Late-phase pulse-inversion sonography using the contrast agent levovist: differentiation between benign and malignant focal lesions of the liver

Benign liver lesions 2022: Guideline for clinical practice of Associazione Italiana Studio del Fegato (AISF), Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica e Interventistica (SIRM), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB), Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Epatobilio-Pancreatica (AICEP), Società Italiana Trapianti d'Organo (SITO), Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citologia Diagnostica (SIAPEC-IAP) - Part I - Cystic lesions

Benign liver lesions are increasingly diagnosed in daily clinical practice due to the growing use of imaging techniques for the study of the abdomen in patients who have non-specific symptoms and do not have an increased risk of hepatic malignancy. They include simple or parasitic cysts and solid benign tumors which differ widely in terms of prevalence, clinical relevance, symptoms and natural history and often lead to significant clinical problems relating to diagnosis and clinical management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the management of benign focal liver lesions, the Scientific Societies mainly involved in their management have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the present Italian rules and methodologies necessary to produce clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic guidelines based on evidence. Here we present the first part of the guideline, concerning the characterization of focal hepatic lesions detected by ultrasound, and the diagnosis and clinical management of simple and parasitic hepatic cysts, and of polycystic liver disease.

Synthesis of gadolinium-enhanced liver tumors on nonenhanced liver MR images using pixel-level graph reinforcement learning

If successful, synthesis of gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced liver tumors on nonenhanced liver MR images will be critical for liver tumor diagnosis and treatment. This synthesis will offer a safe, efficient, and low-cost clinical alternative to eliminate the use of contrast agents in the current clinical workflow and significantly benefit global healthcare systems. In this study, we propose a novel pixel-level graph reinforcement learning method (Pix-GRL). This method directly takes regular nonenhanced liver images as input and outputs AI-enhanced liver tumor images, thereby making them comparable to traditional Gd-enhanced liver tumor images. In Pix-GRL, each pixel has a pixel-level agent, and the agent explores the pixels features and outputs a pixel-level action to iteratively change the pixel value, ultimately generating AI-enhanced liver tumor images. Most importantly, Pix-GRL creatively embeds a graph convolution to represent all the pixel-level agents. A graph convolution is deployed to the agent for feature exploration to improve the effectiveness through the aggregation of long-range contextual features, as well as outputting the action to enhance the efficiency through shared parameter training between agents. Moreover, in our Pix-GRL method, a novel reward is used to measure pixel-level action to significantly improve the performance by considering the improvement in each action in each pixel with its own future state, as well as those of neighboring pixels. Pix-GRL significantly upgrades the existing medical DRL methods from a single agent to multiple pixel-level agents, becoming the first DRL method for medical image synthesis. Comprehensive experiments on three types of liver tumor datasets (benign, cancerous, and healthy controls) with 325 patients (24,375 images) show that our novel Pix-GRL method outperforms existing medical image synthesis learning methods. It achieved an SSIM of 0.85 ± 0.06 and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.92 in terms of the tumor size. These results prove that the potential exists to develop a successful clinical alternative to Gd-enhanced liver MR imaging.

Three cases of histologically proven hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma evaluated using a second-generation microbubble contrast medium in ultrasonography: case reports

Background

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is rare; it is reported in < 1 person in 1,000,000 individuals. For accurate diagnosis, information regarding multiple graphic modalities in HEH is required. However, there is very little information concerning Sonazoid® contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in HEH.

Case presentation

The present report describes the histologically proven three HEH cases evaluated using Sonazoid® CEUS. Case 1 was a 33-year-old female patient with no relevant past medical history, who experienced right upper quadrant pain. Conventional abdominal US revealed multiple low echoic liver nodules with vague borderlines. In CEUS, the vascularity of the nodules was similar to that seen in the neighboring normal liver. Later in the portal venous and late phases (PVLP) and post vascular phase, washout of Sonazoid® was detected in the nodules. Case 2 was a 93-year-old female patient with a previous medical history including operations for breast cancer and ovary cancer in her 50’s. Conventional abdominal US revealed multiple low echoic nodules, some of which contained cystic lesions. In the early vascular phase of CEUS, nodules excluding the central anechoic regions were enhanced from peripheral sites. Although the enhancement inside the nodules persisted in both the PVLP and post vascular phase, anechoic areas in the center of some nodules were not enhanced at all. Case 3 was a 39-year-old male patient presented with right upper-quadrant pain, without any relevant past medical history. Conventional abdominal US revealed multiple low echoic liver nodules. In the early vascular phase of CEUS, nodules were gradually enhanced from the peripheral sites as ringed enhancement. Sonazoid®was washed out from the nodules in the PVLP and post vascular phase.

Conclusions

The most important feature was peripheral enhancement in the early vascular phase. In case 2, the enhancement of the parenchyma of liver nodules persisted even in the PVLP; indicating the lower degree of malignant potential than others. Actually, the tumors did not extend without any treatment in case 2. Since case 2 is the first case report of HEH with cystic lesions, in patients with liver nodules including cystic lesions, HEH is a potential diagnosis.

Contrast-enhanced US for characterization of focal liver lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating malignant from benign focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched and checked for studies using CEUS in characterization of FLLs. Data necessary to construct 2×2 contingency tables were extracted from included studies. The QUADAS tool was utilized to assess the methodologic quality of the studies. Meta-analysis included data pooling, subgroup analyses, meta-regression and investigation of publication bias was comprehensively performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies were included in this meta-analysis and the overall diagnostic accuracy in characterization of FLLs was as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.92 (95%CI: 0.91-0.93); pooled specificity, 0.87 (95%CI: 0.86-0.88); diagnostic odds ratio, 104.20 (95%CI: 70.42-154.16). Subgroup analysis indicated higher diagnostic accuracy of the second-generation contrast agents (CAs) than the first-generation CA (Levovist; DOR: 118.27 vs. 62.78). Furthermore, Sonazoid demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy among three major CAs (SonoVue, Levovist and Sonazoid; DOR: 118.82 vs. 62.78 vs. 227.39). No potential publication bias was observed of the included studies.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is an accurate tool to stratify the risk of malignancy in FLLs. The second-generation CAs, especially Sonazoid may greatly improve diagnostic performance.

KEY POINTS

• CEUS shows excellent diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant from benign FLLs. • The second-generation CAs have higher diagnostic accuracy than first-generation CAs. • Sonazoid demonstrates the highest diagnostic accuracy among three major CAs.

Microbubbles used for contrast enhanced ultrasound and theragnosis: a review of principles to applications

Ultrasound was developed several decades ago as a useful imaging modality, and it became the second most popular diagnostic tool due to its non-invasiveness, real-time capabilities, and safety. Additionally, ultrasound has been used as a therapeutic tool with several therapeutic agents and in nanomedicine. Ultrasound imaging is often used to diagnose many types of cancers, including breast, stomach, and thyroid cancers. In addition, ultrasound-mediated therapy is used in cases of joint inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoarthritis. Microbubbles, when used as ultrasound contrast agents, can act as echo-enhancers and therapeutic agents, and they can play an essential role in ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-mediated therapy. Recently, various types of ultrasound contrast agents made of lipid, polymer, and protein shells have been used. Air, nitrogen, and perfluorocarbon are usually included in the core of the microbubbles to enhance ultrasound imaging, and therapeutic drugs are conjugated and loaded onto the surface or into the core of the microbubbles, depending on the purpose and properties of the substance. Many research groups have utilized ultrasound contrast agents to enhance the imaging signal in blood vessels or tissues and to overcome the blood-brain barrier or blood-retina barrier. These agents are also used to help treat diseases in various regions or systems of the body, such as the cardiovascular system, or as a cancer treatment. In addition, with the introduction of targeted moiety and multiple functional groups, ultrasound contrast agents are expected to have a potential future in ultrasound imaging and therapy. In this paper, we briefly review the principles of ultrasound and introduce the underlying theory, applications, limitations, and future perspectives of ultrasound contrast agents.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: advance and current status in abdominal imaging

In the field of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US), contrast agents are classified as either first- or second-generation agents depending on the gas within the microbubbles. In the case of first-generation contrast agents, a high-mechanical-index technique is used and only intermittent scanning is possible due to the early destruction of the microbubbles during the scanning. The use of second-generation contrast agents in a low-mechanical-index technique enables continuous scanning. Besides the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, contrastenhanced US is helpful in the monitoring of radiofrequency ablation therapy and in the targeting step of an US-guided biopsy. Recently, there has been a demand for new criteria to evaluate the treatment response obtained using anti-angiogenic agents because morphologic criteria alone may not reflect the treatment response of the tumor and contrast-enhanced US can provide quantitative markers of tissue perfusion. In spite of the concerns related to its cost-effectiveness, contrast-enhanced US has the potential to be more widely used as a complimentary tool or to substitute the current imaging modalities in some occasions.

Evaluation of contrast Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer

Background

The present study was aimed to evaluate the usefulness of contrast Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography (US) for the detection of hepatic metastases in breast cancer patients and compare the clinical efficacy and sensitivity of this technique with conventional contrast unenhanced B-mode US in follow-up examinations of breast cancer patients with liver metastasis.

Methods

We assessed a total of 84 hepatic tumors from 24 patients diagnosed with or suspected of having metastatic cancer. These hepatic nodules were diagnosed through imaging, including dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan, B-mode US or contrast Sonazoid-enhanced US (SEUS). Differences in the sensitivity between US and SEUS were compared using MR imaging, CECT, and follow-up imaging.

Results

A total of 79 nodules were diagnosed as metastatic tumors. The remaining nodules were diagnosed as benign tumors (hepatic hemangioma: n = 3; local fatty change: n = 2). SEUS precisely detected the presence or absence of hepatic tumors in the 24 patients examined, showing a sensitivity of 98.8 % (83 of 84 lesions) for total imaged solid liver lesions, with an accuracy of 98.7 % (78 of 79 lesions) for total metastatic breast cancer lesions. In contrast, conventional B-mode US imaging revealed hepatic tumor lesions at a sensitivity of 66.7 % (56 of 84 lesions) and an accuracy of 64.6 % (51 of 79 lesions), respectively. Furthermore, the false positive and false negative rates were, respectively, 6.33 and 29.1 % for B-mode US and 0 and 1.3 % for SEUS. Moreover, twenty-seven metastatic tumors and five benign lesions (3 hemangiomas and 2 focal fatty changes/sparings) were imaged using SEUS but not conventional B-mode US. Significant differences in diagnostic accuracy rates between contrast Sonazoid-enhanced US and conventional B-mode US were observed (Wilcoxon signed rank test: p = 0.0009). No severe adverse events occurred during SEUS after the administration of Sonazoid, except for a grade 1 skin reaction and nausea in one patient.

Conclusion

These results suggested that Sonazoid could be safely administrated to breast cancer patients with liver metastatic disease. Thus, contrast Sonazoid-enhanced US is a feasible and more effective method than B-mode US for the detection of hepatic metastasis, particularly for small metastatic breast cancer lesions less than 14 mm in diameter, showing significant high sensitivity and accuracy.

Indeterminate solid hepatic lesions identified on non-diagnostic contrast-enhanced computed tomography: assessment of the additional diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the non-cirrhotic liver

OBJECTIVE

To assess the additional diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the characterization of indeterminate solid hepatic lesions identified on non-diagnostic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Fifty-five solid hepatic lesions (1-4 cm in diameter) in 46 non-cirrhotic patients (26 female, 20 male; age±SD, 55±10 years) underwent CEUS after being detected on contrast-enhanced CT which was considered as non-diagnostic after on-site analysis. Two blinded independent readers assessed CT and CEUS scans and were asked to classify retrospectively each lesion as a malignant or benign based on reference diagnostic criteria for the different hepatic lesion histotypes. Diagnostic accuracy and confidence (area--Az--under ROC curve) were assessed by using gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (n=30 lesions), histology (n=7 lesions), or US follow-up (n=18 lesions) as the reference standards.

RESULTS

Final diagnoses included 29 hemangiomas, 3 focal nodular hyperplasias, 1 hepatocellular adenoma, and 22 metastases. The additional review of CEUS after CT images improved significantly (P<.05) the diagnostic accuracy (before vs after CEUS review=49% [20/55] vs 89% [49/55]--reader 1 and 43% [24/55] vs 92% [51/55]--reader 2) and confidence (Az, 95% Confidence Intervals before vs after CEUS review=.773 [.652-.895] vs .997 [.987-1]--reader 1 and .831 [.724-.938] vs .998 [.992-1]--reader 2).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS improved the characterization of indeterminate solid hepatic lesions identified on non-diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT by identifying some specific contrast enhancement patterns.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

International guidelines of Ultrasound recommend the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as the first method of choice after conventional ultrasound for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions. However, these recommendations are based on the results of multiple single studies and only few large multicentre studies.

AIMS

The rationale of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the overall sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions.

METHODS

Literature databases were searched up to March 2012. Inclusion criteria were evaluation of CEUS, assessment of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model based on the DerSimonian Laird method. Quality analyses were carried out to assess sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies with 8147 focal liver lesions were included in the analysis. Overall sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions was 93% (95%-CI: 91-95%) and 90% (95%-CI: 88-92%) respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies. However, subanalysis revealed no significant difference when evaluating studies using histology for all liver lesions, when comparing high-quality and low-quality studies, and blinded vs non-blinded studies.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis support the international recommendations on CEUS for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions selecting patients who need further diagnostics.

Current consensus and guidelines of contrast enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions

The application of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) is considered essential when evaluating focal liver lesions (FLLs) using ultrasonography (US). Microbubble UCAs are easy to use and robust; their use poses no risk of nephrotoxicity and requires no ionizing radiation. The unique features of contrast enhanced US (CEUS) are not only noninvasiveness but also real-time assessing of liver perfusion throughout the vascular phases. The later feature has led to dramatic improvement in the diagnostic accuracy of US for detection and characterization of FLLs as well as the guidance to therapeutic procedures and evaluation of response to treatment. This article describes the current consensus and guidelines for the use of UCAs for the FLLs that are commonly encountered in US. After a brief description of the bases of different CEUS techniques, contrast-enhancement patterns of different types of benign and malignant FLLs and other clinical applications are described and discussed on the basis of our experience and the literature data.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: a meta-analysis

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) was determined in patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs) in a meta-analysis. Meta-Disc version 1.4 was used to describe and calculate sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). In the 25 included studies, the pooled estimate of CEUS studies for sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 87% (95% CI 85-88), 89% (95% CI 87-91) and 78.84 (95% CI 29.40-211.40), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 86% (95% CI 84-88), 82% (95% CI 77-86) and 26.34 (95% CI 8.32-83.39), respectively, for the CECT studies. Sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 85% (95% CI 82-88), 87% (95% CI 83-91) and 48.37 (95% CI 15.87-147.45), respectively, for the CEMRI studies. SROC analysis indicated that the diagnostic value of CEUS for FLLs is not significantly different from that of CECT and CEMRI.

Accuracy of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS with a second-generation perflutren lipid microsphere contrast agent (with video)

BACKGROUND

EUS-FNA has limitations in cancer diagnosis/staging. New contrast agents, transducers, and processors have improved the potential of contrast-enhanced harmonic (CEH)-EUS.

OBJECTIVE

To determine optimal settings and preliminary accuracy of CEH-EUS by using a second-generation perflutren lipid microsphere contrast agent and a prototype linear echoendoscope.

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative, pilot study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care medical center.

PATIENTS

This study involved patients with esophageal/pancreatic/liver tumors or adenopathy.

INTERVENTION

Contrast agent was injected (10 μL/kg intravenously in 1-2 doses), and the mechanical index was optimized over 5 cases (0.3). Intermittent/continuous imaging was used with extended pure harmonic detection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Before-contrast and after-contrast predictions of neoplasia (5-point Likert scale). The reference standard was positive tissue or 6-month follow-up. Perfusion factors (sequence, pattern, washout) were noted, and phases were video recorded (arterial, venous, and postvenous).

RESULTS

Thirty sites (7 nodes and 16 pancreatic and 7 nonpancreatic masses) were imaged in 21 patients; 21 of 30 had FNA, and 5 had surgery. Four cases (13.3%) were rated as undecided/indeterminate with EUS (vs 1 [3.3%] with CEH-EUS; P = .35). Twenty-four cases with confirmed diagnoses (12 malignant and 12 benign) were used for test performance: positive/negative predictive values for CEH-EUS were 80.0% (95% confidence interval, 51.9%-95.7%)/100.0% (95% confidence interval, 63.0%-100.0%) versus 84.6%/100.0% for EUS. Accuracies, counting "undecided" (1 in CEH-EUS and 4 in EUS) as incorrect, were 83.3% and 79.2%. In 2 cases, management would change significantly: (1) liver hemangioma, avoiding FNA; and (2) mediastinal "cyst" confirmed as solid.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample. Tissue not always available.

CONCLUSION

CEH-EUS adds minimal imaging time and is accurate, with small improvement over EUS. Added information in vascular and cystic lesions can potentially change management.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound of hepatocellular carcinoma

Sonazoid (Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan), a second-generation of a lipid-stabilized suspension of a perfluorobutane gas microbubble contrast agent, has been used clinically in patients with liver tumors and for harmonic gray-scale ultrasonography (US) in Japan since January 2007. Sonazoid-enhanced US has two phases of contrast enhancement: vascular and late. In the late phase of Sonazoid-enhanced US, we scanned the whole liver using this modality at a low mechanical index (MI) without destroying the microbubbles, and this method allows detection of small viable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions which cannot be detected by conventional US as perfusion defects in the late phase. Re-injection of Sonazoid into an HCC lesion which previously showed a perfusion defect in the late phase is useful for confirming blood flow into the defects. High MI intermittent imaging at 2 frames per second in the late phase is also helpful in differentiation between necrosis and viable hypervascular HCC lesions. Sonazoid-enhanced US by the coded harmonic angio mode at a high MI not only allows clear observation of tumor vessels and tumor enhancement, but also permits automatic scanning with Sonazoid-enhanced three dimensional (3D) US. Fusion images combining US with contrast-enhanced CT or contrast-enhanced MRI have made it easy to detect typical or atypical HCC lesions. By these methods, Sonazoid-enhanced US can characterize liver tumors, grade HCC lesions histologically, recognize HCC dedifferentiation, evaluate the efficacy of ablation therapy or transcatheter arterial embolization, and guide ablation therapy for unresectable HCC. This article reviews the current developments and applications of Sonazoid-enhanced US and Sonazoid-enhanced 3D US for diagnosing and treating hepatic lesions, especially HCC.

Application of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography in the decision-making about hepatocellular carcinoma operation

AIM: To evaluate the detection and differentiation ability of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography (CE-IOUS) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) operations.

METHODS: Clinical data of 50 HCC patients were retrospective analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, false negative and false positive rates of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI), IOUS and CE-IOUS were calculated and compared. Surgical strategy changes due to CE-IOUS were analyzed.

RESULTS: Lesions detected by CE-MRI, IOUS and CE-IOUS were 60, 97 and 85 respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate, false positive rate of CE-MRI were 98.2%, 98.6%, 98.6%, 60.0%, respectively; for IOUS were 50.0%, 90.9%, 1.8%, 1.4%, respectively; and for CE-IOUS were 1.4%, 40.0%, 50.0%, 9.1%, respectively. The operation strategy of 9 (9/50, 18.0%) cases was changed according to the results of CE-IOUS.

CONCLUSION: Compared with CE-MRI, CE-IOUS performs better in detection and differentiation of small metastasis and regenerative nodules. It plays an important role in the decision-making of HCC operation.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions in 317 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to investigate the ability of contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) with the contrast agent SonoVue to differentiate between benign and malignant focal liver lesions.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we examined 317 patients (204 males, 113 females, aged 59 +/- 12 years) with focal liver lesions detected by B-mode gray-scale sonography. After intravenous injection of 1.2 mL SonoVue, the liver was examined continuously for 3 minutes using low-MI sonography with contrast-specific software. Final diagnosis was established by histopathology, CT, MRI, or HIDA-scintigraphy.

RESULTS

Two hundred nine patients had malignant focal lesions, including 107 hepatocellular carcinomas, 70 metastases, 26 cholangiocellular carcinomas, and 6 other types of malignancy. One hundred eight patients had benign focal lesions, including 30 regenerative nodules, 30 hemangiomas, 13 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia, 12 abscesses, 8 cases of necrosis, 7 cases of focal steatosis areas, and 8 other benign lesions. Hypoenhancement or no enhancement in the late phase was found in 91% of the malignant lesions but in only 37% of the benign lesions (p < 0.001, sensitivity = 64%, specificity = 93%). Hyperenhancement in the late phase was found in 20% of the benign lesions but in none of the malignant lesions (p < 0.001, sensitivity = 21%, specificity = 100%). Hyperenhancement in the early phase with diffuse complete enhancement was found in 30% of the patients with malignant lesions but in only 2% of the patients with benign lesions (p < 0.001, sensitivity = 30%, specificity = 98%). CEUS had a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 99%, and an accuracy of 89% in the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is helpful in the differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions.

Detection Of Focal Liver Lesions In Cirrhotic Liver Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Patients with liver cirrhosis are at increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Conventional or baseline ultrasound (BUS) is often used as the first-line tool for HCC surveillance or detection, but the accuracy of BUS in HCC detection or differentiation from other focal liver lesions (FLLs) is limited. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) represents a recent revolution in the field of ultrasonography and it has become increasingly important in the detection and evaluation of FLLs. In CEUS, HCC typically exhibits arterial hyper-enhancement and portal-venous washout represented by hypo-enhanced lesions in the portal venous and late phases. The detection rate of HCC was significantly higher with CEUS compared with BUS. Even regenerative or some dysplastic nodules may exhibit arterial hyper-enhancement as they are differentiated from HCC by its iso-enhancing pattern in portal and late phases. The contrast-enhancement patterns of other different types of benign and malignant FLLs, as well as their detection rates with CEUS, were also discussed.

Usefulness of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with pathological diagnosis and superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance images

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the usefulness of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (Sonazoid-CEUS) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The examination was performed by comparing the images during the Kupffer phase of Sonazoid-CEUS with superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance (SPIO-MRI).

METHODS

The subjects were 48 HCC nodules which were histologically diagnosed (well-differentiated HCC, n=13; moderately differentiated HCC, n=30; poorly differentiated HCC, n=5). We performed Sonazoid-CEUS and SPIO-MRI on all subjects. In the Kupffer phase of Sonazoid-CEUS, the differences in the contrast agent uptake between the tumorous and non-tumorous areas were quantified as the Kupffer phase ratio and compared. In the SPIO-MRI, it was quantified as the SPIO-intensity index. We then compared these results with the histological differentiation of HCCs.

RESULTS

The Kupffer phase ratio decreased as the HCCs became less differentiated (P<0.0001; Kruskal-Wallis test). The SPIO-intensity index also decreased as HCCs became less differentiated (P<0.0001). A positive correlation was found between the Kupffer phase ratio and the SPIO-MRI index (r=0.839). In the Kupffer phase of Sonazoid-CEUS, all of the moderately and poorly differentiated HCCs appeared hypoechoic and were detected as a perfusion defect, whereas the majority (9 of 13 cases, 69.2%) of the well-differentiated HCCs had an isoechoic pattern. The Kupffer phase images of Sonazoid-CEUS and SPIO-MRI matched perfectly (100%) in all of the moderately and poorly differentiated HCCs.

CONCLUSION

Sonazoid-CEUS is useful for estimating histological grading of HCCs. It is a modality that could potentially replace SPIO-MRI.

Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography for evaluation of the enhancement patterns of focal liver tumors in the late phase by intermittent imaging with a high mechanical index

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the enhancement patterns of focal liver tumors in the late phase of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography by intermittent imaging with a high mechanical index (MI).

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with 208 lesions, including 109 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 61 metastases, 30 hemangiomas, and 8 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs), were enrolled in this prospective study. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with intermittent scanning at 2 frames per second (MI, 0.7-1.2) was conducted in the late phase (>5 minutes after bolus intravenous injection of the perflubutane-based contrast agent Sonazoid; Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan). Two blinded readers classified the enhancement patterns of the lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of the dominant enhancement patterns and inter-reader agreement were assessed.

RESULTS

A combination of diffuse enhancement with intratumoral vessels and intratumoral vessels alone yielded sensitivity of 85% (average of both readers), specificity of 88%, and a PPV of 88% for HCC. For metastasis, a combination of peripheral ringlike enhancement with peritumoral vessels and peripheral ringlike enhancement with intratumoral vessels yielded sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 95%, and a PPV of 85%. For hemangiomas, a combination of peripheral nodular enhancement with peritumoral vessels and peripheral nodular enhancement without peritumoral vessels yielded sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 99%, and a PPV of 92%. Diffuse enhancement with spoked wheel arteries yielded sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, and a PPV of 87% for FNHs. Good inter-reader agreement was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography using intermittent imaging with a high MI can potentially be used for evaluating the enhancement patterns of focal liver tumors in the late phase.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions of the spleen

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue (Bracco SpA, Milan, Italy), a sulfur hexafluoride microbubble contrast agent, to reveal differences between benign and malignant focal splenic lesions.

METHODS

In a prospective study we investigated 35 lesions in 35 patients (24 male and 11 female; mean age +/- SD, 54 +/- 15 years) with focal splenic lesions detected by B-mode ultrasonography. After intravenous injection of 1.2 to 2.4 mL of SonoVue, the spleen was examined continuously for 3 minutes using low-mechanical index ultrasonography with contrast-specific software. The final diagnosis was established by histologic examination, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

In 14 patients, the splenic lesions were malignant (metastasis, n = 6; non-Hodgkin lymphoma, n = 6; and Hodgkin lymphoma, n = 2). In 21 patients, the focal splenic lesions were benign (ischemic lesion, n = 6; echogenic cyst, n = 5; abscess, n = 4; hemangioma, n = 3; hematoma, n = 1; hemophagocytosis syndrome, n = 1; and splenoma, n = 1. Typical findings for benign lesions were 2 arrival patterns: no contrast enhancement (neither in the early nor in the parenchymal phase; P < .05) and the beginning of contrast enhancement in the early phase followed by contrast enhancement in the parenchymal phase 60 seconds after injection. In contrast, the combination of contrast enhancement in the early phase followed by rapid wash-out and demarcation of the lesion without contrast enhancement in the parenchymal phase (60 seconds after injection) was typical for malignant lesions (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is helpful in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions of the spleen.

How to characterize non-hypervascular hepatic nodules on contrast-enhanced computed tomography in chronic liver disease: feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with a microbubble contrast agent

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although hypervascular appearance is characteristic in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic nodules without hypervascular appearance are sometimes found in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The aim of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with Levovist to characterize small, non-hypervascular hepatic nodules on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in patients with CLD.

METHODS

The subject was 41 hepatic nodules (<30 mm, 18.5 +/- 5.6 mm) which showed non-hypervascular appearance on CECT in 35 patients with CLD; their histological results were 31 HCC (15 well, 14 moderate, and two poor) and 10 regenerative nodules (RN). CEUS with Levovist was performed under intermittent scanning (1-s interval) using APLIO at the early phase and the liver-specific phase, and the contrast enhancement of the nodule was assessed in comparison to that of the surrounding liver parenchyma. The contrast-enhanced findings with the time-intensity analysis were compared with the histological results.

RESULTS

Twelve nodules with weak enhancement in the liver-specific phase were HCC, regardless of their early-phase appearances. The other 29 nodules with equivalent or weak enhancement in the early phase and equivalent enhancement in the liver-specific phase were 19 HCC and 10 RN. Among them, the maximum-intensity ratio of tumor to non-tumor in the early phase was significantly higher in HCC than in RN (P < 0.01, n = 16), and the receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed a sensitivity of 1.0 and a specificity of 0.83 for their characterization.

CONCLUSION

CEUS with Levovist may be an alternative to biopsy to characterize small, non-hypervascular hepatic nodules on CECT in patients with CLD.

Current role of ultrasound for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a decisive influence on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients. Although α-fetoprotein (AFP) is a known and specific tumor maker for HCC, it is not suitable for the screening and surveillance of HCC because of its poor predictive value and low sensitivity. The use of imaging modalities is essential for the screening, diagnosis and treatment of HCC. Ultrasound (US) plays a major role among them, because it provides real-time and non-invasive observation by a simple and easy technique. In addition, US-guided needle puncture methods are frequently required for the diagnosis and/or treatment process of HCC. The development of digital technology has led to the detection of blood flow by color Doppler US, and the sensitivity for detecting tumor vascularity has shown remarkable improvement with the introduction of microbubble contrast agents. Moreover, near real-time 3-dimensional US images are now available. As for the treatment of HCC, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) was developed as a novel technology that provides a transcutaneous ablation effect without needle puncture. These advancements in the US field have led to rapid progress in HCC management, and continuing advances are expected. This article reviews the current application of US for HCC in clinical practice.

Improved characterisation of solitary solid pancreatic tumours using contrast enhanced transabdominal ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a new imaging method for detection and characterisation of liver tumours. The role of CEUS in pancreatic disease is less obvious. We prospectively evaluated CEUS for characterization of undetermined solid pancreatic lesions (gold standard histology).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 112 solitary undetermined pancreatic masses (70 ductal adenocarcinoma and 42 neoplastic nodules of other origin) were prospectively examined in patients without metastatic disease using transabdominal ultrasound. Tumour enhancing features were analyzed in comparison to the surrounding pancreatic parenchyma in patients with adequate visualisation.

RESULTS

The sign of iso-hypervascularity as a sign of non-ductal adenocarcinoma showed a sensitivity of 100%, specifity of 90% and accuracy of 93.8%. The sign of hypovascularity as a sign of ductal adenocarcinoma showed a sensitivity of 90%, specifity of 100% and an accuracy of 93.8%.

CONCLUSION

CEUS allows differential diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma and non-ductal adenocarcinoma (mainly neuroendocrine tumours and (microcystic) serous pancreatic adenoma) in the most of cases.

Focal liver lesions: role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound

The introduction of microbubble contrast agents and the development of contrast-specific techniques have opened new possibilities in liver imaging. Initially, only intermittent imaging with Doppler detection was available. Second-generation contrast agents and low mechanical index real-time scanning techniques are decisive advances that enable convenient liver examinations with high sensitivity and specificity. Hepatic lesions usually show typical perfusion and enhancement patterns through the various contrast phases, which help their characterization. Several published studies and the daily clinical routine show that, as opposed to conventional ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced US can substantially improve detection and differentiation of focal liver lesions. Today, contrast-enhanced US is the dynamic imaging modality of choice for differentiation of focal liver lesions. Contrast uptake patterns of the most relevant liver lesions, as well as important clinical indications are presented and discussed.

Diagnosis and management of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is the second most common benign tumor of the liver, after hemangioma. It is generally found incidentally and is most common in reproductive-aged women, but it also affects males and can be diagnosed at any age. Patients are rarely symptomatic, but FNH sometimes causes epigastric or right upper quadrant pain. The main clinical task is to differentiate it from other hypervascular hepatic lesions such as hepatic adenoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, or hypervascular metastases, but invasive diagnostic procedures can generally be avoided with the appropriate use of imaging techniques. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is more sensitive and specific than conventional ultrasonography (US) or computed tomography (CT), but Doppler US and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) can greatly improve the accuracy in the diagnosis of FNH. Once a correct diagnosis has been made, in most cases there is no indication for surgery, and treatment includes conservative clinical follow-up in asymptomatic patients.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of histologically proven liver hemangiomas

Differentiation of small and atypical hemangiomas from other hepatic masses using imaging methods can be difficult, especially in patients with underlying malignant disease. Therefore, contrast-enhanced ultrasound was assessed in patients with histologically confirmed hemangiomas with respect to contrast-enhancing kinetics and tumor characteristics. In 58 patients with indeterminate hepatic lesions demonstrated with at least 2 imaging methods (ultrasound/computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), ultrasound-guided liver biopsy revealed hemangioma. In all patients a hepatic neoplasm had been suspected because of underlying malignant disease (n=41), liver cirrhosis (n=15), or growth of the lesion (n=2). All patients underwent nonlinear, low mechanical index real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound scanning with bolus injections of SonoVue. Peripheral nodular arterial enhancement was detected in 43 patients (74%), whereas the typical metastatic peripheral rim-like enhancement was not observed at all. Strong homogenous arterial enhancement was found in 9 of 58 (16%) patients. In 6 patients (10%), the arterial contrast enhancement pattern could not be determined because of the very small size of the lesions or fibrotic nodules. Forty-five (78%) of the hemangiomas showed homogenous centripetal filling within 180 seconds.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound demonstrates typical hemangioma imaging characteristics, that is, peripheral nodular contrast enhancement and iris-diaphragm sign in a high percentage of patients with undetermined lesions. This technique may therefore improve noninvasive functional characterization and differentiation of hemangiomas.

Recent applications of ultrasound: diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Ultrasound (US) has the advantages of real-time observation, simple technique, and a noninvasive procedure compared to other imaging modalities. The recent development of digital technologies has enabled the observation of sonograms with improved signal-to-noise ratio, penetration, and spatial and contrast resolutions. Furthermore, microbubble contrast agents have increased the diagnostic ability of US examination, and the use of three-dimensional sonograms is now not unusual. These advances have furthered the usefulness of US for liver tumors in clinical practice. This article reviews the recent applications of US in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Microbubble disappearance-time is the appropriate timing for liver-specific imaging after injection of Levovist

Contrast enhancement in the portal vein was repeatedly observed at 1 min intervals with wide-band Doppler ultrasonography in 152 consecutive patients (132 with liver cirrhosis and HCC, 20 controls), 5 min after the injection of Levovist. The duration time of contrast enhancement in the portal vein (microbubble disappearance-time; MD-T) was measured in all patients and contrast-enhanced appearances were compared between the 5 min phase and MD-T phase in 68 HCC nodules. MD-T in patients with liver cirrhosis (572.4 +/- 117.9 s) was significantly longer than in controls (481.6 +/- 89.3 s, p < 0.05). MD-T was prolonged in patients with Child B and C compared with Child A (p < 0.05). The contrast-enhanced appearances between the two phases were different in 30 of 68 HCC nodules (44.1%), showing positive enhancement in the 5 min phase and negative enhancement in the MD-T phase. The proposed MD-T may become an essential factor for the evaluation of liver-specific sonograms.

Characterization of hypoechoic focal hepatic lesions in patients with fatty liver: diagnostic performance and confidence of contrast-enhanced ultrasound

The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to characterize hypoechoic focal hepatic lesions (HFHL) in fatty liver (FL). A study group of 105 patients with FL and 105 HFHLs (52 malignant and 53 benign) underwent CEUS after SonoVue administration. Two blinded readers independently reviewed baseline ultrasound (US) and CEUS scans and classified each lesion as malignant or benign on a five-point scale of confidence, and recorded whether further imaging work-up was needed. Sensitivity, specificity, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (A (z)), and interobserver agreement were calculated. We observed that the diagnostic confidence improved after reviewing CEUS scans for both readers (A (z)=0.706 and 0.999 and A (z)=0.665 and 0.990 at baseline US and CEUS, respectively; p<0.0001). Inter-reader agreement increased (weighted k=0.748 at baseline US vs. 0.882 at CEUS). For both readers, after CEUS, the occurrence of correctly characterized lesions increased (from 27/105 [27.5%] to 94/105 [89.5%], and from 19/105 [18.1%] to 93/105 [88.6%], respectively; p<0.0001) and the need for further imaging decreased (from 93/105 [88.6%] to 26/105 [24.8%], and from 96/105 [91.4%] to 40/105 [38.1%], respectively; p<0.0001). We conclude that CEUS improves the diagnostic performance of radiologists in the characterization of HFHLs in FL and reduces the need for further imaging work-up.

Small hepatic nodules (< or =2 cm) in cirrhosis patients: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

AIM

We evaluated the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for the characterization of small hepatic nodules (< or =2 cm) in cirrhosis patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty cirrhosis patients with 30 hepatic nodules (1-2 cm) were enrolled in this study. Eighteen hepatic nodules were hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and 12 were benign lesions. CEUS was performed using microbubble contrast (Levovist). With surrounding hepatic parenchyma as a reference, two characteristics of hepatic nodules, including arterial phase enhancement (AE) and the absence of delayed phase enhancement (ADE), were evaluated as criteria for the diagnosis of HCC. A radiologist independently reviewed the dynamic computed tomographies (CT) of 26 hepatic nodules.

RESULTS

CEUS showed AE in 15 nodules (13 HCC and two benign) and ADE in 17 lesions (14 HCC and three benign). For HCC, the coincidental AE of both CEUS and dynamic CT was 40%. Using both AE and ADE for HCC diagnosis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 55.6%, 91.7%, 70%, 90.9% and 57.9%, respectively. When using either AE or ADE for HCC diagnosis, the same parameters were 94.4%, 66.7%, 83.3%, 81% and 88.9%, respectively. One benign hepatic nodule with both AE and ADE was diagnosed as HCC 29 months after the CEUS study.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of characteristics of AE and ADE as determined by CEUS was highly specific for small HCCs in cirrhosis patients. Concurrent delayed phase imaging is useful in the diagnosis of small hypovascular HCCs.

Ring-shaped appearance in liver-specific image with Levovist: a characteristic enhancement pattern for hypervascular benign nodule in the liver of heavy drinkers

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim was to clarify the features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with Levovist for diagnosis of hypervascular benign nodules in the liver of heavy drinkers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven heavy drinkers with hypervascular nodules in the liver were studied. Findings of CEUS with Levovist (wide-band Doppler, 7/7), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT, 7/7) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 5/7) were compared for one nodule in each patient.

RESULTS

Diagnosis of all seven nodules on CECT was HCC, whereas pathological results were HCC for four nodules and benign lesion for three nodules. The former four showed compatible findings for HCC on CEUS (4/4) and MRI (2/4). However, the latter three showed characteristic liver-specific sonograms with a ring-shaped appearance--peripheral enhancement with a central non-enhanced area. Two of the three nodules showed decreased signal-intensity in the periphery on SPIO-enhanced MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

The ring-shaped appearance on liver-specific sonograms with Levovist may be a useful sign for the differential diagnosis of hypervascular benign nodule from HCC in heavy drinkers.

Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value and potential impact of SonoVue-enhanced sonography in the characterization of focal liver lesions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study included 127 patients with 82 malignant and 52 benign lesions in the liver. Contrast-enhanced sonography was performed using nonlinear imaging modes at low mechanical index (0.1-0.3) to enable real-time visualization of arterial, portal, and late-phase enhancement. Digital recordings of unenhanced sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography were reviewed by on-site investigators and two off-site blinded interpreters. The final diagnosis was based on consensus interpreting of all examinations by another two expert observers with access to CT, MRI, and histologic data; the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced sonography in identifying the lesion as benign, malignant, or indeterminate and as actual tumor type was compared with baseline sonography.

RESULTS

For on-site investigators, contrast-enhanced sonography reduced the number of indeterminate diagnoses by 67% and improved the sensitivity and specificity to 90.2% and 80.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). For off-site interpreters, contrast-enhanced sonography reduced the number of indeterminate diagnoses by 51-56% (p < 0.001); significantly improved sensitivity and specificity to 90.8-95.4% and 83.7-89.8%, respectively (p < 0.001); eliminated observers' variability (kappa coefficient: 0.66-0.77); and showed no significant difference in all comparisons in the analysis of lesions measuring less than 1.5 cm, 1.5-2.5 cm, and all sizes combined. Contrast-enhanced sonography did not rely on availability of clinical history to enable the diagnoses, and it reduced the need for further imaging investigations 23.7% to 90.4%.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced sonography improves the characterization of focal liver lesions and may limit the need for further investigations.

Comparison of visual and quantitative analysis for characterization of insonated liver tumors after microbubble contrast injection

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to compare diagnostic performance of visual and quantitative analysis for the characterization of liver tumors insonated at low transmit power after microbubble contrast agent injection.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This series comprised 166 liver tumors (1-5 cm in diameter) in 166 patients (99 men, 67 women; mean age +/- SD, 58 +/- 11 years) scanned at low transmit power (mechanical index: 0.1-0.14) after sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble injection. Digital cine clips recorded at the arterial phase (10-40 sec after contrast injection) and late phase (100-300 sec) were analyzed to characterize liver tumors as benign or malignant. Visual analysis was performed by three independent blinded reviewers who evaluated enhancement patterns at the arterial phase and subjective tumor conspicuity at the late phase. Quantitative analysis of videotape intensity (VI: gray-scale levels, 0-255) was performed to calculate objective tumor conspicuity at the late phase: (VI(tumor) - VI(liver)) / VI(liver).

RESULTS

Characteristic enhancement patterns were observed in malignant tumors (peripheral rimlike) and benign tumors (peripheral nodular or central and spoke-wheel-shaped). Malignant (n = 95) versus benign (n = 71) tumors differed for subjective (median value: -1 vs 1, respectively) and objective conspicuity at the late phase (-0.6 vs 0.15, respectively; p = 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) due to persistent microbubble uptake in benign tumors. Diagnostic performance of visual (odds ratio: reviewer 1 = 4.28, reviewer 2 = 10.18, reviewer 3 = 9.56) and quantitative (odds ratio: 89.33) analyses differed significantly in the characterization of liver tumors (p = 0.01, chi-square test).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative analysis revealed higher diagnostic performance than visual analysis to characterize liver tumors insonated at low transmit power after microbubble contrast agent injection.

Real-time harmonic contrast material-specific US of focal liver lesions

Recent advances in contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) mainly include (a) development of low-acoustic-pressure (low-mechanical-index) harmonic software, capable of obtaining real-time images without disrupting contrast material microbubbles, and (b) commercialization of new contrast media ("second-generation" contrast media), capable of producing intense echo signals in this low-mechanical-index setting. With use of low-mechanical-index continuous-mode contrast-enhanced US, the circulatory kinetic models of various focal liver lesions can be displayed dynamically. Hepatic lesions usually have typical perfusion characteristics and enhancement patterns through the various phases of parenchymal enhancement, which helps characterize lesions and, in most cases, allows definitive diagnosis, even among lesions that exhibit very similar baseline appearances. Because of the use of harmonic technologies at low emission frequencies, there is some loss of spatial resolution and overall image quality, typically resulting in a grainy appearance. In addition, lesion depth affects the detectability of vascularity to some degree in that poor signal arises from deep-seated lesions. Moreover, liver attenuation (eg, in patients with steatosis or chronic liver disease) further reduces the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced US. Nevertheless, with its unique capacity to provide images in real time, low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced US is the dynamic imaging modality of choice in the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions.

Characterization of benign hepatic tumors arising in fatty liver with SonoVue and pulse inversion US

BACKGROUND

We describe the spectrum of contrast-enhancement patterns of benign hepatic tumors arising in fatty liver on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US).

METHODS

Sixteen patients (12 women and four men) with 27 benign hepatic tumors (17 hemangiomas, eight focal nodular hyperplasias, and two hepatocellular adenomas) arising in fatty liver underwent baseline and pulse inversion US after administration of SonoVue. Two experienced radiologists evaluated baseline echogenicity and dynamic enhancement pattern of each lesion in comparison with adjacent liver parenchyma.

RESULTS

After administration of SonoVue, in the arterial phase 13 of 17 hemangiomas showed peripheral globular enhancement and one showed a rim of peripheral enhancement, followed by progressive centripetal fill-in, which was complete in 10 of 14 cases and incomplete in four. Three of 18 hemangiomas showed rapid and complete fill-in in the arterial phase. Eight of eight focal nodular hyperplasias became hyperechoic in comparison with adjacent liver parenchyma in the arterial phase and slightly hyperechoic or isoechoic in the portal venous and delayed phases. Both adenomas showed strong arterial contrast enhancement that became less intense in the portal venous and delayed phases.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced US after administration of SonoVue enables depiction of typical contrast-enhancement patterns in most benign hepatic tumors arising in fatty liver, thus providing useful clues for characterization.

Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI

AIM: To evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using SonoVue^® in the detection of liver metastases in patients with known extrahepatic primary tumors versus the combined gold standard comprising CT, MRI and clinical/histological data.

METHODS: It is an international multicenter study, and there were 12 centres and 125 patients (64 males, 61 females, aged 59 ± 11 years) involved, with 102 patients per protocol. Primary tumors were colorectal in 35 %, breast in 27 %, pancreatic in 17 % and others in 21 %. CEUS using SonoVue^® was employed with a low-mechanical-index technique and contrast-specific software using Siemens Elegra, Philips HDI 5000 and Acuson Sequoia; continuous scanning for at least five minutes.

RESULTS: CEUS with SonoVue^® increased significantly the number of focal liver lesions detected versus unenhanced sonography. In 31.4 % of the patients, more lesions were found after contrast enhancement. The total numbers of lesions detected were comparable with CEUS (55), triple-phase spiral CT (61) and MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent (53). Accuracy of detection of metastatic disease (i.e. at least one metastatic lesion) was significantly higher for CEUS (91.2 %) than for unenhanced sonography (81.4 %) and was similar to that of triple-phase spiral CT (89.2 %). In 53 patients whose CEUS examination was negative, a follow-up examination 3-6 mo later confirmed the absence of metastatic lesions in 50 patients (94.4 %).

CONCLUSION: CEUS is proved to be reliable in the detection of liver metastases in patients with known extrahepatic primary tumors and suspected liver lesions.

Evaluation of pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: comparison with pathology on resected specimen

Features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) observed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) were compared to pathological features of corresponding resected HCC specimens, to evaluate the ability of CEUS to depict the pathological features of HCC. We investigated 50 HCC nodules that were treated by surgical resection. All nodules had been examined by CEUS with intravenous contrast agent (Levovist) before surgery. CEUS findings were divided into three phases for evaluation and classification of enhancement patterns: two vascular phases (arterial phase and portal venous phase) and the delayed phase. Pathological examination focused on differentiation and on the presence or absence of a tumor capsule, intratumoral septum, and intratumoral necrosis. All 21 nodules that showed a linear or annular vessel around the tumor margin in the arterial phase had capsular formation. Of the 27 nodules that showed heterogeneous perfusion in the portal venous phase, 21 (77.8%) had an intratumoral septum and 23 (85.2%) showed intratumoral necrosis. All nodules that were depicted as a defect with an unclear margin in the delayed phase were well-differentiated HCCs, whereas all nodules that were depicted as a defect with a clear margin were moderately or poorly differentiated HCCs. From our observations, the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases of CEUS could reflect different pathological aspects of HCC. Some pathological characteristics of HCC might be evaluated preoperatively and non-invasively, by means of combined analysis of three phases of CEUS findings.

Importance of evaluating all vascular phases on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of a blood-pool sonographic contrast agent in the late phase compared with the three vascular phases for differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In 152 patients (105 with chronic liver disease), 152 solid focal liver lesions characterized either by fine-needle biopsy or by dynamic CT or MRI were studied. The final diagnoses were metastasis for 24, hepatocellular carcinoma for 75, focal nodular hyperplasia for 13, regenerating or dysplastic nodule for 14, hemangioma for 22, cholangiocarcinoma for two, and another focal liver lesion for two. Real-time sonography was performed after a bolus injection of 2.4 mL of SonoVue, using a low mechanical index (< 0.2). All lesions were evaluated in the arterial, portal, and late phases; classified as benign or malignant; and correlated with final diagnoses.

RESULTS

For discrimination between malignant and benign focal liver lesions, evaluation of all vascular phases improved the sensitivity from 78.4% to 98% and the accuracy from 80.9% to 92.7%, compared with evaluation of the late phase alone. The increase in accuracy was higher in patients with chronic liver disease (16.3%) than in those without (2.1%).

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of SonoVue enhancement in all three vascular phases is superior to evaluation of SonoVue enhancement in the late phase alone, especially in patients with chronic liver disease.

Comparison of IV Contrast-Enhanced Sonography and Histopathology of Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We compared contrast-enhanced sonography findings with pathologic findings in pancreatic cancer to evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced sonography to depict the pathologic changes associated with pancreatic cancer.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgery were investigated. Sonography was performed with contrast material (Levovist) for all patients before surgery. Pathologic findings were evaluated on the basis of the resected cancer specimens. We compared contrast-enhanced sonography findings with pathologic findings.

RESULTS

All tumors that were hyperechoic on contrast-enhanced sonography were papillary adenocarcinoma, and all tumors that were hypoechoic on contrast-enhanced sonography were ductal adenocarcinoma. Among ductal adenocarcinomas, five (71.4%) of seven tumors for which the size of the hypoechoic area was unchanged on contrast-enhanced sonography had clear tumor margins with no infiltration or inflammation in the margin. In contrast, all tumors for which the size of the hypoechoic area was reduced on contrast-enhanced sonography had unclear tumor margins with infiltration of cancerous cells and inflammation. Nine (90%) of 10 tumors that showed partial contrast enhancement or a vascular shadow in a hypoechoic area had large or medium-sized vessels within a tumor at pathology. In contrast, only one (4.8%) of 21 tumors that did not show the vascular shadow in a hypoechoic area had no large or medium-sized vessels in a tumor.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced sonography well reflects the pathologic changes of pancreatic cancer and will provide useful information in a pretreatment evaluation. Further studies with a large number of patients will be required to confirm this finding.

Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Non-invasive differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) is difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced phase inversion ultrasound to differentiate between histologically proven FNH and HCA, analysing the arterial and (early) portal venous phase. 32 patients with histological proven FNH (n=24) or HCA (n=8) have been included in this prospective study. Examination technique: Siemens Elegra, phase inversion harmonic imaging (PIHI) with low mechanical index (MI)<0.2-0.3 using SonoVue (BR 1). The contrast enhancing tumour characteristics were evaluated during the hepatic arterial (starting 8-22 s) and early portal venous phase (starting 12-30 s). The image analysis was performed by three examiners. In 23 of 24 patients with FNH the contrast pattern revealed pronounced arterial and (early) portal venous enhancement. Homogeneous enhancement was detected during the hepatic arterial phase in all eight patients with HCA. In contrast to patients with FNH, no enhancement was seen during the portal venous phase. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced phase inversion ultrasound demonstrated pronounced arterial and portal venous enhancement in patients with focal nodular hyperplasia. In contrast, after homogeneous enhancement during hepatic arterial phase, no enhancement during hepatic portal venous phase was detected in patients with hepatocellular adenoma. Therefore, this technique might improve the functional characterization of benign hypervascular focal liver lesions.