1
|
Uppot RN, Wah TM, Mueller PR. Percutaneous treatment of renal tumours. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:853-861. [PMID: 37417722 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Image-guided ablation is an accepted treatment option in the management of renal cell carcinoma. Percutaneous renal ablation offers the possibility of minimally invasive treatment while attempting to preserve renal function. Over the past several years there have been advances in tools and techniques that have improved procedure safety and patient outcomes. This article provides an updated comprehensive review of percutaneous ablation in the management of renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raul N Uppot
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tze Min Wah
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter R Mueller
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haroon M, Sathiadoss P, Hibbert RM, Jeyaraj SK, Lim C, Schieda N. Imaging considerations for thermal and radiotherapy ablation of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:5386-5407. [PMID: 34245341 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03178-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Ablative (percutaneous and stereotactic) thermal and radiotherapy procedures for management of both primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma are increasing in popularity in clinical practice. Data suggest comparable efficacy with lower cost and morbidity compared to nephrectomy. Ablative therapies may be used alone or in conjunction with surgery or chemotherapy for treatment of primary tumor and metastatic disease. Imaging plays a crucial role in pre-treatment selection and planning of ablation, intra-procedural guidance, evaluation for complications, short- and long-term post-procedural surveillance of disease, and treatment response. Treatment response and disease recurrence may differ considerably after ablation, particularly for stereotactic radiotherapy, when compared to conventional surgical and chemotherapies. This article reviews the current and emerging role of imaging for ablative therapy of renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cai Y, Li F, Li Z, Li X, Li C, Xia Z, Du L, Wu R. Predictive value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with conventional ultrasound in solid renal parenchymal lesions. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210518. [PMID: 34319793 PMCID: PMC9327773 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop a model to predict the risk of malignancy in solid renal parenchymal lesions based on the imaging features of combined conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). METHODS A retrospective review was performed among patients with focal solid renal parenchymal lesions on ultrasound images. Ultrasound features were characterized by two experienced radiologists independently. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the most relevant features and to estimate the risk of malignancy. Scoring and counting methods were developed based on the most relevant features. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS A total of 519 renal lesions were included in this study. The conventional ultrasound features of diameter, echogenicity, hypoechoic rim and the CEUS feature of heterogeneity were identified as the most relevant features for prediction of malignancy. The sensitivity and specificity for the logistic regression model, the scoring method and the counting method were 95.3 and 93.4%, 93.8 and 87.8%, 88.8 and 93.9%, respectively. The logistic model had the best performance for diagnosing malignant renal lesions with AUC of 0.978, compared with the scoring method and the counting method with AUCs of 0.958 and 0.965. CONCLUSION The combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound with conventional ultrasound improved the diagnostic performance of solid renal lesions based on the logistic regression model. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE In this study, we revealed that the combination of CEUS and conventional ultrasound provided higher accuracy for diagnosing malignant renal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyu Cai
- Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fan Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaojun Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunxiao Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen Xia
- Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Lianfang Du
- Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Wu
- Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Percutaneous CT-Guided Renal Cryoablation: Technical Aspects, Safety, and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in a Single Center. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57030291. [PMID: 33804740 PMCID: PMC8003936 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57030291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Cryoablation is emerging as a safe and effective therapeutic option for treating renal cell carcinoma. This study analyzed the safety and long-term oncological outcomes of cryoablation in our center. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous cryoablation between February 2011 and June 2020 for one or more clinically localized renal tumors were identified. Technical success and treatment efficacy were assessed. Post-procedural complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Recurrence-free survival was determined for biopsy-proven malignant renal tumors. Results: A total of 174 renal tumors, 78 of which were biopsy-proven malignant carcinomas, were treated in 138 patients (97 males and 41 females, mean age: 73 years, range: 43-89 years). Mean tumor size was 2.25 cm and 54.6% of the lesions required a complex approach. Technical success was achieved in 171 out of 174 tumors (98.3%). Primary treatment efficacy was 95.3% and increased to 98.2% when retreats were taken into account. The overall complication rate was 29.8%. No complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III or more were encountered. Median follow-up was 21.92 months (range: 0.02-99.87). Recurrence-free survival was 100% at 1 year, 95.3% (95% CI: 82.1%-98.8%) at 3 years, and 88.6% (95% CI: 71.8%-95.7%) at 5 years. Conclusions: Cryoablation is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of small renal lesions, with no major complications when performed by expert interventional radiologists. The multidisciplinary discussion is essential, especially considering the high number of histologically undetermined lesions. Our long-term oncological outcomes are encouraging and in line with the literature.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ozambela M, Wang Y, Leow JJ, Silverman SG, Chung BI, Chang SL. Contemporary trends in percutaneous renal mass biopsy utilization in the United States. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:835-843. [PMID: 32912815 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with a renal mass traditionally proceed directly to surgery without a preoperative tissue diagnosis confirming malignancy. Many surgically treated renal masses represent benign tumors or indolent malignancies on final pathology. This has led to a growing body of literature supporting an expanded role for percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB). This study aims to characterize national trends in RMB utilization. METHODS Patients undergoing renal biopsy during a 12-year period (2006-2017) in the Premier Hospital Database were captured using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision codes. We restricted our analysis to patients with a concurrent diagnosis of a renal mass. We determined utilization rate, subsequent interventions within 90 days of biopsy, predictors of RMB, and 30-day RMB complication rates. We applied sampling weights and adjusted for hospital clustering to achieve a nationally representative analysis. RESULTS Among 115,511 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the annual number of RMB rose from 7,196 in 2006 to 11,528 in 2017; during this period, more than 3 times as many patients proceeded directly to surgery without a prior RMB. After RMB, 85,848 (74.32%) patients were not treated within 90 days. Of those treated, thermal ablation was more common than surgery (17,269 vs. 12,394). Trend analysis showed that patients with metastatic disease represented a decreasing proportion of patients receiving RMB (27.0%-21.8%; P < 0.001). Compared to patients who proceeded directly to surgery, RMB was more commonly performed in patients in the highest age group (80 years and older, 15.9% vs. 9.2%), unmarried (50% vs. 45.9%), with more medical comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index ≥4, 30.9% vs. 17.4%), or with metastatic disease (24.5% vs. 10.4%). Multivariable regression analysis determined the primary predictor of RMB was the presence of metastatic disease. Hematuria was the most common complication present in 5.18% of patients followed by pneumothorax in 1.75%. All other complications were rare (<0.4%). CONCLUSION Although there has been progressive adoption of RMB for the management of renal masses in the United States, utilization remains relatively limited and differentially employed across the population based on both clinical and nonclinical patient factors. More research is needed to understand which factors are considered when determining whether to utilize RMB in the evaluation of a renal mass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Ozambela
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ye Wang
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Stuart G Silverman
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Benjamin I Chung
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gupta A, Musaddaq B, von Stempel C, Ilyas S. Percutaneous Renal Ablation. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2020; 41:351-356. [PMID: 32620225 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Incidental small renal cell cancers are increasingly being diagnosed on cross-sectional imaging. This review article describes the indications for percutaneous ablation of small renal cell cancers, choice of ablation technologies and imaging follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Besma Musaddaq
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Conrad von Stempel
- Department of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shahzad Ilyas
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nguyen D, vanSonnenberg E, Kang P, Mueller PR. Urologic and interventional radiology treatment of renal cell carcinomas-similarities and differences. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:S113. [PMID: 31576320 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.05.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diep Nguyen
- Department of Student Affairs, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Eric vanSonnenberg
- Department of Student Affairs, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.,Departments of Radiology & Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul Kang
- Department of Student Affairs, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Peter R Mueller
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Update on Indications for Percutaneous Renal Mass Biopsy in the Era of Advanced CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 212:1187-1196. [PMID: 30917018 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.21093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this article is to review the burgeoning role of percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB). CONCLUSION. Percutaneous RMB is safe, accurate, and indicated for an expanded list of clinical scenarios. The chief scenarios among them are to prevent treatment of benign masses and help select patients for active surveillance (AS). Imaging characterization of renal masses has improved; however, management decisions often depend on a histologic diagnosis and an assessment of biologic behavior of renal cancers, both of which are currently best achieved with RMB.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lau HD, Kong CS, Kao CS. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and a practical algorithmic approach for the diagnosis of renal masses by FNA. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126:782-796. [PMID: 30193011 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The classification of renal neoplasms is essential for oncologic risk stratification and clinical management, and an accurate pretreatment pathologic diagnosis can provide useful guidance for active surveillance, minimally invasive ablative therapy, or surgical resection and can reduce the incidence of overtreatment. Previous studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) for renal masses are limited and show variable results. METHODS Two hundred forty-seven renal FNA cases with or without concurrent CNB performed and/or reviewed at the Stanford University School of Medicine over the course of 20 years were identified. Cytohistopathologic correlation was performed for 77 cases with subsequent resection specimens. All available case materials were reviewed, and select cases were worked up further and reclassified as necessary. RESULTS Cytohistopathologic correlation showed 96% diagnostic specificity and 83% sensitivity for renal FNA with or without concurrent CNB. Discordant cases were mostly attributed to sampling errors or suboptimal specimens (79%) and also included 2 non-renal cell carcinoma entities (1 case of angiomyolipoma and 1 case of a benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor) and 1 case involving misclassification of the renal cell carcinoma subtype. CONCLUSIONS There is considerable value in FNA/CNB for the initial diagnosis of renal masses because of the high diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. Sensitivity is predominantly dependent on sufficient sampling, and additional potential diagnostic pitfalls include nonepithelial and rare entities. Judicious use of ancillary techniques is encouraged, especially when one is presented with a limited specimen, and this article presents a practical algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of renal masses using salient morphologic features and results from ancillary studies. Fine-needle aspiration is an accurate method for the diagnosis of renal masses. A practical diagnostic algorithm, based on salient morphologic and ancillary findings, is presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hubert D Lau
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Christina S Kong
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Chia-Sui Kao
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tsang Mui Chung MS, Maxwell AW, Wang LJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE. Should Renal Mass Biopsy Be Performed prior to or Concomitantly with Thermal Ablation? J Vasc Interv Radiol 2018; 29:1240-1244. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
11
|
Abstract
Image-guided renal biopsies have an increasing role in clinical practice. Renal mass and renal parenchymal biopsy indications, techniques, and other clinical considerations are reviewed in this article. Image-guided renal mass ablation shows significant promise and increasing clinical usefulness as more studies demonstrate its safety and efficacy. Renal mass ablation indications, techniques, and other considerations are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharath K Bhagavatula
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Paul B Shyn
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ierardi AM, Petrillo M, Patella F, Biondetti P, Fumarola EM, Angileri SA, Pesapane F, Pinto A, Dionigi G, Carrafiello G. Interventional radiology of the adrenal glands: current status. Gland Surg 2018; 7:147-165. [PMID: 29770310 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2018.01.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
As more and more adrenal neoplasms are found incidentally or symptomatically, the need for interventional procedures has being increasing. In recent years these procedures registered continued steady expansion. Interventional radiology of the adrenal glands comprises angiographic and percutaneous procedures. They may be applied both in benign and in malignant pathologies. The present review reports the current status of indications, techniques results and complications of the image-guided procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Maria Ierardi
- Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Petrillo
- Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Patella
- Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Biondetti
- Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Maria Fumarola
- Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Pesapane
- Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Pinto
- Department of Radiology, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianlorenzo Dionigi
- Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood "G. Barresi", University Hospital, Policlinico "G. Martino", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Diagnostic and Intervention Radiology Department, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
[Ablative therapy in urology: Good practice and perspective]. Prog Urol 2017; 27:994-1014. [PMID: 28958771 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2017.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Revised: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To expose the main point of discussion from present ablative therapies' guidelines and propose global perspectives. MATERIALS AND METHODS A review of the scientific literature was performed in Medline database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com/) using different associations of keywords "ablative therapy" ; "prostate cancer"; "kidney cancer"; "guidelines"; "hybrid operating room". Publications obtained were selected based on methodology, language and relevance. RESULTS Present guidelines on ablative therapies in urology are, considering authors and organs, either particularly prudent (EAU guidelines for prostate and kidney) or relatively optimistic (CIRSE guidelines). This discrepancy is related to a low level of proof. So, a new approach is mandatory: more homogeneous in methodology, and especially more open to a new organization sparing economic efficiency. The objective will be to get multifunctional and multidisciplinaries platforms, in facts and in minds. It will induce, in the future, a deep reflection about training and boundaries' specialties. CONCLUSION Ablative therapies represent a crucial stake for urology and a clear example of medicosurgical evolution in future, based on new technologies (energy, robotic, imaging). A serious and deep reflection is necessary to prepare it and be deeply involved in.
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Iguchi T, Hiraki T, Gobara H, Fujiwara H, Sakurai J, Matsui Y, Araki M, Nasu Y, Kanazawa S. Value of percutaneous needle biopsy of small renal tumors in patients referred for cryoablation. MINIM INVASIV THER 2016; 26:86-91. [PMID: 27750475 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1249889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively evaluate the safety and diagnostic yield of needle biopsy of small renal tumors, and the clinical consequences of performing needle biopsy in patients referred for percutaneous cryoablation before their treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS Biopsy was performed for 120 tumors (mean diameter, 2.2 cm) in 119 patients. All procedures were divided into diagnostic and non-diagnostic biopsies. Various variables were compared between the two groups. All cryoablation procedures were divided into two groups: procedures with or without simultaneous biopsy. The rates of benign or non-diagnostic tumors in each group were compared. RESULTS After performing 120 initial and eight repeat biopsies, Grade 1 bleedings occurred in 44 cases. Six tumors were non-diagnostic and 114 were pathologically diagnosed. There were no significant variables between the diagnostic and non-diagnostic biopsies. Unnecessary cryoablation was avoided in nine benign lesions by performing biopsy in advance. Cryoablation performed simultaneously with biopsy included significantly more benign or non-diagnostic tumors than cryoablation performed after biopsy (15.2% vs. 1.4%; p = .01). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous biopsy of small renal tumors referred for cryoablation was a safe procedure with high diagnostic yield. The confirmation of pathological diagnosis prior to cryoablation is necessary because patients with benign tumors can avoid unnecessary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiro Iguchi
- a Department of Radiology , Okayama University Medical School , Okayama , Japan
| | - Takao Hiraki
- a Department of Radiology , Okayama University Medical School , Okayama , Japan
| | - Hideo Gobara
- a Department of Radiology , Okayama University Medical School , Okayama , Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Fujiwara
- a Department of Radiology , Okayama University Medical School , Okayama , Japan
| | - Jun Sakurai
- a Department of Radiology , Okayama University Medical School , Okayama , Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsui
- a Department of Radiology , Okayama University Medical School , Okayama , Japan
| | - Motoo Araki
- b Department of Urology , Okayama University Medical School , Okayama , Japan
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- b Department of Urology , Okayama University Medical School , Okayama , Japan
| | - Susumu Kanazawa
- a Department of Radiology , Okayama University Medical School , Okayama , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma is the tenth most common malignancy in the USA, with upwards of 61,000 new cases and resulting in more than 14,000 deaths annually. Although partial nephrectomy remains the standard treatment, image-guided nephron-sparing ablative techniques including cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation have emerged as treatment options in certain patient populations. Ablative therapies have high technical successes, low tumor recurrence rates, and preserve renal parenchymal volume. The purpose of this article is to provide an update on ablation therapies for small renal masses.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sidhar K, McGahan JP, Early HM, Corwin M, Fananapazir G, Gerscovich EO. Renal Cell Carcinomas: Sonographic Appearance Depending on Size and Histologic Type. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2016; 35:311-320. [PMID: 26740493 DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.03051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prior studies have demonstrated that approximately 10% of malignant renal cell carcinomas are as echogenic as angiomyolipomas on sonography. However, a recent presentation suggested that small (<1-cm) echogenic renal masses are always angiomyolipomas or other benign entities. We therefore examined our own cases of renal cell carcinoma, with corresponding sonography, to confirm that some renal cell carcinomas may also be detected as hyperechoic masses on sonography. METHODS Institutional Review Board approval and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance were maintained for this retrospective review of 91 pathologically proven cases of renal cell carcinoma, with corresponding sonography. Tumors were first differentiated by histologic cell type (clear cell, papillary, and chromophobe). Tumors were then stratified according to 2 size group parameters, falling into those that were 3 cm or larger and those that were smaller than 3 cm in diameter, with the less than 3-cm group further subdivided into 2 cm or smaller and greater than 2 cm. Tumor echogenicity was graded on a 5-point scale with respect to the renal parenchyma. RESULTS Forty-six tumors (51%) were 3 cm in diameter or smaller, and most were found to be either isoechoic (35%) or mildly hyperechoic (26%) to the surrounding renal parenchyma. Of tumors smaller than 2 cm, most were either mildly hyperechoic (29%) or as hyperechoic as renal sinus fat (very hyperechoic; 29%). Tumors larger than 3 cm were found most often to be either isoechoic (49%) or mildly hyperechoic (33%), with only 4% found to be very hyperechoic. CONCLUSIONS The sonographic appearances of renal cell carcinomas include a small population that are very hyperechoic on sonography and thus could potentially be misdiagnosed as angiomyolipomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal Sidhar
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California USA
| | - John P McGahan
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California USA.
| | - Heather M Early
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California USA
| | - Michael Corwin
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California USA
| | - Ghaneh Fananapazir
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California USA
| | - Eugenio O Gerscovich
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis Health System, Sacramento, California USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Leão RRN, Richard PO, Jewett MAS. Indications for biopsy and the current status of focal therapy for renal tumours. Transl Androl Urol 2015; 4:283-93. [PMID: 26816831 PMCID: PMC4708239 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.06.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The increased detection of small renal masses (SRMs) has focused attention on their uncertain natural history. The development of treatment alternatives and the discovery of biologically targeted drugs have also raised interest. Renal mass biopsies (RMBs) have a crucial role as they provide the pathological, molecular and genetic information needed to classify these lesions and guide clinical management. The improved accuracy has improved our knowledge of the behaviour of different tumour histologies and opened the potential for risk-adapted individualized treatment approaches. To date, studies have demonstrated that percutaneous ablation is an effective therapy with acceptable outcomes and low risk in the appropriate clinical setting. Although partial nephrectomy (PN) is still considered the standard treatment for SRM, percutaneous ablation is increasingly being performed and if long-term efficacy is sustained, it may have a wider application for SRMs after biopsy characterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo R N Leão
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick O Richard
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael A S Jewett
- Department of Surgery (Urology) and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Growing indications for CEUS: The kidney, testis, lymph nodes, thyroid, prostate, and small bowel. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84:1675-84. [PMID: 26014102 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2015] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is increasingly used for non-hepatic applications as well, so that nearly all organs have been investigated. Among them, there is a growing clinical use for a variety of pathologies of the kidney, testis, and small bowel. The possibility to differentiate benign from malignant nodes in cancer patients has been investigated. A new application is in the detection of sentinel nodes after intradermal microbubble injection. The need to distinguish thyroid nodules eligible for fine needle aspiration cytology has led to the use of CEUS in thyroid examinations as well. The potential of CEUS for prostate cancer detection has been extensively investigated, with encouraging initial results. Early promise, however, has not been fulfilled. New perspective regards evaluation of the extent of prostate tissue devascularization following ablative treatments.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Image-guided ablation (IGA) techniques have evolved considerably over the past 20 years and are increasingly used to definitively treat small primary cancers of the liver and kidney. IGA is recommended by most guidelines as the best therapeutic choice for patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-defined as either a single tumour smaller than 5 cm or up to three nodules smaller than 3 cm-when surgical options are precluded, and has potential as first-line therapy, in lieu of surgery, for patients with very early stage tumours smaller than 2 cm. With regard to renal cell carcinoma, despite the absence of any randomized trial comparing the outcomes of IGA with those of standard partial nephrectomy, a growing amount of data demonstrate robust oncological outcomes for this minimally invasive approach and testify to its potential as a standard-of-care treatment. Herein, we review the various ablation techniques, the supporting evidence, and clinical application of IGA in the treatment of primary liver and kidney cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Breen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Riccardo Lencioni
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Division of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Pisa University Hospital and School of Medicine, Building No. 29, 2nd Floor, Via Paradisa 2, IT-56124 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
De Filippo M, Bozzetti F, Martora R, Zagaria R, Ferretti S, Macarini L, Brunese L, Rotondo A, Rossi C. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of renal tumors. Radiol Med 2014; 119:499-511. [PMID: 25024061 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-014-0412-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) of renal malignancies is currently a therapeutic option for patients who are not able to undergo surgery. Some authors consider PRFA as the therapeutic standard in the treatment of renal neoplasms in non-operable patients due to comorbid conditions and in patients with mild-moderate renal failure, to preserve residual renal functionality. The use of PRFA has become more and more widespread due to a rise in the incidental detection of renal cell carcinomas with the ever-increasing use of Imaging for the study of abdominal diseases. Clinical studies indicate that RF ablation is an effective therapy with a low level of risk of complications, which provides good results in selected patients over short and medium term periods of time, however up to now few long-term studies have been carried out which can confirm the effectiveness of PRFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo De Filippo
- Section of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gunn AJ, Gervais DA. Percutaneous ablation of the small renal mass-techniques and outcomes. Semin Intervent Radiol 2014; 31:33-41. [PMID: 24596438 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
An increasing number of T1a renal cell carcinomas are being diagnosed in recent years, in part due to incidental detection from the increased use of cross-sectional imaging. Although partial nephrectomy is still considered the primary treatment for these small renal masses, percutaneous ablation is now being performed as a standard therapeutic, nephron-sparing approach in patients who are poor surgical candidates. Clinical studies to date have demonstrated that percutaneous ablation is an effective therapy with acceptable outcomes and low risk in the appropriate clinical settings. This article will review various clinical aspects regarding the percutaneous ablation of small renal masses, including patient selection, preprocedural preparations, and the procedural considerations of commonly employed ablative technologies. Specific techniques such as radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound will be addressed in detail. In addition, the technical and oncologic outcomes of percutaneous ablation will be discussed and referenced to that of partial nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Gunn
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School
| | - Debra A Gervais
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Scan (CEUS) and MRI in the follow-up of cryoablation for small renal tumors. Experience on 25 cases. Urologia 2014; 81 Suppl 23:S1-8. [DOI: 10.5301/ru.2014.11986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Percutaneous ablation in the kidney is now performed as a standard therapeutic nephron-sparing option in patients who are poor candidates for resection. Its increasing use has been largely prompted by the rising incidental detection of renal cell carcinomas with cross-sectional imaging and the need to preserve renal function in patients with comorbid conditions, multiple renal cell carcinomas, and/or heritable renal cancer syndromes. To date, clinical studies indicate that cryoablation is an effective therapy with acceptable short- to intermediate-term outcomes and with a low risk in the appropriate setting. This article focuses on the efficiency of contrast enhanced ultrasound scan (CEUS) as compared to contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during the follow-up after cryoablation of small renal tumors. Material and Methods In our Department, percutaneous or laparoscopic assisted cryoablation is offered in the treatment of small renal masses. Between January 2009 and January 2013, 25 patients (pts) were treated with laparoscopic assisted cryoablation or percutaneous cryoablation for renal tumors <3.5 cm in pts unfit for surgery. All pts had severe comorbidities (ASA score 3). Transperitoneal laparoscopic approach was performed in 11 pts, extraperitoneal approach in 3 pts, percutaneous technique was performed in 11 patients. “Tru-cut biopsy” of the renal mass was always performed before cryoablation. The SeedNet system (Galil Medical, Arden Hills, MN) was used in 12/25 pts; the Precise system (Galil Medical, Arden Hills, MN) was used in 13/25 pts. In all cases, IceRod needles were used. Real-time ultrasound guidance was used to localize the tumour and to monitor the progression of “iceball”. A double “freeze-thaw cycle” was used. All pts had MRI and CEUS before cryoablation and the follow-up consisted in CEUS/MRI every 3 months during the first year and every 6 months thereafter. Results The mean age of the 25 pts was 67.7 years (range 56–79); 5 pts were females and 20 were males. The mean tumor size was 2.8 cm (range 1.5–3.5). No patient required conversion to open procedure. 19 tumors were located at the lower pole, 4 were interpolar and 2 tumors were located at the upper pole. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was 4 days (range 1–7). Two pts required a blood transfusion; there was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels. The biopsy showed RCC in all cases. In 24/25 patients both CEUS and MRI showed no enhancement. In 1/25 pts, during the follow-up, CEUS and MRI showed a well visible recurrence at the perfusion study. It was histologically confirmed. The final results of CEUS and MRI were concordant in all pts. Conclusions CEUS is effective during the follow-up of renal tumor cryoablation. It could be an alternative technique to standard CT and MRI, with some advantages: low cost, short time consuming procedure, no radiation exposure, reduced amount of contrast agent (1–2 mL) and rare adverse reactions.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kos Z, Williams PA, Belanger EC, Mai KT. Fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct tool in the diagnosis of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma in fine needle aspiration specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 2014; 42:1013-23. [DOI: 10.1002/dc.23154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2013] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zuzana Kos
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa; Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Phillip A. Williams
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa; Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Eric C. Belanger
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa; Ottawa Ontario Canada
| | - Kien T. Mai
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa; Ottawa Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ahrar K, Wallace MJ, Matin SF. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: minimally invasive therapy for renal tumors. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 6:1735-44. [PMID: 17181487 DOI: 10.1586/14737140.6.12.1735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Currently, up to 60% of renal tumors are detected incidentally by abdominal imaging. Most of these tumors are small and localized to the kidney. Owing to the shift to lower stage at diagnosis, radical nephrectomy has fallen out of favor and has been replaced by nephron-sparing surgery. Currently, partial nephrectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with small renal tumors. As the trend towards less invasive therapy continues, laparoscopic and percutaneous ablation techniques have gained popularity for the treatment of renal tumors in patients who are high-risk surgical candidates, or have a solitary kidney, limited renal function or multifocal disease. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is a safe, minimally invasive treatment option for those patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamran Ahrar
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Interventional Radiology, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 325, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Volpe A, Jewett MAS. Current role, techniques and outcomes of percutaneous biopsy of renal tumors. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 9:773-83. [DOI: 10.1586/era.09.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
27
|
Ethier MD, Beland MD, Mayo-Smith W. Image-Guided Ablation of Adrenal Tumors. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 16:262-8. [DOI: 10.1053/j.tvir.2013.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
28
|
|
29
|
Salem S, Ponsky LE, Abouassaly R, Cherullo EE, Isariyawongse JP, MacLennan GT, Nakamoto D, Haaga JR. Image-guided biopsy of small renal masses in the era of ablative therapies. Int J Urol 2012. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.12010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sepehr Salem
- Urologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Therapies Center; Urology Institute; University Hospitals Case Medical Center; Cleveland; Ohio; USA
| | - Lee E Ponsky
- Urologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Therapies Center; Urology Institute; University Hospitals Case Medical Center; Cleveland; Ohio; USA
| | - Robert Abouassaly
- Urologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Therapies Center; Urology Institute; University Hospitals Case Medical Center; Cleveland; Ohio; USA
| | - Edward E Cherullo
- Urologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Therapies Center; Urology Institute; University Hospitals Case Medical Center; Cleveland; Ohio; USA
| | - Justin P Isariyawongse
- Urologic Oncology and Minimally Invasive Therapies Center; Urology Institute; University Hospitals Case Medical Center; Cleveland; Ohio; USA
| | - Gregory T MacLennan
- Department of Pathology; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; Cleveland; Ohio; USA
| | - Dean Nakamoto
- Department of Radiology; University Hospitals Case Medical Center; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; Cleveland; Ohio; USA
| | - John R Haaga
- Department of Radiology; University Hospitals Case Medical Center; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; Cleveland; Ohio; USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lim A, O'Neil B, Heilbrun ME, Dechet C, Lowrance WT. The contemporary role of renal mass biopsy in the management of small renal tumors. Front Oncol 2012; 2:106. [PMID: 22973552 PMCID: PMC3437570 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2012.00106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2012] [Accepted: 08/13/2012] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The selective use of percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis in renal masses is a relatively uncommon approach when compared to the management of other solid neoplasms. With recent advancements in imaging techniques and their widespread use, the incidental discovery of asymptomatic, small renal masses (SRM) is on the rise and a substantial percentage of these SRM are benign. Recent advances in diagnostics have significantly improved accuracy rates of renal mass biopsy (RMB), making it a potentially powerful tool in the management of SRM. In this review, we will discuss the current management of SRM, problems with the traditional view of RMB, improvements in the diagnostic power of RMB, cost-effectiveness of RMB, and risks associated with RMB. RMB may offer important information enabling treating clinicians to better risk-stratify patients and ultimately provide a more personalized treatment approach for SRM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Lim
- MD/PhD Program, University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pietryga JA, Beland MD, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW. Placement of Marker Coils at Biopsy: Usefulness in the Localization of Poorly Visualized Renal Neoplasms for Subsequent CT-guided Radiofrequency Ablation. Radiology 2012; 263:555-61. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
32
|
Zhang C, Li X, Hao H, Yu W, He Z, Zhou L. The correlation between size of renal cell carcinoma and its histopathological characteristics: a single center study of 1867 renal cell carcinoma cases. BJU Int 2012; 110:E481-5. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11173.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
33
|
Murphy G, Jhaveri K. The expanding role of imaging in the management of renal cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2012; 11:1871-88. [PMID: 22117155 DOI: 10.1586/era.11.122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is evolving owing to the increasing detection of small renal masses, greater understanding of the metabolic pathways involved, new targeted medical treatments for metastatic RCC, and evolving surgical and minimally invasive image-guided treatment techniques. Consequently, the role of imaging and radiology has expanded, with new challenges encompassing all aspects of management, including diagnosis, predicting cell type, staging, preoperative vascular mapping, image-guided treatment and biopsy, detection of recurrence and the use of imaging as a biomarker to assess response to treatment. This article is a comprehensive review of RCC, outlining the etiology of the disease, RCC histological subtypes and their imaging characteristics, imaging modality techniques for evaluation of RCC, treatment strategies and the management of small renal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Murphy
- University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Energy Ablative Techniques in Renal Cell Carcinoma. KIDNEY CANCER 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21858-3_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
35
|
Krajewski KM, Giardino AA, Zukotynski K, Van den Abbeele AD, Pedrosa I. Imaging in renal cell carcinoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2011; 25:687-715. [PMID: 21763963 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2011.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Imaging plays a central role in the detection, diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Most renal masses are incidentally detected with modern, high-resolution imaging techniques and a variety of management options exist for the renal masses encountered today. This article discusses the role of multiple imaging modalities in the diagnosis of RCC and the imaging features of specific pathologic subtypes and staging techniques. Future directions in RCC imaging are presented, including dynamic contrast-enhanced and unenhanced techniques, as well as the development of novel tracers for positron emission tomography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M Krajewski
- Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Percutaneous ablation in the kidney is now performed as a standard therapeutic nephron-sparing option in patients who are poor candidates for resection. Its increasing use has been largely prompted by the rising incidental detection of renal cell carcinomas with cross-sectional imaging and the need to preserve renal function in patients with comorbid conditions, multiple renal cell carcinomas, and/or heritable renal cancer syndromes. Clinical studies to date indicate that radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation are effective therapies with acceptable short- to intermediate-term outcomes and with a low risk in the appropriate setting, with attention to pre-, peri-, and postprocedural detail. The results following percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma are reviewed in this article, including those of several larger scale studies of ablation of T1a tumors. Clinical and technical considerations unique to ablation in the kidney are presented, and potential complications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH Clinical Center, 10 Center Dr, Bldg 10, Room 1C369, MSC 1182, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Allen BC, Remer EM. Percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: patient selection, technique, and postprocedural imaging. Radiographics 2010; 30:887-900. [PMID: 20631358 DOI: 10.1148/rg.304095134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors requires a number of important steps for success and relies heavily on imaging for treatment planning, intraprocedural guidance and monitoring, detection of untreated tumor, and surveillance for disease progression. Imaging-guided percutaneous cryoablation has several advantages over laparoscopic cryoablation. In particular, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allow global evaluation of the ablation zone and an accurate depiction of the treatment margin. Ultrasonography allows real-time guidance of probe placement but cannot help depict ice ball formation as accurately as CT or MR imaging. Multiphasic CT or MR imaging should be performed at structured intervals following ablation. Treated tumors are expected to decrease in size over time, and lesion growth and internal or nodular enhancement are suspicious for tumor recurrence or progression. Complications include probe site pain, hematoma, incomplete ablation, and recurrent tumor. Current limitations of percutaneous cryoablation include the inability to control hemorrhage without intraarterial access and a lack of long-term follow-up data. Nevertheless, percutaneous cryoablation is an effective choice for minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatment of renal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C Allen
- Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Patard JJ, Baumert H, Corréas JM, Escudier B, Lang H, Long JA, Neuzillet Y, Paparel P, Poissonnier L, Rioux-Leclercq N, Soulié M. Recommandations en Onco-Urologie 2010 : Cancer du rein. Prog Urol 2010; 20 Suppl 4:S319-39. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(10)70048-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
39
|
Samplaski MK, Zhou M, Lane BR, Herts B, Campbell SC. Renal mass sampling: an enlightened perspective. Int J Urol 2010; 18:5-19. [PMID: 21039914 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02641.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Renal mass sampling (RMS) can be carried out by core biopsy or fine needle aspiration with each presenting potential advantages and limitations. The literature about RMS is confounded by a lack of standardized techniques, ambiguous terminology, imprecise definitions of accuracy, substantial rates of non-informative biopsies, and recurrent diagnostic challenges with respect to eosinophilic neoplasms. Despite these concerns, RMS has an expanding role in the evaluation and treatment of renal masses, in order to stratify biological aggressiveness and guide management that can range from surgery to active surveillance. Non-informative biopsies can be managed with surgical excision or repeat biopsy, with the latter showing encouraging results in recent studies. We propose a new classification in which all biopsies are categorized as non-informative versus informative, with the latter being subclassified as confirmed accurate, presumed accurate or confirmed inaccurate. This terminology will facilitate the comparison of results from various studies and stimulate progress. Incorporation of novel biomarkers and molecular fingerprinting into RMS protocols will likely allow for more rational management of patients with renal masses in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary K Samplaski
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Johnson NB, Johnson MM, Selig MK, Nielsen GP. Use of electron microscopy in core biopsy diagnosis of oncocytic renal tumors. Ultrastruct Pathol 2010; 34:189-94. [PMID: 20594037 DOI: 10.3109/01913121003725713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The distinction between oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, important clinically, may be challenging, especially as the tissue sample size decreases. Ancillary studies can be helpful, although subject to interpretation and sample variability. The aim of this study was to examine the value of electron microscopy in differentiating between oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma on formalin fixed paraffin embedded needle core biopsies. Twenty renal needle core biopsies were evaluated. Despite formalin fixation and paraffin embedding, the classic ultrastructural features of these neoplasms were retained, revealing 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity by initial work-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N B Johnson
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sharma KV, Venkatesan AM, Swerdlow D, DaSilva D, Beck A, Jain N, Wood BJ. Image-guided adrenal and renal biopsy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 13:100-9. [PMID: 20540919 DOI: 10.1053/j.tvir.2010.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Image-guided biopsy is a safe and well-established technique that is familiar to most interventional radiologists. Improvements in image guidance, biopsy tools, and biopsy techniques now routinely allow for safe biopsy of renal and adrenal lesions that traditionally were considered difficult to reach or technically challenging. Image-guided biopsy is used to establish the definitive tissue diagnosis in adrenal mass lesions that cannot be fully characterized with imaging or laboratory tests alone. It is also used to establish definitive diagnosis in some cases of renal parenchymal disease and has an expanding role in diagnosis and characterization of renal masses before treatment. Although basic principles and techniques for image-guided needle biopsy are similar regardless of organ, this paper highlights some technical considerations, indications, and complications that are unique to the adrenal gland and kidney because of their anatomic location and physiological features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karun V Sharma
- Center for Interventional Oncology, Interventional Radiology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pandharipande PV, Gervais DA, Hartman RI, Harisinghani MG, Feldman AS, Mueller PR, Gazelle GS. Renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small incidental renal tumors: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 2010; 256:836-46. [PMID: 20720070 PMCID: PMC2923731 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness, cost, and cost-effectiveness of using renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small incidentally detected renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS A decision-analytic Markov model was developed to estimate life expectancy and lifetime costs for patients with small (< or = 4-cm) renal tumors. Two strategies were compared: renal mass biopsy to triage patients to surgery or imaging surveillance and empiric nephron-sparing surgery. The model incorporated biopsy performance, the probability of track seeding with malignant cells, the prevalence and growth of benign and malignant tumors, treatment effectiveness and costs, and patient outcomes. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to identify strategy preference under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $75,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Effects of changes in key parameters on strategy preference were evaluated in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Under base-case assumptions, the biopsy strategy yielded a minimally greater quality-adjusted life expectancy (4 days) than did empiric surgery at a lower lifetime cost ($3466), dominating surgery from a cost-effectiveness perspective. Over the majority of parameter ranges tested in one-way sensitivity analysis, the biopsy strategy dominated surgery or was cost-effective relative to surgery based on a $75,000-per-QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. In two-way sensitivity analysis, surgery yielded greater life expectancy when the prevalence of malignancy and propensity for biopsy-negative cancers to metastasize were both higher than expected or when the sensitivity and specificity of biopsy were both lower than expected. CONCLUSION The use of biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small incidentally detected renal tumors is cost-effective and can prevent unnecessary surgery in many cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pari V Pandharipande
- Department of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Adrenal tumors comprise a broad spectrum of benign and malignant neoplasms and include functional adrenal adenomas, pheochromocytomas, primary adrenocortical carcinoma, and adrenal metastases. Percutaneous ablative approaches that have been described and used in the treatment of adrenal tumors include percutaneous radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, microwave ablation, and chemical ablation. Local tumor ablation in the adrenal gland presents unique challenges, secondary to the adrenal gland's unique anatomic and physiological features. The results of clinical series employing percutaneous ablative techniques in the treatment of adrenal tumors are reviewed in this article. Clinical and technical considerations unique to ablation in the adrenal gland are presented, including approaches commonly used in our practices, and risks and potential complications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Center for Interventional Oncology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Roh MH, Dal Cin P, Silverman SG, Cibas ES. The application of cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization to fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and subclassification of renal neoplasms. Cancer Cytopathol 2010; 118:137-45. [DOI: 10.1002/cncy.20077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
46
|
Ignee A, Straub B, Schuessler G, Dietrich CF. Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses. World J Radiol 2010; 2:15-31. [PMID: 21160736 PMCID: PMC2998906 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v2.i1.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2009] [Revised: 01/20/2010] [Accepted: 01/22/2010] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has gained clinical importance over the last years for the characterization of hepatic masses. Its role in extrahepatic indications has been investigated repeatedly but has been less comprehensively studied. Currently more than 50% of renal masses are incidentally diagnosed, mostly by B-mode ultrasound. The method of choice for characterization of renal lesions is contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT). In the case of cystic lesions CECT refers to the Bosniak classification for cystic lesions to assess the risk of malignant behavior. The majority of masses are renal cell carcinoma, but the exact proportion is controversial. Disadvantages of CECT are a significant risk for patients with impaired renal function, allergic reactions and hyperthyroidism due to iodinated contrast agents. Several studies concerning CEUS for the characterization of both solid and cystic renal lesions have been published, but prospective multicenter studies are missing, the presented data being mainly descriptive. The aim of the this manuscript is to review the current literature for CEUS in renal masses, to summarize the available data and focus on possible concepts for studies in the future.
Collapse
|
47
|
del Cura JL, Zabala R, Iriarte JI, Unda M. Treatment of renal tumors by percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation using a multitined electrode: effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol 2009; 57:459-65. [PMID: 19926208 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2009] [Accepted: 11/03/2009] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally aggressive, therapeutic alternative for renal tumors. It can be an alternative to nephrectomy in patients with previous nephrectomy, bilateral tumors, von Hippel-Lindau disease, or small renal carcinomas and in those with contraindications for surgery. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of the treatment of renal tumors by RFA in the short and medium term and to identify the possible complications and the factors that determine therapeutic success. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective review of patients with renal tumors treated with RFA between May 2005 and December 2008 was performed in a tertiary academic hospital. Patients were selected among those with previous nephrectomy, bilateral neoplasms, von Hippel-Lindau disease, surgical risk, comorbidity, advanced age, or patient's refusal to surgery. Tumors with evidence of extrarenal extension were excluded. Patients were followed up for 10-50 mo using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. INTERVENTION Ultrasound-guided RFA was performed on 65 tumors (range: 1.2-5.3 cm) of 58 patients using multitined electrodes. MEASUREMENTS Incomplete ablation rate, therapeutic success rate, and complications rate. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Therapeutic success was achieved in 59 of 65 tumors (91%): 53 in a single session, 5 in two sessions, and 1 in three sessions. A significant relationship was observed between size and growth pattern of the tumor and both therapeutic success and incomplete ablation rates. Therapeutic success in tumors >5 cm was 60%. Complications were detected in 10 patients (13%); 5% were considered major complications. Limitations include the lack of pathologic studies to confirm a complete ablation and the lack of a control group to compare with the results of those who underwent nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS RFA is safe and effective in renal tumors. Corticomedullary lesions and tumors >3 cm have greater possibility of incomplete ablation. In tumors >5 cm, RFA has a significant failure rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose L del Cura
- Radiology Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wong SL, Mangu PB, Choti MA, Crocenzi TS, Dodd GD, Dorfman GS, Eng C, Fong Y, Giusti AF, Lu D, Marsland TA, Michelson R, Poston GJ, Schrag D, Seidenfeld J, Benson AB. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 clinical evidence review on radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 28:493-508. [PMID: 19841322 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.23.4450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 292] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the evidence about the efficacy and utility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer (CRHM). METHODS The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened a panel to conduct and analyze a comprehensive systematic review of the RFA literature from Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library. RESULTS Because data were considered insufficient to form the basis of a practice guideline, ASCO has instead published a clinical evidence review. The evidence is from single-arm, retrospective, and prospective trials. No randomized controlled trials have been included. The following three clinical issues were considered by the panel: the efficacy of surgical hepatic resection versus RFA for resectable tumors; the utility of RFA for unresectable tumors; and RFA approaches (open, laparoscopic, or percutaneous). Evidence suggests that hepatic resection improves overall survival (OS), particularly for patients with resectable tumors without extrahepatic disease. Careful patient and tumor selection is discussed at length in the literature. RFA investigators report a wide variability in the 5-year survival rate (14% to 55%) and local tumor recurrence rate (3.6% to 60%). The reported mortality rate was low (0% to 2%), and the major complications rate was commonly reported to be between 6% and 9%. RFA is currently performed with all three approaches. CONCLUSION There is a compelling need for more research to determine the efficacy and utility of RFA to increase local recurrence-free, progression-free, and disease-free survival as well as OS for patients with CRHM. Clinical trials have established that hepatic resection can improve OS for patients with resectable CRHM.
Collapse
|
49
|
Clark TWI, Millward SF, Gervais DA, Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Kinney TB, Phillips DA, Sacks D, Cardella JF. Reporting standards for percutaneous thermal ablation of renal cell carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009; 20:S409-16. [PMID: 19560028 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2006] [Revised: 06/29/2006] [Accepted: 07/03/2006] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy W I Clark
- Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Percutaneous image-guided biopsy of renal masses is a safe and accurate procedure. Although once reserved for the diagnosis of unresectable renal cell carcinoma, metastases, lymphoma, and infection, today percutaneous image-guided biopsy has an expanded role. There is increasing awareness that a substantial proportion of small, solid renal masses are benign neoplasms. Although imaging can be used to diagnose most of them, some are incorrectly believed to represent renal cell carcinoma and unnecessary surgery may be performed. Based largely on advances in cytological techniques, percutaneous biopsy can be now be used to diagnose benign neoplasms and thus prevent them from being treated unnecessarily. Concurrent advances in percutaneous ablation have also promoted its use. As a result, there are 8 established indications for percutaneous biopsy, and reason to believe that the number of indications will expand further in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Anik Sahni
- Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|