1
|
Battistella A, Tacelli M, Mapelli P, Schiavo Lena M, Andreasi V, Genova L, Muffatti F, De Cobelli F, Partelli S, Falconi M. Recent developments in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 18:155-169. [PMID: 38647016 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2342837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (PanNENs) are characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical and biological behavior, making their diagnosis challenging. PanNENs diagnostic work-up mainly relies on biochemical markers, pathological examination, and imaging evaluation. The latter includes radiological imaging (i.e. computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), functional imaging (i.e. 68Gallium [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT and Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose [18F]FDG PET/CT), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with its associated procedures. AREAS COVERED This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the recent advancements in the PanNENs diagnostic field. PubMed and Embase databases were used for the research, performed from inception to October 2023. EXPERT OPINION A deeper understanding of PanNENs biology, recent technological improvements in imaging modalities, as well as progresses achieved in molecular and cytological assays, are fundamental players for the achievement of early diagnosis and enhanced preoperative characterization of PanNENs. A multimodal diagnostic approach is required for a thorough disease assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Battistella
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Tacelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Pancreato-biliary Endoscopy and EUS Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Andreasi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luana Genova
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Muffatti
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Radiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Partelli
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mori M, Palumbo D, Muffatti F, Partelli S, Mushtaq J, Andreasi V, Prato F, Ubeira MG, Palazzo G, Falconi M, Fiorino C, De Cobelli F. Prediction of the characteristics of aggressiveness of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) based on CT radiomic features. Eur Radiol 2022; 33:4412-4421. [PMID: 36547673 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09351-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To predict tumor grade (G1 vs. G2/3), presence of distant metastasis (M+), metastatic lymph nodes (N+), and microvascular invasion (VI) of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNEN) based on preoperative CT radiomic features (RFs), by applying a machine learning approach aimed to limit overfit. METHODS This retrospective study included 101 patients who underwent surgery for PanNEN; the entire population was split into training (n = 70) and validation cohort (n = 31). Based on a previously validated methodology, after tumor segmentation on contrast-enhanced CT, RFs were extracted from unenhanced CT images. In addition, conventional radiological and clinical features were combined with RFs into multivariate logistic regression models using minimum redundancy and a bootstrap-based machine learning approach. For each endpoint, models were trained and validated including only RFs (RF_model), and both (radiomic and clinicoradiological) features (COMB_model). RESULTS Twenty-five patients had G2/G3 tumor, 37 N+, and 14 M+ and 38 were shown to have VI. From a total of 182 RFs initially extracted, few independent radiomic and clinicoradiological features were identified. For M+ and G, the resulting models showed moderate to high performances: areas under the curve (AUC) for training/validation cohorts were 0.85/0.77 (RF_model) and 0.81/0.81 (COMB_model) for M+ and 0.67/0.72 and 0.68/0.70 for G. Concerning N+ and VI, only the COMB_model could be built, with poorer performance for N+ (AUC = 0.72/0.61) compared to VI (0.82/0.75). For all endpoints, the negative predictive value was good (≥ 0.75). CONCLUSIONS Combining few radiomic and clinicoradiological features resulted in presurgical prediction of histological characteristics of PanNENs. Despite the limited risk of overfit, external validations are warranted. KEY POINTS • Histology is the only tool currently available allowing characterization of PanNEN biological characteristics important for prognostic assessment; significant limitations to this approach exist. • Based upon preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images, a machine learning approach optimized to favor models' generalizability was successfully applied to train predictive models for tumor grading (G1 vs. G2/3), microvascular invasion, metastatic lymph nodes, and distant metastatic spread. • Moderate to high discriminative models (AUC: 0.67-0.85) based on few parameters (≤ 3) showing high negative predictive value (0.75-0.98) were generated and then successfully validated.
Collapse
|
3
|
Galgano SJ, Morani AC, Gopireddy DR, Sharbidre K, Bates DDB, Goenka AH, Arif-Tiwari H, Itani M, Iravani A, Javadi S, Faria S, Lall C, Bergsland E, Verma S, Francis IR, Halperin DM, Chatterjee D, Bhosale P, Yano M. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a 2022 update for radiologists. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2022; 47:3962-3970. [PMID: 35244755 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03466-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PaNENs) are a unique group of pancreatic neoplasms with a wide range of clinical presentations and behaviors. Given their heterogeneous appearance and increasing detection on cross-sectional imaging, it is essential that radiologists understand the variable presentation and distinctions PaNENs display compared to other pancreatic neoplasms. Additionally, some of these neoplasms may be hormonally functional, and it is imperative that radiologists be aware of the common clinical presentations of hormonally active PaNENs. Knowledge of PaNEN pathology and treatments may influence which imaging modality is optimal for each patient. Each imaging modality used for PaNENs has distinct advantages and disadvantages, particularly in different treatment settings. Thus, the focus of this manuscript is to provide an update for the radiologist on PaNEN pathology, imaging, and treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | | | - Dheeraj R Gopireddy
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kedar Sharbidre
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajit H Goenka
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hina Arif-Tiwari
- Department of Radiology, University of Arizona-Tuscon, Tuscon, AZ, USA
| | - Malak Itani
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Amir Iravani
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sanaz Javadi
- Department of Radiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Silvana Faria
- Department of Radiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chandana Lall
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Emily Bergsland
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sadhna Verma
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Isaac R Francis
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel M Halperin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Radiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Motoyo Yano
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Qualitative imaging features of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms predict histopathologic characteristics including tumor grade and patient outcome. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2022; 47:3971-3985. [PMID: 35166939 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03430-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify PanNEN imaging features associated with tumor grade and aggressive histopathological features. METHODS Associations between histopathological and imaging features of resected PanNEN were retrospectively tested. Histopathologic features included WHO grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), growth pattern (infiltrative, circumscribed), and intratumoral fibrosis (mature, immature). Imaging features included size, degree/uniformity of enhancement, progressive enhancement, contour, infiltrative appearance (infiltrativeim), calcifications, cystic components, tumor thrombus, vascular occlusion (VO), duct dilatation, and atrophy. Multinomial logistic regression analyses evaluated the magnitude of associations. Association of variables with outcome was assessed using Cox-proportional hazards regression. RESULTS 133 patients were included. 3 imaging features (infiltrativeim, ill-defined contour [contourill], and VO) were associated with all histopathologic parameters and poor outcome. Increase in grade increased odds of contourill by 15.6 times (p = 0.0001, 95% CI 3.8-64.4). PanNEN with VO were 51.1 times (p = 0.0002, 6.5-398.6) more likely to demonstrate LVI. For PanNEN with contourill, infiltrative growth pattern was 51.3 times (p < 0.0001, 9.1-288.4), and fibrosis was 14 times (p = 0.0065, 2.1-93.7) more likely. Contourill was associated with decreased recurrence-free survival (p = 0.0003, HR 18.29, 3.83-87.3) and VO (p = 0.0004, HR6.08, 2.22-16.68) with decreased overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Infiltrativeim, contourill, and VO on imaging are associated with higher grade/histopathological parameters linked to tumor aggression, and poor outcome.
Collapse
|
5
|
New frontiers in imaging including radiomics updates for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:3078-3100. [PMID: 33095312 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02833-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To illustrate the applications of various imaging tools including conventional MDCT, MRI including DWI, CT & MRI radiomics, FDG & DOTATATE PET-CT for diagnosis, staging, grading, prognostication, treatment planning and assessing treatment response in cases of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs). BACKGROUND Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NENs) are very diverse clinically & biologically. Their treatment and prognosis depend on staging and primary site, as well as histological grading, the importance of which is also reflected in the recently updated WHO classification of GEP NENs. Grade 3 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are aggressive & nearly always advanced at diagnosis with poor prognosis; whereas Grades-1 and 2 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be quite indolent. Grade 3 well-differentiated NETs represent a new category of neoplasm with an intermediate prognosis. Importantly, the evidence suggest grade heterogeneity can occur within a given tumor and even grade progression can occur over time. Emerging evidence suggests that several non-invasive qualitative and quantitative imaging features on CT, dual-energy CT (DECT), MRI, PET and somatostatin receptor imaging with new tracers, as well as texture analysis, may be useful to grade, prognosticate, and accurately stage primary NENs. Imaging features may also help to inform choice of treatment and follow these neoplasms post-treatment. CONCLUSION GEP NENs treatment and prognosis depend on the stage as well as histological grade of the tumor. Traditional ways of imaging evaluation for diagnosis and staging does not yet yield sufficient information to replace operative and histological evaluation. Recognition of important qualitative imaging features together with quantitative features and advanced imaging tools including functional imaging with DWI MRI, DOTATATE PET/CT, texture analysis with radiomics and radiogenomic features appear promising for more accurate staging, tumor risk stratification, guiding management and assessing treatment response.
Collapse
|
6
|
Preuss K, Thach N, Liang X, Baine M, Chen J, Zhang C, Du H, Yu H, Lin C, Hollingsworth MA, Zheng D. Using Quantitative Imaging for Personalized Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Radiomics and Deep Learning Applications. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071654. [PMID: 35406426 PMCID: PMC8997008 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary With a five-year survival rate of only 3% for the majority of patients, pancreatic cancer is a global healthcare challenge. Radiomics and deep learning, two novel quantitative imaging methods that treat medical images as minable data instead of just pictures, have shown promise in advancing personalized management of pancreatic cancer through diagnosing precursor diseases, early detection, accurate diagnosis, and treatment personalization. Radiomics and deep learning methods aim to collect hidden information in medical images that is missed by conventional radiology practices through expanding the data search and comparing information across different patients. Both methods have been studied and applied in pancreatic cancer. In this review, we focus on the current progress of these two methods in pancreatic cancer and provide a comprehensive narrative review on the topic. With better regulation, enhanced workflow, and larger prospective patient datasets, radiomics and deep learning methods could show real hope in the battle against pancreatic cancer through personalized precision medicine. Abstract As the most lethal major cancer, pancreatic cancer is a global healthcare challenge. Personalized medicine utilizing cutting-edge multi-omics data holds potential for major breakthroughs in tackling this critical problem. Radiomics and deep learning, two trendy quantitative imaging methods that take advantage of data science and modern medical imaging, have shown increasing promise in advancing the precision management of pancreatic cancer via diagnosing of precursor diseases, early detection, accurate diagnosis, and treatment personalization and optimization. Radiomics employs manually-crafted features, while deep learning applies computer-generated automatic features. These two methods aim to mine hidden information in medical images that is missed by conventional radiology and gain insights by systematically comparing the quantitative image information across different patients in order to characterize unique imaging phenotypes. Both methods have been studied and applied in various pancreatic cancer clinical applications. In this review, we begin with an introduction to the clinical problems and the technology. After providing technical overviews of the two methods, this review focuses on the current progress of clinical applications in precancerous lesion diagnosis, pancreatic cancer detection and diagnosis, prognosis prediction, treatment stratification, and radiogenomics. The limitations of current studies and methods are discussed, along with future directions. With better standardization and optimization of the workflow from image acquisition to analysis and with larger and especially prospective high-quality datasets, radiomics and deep learning methods could show real hope in the battle against pancreatic cancer through big data-based high-precision personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiersten Preuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; (K.P.); (N.T.); (M.B.); (J.C.); (C.L.)
- Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
| | - Nate Thach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; (K.P.); (N.T.); (M.B.); (J.C.); (C.L.)
- Department of Computer Science, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA;
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Michael Baine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; (K.P.); (N.T.); (M.B.); (J.C.); (C.L.)
| | - Justin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; (K.P.); (N.T.); (M.B.); (J.C.); (C.L.)
- Naperville North High School, Naperville, IL 60563, USA
| | - Chi Zhang
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA;
| | - Huijing Du
- Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA;
| | - Hongfeng Yu
- Department of Computer Science, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA;
| | - Chi Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; (K.P.); (N.T.); (M.B.); (J.C.); (C.L.)
| | - Michael A. Hollingsworth
- Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA;
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; (K.P.); (N.T.); (M.B.); (J.C.); (C.L.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14626, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(585)-276-3255
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Casà C, Piras A, D’Aviero A, Preziosi F, Mariani S, Cusumano D, Romano A, Boskoski I, Lenkowicz J, Dinapoli N, Cellini F, Gambacorta MA, Valentini V, Mattiucci GC, Boldrini L. The impact of radiomics in diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 15:26317745221081596. [PMID: 35342883 PMCID: PMC8943316 DOI: 10.1177/26317745221081596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most aggressive tumours, and better risk stratification among patients is required to provide tailored treatment. The meaning of radiomics and texture analysis as predictive techniques are not already systematically assessed. The aim of this study is to assess the role of radiomics in PC. METHODS A PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase systematic review was conducted to assess the role of radiomics in PC. The search strategy was 'radiomics [All Fields] AND ("pancreas" [MeSH Terms] OR "pancreas" [All Fields] OR "pancreatic" [All Fields])' and only original articles referred to PC in humans in the English language were considered. RESULTS A total of 123 studies and 183 studies were obtained using the mentioned search strategy on PubMed and Embase, respectively. After the complete selection process, a total of 56 papers were considered eligible for the analysis of the results. Radiomics methods were applied in PC for assessment technical feasibility and reproducibility aspects analysis, risk stratification, biologic or genomic status prediction and treatment response prediction. DISCUSSION Radiomics seems to be a promising approach to evaluate PC from diagnosis to treatment response prediction. Further and larger studies are required to confirm the role and allowed to include radiomics parameter in a comprehensive decision support system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calogero Casà
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Preziosi
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Mariani
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Cusumano
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ivo Boskoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenkowicz
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Dinapoli
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Partouche E, Yeh R, Eche T, Rozenblum L, Carrere N, Guimbaud R, Dierickx LO, Rousseau H, Dercle L, Mokrane FZ. Updated Trends in Imaging Practices for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Pave the Way for Standardization in the New Era of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Front Oncol 2021; 11:628408. [PMID: 34336643 PMCID: PMC8316992 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Medical imaging plays a central and decisive role in guiding the management of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Our aim was to synthesize all recent literature of PNETs, enabling a comparison of all imaging practices. Methods based on a systematic review and meta-analysis approach, we collected; using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases; all recent imaging-based studies, published from December 2014 to December 2019. Study quality assessment was performed by QUADAS-2 and MINORS tools. Results 161 studies consisting of 19852 patients were included. There were 63 ‘imaging’ studies evaluating the accuracy of medical imaging, and 98 ‘clinical’ studies using medical imaging as a tool for response assessment. A wide heterogeneity of practices was demonstrated: imaging modalities were: CT (57.1%, n=92), MR (42.9%, n=69), PET/CT (13.3%, n=31), and SPECT/CT (9.3%, n=15). International imaging guidelines were mentioned in 2.5% (n=4/161) of studies. In clinical studies, imaging protocol was not mentioned in 30.6% (n=30/98) of cases and only mentioned imaging modality without further information in 63.3% (n=62/98), as compared to imaging studies (1.6% (n=1/63) of (p<0.001)). QUADAS-2 and MINORS tools deciphered existing biases in the current literature. Conclusion We provide an overview of the updated current trends in use of medical imaging for diagnosis and response assessment in PNETs. The most commonly used imaging modalities are anatomical (CT and MRI), followed by PET/CT and SPECT/CT. Therefore, standardization and homogenization of PNETs imaging practices is needed to aggregate data and leverage a big data approach for Artificial Intelligence purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ephraïm Partouche
- Radiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Randy Yeh
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service., New York, NY, United States
| | - Thomas Eche
- Radiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Laura Rozenblum
- Sorbonne Université, Service de Médecine Nucléaire, AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Carrere
- Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Rosine Guimbaud
- Oncology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Hervé Rousseau
- Radiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Laurent Dercle
- Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Vagellos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Katabathina VS, Marji H, Khanna L, Ramani N, Yedururi S, Dasyam A, Menias CO, Prasad SR. Decoding Genes: Current Update on Radiogenomics of Select Abdominal Malignancies. Radiographics 2021; 40:1600-1626. [PMID: 33001791 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Technologic advances in chromosomal analysis and DNA sequencing have enabled genome-wide analysis of cancer cells, yielding considerable data on the genetic basis of malignancies. Evolving knowledge of tumor genetics and oncologic pathways has led to a better understanding of histopathologic features, tumor classification, tumor biologic characteristics, and imaging findings and discovery of targeted therapeutic agents. Radiogenomics is a rapidly evolving field of imaging research aimed at correlating imaging features with gene mutations and gene expression patterns, and it may provide surrogate imaging biomarkers that may supplant genetic tests and be used to predict treatment response and prognosis and guide personalized treatment options. Multidetector CT, multiparametric MRI, and PET with use of multiple radiotracers are some of the imaging techniques commonly used to assess radiogenomic associations. Select abdominal malignancies demonstrate characteristic imaging features that correspond to gene mutations. Recent advances have enabled us to understand the genetics of steatotic and nonsteatotic hepatocellular adenomas, a plethora of morphologic-molecular subtypes of hepatic malignancies, a variety of clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas, a myriad of hereditary and sporadic exocrine and neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas, and the development of targeted therapeutic agents for gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on characteristic KIT gene mutations. Mutations associated with aggressive phenotypes of these malignancies can sometimes be predicted on the basis of their imaging characteristics. Radiologists should be familiar with the genetics and pathogenesis of common cancers that have associated imaging biomarkers, which can help them be integral members of the cancer management team and guide clinicians and pathologists. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2020 See discussion on this article by Luna (pp 1627-1630).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkata S Katabathina
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (V.S.K., H.M., L.K.); Departments of Radiology (S.Y., S.R.P.) and Pathology (N.R.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Haneen Marji
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (V.S.K., H.M., L.K.); Departments of Radiology (S.Y., S.R.P.) and Pathology (N.R.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Lokesh Khanna
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (V.S.K., H.M., L.K.); Departments of Radiology (S.Y., S.R.P.) and Pathology (N.R.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Nisha Ramani
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (V.S.K., H.M., L.K.); Departments of Radiology (S.Y., S.R.P.) and Pathology (N.R.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Sireesha Yedururi
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (V.S.K., H.M., L.K.); Departments of Radiology (S.Y., S.R.P.) and Pathology (N.R.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Anil Dasyam
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (V.S.K., H.M., L.K.); Departments of Radiology (S.Y., S.R.P.) and Pathology (N.R.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Christine O Menias
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (V.S.K., H.M., L.K.); Departments of Radiology (S.Y., S.R.P.) and Pathology (N.R.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| | - Srinivasa R Prasad
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (V.S.K., H.M., L.K.); Departments of Radiology (S.Y., S.R.P.) and Pathology (N.R.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (C.O.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
MacKenzie D, Watters AK, To JT, Young MW, Muratori J, Wilkoff MH, Abraham RG, Plummer MM, Zhang D. ALT Positivity in Human Cancers: Prevalence and Clinical Insights. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2384. [PMID: 34069193 PMCID: PMC8156225 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Many exciting advances in cancer-related telomere biology have been made in the past decade. Of these recent advances, great progress has also been made with respect to the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) pathway. Along with a better understanding of the molecular mechanism of this unique telomere maintenance pathway, many studies have also evaluated ALT activity in various cancer subtypes. We first briefly review and assess a variety of commonly used ALT biomarkers. Then, we provide both an update on ALT-positive (ALT+) tumor prevalence as well as a systematic clinical assessment of the presently studied ALT+ malignancies. Additionally, we discuss the pathogenetic alterations in ALT+ cancers, for example, the mutation status of ATRX and DAXX, and their correlations with the activation of the ALT pathway. Finally, we highlight important ALT+ clinical associations within each cancer subtype and subdivisions within, as well as their prognoses. We hope this alternative perspective will allow scientists, clinicians, and drug developers to have greater insight into the ALT cancers so that together, we may develop more efficacious treatments and improved management strategies to meet the urgent needs of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Maria M. Plummer
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA; (D.M.J.); (A.K.W.); (J.T.T.); (M.W.Y.); (J.M.); (M.H.W.); (R.G.A.)
| | - Dong Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY 11568, USA; (D.M.J.); (A.K.W.); (J.T.T.); (M.W.Y.); (J.M.); (M.H.W.); (R.G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bezzi C, Mapelli P, Presotto L, Neri I, Scifo P, Savi A, Bettinardi V, Partelli S, Gianolli L, Falconi M, Picchio M. Radiomics in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: methodological issues and clinical significance. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:4002-4015. [PMID: 33835220 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05338-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To present the state-of-art of radiomics in the context of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), with a focus on the methodological and technical approaches used, to support the search of guidelines for optimal applications. Furthermore, an up-to-date overview of the current clinical applications of radiomics in the field of PanNETs is provided. METHODS Original articles were searched on PubMed and Science Direct with specific keywords. Evaluations of the selected studies have been focused mainly on (i) the general radiomic workflow and the assessment of radiomic features robustness/reproducibility, as well as on the major clinical applications and investigations accomplished so far with radiomics in the field of PanNETs: (ii) grade prediction, (iii) differential diagnosis from other neoplasms, (iv) assessment of tumor behavior and aggressiveness, and (v) treatment response prediction. RESULTS Thirty-one articles involving PanNETs radiomic-related objectives were selected. In regard to the grade differentiation task, yielded AUCs are currently in the range of 0.7-0.9. For differential diagnosis, the majority of studies are still focused on the preliminary identification of discriminative radiomic features. Limited information is known on the prediction of tumors aggressiveness and of treatment response. CONCLUSIONS Radiomics is recently expanding in the setting of PanNETs. From the analysis of the published data, it is emerging how, prior to clinical application, further validations are necessary and methodological implementations require optimization. Nevertheless, this new discipline might have the potential in assisting the current urgent need of improving the management strategies in PanNETs patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Bezzi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - P Mapelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy.,Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - L Presotto
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - I Neri
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - P Scifo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - A Savi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - V Bettinardi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - S Partelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy.,Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - L Gianolli
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - M Falconi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy.,Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan, 20132, Italy
| | - M Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy. .,Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Khanna L, Prasad SR, Sunnapwar A, Kondapaneni S, Dasyam A, Tammisetti VS, Salman U, Nazarullah A, Katabathina VS. Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: 2020 Update on Pathologic and Imaging Findings and Classification. Radiographics 2020; 40:1240-1262. [PMID: 32795239 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation that show characteristic clinical, histomorphologic, and prognostic features; genetic alterations; and biologic behavior. Up to 10% of panNENs develop in patients with syndromes that predispose them to cancer, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, von Hippel-Lindau disease, tuberous sclerosis complex, neurofibromatosis type 1, and glucagon cell adenomatosis. PanNENs are classified as either functioning tumors, which manifest early because of clinical symptoms related to increased hormone production, or nonfunctioning tumors, which often manifest late because of mass effect. PanNENs are histopathologically classified as well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) or poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (panNECs) according to the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system. Recent advances in cytogenetics and molecular biology have shown substantial heterogeneity in panNECs, and a new tumor subtype, well-differentiated, high-grade panNET, has been introduced. High-grade panNETs and panNECs are two distinct entities with different pathogenesis, clinical features, imaging findings, treatment options, and prognoses. The 2017 WHO classification system and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system include substantial changes. Multidetector CT, MRI, and endoscopic US help in anatomic localization of the primary tumor, local-regional spread, and metastases. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT are helpful for functional and metabolic assessment. Knowledge of recent updates in the pathogenesis, classification, and staging of panNENs and familiarity with their imaging findings allow optimal patient treatment. ©RSNA, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lokesh Khanna
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K., A.S., U.S., V.S.K.) and Pathology (V.S.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; Department of Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (A.N.)
| | - Srinivasa R Prasad
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K., A.S., U.S., V.S.K.) and Pathology (V.S.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; Department of Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (A.N.)
| | - Abhijit Sunnapwar
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K., A.S., U.S., V.S.K.) and Pathology (V.S.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; Department of Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (A.N.)
| | - Sainath Kondapaneni
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K., A.S., U.S., V.S.K.) and Pathology (V.S.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; Department of Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (A.N.)
| | - Anil Dasyam
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K., A.S., U.S., V.S.K.) and Pathology (V.S.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; Department of Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (A.N.)
| | - Varaha S Tammisetti
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K., A.S., U.S., V.S.K.) and Pathology (V.S.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; Department of Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (A.N.)
| | - Umber Salman
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K., A.S., U.S., V.S.K.) and Pathology (V.S.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; Department of Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (A.N.)
| | - Alia Nazarullah
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K., A.S., U.S., V.S.K.) and Pathology (V.S.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; Department of Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (A.N.)
| | - Venkata S Katabathina
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.K., A.S., U.S., V.S.K.) and Pathology (V.S.T.), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229; Department of Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P.); Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex (S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (A.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Tex (A.N.)
| |
Collapse
|