1
|
Crim J. Bone radiographs: sometimes overlooked, often difficult to read, and still important. Skeletal Radiol 2024; 53:1687-1698. [PMID: 37914896 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04498-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Crim
- University of Missouri at Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salih SG, Osman AO, Alkatheeri AM, Hassaneen MB. Unexpected Artifact on 99mTc-Methylene Diphosphonate Bone Scintigraphy. J Nucl Med Technol 2024:jnmt.124.267795. [PMID: 39019574 DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.124.267795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Asymmetric hot spots in the axial skeleton on bone scintigraphy may confound diagnosis. We describe an unexpected artifact of 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate near the breast in a 55-y-old woman with breast cancer. The initial whole-body bone scintigraphy revealed a solitary focal lesion in the anterior ribs on the left side. After careful tracking, we determined that this hot spot originated from the adhesive bandage. The patient had placed it in her left front pocket after removing it from the injection site. She was rescanned after the bandage had been removed from her pocket.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suliman G Salih
- Department of Radiography and Medical Imaging, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates; and
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, University of Gezira, Sudan
| | - Abdelbagi O Osman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, University of Gezira, Sudan
| | - Ajnas M Alkatheeri
- Department of Radiography and Medical Imaging, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates; and
| | - Mohamed B Hassaneen
- Department of Radiography and Medical Imaging, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates; and
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bone and soft tissue tumors at the borderlands of malignancy. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:379-392. [PMID: 35767018 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04099-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
This review examines findings of musculoskeletal neoplasms whose equivocal imaging and/or histopathologic features make it difficult to determine if they will show aggressive behavior. We include both intermediate tumors as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO), and a single low-grade malignancy, low-grade central osteosarcoma, which mimics a benign lesion on imaging and histology. Intermediate tumors are a broad category and are subdivided into tumors that have risk of local recurrence only, and ones that have a risk of distant limb and pulmonary metastases. Difficult intermediate musculoskeletal lesions include atypical cartilaginous tumor/grade 1 chondrosarcoma, atypical lipomatous tumor/grade 1 liposarcoma, and solitary fibrous tumor. We review diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, and recommendations for surveillance.
Collapse
|
4
|
Beyond the abdominal and pelvic cavity: abdominal wall and spinal "Aunt Minnies". Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1479-1504. [PMID: 36790455 PMCID: PMC9930021 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03830-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Abdominal wall and spinal soft tissue findings are frequently encountered on CT or MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. Many of these entities have specific imaging findings, for which a definitive diagnosis can be made without the need for further work up. These abdominal wall and spinal findings may be diagnostically challenging for sub-specialized abdominal radiologists who are unfamiliar with their appearance and appropriate management. This review article describes and illustrates pathognomonic or characteristic abdominal wall and spinal pathologies, which reside outside the abdominopelvic cavity. The cases selected all have findings that allow a confident diagnosis without further imaging or intervention. The cases presented include myonecrosis, intramuscular abscess, myositis, iliopsoas bursitis, Morel-Lavallée lesion, hydrocele of canal of Nuck, Klippel Trenaunay Weber syndrome, neurofibroma with target sign, perineural cysts, filum terminale lipoma, calvarial bone flap, transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap, liposuction, and hidradenitis suppurativa, among others. Although not all-encompassing, this paper will help abdominal radiologists to accurately diagnose a variety of abdominal and pelvic extra-cavitary soft tissue pathologies by identifying key radiologic findings.
Collapse
|
5
|
Jen A, Kochkodan-Self J, Mandell JC. A Retrospective Analysis of Sternal Lesions Detected on Breast MRI in Patients Without History of Cancer. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2023; 5:48-55. [PMID: 38416958 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the imaging characteristics and stability over time of sternal lesions identified on breast MRI in patients without history of cancer. METHODS An IRB-approved retrospective analysis of all breast MRIs performed at our institution from September 1, 2017 to December 1, 2021 that included one of several key words related to the sternum. Studies with history of non-dermatologic malignancy including breast cancer, absence of a true sternal lesion, or presence of symptoms during the examination were excluded. Imaging was reviewed for size, distribution, signal characteristics, and presence of contrast enhancement, perilesional edema, periosteal edema, or intralesional fat. Available comparison imaging, clinical history, and follow-up recommendations were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize lesion data. RESULTS Of 60 lesions included from 60 patients, 40 lesions with more than two years of comparison imaging were either stable or decreased in size and none demonstrated change in signal characteristics. The majority of these presumed benign lesions demonstrated hypointense signal on T1-weighted sequences (21/40, 52.5%), hyperintense signal on fluid-sensitive sequences (33/40, 82.5%), contrast enhancement (32/40, 80.0%), and absence of clear intralesional fat (29/40, 72.5%). One patient who did not have comparison imaging was diagnosed with malignancy (multiple myeloma) eight months following their MRI. This lesion demonstrated uniquely diffuse and heterogeneous enhancement but did not undergo biopsy. CONCLUSION Sternal lesions in women without history of non-dermatologic malignancy have a very low likelihood of malignancy. Common imaging characteristics of the presumed benign lesions can inform imaging recommendations when incidental sternal lesions are discovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Jen
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeanne Kochkodan-Self
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jacob C Mandell
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pinto E, Penha D, Hochhegger B, Monaghan C, Marchiori E, Taborda-Barata L, Irion K. Incidental chest findings on coronary CT angiography: a pictorial essay and management proposal. JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA : PUBLICACAO OFICIAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE PNEUMOLOGIA E TISILOGIA 2022; 48:e20220015. [PMID: 35584528 PMCID: PMC9064655 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20220015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Many health systems have been using coronary CT angiography (CCTA) as a first-line examination for ischaemic heart disease patients in various countries. The rising number of CCTA examinations has led to a significant increase in the number of reported incidental extracardiac findings, mainly in the chest. Pulmonary nodules are the most common incidental findings on CCTA scans, as there is a substantial overlap of risk factors between the population seeking to exclude ischaemic heart disease and those at risk of developing lung cancer (i.e., advanced age and smoking habits). However, most incidental findings are clinically insignificant and actively pursuing them could be cost-prohibitive and submit the patient to unnecessary and potentially harmful examinations. Furthermore, there is little consensus regarding when to report or actively exclude these findings and how to manage them, that is, when to trigger an alert or to immediately refer the patient to a pulmonologist, a thoracic surgeon or a multidisciplinary team. This pictorial essay discusses the current literature on this topic and is illustrated with a review of CCTA scans. We also propose a checklist organised by organ and system, recommending actions to raise awareness of pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, cardiologists and radiologists regarding the most significant and actionable incidental findings on CCTA scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erique Pinto
- . Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Diana Penha
- . Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.,. Imaging Department, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Bruno Hochhegger
- . Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| | - Colin Monaghan
- . Imaging Department, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Edson Marchiori
- . Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil.,. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói (RJ) Brasil
| | - Luís Taborda-Barata
- . Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Klaus Irion
- . Imaging Department, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
García Cañamaque L, Field CA, Furtado FS, Plaza DE Las Heras I, Husseini JS, Balza R, Jarraya M, Catalano OA, Mitjavila Casanovas M. Contribution of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in musculoskeletal malignancies. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2022; 66:3-14. [PMID: 34881853 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.21.03432-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a promising hybrid imaging technique for evaluating musculoskeletal malignancies. Both technologies, independently are useful for evaluating this type of tumors. PET/MR has great potential combining metabolic and functional imaging PET with soft tissue contrast and multiparametric sequences of MR. In this paper we review the existing literature and discuss the different protocols, new available radiotracers to conclude with the scarce evidence available the most useful/probable indications of the PET MR for the for musculoskeletal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina García Cañamaque
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Madrid Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain -
| | - Caroline A Field
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Madrid Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Felipe S Furtado
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jad S Husseini
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rene Balza
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mohamed Jarraya
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chang CY, Garner HW, Ahlawat S, Amini B, Bucknor MD, Flug JA, Khodarahmi I, Mulligan ME, Peterson JJ, Riley GM, Samim M, Lozano-Calderon SA, Wu JS. Society of Skeletal Radiology- white paper. Guidelines for the diagnostic management of incidental solitary bone lesions on CT and MRI in adults: bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS). Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:1743-1764. [PMID: 35344076 PMCID: PMC9283187 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04022-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present algorithms for the diagnostic management of solitary bone lesions incidentally encountered on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MRI) in adults. Based on review of the current literature and expert opinion, the Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards Committee of the Society of Skeletal Radiology (SSR) proposes a bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) for incidentally encountered solitary bone lesions on CT and MRI with four possible diagnostic management recommendations (Bone-RADS1, leave alone; Bone-RADS2, perform different imaging modality; Bone-RADS3, perform follow-up imaging; Bone-RADS4, biopsy and/or oncologic referral). Two algorithms for CT based on lesion density (lucent or sclerotic/mixed) and two for MRI allow the user to arrive at a specific Bone-RADS management recommendation. Representative cases are provided to illustrate the usability of the algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jim S. Wu
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoffman RJ, Stanborough RO, Garner HW. Diagnostic Imaging Approach to Solitary Bone Lesions. Semin Roentgenol 2022; 57:241-251. [DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Cheung H, Yechoor A, Behnia F, Abadi AB, Khodarahmi I, Soltanolkotabi M, Shafiei M, Chalian M. Common Skeletal Neoplasms and Nonneoplastic Lesions at 18F-FDG PET/CT. Radiographics 2021; 42:250-267. [PMID: 34919467 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Numerous primary and metastatic osseous lesions and incidental osseous findings are encountered at fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. These lesions show varying degrees of FDG uptake. Malignancies are generally more FDG avid than are benign lesions, but many exceptions exist. Although aggressive lesions tend to be more FDG avid than nonaggressive lesions, this concept holds true particularly for lesions of the same histologic subtype. In addition, some benign osseous processes such as Paget disease have variable degrees of FDG avidity on the basis of disease metabolic activity. This creates a diagnostic dilemma for radiologists and clinicians, especially in patients with known malignancies, and can result in unnecessary diagnostic imaging or interventions for incidental osseous lesions. Evaluation of morphologic CT characteristics of osseous lesions at FDG PET/CT can be a valuable adjunct to metabolic analysis to further characterize lesions, enhance diagnostic and staging accuracy, and avoid unnecessary invasive biopsy procedures. The authors review the common primary and metastatic bone lesions at FDG PET/CT, with an emphasis on morphologic CT assessment of lesions to help narrow the differential diagnosis. Imaging manifestations of common incidental nonneoplastic bone lesions at FDG PET/CT are discussed to provide information on differentiation of these lesions from osseous neoplasms. The guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for common primary osseous malignancies are also summarized. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoiwan Cheung
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention (H.C., A.Y., A.B.A., M. Shafiei, M.C.) and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105; Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (I.K.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M. Soltanolkotabi)
| | - Alekhya Yechoor
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention (H.C., A.Y., A.B.A., M. Shafiei, M.C.) and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105; Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (I.K.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M. Soltanolkotabi)
| | - Fatemeh Behnia
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention (H.C., A.Y., A.B.A., M. Shafiei, M.C.) and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105; Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (I.K.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M. Soltanolkotabi)
| | - Alireza Behrad Abadi
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention (H.C., A.Y., A.B.A., M. Shafiei, M.C.) and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105; Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (I.K.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M. Soltanolkotabi)
| | - Iman Khodarahmi
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention (H.C., A.Y., A.B.A., M. Shafiei, M.C.) and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105; Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (I.K.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M. Soltanolkotabi)
| | - Maryam Soltanolkotabi
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention (H.C., A.Y., A.B.A., M. Shafiei, M.C.) and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105; Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (I.K.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M. Soltanolkotabi)
| | - Mehrzad Shafiei
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention (H.C., A.Y., A.B.A., M. Shafiei, M.C.) and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105; Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (I.K.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M. Soltanolkotabi)
| | - Majid Chalian
- From the Department of Radiology, Divisions of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention (H.C., A.Y., A.B.A., M. Shafiei, M.C.) and Nuclear Medicine (F.B.), University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105; Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY (I.K.); and Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M. Soltanolkotabi)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nouh M, Doweidar A, Khalil AME. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC): A potential in vivo biological surrogate of the incidentally discovered bone lesions at 3T MRI. Eur J Radiol Open 2021; 8:100386. [PMID: 34877369 PMCID: PMC8628214 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To probe the potential of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to rectify the incidentally detected bone lesion on MRI into benign or malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively recruited 44 patients (24 males and 20 females); with 52 bone lesions, who underwent diffusion weighted (DW) imaging using multiple b-values on 3 T MRI. ADC maps were derived and analyzed by two radiologists; blinded to the final diagnosis. The mean ADC values were used for statistical analyses. The diagnosis was deduced by histopathological confirmation; in 32 lesions and strict clinical and imaging follow-up for at least 12 months; in 20 lesions. RESULTS The mean ADC value (mean±SD) of all malignant tumors (including cartilaginous neoplasms) was [0.92 ± 0.40] × 10-3 mm2/s. This significantly differed from those of both primary benign tumors [1.14 ± 0.24] × 10-3 mm2/s, (p = 0.011), and all non-malignant lesions collectively [1.29 ± 0.44] × 10-3 mm2/s, (p < 0.001). Using mADC value of ≤ 1.1 × 10-3 mm2/s resulted in 86.1% sensitivity and 62.5% specificity for characterizing a lesion as a malignant. The inter-rater reliability was almost perfect (95% CI = 0.954-0.985). CONCLUSION ADC could be a non-invasive in-vivo surrogate that may be able to discern the incidentally discovered osseous lesions into benign and malignant pathologies and guide further diagnostic workup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M.R. Nouh
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Doweidar
- Department of Radiology, SWBH NHS TRUST, Birmingham, West Midlands B187QH, UK
| | - Abdullah Mohie-Eddin Khalil
- Department of Radiology and Clinical Imaging, El-Razi Hospital, Gamal Abd El-Nasser Street, Sulibakhat, 13001 Kuwait City, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hansen JA, Naghavi-Behzad M, Gerke O, Baun C, Falch K, Duvnjak S, Alavi A, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Hildebrandt MG. Diagnosis of bone metastases in breast cancer: Lesion-based sensitivity of dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT compared to low-dose CT and bone scintigraphy. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0260066. [PMID: 34793550 PMCID: PMC8601566 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared lesion-based sensitivity of dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT, bone scintigraphy (BS), and low-dose CT (LDCT) for detection of various types of bone metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Prospectively, we included 18 patients with recurrent breast cancer who underwent dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT with LDCT and BS within a median time interval of three days. A total of 488 bone lesions were detected on any of the modalities and were categorized by the LDCT into osteolytic, osteosclerotic, mixed morphologic, and CT-negative lesions. Lesion-based sensitivity was 98.2% (95.4-99.3) and 98.8% (96.8-99.5) for early and delayed FDG-PET/CT, respectively, compared with 79.9% (51.1-93.8) for LDCT, 76.0% (36.3-94.6) for BS, and 98.6% (95.4-99.6) for the combined BS+LDCT. BS detected only 51.2% of osteolytic lesions which was significantly lower than other metastatic types. SUVs were significantly higher for all lesion types on delayed scans than on early scans (P<0.0001). Osteolytic and mixed-type lesions had higher SUVs than osteosclerotic and CT-negative metastases at both time-points. FDG-PET/CT had significantly higher lesion-based sensitivity than LDCT and BS, while a combination of the two yielded sensitivity comparable to that of FDG-PET/CT. Therefore, FDG-PET/CT could be considered as a sensitive one-stop-shop in case of clinical suspicion of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Ansholm Hansen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- * E-mail:
| | - Oke Gerke
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christina Baun
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Falch
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sandra Duvnjak
- Radiology Department–Breast Imaging, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Mammography Screening Center in the Capital Region, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Abass Alavi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Personalized Response Monitoring in Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
More than 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clinical guidelines for the management of these patients largely focus on the use of salvage radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. However, not all patients with biochemical recurrence will go on to develop metastases or die from their disease. The optimal pre-salvage therapy investigational workup for patients who experience biochemical recurrence should, therefore, include novel techniques such as PET imaging and genomic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimen tissue, as well as consideration of more traditional clinical variables such as PSA value, PSA kinetics, Gleason score and pathological stage of disease. In patients without metastatic disease, the only known curative intervention is salvage radiotherapy but, given the therapeutic burden of this treatment, importance must be placed on accurate timing of treatment, radiation dose, fractionation and field size. Systemic therapy also has a role in the salvage setting, both concurrently with radiotherapy and as salvage monotherapy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Nistikoulis G, Christodoulou E, Kambouri K, Deftereos SP. An Unexpected Location of Enostosis, a Pediatric "Never Mind" Bone Lesion. MÆDICA 2021; 16:318-319. [PMID: 34621359 DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2020.16.2.318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Enostoses, also known as bone islands, are common benign sclerotic bone lesion that usually represent incidental findings. They constitute a small focus of compact bone within cancellous bone. Enostoses can be seen on radiographs, CT, and MRI, and are considered one of the skeletal do not touch lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Nistikoulis
- Department of Radiology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | | | - Katerina Kambouri
- Departement of Paediatric Surgery, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Savas P Deftereos
- Department of Radiology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prostate adenocarcinoma with osteolytic metastases: Case report and review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep 2021; 16:3565-3568. [PMID: 34567333 PMCID: PMC8449088 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2021.08.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies among males and commonly metastasizes to bone in advanced stages. Although such osseous metastases are typically osteoblastic, osteolytic lesions are also seen. Here, we present a case of an 81-year-old male with known prostate cancer who presented due to a pathologic right humerus fracture. After skeletal survey and further workup, he was found to have two osteolytic lesions within his right femur. Bone curettage of the right femur revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma from a prostate primary. This case exemplifies the importance of recognizing the potential for prostate cancer metastases to present as osteolytic lesions.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lange MB, Petersen LJ, Nielsen MB, Zacho HD. Validity of negative bone biopsy in suspicious bone lesions. Acta Radiol Open 2021; 10:20584601211030662. [PMID: 34377541 PMCID: PMC8323434 DOI: 10.1177/20584601211030662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The presence of malignant cells in bone biopsies is considered gold standard to verify occurrence of cancer, whereas a negative bone biopsy can represent a false negative, with a risk of increasing patient morbidity and mortality and creating misleading conclusions in cancer research. However, a paucity of literature documents the validity of negative bone biopsy as an exclusion criterion for the presence of skeletal malignancies. Purpose To investigate the validity of a negative bone biopsy in bone lesions suspicious of malignancy. Material and Method A retrospective cohort of 215 consecutive targeted non-malignant skeletal biopsies from 207 patients (43% women, 57% men, median age 64, and range 94) representing suspicious focal bone lesions, collected from January 1, 2011, to July 31, 2013, was followed over a 2-year period to examine any additional biopsy, imaging, and clinical follow-up information to categorize the original biopsy as truly benign, malignant, or equivocal. Standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results 210 of 215 biopsies (98%; 95% CI 0.94-0.99) showed to be truly benign 2 years after initial biopsy. Two biopsies were false negatives (1%; 95% CI 0.001-0.03), and three were equivocal (lack of imaging description). Conclusion Our study documents negative bone biopsy as a valid criterion for the absence of bone metastasis. Since only 28% had a confirmed diagnosis of prior cancer and not all patients received adequately sensitive imaging, our results might not be applicable to all cancer patients with suspicious bone lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mine B Lange
- Department of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital of North Zealand, Hilleroed, Denmark.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars J Petersen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Michael B Nielsen
- Department of Radiology, National University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Imaging Review of Pediatric Benign Osteocytic Tumors and Latest Updates on Management. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10132823. [PMID: 34206870 PMCID: PMC8267885 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pediatric benign osteocytic tumors include osteoma, enostosis, osteoid osteoma, and osteoblastoma. In pediatric populations, benign bone tumors are more common than malignancies. Benign osteocytic tumors may have a unique clinical presentation that helps narrow the differential diagnosis. A systemic imaging approach should be utilized to reach the diagnosis and guide clinicians in management. Radiographs are the most prevalent and cost-effective imaging modality. Cross-sectional imaging can be utilized for tissue characterization and for evaluation of lesions involving complex anatomical areas such as the pelvis and spine. Computed Tomography (CT) is the modality of choice for diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. CT scan can also be utilized to guide radiofrequency ablation, which has been found to be highly effective in treating osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Enostosis is a no-touch lesion. Osteoma is commonly located in the paranasal sinuses. Osteoma needs an excision if it causes complications due to a mass effect.
Collapse
|
18
|
Levine J, Petkovska I, Landa J, Bates DDB, Capanu M, Fuqua JL, Paroder V, Zheng J, Gollub MJ, Pernicka JSG. Bone lesions on baseline staging rectal MRI: prevalence and significance in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:2423-2431. [PMID: 33543320 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02923-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
A T1 sequence on routine baseline staging rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is thought to help detect bone lesions. Our primary aim was to evaluate the incidence of bone lesions encountered on baseline staging rectal MRI, particularly the prevalence of bone metastases. This retrospective study included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent baseline rectal MRI at our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. The MRI report was reviewed for presence of bone lesions. When found, lesion type, presence of axial T1 non-fat-suppressed sequence, primary tumor T-stage, and presence of other organ metastases were recorded. In the absence of bone biopsy, the reference standard was follow-up imaging via computed tomography (CT), MRI, and/or positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) ≥ 1 year after the baseline MRI. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare clinicopathologic data of patients with malignant or benign bone lesions. A total of 1197 patients were included. 62/1197 patients (mean age 56.8 years (SD: 13.8), with 39 men) had bone lesions on baseline imaging, with 6 being bone metastases (0.5%, 95% CI 0.2%-1.1%). Of the 6 patients with bone metastases, 5/6 had other metastases (i.e., liver, lung) at baseline. Bone metastases on baseline rectal MRI performed for rectal adenocarcinoma are extremely rare. Furthermore, bone metastases without other organ (i.e., liver, lung) involvement is extremely rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Levine
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Lenox Hill Hospital, 100 E 77th Street, New York, NY, 10075, USA.
| | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Jonathan Landa
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - J Louis Fuqua
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Junting Zheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Jennifer S Golia Pernicka
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lourenço JV, Coelho J, Salgueiro A. Enostosis-related epilepsy. BJR Case Rep 2021; 7:20200152. [PMID: 34131493 PMCID: PMC8171133 DOI: 10.1259/bjrcr.20200152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Unexpected bone lesions of the skull present a common dilemma, where radiological appearance and patient’s clinical background are crucial to avoid misdiagnosis. Enostosis are benign sclerotic bone lesions; its aetiology is still unknown and its management is usually conservative, with good prognosis. Most of these lesions are asymptomatic and neurological involvement is rare. We present the first report of enostosis-related epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Vaz Lourenço
- Department of Internal Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Joana Coelho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Andrea Salgueiro
- Department of Emergency, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gulati V, Chalian M, Yi J, Thakur U, Chhabra A. Sclerotic bone lesions caused by non-infectious and non-neoplastic diseases: a review of the imaging and clinicopathologic findings. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50:847-869. [PMID: 33040177 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03644-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Bone sclerosis is a focal, multifocal, or diffuse increase in the density of the bone matrix on radiographs or computed tomography (CT) imaging. This radiological finding can be caused by a broad spectrum of diseases, such as congenital and developmental disorders, depositional disorders, and metabolic diseases. The differential diagnosis can be effectively narrowed by an astute radiologist in the light of the clinical picture and typical findings on imaging. Some of these lesions are rare and have been described as case reports and series in the literature. This article aims to collate the clinical-radiologic findings of non-infectious and non-neoplastic causes of bone sclerosis with relevant imaging illustrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Majid Chalian
- Department of Radiology, Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jaehyuck Yi
- Department of Radiology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Uma Thakur
- Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Avneesh Chhabra
- Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Musculoskeletal Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9178, USA.
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Walton Centre of Neurosciences, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Husseini JS, Amorim BJ, Torrado-Carvajal A, Prabhu V, Groshar D, Umutlu L, Herrmann K, Cañamaque LG, Garzón JRG, Palmer WE, Heidari P, Shih TTF, Sosna J, Matushita C, Cerci J, Queiroz M, Muglia VF, Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Borra RJH, Kwee TC, Glaudemans AWJM, Evangelista L, Salvatore M, Cuocolo A, Soricelli A, Herold C, Laghi A, Mayerhoefer M, Mahmood U, Catana C, Daldrup-Link HE, Rosen B, Catalano OA. An international expert opinion statement on the utility of PET/MR for imaging of skeletal metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:1522-1537. [PMID: 33619599 PMCID: PMC8240455 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05198-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND MR is an important imaging modality for evaluating musculoskeletal malignancies owing to its high soft tissue contrast and its ability to acquire multiparametric information. PET provides quantitative molecular and physiologic information and is a critical tool in the diagnosis and staging of several malignancies. PET/MR, which can take advantage of its constituent modalities, is uniquely suited for evaluating skeletal metastases. We reviewed the current evidence of PET/MR in assessing for skeletal metastases and provided recommendations for its use. METHODS We searched for the peer reviewed literature related to the usage of PET/MR in the settings of osseous metastases. In addition, expert opinions, practices, and protocols of major research institutions performing research on PET/MR of skeletal metastases were considered. RESULTS Peer-reviewed published literature was included. Nuclear medicine and radiology experts, including those from 13 major PET/MR centers, shared the gained expertise on PET/MR use for evaluating skeletal metastases and contributed to a consensus expert opinion statement. [18F]-FDG and non [18F]-FDG PET/MR may provide key advantages over PET/CT in the evaluation for osseous metastases in several primary malignancies. CONCLUSION PET/MR should be considered for staging of malignancies where there is a high likelihood of osseous metastatic disease based on the characteristics of the primary malignancy, hight clinical suspicious and in case, where the presence of osseous metastases will have an impact on patient management. Appropriate choice of tumor-specific radiopharmaceuticals, as well as stringent adherence to PET and MR protocols, should be employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jad S Husseini
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bárbara Juarez Amorim
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences,, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Angel Torrado-Carvajal
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Medical Image Analysis and Biometry Laboratory, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vinay Prabhu
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Groshar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lina García Cañamaque
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - William E Palmer
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pedram Heidari
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jacob Sosna
- Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Cristina Matushita
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital São Lucas of Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Juliano Cerci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Quanta Diagnóstico Nuclear, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Queiroz
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Valdair Francisco Muglia
- Department of Medical Images, Radiation Therapy and Oncohematology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, Hospital Clinicas, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Prêto, Brazil
| | - Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa
- Department of Medical Imaging, Hematology and Clinical Oncology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School. University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Prêto, Brazil
| | - Ronald J H Borra
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas C Kwee
- Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Andor W J M Glaudemans
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Salvatore
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Università Suor Orsola Benincasa di Napoli, Naples, Italy
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institute for Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) SDN, Istituto di Ricerca, Naples, Italy
| | - Alberto Cuocolo
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institute for Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) SDN, Istituto di Ricerca, Naples, Italy
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Science, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Soricelli
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Institute for Hospitalization and Healthcare (IRCCS) SDN, Istituto di Ricerca, Naples, Italy
- Department of Movement and Wellness Sciences, Parthenope University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Christian Herold
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Radiology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Marius Mayerhoefer
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Umar Mahmood
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ciprian Catana
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Bruce Rosen
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Azar A, Garner HW, Rhodes NG, Yarlagadda B, Wessell DE. CT Attenuation Values Do Not Reliably Distinguish Benign Sclerotic Lesions From Osteoblastic Metastases in Patients Undergoing Bone Biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216:1022-1030. [PMID: 32755207 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.24029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. CT attenuation thresholds that accurately distinguish enostoses from untreated osteoblastic metastases have been published. In the Mayo Clinic practices, these thresholds have been applied more broadly to distinguish benign sclerotic bone lesions other than enostoses from osteoblastic metastases. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to determine if CT attenuation thresholds allow the distinguishing of benign sclerotic bone lesions from osteoblastic metastases in patients undergoing bone biopsy. METHODS. A retrospective search was conducted to identify sclerotic lesions described on CT between October 7, 1998, and July 15, 2018, that underwent subsequent biopsy. Two musculoskeletal radiologists recorded lesions' maximum and mean attenuation. Using previously published attenuation thresholds, sensitivity and specificity for differentiating benign sclerotic lesions from osteoblastic metastases were calculated. ROC curve analysis was performed to determine if more appropriate attenuation thresholds exist. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed. RESULTS. A total of 280 patients met inclusion criteria. Of those, 162 had malignant biopsy results and 118 had benign biopsy results. Of the 162 malignant lesions, 81 had received prior treatment. Maximum and mean attenuation were not significantly different between benign and malignant lesions for either reader (all p > .05). For reader 1, to distinguish benign from malignant lesions, a maximum attenuation threshold of more than 1060 HU resulted in sensitivity of 23.7%, specificity of 87.0%, and accuracy of 60.6%. A mean attenuation threshold of greater than 885 HU resulted in sensitivity of 19.5%, specificity of 90.7%, and accuracy 60.7%. ROC curve analysis showed AUCs for mean and maximum attenuation thresholds of 51.8% and 54.6%, respectively. Subgroup analyses of benign versus malignant and treated versus untreated lesions had similar results. Similar findings were obtained for reader 2. The two readers' ICC was 0.946 for maximum attenuation and 0.918 for mean attenuation. CONCLUSION. Published attenuation thresholds for distinguishing enostoses from osteoblastic metastases had slightly decreased specificity and markedly decreased sensitivity when applied to the differentiation of benign sclerotic lesions from osteoblastic metastases in our sample of biopsy-proven lesions. ROC analysis showed no high-performing attenuation threshold alternative. CLINICAL IMPACT. Published CT attenuation thresholds intended for distinguishing enostoses from osteoblastic metastases should not be used more broadly. More accurate alternative thresholds could not be derived.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Azar
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | - Hillary W Garner
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| | | | - Bhavya Yarlagadda
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy-Health-St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital, Youngstown, OH
| | - Daniel E Wessell
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Meek RD, Mills MK, Hanrahan CJ, Beckett BR, Leake RL, Allen H, Williams DD, Tommack M, Schmahmann S, Hansford BG. Pearls and Pitfalls for Soft-Tissue and Bone Biopsies: A Cross-Institutional Review. Radiographics 2021; 40:266-290. [PMID: 31917660 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020190089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Management of soft-tissue and bone neoplasms depends on a definitive histologic diagnosis. Percutaneous image-guided biopsy of bone and soft-tissue tumors is a cost-effective and accurate method to obtain a histopathologic diagnosis. Biopsy requests must be approached thoughtfully to avoid numerous potential pitfalls. Hasty biopsy planning places the patient at increased risk for misdiagnosis, delayed therapy, repeated invasive procedures, and substantial morbidity. Biopsy planning begins with a thorough review of the relevant clinical history and pertinent imaging. The biopsy route must be planned in concert with the referring orthopedic oncologist to preserve limb-sparing options. Carefully selecting the most appropriate imaging modality to guide the biopsy increases the chances of reaching a definitive diagnosis. It is also critical to identify and target with expertise the part of the lesion that is most likely to yield an accurate diagnosis. Percutaneous biopsy is a safe procedure, and familiarity with preprocedural laboratory testing parameters, anticoagulation guidelines, and commonly used sedation medications minimizes the risk of complications while ensuring patient comfort. Nondiagnostic biopsy results are not infrequent and may still have value in guiding patient treatment. Awareness of the imaging manifestations of tumor recurrence is also important. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of pertinent preprocedural, periprocedural, and postprocedural considerations for bone and soft-tissue musculoskeletal biopsies.The online slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article.©RSNA, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Meek
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| | - Megan K Mills
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| | - Christopher J Hanrahan
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| | - Brooke R Beckett
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| | - Richard L Leake
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| | - Hailey Allen
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| | - Don D Williams
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| | - Matthew Tommack
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| | - Sandra Schmahmann
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| | - Barry G Hansford
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239 (R.D.M., B.R.B., S.S., B.G.H.); Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (M.K.M., C.J.H., R.L.L., H.A.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (D.D.W.); and private practice, Eugene, Ore (M.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Phinyo P, Maihom T, Phanphaisarn A, Kerdsinchai P, Rattarittamrong E, Patumanond J, Pruksakorn D. Development of a clinical diagnostic tool to differentiate multiple myeloma from bone metastasis in patients with destructive bone lesions (MM-BM DDx). BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:215. [PMID: 33087068 PMCID: PMC7579980 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01283-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with destructive bone lesions undergo a comprehensive diagnostic procedure to ensure that proper treatment decisions are pursued. For patients with multiple myeloma, this can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment initiation. This study was conducted to develop a diagnostic rule that could serve as a tool for early identification of multiple myeloma and promote timely referral of patients to haematologists. METHODS The clinical prediction rule was developed using a retrospective case-series of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and those with bone metastasis (BM) at Chiang Mai University Hospital from 2012 to 2015. Multivariable fractional polynomial logistic regression was used to derive a diagnostic model to differentiate between MM and BM patients (MM-BM DDx). RESULTS A total of 586 patients (136 MM patients and 450 BM patients) were included. Serum creatinine, serum globulin, and serum alkaline phosphatase were identified as significant indicators for the differentiation of MM and BM patients. The MM-BM DDx model showed excellent discriminative ability [AuROC of 0.90 (95%CI 0.86 to 0.93)] and good calibration. CONCLUSIONS This MM-BM DDx model could potentially allow for early myeloma diagnosis and improvement of overall prognosis. A prospective validation study is needed to confirm the accuracy of the MM-BM DDx model prior to its application in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phichayut Phinyo
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Titinat Maihom
- Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Areerak Phanphaisarn
- Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Pakorn Kerdsinchai
- Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Ekarat Rattarittamrong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Division of hematology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Jayanton Patumanond
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Dumnoensun Pruksakorn
- Musculoskeletal Science and Translational Research (MSTR), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
- Biomedical Engineering Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
- Omics Center for Health Sciences (OCHS), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Orthopedic Laboratory and Research Network (OLARN), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to describe the imaging appearance, etiology, clinical features, and treatment of rare presentations of common bone and joint diseases known to mimic Hill-Sachs lesions. Knowledge of uncommonly encountered manifestations of ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, septic joint, hyperparathyroidism, hydroxyapatite deposition disease, malignant bone tumors, and benign bone cysts which mimic traumatic Hill-Sachs lesions is important for radiologists to guide the clinical care of patients who present with shoulder symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Herring
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 21668University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Derik L Davis
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 21668University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Marshall RA, Mandell JC, Weaver MJ, Ferrone M, Sodickson A, Khurana B. Imaging Features and Management of Stress, Atypical, and Pathologic Fractures. Radiographics 2019; 38:2173-2192. [PMID: 30422769 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018180073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic and atraumatic fractures are entities with distinct but often overlapping clinical manifestations, imaging findings, and management protocols. This article is a review of terminology, etiology, and key imaging features that affect management of atraumatic fractures including stress fractures, atypical femoral fractures, and pathologic fractures. The terminology of atraumatic fractures is reviewed, with an emphasis on the distinctions and similarities of stress, atypical, and pathologic fractures. The basic biomechanics of normal bone is described, with an emphasis on the bone remodeling pathway. This framework is used to better convey the shared etiologies, key differences, and important imaging findings of these types of fractures. Next, the characteristic imaging findings of this diverse family of fractures is discussed. For each type of fracture, the most clinically relevant imaging features that guide management by the multidisciplinary treatment team, including orthopedic surgeons, are reviewed. In addition, imaging features are reviewed to help discriminate stress fractures from pathologic fractures in patients with challenging cases. Finally, imaging criteria to risk stratify an impending pathologic fracture at the site of an osseous neoplasm are discussed. Special attention is paid to fractures occurring in the proximal femur because the osseous macrostructure and mix of trabecular and cortical bone of the proximal femur can function as a convenient framework to understanding atraumatic fractures throughout the skeleton. Atraumatic fractures elsewhere in the body also are used to illustrate key imaging features and treatment concepts. ©RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Marshall
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.A.M., J.C.M., A.S., B.K.) and Orthopedic Surgery (M.J.W., M.F.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Jacob C Mandell
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.A.M., J.C.M., A.S., B.K.) and Orthopedic Surgery (M.J.W., M.F.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Michael J Weaver
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.A.M., J.C.M., A.S., B.K.) and Orthopedic Surgery (M.J.W., M.F.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Marco Ferrone
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.A.M., J.C.M., A.S., B.K.) and Orthopedic Surgery (M.J.W., M.F.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Aaron Sodickson
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.A.M., J.C.M., A.S., B.K.) and Orthopedic Surgery (M.J.W., M.F.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Bharti Khurana
- From the Departments of Radiology (R.A.M., J.C.M., A.S., B.K.) and Orthopedic Surgery (M.J.W., M.F.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
| |
Collapse
|