Role of Ultrasound and CT in the Workup of Right Upper Quadrant Pain in Adults in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Review of More Than 2800 Cases

Imaging Evaluation of the Biliary Tree

Noninvasive visualization of the biliary tree is of paramount importance in any patient who may require a biliary surgical intervention. Most hospitals and imaging centers offer ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), cholescintigraphy (commonly known as hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan), and MRI whenever acute biliary pathology is suspected. PET combined with CT is sometimes utilized to evaluate biliary malignancy and metastatic disease. Unfortunately, these imaging modalities are often ordered incorrectly and have numerous limitations. This article discusses the strengths and weaknesses or each imaging modality and focuses on appropriateness of their utilization in clinical practice.

Gastrointestinal and Biliary Point-of-Care Ultrasound

Point-of-care ultrasound has been shown to have excellent diagnostic accuracy for a variety of gastrointestinal and biliary pathologies. This review explores the evidence and scanning techniques for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, intussusception, appendicitis, small bowel obstruction, diverticulitis, hernias, pneumoperitoneum, and biliary pathology.

Computed tomography versus ultrasound for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Some patients undergo both computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) sequentially as part of the same evaluation for acute cholecystitis (AC). Our goal was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic performance of US and CT in the diagnosis of AC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases were searched for relevant published studies through November 2023. The primary objective was to compare the head-to-head performance of US and CT using surgical intervention or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. For the secondary analysis, all individual US and CT studies were analyzed. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, and areas under the curve (AUCs) were determined along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The prevalence of imaging findings was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. In the primary analysis of head-to-head studies (n = 5), CT had a pooled sensitivity of 83.9% (95% CI, 78.4-88.2%) versus 79.0% (95% CI, 68.8-86.6%) of US (p = 0.44). The pooled specificity of CT was 94% (95% CI, 82.0-98.0%) versus 93.6% (95% CI, 79.4-98.2%) of US (p = 0.85). The concordance of positive or negative test between both modalities was 82.3% (95% CI, 72.1-89.4%). US and CT led to a positive change in management in only 4 to 8% of cases, respectively, when ordered sequentially after the other test.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of CT is comparable to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, with a high rate of concordance between the two modalities.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

A subsequent US after a positive or negative CT for suspected acute cholecystitis may be unnecessary in most cases.

KEY POINTS

When there is clinical suspicion of acute cholecystitis, patients will often undergo both CT and US. CT has similar sensitivity and specificity compared to US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The concordance rate between CT and US for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis is 82.3%.

Ultrasound of the gallbladder: not the same bag of tricks

Imaging evaluation of the gallbladder is a fundamental skill in the majority of radiology practice. Due to ease of accessibility, low cost, lack of ionizing radiation, and excellent spatial resolution, ultrasound is often the first imaging modality used to evaluate the gallbladder. In this invited article we review and update how ultrasound can evaluate common pathologies including gallbladder polyps, tumefactive sludge, adenomyomatosis, and acute cholecystitis. We also discuss the role of Doppler, microvascular flow imaging, and contrast enhanced ultrasound in the sonographic assessment of the gallbladder.

Radiology Imaging Adds Time and Diagnostic Uncertainty when Point of Care Ultrasound Demonstrates Cholecystitis

BACKGROUND

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is specific for acute cholecystitis (AC), but surgeons request radiology imaging (RI) prior to admitting patients with POCUS-diagnosed AC.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the test characteristics of POCUS for AC when performed and billed by credentialed emergency physicians (EPs), the accuracy rate of RI when performed after POCUS, and the time added when RI is requested after POCUS demonstrates AC.

METHODS

We performed a dual-site retrospective cohort study of admitted adult ED patients who had received biliary POCUS from November 1, 2020 to April 30, 2022. Patients with previously diagnosed AC, liver failure, ascites, hepatobiliary cancer, or cholecystectomy were excluded. Descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals for point estimates were calculated. Medians were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Test characteristics of POCUS for AC were calculated using inpatient intervention for AC as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Of 473 screened patients, 143 were included for analysis: 80 (56%) had AC according to our reference standard. POCUS was positive for AC in 46 patients: 44 true positives and two false positives, yielding a positive likelihood ratio of 17.3 (95%CI 4.4-69.0) for AC. The accuracy rate of RI after positive POCUS for AC was 39.0%. Median time from ED arrival to POCUS and ED arrival to RI were 115 (IQR 64, 207) and 313.5 (IQR 224, 541) minutes, respectively; p < 0.01.

CONCLUSION

RI after positive POCUS performed by credentialed EPs takes additional time and may increase diagnostic uncertainty.

A meta-analysis of the performance of ultrasound, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, CT and MRI in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the recently reported relative diagnostic accuracy of US, CT, MRI, and cholescintigraphy for diagnosing acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

2 radiologists independently performed systematic electronic searches for articles published between 2000 and 2021 and applied inclusion/exclusion criteria. 2 different radiologists extracted data from the articles and scored each with a methodological quality tool. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated with a bivariate linear mixed model. A second analysis made head-to-head comparisons (US vs. CT, US vs. cholescintigraphy). Factors were also analyzed for potential confounding effects on diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Of 6121 initial titles, 22 were included. The prevalence of cholecystitis varied widely across studies (9.4-98%). Pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates were 69% (confidence limit [CL] 62-76%) and 79% (CL 71-86%) for US, 91% (CL 86-94%) and 63% (CL 51-74%) for cholescintigraphy, 78% (CL 69-84%) and 81% (CL 71-88%) for CT, and 91% (CL 78-97%) and 93% (CL 70-99%) for MRI. Regarding head-to-head comparisons, the sensitivity of CT (87.6%, CL 70-96%) was significantly higher than US (66.8%, CL 43-84%), while specificities (81.7% with CL 54-95% for US, 91.9% with CL 67-99% for CT) were similar. The sensitivity of cholescintigraphy (87.4%, CL 76-94%) was significantly greater than US (61.6%, CL 44-77%), while the specificity of US (82%, CL 65-92%) was significantly higher than cholescintigraphy (68%, CL 47-84%).

CONCLUSION

Recent data suggests that CT may have a higher sensitivity than US for diagnosing acute cholecystitis, with similar specificity. Cholescintigraphy remains a highly sensitive modality with lower specificity than previously reported. MRI remains under studied, but with promising results.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An updated overview of ultrasound (US) for diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (AC) remains lacking. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of US for AC.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We meticulously screened articles from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, spanning from inception to August 2023. We employed the search strategy combining the keywords "bedside US", "emergency US" or "point-of-care US" with "AC". Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles to identify suitable studies. The inclusion criteria encompassed articles investigating the diagnostic performance of US for AC. Data regarding diagnostic performance, sonographers, and sonographic findings including the presence of gallstone, gallbladder (GB) wall thickness, peri-GB fluid, or sonographic Murphy sign were extracted, and a meta-analysis was executed. Case reports, editorials, and review articles were excluded, as well as studies focused on acalculous cholecystitis. The study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

RESULTS

Forty studies with 8,652 patients were included. The majority of studies had a low risk of bias and applicability concerns. US had a pooled sensitivity of 71% (95% CI, 69-72%), a specificity of 85% (95% CI, 84-86%), and an accuracy of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.82-0.83) for the diagnosis of AC. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 71% (95% CI, 67-74%) and 92% (95% CI, 90-93%) performed by emergency physicians (EPs), 79% (95% CI, 71-85%) and 76% (95% CI, 69-81%) performed by surgeons, and 68% (95% CI 66-71%) and 87% (95% CI, 86-88%) performed by radiologists, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

US is a good imaging modality for the diagnosis of AC. EP-performed US has a similar diagnostic performance to radiologist-performed US. Further investigations would be needed to investigate the impact of US on expediting the management process and improving patient-centered outcomes.

Accuracy of Ultrasound and Computed Tomography in Diagnosing Acute Cholecystitis Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia

Background Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a gallbladder inflammatory disease often associated with gallbladder stones. It accounts for up to 5% of emergency department visits. The majority of patients present with pain in the right upper quadrant, Murphy's sign, and fever. Furthermore, Saudi Arabia has been noted to have a significant prevalence of AC. According to the 2018 Tokyo Guidelines, imaging is an essential element, combined with local and systemic evidence of inflammation, for a confirmed diagnosis of AC. The definitive therapy is conducted surgically by cholecystectomy either urgently or electively. However, there are insufficient studies that focus on the accuracy of imaging in diagnosing AC patients in Saudi Arabia. Objective The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of ultrasound (US) versus computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing AC patients at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods and material A retrospective record review was conducted at KAUH during the period of June to July 2022. The study included 192 patients diagnosed with AC in the emergency department or outpatient department by US or CT or both and confirmed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy and histopathology between 2016 and 2022. Results The most common modality used was US (79.7%), followed by both US and contrast CT (10.9%). For CT, sensitivity was 81.3%, specificity was 62.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 59.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 83.3%. For US, sensitivity was 37.9%, specificity was 81.7%, PPV was 50%, and NPV was 73.1%. A significant relationship was observed between both genders and high use of US (P = 0.0001). Conclusion We found that CT is more sensitive than US, while US is more specific in diagnosing AC.

The use of additional imaging studies after biliary point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department

PURPOSE

We sought to determine the test characteristics of biliary point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and to assess the usefulness of obtaining radiology ultrasound (RUS) or cholescintigraphy (HIDA) after biliary POCUS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of emergency department patients who underwent biliary POCUS between May 4, 2018 and November 28, 2021. To be included, patients had to have at least one of the following confirmatory evaluations (considered in this order): surgery, HIDA, RUS, or abdominal CT scan. When a discrepancy existed between the POCUS and the RUS or HIDA, they were compared to a higher criterion standard (if available).

RESULTS

Using 348 patients who had a confirmatory evaluation after biliary POCUS, we found the sensitivity and specificity of biliary POCUS for gallstones to be 97.0% (95% CI 92.6 to 99.2%) and 99.5% (95% CI 97.3 to 100%), respectively. For cholecystitis, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.8% (95% CI 72.9 to 91.6%) and 98.6% (95% CI 96.4 to 99.6%), respectively. RUS and POCUS were concordant in 72 (81.8%) of 88 cases in which the patient had both studies while HIDA and POCUS were concordant in 24 (70.6%) of 34 cases. POCUS was deemed correct in at least 50% of discrepant cases with RUS and at least 30% of discrepant cases with HIDA.

CONCLUSION

Biliary POCUS has excellent sensitivity and specificity for cholelithiasis; it has lower sensitivity for cholecystitis, but the specificity remains high. Performing a confirmatory RUS or cholescintigraphy after a positive biliary POCUS adds little value, but additional imaging may be useful when POCUS is negative for cholecystitis.

Developing a Simple Score for Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis at the Emergency Department

We aim to develop a diagnostic score for acute cholecystitis that integrates symptoms, physical examinations, and laboratory data to help clinicians for timely detection and early treatment of this disease. We retrospectively collected data from our database from 2010 to 2020. Patients with acute abdominal pain who underwent an ultrasound or computed tomography (CT) scan at the emergency department (ED) were included. Cases were identified by pathological, CT, or ultrasound reports. Non-cases were those who did not fulfill any of these criteria. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of acute cholecystitis. The model included 244 patients suspected of acute cholecystitis. Eighty-six patients (35.2%) were acute cholecystitis confirmed cases. Five final predictors remained within the reduced logistic model: age < 60, nausea and/or vomiting, right upper quadrant pain, positive Murphy’s sign, and AST ≥ two times upper limit of normal. A practical score diagnostic performance was AuROC 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67−0.81). Patients were categorized with a high probability of acute cholecystitis at score points of 9−12 with a positive likelihood ratio of 3.79 (95% CI, 1.68−8.94). ED Chole Score from these five predictors may aid in diagnosing acute cholecystitis at ED. Patients with an ED Chole Score >8 should be further investigated.

Transvaginal US vs. CT in non-pregnant premenopausal women presenting to the ED: clinical impact of the second examination when both are performed

Objective

To determine the clinical impact of the second examination when both CT and TVUS are obtained in the same ED visit for acute pelvic/lower abdominal symptoms in non-pregnant premenopausal women.

Methods

200 consecutive non-pregnant premenopausal women (mean age, 31.8 years; range, 18–49 years) who underwent both ED-based TVUS and abdominopelvic CT evaluation for acute symptoms over a 12 month period were included; 107 women had TVUS first, followed by CT; 93 women had CT first. All relevant clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings were reviewed to establish a final diagnosis. Any additional clinical impact provided by the second imaging test was assessed by two experienced abdominal radiologists.

Results

Initial TVUS was interpreted as normal (n = 63) or mentioned incidental findings (n = 11) in 69% (74/107); subsequent CT established a non-gynecologic GI/GU etiology in 25 (34%). For 37% (34/93) of CT exams interpreted as normal, TVUS added no new information. In 32 cases (34%), TVUS further excluded ovarian torsion/adnexal pathology when initial CT was indeterminate/equivocal. Overall, CT following TVUS provided a key new or alternative diagnosis in 26% (28/107), whereas TVUS after CT provided a relevant new/alternative diagnosis in only 1/93 cases (p < 0.001). In nine cases (8%), CT confirmed a positive US diagnosis but detected relevant additional diagnostic information.

Conclusion

CT following negative TVUS frequently identified a non-gynecologic cause of acute pelvic or lower abdominal symptoms in non-pregnant premenopausal women, whereas the main benefit of TVUS after CT was more confident exclusion of ovarian torsion.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00261-022-03504-6.

Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department 2 (GRACE-2): Low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department

This second Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-2) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic "low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department." The multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding four priority questions for adult emergency department patients with low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain. The intended population includes adults with multiple similar presentations of abdominal signs and symptoms recurring over a period of months or years. The panel reached the following recommendations: (1) if a prior negative computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) has been performed within 12 months, there is insufficient evidence to accurately identify populations in whom repeat CTAP imaging can be safely avoided or routinely recommended; (2) if CTAP with IV contrast is negative, we suggest against ultrasound unless there is concern for pelvic or biliary pathology; (3) we suggest that screening for depression and/or anxiety may be performed during the ED evaluation; and (4) we suggest an opioid-minimizing strategy for pain control. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The GRACE-2 writing group developed clinically relevant questions to address the care of adult patients with low-risk, recurrent, previously undifferentiated abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). Four patient-intervention-comparison-outcome-time (PICOT) questions were developed by consensus of the writing group, who performed a systematic review of the literature and then synthesized direct and indirect evidence to formulate recommendations, following GRADE methodology. The writing group found that despite the commonality and relevance of these questions in emergency care, the quantity and quality of evidence were very limited, and even fundamental definitions of the population and outcomes of interest are lacking. Future research opportunities include developing precise and clinically relevant definitions of low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain and determining the scope of the existing populations in terms of annual national ED visits for this complaint, costs of care, and patient and provider preferences.

The imaging diagnosis of cholecystitis in the adult ED: a comparative multi-reader, multivariable analysis of CT and US image features

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study are (1) to utilize multivariable logistic regression in order to evaluate which image feature combination is most predictive in the diagnosis of cholecystitis for computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) in adult ED patients and (2) to use these results to compare the accuracy of CT and US.

METHODS

For RUQ pain patients undergoing US and CT at the same visit, multiple image features were evaluated independently by 2 radiologists blinded to additional data. Inter-reader variability was measured with the Kappa statistic. Sonographic Murphy's sign (SMS) information was obtained from original reports. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to develop optimal predictive models for each modality. For US, models with/without SMS were compared to establish its relative value.

RESULTS

446 patients met inclusion criteria. For CT, the combination of cholelithiasis, short-axis gallbladder diameter > 3 cm, pericholecystic fluid or inflammation, and mural thickening > 3 mm provided the optimal model for both readers. For US, the optimal model included cholelithiasis, short-axis diameter > 3 cm, mural heterogeneity/striation, and sludge/debris for both readers. Kappa = 0.79-0.96 for included image features. For both readers, CT and US models had equivalent diagnostic performances; the SMS did not contribute significantly to US models.

CONCLUSION

For a diagnosis of cholecystitis in the ED, (1) the optimal image feature combination for CT is cholelithiasis, short-axis diameter > 3 cm, pericholecystic fluid or inflammation, mural thickening > 3 mm; and cholelithiasis, short-axis diameter > 3 cm, mural heterogeneity/striation, sludge/debris for US; (2) CT and US have equivalent diagnostic performance; (3) inter-reader reliability is substantial to excellent for utilized image features; (4) the SMS does not affect US model accuracy.

CT findings and outcomes of acute cholecystitis: is additional ultrasound necessary?

BACKGROUND

While ultrasound is often the preferred imaging modality for suspected acute cholecystitis (AC), CT is often the first line study when patients are being evaluated for abdominal pain. The diagnostic value of CT in the setting of AC is controversial, given the prevalent use of additional imaging.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of CT for diagnosing acute cholecystitis (AC) when used as a first line imaging study for evaluating abdominal pain and assess if additional imaging with ultrasound studies provides additional clinically useful information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Abnormal gallbladder findings in CT imaging studies were queried in a retrospective study over a 25-month period within a large urban health system. Sonographic (US) studies performed within 72 h of the initial CT were also included. Outcomes were determined by surgical pathology, fluid analysis, and clinical outcomes. Cases were stratified by the interpreting radiologist's subjective confidence level of diagnosing AC, and the PPVs were compared between cases using CT without US and cases with both CT and US.

RESULTS

Of the 468 CT studies meeting criteria, 192 were read as concerning for AC. PPV of CT was 44.7% without US and 50.5% when US was positive, which amounted to an insignificant gain (p = 0.41). When subdividing by confidence level, high-confidence positive CTs demonstrated no significant difference without ultrasound (80%) compared to with ultrasound (75%). Less confident reads in CT demonstrated potential gain from ultrasound; in the case of a "probable" CT impression, PPV increased from 45% without US to 90% with a high-confidence ultrasound impression.

CONCLUSION

Based on current practice within a large health system, CT examinations with high suspicion for AC demonstrated little gain from follow-up ultrasound. However, ultrasound may be of benefit when CT interpretations are less confident but still suspicious for AC.

Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: Missed Diagnoses

Abdominal pain is the most common chief complaint in the Emergency Department. Abdominal pain is caused by a variety of gastrointestinal and nongastrointestinal disorders. Some frequently missed conditions include biliary pathology, appendicitis, diverticulitis, and urogenital pathology. The Emergency Medicine clinician must consider all aspects of the patient's presentation including history, physical examination, laboratory testing, and imaging. If no diagnosis is identified, close reassessment of pain, vital signs, and physical examination are necessary to ensure safe discharge. Strict verbal and written return precautions should be provided to the patient.