B-type natriuretic peptides strongly predict mortality in patients who are treated with long-term dialysis

Brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide in kidney transplantation: More than just cardiac markers

Although kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment option for most patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) due to reduced mortality, morbidity and increased quality of life, long- term complications such as chronic kidney allograft dysfunction (CKAD) and increased cardiovascular disease burden are still major challenges. Thus, routine screening of KT recipients (KTRs) is very important to identify and quantify risks and guide preventative measures. However, no screening parameter has perfect sensitivity and specificity, and there is unmet need for new markers. In this review, we evaluate brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as promising markers for risk stratification in the kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The usefulness of these markers are already proven in heart failure, hypertension, coronary artery disease. In the context of KT, evidence is emerging. BNP and NT-proBNP has shown to be associated with kidney function, graft failure, echocardiographic parameters, major cardiovascular events and mortality but the underlying mechanisms are not known. Although BNP and NT-proBNP interact with immune system, renin angiotensin system and sympathetic system; it is not known whether these interactions are responsible for the clinical findings observed in KTRs. Future studies are needed whether these biomarkers show clinical efficacy, especially with regard to hard outcomes such as major adverse cardiovascular events and graft dysfunction and whether routine implementation of these markers are cost effective in KTRs.

NT-proBNP as predictor of major cardiac events after renal transplantation in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

For the improvement of outcome after renal transplantation it is important to predict future risk of major adverse cardiac events as well as all-cause mortality. We aimed to determine the relationship of pre-transplant NT-proBNP with major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality after transplant in patients on the waiting-list with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 176 patients with end-stage renal disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who received a kidney transplant. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation [STEMI] or non-ST-segment elevation [NSTEMI]), stroke or transient ischemic attack), coronary artery disease requiring intervention or bypass or death from cardiovascular causes.

RESULTS

MACE occurred in 28/176 patients. Patients with NT-proBNP levels above 4350 pg/ml had 1- and 5-year survival rates of 90.67% and 68.20%, whereas patients with NT-proBNP levels below 4350 pg/ml had 1- and 5-year survival rates of 100% and 90.48% (p < 0.01). 1- and 5-year MACE-free survival rates were calculated as 78.82% and 74.68% for patients with NT-proBNP > 4350 pg/ml and 93.33% and 91.21% for patients with NT-proBNP < 4350 pg/ml (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-transplant NT-proBNP might identify renal transplant candidates at risk for MACE after transplant.

Do Natriuretic Peptide Measurements Provide Insights into Management of End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Undergoing Dialysis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Impaired renal function may affect natriuretic peptide levels through a variety of factors and mechanisms, such as high prevalence of concomitant vascular and myocardial diseases, reduced clearance, increased risk of volume overload, and different types and solute removal techniques in the setting of dialysis. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence suggests that natriuretic peptide testing may provide insights into management of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) on dialysis, as they have been shown to be independently associated with morbidity and mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rising natriuretic peptide levels over time may identify CKD patients more likely to approach ESRD and requiring dialysis initiation. Moreover, serial natriuretic peptide measurements may also be helpful in guiding fluid management in ESRD patients on dialysis. However, since patients with CKD usually have significantly higher and more variable baseline levels of natriuretic peptides than those without CKD, traditional cut-off values may not be applicable, and individualized trajectories should be applied and interpreted in the clinical context. Routine clinical use natriuretic peptide testing in the CKD and ESRD settings still needs to be refined and individualized, yet their diagnostic and prognostic values can provide valuable insights into clinical trajectories and potential treatment responses.

[Natriuretic peptides in dialysis: From theory to clinical practice]

Cardiologists and emergency-wards physicians are used to check natriuretic peptides serum level, mainly B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro-Brain natriuretic peptide for acute cardiac failure diagnosis. Due to their accumulation in chronic kidney disease and their elimination by dialysis, natriuretic peptides sampling remains debatable in chronic kidney disease patients. In dialysis patients, high natriuretic peptides values are associated with mortality, left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiac failure. However, a single value cannot provide a reliable diagnosis. Our clinical practice is as follows: First, we prefer B-type natriuretic peptide to N-terminal pro-Brain natriuretic peptide because of its shorter half-life, with less impact of renal function and dialysis, making its interpretation easier in case of advanced chronic kidney disease or in dialysis patients; second, we define a reference value of B-type natriuretic peptide at dry weight from serial measurements; third, the B-type natriuretic peptide changes are interpreted according to extracellular fluid and cardiac status, but also from the arteriovenous fistula blood flow. In stable dialysis patients, B-type natriuretic peptide is sampled monthly and weekly in unstable patients. We illustrate our experience using clinical cases of overhydration, new cardiac disease onset, hypovolemia and arteriovenous fistula with high blood flow. Longitudinal follow-up of B-type natriuretic peptide is an important advance in dialysis patients in order to detect and treat extracellular fluid variations and cardiac disease status early, both important factors associated with hard outcomes.

Association of NT-proBNP and BNP With Future Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ESKD: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Use of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) for cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) remains unclear. We examined the associations between different threshold elevations of these peptide levels and clinical outcomes in patients with ESKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (through September 2019) for observational studies of adults with ESKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate≤15mL/min/1.73m² or receiving maintenance dialysis).

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Studies that reported NT-proBNP or BNP levels and future CV events, CV mortality, or all-cause mortality.

DATA EXTRACTION

Cohort characteristics and measures of risk associated with study-specified peptide thresholds.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Hazard ratios (HRs) for clinical outcomes associated with different NT-proBNP and BNP ranges were categorized into common thresholds and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 61 studies for inclusion in our review (19,688 people). 49 provided sufficient detail for inclusion in meta-analysis. Pooled unadjusted HRs for CV mortality were progressively greater for greater thresholds of NT-proBNP, from 1.45 (95% CI, 0.91-2.32) for levels>2,000pg/mL to 5.95 (95% CI, 4.23-8.37) for levels>15,000pg/mL. Risk for all-cause mortality was significantly higher at all NT-proBNP thresholds ranging from> 1,000 to> 20,000pg/mL (HR range, 1.53-4.00). BNP levels>550pg/mL were associated with increased risk for CV mortality (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.49-4.33), while the risks for all-cause mortality were 2.04 (95% CI, 0.82-5.12) at BNP levels>100pg/mL and 2.97 (95% CI, 2.21-3.98) at BNP levels>550pg/mL. Adjusted analyses demonstrated similarly greater risks for CV and all-cause mortality with greater NT-proBNP concentrations.

LIMITATIONS

Incomplete outcome reporting and risk for outcome reporting bias. Estimation of risk for CV events for specific thresholds of both peptides were limited by poor precision.

CONCLUSIONS

ESKD-specific NT-proBNP and BNP level thresholds of elevation are associated with increased risk for CV and all-cause mortality. This information may help guide interpretation of NT-proBNP and BNP levels in patients with ESKD.

Relationships among pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, dry weight and natriuretic peptide in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography study

BACKGROUND

Although the evaluation of fluid status in hemodialysis (HD) patients is useful, relationship among pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), dry body weight (DW) and natriuretic peptide has not been elucidated. In addition, there has been no objective marker for instantaneously monitoring hemodynamic improvement in response to HD. We previously reported that PCWP and time constant of left ventricular pressure decline (Tau) can be noninvasively estimated (ePCWP and eTau) by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). The aim of this study was to elucidate the relationship among ePCWP, eTau, DW and natriuretic peptide in patients undergoing HD.

METHODS

We measured ePCWP and body weight (BW) by STE in 81 patients and ANP and BNP by blood examination in 31 patients just before and after HD during sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

The ePCWP decreased after HD, and this was associated with reductions in ln ANP, eTau and BW (r = 0.523, 0.271 and 0.814, respectively, p < 0.05). The % change in ePCWP was not correlated with the % change in ln BNP (p = 0.47). The change in ePCWP had a stronger correlation with the % change in BW than the change in any other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The ePCWP is more sensitive to estimate the change in BW during HD than any other parameters such as ANP and BNP. These results indicated that a substantial amount of excess fluid can be assessed real-time by STE using ePCWP.

Level of inflammatory factors in chronic hemodialysis patients with and without cardiovascular disease

Background:

Considering the existence of controversies about the predictive value of inflammatory markers for cardiovascular disease (CVD), we aimed to compare the level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and interlukin-6 (IL-6) level in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients with and without CVD.

Materials and Methods:

In this historical cohort study, HD patients with and without CVD disease were enrolled. The presence of CVD risk factors, level of inflammatory factors including IL-6 and hs-CRP as well as lipid levels, fasting blood sugar, and other biochemical factors were compared in two studied groups.

Results:

During the study, eighty HD patients with (n = 40) and without (n = 40) CVD were enrolled. Diabetes was more prevalent among HD patients with CVD than those without CVD (P < 0.05). The level of IL-6 and hs-CRP were not different in two studied groups (P > 0.05). Univariate analysis of variance test indicated that there was not any significant relationship between hs-CRP and CVD (P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

The findings indicated that the level of inflammatory factors including hs-CRP and IL-6 are not significantly different in HD patients with and without CVD. However, for obtaining more definite conclusion in this field and evaluation their predicting role in this field, it is recommended to study other novel inflammatory markers as well as the additive effect of the inflammatory factors with traditional ones in larger sample size and longer follow-up.

Effects of lowered dialysate sodium on left ventricle function and brain natriuretic peptide in maintenance of hemodialysis patients

Introduction:

Impaired diastolic flow is characterized by decreased left ventricular (LV) filling diastole, abnormal LV distensibility, or delayed relaxation. B-Type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is an indicator of various cardiovascular diseases and body volume status. The aim of this study was to determine whether the lowering of dialysate sodium (Na) levels is effective on LV systolic and diastolic parameters and BNP in the maintenance of hemodialysis patients.

Materials and Methods:

The study included 49 chronic hemodialysis patients. Left atrium (LA) diameter and LV ejection fraction, LV systolic and diastolic diameter, deceleration time (DT), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD), early diastolic transmitral flow ( E) and late diastolic transmitral flow ( A) velocities, E/ A ratio, isovolumic relaxation time, peak early diastolic velocity ( E′), late diastolic velocity ( A′) of tissue Doppler mitral annulus, and flow propagation velocity of mitral inflow ( Vp) were measured before and 6 months after hemodialysis with low Na dialysate.

Results:

Six months after low Na hemodialysis, a decrease was observed in echocardiographic parameters such as PAP and IVCD ( p < 0.05, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). However, a significant difference was not observed in LA diameter. In LV diastolic measurement of E and A waves, E/ A ratio, DT, Vp, septal E′ and A′, and lateral E′ and A′ exhibited significant improvement by low Na HD. BNP level was significantly reduced ( p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Lowered dialysate Na concentration improves PAP, IVCD, and LV diastolic properties assessed by mitral inflow filling, tissue Doppler velocity, and mitral inflow velocity propagation.

Diagnostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide for estimating left atrial size and its usefulness for predicting all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events among chronic haemodialysis patients

AIM

Estimating fluid balance in haemodialysis patients is essential when determining dry weight, but limited methods are currently available. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a useful surrogate marker in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), but whether its validity could be generalized to haemodialysis patients has not been studied well.

METHODS

A total of 457 haemodialysis patients at a dialysis centre were analyzed. Determinants of BNP were assessed in connection with ultrasound cardiography (UCG) records, Kt/V, ultrafiltration rate (UFR), and demographic factors. All-cause death and cardiovascular (CV) events were recorded as the main outcome.

RESULTS

Among the UCG records, left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were determinants of log-transformed (ln) BNP; UFR, age and sex were also significant. There was a positive correlation between BNP and LAD (r = 0.285, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that BNP had 90% and 80% sensitivity to predict the presence of LA enlargement of 77.9 pg/mL and 133.2 pg/mL, respectively. Higher BNP and lower LVEF were associated with higher risk for developing all-cause death and CVD. In the adjusted model, patients with BNP higher than 471 pg/mL had hazard ratio of 2.18 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-3.96, P = 0.01), compared to those with BNP <109 pg/mL.

CONCLUSION

B-type natriuretic peptide was determined by LAD, LVEF, UFR, age and sex. BNP and LAD had positive correlation and BNP could become a useful tool for estimating the presence of LA enlargement. BNP and LVEF was a strong risk factor for predicting all-cause death and CV events among patients undergoing haemodialysis.

Sex steroids levels in chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant recipients: associations with disease severity and prediction of mortality

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to characterize and evaluate prognostic implications of circulating sex steroids in patients at different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

PATIENTS

We prospectively recruited patients with CKD III-IV, undergoing chronic dialysis and kidney transplant recipients (KTR) from a single centre in 2003-2004.

MEASUREMENTS

Two stored samples taken 3 months apart were analysed for sex hormones using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry, and the mean of the two was used for analysis. We also measured novel biomarkers troponin T and NT-proBNP. Patients were followed until death, transplant or 30 June 2013, and survival analysis performed.

RESULTS

In males, but not in females, both testosterone (P = 0·003) as well as oestradiol (P < 0·02) levels were lowest in dialysis patients and highest in KTR. Over a median follow up of 8·5 years (interquartile range 3·8-9·2), 52 men (36%) died and 24 (17%) received a kidney transplant. In Cox proportional hazards regression up to 9·6 years, an increase in total testosterone of 1 nmol/l was associated with a 9·8% (95% confidence interval 3·1-16·3) decrease in mortality independent of age, body mass index, stage of renal disease and circulating levels of NT-proBNP or troponin T. By contrast, sex steroid levels were not associated with mortality in females.

CONCLUSIONS

Testosterone levels differ across stages of kidney disease and low testosterone levels predict mortality in males, independent of established and novel predictors of mortality.

Temporal trajectory of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4, dialysis, and kidney transplant

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration predicts outcome in patients undergoing dialysis. Because survival and cardiovascular risk change across the CKD continuum, serial changes in BNP were compared in patients at different CKD stages and after kidney transplantation.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Patients with CKD stages 3 and 4 (CKD 3-4), dialysis patients, and kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from one center had two measurements of BNP taken a median of 161 days apart in 2003-2004 and were followed until July 2012. Both BNP-32 (Triage BNP; Biosite Diagnostics) and NT-BNP-76 (proBNP; Roche Diagnostics) were assayed. The interaction between change in log-transformed BNP concentration over time and patient group was tested by fitting regression models on panel data with random effects. Survival after the second measurement was compared by tertile of change in BNP.

RESULTS

Patients with CKD 3-4 (n=48), dialysis patients (n=102), and KTRs (n=73) were followed for a median of 5.7, 4.8, and 5.9 years, respectively. The interaction between patient group and BNP measurements over time was significant for NT-BNP-76 (P<0.001) and BNP-32 (P<0.01). Median NT-BNP-76 increased in dialysis patients and those with CKD 3-4 from 3850 pg/ml (interquartile range [IQR], 1776-12,323 pg/ml) to 18,830 pg/ml (IQR, 6114-61,009 pg/ml; P<0.001) and from 698 pg/ml (IQR, 283-2922 pg/ml) to 2529 pg/ml (IQR, 347-9277 pg/ml; P=0.002), respectively. Change was not significant for KTRs or comparisons made with BNP-32. Survival rate was significantly lower for patients with the highest tertile of change in NT-BNP-76 among patients with CKD 3-4 (P=0.02), but not in the dialysis or KTR groups. In 11 patients who received a kidney transplant during the study, median NT-BNP-76 decreased from 9607 pg/ml (IQR, 2292-31,282 pg/ml) to 457 pg/ml (IQR, 203-863 pg/ml) after transplant (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The temporal trajectory of BNP differs between dialysis patients and those with CKD 3-4 and KTRs. This has important implications for the development of BNP-guided management strategies in CKD.

Are levels of NT-proBNP and SDMA useful to determine diastolic dysfunction in chronic kidney disease and renal transplant patients?

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to determine the clinical usefulness of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) for detection of renal and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and renal transplant (RT) recipients.

METHODS

We included 98 CKD and 44 RT patients. We assessed LV function using pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound. Diastolic dysfunction was defined when the E:A ratio was <1.

RESULTS

Independent predictors of NT-proBNP levels were age, creatinine, and albumin in CKD patients and age and urea in RT patients. Determinants of SDMA in CKD patients were glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and NT-proBNP and creatinine in RT patients. In RT patients with diastolic dysfunction, NT-proBNP and SDMA were significantly higher than in patients without diastolic dysfunction (F = 7.478, P < 0.011; F = 2.631, P < 0.017). After adjustment for GFR, the differences were not seen. In CKD patients adjusted NT-proBNP and SDMA values for GFR were not significantly higher in patients with diastolic dysfunction than in patients without diastolic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

NT-proBNP is useful for detection of LV diastolic dysfunction in RT recipients. When evaluating both NT-proBNP and SDMA it is necessary to consider GFR as a confounding factor.

B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis of end-stage renal disease: a meta-analysis

Background

The prognostic importance of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro BNP (NT-proBNP) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains controversial.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We conducted an unrestricted search from the MEDLINE and EMBASE in all languages that were published between 1966 and Augest2013. Twenty-seven long-term prospective studies met our inclusion criterias. From the pooled analysis, elevated BNP/NT-proBNP was significantly associated with increased all cause mortality [odds ratio (OR), 3.85; 95% CI, 3.11 to 4.75], cardiovascular mortality (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 2.53 to 6.84), and cardiovascular events (OR, 7.02; 95% CI, 2.21 to 22.33). The funnel plot showed no evidence of publication bias. The corresponding pooled positive and negative likelihood ratio for prediction of all cause mortality were 1.86 (95% CI, 1.66 to 2.08) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.55), respectively.

Conclusions/Significance

BNP/NT-proBNP is a promising prognostic tool to risk-stratify the patients with ESRD. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the specific pathogenic mechanisms and the impact of other potential prognostic factors.

Incidence of arteriovenous fistula closure due to high-output cardiac failure in kidney-transplanted patients

BACKGROUND

Some hemodialysis patients develop arteriovenous (AV) fistulas with high flows. This volume overload can result in high-output cardiac failure. To date, predisposing access flow rates are unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all kidney-transplant recipients at the Medical University of Innsbruck (MUI) from 2005 to 2010 included 797 patients with the following criteria: previous hemodialysis with a native AV fistula or a graft, sufficient function of the kidney transplant up to the time of the data analysis, and follow-up care at the MUI.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of the 113 patients (25.7%) needed an AV fistula closure, mostly because of symptoms of cardiac failure. The mean shunt flow in the intervention group was 2197.2 mL/min, whereas the mean shunt flow in the non-intervention group was only 850.9 mL/min. Shunt closures were most frequently made in patients with upper-arm shunts (41.7%).

CONCLUSION

The necessity of shunt closure is not a rarity. Patients who underwent an AV fistula ligature had high access flows with about 2200 mL/min. As the symptoms of cardiac failure greatly improved after shunt closure, patients with high access flow may benefit from such an intervention.

Rationale and design of the Sodium Lowering In Dialysate (SoLID) trial: a randomised controlled trial of low versus standard dialysate sodium concentration during hemodialysis for regression of left ventricular mass

BACKGROUND

The current literature recognises that left ventricular hypertrophy makes a key contribution to the high rate of premature cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients. Determining how we might intervene to ameliorate left ventricular hypertrophy in dialysis populations has become a research priority. Reducing sodium exposure through lower dialysate sodium may be a promising intervention in this regard. However there is clinical equipoise around this intervention because the benefit has not yet been demonstrated in a robust prospective clinical trial, and several observational studies have suggested sodium lowering interventions may be deleterious in some dialysis patients.

METHODS/DESIGN

The Sodium Lowering in Dialysate (SoLID) study is funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand. It is a multi-centre, prospective, randomised, single-blind (outcomes assessor), controlled parallel assignment 3-year clinical trial. The SoLID study is designed to study what impact low dialysate sodium has upon cardiovascular risk in dialysis patients. The study intends to enrol 118 home hemodialysis patients from 6 sites in New Zealand over 24 months and follow up each participant over 12 months. Key exclusion criteria are: patients who dialyse more frequently than 3.5 times per week, pre-dialysis serum sodium of <135 mM, and maintenance hemodiafiltration. In addition, some medical conditions, treatments or participation in other dialysis trials, which contraindicate the SoLID study intervention or confound its effects, will be exclusion criteria. The intervention and control groups will be dialysed using dialysate sodium 135 mM and 140 mM respectively, for 12 months. The primary outcome measure is left ventricular mass index, as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, after 12 months of intervention. Eleven or more secondary outcomes will be studied in an attempt to better understand the physiologic and clinical mechanisms by which lower dialysate sodium alters the primary end point.

DISCUSSION

The SoLID study is designed to clarify the effect of low dialysate sodium upon the cardiovascular outcomes of dialysis patients. The study results will provide much needed information about the efficacy of a cost effective, economically sustainable solution to a condition which is curtailing the lives of so many dialysis patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number: ACTRN12611000975998.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 activity in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a novel regulator of the renin–angiotensin system that counteracts the adverse effects of angiotensin II. In heart failure patients, elevated plasma ACE2 activity predicted adverse events and greater myocardial dysfunction. We aimed to describe plasma ACE2 activity and its clinical associations in patients with kidney disease.

Methods

Patients recruited from a single centre comprised of chronic kidney disease Stage III/IV (CKD), haemodialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Plasma ACE2 enzyme activity was measured using a fluorescent substrate assay in plasma, collected at baseline and stored at −80°C. Linear regression was performed in both males and females separately to determine the covariates associated with log-transformed ACE2.

Results

The median (interquartile range) plasma ACE2 activity in pmol/mL/min was 15.9 (8.4–26.1) in CKD (n = 59), 9.2 (3.9–18.2) in haemodialysis (n = 100) and 13.1 (5.7–21.9) in KTR (n = 80; P < 0.01). In male haemodialysis patients, ACE2 activity was 12.1 (6.8–19.6) compared with 4.4 (2.5–10.3) in females (P < 0.01). Log-transformed ACE2 plasma activity was associated with post-haemodialysis systolic blood pressure in females [β-coefficient 0.04, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.01–0.06, P = 0.006]. In males, log-transformed ACE2 plasma activity was associated with B-type natriuretic peptide (β-coefficient 0.39, 95% CI 0.19–0.60, P < 0.001). Plasma ACE2 activity was not associated with mortality.

Conclusions

Plasma ACE2 activity is reduced in haemodialysis patients compared with CKD patients, and in female haemodialysis patients compared with male. The different associations of plasma ACE2 activity between male and female haemodialysis patients indicate that the role of ACE2 in cardiovascular disease may differ by gender.

Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level predicts kidney prognosis in patients with predialysis chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

As a cardiorenal syndrome, there is a dynamic interplay between the heart and the kidney. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the prognostic impact of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, a cardiac biomarker, on the long-term kidney prognosis in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 508 patients with CKD Stages 3, 4 and 5 not on dialysis, from a single nephrology department between 2004 and 2010. The exclusion criteria were over 90 years of age, malignancy, active infection, low cardiac ejection fraction and rapid progressive glomerulonephritis. Relationships between BNP and kidney end point [defined as doubling of baseline serum creatinine and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring kidney replacement therapy] were measured using Cox models for case-mix and laboratory variables.

RESULTS

The final analysis covered 485 participants with no loss to follow-up. The median follow-up period was 3.2 years. Two hundred and twenty-eight of the 485 patients reached ESKD requiring dialysis, and baseline serum creatinine levels doubled in another 31. The kidney end point was significantly poorer among patients with plasma BNP levels above, compared with below a cut-off value of 86.1 pg/mL indicated from receiver operating characteristic analysis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified the common logarithm BNP as a predictor of kidney end point (adjusted hazard ratio 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28-2.46, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevation of BNP level is associated with an increased risk for accelerated progression of CKD ultimately to ESKD. Monitoring the BNP level could be helpful in the management of combined heart and kidney disease.

Association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency with NT-pro BNP levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional analysis

Background

Nutritional vitamin D deficiency is an emerging risk factor for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure. The association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), a robust prognostic marker for post-AMI mortality and heart failure, is unknown and could illuminate a potential pathway for adverse outcomes among post-AMI patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency.

Methods

In a cross-sectional analysis, we studied 238 AMI patients from 21 U.S. centers to test the association of nutritional vitamin D (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]) deficiency with NT-proBNP levels. Levels of 25(OH)D levels were categorized as normal (≥30 ng/mL), insufficient (>20 - <30 ng/mL), deficient (>10 - ≤20 ng/mL), or severely deficient (≤10 ng/mL).

Results

Low 25(OH)D levels were found in 95.7% of AMI patients. No significant trends for higher mean baseline log NT-proBNP levels in severely deficient (6.9 ± 1.3 pg/mL), deficient (6.9 ± 1.2 pg/mL), and insufficient (6.9 ± 0.9 pg/ml) groups were observed as compared with patients having normal (6.1 ± 1.7 pg/mL) levels, P = 0.17. Findings were similar in the subset of patients who had follow-up NT-proBNP levels drawn at one month. In multivariate regression modeling, after adjusting for multiple covariates, 25(OH)D was not associated with NT-proBNP.

Conclusions

Potential associations between nutritional vitamin D deficiency and prognosis in the setting of AMI are unlikely to be mediated through NT-proBNP pathways. Future studies should examine other mechanisms, such as inflammation and vascular calcification, by which 25(OH)D deficiency could mediate adverse outcomes post-AMI.

Brain natriuretic peptide between traditional and nontraditional risk factors in hemodialysis patients: analysis of cardiovascular mortality in a two-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The ability of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) together with other traditional and nontraditional risk factors to predict cardiovascular (CV) mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients has not been well established. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the predictive cutoff values of baseline measurement of BNP along with the known CV disease risk factors to predict all-cause and CV mortality in HD patients.

METHODS

BNP concentration before HD was measured in 125 prevalent HD patients (age 53.0 ± 13.5 years, HD vintage 75.2 ± 61.0 months). In addition, several traditional CV risk factors (blood pressure, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, left ventricular hypertrophy) and uremia/dialysis-related CV risk factors (anemia, calcium and phosphate impairment, malnutrition, inflammation, ultrafiltration, HD duration, Kt/V) were examined.

RESULTS

During the 2-year follow-up, we lost 28 out of 125 patients (22.5%), with CV disease (65.7%) being the main cause of mortality. The cutoff point for BNP, as predictor of the clinical outcome, according to the ROC curve was 1,194 pg/ml for CV mortality with sensitivity and specificity of 63 and 65%, respectively (AUC 0.61 and confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.47-0.75). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that all-cause (log-rank, p = 0.002) and CV mortality (log-rank, p = 0.001) were the cause of a significantly lower survival in patients with a mean BNP >1,200 pg/ml. The univariate Cox regression analysis found the following factors to be predictors of all-cause mortality: hemoglobin (<110 g/l), phosphorus (>1.78 mmol/l), albumin (<40 g/l), C-reactive protein (CRP ≥ 10 mg/l), BNP (>1,200 pg/ml) and cardiac ejection fraction (≤ 55%). The multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that only CRP ≥ 10 mg/l with a hazard ratio (HR) 6.82 (CI 95% 1.86-24.9, p = 0.004) and BNP >1,200 pg/ml with HR 5.79 (CI 95% 1.58-21.3, p = 0.004) were predictors of all-cause mortality. BNP >1,200 pg/ml with HR 13.52 (CI 95% 1.68-108.9, p = 0.014) was found to be an even stronger predictor of CV mortality than CRP ≥ 10 mg/l with HR 6.53 (CI 95% 1.35-31.6, p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study pointed out that BNP >1,200 pg/ml as a marker of cardiac dysfunction and CRP ≥ 10 mg/l as a marker of inflammation identify HD patients at increased risk of CV mortality.

Mechanisms of the cardiorenal syndromes

The kidney and heart have essential roles in maintaining blood volume homeostasis and in the regulation of systemic blood pressure. Acute or chronic dysfunction in either the heart or kidneys can induce dysfunction in the other organ, resulting in the so-called cardiorenal syndromes, which are classified into five different types. Abrupt worsening of cardiac function predisposes an individual to acute kidney injury from renal hypoperfusion or renal congestion. Progressive, sometimes permanent, chronic kidney impairment can result from chronic renal hypoperfusion or congestion. Heart failure is common in patients with acute kidney injury. Chronic kidney disease predisposes individuals to atherosclerotic, arteriosclerotic and cardiomyopathic disease. Finally, both cardiac and renal disease can also occur secondary to systemic conditions, such as diabetes or autoimmune disease. This Review examines the mechanisms presiding over the first four types of cardiorenal syndromes. These mechanisms provide a template that accounts for the heart-kidney interactions that occur in patients whose concomitant cardiac and renal conditions result from a third cause.

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and mortality in renal transplant recipients versus the general population

BACKGROUND

Mortality rates are higher in renal transplant recipients (RTR) than in the general population (GP). It is unknown what risk factors account for this difference.

METHODS

We prospectively followed a cohort of 606 RTR for 3026 person-years, during which 95 died. A GP cohort of 3234 subjects was followed for 24,940 person-years, during which 130 died.

RESULTS

All investigated risk factors, except ethnicity, body mass index, and total cholesterol, differed significantly between cohorts, with an adverse risk profile in the RTR. The age-adjusted and gender-adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in RTR was 6.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-8.3) compared with GP, which was reduced to 2.4 (95% CI 1.6-3.6), 4.3 (95% CI 3.0-6.1), and 5.0 (95% CI 3.5-7.3) after additional adjustment for differences in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), creatinine clearance, and need for antihypertensive medication, respectively (all P<0.001), whereas adjustment for variables more related to atherosclerosis, including history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, did not affect the difference in mortality between RTR and GP. Associations of NT-proBNP, creatinine clearance, and the use of antihypertensive medication with mortality were significantly steeper in RTR than in GP. Risk for mortality was similar for RTR and GP with low NT-proBNP (<100 pg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated NT-proBNP, low creatinine clearance, and need for antihypertensive medication are stronger risk factors for mortality in RTR than in GP. The increased mortality seen in the RTR population may well be related to cardiac failure rather than "accelerated atherosclerosis."