Infection-Related Mortality in Recipients of a Kidney Transplant in Australia and New Zealand

Nitrofurantoin as an Add-On to Conventional Prophylaxis for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Recipients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) constitute one of the main complications in kidney recipients, increasing both morbidity and mortality. Due to the resurgence of antimicrobial resistance, new prophylactic approaches are being investigated. Nitrofurantoin is an antibiotic from the nitrofuran group that is effective against several Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms; hence, there has been a resurgence in its prescription for treating MDR pathogens. Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of nitrofurantoin as an add-on to conventional therapy (amikacin + ceftriaxone or cefotaxime) for the treatment of urinary tract infections in kidney recipients. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, we included patients who received a kidney in a tertiary-care hospital. According to the intensive care specialist, group 1 patients were treated with the conventional prophylactic treatment plus nitrofurantoin as an add-on. Group 2 patients were treated only with the conventional prophylactic treatment. They were followed-up for 3 months, and the incidence of urinary tract infections was reported. Results: The UTI incidence for group 1 at 3 months was 20.6%, and for group 2, it was 20.0%; no statistical difference between treatments was observed (p = 0.9). The most commonly isolated pathogens were E. coli (28.5) and K. pneumonie (28.5%). The factor most associated with developing a UTI was female gender (aHR: 7.0; 95% IC 2.3-20.9, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our cohort study, nitrofurantoin as an add-on in conventional therapy did not prove to be effective in preventing UTI development; therefore, other treatment options should be considered as a part of prophylactic treatment.

Infections Following Kidney Transplantation After Exposure to Immunosuppression for Treatment of Glomerulonephritis

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Kidney transplant patients with glomerulonephritis (GN) as their native disease commonly have received pretransplant immunosuppression (PTI). This may contribute to the immunosuppression burden potentially increasing the risk for infections after transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Recipients of a kidney transplant from January 2005 until May 2020 at a tertiary care university teaching hospital.

EXPOSURE

Patients with GN as their native kidney disease who received PTI for treatment of GN (n=184) were compared with nondiabetic recipients of kidney transplants who did not receive PTI (n = 579).

OUTCOME

First occurrence after transplantation of an infection outcome, either viral (BK or cytomegalovirus [CMV] infection) or bacterial.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Cox regression analysis adjusted for age at transplant, sex, race, donor type, year of transplant surgery, dialysis vintage, receipt of T-cell depleting induction, and CMV transplant status.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up period of 5.7 years, patients with GN PTI were not at an increased risk for developing any first viral infection compared with controls (adjusted HR [AHR] 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52-0.91]) nor at increased risk for specific viral infections: BK infection 19.6% vs 26.3% (AHR 0.72 [95% CI, 0.50-1.05]) or CMV infection, 24.5% vs 29.0% (AHR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.54-1.07]), respectively. There was also no increased risk of developing a first bacterial infection: 54.5% vs 57.5% (AHR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.71-1.13]). These findings of no increased risk for infection were independent of the type of PTI used (cyclophosphamide, rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, or calcineurin inhibitor) or the type of T-cell depleting induction therapy (alemtuzumab or antithymocyte globulin) administered.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study, no data on methylprednisone use for PTI, unmeasured confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PTI for the treatment of GN was not associated with an increased risk of viral (BK or CMV) or bacterial infection after transplantation. Additional surveillance for infection after transplantation for patients who received PTI may not be necessary.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Many kidney transplant patients have glomerular disease as the cause of kidney failure. These patients may be exposed to immunosuppression before transplantation, which could increase the risk for infections after receipt of a transplanted kidney. We identified kidney transplant recipients at a university teaching hospital who received immunosuppression before transplant for the treatment of glomerular kidney disease. We examined their risk for infection after transplantation by comparing it with the risk among transplant patients who were not exposed to immunosuppression before transplant. We observed no increased risk for infection after exposure to prior immunosuppression. Therefore, patients exposed to significant amounts of immunosuppression before transplantation may not require special surveillance or medication adjustment for fear of infection after their receipt of a kidney transplant.

Mycophenolate mofetil hampers antibody responses to a broad range of vaccinations in kidney transplant recipients: Results from a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on various vaccination responses in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial (EudraCT nr.: 2014-001372-66), low immunologically risk kidney transplant recipients were randomized to TAC/MMF or TAC-monotherapy (TACmono), six months post-transplantation. One year after transplantation, in a pre-specified sub-study, recipients were vaccinated against pneumococcus, tetanus and influenza. Blood was sampled before and 21 days after vaccination. Adequate vaccination responses were defined by international criteria. A post-hoc analysis was conducted on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination responses within the same cohort.

RESULTS

Seventy-one recipients received pneumococcal and tetanus vaccines (TAC/MMF: n = 37, TACmono: n = 34), with 29 also vaccinated against influenza. When vaccinated, recipients were 60 (54-66) years old, with median eGFR of 54 (44-67) ml/min, tacrolimus trough levels 6.1 (5.4-7.0) ug/L in both groups and TAC/MMF daily MMF dose of 1000 (500-2000) mg. Adequate vaccination responses were: pneumococcal (TAC/MMF 43%, TACmono 74%, p = 0.016), tetanus (TAC/MMF 35%, TACmono 82%, p < 0.0001) and influenza (TAC/MMF 20%, TACmono 71%, p = 0.0092). Only 7% of TAC/MMF responded adequately to all three compared to 36% of TACmono (p = 0.080). Additionally, 40% of TAC/MMF responded inadequately to all three, whereas all TACmono patients responded adequately to at least one vaccination (p = 0.041). Lower SARS-CoV-2 vaccination antibody responses correlated with lower pneumococcal antibody vaccination responses (correlation coefficient: 0.41, p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

MMF on top of tacrolimus severely hampers antibody responses to a broad range of vaccinations.

Efficacy of pre-emptive kidney transplantation for adults with end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pre-emptive kidney transplantation (PEKT), i.e., transplantation performed before initiation of maintenance dialysis, is considered an ideal renal replacement therapy because there is no exposure to long-term dialysis therapy. Therefore, we summarized advantages/disadvantages of PEKT to assist in deciding whether kidney transplantation should be performed pre-emptively.

METHODS

This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021269163. Observational studies comparing clinical outcomes between PEKT and non-PEKT were included; those involving only pediatric recipients or simultaneous multi-organ transplantations were excluded. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases were searched on 1 August 2021. Studies were pooled using the generic inverse-variance method with random effects model, and risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I.

RESULTS

Seventy-six studies were included in the systematic review (sample size, 23-121,853; enrollment year, 1968-2019). PEKT patients had lower all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.78 [95% CI 0.66-0.92]), and lower death-censored graft failure (0.81 [0.67-0.98]). Unadjusted RRs for the following outcomes were comparable between the two patient groups: cardiovascular disease, 0.90 (0.58-1.40); biopsy-proven acute rejection, 0.75 (0.55-1.03); cytomegalovirus infection, 1.04 (0.85-1.29); and urinary tract infection, 0.89 (0.61-1.29). Mean differences in post-transplant QOL score were comparable in both groups. The certainty of evidence for mortality and graft failure was moderate and that for other outcomes was very low following the GRADE classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis shows the potential benefits of PEKT, especially regarding patient and graft survival, and therefore PEKT is recommended for adults with end-stage kidney disease.

Long-term Trends in Infection-Related Mortality in Adults Treated With Maintenance Dialysis

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Infection is 1 of the top 3 causes of death in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. We evaluated the trends over time and risk factors for infection-related deaths among people receiving dialysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We included all adults who began dialysis between 1980 and 2018 in Australia and New Zealand.

EXPOSURE

Age, sex, dialysis modality, and dialysis era.

OUTCOME

Infection-related death.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Incidence was described and standardized mortality ratios (SMR) calculated for infection-related death. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards models were fitted, with non-infection-related death and kidney transplantation treated as competing events.

RESULTS

The study comprised 46,074 patients who received hemodialysis and 20,653 who were treated with peritoneal dialysis who were followed for 164,536 and 69,846 person-years, respectively. There were 38,463 deaths during the follow-up period, 12% of which were ascribed to infection. The overall rate of mortality from infection (per 10,000 person-years) was 185 and 232 for patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, respectively. The rates were 184 and 219 for males and females, respectively; and 99, 181, 255, and 292 for patients aged 18-44, 45-64, 65-74, 75 years and over, respectively. The rates were 224 and 163 for those commencing dialysis in years 1980-2005 and 2006-2018, respectively. The overall SMR declined over time, from 37.1 (95% CI, 35.5-38.8) in years 1980-2005 to 19.3 (95% CI, 18.4-20.3) in years 2006-2018, consistent with the declining 5-year SMR trend (P<0.001). Infection-related mortality was associated with being female, older age, and Aboriginal and/or a Torres Strait Islander or Māori.

LIMITATIONS

Mediation analyses defining the causal relationships between infection type and infection-related death could not be undertaken as disaggregating the data was not feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

The excess risk of infection-related death in patients on dialysis has improved substantially over time but remains more than 20 times higher than in the general population.

A single centre in-depth analysis of death with a functioning kidney graft and reasons for overall graft failure

BACKGROUND

High numbers of unknown classifications and inconsistent methodologies in previous studies make the interpretation of causes leading to graft loss difficult. In addition, data on a holistic view looking at both death with a functioning graft (DWFG) and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) are sparse.

METHODS

In this single-centre study we included 1477 adult kidney transplants performed between 1997 and 2017, of which all 286 DWFGs until the end of observation were analysed and causes for death assigned. Additionally, the results were compared with the causes of 303 DCGFs of the same cohort to evaluate the impact of causes for overall graft loss.

RESULTS

The most frequent causes for DWFG were cardiovascular disease (CVD) in 30.8%, malignancy in 28.3% and infections in 21%. Only 9.4% of reasons for DWFG were unknown. Sudden death occurred in 40% (35/88) of patients classified as DWFG due to CVD. Overall graft loss was related to the effect of immunosuppression in 36.2% [infection 20.9% (123/589), malignancy 15.3% (90/589)] and CVD in 22.4% (132/589). In 27.4% (161/589), graft failure was associated with underimmunosuppression (rejection). For infections (60 DWFG, 63 DCGF) and CVD (88 DWFG, 44 DCGF), a considerable overlap was observed between DWFG and DCGF. For patients >70 years of age at transplantation, medical events accounted for 78% of overall graft losses and only 6.5% were associated with rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

DWFG and DCGF share more causes for graft loss than previously reported and sudden death plays an underestimated role in death with a functioning graft.

Incidence and Outcomes of Patients Receiving Chronic Kidney Replacement Therapy Admitted to Scottish ICUs Between 2009 and 2019-A National Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence and characteristics of ICU admissions in the Scottish population of patients treated with chronic kidney replacement therapy (KRT) over an 11-year period and determine factors associated with post-ICU admission mortality.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

We analyzed admissions to Scottish intensive care environments between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019.

PATIENTS

All patients receiving chronic KRT-including maintenance dialysis and kidney transplant-in Scotland.

INTERVENTION

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Descriptive statistics and factors associated with mortality using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models. From 10,657 unique individuals registered in the Scottish Renal Registry over the 11-year study period and alive as of January 1, 2009, 1,402 adult patients were identified as being admitted to a Scottish critical care setting. Between 2009 and 2019, admissions to ICU increased in a nonlinear manner driven by increases in admissions for renal causes and elective cardiac surgery. The ICU admission rate was higher among patients on chronic dialysis than in kidney transplant recipients (59.1 vs 19.9 per 1,000 person-years), but post-ICU mortality was similar (about 24% at 30 d and 40% at 1 year). Admissions for renal reasons were most common (20.9%) in patients undergoing chronic dialysis, whereas kidney transplant recipients were most frequently admitted for pneumonia (19.3%) or sepsis (12.8%). Adjusted Cox PH models showed that receiving invasive ventilation and vasoactive drugs was associated with an increased risk of death at 30 days post-ICU admission (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.28-2.39 and 1.72; 95% CI, 1.28-2.31, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

With a growing population of kidney transplant recipients and the improved survival of patients on chronic dialysis, the number of ICU admissions is rising in the chronic KRT population. Mortality post-ICU admission is high for these patients.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Effect of pretransplant dialysis vintage on clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplant

The waiting time for deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKT) is increasing. We evaluated DDKT prognosis according to the pretransplant dialysis vintage. A total of 4117 first-time kidney transplant recipients were enrolled from a prospective nationwide cohort in Korea. DDKT recipients were divided into tertiles according to pretransplant dialysis duration. Graft failure, mortality, and composite were compared between DDKT and living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) recipients. Pretransplant dialysis vintage was longer annually in DDKT recipients. In the subdistribution of the hazard model for the competing risk, the first tertile did not show an increased risk of graft failure compared with LDKT recipients; however, the second and third tertile groups had an increased risk of graft failure compared to LDKT recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69-7.63; P < 0.001; aHR 2.37; 95% CI 1.06-5.33; P = 0.037). All DDKT groups showed a significantly higher risk of patient death than LDKT, with the highest risk in the third tertile group (aHR 11.12; 95% CI 4.94-25.00; P < 0.001). A longer pretransplant dialysis period was associated with a higher risk of the composite of patient death and graft failure in DDKT recipients. DDKT after a short period of dialysis had non-inferior results on graft survival compared with LDKT.

Outcomes of acute ischemic stroke in kidney transplant recipients: An analysis of US Nationwide inpatient sample

A kidney transplant is often the treatment of choice for end-stage kidney disease, compared with a lifetime on dialysis. Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have a reduced risk for new strokes than patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G5 treated by dialysis (CKD G5D). However, the benefit of Kidney transplant on post-stroke hospitalization outcomes has not been well studied. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of hospitalization after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in KTRs and patients with CKD G5D. This retrospective study used patient data from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. From 2005 to 2018, patients hospitalized with AIS were classified into 3 groups, including KTRs (n = 1,833), patients with CKD G5D (n = 26,767), and those without CKD (CKD-free, n = 986,945). Patients with CKD G1–G4 or unspecified stage, and graft failure requiring dialysis were excluded. In-hospital mortality, medical complications, transfer to nursing homes, and length of stay (LOS) were compared. Compared to CKD-free group, KTRs had no significant higher risks for in-hospital mortality, transfer to nursing homes, and LOS, but a greater risk for medical complications after adjusting for relevant factors. CKD G5D group had higher risks for in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.93–2.15), medical complications (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.45–1.54), and transfer to nursing homes (aOR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07–1.13), and a 0.07 day (95% CI: 0.06–0.08) longer LOS than CKD-free group. In conclusion, the outcomes of AIS hospitalization were more favorable in KTRs as compared with CKD G5D. Furthermore, the risks for in-hospital mortality, transfer to long-term care facilities, and LOS were not significantly different between KTRs and CKD-free patients.

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection after Kidney Transplantation: A Comprehensive Review

Tuberculosis (TB) in kidney transplant (KT) recipients is an important opportunistic infection with higher incidence and prevalence than in the general population and is associated with important morbidity and mortality. We performed an extensive literature review of articles published between 1 January 2000 and 15 June 2022 to provide an evidence-based review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of TB in KT recipients. We included all studies which reported epidemiological and/or outcome data regarding active TB in KT, and we approached the diagnostic and treatment challenges according to the current guidelines. Prevalence of active TB in KT recipients ranges between 0.3–15.2%. KT recipients with active TB could have a rejection rate up to 55.6%, a rate of graft loss that varies from 2.2% to 66.6% and a mortality rate up to 60%. Understanding the epidemiological risk, risk factors, transmission modalities, diagnosis and treatment challenges is critical for clinicians in providing an appropriate management for KT with TB. Among diagnostic challenges, which are at the same time associated with delay in management, the following should be considered: atypical clinical presentation, association with co-infections, decreased predictive values of screening tests, diverse radiological aspects and particular diagnostic methods. Regarding treatment challenges in KT recipients with TB, drug interactions, drug toxicities and therapeutical adherence must be considered.

Notifiable Infectious Diseases Among Organ Transplant Recipients: A Data-Linked Cohort Study, 2000–2015

Background

Infections, including common communicable infections such as influenza, frequently cause disease after organ transplantation, although the quantitative extent of infection and disease remains uncertain.

Methods

A cohort study was conducted to define the burden of notifiable infectious diseases among all solid organ recipients transplanted in New South Wales, Australia, 2000–2015. Data linkage was used to connect transplant registers to hospital admissions, notifiable diseases, and the death register. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated relative to general population notification rates, accounting for age, sex, and calendar year. Infection-related hospitalizations and deaths were identified.

Results

Among 4858 solid organ recipients followed for 39 183 person-years (PY), there were 792 notifications. Influenza was the most common infection (532 cases; incidence, 1358 [95% CI, 1247–1478] per 100 000 PY), highest within 3 months posttransplant. Next most common was salmonellosis (46 cases; incidence, 117 [95% CI, 87–156] per 100 000 PY), then pertussis (38 cases; incidence, 97 [95% CI, 71–133] per 100 000 PY). Influenza and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) showed significant excess cases compared with the general population (influenza SIR, 8.5 [95% CI, 7.8–9.2]; IPD SIR, 9.8 [95% CI, 6.9–13.9]), with high hospitalization rates (47% influenza cases, 68% IPD cases) and some mortality (4 influenza and 1 IPD deaths). By 10 years posttransplant, cumulative incidence of any vaccine-preventable disease was 12%, generally similar by transplanted organ, except higher among lung recipients. Gastrointestinal diseases, tuberculosis, and legionellosis had excess cases among transplant recipients, although there were few sexually transmitted infections and vector-borne diseases.

Conclusions

There is potential to avoid preventable infections among transplant recipients with improved vaccination programs, health education, and pretransplant donor and recipient screening.

Critically important outcomes for infection in trials in kidney transplantation: An international survey of patients, caregivers and health professionals

BACKGROUND

Infections are a common complication following kidney transplantation, but are reported inconsistently in clinical trials. This study aimed to identify the infection outcomes of highest priority for patients/caregivers and health professionals to inform a core outcome set to be reported in all kidney transplant clinical trials.

METHODS

In an international online survey, participants rated the absolute importance of 16 infections and 8 severity dimensions on 9-point Likert Scales, with 7-9 being critically important. Relative importance was determined using a best-worst scale. Means and proportions of the Likert-scale ratings and best-worst preference scores were calculated.

RESULTS

353 healthcare professionals (19 who identified as both patients/caregiver and healthcare professionals) and 220 patients/caregivers (190 patients, 22 caregivers, 8 who identified as both) from 55 countries completed the survey. Both healthcare professionals and patients/caregivers rated bloodstream (mean 8.4 and 8.5 respectively; aggregate 8.5), kidney/bladder (mean 7.9 and 8.4; aggregate 8.1) and BK virus (mean 8.1 and 8.6; aggregate 8.3) as the top 3 most critically important infection outcomes, whilst infectious death (mean 8.8 and 8.6; aggregate 8.7), impaired graft function (mean 8.4 and 8.7; aggregate 8.5) and admission to the intensive care unit (mean 8.2 and 8.3; aggregate 8.2) were the top 3 severity dimensions. Relative importance (best-worst) scores were consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals and patients/caregivers consistently identified bloodstream infection, kidney/bladder infections and BK virus as the three most important infection outcomes, and infectious death, admission to intensive care unit and infection impairing graft function as the three most important infection severity outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Incidence of Mortality, Acute Kidney Injury and Graft Loss in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The adverse impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on kidney function has been reported since the global pandemic. The burden of COVID-19 on kidney transplant recipients, however, has not been systematically analyzed. A systematic review and meta-analysis with a random-effect model was conducted to explore the rate of mortality, intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, kidney replacement therapy and graft loss in the adult kidney transplant population with COVID-19. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were also performed. Results: we demonstrated a pooled mortality rate of 21% (95% CI: 19−23%), an intensive care unit admission rate of 26% (95% CI: 22–31%), an invasive ventilation rate among those who required intensive care unit care of 72% (95% CI: 62–81%), an acute kidney injury rate of 44% (95% CI: 39–49%), a kidney replacement therapy rate of 12% (95% CI: 9–15%), and a graft loss rate of 8% (95% CI: 5–15%) in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19. The meta-regression indicated that advancing age is associated with higher mortality; every increase in age by 10 years was associated with an increased mortality rate of 3.7%. Regional differences in outcome were also detected. Further studies focused on treatments and risk factor identification are needed.

Preventing Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Where Should We Begin?

Context

Chronic immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections. Although kidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have higher mortality than the general population, data on their risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are unknown.

Subject of Review

A recent single-center screening study from the UK (Transplantation. 2021 Jan 1;105(1):151–7) showed that 89 (10.4%) of 855 consecutive kidney transplant recipients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Risk factors for infection included a nonwhite background, diabetes, and a history of allograft rejection. Risk factors for mortality in individuals who developed COVID-19 were older age and receiving steroids.

Second Opinion

This study shows that the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in kidney transplant recipients is similar to the one observed in the general population in the same area (13%), indicating that transplant recipients are not at increased risk of COVID-19. However, the investigators raise the interesting point that since transplant individuals were advised to shelter earlier than the general population, they may be in fact more susceptible. This statement is hard to substantiate, but the identification of specific risk factors for infection and poor outcomes is crucial to tailor strategies to prevent spread of the infection. This is particularly important, considering that kidney transplant recipients may be at increased risk of prolonged viral spread and in-host viral mutations, making them not just a particularly fragile population for COVID-19 but also a potentially major source of further contagions.

Range and Consistency of Infection Outcomes Reported in Trials Conducted in Kidney Transplant Recipients: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Infection remains a leading cause of death in kidney transplant recipients. This study aimed to assess the scope and consistency of infection outcomes reported in contemporary trials conducted in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A literature review of all randomized trials and trial protocols reporting infection outcomes in adult kidney transplant recipients were identified in the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialized Register from January 2014 to July 2019. Characteristics and infection outcomes from the trials were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 102 included trials, 772 outcome measures were extracted and categorized into 216 unique measures with a median of 3.2 outcome measures per trial (range: 1 to 9). Measures were further grouped into 32 outcomes based on site of infection (14 outcomes) and organism (18 outcomes). The most commonly reported site-specific outcome and organism-specific outcome was systemic infection (71% trials) and cytomegalovirus infection (62% trials), respectively. Outcome metric and methods of aggregation included mean, median, proportion, proportional change and number of patients with at least 1 episode. Across all trials, measures were assessed at 55 different time points with a range of 1 to 11 time points per trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection outcomes in kidney transplant recipients were frequently reported by site and organism but varied widely in terms of outcome, metrics, method of aggregation and time point of measurement. Establishment of core outcomes for infection based on the shared priorities of patients/caregivers and health professionals may improve the consistency, comparability and usefulness of trial evidence.Supplemental Visual Abstract; http://links.lww.com/TP/C169.

Allograft failure in kidney transplant recipients who developed kidney failure secondary to ANCA-associated vasculitis

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides are uncommon causes of kidney failure. In kidney transplant recipients who developed kidney failure secondary to ANCA-associated vasculitis, disease recurrence is unlikely due to ongoing immunosuppression, and patients generally have good immunological outcomes. This study compared transplant outcomes between ANCA-associated vasculitis and other etiologies of kidney disease. All 18 901 adult kidney transplant recipients (1990-2018) were ascertained from the ANZDATA Registry. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare allograft failure between etiologies of kidney disease. Of 254 participants whose primary disease was ANCA-associated vasculitis, 95 (37%) developed allograft failure; of those who developed graft failure, 62 (65%) died with a functioning allograft. Compared with patients with IgA nephropathy, those with ANCA-associated vasculitis had higher rates of all-cause allograft failure (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2-1.7); however, rates of death-censored allograft failure were similar (HR: 1.0, 95% CI: 0.7-1.4). The most frequent causes of death in the ANCA-vasculitis group who died with a functioning graft were infection (23%) and malignancy (36%). Kidney transplant recipients who developed kidney failure secondary to ANCA-associated vasculitis may have had a higher risk of dying due to complications of immunosuppression compared with most other causes of kidney failure; however, they also had lower risks of disease recurrence and rejection.

Identification of Patient Characteristics Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Outcome in Kidney Transplant Patients Using Serological Screening

BACKGROUND

From population studies, solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of mortality from RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 infection. The risk factors associated with infection acquisition and mortality in transplant recipients using serological data have not been reported.

METHODS

From 1725 maintenance transplant recipients, 855 consecutive patients were screened for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Serological screening utilized assays to detect both the N protein and receptor binding domain antibodies. Thirty-three of 855 (3.9%) of the screened patients had prior infection confirmed with RT-PCR. Twenty-one additional patients from our 1725 maintenance cohort with RT-PCR confirmed infection were included in our analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine of 855 (10.4%) patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Fifty-nine of 89 (66.3%) cases were patients newly identified as exposed, while 30/89 (33.7%) seropositive patients had previous infection confirmed by RT-PCR. A diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR or Ab+) was associated with being from a noncaucasoid background, P = 0.015; having a diagnosis of diabetes, P = 0.028 and a history of allograft rejection, P < 0.01. Compared with the RT-PCR+ cohort, patients with serological-proven infection alone were more likely to be receiving tacrolimus monotherapy, P < 0.01, and less likely to have a diagnosis of diabetes, P = 0.012. Seventeen of 113 (15.0%) of all patients with infection (RT-PCR and Ab+) died. Risk factors associated with survival were older age, odds ratio (OR): 1.07 (1.00-1.13), P = 0.041; receiving prednisolone, OR: 5.98 (1.65-21.60), P < 0.01 and the absence of diabetes, OR: 0.27 (0.07-0.99), P = 0.047.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies risk factors and outcome for COVID-19 infection incorporating data on serologically defined infection and highlights the important contribution of immunosuppression regimen on outcomes.

Analysis of risk factors for early urinary tract infection after kidney transplantation

Background

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common kind of infection in the early stage after kidney transplantation. Although many studies have investigated the risk factors for UTI following kidney transplantation, few studies have focused on the risk factors for UTI in the early stage after transplantation.

Methods

The early-stage data of patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2018 and December 2019 in a first-class tertiary hospital in Suzhou, China, were retrospectively analyzed. The general and UTI information of the recipients was subjected to univariate analysis. Variables with statistical significance in the univariate analysis were included in a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

A total of 129 recipients were recruited, among whom 62 patients had a UTI in the early stage after kidney transplantation (48.1%), and the median (interquartile range) of onset time was 5 (4, 10) days after the surgery. A total of 324 strains of UTI pathogens were detected in the 62 recipients after kidney transplantation, 279 of which were gram-negative bacilli (86.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that female sex and delayed graft function (DGF) were independent risk factors for early-stage UTI, with odds ratios of 0.095 and 3.753, respectively.

Conclusions

The incidence of early UTI after kidney transplantation is high. Females and DGF patients are more prone to UTIs. Comprehensive prevention and treatment measures should be taken as early as possible against the risk factors to reduce the incidence of UTI.

Secondary antibody deficiency is associated with development of infection in kidney transplantation: Results of a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

We performed a multicenter study to assess the association between secondary antibody deficiency (immunoglobulin G [IgG] hypogammaglobulinemia combined with low levels of specific antibodies) and development of infection in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 250 adult kidney recipients at four centers. The assessment points were before transplantation and 7 and 30 days after transplantation. The immune parameters were as follows: IgG, IgA, and IgM and complement factors C3 and C4 tested by nephelometry; specific IgG antibodies to cytomegalovirus (CMV) and IgG and IgG2 antibodies to pneumococcal polysaccharide (anti-PPS) determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The clinical follow-up period lasted 6 months. The clinical outcomes were CMV disease and recurrent bacterial infections requiring antimicrobial therapy.

STATISTICS

Multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

At day 7, IgG hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG levels < 700 mg/dL) combined with low IgG anti-CMV antibody titers (defined as levels < 10 000 units) was present in 12% of kidney recipients. IgG hypogammaglobulinemia combined with low IgG anti-PPS antibody titers (defined as levels < 10 mg/dL) at 1 month after kidney transplantation were recorded in 16% of patients. At day 7 the combination of IgG hypogammaglobulinemia and low anti-CMV titers was independently associated with the development of CMV disease (odds ratio [OR], 6.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-41.31; P = .033). At day 30 after transplantation, the combination of IgG < 700 mg/dL and IgG anti-PPS < 10 mg/dL, was independently associated with recurrent bacterial infection (OR, 5.942; 95% CI, 1.943-18.172; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

In a prospective multicenter study, early immunologic monitoring of secondary antibody deficiency proved useful for the identification of kidney recipients who developed severe infection.

Death after Kidney Transplantation: An Analysis by Era and Time Post-Transplant

BACKGROUND

Mortality risk after kidney transplantation can vary significantly during the post-transplant course. A contemporary assessment of trends in all-cause and cause-specific mortality at different periods post-transplant is required to better inform patients, clinicians, researchers, and policy makers.

METHODS

We included all first kidney-only transplant recipients from 1980 through 2018 from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. We compared adjusted death rates per 5-year intervals, using a piecewise exponential survival model, stratified by time post-transplant or time post-graft failure.

RESULTS

Of 23,210 recipients, 4765 died with a functioning graft. Risk of death declined over successive eras, at all periods post-transplant. Reductions in early deaths were most marked; however, recipients ≥10 years post-transplant were 20% less likely to die in the current era compared with preceding eras (2015-2018 versus 2005-2009, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.90). In 2015-2018, cardiovascular disease was the most common cause of death, particularly in months 0-3 post-transplant (1.18 per 100 patient-years). Cancer deaths were rare early post-transplant, but frequent at later time points (0.93 per 100 patient-years ≥10 years post-transplant). Among 3657 patients with first graft loss, 2472 died and were not retransplanted. Death was common in the first year after graft failure, and the cause was most commonly cardiovascular (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Reductions in death early and late post-transplant over the past 40 years represent a major achievement. Reductions in cause-specific mortality at all time points post-transplant are also apparent. However, relatively greater reductions in cardiovascular death have increased the prominence of late cancer deaths.

Early effects of first-line treatment with anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) is a major determinant of late allograft failure. Rituximab/immunoglobulins (IVIg) + plasma exchange (PLEX) showed controversial results in cAMR treatment. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized anti-interleukin 6 receptor antibody, has been recently used as rescue therapy in patients non-responsive to rituximab/IVIg/PLEX with favorable outcomes. Whether TCZ acts "per se" or requires a priming effect from previous treatments is currently unknown.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with cAMR were treated with TCZ as a first-line therapy and followed for a median time of 20.7 months.

RESULTS

Despite the majority of patients experiencing advanced transplant glomerulopathy (TG) at diagnosis (60% with cg3), glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria stabilized during the follow-up, with a significant reduction in donor-specific antibodies. Protocol biopsies after 6 months demonstrated significant amelioration of microvascular inflammation and no TG, C4d deposition, or IF/TA progression. Gene-expression and immunofluorescence analysis showed upregulation of three genes (TJP-1, AKR1C3, and CASK) involved in podocyte, mesangial, and tubular restoration.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab adopted as a first-line approach in cAMR was associated with early serological and histological improvements and functional stabilization even in advanced TG, suggesting a role for the use of TCZ alone with the avoidance of unnecessary previous immunosuppressants.

Predictive tools to determine risk of infection in kidney transplant recipients

Introduction: Infection represents a major complication after kidney transplantation (KT). Therapeutic drug monitoring is essentially the only approach for the adjustment of immunosuppression in current practice, with suboptimal results. The implementation of immune monitoring strategies may contribute to minimizing the risk of adverse events attributable to over-immunosuppression without compromising graft outcomes.Areas covered: The present review (based on PubMed/MEDLINE searches from database inception to November 2019) is focused on immune biomarkers with no antigen specificity (non-pathogen-specific), including serum levels of immunoglobulins and complement factors, peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations, soluble CD30, intracellular ATP production by stimulated CD4⁺ T-cells, and other cell-based immune assays. We also summarized recent advances in the use of replication kinetics of latent viruses to assess the functionality of T-cell immunity, with focus on the nonpathogenic anelloviruses. Finally, the composite risk scores reported in the literature are critically discussed.Expert opinion: Notable efforts have been made to develop an enlarging repertoire of immune biomarkers and prediction models, although most of them still lack technical standardization and external validation. Preventive interventions based on these tools (prolongation of prophylaxis, tapering of immunosuppression, or immunoglobulin replacement therapy in hypogammaglobulinemic patients) remain to be defined, ideally in the context of controlled trials.

Surveillance of common infections in the early period after renal transplantation in a national center: 2014-2017

BACKGROUND

Infection prevention and timely and effective treatment are among the major aims of care in kidney transplant recipients. Pre-transplant vaccination and pre-transplant viral screening have been extensively studied and are now considered standard practice. Early post-operative infection surveillance is mandatory in other vulnerable cohorts, but has not been extensively studied in this population. We hypothesized that surveillance of the most common bacterial infection types in the post-transplant setting would be beneficial and identify key areas for improvement.

METHODS

All adult kidney transplant recipients whose surgeries were performed in the Irish national kidney transplant unit over a 1-year period had prospective early post-transplant (first 30 days) infection surveillance in 2014 for surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and secondary bloodstream infections (Group T0). Several key changes were implemented following scrutiny of infection patterns and clinical practice. Subsequently, infection surveillance was undertaken for 2016 and 2017 (Group T1) to assess the impact of these changes.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2017, the number of kidney transplants increased by 32%. The following aspects of clinical practice were the focus of change following analysis of Group T0 data: timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) administration, choice of SAP antimicrobial agent, and routine microbiological testing in the peri-operative period. Following implementation of these changes, the timing of SAP administration was greatly improved (45%-100% of cases appropriately timed). The infection rate decreased from 8.9% to 7.4% in 2016, with a further decrease to 4% in 2017 (OR 0.42 (95% CI: 0.16-1.10); P = .08). Compliance with pre-operative microbiological screening improved in Group T1.

CONCLUSIONS

Simple clinical practice changes, implemented upon analysis of common bacterial infection surveillance data in the first 30 days after kidney transplantation resulted in more effective SAP administration and improved compliance with routine microbiological testing in the peri-operative period. These interventions have potentially contributed to reduced early post-operative infection rates, despite increased transplant activity in the unit. Infection surveillance is an important and under-utilized way of reducing infections in this vulnerable patient cohort.

Urinary Oxalate Excretion and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Epidemiologic studies have linked urinary oxalate excretion to risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and end-stage renal disease. We aimed to investigate whether urinary oxalate, in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTR), is prospectively associated with risk of graft failure. In secondary analyses we evaluated the association with post-transplantation diabetes mellitus, all-cause mortality and specific causes of death. Oxalate excretion was measured in 24-h urine collection samples in a cohort of 683 KTR with a functioning allograft ≥1 year. Mean eGFR was 52 ± 20 mL/min/1.73 m2. Median (interquartile range) urinary oxalate excretion was 505 (347-732) µmol/24-h in women and 519 (396-736) µmol/24-h in men (p = 0.08), with 302 patients (44% of the study population) above normal limits (hyperoxaluria). A consistent and independent inverse association was found with all-cause mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, p = 0.01). Cause-specific survival analyses showed that this association was mainly driven by an inverse association with mortality due to infection (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83, p = 0.004), which remained materially unchanged after performing sensitivity analyses. Twenty-four-hour urinary oxalate excretion did not associate with risk of graft failure, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular mortality, mortality due to malignancies or mortality due to miscellaneous causes. In conclusion, in KTR, 24-h urinary oxalate excretion is elevated in 44% of KTR and inversely associated with mortality due to infectious causes.