of Radiology, MGH Biostatistics Center and MGH Martinos Center, Harvard University Medical School, 149 Thirteenth Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - Michael S Gee
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Department of Radiology, Pediatric Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Peter F Hahn
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Thomas Witzel
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University Medical School, 149 Thirteenth Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - Andrea Soricelli
- Department of Radiology, University of Naples Parthenope, Via F. Acton 38, 80143, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Salvatore
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, SDN IRCCS, Via Gianturco 113, 80143, Naples, Italy
| | - Ciprian Catana
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University Medical School, 149 Thirteenth Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - Umar Mahmood
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University Medical School, 149 Thirteenth Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University Medical School, 149 Thirteenth Street, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - Debra Gervais
- Department of Radiology, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Matthews R, Choi M. Clinical Utility of Positron Emission Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET-MRI) in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Diagnostics (Basel) 2016; 6:diagnostics6030035. [PMID: 27618106 PMCID: PMC5039569 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics6030035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2016] [Revised: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 08/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Anatomic imaging utilizing both CT (computed tomography) and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) limits the assessment of cancer metastases in lymph nodes and distant organs while functional imaging like PET (positron emission tomography) scan has its limitation in spatial resolution capacity. Hybrid imaging utilizing PET-CT and PET-MRI are novel imaging modalities that are changing the current landscape in cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment response. MRI has shown to have higher sensitivity in soft tissue, head and neck pathology, and pelvic disease, as well as, detecting small metastases in the liver and bone compared to CT. Combining MRI with PET allows for detection of metastases that may have been missed with current imaging modalities. In this review, we will examine the clinical utility of FDG PET-MRI in the diagnosis and staging of gastrointestinal cancers with focus on esophageal, stomach, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. We will also explore its role in treatment response and future directions associated with it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Matthews
- Department of Radiology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
| | - Minsig Choi
- Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
| |
Collapse
|