Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane: Impact of Proposed Modified LI-RADS Criteria on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection

Washout-parametric imaging with Sonazoid for enhanced differentiation of focal liver lesions

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of washout-parametric imaging (WOPI) with that of conventional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (cCEUS) in differentiating focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

A total of 181 FLLs were imaged with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using Sonazoid, and the recordings were captured for 10 minutes in a prospective setting. WOPI was constructed from three images, depicting the arterial phase (peak enhancement), the early portal venous phase (1-minute post-injection), and the vasculo-Kupffer phase (5 or 10 minutes post-injection). The intensity variations in these images were color-coded and superimposed to produce a single image representing the washout timing across the lesions. From the 181 FLLs, 30 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 30 non-HCC malignancies, and 30 benign lesions were randomly selected for an observer study. Both techniques (cCEUS and WOPI) were evaluated by four off-site readers. They classified each lesion as benign or malignant using a continuous rating scale, with the endpoints representing "definitely benign" and "definitely malignant." The diagnostic performance of cCEUS and WOPI was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the DeLong test. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

The difference in average AUC values between WOPI and cCEUS was 0.0062 (95% confidence interval, -0.0161 to 0.0285), indicating no significant difference between techniques. The interobserver agreement was higher for WOPI (ICC, 0.77) than cCEUS (ICC, 0.67).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of WOPI is comparable to that of cCEUS in differentiating FLLs, with superior interobserver agreement.

Intra-individual comparison of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound and SonoVue contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess whether the diagnostic performance of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SZUS) is non-inferior to that of SonoVue contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SVUS) in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in individuals with high risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was conducted from October 2020 to May 2022 and included participants with a high risk of HCC who underwent SZUS and SVUS. All lesions were confirmed by clinical or pathological diagnosis. Each nodule was classified according to the Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017 (CEUS LI-RADS v2017) for SVUS and SZUS and the modified CEUS LI-RADS (using Kupffer phase defect instead of late and mild washout) for SZUS. The diagnostic performance of both two modalities for all observations was compared. Analysis of the vascular phase and Kupffer phase imaging characteristics of CEUS was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifteen focal liver lesions from 113 patients (94 HCCs, 12 non-HCC malignancies, and 9 benign lesions) were analysed. According to CEUS LI-RADS (v2017), SVUS and SZUS showed similar sensitivity (71.3% vs. 72.3%) and specificity (85.7% vs. 81.0%) in HCC diagnosis. However, the modified CEUS LI-RADS did not significantly improve the diagnostic efficacy of Sonazoid compared to CEUS LI-RADS v2017, having equivalent sensitivity (73.4% vs. 72.3%) and specificity (81.0% vs. 81.0%). The agreement between SVUS and SZUS for all observations was 0.610 (95% CI 0.475, 0.745), while for HCCs it was 0.452 (95% CI 0.257, 0.647).

CONCLUSION

Using LI-RADS v2017, SZUS and SVUS showed non-inferior efficacy in evaluating HCC lesions. In addition, adding Kupffer phase defects to SZUS does not notably improve its diagnostic efficacy.

Nomogram based on Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differentiate intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model based on Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (SCEUS) and clinical features to discriminate poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (P-HCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Forty-one ICC and forty-nine P-HCC patients were enrolled in this study. The CEUS LI-RADS category was assigned according to CEUS LI-RADS version 2017. Based on SCEUS and clinical features, a predicated model was established. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and LASSO logistic regression were used to identify the most valuable features, 400 times repeated 3-fold cross-validation was performed on the nomogram model and the model performance was determined by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression and LASSO logistic regression indicated that age (> 51 y), viral hepatitis (No), AFP level (≤  20 µg/L), washout time (≤  45 s), and enhancement level in the Kupffer phase (Defect) were valuable predictors related to ICC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of the nomogram was 0.930 (95% CI: 0.856-0.973), much higher than the subjective assessment by the sonographers and CEUS LI-RADS categories. The calibration curve showed that the predicted incidence was more consistent with the actual incidence of ICC, and 400 times repeated 3-fold cross-validation revealed good discrimination with a mean AUC of 0.851. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram could increase the net benefit for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram based on SCEUS and clinical features can effectively differentiate P-HCC from ICC.

Perfluorobutane-Enhanced Ultrasound for Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Non-hepatocellular Malignancies or Benignancy: Comparison of Imaging Acquisition Methods

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work described here was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of perfluorobutane (PFB)-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from non-HCC malignancies and other benign lesions using different acquisition methods.

METHODS

This prospective study included 69 patients with solid liver lesions larger than 1 cm who were scheduled for biopsy or radiofrequency ablation between September 2020 and March 2021. Lesion diagnosis was designated by three blinded radiologists after reviewing three different sets of acquired images selected according to the following presumed acquisition methods: (i) method A, acquisition up to 5 min after contrast injection; (ii) method B, acquisition up to 1 min after contrast injection with additional Kupffer phase; and (iii) method C, acquisition up to 5 min after contrast injection with additional Kupffer phase.

RESULTS

After excluding 7 technical failures, 62 patients with liver lesions (mean size: 24.2 ± 14.8 mm), which consisted of 7 benign lesions, 37 non-HCC malignancies and 18 HCCs. For the HCC diagnosis, method C had the highest sensitivity (75.9%), followed by method B (72.2%) and method A (68.5%), but failed to exhibit statistical significance (p = 0.12). There was no significant difference with respect to the pooled specificity between the three methods (p = 0.28). Diagnostic accuracy was the highest with method C (87.1%) but failed to exhibit statistical significance (p = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

Image acquisition up to 5 min after contrast injection with additional Kupffer phase could potentially result in high accuracy and sensitivity without loss of specificity in diagnosing HCC with PFB-enhanced ultrasound.

Revolutionising hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: Harnessing contrast-enhanced ultrasound and serological indicators for postoperative early recurrence prediction

This study aimed to develop a noninvasive predictive model for identifying early postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (within 2 years after surgery) based on contrast-enhanced ultrasound and serum biomarkers. Additionally, the model's validity was assessedthrough internal and external validation. Clinical data were collected from patients who underwent liver resection at the First Hospital of Quanzhou and Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital. The data included general information, contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters, Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification, and serum biomarkers. The data from Mengchao Hospital were divided into 2 groups, with a ratio of 6:4, to form the modeling and internal validation sets, respectively. On the other hand, the data from the First Hospital of Quanzhou served as the external validation group. The developed model was named the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Early Recurrence (HCC-ER) prediction model. The predictive efficiency of the HCC-ER model was compared with other established models. The baseline characteristics were found to be well-balanced across the modeling, internal validation, and external validation groups. Among the independent risk factors identified for early recurrence, LI-RADS classification, alpha-fetoprotein, and tumor maximum diameter exhibited hazard ratios of 1.352, 1.337, and 1.135 respectively. Regarding predictive accuracy, the HCC-ER, Tumour-Node-Metastasis, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, and China Liver Cancer models demonstrated prediction errors of 0.196, 0.204, 0.201, and 0.200 in the modeling group; 0.215, 0.215, 0.218, and 0.212 in the internal validation group; 0.210, 0.215, 0.216, and 0.221 in the external validation group. Using the HCC-ER model, risk scores were calculated for all patients, and a cutoff value of 50 was selected. This cutoff effectively distinguished the high-risk recurrence group from the low-risk recurrence group in the modeling, internal validation, and external validation groups. However, the calibration curve of the predictive model slightly overestimated the risk of recurrence. The HCC-ER model developed in this study demonstrated high accuracy in predicting early recurrence within 2 years after hepatectomy. It provides valuable information for developing precise treatment strategies in clinical practice and holds considerable promise for further clinical implementation.

Contrast-enhanced US with Sulfur Hexafluoride and Perfluorobutane: LI-RADS for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was designed for contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) with pure blood pool agents to diagnose hepatocellularfcarcinoma (HCC), such as sulfur hexafluoride (SHF), but Kupffer-cell agents, such as perfluorobutane (PFB), allow additional lesion characterization in the Kupffer phase yet remain unaddressed. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of three algorithms for HCC diagnosis: two algorithms based on CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 for both SHF and PFB and a modified algorithm incorporating Kupffer-phase findings for PFB. Materials and Methods This multicenter prospective study enrolled high-risk patients for HCC from June 2021 to December 2021. Each participant underwent same-day SHF-enhanced US followed by PFB-enhanced US. Each liver observation was assigned three LI-RADS categories according to each algorithm: LI-RADS SHF, LI-RADS PFB, and modified PFB. For modified PFB, observations at least 10 mm with nonrim arterial phase hyperenhancement were upgraded LR-4 to LR-5 if there was no washout with a Kupffer defect and were reassigned LR-M to LR-5 if there was early washout with mild Kupffer defect. The reference standard was pathologic confirmation or composite (typical CT or MRI features, or 1-year size stability and/or reduction). Diagnostic metrics of LR-5 for HCC using the three algorithms were calculated and compared using the McNemar test. Results Overall, 375 patients (mean age, 56 years ± 11 [SD]; 318 male patients, 57 female patients) with 424 observations (345 HCCs, 40 non-HCC malignancies, 39 benign lesions) were enrolled. PFB and SHF both using LI-RADS showed no significant difference in sensitivity (60% vs 58%; P = .41) and specificity (96% vs 95%; P > .99). The modified algorithm with PFB had increased sensitivity (80% vs 58%; P < .001) and a nonsignificant decrease in specificity (92% vs 95%; P = .73) compared with LI-RADS SHF. Conclusion Based on CEUS LI-RADS version 2017, both SHF and PFB achieved high specificity and relatively low sensitivity for HCC diagnosis. When incorporating Kupffer-phase findings, PFB had higher sensitivity without loss of specificity. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR2100047035 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kim in this issue.

Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane With Modified Criteria Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS Version 2018 for Diagnosing HCC in High-Risk Patients

BACKGROUND. Previously proposed modifications to LI-RADS criteria for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) performed using perfluorobutane contrast agent yielded increased sensitivity for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without a significant decrease in specificity. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to compare the diagnostic performance of CEUS with perfluorobutane using modified LI-RADS criteria versus contrast-enhanced CT or MRI using LI-RADS version 2018 (v2018) for characterizing lesions as HCC in high-risk patients. METHODS. This retrospective study included 171 patients (140 men, 31 women; mean age, 54 ± 12 [SD] years) at high-risk for HCC with a pathologically confirmed liver observation evaluated by both CEUS using perfluorobutane and contrast-enhanced CT or MRI between March 2020 and May 2021. A matching algorithm was used to select two patients with HCC for each patient with a non-HCC lesion. Two readers evaluated observations using previously proposed modifications to CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 that classify certain observations as LR-5 rather than as LR-4 or LR-M on the basis of the presence of Kupffer phase defect after perfluorobutane administration; two different readers evaluated observations using CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018. Each reader pair reached consensus. Diagnostic performance was evaluated. RESULTS. A total of 114 patients had HCC, 43 had a non-HCC malignancy, and 14 had a benign lesion. Modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane and CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 showed no significant difference (p > .05) in sensitivity (92.1% vs 89.5%), specificity (87.7% vs 84.2%), or accuracy (90.6% vs 87.7%) of LR-5 for diagnosis of HCC. Of six observations assessed as LR-4 only by CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018, modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane assessed one as LR-3 (benign lesion) and five as LR-5 (all HCC). Of seven observations assessed as LR-M only by CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018, modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane assessed one as LR-3 (non-HCC malignancy) and six as LR-5 (all HCC). Eight of 12 observations assessed as LR-5 only by CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 and 11 of 13 observations assessed as LR-5 only by modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane were HCC. CONCLUSION. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 for HCC diagnosis was not significantly different between modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane and CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support the application of modified CEUS criteria using perfluorobutane for diagnosing HCC in high-risk patients.