Detection of Bleeding Complications After Renal Transplant Biopsy

Significance of Arterial Spin Labeling for Reducing Biopsies in Patients With Kidney Allograft Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Although biopsy is often entailed for managing patients with kidney allograft dysfunction, it is associated with potential complications of severe hemorrhage. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a non-invasive technique that assesses tissue perfusion.

PURPOSE

To assess the utility of ASL for the discrimination of patients with post-transplant allograft dysfunction who do not need biopsy from those who need.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

Forty-six patients (34 males/12 females, aged 38.8 ± 9.5 years) with kidney allograft dysfunction, including 31 in which biopsy directly lead to changes in management (NECESSARY group) and 15 in which clinical management did not alter after biopsy (UNNECESSARY group).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0 T and 3D fast-spin echo sequence.

ASSESSMENT

All patients underwent both ASL scan and biopsies. The serum creatinine, proteinuria, pathologic results, and cortical ASL readings were obtained and compared between the two groups.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Chi-square test, independent student t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, receiver-operating characteristic curve. A two-tailed P < 0.05 denoted statistical significance.

RESULTS

The NECESSARY group presented with significantly elevated serum creatinine as compared with the UNNECESSARY group (1.87 ± 0.56 mg/dL vs. 1.31 ± 0.37 mg/dL). The acute composite score was significantly higher in the NECESSARY group than that in the UNNECESSARY group (7 [4-8] vs. 1 [0-2]). Cortical ASL in the NECESSARY group was significantly decreased as compared with the UNNECESSARY group (108.06 [69.96-134.92] mL/min/100 g vs. 153.48 [113.19-160.37] mL/min/100 g). Serum creatinine differentiated UNNCESSARY group from the NECESSARY group with an area under the curve (AUC) and specificity of 0.79 and 54.84%, respectively. By comparison, the cortical ASL yielded an AUC of 0.75 and a specificity of 70.97%. Notably, the specificity was increased to 90.30% by combined use of serum creatinine and cortical ASL.

DATA CONCLUSION

The combined use of ASL and serum creatinine yielded a high specificity for selecting patients who may not need allograft biopsy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

A Universal Bleeding Risk Score in Native and Allograft Kidney Biopsies: A French Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The risk of bleeding after percutaneous biopsy in kidney transplant recipients is usually low but may vary. A pre-procedure bleeding risk score in this population is lacking.

METHODS

We assessed the major bleeding rate (transfusion, angiographic intervention, nephrectomy, hemorrhage/hematoma) at 8 days in 28,034 kidney transplant recipients with a kidney biopsy during the 2010-2019 period in France and compared them to 55,026 patients with a native kidney biopsy as controls.

RESULTS

The rate of major bleeding was low (angiographic intervention: 0.2%, hemorrhage/hematoma: 0.4%, nephrectomy: 0.02%, blood transfusion: 4.0%). A new bleeding risk score was developed (anemia = 1, female gender = 1, heart failure = 1, acute kidney failure = 2 points). The rate of bleeding varied: 1.6%, 2.9%, 3.7%, 6.0%, 8.0%, and 9.2% for scores 0 to 5, respectively, in kidney transplant recipients. The ROC AUC was 0.649 (0.634-0.664) in kidney transplant recipients and 0.755 (0.746-0.763) in patients who had a native kidney biopsy (rate of bleeding: from 1.2% for score = 0 to 19.2% for score = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of major bleeding is low in most patients but indeed variable. A new universal risk score can be helpful to guide the decision concerning kidney biopsy and the choice of inpatient vs. outpatient procedure both in native and allograft kidney recipients.

The impact of blood pressure on the risk of postbiopsy bleeding during the whole procedure of percutaneous kidney biopsy

PURPOSE

To investigate whether BP is related to postbiopsy bleeding in patients undergoing native percutaneous kidney biopsy (PKB) and to evaluate the dynamic changes in blood pressure (BP) pre- and post-kidney biopsy.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. The whole-procedural systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP for patients undergoing ultrasound-guided native PKB from October 2017 to December 2020 were recorded in the study. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias. SBP and DBP were analyzed as the main risk factors for bleeding complications. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to explore the optimal BP thresholds to differentiate between bleeding and nonbleeding. The rates of major bleeding complications were analyzed according to BP thresholds through logistic analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1146 biopsies, 432 (37.7%) patients suffered from postbiopsy bleeding, 88 (7.7%) patients had major bleeding complications, and 344 (30.0%) patients had minor bleeding complications. In the original data, for patients with SBP ≥ 160 mmHg before PKB, the rate of major bleeding complications was 17.6% (7.5% for SBP < 160 mmHg), and the rate of major bleeding complications was 19.0% in patients with DBP ≥ 100 mmHg (7.5% for DBP < 100 mmHg). For patients with DBP ≥ 85 mmHg to 100 mmHg after PKB, the rate of major bleeding complications ranged from 9.5 to 17.5%. The rate of major bleeding complications was lower (6.6-7.3%) in patients with DBP < 100 mmHg to 85 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have high-level BP during the native PKB perioperative period are at higher risk for postbiopsy bleeding. High-level BP here does not refer to traditional hypertension according to the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, but rather BP above a certain threshold related to bleeding risk.

Complications of Percutaneous Kidney Allograft Biopsy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney biopsy is important to guide the management of allograft dysfunction but has a risk of complications. This review aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors of complications after kidney allograft biopsy.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or case-control studies indexed on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov, limited to the English language, from January 2000 to December 2020, including adult and pediatric kidney allograft biopsies. Primary outcomes were gross hematuria, bleeding requiring transfusion, and major complications (requiring interventions such as blood transfusion or surgical or radiological interventions).

RESULTS

The review included 72 studies (40 082 biopsies). The quality of included studies was suboptimal. Pooled rates of gross hematuria, bleeding requiring transfusion, and major complications were 3.18% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.31-4.19], 0.31% (95% CI, 0.15-0.52) and 0.89% (95% CI, 0.61-1.22), respectively. Gross hematuria rates were lower in high-income compared with middle-income countries (2.59% versus 6.44%, P < 0.01) and biopsies performed by radiology as compared with nephrology departments (1.25% versus 3.71%, P < 0.01). Blood transfusion rates were lower in pediatrics than adults (0.0% versus 0.65%, P < 0.01). Major complications were lower in biopsies performed by specialists as compared with trainees (0.02% versus 3.64%, P < 0.01). Graft loss and mortality were extremely rare. Limitations included missing data, few randomized controlled trials, and possible publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of complications after kidney allograft biopsy was low. Given the low quality of included studies, risk factors for complications should be further examined in future studies.

The Tangential Extraperitoneal Retrorenal Approach in Kidney Transplant Biopsy: An Observational Study to Assess Complication and Adequacy Rates

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous kidney allograft biopsy is the gold-standard for pathology work-up. Recent studies postulate better safety and efficacy for tangential approaches, however, there is no recommendation regarding biopsy needle path. In this context, we previously described the unified tangential extraperitoneal retrorenal (TER) approach for standard allograft biopsy.

Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study evaluated safety and efficacy of the TER biopsy approach among 250 patients that underwent 330 ultrasound-guided kidney transplant biopsies between January 2011 and May 2020.

Results: The overall major complication rate was 0.56% per biopsy attempt (1.21% per biopsy) including blood transfusion, arterial embolization and bladder catheterization for gross hematuria in 0.28, 0.14 and 0.14% of biopsy attempts, respectively (0.61, 0.30 and 0.30% of biopsies, respectively). Minor complications included subcapsular and/or perinephric hematoma, superficial bleeding, arteriovenous fistula and gross hematuria in 12.6, 3.0, 2.5 and 1.4% of biopsy attempts, respectively (27.0, 6.4, 5.5 and 3.0% of biopsies, respectively). Sample adequacy rate was 86.7%, ranging from 82.2 to 94.1% if one or ≥two cores were analyzed, respectively. Residents and consultants yielded similar complication and adequacy rates.

Conclusion: According to current literature, ultrasound-guided TER kidney transplant biopsy is a safe and efficient approach eligible for nephrology training.

The impact of blood pressure on the risk of major bleeding complication after renal transplant biopsy

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of elevated blood pressure on the rate of major hemorrhagic complication after renal transplant biopsy.

METHODS

Pre-procedural systolic (SBP), diastolic (SBP), and mean arterial (MAP) blood pressure for consecutive patients undergoing US-guided renal transplant biopsies from 08/01/2015 to 7/31/2017 were retrospectively recorded. Patients who had a major bleeding complication were identified. The risk of complication as a function of SBP, DBP, and MAP was statistically analyzed, with significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Of 1689 biopsies, there were 10 bleeding complications (10/1689, 0.59%). There was no statistically significant difference between biopsies with complication compared to those without complication based on SBP (p = 0.351), DBP (p = 0.088), or MAP (p = 0.132). Using risk dichotomization criteria, the odds ratio for hemorrhagic complication when the patient had SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and DBP ≥ 95 mmHg was 75.63 (95% CI 6.87-516.8, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The rate of hemorrhagic complication from renal transplant biopsy is low, and there is no statistically significant threshold for increased biopsy risk based on SBP, DBP, or MAP alone. The risk of complication was significantly higher only when both the SBP is ≥ 180 mmHg and DBP is ≥ 95 mmHg.

Kidney Tissue Biopsy

Kidney tissue biopsy is a commonly performed procedure which is valuable in the work-up for patients with medical renal disease and renal transplant. This article will review indications, contraindications, technique and potential complications of kidney biopsy.