Progression of Interstitial Fibrosis during the First Year after Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation among Patients with and without Delayed Graft Function

Impact of Deceased-donor Acute Kidney Injury on Kidney Transplantation

Even as record numbers of deceased donors are undergoing organ recovery, the global transplant community continues to struggle with a shortage of donor organs and a high organ discard rate. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in many hospitalized patients, including up to 25% of patients in critical condition. Registry studies have shown a significant increase in nonrecovery or organ discard rates in AKI donors, despite most studies reporting similar clinical outcomes compared with non-AKI donors. This review aims to capture the salient information learned from these studies and to summarize the efforts that have been made to gain a more granular understanding of how kidneys from donors with AKI behave posttransplant. In particular, we reviewed the studies that analyzed the clinical outcomes in different stages of AKI and AKI in marginal donors, such as kidney donor profile index of >85%, older donors, and donation after circulatory death donors. We summarized studies investigating molecular biomarkers, transcriptomics, and possible future therapeutic targets for postdonation AKI.

Duration of Dialysis in Acute Kidney Injury Donors and Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) kidneys, including those from donors on dialysis, are often underutilized, although there is increasing data available demonstrating good transplant outcomes. To date, data on the duration of donor dialysis and transplant outcomes are limited.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center study of deceased donor kidney transplants from 2010 to 2022. The study cohort consisted of recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants from donors with AKI and on dialysis. Three groups were identified based on the predetermined interquartile range of donor dialysis duration: 1 to 2 dialysis days, 3 to 4 dialysis days, and 5 or more dialysis days.

RESULTS

During this period, 765 AKI deceased donor transplants were performed, of which 230 were from donors on dialysis. The median dialysis duration was 2 days with a maximum of 13 days. Across the 3 groups, there were no differences in recipient age (p = 0.23) or dialysis vintage (p = 0.70). Donor age (p = 0.86) and kidney donor profile index (p = 0.57) were comparable between the groups. Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants from donors on dialysis 5 or more days had lower terminal creatinine levels (p = 0.003) and longer cold ischemia times (p = 0.04). Posttransplant, the median length of hospital stay was 3 days for all groups (p = 0.75). There were no differences in delayed graft function occurrence (94.4% vs 86.8% vs 92.1%, p = 0.19), duration of delayed graft function (p = 0.56), or readmissions (p = 0.99). At 1 year posttransplant, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.76), patient survival (p = 0.82), or death-censored graft survival (p = 0.28) were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent outcomes have been observed in AKI deceased donor kidney transplants, including those coming from donors on dialysis. In this small cohort, the duration of donor dialysis did not adversely affect outcomes. Cautious expansion of the donor pool, including donors on dialysis, should be considered given the ongoing organ shortage.

Kidney Survival Impact of Delayed Graft Function Depends on Kidney Donor Risk Index: A Single-Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a significant challenge in renal transplantation, particularly with deceased donors, necessitating early postoperative dialysis. The prolonged effects of medium- and long-term DGF remain uncertain, marked by contradictory graft survival outcomes. This incongruity might arise from the inherent graft resilience and regenerative capacity during transplantation. This study investigates DGF's impact on graft survival, focusing on grafts displaying favorable (KDRI < 1) and unfavorable outcomes (KDRI ≥ 1).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study (January 2015-December 2019), we assessed kidney transplants at our center, excluding multiorgan simultaneous cases, primary non-functioning grafts, and surgical complications causing graft loss. Patients were categorized into DGF presence or absence groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses, alongside propensity score matching (PSM), were performed.

RESULTS

The study encompassed 322 deceased donor kidneys, with 83 encountering DGF. Grafts with higher KDRI indices (KDRI ≥ 1) and DGF exhibited a notably increased graft loss risk (HR: 4.17, 95% CI: 1.93-9.01). However, lower-KDRI donor grafts displayed no significant disparities between the DGF and non-DGF groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed graft function (DGF) development significantly contributes to graft loss in kidney transplants, particularly in grafts with KDRI ≥ 1.

Past, Current, and Future Perspectives on Transplanting Acute Kidney Injury Kidneys

(1) Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) kidneys have high non-utilization rates due to concerns regarding unfavorable outcomes. In this paper, we aimed to review the past, present, and future opinions on AKI kidneys. (2) Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for topics relevant to AKI kidney transplantation. (3) Results: Current short- and long-term data on AKI kidneys have demonstrated good outcomes including favorable graft function and survival. The role of procurement biopsies is controversial, but they have been shown to be beneficial in AKI kidneys by allowing clinicians to differentiate between reversible tubular injury and irreversible cortical necrosis. Machine perfusion has also been applied to AKI kidneys and has been shown to reduce delayed graft function (DGF). The incidence of DGF increases with AKI severity and its management can be challenging. Strategies employed to counteract this have included early initiation of dialysis after kidney transplantation, early targeting of adequate immunosuppression levels to minimize rejection risk, and establishment of outpatient dialysis. (4) Conclusions: Despite good outcomes, there continue to be barriers that impact AKI kidney utilization. Successful strategies have included use of procurement biopsies or machine perfusion and expectant management of DGF. With increasing experience, better use of AKI kidneys can result in additional opportunities to expand the donor pool.

Effects of Delayed Graft Function on Transplant Outcomes: A Meta-analysis

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent complication of kidney transplantation, but its impact on long- and short-term transplant outcomes is unclear. We conducted a systematic literature search for studies published from 2007 to 2020 investigating the association between DGF and posttransplant outcomes. Forest plots stratified between center studies and registry studies were created with pooled odds ratios. Posttransplant outcomes including graft failure, acute rejection, patient mortality, and kidney function were analyzed. Of the 3422 articles reviewed, 38 papers were included in this meta-analysis. In single-center studies, patients who experienced DGF had increased graft failure (odds ratio [OR] 3.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-6.17; P < 0.01), acute allograft rejection (OR 1.84; 95% CI, 1.30-2.61; P < 0.01), and mortality (OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.53-3.50; P < 0.01) at 1-y posttransplant. Registry studies showed increased graft failure (OR 3.66; 95% CI, 3.04-4.40; P < 0.01) and acute rejection (OR 3.24; 95% CI, 1.88-5.59; P < 0.01) but not mortality (OR 2.27; 95% CI, 0.97-5.34; P = 0.06) at 1-y posttransplant. DGF was associated with increased odds of graft failure, acute rejection, and mortality. These results in this meta-analysis could help inform the selection process, treatment, and monitoring of transplanted kidneys at high risk of DGF.

Use of Machine Learning Consensus Clustering to Identify Distinct Subtypes of Kidney Transplant Recipients With DGF and Associated Outcomes

Data and transplant community opinion on delayed graft function (DGF), and its impact on outcomes, remains varied. An unsupervised machine learning consensus clustering approach was applied to categorize the clinical phenotypes of kidney transplant (KT) recipients with DGF using OPTN/UNOS data. DGF was observed in 20.9% (n = 17,073) of KT and most kidneys had a KDPI score <85%. Four distinct clusters were identified. Cluster 1 recipients were young, high PRA re-transplants. Cluster 2 recipients were older diabetics and more likely to receive higher KDPI kidneys. Cluster 3 recipients were young, black, and non-diabetic; they received lower KDPI kidneys. Cluster 4 recipients were middle-aged, had diabetes or hypertension and received well-matched standard KDPI kidneys. By cluster, one-year patient survival was 95.7%, 92.5%, 97.2% and 94.3% (p < 0.001); one-year graft survival was 89.7%, 87.1%, 91.6%, and 88.7% (p < 0.001). There were no differences between clusters after accounting for death-censored graft loss (p = 0.08). Clinically meaningful differences in recipient characteristics were noted between clusters, however, after accounting for death and return to dialysis, there were no differences in death-censored graft loss. Greater emphasis on recipient comorbidities as contributors to DGF and outcomes may help improve utilization of DGF at-risk kidneys.

Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death Using Normothermic Regional Perfusion Does Not Increase Graft Fibrosis in the First Year Posttransplant Surveillance Biopsy

OBJECTIVES

The number of kidney transplants obtained from controlled donations after circulatory death is increasing, with long-term outcomes similar to those obtained with donations after brain death. Extraction using normothermic regional perfusion can improve results with controlled donors after circulatory death; however, information on the histological impact and extraction procedure is scarce.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated all kidney transplants performed from October 2014 to December 2019, in which a follow-up kidney biopsy had been performed at 1-year follow-up, comparing controlled procedures with donors after circulatory death and normothermic regional perfusion versus donors after brain death. Interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy was assessed by adding the values of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, according to the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology.

RESULTS

When we compared histological data from 66 transplants with donations after brain death versus 24 transplants with donations after circulatory death and normothermic regional perfusion, no differences were found in the degree of fibrosis in the 1-year follow-up biopsy (1.7 ± 1.3 vs 1.7 ± 1.1; P = .971) or in the ratio of patients with increased fibrosis calculated as interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy >2 (18% vs 13%; P = .522). In our multivariate analysis, which included acute rejection, expanded criteria donation, and the type of donation, no variable was independently related to an increased risk of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy >2.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of kidney grafts procured in our center using controlled procedures with donors after circulatory death and normothermic regional perfusion were indistinguishable from those obtained from donors after brain death, showing the same degree of fibrosis in the 1-year posttransplant surveillance biopsy. Our data support the conclusion that normothermic regional perfusion should be the method of choice for extraction in donors after circulatory death.

Outcomes of Dual Kidney Transplants from High KDPI Kidneys are Superior Compared to Single Kidney High KDPI Transplants at One-Year

Dual kidney transplantation (DKT), utilizing two adult kidneys from the same donor for one recipient, has been used as way to expand the available donor pool. These kidneys often come from high Kidney Donor Profile Index donors (KDPI >85%). Data comparing outcomes between high KDPI DKT and single kidney transplants (SKT) remain limited. We assessed outcomes of 336 high KDPI kidney transplants performed at our center; 11.0% (n = 37) were DKT. Recipients of DKT were older (p = 0.02) and donors had a higher KDPI score (median 96% vs. 91%, p<0.0001). DKT operative time was higher compared to SKT (+1.4 hours, p<0.0001). There were no differences in delayed graft function (54.1% vs. 51.5%, p = 0.77) and hospital length of stay (median 4.0 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.21) between DKT and SKT. Grade I Clavien-Dindo complications occurred in 8.1% of DKT and 13.7% of SKT (p = 0.008). There were no grade IVa, IVb or V complications in either group. DKT had more glomerulosclerosis (p = 0.04), interstitial fibrosis (p = 0.02), tubular atrophy (p = 0.01), and arterial thickening (p = 0.03) on one-year protocol biopsies. Estimated glomerular filtration was higher for DKT at one- (p = 0.004) and two-years post-transplant (p = 0.01). There were no differences in patient (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.5-3.3, p = 0.58) or graft (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5-2.3, p = 0.83) survival. Good outcomes can be achieved with DKT using high KDPI kidneys with moderate chronic changes. DKT is a good option to help further utilize high KDPI kidneys and minimize discard. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Duration of delayed graft function and its impact on graft outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on kidney transplant outcomes. We hypothesize that the duration of DGF, rather than DGF itself, is associated with long-term kidney graft function.

METHODS

We analyzed all deceased donor kidney transplants (DDKT) done at our center between 2008 to 2020. We determined factors associated with DGF duration. DGF duration was assessed at three 14-day intervals: < 14 DGF days, 14-27 DGF days, > 28 DGF days. We studied the impact of DGF duration on survival and graft function and resource utilization, including hospital length of stay and readmissions.

RESULTS

1714 DDKT recipients were included, 59.4% (n = 1018) had DGF. The median DGF duration was 10 days IQR (6,15). The majority of recipients (95%) had resolution of DGF within 28 days. Donor factors associated with DGF days were longer cold ischemia time, donor on inotropes, older age, donation after circulatory death, higher terminal creatinine, and hypertension. Recipient factors associated with increased DGF duration included male sex, length on dialysis before transplant, and higher body mass index. There were no differences in acute rejection events or interstitial fibrosis progression by 4 months when comparing DGF days. The median length of stay was 3 days. However, readmissions increased with increasing DGF duration. Death-censored graft survival was not associated with the length of DGF except when DGF lasted > 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Inferior graft survival was observed only in recipients of DDKT with DGF lasting beyond 28 days. DGF lasting < 28 days had no impact on graft survival. Duration of DGF, rather than DGF itself, is associated with graft survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospective study approved by Mayo Clinic IRB number ID: 20-011561.

Computer-assisted evaluation enhances the quantification of interstitial fibrosis in renal implantation biopsies, measures differences between frozen and paraffin sections, and predicts delayed graft function

Background

(Pre-)Implantation biopsies provide important data on the quality of donor kidneys. Interstitial fibrosis, as a known predictor for kidney disease progression, is an essential feature of this evaluation. However, the assessment of frozen sections of implantation biopsies is challenging and can result in the disposal of candidate organs. We sought to apply digital image analysis (DIA) to quantify the differences between frozen and paraffin sections when evaluating interstitial fibrosis, identify factors that influence these variations and test the predictive value of the computerised measures.

Methods

We quantified the differences between frozen and paraffin sections in the same biopsy samples by measuring Sirius red-stained interstitial areas (SRIA) in DIA. We compared them to the original reports, and retrospectively correlated our findings to clinical data, graft function and outcome in 73 patients.

Results

Frozen sections display a broader interstitial area than paraffin sections, in some cases up to one-third more (mean difference + 7.8%, range − 7 to 29%). No donor-related factors (age or gender, cold ischemia time, or non-heart-beating donor) influenced significantly this difference. Compared to the original assessment of frozen vs paraffin sections in optical microscopy, the DIA of interstitial fibrosis shows a higher consistency (ICC 0.69). Our approach further allows to distinguish SRIA in paraffin sections as an independent predictor for delayed graft function (OR = 1.1; p = 0.028).

Conclusions

DIA is superior to and more consistent than routine optic microscopy for interstitial fibrosis evaluation. This method could improve implantation biopsy diagnostics and help to reduce disposal of organs.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40620-022-01315-y.

Kidney Transplant Outcomes after Prolonged Delayed Graft Function

Background: The protracted recovery of renal function may be an actionable marker of post-transplant adverse events, but a paucity of data are available to determine if the duration of graft recovery serves to stratify risk. Materials and Methods: Single-center data of adult-isolated deceased-donor kidney transplant (KTX) recipients between 1 July 2015 and 31 December 2018 were stratified by delayed graft function (DGF) duration, defined as time to serum creatinine < 3.0 mg/dL. Results: Of 355 kidney transplants, the time to creatinine < 3.0 mg/dL was 0−3 days among 96 cases (DGF ≤ 3), 4−10 days among 85 cases (DGF4-10), 11−20 days among 93 cases (DGF11-20), and ≥21 days for 81 cases (DGF ≥ 21). DGF ≥ 21 recipients were significantly more likely to be male, non-sensitized, and receive kidneys from donors that were older, with donation after circulatory death, non-mandatory share, hypertensive, higher KDPI, higher terminal creatinine, and longer cold and warm ischemia time. On multivariate analysis, DGF ≥ 21 was associated with a 5.73-fold increased odds of 12-month eGFR < 40 mL/min compared to DGF ≤ 3. Lesser degrees of DGF had similar outcomes. Conclusions: Prolonged DGF lasting over 20 days signifies a substantially higher risk for reduced eGFR at 1 year compared to lesser degrees of DGF, thus serving as a threshold indicator of increased risk.

Deep learning identified pathological abnormalities predictive of graft loss in kidney transplant biopsies

Interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and inflammation are major contributors to kidney allograft failure. Here we sought an objective, quantitative pathological assessment of these lesions to improve predictive utility and constructed a deep-learning-based pipeline recognizing normal vs. abnormal kidney tissue compartments and mononuclear leukocyte infiltrates. Periodic acid- Schiff stained slides of transplant biopsies (60 training and 33 testing) were used to quantify pathological lesions specific for interstitium, tubules and mononuclear leukocyte infiltration. The pipeline was applied to the whole slide images from 789 transplant biopsies (478 baseline [pre-implantation] and 311 post-transplant 12-month protocol biopsies) in two independent cohorts (GoCAR: 404 patients, AUSCAD: 212 patients) of transplant recipients to correlate composite lesion features with graft loss. Our model accurately recognized kidney tissue compartments and mononuclear leukocytes. The digital features significantly correlated with revised Banff 2007 scores but were more sensitive to subtle pathological changes below the thresholds in the Banff scores. The Interstitial and Tubular Abnormality Score (ITAS) in baseline samples was highly predictive of one-year graft loss, while a Composite Damage Score in 12-month post-transplant protocol biopsies predicted later graft loss. ITASs and Composite Damage Scores outperformed Banff scores or clinical predictors with superior graft loss prediction accuracy. High/intermediate risk groups stratified by ITASs or Composite Damage Scores also demonstrated significantly higher incidence of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline and subsequent graft damage. Thus, our deep-learning approach accurately detected and quantified pathological lesions from baseline or post-transplant biopsies and demonstrated superior ability for prediction of post-transplant graft loss with potential application as a prevention, risk stratification or monitoring tool.

Timing of Kidney Clamping and Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The fact that metabolism and immune function are regulated by an endogenous molecular clock that generates circadian rhythms suggests that the magnitude of ischemia reperfusion, and subsequent inflammation on kidney transplantation, could be affected by the time of the day.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We evaluated 5026 individuals who received their first kidney transplant from deceased heart-beating donors. In a cause-specific multivariable analysis, we compared delayed graft function and graft survival according to the time of kidney clamping and declamping. Participants were divided into those clamped between midnight and noon (ante meridiem [am] clamping group; 65%) or clamped between noon and midnight (post meridiem [pm] clamping group; 35%), and, similarly, those who underwent am declamping (25%) or pm declamping (75%).

RESULTS

Delayed graft function occurred among 550 participants (27%) with am clamping and 339 (34%) with pm clamping (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.98; P=0.03). No significant association was observed between clamping time and overall death-censored graft survival (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.10; P=0.37). No significant association of declamping time with delayed graft function or graft survival was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Clamping between midnight and noon was associated with a lower incidence of delayed graft function, whereas declamping time was not associated with kidney graft outcomes.

Successful outcomes with transplanting kidneys from deceased donors with acute kidney injuryon temporary renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine outcomes with transplanting kidneys from deceased donors with severe acute kidney injury requiring acute renal replacement therapy (RRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 172 recipients received a kidney from donors with acute kidney injury stage 3 (AKIN3) requiring RRT. We compared the study group to 528 recipients who received a kidney from donors with AKIN stage 3 not on RRT and 463 recipients who received < 85% Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) AKIN stage 0 kidney.

RESULTS

The study group donors were younger compared to the 2 control groups. Despite higher DGF in the study group, the length of hospital stay and acute rejection were similar. Death censored graft survival (96% AKIN3-RRT vs. 97%AKIN3 no RRT vs. 96% KDPI < 85% AKIN0, P = 0.26) and patient survival with functioning graft at 1 year (95% across all groups, P = 0.402) were similar. The estimated glomerular filtration rate were similar across the 3 groups after first month. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score ≥ 2 on protocol biopsy at time 0, 4 and 12 months were similar. Primary nonfunction was rare and associated with high KDPI.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplanting selected kidneys from deceased donors with AKIN3 requiring RRT is safe and has good outcomes.

Current and Evolving Indications for Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation

This review will discuss the etiologies of kidney disease in liver transplant candidates, provide a historical background of the prior evolution of simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplant indications, discuss the current indications for SLK including Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network policies and Model for End Stage Liver Disease exception points, as well as provide an overview of the safety net kidney transplant policy. Finally, the authors explore unanswered questions and future research needed in SLK transplantation.

Overcoming Mismatch Concerns for Adult Recipients of Small Pediatric Deceased Donor Kidneys

BACKGROUND

Kidneys from very young pediatric donors continue to be underutilized. To reduce discard, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy was recently updated to allow kidneys from donors weighing <18 kg to be recovered en bloc.

METHODS

We reviewed our center's experience with kidney transplantation in adult recipients of <18 kg pediatric donor kidneys to assess renal function outcomes specific to solitary vs en bloc usage.

RESULTS

The majority of <18 kg donors were used en bloc (n = 39, 72.2% vs n = 15, 27.8%). Donor weight (kg) was similar between the 2 groups (12.3 ± 3.2 vs 14.1 ± 2.5, P = .05). Recipient weight was lower in the solitary kidney group (P = .01). Both groups had a similar donor-to-recipient body weight ratio (0.24 ± 0.3 vs 0.18 ± 0.3, P = .51). The solitary kidney group had a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 (56.9 ± 24.3 vs 81.8 ± 24.8, P = .01) and 2 years (72 ± 18.6 vs 93.7 ± 21.6, P = .03). By 2 years, both groups had an average estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min. Kidney allograft growth occurred in both groups, with the largest increase occurring the first month posttransplant (11.9%, 18.6%, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

For pediatric donors weighing <18 kg, improvements in renal function continue beyond the first posttransplant year. Risk for hyperfiltration injury appears low and renal mass-recipient mass matching is useful in guiding decision-making for solitary vs en bloc utilization.

Detection of renal allograft fibrosis with MRI: arterial spin labeling outperforms reduced field-of-view IVIM

OBJECTIVE

To compare the value of reduced field-of-view (FOV) intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) for assessing renal allograft fibrosis and predicting long-term dysfunction.

METHODS

This prospective study included 175 renal transplant recipients undergoing reduced FOV IVIM DWI, ASL, and biopsies. Renal allograft fibrosis was categorized into ci0, ci1, ci2, and ci3 fibrosis according to biopsy results. A total of 83 participants followed for a median of 39 (IQR, 21-42) months were dichotomized into stable and impaired allograft function groups based on follow-up estimated glomerular filtration rate. Total apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_T), pure diffusion ADC, pseudo-perfusion ADC, perfusion fraction f from IVIM DWI, and renal blood flow (RBF) from ASL were calculated and compared. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the diagnostic and predictive performances.

RESULTS

RBF was different in ci0 vs ci1 (147.9 ± 46.3 vs 126.0 ± 49.4 ml/min/100 g, p = .02) and ci2 vs ci3 (92.9 ± 46.9 vs 70.8 ± 37.8 ml/min/100 g, p = .03). RBF in the stable group was higher than that in the impaired group (144.73 ± 49.33 vs 102.19 ± 47.58 ml/min/100 g, p < .001). AUCs in distinguishing renal allograft fibrosis and predicting long-term allograft dysfunction for RBF were higher than cortical ADC_T (ci0 vs ci1-3, 0.76 vs 0.59, p < .001; ci0-1 vs ci2-3, 0.79 vs 0.68, p = .01; ci0-2 vs ci3, 0.79 vs 0.68, p = .01; 0.76 vs 0.60, p = .04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Compared to reduced FOV IVIM DWI, ASL was a more promising technique for noninvasively distinguishing renal allograft fibrosis degree and predicting long-term allograft dysfunction.

KEY POINTS

• Compared to total ADC from rFOV IVIM DWI, RBF from ASL can distinguish no fibrosis (ci0) vs mild fibrosis (ci1) (p = .02) and moderate fibrosis (ci2) vs severe fibrosis (ci3) (p = .04). • RBF had superior performance than diffusion parameters in discriminating fibrosis (no fibrosis [ci0] vs fibrosis [ci1-3], mild fibrosis [ci0-1] vs moderate to severe fibrosis [ci2-3], non-severe [ci0-2] vs severe [ci3] fibrosis; AUC = 0.76 vs 0.59, p < .001; 0.79 vs 0.68, p = .01; 0.79 vs 0.68, p = .01). • Compared to reduced FOV IVIM DWI, ASL was a more promising technique for noninvasively predicting long-term allograft dysfunction (AUC = 0.76 vs 0.60, p = .04).

Kidney Allograft Fibrosis: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies

Interstitial fibrosis with tubule atrophy (IF/TA) is the response to virtually any sustained kidney injury and correlates inversely with kidney function and allograft survival. IF/TA is driven by various pathways that include hypoxia, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling, cellular rejection, inflammation and others. In this review we will focus on key pathways in the progress of renal fibrosis, diagnosis and therapy of allograft fibrosis. This review discusses the role and origin of myofibroblasts as matrix producing cells and therapeutic targets in renal fibrosis with a particular focus on renal allografts. We summarize current trends to use multi-omic approaches to identify new biomarkers for IF/TA detection and to predict allograft survival. Furthermore, we review current imaging strategies that might help to identify and follow-up IF/TA complementary or as alternative to invasive biopsies. We further discuss current clinical trials and therapeutic strategies to treat kidney fibrosis.Supplemental Visual Abstract; http://links.lww.com/TP/C141.

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: an updated perspective

Outcomes of both donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver and kidney transplants are improving. Experience in simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLK) using DCD donors, however, remains limited. In an updated cohort (2010-2018), outcomes of 30 DCD SLK and 131 donation after brain death (DBD) SLK from Mayo Clinic Arizona and Mayo Clinic Minnesota were reviewed. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was lower in the DCD SLK group (23 vs 29, P = .01). Kidney delayed graft function (DGF) rates were similar between the 2 groups (P = .11), although the duration of DGF was longer for DCD SLK recipients (20 vs 4 days, P = .01). Liver allograft (93.3% vs 93.1%, P = .29), kidney allograft (93.3% vs 93.1%, P = .91), and patient (96.7% vs 95.4%, P = .70) 1-year survival rates were similar. At 1 year, there were no differences in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (57.7 ± 18.2 vs 56.3 ± 17.7, P = .75) or progression of fibrosis (ci) on protocol kidney biopsy (P = .67). A higher incidence of biliary complications was observed in the DCD SLK group, with ischemic cholangiopathy being the most common (10.0% vs 0.0%, P = .03). The majority of biliary complications resolved with endoscopic management. With appropriate selection, DCD SLK recipients can have results equivalent to those of DBD SLK recipients.

Transplanting kidneys from donation after cardiac death donors with acute kidney injury

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) donors have historically been considered independent risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF), allograft failure, and inferior outcomes. With growing experience, updated analyses have shown good outcomes. There continues to be limited data, however, on outcomes specific to DCD donors who have AKI. Primary outcomes for this study were post-kidney transplant patient and allograft survival comparing two donor groups: DCD AKIN stage 2-3 and DBD AKIN stage 2-3. In comparing these groups, there were no short- or long-term differences in patient (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-1.93, P = .83) or allograft survival (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.64-2.97, P = .32). In multivariate models, the DCD/DBD status had no significant impact on the estimated GFR (eGFR) at 1 (P = .38), 2 (P = .60), and 3 years (P = .52). DGF (57.9% vs 67.9%, P = .09), rejection (12.1% vs 13.9%, P = .12), and progression of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) on protocol biopsy (P = .16) were similar between the two groups. With careful selection, good outcomes can be achieved utilizing severe AKI DCD kidneys. Historic concerns regarding primary nonfunction, DGF resulting in interstitial fibrosis and rejection, and inferior outcomes were not observed. Given the ongoing organ shortage, increased effort should be undertaken to further utilize these donors.

Should we use kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury for renal transplantation?

The scarcity of donor organs for transplant results in long waiting times for kidney transplantation and low transplant rate worldwide. Utilization of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the strategies that has attracted attention recently. This article reviewed the outcomes of transplanted renal allografts from donors with acute kidney injury. Key findings about the transplant outcomes included a higher incidence of delayed graft function and primary non function, but respectable outcomes in the context of similar acute rejection rates, and graft function and graft survival. Against this background and with evidence of high mortality for patients remaining on waiting list of transplant, we advocate consideration of AKI donors for kidney transplantation.

Proteins in Preservation Fluid as Predictors of Delayed Graft Function in Kidneys from Donors after Circulatory Death

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for ESRD, and donor kidney shortage urges proper donor-recipient matching. Zero-hour biopsies provide predictive values for short- and long-term transplantation outcomes, but are invasive and may not reflect the entire organ. Alternative, more representative methods to predict transplantation outcome are required. We hypothesized that proteins accumulating in preservation fluid during cold ischemic storage can serve as biomarkers to predict post-transplantation graft function.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Levels of 158 proteins were measured in preservation fluids from kidneys donated after circulatory death (Maastricht category III) collected in two Dutch centers (University Medical Center Utrecht and Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam) between 2013 and 2015. Five candidate biomarkers identified in a discovery set of eight kidneys with immediate function (IF) versus eight with delayed graft function (DGF) were subsequently analyzed in a verification set of 40 additional preservation fluids to establish a prediction model.

RESULTS

Variables tested for their contribution to a prediction model included five proteins (leptin, periostin, GM-CSF, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and osteopontin) and two clinical parameters (recipient body mass index [BMI] and dialysis duration) that distinguished between IF and DGF in the discovery set. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression provided a prediction model on the basis of leptin and GM-CSF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87, and addition of recipient BMI generated a model with an AUC of 0.89, outperforming the Kidney Donor Risk Index and the DGF risk calculator, showing AUCs of 0.55 and 0.59, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that donor kidney preservation fluid harbors biomarkers that, together with information on recipient BMI, predict short-term post-transplantation kidney function. Our approach is safe, easy, and performs better than current prediction algorithms, which are only on the basis of clinical parameters.