1
|
Reddy YNV, Kearney MD, Ward M, Burke RE, O'Hare AM, Reese PP, Lane-Fall MB. Identifying Major Barriers to Home Dialysis (The IM-HOME Study): Findings From a National Survey of Patients, Care Partners, and Providers. Am J Kidney Dis 2024:S0272-6386(24)00790-X. [PMID: 38851446 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Developing strategies to improve home dialysis use requires a comprehensive understanding of barriers. We sought to identify the most important barriers to home dialysis use from the perspective of patients, care partners, and providers. STUDY DESIGN This is a convergent parallel mixed-methods study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS We convened a 7-member advisory board of patients, care partners, and providers who collectively developed lists of major patient/care partner-perceived barriers and provider-perceived barriers to home dialysis. We used these lists to develop a survey that was distributed to patients, care partners, and providers-through the American Association of Kidney Patients and the National Kidney Foundation. The surveys asked participants to (1) rank their top 3 major barriers (quantitative) and (2) describe barriers to home dialysis (qualitative). ANALYTICAL APPROACH We compiled a list of the top 3 patient/care partner-perceived and top 3 provider-perceived barriers (quantitative). We also conducted a directed content analysis of open-ended survey responses (qualitative). RESULTS There were 522 complete responses (233 providers; 289 patients/care partners). The top 3 patient/care partner-perceived barriers were fear of performing home dialysis; lack of space; and the need for home-based support. The top 3 provider-perceived barriers were poor patient education; limited mechanisms for home-based support staff, mental health, and education; and lack of experienced staff. We identified 9 themes through qualitative analysis: limited education; financial disincentives; limited resources; high burden of care; built environment/structure of care delivery that favors in-center hemodialysis; fear and isolation; perceptions of inequities in access to home dialysis; provider perspectives about patients; and patient/provider resiliency. LIMITATIONS This was an online survey that is subject to nonresponse bias. CONCLUSIONS The top 3 barriers to home dialysis for patient/care partners and providers incompletely overlap, suggesting the need for diverse strategies that simultaneously address patient-perceived barriers at home and provider-perceived barriers in the clinic. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY There are many barriers to home dialysis use in the United States. However, we know little about which barriers are the most important to patients and clinicians. This makes it challenging to develop strategies to increase home dialysis use. In this study, we surveyed patients, care partners, and clinicians across the country to identify the most important barriers to home dialysis, namely (1) patients/care partners identified fear of home dialysis, lack of space, and lack of home-based support; and (2) clinicians identified poor patient education, limited support for staff and patients, and lack of experienced staff. These findings suggest that patients and clinicians perceive different barriers and that both sets of barriers should be addressed to expand home dialysis use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuvaram N V Reddy
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Matthew D Kearney
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Mixed Methods Research Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michaela Ward
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Mixed Methods Research Lab, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert E Burke
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Division of Hospital Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ann M O'Hare
- Health Services Research & Development Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Seattle, Washington; Hospital and Specialty Medicine and Geriatrics and Extended Care Services, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Peter P Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Meghan B Lane-Fall
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Desbiens LC, Bargman JM, Chan CT, Nadeau-Fredette AC. Integrated home dialysis model: facilitating home-to-home transition. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:i21-i33. [PMID: 38846416 PMCID: PMC11151120 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) are the two home dialysis modalities offered to patients. They promote patient autonomy, enhance independence, and are generally associated with better quality of life compared to facility hemodialysis. PD offers some advantages (enhanced flexibility, ability to travel, preservation of residual kidney function, and vascular access sites) but few patients remain on PD indefinitely due to peritonitis and other complications. By contrast, HHD incurs longer and more intensive training combined with increased upfront health costs compared to PD, but is easier to sustain in the long term. As a result, the integrated home dialysis model was proposed to combine the advantages of both home-based dialysis modalities. In this paradigm, patients are encouraged to initiate dialysis on PD and transfer to HHD after PD termination. Available evidence demonstrates the feasibility and safety of this approach and some observational studies have shown that patients who undergo the PD-to-HHD transition have clinical outcomes comparable to patients who initiate dialysis directly on HHD. Nevertheless, the prevalence of PD-to-HHD transfers remains low, reflecting the multiple barriers that prevent the full uptake of home-to-home transitions, notably a lack of awareness about the model, home-care "burnout," clinical inertia after a transfer to facility HD, suboptimal integration of PD and HHD centers, and insufficient funding for home dialysis programs. In this review, we will examine the conceptual advantages and disadvantages of integrated home dialysis, present the evidence that underlies it, identify challenges that prevent its success and finally, propose solutions to increase its adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis-Charles Desbiens
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Canada
| | - Joanne M Bargman
- Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christopher T Chan
- Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wong SN, Turnbull L, Saunders S, Er L, Bevilacqua MU, Levin A, Singh RS. Evaluation and outcomes of a 5-year assisted peritoneal dialysis program. Perit Dial Int 2024; 44:177-184. [PMID: 36749175 DOI: 10.1177/08968608221149546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2016, Peritoneal Dialysis Assist (PDA) was implemented in British Columbia, Canada, as a pilot program to allow patients with physical, cognitive and social impairments to access an independent dialysis modality. This is a presentation of the usage and 5-year clinical outcomes of our provincial assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD) program. METHODS Patients who utilised long-term or respite PDA services in British Columbia, Canada, from 2016 to 2021 were included in this program evaluation. Incident and prevalent patient numbers were characterised annually as well as indications for PDA and patient demographics both annually and over time. Outcomes of interest included death, transfer to haemodialysis, transplantation and cessation of the PDA program but retention on PD. RESULTS Three hundred twenty-two total patients received services through the PDA program. The percentage of PD patients supported by long-term PDA service has grown to 11.2% in the most recent year. Patients spend a median of 13.6 (95% CI: 11.0, 16.1) months on long-term PDA, prolonging overall patient duration on PD by a little over a year. Of the patients who exited the long-term PDA program, 73 (37.4%) were able to utilise the service until they died. CONCLUSION PDA is an accessible, patient-centric service with clear and standardised referral criteria. Through the implementation of a local PDA program, patients have accessed PD and may have extended their PD life span, through avoidance of in-centre haemodialysis, by over 13 months during this 5-year study period. A significant proportion of patients on long-term PDA were able to use their preferred kidney replacement modality at home until they reached end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon N Wong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Linda Turnbull
- British Columbia Provincial Renal Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Lee Er
- British Columbia Provincial Renal Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Micheli U Bevilacqua
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- British Columbia Provincial Renal Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Adeera Levin
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- British Columbia Provincial Renal Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rajinder S Singh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reyskens M, Abrahams AC, François K, van Eck van der Sluijs A. Assisted peritoneal dialysis in Europe: a strategy to increase and maintain home dialysis. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:i34-i43. [PMID: 38846415 PMCID: PMC11151117 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a form of kidney replacement therapy with the major advantage that it can be performed at home. This has a positive impact on patients' autonomy and quality of life. However, the dialysis population is ageing and physical and/or cognitive impairments are common. These limitations often form a barrier to PD and contribute to the low incidence and prevalence of PD in Europe. Assisted PD can be a solution to this problem. Assisted PD refers to a patient being assisted by a person or device in performing all or part of their dialysis-related tasks, thereby making PD more accessible to elderly but also younger frail patients. In this way, offering an assisted PD program can help lower the threshold for initiating PD. In this review, we provide an overview of the epidemiology of assisted PD in Europe, we discuss the different categories and clinical outcomes of assisted PD, and we present how assisted PD can be implemented in clinical practice as a possible strategy to increase and maintain home dialysis in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot Reyskens
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alferso C Abrahams
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karlien François
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Teitelbaum I, Finkelstein FO. Why are we Not Getting More Patients onto Peritoneal Dialysis? Observations From the United States with Global Implications. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:1917-1923. [PMID: 37849989 PMCID: PMC10577320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers lifestyle advantages over in-center hemodialysis (HD) and is less costly. However, in the United States, less than 12% of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are maintained on this modality. In this brief review, we discuss some of the factors underlying the low prevalence of PD. These include inadequate patient education, a shortage of sufficiently well-trained medical and nursing personnel, absence of infrastructure to support urgent start PD, and lack of support for assisted PD, among other factors. Understanding and addressing these various issues may help increase the prevalence of PD in the United States and globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Teitelbaum
- Division of Kidney Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Torreggiani M, Piccoli GB, Moio MR, Conte F, Magagnoli L, Ciceri P, Cozzolino M. Choice of the Dialysis Modality: Practical Considerations. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12093328. [PMID: 37176768 PMCID: PMC10179541 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease and the need for kidney replacement therapy have increased dramatically in recent decades. Forecasts for the coming years predict an even greater increase, especially in low- and middle-income countries, due to the rise in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases and the aging population. Access to kidney replacement treatments may not be available to all patients, making it especially strategic to set up therapy programs that can ensure the best possible treatment for the greatest number of patients. The choice of the "ideal" kidney replacement therapy often conflicts with medical availability and the patient's tolerance. This paper discusses the pros and cons of various kidney replacement therapy options and their real-world applicability limits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Torreggiani
- Néphrologie et Dialyse, Centre Hospitalier Le Mans, 194 Avenue Rubillard, 72037 Le Mans, France
| | | | - Maria Rita Moio
- Néphrologie et Dialyse, Centre Hospitalier Le Mans, 194 Avenue Rubillard, 72037 Le Mans, France
| | - Ferruccio Conte
- Renal Division, Department of Health Sciences, Uiniversity of Milan, San Paolo Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza Magagnoli
- Renal Division, Department of Health Sciences, Uiniversity of Milan, San Paolo Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Ciceri
- Renal Division, Department of Health Sciences, Uiniversity of Milan, San Paolo Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Cozzolino
- Renal Division, Department of Health Sciences, Uiniversity of Milan, San Paolo Hospital, 20142 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fraga Dias B, Rodrigues A. Managing Transition between dialysis modalities: a call for Integrated care In Dialysis Units. BULLETIN DE LA DIALYSE À DOMICILE 2022. [DOI: 10.25796/bdd.v4i4.69113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Summary
Patients with chronic kidney disease have three main possible groups of dialysis techniques: in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and home hemodialysis. Home dialysis techniques have been associated with clinical outcomes that are equivalent and sometimes superior to those of in-center hemodialysisTransitions between treatment modalities are crucial moments. Transition periods are known as periods of disruption in the patient’s life associated with major complications, greater vulnerability, greater mortality, and direct implications for quality of life. Currently, it is imperative to offer a personalized treatment adapted to the patient and adjusted over time.An integrated treatment unit with all dialysis treatments and a multidisciplinary team can improve results by establishing a life plan, promoting health education, medical and psychosocial stabilization, and the reinforcement of health self-care. These units will result in gains for the patient’s journey and will encourage home treatments and better transitions.Peritoneal dialysis as the initial treatment modality seems appropriate for many reasons and the limitations of the technique are largely overcome by the advantages (namely autonomy, preservation of veins, and preservation of residual renal function).The transition after peritoneal dialysis can (and should) be carried out with the primacy of home treatments. Assisted dialysis must be considered and countries must organize themselves to provide an assisted dialysis program with paid caregivers.The anticipation of the transition is essential to improve outcomes, although there are no predictive models that have high accuracy; this is particularly important in the transition to hemodialysis (at home or in-center) in order to plan autologous access that allows a smooth transition.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
The practice and clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) have demonstrated significant improvement over the past 20 years. The aim of this review is to increase awareness and update healthcare professionals on current PD practice, especially with respect to patient and technique survival, patient modality selection, pathways onto PD, understanding patient experience of care and use prior to kidney transplantation. These improvements have been impacted, at least in part, by greater emphasis on shared decision-making in dialysis modality selection, the use of advanced laparoscopic techniques for PD catheter implantation, developments in PD connecting systems, glucose-sparing strategies, and modernising technology in managing automated PD patients remotely. Evidence-based clinical guidelines such as those prepared by national and international societies such as the International Society of PD have contributed to improved PD practice underpinned by a recognition of the place of continuous quality improvement processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman Karkar
- Medical Affairs - Renal Care, Scientific Office, Baxter A.G., Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Martin Wilkie
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Herries Road, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Portolés J, Vega A, Lacoba E, López-Sánchez P, Botella M, Yuste C, Martín Cleary C, Sanz Ballesteros S, González Sanchidrian S, Sánchez García L, Carreño A, Bajo MA, Janeiro D. Is peritoneal dialysis suitable technique CKD patients over 65 years? A prospective multicenter study. Nefrologia 2021; 41:529-538. [PMID: 36165135 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2021.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in patients older than 65 years and is related to morbidity, frailty, and dependence. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has classically been associated with young patients with an active life. HYPOTHESIS PD should be offered to patients over 65 years. We search for any unfavorable results that may advice not to recommend PD therapy for this group. OBJECTIVE To describe PD treatment and outcomes in patients > 65 years, to compare their results with patients < 65 years and to identify areas with room for improvement in a real-life study. STUDY Prospective, observational, and multicenter study performed in incident PD patients, from January 2003 until January 2018. RESULTS We included 2,435 PD patients, 31.9% were older than 65 years; there was a difference of 25 years between both groups. Median follow up was 2.1 years. Older than 65 years group had more comorbidity: Diabetes (29.5% vs 17.2%; p < 0.001), previous CV events 34.5% vs 14.0%; p < 0.001), Charlson index (3.8 vs 3.0; p < 0.001). We did not find differences in efficacy and PD adequacy objectives fulfillment, anaemia management or blood pressure during follow-up. Peritonitis rate was higher in older 65 years group (0.65 vs 0.45 episodes/patient/year; p < 0.001), but there was not differences in germs, admission rate and follow up. Mortality was higher in older 65 years group (28.4% vs 9.4%) as expected. PD permanence probability was similar (2.1 years). The main cause of PD withdrawal was transplant in group < 65 years (48.3%) and transfer to HD in group > 65 years. The main reason was caregiver or patient fatigue (20.2%), and not technique failure (7.3%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a relation (HR [95%CI]) between mortality and age > 65 years 2.4 [1.9-3.0]; DM 1.6 [1.3-2.1]; CV events 2.1 [1.7-2.7]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identify a relation between technique failure and age > 65 years 1.5 [1.3-1.9]; DM 1.6 [1.3-1.9] and previous transplant 1.5 [1.2-2.0]. CONCLUSION Patients older than 65 years fulfilled PD adequacy criteria during the follow up. We believe PD is a valid option for patients older 65 years. It is necessary to try to prevent infections and patient/caregiver fatigue, to avoid HD transfer for reasons not related to technique failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Portolés
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain.
| | - Almudena Vega
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain
| | - Enrique Lacoba
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain
| | | | - Mario Botella
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Claudia Yuste
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain; Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Catalina Martín Cleary
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain; Servicio de Nefrología, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Agustín Carreño
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - M Auxiliadora Bajo
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain; Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Darío Janeiro
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Portolés J, Vega A, Lacoba E, López-Sánchez P, Botella M, Yuste C, Martín Cleary C, Sanz Ballesteros S, González Sanchidrian S, Sánchez García L, Carreño A, Bajo MA, Janeiro D. Is peritoneal dialysis suitable technique CKD patients over 65 years? A prospective multicenter study. Nefrologia 2021. [PMID: 33610372 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in patients older than 65years and is related to morbidity, frailty, and dependence. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has classically been associated with young patients with an active life. HYPOTHESIS PD should be offered to patients over 65years. We search for any unfavorable results that may advice not to recommend PD therapy for this group. OBJECTIVE To describe PD treatment and outcomes in patients >65years, to compare their results with patients <65years and to identify areas with room for improvement in a real-life study. STUDY Prospective, observational, and multicenter study performed in incident PD patients, from January 2003 until January 2018. RESULTS We included 2,435 PD patients, 31.9% were older than 65years; there was a difference of 25years between both groups. Median follow up was 2.1years. Older than 65years group had more comorbidity: Diabetes (29.5% vs 17.2%; p<0.001), previous CV events 34.5% vs 14.0%; p<0.001), Charlson index (3.8 vs 3.0; p<0.001). We did not find differences in efficacy and PD adequacy objectives fulfillment, anaemia management or blood pressure during follow-up. Peritonitis rate was higher in older 65years group (0.65 vs 0.45 episodes/patient/year; p<0.001), but there was not differences in germs, admission rate and follow up. Mortality was higher in older 65years group (28.4% vs 9.4%) as expected. PD permanence probability was similar (2.1years). The main cause of PD withdrawal was transplant in group <65years (48.3%) and transfer to HD in group >65years. The main reason was caregiver or patient fatigue (20.2%), and not technique failure (7.3%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a relation (HR [95%CI]) between mortality and age>65years 2.4 [1.9-3.0]; DM 1.6 [1.3-2.1]; CV events 2.1 [1.7-2.7]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identify a relation between technique failure and age>65years 1.5 [1.3-1.9]; DM 1.6 [1.3-1.9] and previous transplant 1.5 [1.2-2.0]. CONCLUSION Patients older than 65years fulfilled PD adequacy criteria during the follow up. We believe PD is a valid option for patients older 65years. It is necessary to try to prevent infections and patient/caregiver fatigue, to avoid HD transfer for reasons not related to technique failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Portolés
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España.
| | - Almudena Vega
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España
| | - Enrique Lacoba
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España
| | | | - Mario Botella
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España
| | - Claudia Yuste
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España; Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - Catalina Martín Cleary
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España; Servicio de Nefrología, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, España
| | | | | | | | - Agustín Carreño
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, España
| | - M Auxiliadora Bajo
- REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España; Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - Darío Janeiro
- Servicio de Nefrología, H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España; REDInREN RETIC ISCIII 016/009, España
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fonseca-Correa JI, Farragher JF, Tomlinson G, Oliver MJ, Jain A, Flanagan S, Koyle K, Jassal SV. Longitudinal Changes in the Use of PD Assistance for Patients Maintained on Peritoneal Dialysis. KIDNEY360 2021; 2:469-476. [PMID: 35369021 PMCID: PMC8785991 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0006622020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Home dialysis therapies, such as peritoneal dialysis (PD), offer flexibility and improved well-being, particularly for older individuals. However, a substantial proportion require assistance with personal care and health care-related tasks. We hypothesized that patients and families would require less PD assistance as they became more familiar with PD-related tasks. The study objective was to assess whether the nature of, and need for, PD assistance decreased over time. Methods Using a multicentered, prospective, observational study design, patients aged ≥50 years were recruited from those starting PD. Patients underwent formal evaluation using validated components of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment at baseline, and they were followed monthly and administered a questionnaire about the need for assistance with PD-related tasks. Results A total of 111 patients (age 69±10 years, 68% men, and 56% diabetic) were followed for a total of 609 patient-months. Of those who needed help, 40% had help from a family member, and 33% were helped by nurses. Both the quantity and nature of help received by patients remained generally stable throughout follow-up and did not vary according to age, frailty, functional dependence, or cognitive impairment (P=0.93). The proportion of patients needing help varied widely across the 13 different tasks but appeared relatively stable across time. The paid-unpaid caregiver ratio for the different tasks did not change over time. Conclusions Older patients initiating PD in the outpatient setting have a high need for assistance with PD-related tasks, which seems to persist over the initial 6-month period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janine F. Farragher
- Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - George Tomlinson
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew J. Oliver
- Division of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arsh Jain
- Division of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Flanagan
- Division of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathleen Koyle
- Division of Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarbjit V. Jassal
- Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boyer A, Lanot A, Lambie M, Guillouet S, Lobbedez T, Béchade C. Trends in assisted peritoneal dialysis over the last decade: a cohort study from the French Peritoneal Dialysis Registry. Clin Kidney J 2021; 13:1003-1011. [PMID: 33391743 PMCID: PMC7769513 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited information available on the use of assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD) over time and the impact of economic incentives on its utilization. The aim of this study was to describe the trends in assisted PD utilization and the type of assistance provided. We wanted to estimate if an economic incentive implemented in 2011 in France was associated with an increase in the utilization of nurse-assisted PD. METHODS This retrospective, multicentre study, based on data from the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry, analysed 11 987 patients who initiated PD in France between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2015. Adjusted Cox regression with robust variance was used to examine the initiation of assisted PD, both nurse-assisted and family-assisted, accounting for the nonlinear impact of the PD starting time. RESULTS There were 6149 (51%) incident patients on assisted PD, 5052 (82%) on nurse-assisted PD and 1097 (18%) on family-assisted PD over the study period. In the adjusted analysis, calendar time was associated with the assisted PD rate: it declined from 2008 until 2013 before flattening out and then it increased after 2014. Nurse-assisted PD utilization increased significantly after 2012, whereas family-assisted PD utilization decreased linearly over time (prevalence ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.92-0.97). CONCLUSIONS The assisted PD rate decreased until 2013, mainly because of a decline in family-assisted PD. The uptake in nurse-assisted PD observed from 2013 reflects the effect of an economic incentive adopted in late 2011 to increase PD utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabel Boyer
- Centre Universitaire des Maladies Rénales, CHU de Caen, 14 033 Caen Cedex 9, France.,U1086, INSERM-ANTICIPE-Centre, Régional de Lutte contre, le Cancer, François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Antoine Lanot
- Centre Universitaire des Maladies Rénales, CHU de Caen, 14 033 Caen Cedex 9, France.,U1086, INSERM-ANTICIPE-Centre, Régional de Lutte contre, le Cancer, François Baclesse, Caen, France.,Normandie Université, Unicaen, UFR, de médecine, 2 rue des Rochambelles, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
| | - Mark Lambie
- Renal Unit, Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Sonia Guillouet
- Centre Universitaire des Maladies Rénales, CHU de Caen, 14 033 Caen Cedex 9, France.,U1086, INSERM-ANTICIPE-Centre, Régional de Lutte contre, le Cancer, François Baclesse, Caen, France.,Normandie Université, Unicaen, UFR, de médecine, 2 rue des Rochambelles, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
| | - Thierry Lobbedez
- Centre Universitaire des Maladies Rénales, CHU de Caen, 14 033 Caen Cedex 9, France.,U1086, INSERM-ANTICIPE-Centre, Régional de Lutte contre, le Cancer, François Baclesse, Caen, France.,Normandie Université, Unicaen, UFR, de médecine, 2 rue des Rochambelles, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
| | - Clémence Béchade
- Centre Universitaire des Maladies Rénales, CHU de Caen, 14 033 Caen Cedex 9, France.,U1086, INSERM-ANTICIPE-Centre, Régional de Lutte contre, le Cancer, François Baclesse, Caen, France.,Normandie Université, Unicaen, UFR, de médecine, 2 rue des Rochambelles, 14032 Caen Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Baumgart A, Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Shen JI, Ruiz L, Wang AYM, Yip T, Fung SKS, Tong M, Lee A, Cho Y, Viecelli AK, Sautenet B, Teixeira-Pinto A, Brown EA, Brunier G, Dong J, Scholes-Robertson N, Dunning T, Mehrotra R, Naicker S, Pecoits-Filho R, Perl J, Wilkie M, Tong A. Meaning of empowerment in peritoneal dialysis: focus groups with patients and caregivers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35:1949-1958. [PMID: 32712672 PMCID: PMC7824999 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While peritoneal dialysis (PD) can offer patients more independence and flexibility compared with in-center hemodialysis, managing the ongoing and technically demanding regimen can impose a burden on patients and caregivers. Patient empowerment can strengthen capacity for self-management and improve treatment outcomes. We aimed to describe patients' and caregivers' perspectives on the meaning and role of patient empowerment in PD. METHODS Adult patients receiving PD (n = 81) and their caregivers (n = 45), purposively sampled from nine dialysis units in Australia, Hong Kong and the USA, participated in 14 focus groups. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. RESULTS We identified six themes: lacking clarity for self-management (limited understanding of rationale behind necessary restrictions, muddled by conflicting information); PD regimen restricting flexibility and freedom (burden in budgeting time, confined to be close to home); strength with supportive relationships (gaining reassurance with practical assistance, comforted by considerate health professionals, supported by family and friends); defying constraints (reclaiming the day, undeterred by treatment, refusing to be defined by illness); regaining lost vitality (enabling physical functioning, restoring energy for life participation); and personal growth through adjustment (building resilience and enabling positive outlook, accepting the dialysis regimen). CONCLUSIONS Understanding the rationale behind lifestyle restrictions, practical assistance and family support in managing PD promoted patient empowerment, whereas being constrained in time and capacity for life participation outside the home undermined it. Education, counseling and strategies to minimize the disruption and burden of PD may enhance satisfaction and outcomes in patients requiring PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Baumgart
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jenny I Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Lorena Ruiz
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Angela Yee-Moon Wang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Terence Yip
- Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Samuel K S Fung
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Jockey Club Nephrology and Urology Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Matthew Tong
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Pok Oi Hospital, Yuen Long, Hong Kong, China
| | - Achilles Lee
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Benedicte Sautenet
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Nephrology-Hypertension, Kidney Transplantation, Dialysis, Tours Hospital, SPHERE-INSERM 1246, University of Tours and Nantes, Tours, France
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Edwina A Brown
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gillian Brunier
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Dong
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tony Dunning
- South Bank Technical and Further Education, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Kidney Research Institute, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Saraladevi Naicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital Unity Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Wilkie
- Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Eroglu E, Heimbürger O, Lindholm B. Peritoneal dialysis patient selection from a comorbidity perspective. Semin Dial 2020; 35:25-39. [PMID: 33094512 DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Despite many medical and socioeconomic advantages, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an underutilized dialysis modality that in most countries is used by only 5%-20% of dialysis patients, while the vast majority are treated with in-center hemodialysis. Several factors may explain this paradox, such as lack of experience and infrastructure for training and monitoring of PD patients, organizational issues, overcapacity of hemodialysis facilities, and lack of economic incentives for dialysis centers to use PD instead of HD. In addition, medical conditions that are perceived (rightly or wrongly) as contraindications to PD represent barriers for the use of PD because of their purported potential negative impact on clinical outcomes in patients starting PD. While there are few absolute contraindications to PD, high age, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, polycystic kidney disease, heart failure, and previous history of abdominal surgery and renal allograft failure, may be seen (rightly or wrongly) as relative contraindications and thus barriers to initiation of PD. In this brief review, we discuss how the presence of these conditions may influence the strategy of selecting patients for PD, focusing on measures that can be taken to overcome potential problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eray Eroglu
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erciyes University School of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.,Division of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Heimbürger
- Division of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Lindholm
- Division of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chua HR, MacLaren G, Choong LHL, Chionh CY, Khoo BZE, Yeo SC, Sewa DW, Ng SY, Choo JCJ, Teo BW, Tan HK, Siow WT, Agrawal RV, Tan CS, Vathsala A, Tagore R, Seow TYY, Khatri P, Hong WZ, Kaushik M. Ensuring Sustainability of Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in the Face of Extraordinary Demand: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 76:392-400. [PMID: 32505811 PMCID: PMC7272152 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
With the exponential surge in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide, the resources needed to provide continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) for patients with acute kidney injury or kidney failure may be threatened. This article summarizes subsisting strategies that can be implemented immediately. Pre-emptive weekly multicenter projections of CKRT demand based on evolving COVID-19 epidemiology and routine workload should be made. Corresponding consumables should be quantified and acquired, with diversification of sources from multiple vendors. Supply procurement should be stepped up accordingly so that a several-week stock is amassed, with administrative oversight to prevent disproportionate hoarding by institutions. Consumption of CKRT resources can be made more efficient by optimizing circuit anticoagulation to preserve filters, extending use of each vascular access, lowering blood flows to reduce citrate consumption, moderating the CKRT intensity to conserve fluids, or running accelerated KRT at higher clearance to treat more patients per machine. If logistically feasible, earlier transition to intermittent hemodialysis with online-generated dialysate, or urgent peritoneal dialysis in selected patients, may help reduce CKRT dependency. These measures, coupled to multicenter collaboration and a corresponding increase in trained medical and nursing staffing levels, may avoid downstream rationing of care and save lives during the peak of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Horng-Ruey Chua
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Graeme MacLaren
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic & Vascular Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Lina Hui-Lin Choong
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Chang-Yin Chionh
- Department of Renal Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - See-Cheng Yeo
- Department of Renal Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Duu-Wen Sewa
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Shin-Yi Ng
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Surgical Intensive Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jason Chon-Jun Choo
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Boon-Wee Teo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Han-Khim Tan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Wen-Ting Siow
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Rohit Vijay Agrawal
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Anaesthesia, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Chieh-Suai Tan
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Anantharaman Vathsala
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rajat Tagore
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Terina Ying-Ying Seow
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Priyanka Khatri
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore; Fast and Chronic Programmes, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore
| | - Wei-Zhen Hong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore; Fast and Chronic Programmes, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore
| | - Manish Kaushik
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Van Biesen W, Lameire N. Increasing peritoneal dialysis initiation worldwide: ‘there are none so blind as those who will not see’. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35:1458-1461. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Wim Van Biesen
- Renal Division, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stern LD, Waikar S. Time to Expand Access and Utilization of Home Dialysis: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95:1323-1324. [PMID: 32622441 PMCID: PMC7264034 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren D Stern
- Renal Section, Boston University School of Medicine, MA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ryan L, Brown E. Supporting and maintaining the frail patient on long-term renal replacement therapy. Clin Med (Lond) 2020; 20:139-141. [PMID: 32188646 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The number of frail patients reaching end-stage kidney disease is increasing. They have a high level of comorbidity and symptom burden which need to be considered when making management plans. For those who choose renal replacement therapy, it is important to establish goals and ceilings of care and to provide holistic care focusing on optimising quality of life. Advance care planning is the process of documenting the patient's preferences for their treatment in the event they lose capacity to make decisions about their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Ryan
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, London, UK
| | - Edwina Brown
- Imperial College London, London, UK and consultant nephrologist, Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abra G, Schiller B. Public policy and programs – Missing links in growing home dialysis in the United States. Semin Dial 2020; 33:75-82. [DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Abra
- Satellite Healthcare San Jose CA USA
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto CA USA
| | - Brigitte Schiller
- Satellite Healthcare San Jose CA USA
- Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Imbeault B, Nadeau-Fredette AC. Optimization of Dialysis Modality Transitions for Improved Patient Care. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2019; 6:2054358119882664. [PMID: 31666977 PMCID: PMC6798163 DOI: 10.1177/2054358119882664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose of review: Initial and subsequent modality decisions are important, impacting both
clinical outcomes and quality of life. Transition from chronic kidney
disease to dialysis and between dialysis modalities are periods were
patients may be especially vulnerable. Reviewing our current knowledge
surrounding these critical periods and identifying areas for future research
may allow us to develop dialysis strategies beneficial to patients. Sources of information: We searched the electronic database PubMed and queried Google Scholar for
English peer-reviewed articles using appropriate keywords (non-exhaustive
list): dialysis transitions, peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis,
integrated care pathway, and health-related quality of life. Primary sources
were accessed whenever possible. Methods: In this narrative review, we aim to expose the controversies surrounding
home-dialysis first strategies and examine the evidence underpinning
home-dialysis first strategies as well as home-to-home and home-to-in-center
transitions. Key findings: Diverse factors must be taken into consideration when choosing initial and
subsequent dialysis modalities. Given the limitations of available data (and
lack of convincing benefit or detriment of one modality over the other),
patient-centered considerations may prime over suspected mortality benefits
of one modality or another. Limitations: Available data stem almost exclusively from retrospective and observational
studies, often using large national and international databases, susceptible
to bias. Furthermore, this is a narrative review which takes into account
the views and opinions of the authors, especially as it pertains to optimal
dialysis pathways. Implications: Emphasis must be placed on individual patient goals and preferences during
modality selection while planning ahead to achieve timely and appropriate
transitions limiting discomfort and anxiety for patients. Further research
is required to ascertain specific interventions which may be beneficial to
patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Imbeault
- Division of Nephrology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette
- Division of Nephrology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Research Center, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lavoie JG, Zacharias J, Kaufert J, Krueger N, Kinew KA, Mcleod L, Chartrand C. Is Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis a Solution for Northern Manitoba? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 14:52-65. [PMID: 31322114 PMCID: PMC7008677 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) continues to fundamentally impact the lives of First Nations (FN) patients. Home peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers patients more mobility and flexibility, but few Manitoba FNs have availed themselves of this option. Objective: This paper discusses Manitoba FNs' experience of PD, to highlight enablers and barriers to expanding the use of PD in rural and remote Manitoba communities. Methods: We analyzed interviews of individuals living with ESKD (N = 14), family caregivers (N = 14) and healthcare providers and administrators (N = 27). Results: Barriers to PD uptake include medical suitability, patients' distrust of home modalities and fear in their ability to manage. Other factors include limited family support and lack of appropriate housing. Conclusions: Assisted peritoneal dialysis (APD) is an emerging model where PD supplies are centrally located, and where a cohort of PD patients can provide mutual support with added assistance from an APD worker. This model could mitigate existing treatment barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Kathi Avery Kinew
- Manager, Research & Social Development Initiatives, First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - Lorraine Mcleod
- Province-Wide Coordinator, Diabetes Integration Project, First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - Caroline Chartrand
- Director, Diabetes Integration Project, First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vinson AJ, Perl J, Tennankore KK. Survival Comparisons of Home Dialysis Versus In-Center Hemodialysis: A Narrative Review. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2019; 6:2054358119861941. [PMID: 31321065 PMCID: PMC6628511 DOI: 10.1177/2054358119861941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose of review: Many observational studies have demonstrated a survival benefit with home dialysis compared with in-center dialysis; however, results have been conflicting. The purpose of this review was to identify pitfalls and limitations in existing literature and examine the challenges of studying home and in-center dialysis populations. Sources of information: Original research articles were identified from MEDLINE using search terms “in-center hemodialysis,” “home hemodialysis,” “conventional hemodialysis,” “nocturnal hemodialysis,” and “short daily hemodialysis.” Methods: A focused review and critical appraisal of existing home versus in-center hemodialysis survival literature was conducted to identify potential causes for variability in the observed survival outcomes. Key findings: The controversy in existing literature stems from the challenges of randomizing patients to home versus in-center hemodialysis modalities, and therefore a reliance on observational comparisons for study. In many cases, these observational analyses have been limited by selection bias (variabilities in populations included, inclusion of both incident and prevalent cohorts, and variabilities in dialysis intensity), as well as residual confounding. Furthermore, the studies that do exist lack generalizability in many cases. Limitations: There are few randomized controlled trials examining the survival benefit of home versus in-center hemodialysis and existing observational studies are often limited by bias and reduced generalizability. These limitations comprise the body of this review. Implications: This review examines challenges surrounding survival comparisons with home versus in-center hemodialysis and identify important directions for future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Vinson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karthik K Tennankore
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Manera KE, Craig JC, Johnson DW, Tong A. The Power of the Patient Voice: Conducting and Using Qualitative Research to Improve Care and Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2019; 38:242-245. [PMID: 29987064 DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia .,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.,Metro South and Ipswich Nephrology and Transplant Services (MINTS), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guillouët S, Lobbedez T, Lanot A, Verger C, Ficheux M, Béchade C. Factors associated with nurse assistance among peritoneal dialysis patients: a cohort study from the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018; 33:1446-1452. [PMID: 29294042 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfx338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background No information is available regarding nurse-assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD) in non-elderly subjects. This study was carried out to estimate the rate of nurse-assisted PD among non-elderly patients and to assess which individual and centre factors were associated with nurse-assisted PD. The other objective was to estimate the magnitude of the centre effect on the utilization of nurse-assisted PD using hierarchical modelling. Methods This was a retrospective study based on data from the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry. Patients incident on PD > 18 and < 65 years of age were included. Results There were 2269 incidents of PD initiation between January 2008 and December 2012 in 127 PD centres with 114 (5%) on family-assisted PD and 272 (12%) on nurse-assisted PD. At the individual level, compared with autonomous patients, nurse assistance was associated with age {odds ratio [OR] 1.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.51-2.13]}, gender [OR 0.47 (95% CI 0.35-0.64)], comorbidities and underlying nephropathy. There was significant heterogeneity between centres in the nurse assistance utilization (variance of random effect 0.12). At the centre level, the type of centre, centre experience, centre organization and private nurse density were not associated with nurse-assisted PD. Conclusions The rate of nurse-assisted PD among non-elderly patients was 12%. There was a significant centre effect in the utilization of nurse assistance that was not explained by the centres' characteristics. Nurse-assisted PD utilization in non-elderly patients is associated with patient characteristics and also with centre practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Guillouët
- Service de Néphrologie, CHU de Caen, Caen Cedex 9, France.,Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française, Pontoise, France
| | - Thierry Lobbedez
- Service de Néphrologie, CHU de Caen, Caen Cedex 9, France.,Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française, Pontoise, France.,Université Caen Normandie-UFR de Médecine (Medical School), Caen Cedex 5, France
| | - Antoine Lanot
- Service de Néphrologie, CHU de Caen, Caen Cedex 9, France.,Université Caen Normandie-UFR de Médecine (Medical School), Caen Cedex 5, France
| | - Christian Verger
- Registre de Dialyse Péritonéale de Langue Française, Pontoise, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pommer W, Wagner S, Müller D, Thumfart J. Attitudes of nephrologists towards assisted home dialysis in Germany. Clin Kidney J 2018; 11:400-405. [PMID: 29942506 PMCID: PMC6007628 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfx108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 08/28/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assisted home dialysis (AHD) is an option to combine the benefits of home dialysis therapy with the needs of dialysis patients who are unable to perform self-treatment at home. While this method is growing in many countries worldwide, no data so far are reported for Germany. METHODS A survey was designed to identify the barriers to the implementation of AHD with the focus on attitudes and beliefs concerning AHD. The survey was sent to all 2060 members of the Germany Society of Nephrology. RESULTS The response rate was 14% of nephrologists (n = 286), representing 24% of all German centres. AHD was regarded as a highly meaningful option (>90% of all responding nephrologists). Fifty-five percent of the centres practice AHD (preferred peritoneal dialysis). The number of treated patients on AHD was small (77% of the centres treat no more than 10 patients). The nephrologists in centres that performed AHD were of older age and the number of dialysis patients treated in these centres was greater. AHD was offered in 57% of centres at chronic kidney disease Stage 4. Inadequate conventional dialysis and patient's request were reasons for choosing AHD. Barriers for offering AHD were lack of reimbursement, shortage of staff, lack of expertise and lack of team motivation. CONCLUSIONS In the view of German nephrologists, AHD is a meaningful method to provide home dialysis care. Inadequate funding and a lack of qualified staff were identified as severe barriers to implementation of AHD. To overcome these barriers and to achieve a higher penetration of AHD, dedicated actions have to be considered. Further studies are needed to prove the AHD concept with regard to outcome effects and cost efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Pommer
- Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation (KfH), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | | | - Dominik Müller
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Thumfart
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Woodrow G, Fan SL, Reid C, Denning J, Pyrah AN. Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on peritoneal dialysis in adults and children. BMC Nephrol 2017; 18:333. [PMID: 29145808 PMCID: PMC5691857 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0687-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
These guidelines cover all aspects of the care of patients who are treated with peritoneal dialysis. This includes equipment and resources, preparation for peritoneal dialysis, and adequacy of dialysis (both in terms of removing waste products and fluid), preventing and treating infections. There is also a section on diagnosis and treatment of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, a rare but serious complication of peritoneal dialysis where fibrotic (scar) tissue forms around the intestine. The guidelines include recommendations for infants and children, for whom peritoneal dialysis is recommended over haemodialysis.Immediately after the introduction there is a statement of all the recommendations. These recommendations are written in a language that we think should be understandable by many patients, relatives, carers and other interested people. Consequently we have not reworded or restated them in this lay summary. They are graded 1 or 2 depending on the strength of the recommendation by the authors, and A-D depending on the quality of the evidence that the recommendation is based on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Woodrow
- St James's University Hospital Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| | | | - Christopher Reid
- Evelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeannette Denning
- Peritoneal Dialysis Unit, St James's University Hospital Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reducing the costs of chronic kidney disease while delivering quality health care: a call to action. Nat Rev Nephrol 2017; 13:393-409. [PMID: 28555652 DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) imposes substantial societal costs. Expenditure is highest for renal replacement therapy (RRT), especially in-hospital haemodialysis. Redirection towards less expensive forms of RRT (peritoneal dialysis, home haemodialysis) or kidney transplantation should decrease financial pressure. However, costs for CKD are not limited to RRT, but also include nonrenal health-care costs, costs not related to health care, and costs for patients with CKD who are not yet receiving RRT. Even if patients with CKD or ESRD could be given the least expensive therapies, costs would decrease only marginally. We therefore propose a consistent and sustainable approach focusing on prevention. Before a preventive strategy is favoured, however, authorities should carefully analyse the cost to benefit ratio of each strategy. Primary prevention of CKD is more important than secondary prevention, as many other related chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, liver disease, cancer, and pulmonary disorders could also be prevented. Primary prevention largely consists of lifestyle changes that will reduce global societal costs and, more importantly, result in a healthy, active, and long-lived population. Nephrologists need to collaborate closely with other sectors and governments, to reach these aims.
Collapse
|