Increase in Utilization of Percutaneous Renal Artery Interventions by Medicare Beneficiaries, 1996–2000

Updated trends in percutaneous renal arteriography among radiologists and other specialties

PURPOSE

Prior studies have demonstrated an overall decline in percutaneous renal artery angioplasty with and without stenting from 1988 to 2009. We evaluated the recent utilization trends in percutaneous renal arteriography (PTRA) among radiologists and non-radiologist providers from 2010 to 2018.

METHODS

Data from the 2010-2018 nationwide Medicare Part B fee-for-service database were used to tabulate case volumes for PTRA. Annual utilization rates per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated and aggregated based on physician specialty: radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, general surgeons, or others.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2018, the overall utilization rate of PTRA markedly declined (-72% change; from 15.5 to 4.3 cases per 10,000 Medicare beneficiaries). Proportionally, the cardiologist share of PTRA saw the greatest decline, falling from 74% market share in 2010 (11.4/15.5 cases) to only 36% market share in 2018 (1.6/4.3 cases). The market share of PTRA performed by radiologists grew from 12% market share in 2010 (1.9/15.5 cases) to 28% in 2018 (1.2/4.3 cases); despite this, the absolute number of PTRA performed by radiologists saw a smaller decline over this period (-34%; 1.9 to 1.2 cases).

CONCLUSION

The total utilization rates of PTRA in the Medicare population has continued to decline from 2010 to 2018, likely due to clinical trials suggesting limited efficacy of angioplasty and stenting in the treatment of renovascular hypertension and other factors such as declining reimbursement. The overall and per-specialty rates continue to decline, reflecting an overarching trend away from procedural management of renovascular hypertension.

Vein Graft Aneurysm after Aorto-Renal Bypass for Childhood Renovascular Hypertension Due to Fibromuscular Dysplasia

Renovascular hypertension (RVHT) is a major cause of surgically correctable secondary hypertension. Refractory hypertension despite multiple antihypertensive drugs requires angioplasty, surgical revascularization, or even nephrectomy. Herein, we report a pediatric patient who had been treated with angioplasty, nephrectomy, and aortorenal bypass surgery for RVHT due to fibromuscular dysplasia and re-do endoaneurysmal graft replacement for a vein graft aneurysm. This case highlights the various treatment modalities for RVHT and the recurrent nature of the disease with a rare presentation of a vein graft aneurysm after aortorenal bypass.

Unilateral renal artery stenosis causing hypertensive flash pulmonary oedema

Flash pulmonary oedema can occur as a result of multiple triggers that may act independently or in concert. One such precipitating factor is bilateral renal artery stenosis which can be treated either with revascularisation or with medical therapy. Unilateral renal artery stenosis, however, is a rare cause of flash pulmonary oedema, especially when the contralateral kidney is still functional. We describe a case of an elderly woman with a history of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and multiple hospitalisations for hypertensive crisis and flash pulmonary oedema who was found to have right, ostial renal artery stenosis that was treated with stent placement.

Inflammation and Oxidative Damage in Ischaemic Renal Disease

Ischaemic renal disease as result of atherosclerotic renovascular disease activates a complex biological response that ultimately leads to fibrosis and chronic kidney disease. Large randomised control trials have shown that renal revascularisation in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery disease does not confer any additional benefit to medical therapy alone. This is likely related to the activation of complex pathways of oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines and fibrosis due to atherosclerotic disease and hypoxic injury due to reduced renal blood flow. New evidence from pre-clinical trials now indicates a role for specific targeted therapeutic interventions to counteract this complex pathogenesis. This evidence now suggests that the focus for those with atherosclerotic renovascular disease should be a combination of revascularisation and renoprotective therapies that target the renal tissue response to ischaemia, reduce the inflammatory infiltrate and prevent or reduce the fibrosis.

Österreichischer Blutdruckkonsens 2019

Erhöhter Blutdruck bleibt eine Hauptursache von kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, Behinderung und frühzeitiger Sterblichkeit in Österreich, wobei die Raten an Diagnose, Behandlung und Kontrolle auch in rezenten Studien suboptimal sind. Das Management von Bluthochdruck ist eine häufige Herausforderung für Ärztinnen und Ärzte vieler Fachrichtungen. In einem Versuch, diagnostische und therapeutische Strategien zu standardisieren und letztendlich die Rate an gut kontrollierten Hypertoniker/innen zu erhöhen und dadurch kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen zu verhindern, haben 13 österreichische medizinische Fachgesellschaften die vorhandene Evidenz zur Prävention, Diagnose, Abklärung, Therapie und Konsequenzen erhöhten Blutdrucks gesichtet. Das hier vorgestellte Ergebnis ist der erste Österreichische Blutdruckkonsens. Die Autoren und die beteiligten Fachgesellschaften sind davon überzeugt, daß es einer gemeinsamen nationalen Anstrengung bedarf, die Blutdruck-assoziierte Morbidität und Mortalität in unserem Land zu verringern.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Renovascular Hypertension

Renovascular disease (RVD) remains a major cause of secondary and treatment-resistant hypertension. Most cases are related either to fibromuscular or atherosclerotic lesions, but a variety of other causes including arterial dissection, stent occlusion, and embolic disease can produce the same syndrome. Recent studies emphasize the kidney's tolerance to moderate flow reduction during antihypertensive drug therapy and the relative safety of medical therapy to control blood pressure. Several prospective trials in moderate RVD fail to identify major benefits from endovascular revascularization for moderate atherosclerotic disease. However, high-risk and progressive renovascular syndromes are recognized to be relatively refractory to medical therapy only and respond better to combining renal revascularization with ongoing medical therapy. Clinicians caring for complex hypertension should be familiar with pathogenic pathways, imaging techniques, and a rational approach to managing renovascular hypertension in the current era.

Issues related to renal artery angioplasty and stenting

Renal artery stenosis may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of secondary hypertension, renal dysfunction, and flash pulmonary edema. Currently correction of renal arterial inflow stenosis is reserved for resistant hypertension patients who have failed maximal medical therapy, have worsening renal function and/or unexplained proximal congestive failure. With the recent advances in minimally invasive percutaneous stent placement techniques, open surgical revascularization has been largely replaced by renal artery stenting. The potential benefit of revascularization seemed intuitive; however, the initial enthusiasm and rise in the number of percutaneous interventions have been tempered by many subsequent negative randomized clinical trials that failed to prove the proposed benefits of the percutaneous intervention. The negative randomized trial results have fallen under scrutiny due to trial design concerns and inconsistent outcomes of these studies compared to pivotal trials undertaken under US Food and Drug Administration scrutiny. Treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery occlusive disease has become one of the most debatable topics in the field of vascular disease. The results from recent randomized clinical trials of renal artery stenting have basically limited the utilization of the procedure in many centers, but not every clinical scenario was covered in those trials. There are potential areas for improvement focusing mainly on procedural details and patient selection with respect to catheter based treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. We believe, limiting patient selection, enrollment criteria and outcomes measured functioned to reduce the benefit of renal artery stenosis stenting by not enrolling patients likely to benefit. Future studies incorporating potential procedural improvements and that include patients more likely to benefit from renal stenting than were included in ASTRAL and CORAL are needed to more carefully examine specific patient subgroups so that “the baby is not thrown out with the bath water.” We also discuss several other concerns related to renal artery stenting which include diagnostic, procedure, indication, and reimbursement issues.

Issues related to renal artery angioplasty and stenting

Renal artery stenosis may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of secondary hypertension, renal dysfunction, and flash pulmonary edema. Currently correction of renal arterial inflow stenosis is reserved for resistant hypertension patients who have failed maximal medical therapy, have worsening renal function and/or unexplained proximal congestive failure. With the recent advances in minimally invasive percutaneous stent placement techniques, open surgical revascularization has been largely replaced by renal artery stenting. The potential benefit of revascularization seemed intuitive; however, the initial enthusiasm and rise in the number of percutaneous interventions have been tempered by many subsequent negative randomized clinical trials that failed to prove the proposed benefits of the percutaneous intervention. The negative randomized trial results have fallen under scrutiny due to trial design concerns and inconsistent outcomes of these studies compared to pivotal trials undertaken under US Food and Drug Administration scrutiny. Treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery occlusive disease has become one of the most debatable topics in the field of vascular disease. The results from recent randomized clinical trials of renal artery stenting have basically limited the utilization of the procedure in many centers, but not every clinical scenario was covered in those trials. There are potential areas for improvement focusing mainly on procedural details and patient selection with respect to catheter based treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. We believe, limiting patient selection, enrollment criteria and outcomes measured functioned to reduce the benefit of renal artery stenosis stenting by not enrolling patients likely to benefit. Future studies incorporating potential procedural improvements and that include patients more likely to benefit from renal stenting than were included in ASTRAL and CORAL are needed to more carefully examine specific patient subgroups so that "the baby is not thrown out with the bath water." We also discuss several other concerns related to renal artery stenting which include diagnostic, procedure, indication, and reimbursement issues.

A Novel Technique of Stenting of the Renal Artery In-Stent Restenosis with GuideLiner® through Radial Approach

In-stent restenosis of the renal arteries is relatively common and its management is not well studied. An 83-year-old female with bilateral renal artery stenosis and balloon angioplasty and stenting bilaterally one year ago was found to have recurrent severe elevations in the blood pressure despite medical management. Renal artery duplex showed 60–99% stenosis of the right renal artery and 20–59% stenosis of the left renal artery. A subsequent angiography of the right renal artery revealed 80% in-stent restenosis at the ostium. We describe a new approach of balloon angioplasty and stenting through radial access site with the assistance of a GuideLiner in a complex in-stent restenosis of the renal artery.

Management of Renovascular Hypertension

Renal artery stenosis is a potentially reversible cause of hypertension, and transcatheter techniques are essential to its treatment. Angioplasty remains a first-line treatment for stenosis secondary to fibromuscular dysplasia. Renal artery stenting is commonly used in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, although recent trials have cast doubts upon its efficacy. Renal denervation is a promising procedure for the treatment of resistant hypertension, and in the future, its indications may expand.

Update on intervention versus medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is known to be one of the most common causes of secondary hypertension, and early nonrandomized studies suggested that renal artery stenting (RASt) improved outcomes. The vascular community embraced this less invasive treatment alternative to surgery, and RASt increased in popularity during the late 1990s. However, recent randomized studies have failed to show a benefit regarding blood pressure or renal function when RASt was compared with best medical therapy, creating significant concerns about procedural efficacy. In the wake of these randomized trial results, hypertension and renal disease experts along with vascular interventional specialists now struggle with how to best manage atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. This review objectively analyzes the current literature and highlights each trial's design weaknesses and strengths. We have provided our recommendations for contemporary treatment guidelines based on our interpretation of the available empirical data.

Paradigm Shifts in Atherosclerotic Renovascular Disease: Where Are We Now?

Results of recent clinical trials and experimental studies indicate that whereas atherosclerotic renovascular disease can accelerate both systemic hypertension and tissue injury in the poststenotic kidney, restoring vessel patency alone is insufficient to recover kidney function for most subjects. Kidney injury in atherosclerotic renovascular disease reflects complex interactions among vascular rarefication, oxidative stress injury, and recruitment of inflammatory cellular elements that ultimately produce fibrosis. Classic paradigms for simply restoring blood flow are shifting to implementation of therapy targeting mitochondria and cell-based functions to allow regeneration of vascular, glomerular, and tubular structures sufficient to recover, or at least stabilize, renal function. These developments offer exciting possibilities of repair and regeneration of kidney tissue that may limit progressive CKD in atherosclerotic renovascular disease and may apply to other conditions in which inflammatory injury is a major common pathway.

From the 1990s to CORAL (Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions) trial results and beyond: does stenting have a role in ischemic nephropathy?

The prevalence of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is high, ∼7% in individuals older than 65 years and ∼50% in patients with diffuse arterial disease, and it is increasingly frequent in an aging population. About 10% to 15% of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis cases lead to the development of resistant hypertension and/or ischemic nephropathy. The management of ischemic nephropathy may include medical therapy and/or revascularization. In the past, revascularization required surgical bypass or endarterectomy, accompanied by the morbidity and mortality associated with a major surgical procedure. During the last few decades, less invasive endovascular procedures such as percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty with stent placement have become available. At the same time, new antihypertensive and cardiovascular drugs have been developed, which may preclude revascularization, at least in some cases. The indications of each of these therapeutic options have changed over time. This review offers a temporal perspective on the course of technical and scientific advances and the accompanying change in clinical practice for the treatment of ischemic nephropathy. The latest randomized clinical trials, including the CORAL (Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions) trial, the largest on the subject, as well as a meta-analysis of these studies, have indicated that the best approach is medical therapy alone. There is evidence that revascularization brings no additional benefit, at least in low-risk and stable atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. High-risk patients, especially those with recurrent flash pulmonary edema, could benefit from percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty and stent placement, but there is no definitive evidence and the treatment choice should take into account the risks and potential benefits of the procedure.

Intra-renal delivery of mesenchymal stem cells attenuates myocardial injury after reversal of hypertension in porcine renovascular disease

Introduction

Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) fails to fully improve cardiac injury and dysfunction in patients with renovascular hypertension (RVH). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) restore renal function, but their potential for attenuating cardiac injury after reversal of RVH has not been explored. We hypothesized that replenishment of MSCs during PTRA would improve cardiac function and oxygenation, and decrease myocardial injury in porcine RVH.

Methods

Pigs were studied after 16 weeks of RVH, RVH treated 4 weeks earlier with PTRA with or without adjunct intra-renal delivery of MSC (10^6 cells), and controls. Cardiac structure, function (fast-computed tomography (CT)), and myocardial oxygenation (Blood-Oxygen-Level-Dependent- magnetic resonance imaging) were assessed in-vivo. Myocardial microvascular density (micro-CT) and myocardial injury were evaluated ex-vivo. Kidney venous and systemic blood levels of inflammatory markers were measured and their renal release calculated.

Results

PTRA normalized blood pressure, yet stenotic-kidney glomerular filtration rate, similarly blunted in RVH and RVH + PTRA, normalized only in PTRA + MSC-treated pigs. PTRA attenuated left ventricular remodeling, whereas myocardial oxygenation, subendocardial microvascular density, and diastolic function remained decreased in RVH + PTRA, but normalized in RVH + PTRA-MSC. Circulating isoprostane levels and renal release of inflammatory cytokines increased in RVH and RVH + PTRA, but normalized in RVH + PTRA-MSC, as did myocardial oxidative stress, inflammation, collagen deposition, and fibrosis.

Conclusions

Intra-renal MSC delivery during PTRA preserved stenotic-kidney function, reduced systemic oxidative stress and inflammation, and thereby improved cardiac function, oxygenation, and myocardial injury four weeks after revascularization, suggesting a therapeutic potential for adjunctive MSC delivery to preserve cardiac function and structure after reversal of experimental RVH.

Renal artery stenosis-when to screen, what to stent?

Renal artery stensosis (RAS) continues to be a problem for clinicians, with no clear consensus on how to investigate and assess the clinical significance of stenotic lesions and manage the findings. RAS caused by fibromuscular dysplasia is probably commoner than previously appreciated, should be actively looked for in younger hypertensive patients and can be managed successfully with angioplasty. Atheromatous RAS is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular events and increased cardiovascular mortality, and is likely to be seen with increasing frequency. Evidence from large clinical trials has led clinicians away from recommending interventional revascularisation towards aggressive medical management. There is now interest in looking more closely at patient selection for intervention, with focus on intervening only in patients with the highest-risk presentations such as flash pulmonary oedema, rapidly declining renal function and severe resistant hypertension. The potential benefits in terms of improving hard cardiovascular outcomes may outweigh the risks of intervention in this group, and further research is needed.

Management of atherosclerotic renovascular disease after Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions (CORAL)

Many patients with occlusive atherosclerotic renovascular disease (ARVD) may be managed effectively with medical therapy for several years without endovascular stenting, as demonstrated by randomized, prospective trials including the Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions (CORAL) trial, the Angioplasty and Stenting for Renal Artery Lesions (ASTRAL) trial and the Stent Placement and Blood Pressure and Lipid-Lowering for the Prevention of Progression of Renal Dysfunction Caused by Atherosclerotic Ostial Stenosis of the Renal Artery (STAR) and ASTRAL. These trials share the limitation of excluding subsets of patients with high-risk clinical presentations, including episodic pulmonary edema and rapidly progressing renal failure and hypertension. Although hemodynamically significant, ARVD can reduce renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate; adaptive mechanisms preserve both cortical and medullary oxygenation over a wide range of vascular occlusion. Progression of ARVD to severe vascular compromise eventually produces cortical hypoxia, however, associated with active inflammatory cytokine release and cellular infiltration of the renal parenchyma. In such cases ARVD produces a loss of glomerular filtration rate that no longer is reversible simply by restoring vessel patency with technically successful renal revascularization. Each of these trials reported adverse renal functional outcomes ranging between 16 and 22% over periods of 2-5 years of follow-up. Blood pressure control and medication adjustment may become more difficult with declining renal function and may prevent the use of angiotensin receptor blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The objective of this review is to evaluate the current management of ARVD for clinical nephrologists in the context of recent randomized clinical trials and experimental research.

Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis is a common problem in the elderly. Despite two randomized trials that did not show a benefit of renal-artery stenting with respect to kidney function, the usefulness of stenting for the prevention of major adverse renal and cardiovascular events is uncertain.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 947 participants who had atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis and either systolic hypertension while taking two or more antihypertensive drugs or chronic kidney disease to medical therapy plus renal-artery stenting or medical therapy alone. Participants were followed for the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular and renal events (a composite end point of death from cardiovascular or renal causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, progressive renal insufficiency, or the need for renal-replacement therapy).

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up period of 43 months (interquartile range, 31 to 55), the rate of the primary composite end point did not differ significantly between participants who underwent stenting in addition to receiving medical therapy and those who received medical therapy alone (35.1% and 35.8%, respectively; hazard ratio with stenting, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.17; P=0.58). There were also no significant differences between the treatment groups in the rates of the individual components of the primary end point or in all-cause mortality. During follow-up, there was a consistent modest difference in systolic blood pressure favoring the stent group (-2.3 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4.4 to -0.2; P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal-artery stenting did not confer a significant benefit with respect to the prevention of clinical events when added to comprehensive, multifactorial medical therapy in people with atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis and hypertension or chronic kidney disease. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00081731.).

The rise and fall of renal artery angioplasty and stenting in the United States, 1988-2009

OBJECTIVE

Optimal management of renal artery stenosis (RAS) remains unclear. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown no clear benefit with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting (PTRA/S) over medical management. We hypothesize that interventions for RAS are decreasing nationally.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1988-2009, was used to identify patients with a diagnosis of renal artery atherosclerosis undergoing open surgical repair (bypass or endarterectomy) or PTRA/S. The rate of interventions, in-hospital death, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed over time. Additionally, we used individual state inpatient and ambulatory databases to better understand the influence of outpatient procedures on current volume and trends.

RESULTS

We identified 308,549 PTRA/S and 33,147 open surgical repairs. PTRA/S increased from 1.9/100K adults in 1988 to 13.7 in 2006 followed by a decrease to 6.7 in 2009. Open surgical repair steadily decreased from 1.3/100K adults in 1988 to 0.3 in 2009. In 2009, PTRA/S procedures (6.4/100K adults) greatly outnumbered procedures done by open repair alone (0.1/100K), combined open renal and aortic repair (0.2/100K), and combined PTRA/S and endovascular aneurysm repair (0.3/100K). From 2005 to 2009 33,953 patients underwent PTRA/S in the states of New Jersey Maryland, Florida, and California combined. The total number of PTRA/S performed in the outpatient setting remained stable from 2005 (3.8/100K) to 2009 (3.7/100K), whereas the total number of inpatient procedures mirrored the national trend, declining from 2006 (7.9/100K) to 2009 (4.2/100K). PTRA/S had lower in-hospital mortality (0.9% vs 4.1%; P < .001) compared with open repair. PTRA/S patients were more likely to be discharged home (86.2% vs 76.3%; P < .001) and had a shorter length of stay (4.4 vs 12.3 days; P < .001). Mortality was higher after combined open renal and open aortic surgery compared to open repair alone (6.5% vs 4.1%; P < .001). Mortality was similar for combined PTRA/S and endovascular aneurysm repair compared with PTRA/S alone (1.2% vs 0.9%; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of PTRA/S procedures for the management of RAS has decreased significantly after 2006. An increasing proportion of these procedures are performed in the outpatient setting. PTRA/S remains the dominant revascularization procedure for RAS with lower in-hospital mortality and morbidity than surgery.

Clinical effectiveness of secondary interventions for restenosis after renal artery stenting

OBJECTIVE

Secondary interventions for renal artery restenosis (RAS) after renal artery stenting are common, despite limited data about their effectiveness. This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular treatment of recurrent RAS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent renal artery stenting between 2001 and 2011 at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Patients who required secondary interventions were compared with control patients who underwent only primary interventions for RAS. Multivariate regression models were used to identify factors associated with successful outcomes, as measured by changes in blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and number of antihypertensive medications required.

RESULTS

Sixty-five secondary (57 patients) renal interventions were undertaken for recurrent RAS associated with progressive hypertension or renal dysfunction and compared with outcomes after 216 primary (180 patients) renal artery stenting procedures. Patients undergoing primary vs secondary interventions did not differ significantly in the number of preoperative antihypertensive medications used, comorbid conditions, or blood pressure. All primary and secondary interventions were performed with stents and showed no difference in procedural complications. At a mean follow-up of 23 months (range, 1-128 months), similar improvements in renal function and blood pressure were found between patients undergoing primary and secondary interventions, and there was no difference in rates of restenosis or survival between cohorts. Regression models showed that the use of embolic protection devices was associated with improved renal function after primary (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.8; P < .05) and secondary (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.7-12.5; P < .05) interventions, whereas statin therapy was associated with improved renal (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3.2; P < .05) and blood pressure response (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.1-14.9; P < .05) after secondary interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing secondary interventions for recurrent RAS have outcomes that are comparable with those for primary interventions. These data suggest that repeated endovascular procedures for RAS can be undertaken with similar expectations for clinical improvement and may be further improved by routine use of embolic protection devices and statin therapy.

Percutaneous revascularization for ischemic nephropathy: the past, present, and future

Occlusion of the renal arteries can threaten the viability of the kidney when severe, in addition to accelerating hypertension and circulatory congestion. Renal artery stenting procedures have evolved from a treatment mainly for renovascular hypertension to a maneuver capable of recovering threatened renal function in patients with “ischemic nephropathy” and improving management of congestive heart failure. Improved catheter design and techniques have reduced, but not eliminated hazards associated with renovascular stenting. Expanded use of endovascular stent grafts to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms has introduced a new indication for renal artery stenting to protect the renal circulation when grafts cross the origins of the renal arteries. Although controversial, prospective randomized trials to evaluate the added benefit of revascularization to current medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis until now have failed to identify major benefits regarding either renal function or blood pressure control. These studies have been limited by selection bias and have been harshly criticized. While studies of tissue oxygenation using blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) MR establish that kidneys can adapt to reduced blood flow to some degree, more severe occlusive disease leads to cortical hypoxia associated with microvascular rarefication, inflammatory injury and fibrosis. Current research is directed toward identifying pathways of irreversible kidney injury due to vascular occlusion and to increase the potential for renal repair after restoring renal artery patency. The role of nephrologists likely will focus upon recognizing the limits of renal adaptation to vascular disease and identifying kidneys truly at risk for ischemic injury at a time point when renal revascularization can still be of benefit to recovering kidney function.

Renal artery stenosis: prevalence of, risk factors for, and management of in-stent stenosis

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is common and is associated with hypertension and chronic kidney disease. More frequent use of percutaneous renal artery stent placement for the treatment of renal artery stenosis during the past 2 decades has increased the number of patients with implanted stents. In-stent stenosis is a serious problem, occurring more frequently than earlier reports suggest and potentially resulting in late complications. Currently, there are no guidelines covering the approach to restenosis after renal artery stent placement. This article reviews data on the prevalence of and risk factors for the development of in-stent stenosis and the clinical manifestations, evaluation, and treatment of in-stent stenosis and suggests a strategy for the management of patients after percutaneous renal artery stent placement.

Early duplex predicts restenosis after renal artery angioplasty and stenting

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between early renal duplex sonography (RDS) and restenosis after primary renal artery percutaneous angioplasty and stenting (RA-PTAS).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing RA-PTAS for hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis with hypertension and/or ischemic nephropathy between September 2003 and July 2010 were identified from a prospective registry. Patients had renal RDS pre-RA-PTAS, within 1 week of RA-PTAS and follow-up RDS examinations after the first postoperative week for surveillance of restenosis. Restenosis was defined as a renal artery peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥ 180 cm/s on follow-up RDS. Associations between RDS and restenosis were examined using proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients (59% female; 12% nonwhite; mean age, 70 ± 10 years; mean pre-RA-PTAS PSV, 276 ± 107 cm/s) undergoing 91 RA-PTAS procedures comprised the sample for this study. All procedures included a completion arteriogram demonstrating no significant residual stenosis. Mean follow-up time was 14.9 ± 10.8 months. Thirty-four renal arteries (RAs) demonstrated restenosis on follow-up with a median time to restenosis of 8.7 months. There was no significant difference in the mean PSV pre-RA-PTAS in those with and without restenosis (287 ± 96 cm/s vs 269 ± 113 cm/s; P = .455), and PSV pre-RA-PTAS was not predictive of restenosis. Within 1 week of RA-PTAS, mean renal artery PSV differed significantly for renal arteries with and without restenosis (112 ± 27 cm/s vs 91 ± 34 cm/s; P = .003). Proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated increased PSV on first post-RA-PTAS RDS was significantly and independently associated with subsequent restenosis during follow-up (hazard ratio for 30 cm/s increase, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.49; P = .0003). There was no difference in pre- minus postprocedural PSV in those with and without restenosis on follow-up (175 ± 104 cm/s vs 179 ± 124 cm/s; P = .88), nor was this associated with time to restenosis. Best subsets model selection identified first postprocedural RDS as the only factor predictive of follow-up restenosis. A receiver-operating characteristic curve was examined to assess the first week PSV post-RA-PTAS most predictive of restenosis during follow-up. The ideal cut point for RA-PSV was 87 cm/s or greater. This value was associated with a sensitivity of 82.4%, specificity of 52.6%, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 69.3%. Increased first postprocedural RA-PSV was predictive of lower estimated glomerular filtration rate in the first 2 years after the procedure (-1.6 ± 0.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2) lower estimated glomerular filtration rate per 10 cm/s increase in RA-PSV; P = .010).

CONCLUSIONS

Early renal artery PSV within 1 week after RA-PTAS predicted renal artery restenosis and lower postprocedure renal function. Recurrent stenosis demonstrated no association with absolute elevation in PSV prior to RA-PTAS nor with the change in PSV after RA-PTAS. These data suggest that detectable differences exist in renal artery flow parameters following RA-PTAS that are predictive of restenosis during follow-up but are not apparent on completion arteriography or detectable by intra-arterial pressure measurements. Further study is warranted.

Physician specialty and carotid stenting among elderly medicare beneficiaries in the United States

BACKGROUND

The use of carotid stenting is rising across the United States. How physician specialty relates to its utilization rates or outcomes is uncertain.

METHODS

We performed an observational analysis of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older undergoing carotid stenting between 2005 and 2007 in 306 hospital referral regions (HRRs). We first determined how frequently carotid stenting was performed by different specialists within each HRR and then used multivariable regression models to compare population-based utilization rates and 30-day outcomes for this procedure across HRRs based on the proportion performed by cardiologists, surgeons, radiologists, or a mix of specialists.

RESULTS

In 272 HRRs where at least 15 procedures were performed during the study period, we identified 28 700 carotid stenting procedures performed by 2588 operators. While cardiologists made up approximately one-third of these operators, they were responsible for 14 919 (52.0%) procedures. Significant differences were noted in the characteristics of patients treated by cardiologists compared with other specialties, including higher rates of invasive cardiac procedures and lower rates of acute stroke or transient ischemic attacks in the 180 days prior to carotid stenting. Population-based utilization rates were significantly higher in HRRs where cardiologists performed most procedures relative to HRRs where most were done by other specialists or a mix of specialists (P < .001). In contrast, risk-standardized outcomes did not differ across HRRs based on physician specialty.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid stenting is being performed by operators from diverse specialties. Hospital referral regions where cardiologists perform most procedures have higher population-based utilization rates with similar outcomes.

Arterial interventions for renovascular hypertension

Renovascular hypertension is a major cause of secondary hypertension. It affects relatively younger patients. The unifying pathology is renal artery stenosis. The most common cause is atherosclerosis accounting for about 90% of cases with fibromuscular dysplasia being the second most common cause. Both of these are amenable to percutaneous interventional therapy. With the advent of new medical therapies, the control of blood pressure has improved significantly. In well-selected patients, renal arterial intervention has a good outcome. The intervention includes renal angioplasty and stenting. In this article, the authors review the role of percutaneous intervention and the techniques involved with renal angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of renovascular hypertension.

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: review of pathophysiology, clinical trial evidence, and management strategies

Renal artery stenosis is prevalent and commonly encountered by cardiovascular specialists. Recently published randomized studies have provoked tremendous controversies in the treatment strategy with regard to renal artery stenting. However, these studies are inconclusive because of major study limitations. As such, cardiovascular specialists are uncertain of the indications or utility of renal revascularization, with differing opinions on management by nephrologists and cardiologists. A greater understanding of this disease process, especially with regard to its functional significance and consequence and treatment strategies based on well-designed clinical trials, is sorely needed. Our review focuses on atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, with an emphasis on indications for revascularization and review of current trial data.

Dramatic improvement of rapidly progressing acute renal failure and severe hypertension after bilateral renal artery stenting

In this case report, we describe an 83-year-old man with bilateral renal artery stenosis who had rapidly progressing acute renal failure and severe hypertension. These conditions improved dramatically after bilateral renal artery stenting. Renal artery stenosis can cause renal failure, hypertension, and heart failure, leading to a poorer life prognosis. If renal artery stenosis is found as a cause of acute renal failure, severe hypertension, or heart failure, it is useful to perform revascularization as soon as possible. Revascularization by stenting has a high success rate and is expected to improve the condition remarkably.

Statins and renovascular disease in the elderly: a population-based cohort study

AIMS

More than 90% of cases of renovascular disease (RVD) are caused by atherosclerosis; thus patients with this condition are at high risk for vascular events. We examined the association of statins with prognosis in patients with RVD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a population-based cohort study in 4040 patients with RVD older than 65 years using province-wide health data in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was time to first cardiorenal event, specifically myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, acute renal failure, dialysis or death; the primary analysis used a time-dependent covariate for statin exposure. Despite having a greater burden of cardiovascular and renal comorbidity, the risk of the primary outcome was significantly lower in statin users than in non-users [unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.57; P < 0.0001]. This association was materially unchanged after adjusting for demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, other comorbidities, measures of health-care utilization, screening, and concomitant medications (adjusted HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.46-0.57). An analysis using the same endpoint in a propensity-matched cohort without time-dependent statin exposure revealed a lower risk of the primary outcome in statin-treated patients but with a substantially more conservative point estimate (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that statins are associated with improved prognosis in elderly patients with RVD.

The uncertain value of renal artery interventions: where are we now?

Improved technology for detection of and endovascular procedures for renal artery stenosis due to atherosclerosis has been associated with increases in renal artery intervention. Hypertension with accelerated target organ injury, reduced kidney function, and episodic circulatory congestion in patients with renovascular disease predict reduced patient survival. Recent studies indicate that activation of pressor mechanisms depends upon hemodynamic gradients that are often overrated by visual estimates. Although activation of the renin-angiotensin system initiates renovascular hypertension, additional mechanisms perpetuate vascular remodeling and kidney injury that may not depend upon large vessel occlusion. Major advances in medical therapy have led to initiation of at least 4 major prospective trials comparing optimal medical therapy with or without stenting. Up to now, outcome data fail to support broad application of renal revascularization, including results from a recent large, prospective trial from the United Kingdom, despite small groups of patients that experience major clinical benefit. The ambiguity of these results partly reflect poor characterization of the severity of vascular lesions and competing risks within the population related to aging and pre-existing disease. Many patients currently undergoing renal artery interventions derive little net benefit and some are exposed to significant complications, including atheroembolic disease. Determining the appropriate role for renal artery interventions will depend on developing better methods for judging the role of large vessel occlusive disease regarding tissue oxygenation, activation of profibrotic pathways, and irreversible injury in the post-stenotic kidney.

Revascularization versus medical therapy for renal-artery stenosis. The ASTRAL Investigators. The New England Journal of Medicine 2009; 361: 1953—1962

Study objective: The objective of ASTRAL was to determine whether percutaneous revascularization combined with medical therapy compared to medical therapy alone improves renal function and other outcomes, such as blood pressure, time to first renal event, time to first major cardiovascular event, and mortality.

Study population: ASTRAL enrolled 806 patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease from 57 centers. Patients were screened if treating clinicians felt they had clinical features suggestive of underlying atherosclerotic renovascular disease (i.e. hypertension refractory to medical therapy, or renal impairment as suggested by laboratory measurements). All patients had to have an imaging modality (i.e. computed tomographic angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or renal artery ultrasound). This imaging had to convey that the patient had ‘substantial’ anatomical atherosclerotic stenosis in at least one renal artery that was suitable for endovascular therapy. Also, the treating clinician had to be ‘uncertain’ that the patient would benefit from revascularization. Fifty-nine percent of patients were reported to have renal artery stenosis of > 70%, and 60% had a serum creatinine of ≥ 150 mmol per liter.

Design and methods: ASTRAL was a randomized, unblinded study of patients with atherosclerotic renal artery disease who were assigned to percutaneous revascularization plus best medical therapy or best medical therapy alone. The primary outcome of the ASTRAL trial was the change of renal function over time, as determined by the mean slope of the reciprocal of serum creatinine. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure, time to first renal event (defined as: new onset of kidney injury, dialysis, renal transplantation, nephrectomy, or death from renal failure), time to first major cardiovascular event (defined as: myocardial infarction, stroke, death from cardiovascular cause, hospitalization for angina, fluid overload or congestive heart failure, coronary artery revascularization, or another peripheral arterial procedure), and all-cause mortality. Randomization was 1:1 via computer algorithm and was stratified by serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), severity of renal artery stenosis, kidney length on ultrasound, and rate of progression of renal impairment. Patients who were assigned to the revascularization plus medical therapy arm underwent percutaneous revascularization within 4 weeks. The procedure type (angioplasty alone or with stenting), was left to the discretion of the local operator. Distal protection devices were not used. Medical therapy in both arms consisted of antihypertensive drugs, statins, and antiplatelet agents. The trial was powered to detect a 20% reduction in the mean slope of the reciprocal of serum creatinine. Based on low crossover rates, it was determined that at least 750 patients would have to be enrolled. Analysis was by intention to treat. Continuous variables were subject to repeated measures analysis. Time-to-event data were expressed via Kaplan Meier curves and compared via log-rank testing. Prespecified subgroup analyses included baseline serum creatinine, GFR, severity of renal artery stenosis, kidney length, and progression of renal disease.

Results: Of the 806 patients included, 403 were randomized to the revascularization arm and 403 to medical therapy only. The median follow-up was 34 months. Only 337 (83%) patients randomized to revascularization underwent the procedure, whereas 24 patients (6%) randomized to the medical therapy arm underwent revascularization. The number of antihypertensive medications used was greater in the medical therapy group than in the revascularization group at the 12-month follow-up: 2.97 versus 2.77 ( p = 0.03). The mean slope of the reciprocal of the serum creatinine concentration was —0.07 × 10— 3 liters per micromole per year in the revascularization group versus —0.13 × 10—3 liters per micromole per year in the medical-therapy group (difference of 0.06 × 10 —3 liters per micromole per year) (95% confidence interval [CI], —0.002 to 0.13, p = 0.06) with a trend favoring revascularization. After 5 years of follow-up, there was a trend toward lower mean systolic blood pressure (1.6 mmHg lower, p = 0.06) in the revascularization group. However, the mean diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the medical therapy group at long-term follow-up (divergence of slope of mean diastolic blood pressure: 0.61 mmHg per year, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference between renal events, time to first renal event, acute kidney injury, or development of end-stage renal disease in either group. Further, there was no difference in major cardiovascular events or overall survival in either group. The periprocedural complication rate within the revascularization group was 9% (31/359 patients). Fifty-five out of 280 patients (20%) had an adverse event by 1 month post procedure. Overall, there were 31 serious complications of revascularization in 23 patients. Per protocol analysis of patients suggested that there was no significant difference in outcomes between patients who received revascularization versus medical therapy. No differences between treatment groups were identified in any of the pre-specified subgroup analyses.

Conclusions: Renal artery stenting combined with medical therapy did not improve renal function compared to medical therapy alone in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery disease.