1
|
Figueiredo AE, Bowes E, Chow JSF, Hurst H, Neumann JL, Walker R, Brunier G. PD effluent specimen collection: Your questions answered. Perit Dial Int 2023; 43:442-447. [PMID: 36475557 DOI: 10.1177/08968608221136389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
When a patient on peritoneal dialysis (PD) presents with suspected PD-related peritonitis (e.g. cloudy PD fluid and abdominal pain), one of the most important initial aspects of management is for the nephrology nurse/home dialysis nurse to collect PD effluent specimens for white blood cells count, Gram stain, culture and sensitivity for inspection and to send for laboratory testing before antibiotics are started. A review by seven members of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) Nursing Committee of all 133 questions posted to the ISPD website 'Questions about PD' over the last 4 years (January 2018-December 2021), revealed 97 posted by nephrology nurses from around the world. Of these 97 questions, 10 were noted to be related to best practices for PD effluent specimen collection. For our review, we focused on these 10 questions along with their responses by the members of the ISPD 'Ask The Experts Team', whereby existing best practice recommendations were considered, if available, relevant literature was cited and differences in international practice discussed. We revised the original responses for clarity and updated the references. We found that these 10 questions were quite varied but could be organised into four categories: how to collect PD effluent safely; how to proceed with PD effluent collection; how to collect PD effluent for assessment; and how to proceed with follow-up PD effluent collection after intraperitoneal antibiotics have been started. In general, we found that there was limited evidence in the PD literature to answer several of these 10 questions posted to the ISPD website 'Questions about PD' by nephrology nurses from around the world on this important clinical topic of best practices for PD effluent specimen collection. Some of these questions were also not addressed in the latest ISPD Peritonitis Guidelines. Moreover, when polling members of our ISPD Nursing Committee we found when answering a few of these questions, nursing practice varied within and among countries. We encourage PD nurses to conduct their own research on this important topic, focusing on areas where research evidence is lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana E Figueiredo
- School of Health Sciences and Life, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegra, Brazil
| | - Elaine Bowes
- Kings College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Josephine Sau Fan Chow
- Clinical Innovation & Business Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Australia
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Australia
| | - Helen Hurst
- The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Figueiredo AE, Brunier G. Reducing and treating peritoneal dialysis catheter-related infections: Nursing implementation from evidence to practice. Perit Dial Int 2023; 43:197-200. [PMID: 37303129 DOI: 10.1177/08968608231172912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ana E Figueiredo
- School of Health Sciences and Life, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manera KE, Johnson DW, Cho Y, Sautenet B, Shen J, Kelly A, Yee-Moon Wang A, Brown EA, Brunier G, Perl J, Dong J, Wilkie M, Mehrotra R, Pecoits-Filho R, Naicker S, Dunning T, Craig JC, Tong A. Scope and heterogeneity of outcomes reported in randomized trials in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. Clin Kidney J 2021; 14:1817-1825. [PMID: 34221389 PMCID: PMC8243273 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized trials can provide evidence to inform decision-making but this may be limited if the outcomes of importance to patients and clinicians are omitted or reported inconsistently. We aimed to assess the scope and heterogeneity of outcomes reported in trials in peritoneal dialysis (PD). METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialized Register for randomized trials in PD. We extracted all reported outcome domains and measurements and analyzed their frequency and characteristics. RESULTS From 128 reports of 120 included trials, 80 different outcome domains were reported. Overall, 39 (49%) domains were surrogate, 23 (29%) patient-reported and 18 (22%) clinical. The five most commonly reported domains were PD-related infection [59 (49%) trials], dialysis solute clearance [51 (42%)], kidney function [45 (38%)], protein metabolism [44 (37%)] and inflammatory markers/oxidative stress [42 (35%)]. Quality of life was reported infrequently (4% of trials). Only 14 (12%) trials included a patient-reported outcome as a primary outcome. The median number of outcome measures (defined as a different measurement, aggregation and metric) was 22 (interquartile range 13-37) per trial. PD-related infection was the most frequently reported clinical outcome as well as the most frequently stated primary outcome. A total of 383 different measures for infection were used, with 66 used more than once. CONCLUSIONS Trials in PD include important clinical outcomes such as infection, but these are measured and reported inconsistently. Patient-reported outcomes are infrequently reported and nearly half of the domains were surrogate. Standardized outcomes for PD trials are required to improve efficiency and relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Benedicte Sautenet
- Department of Nephrology-Hypertension, Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation, Tours Hospital, Tours, France
- INSERM, U1246, SPHERE, Tours, France
| | - Jenny Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Ayano Kelly
- Centre for Kidney Research, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Angela Yee-Moon Wang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Edwina A Brown
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jie Dong
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Martin Wilkie
- Department of Nephrology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Division of Nephrology/Department of Medicine, Kidney Research Institute and Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Saraladevi Naicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baumgart A, Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Shen JI, Ruiz L, Wang AYM, Yip T, Fung SKS, Tong M, Lee A, Cho Y, Viecelli AK, Sautenet B, Teixeira-Pinto A, Brown EA, Brunier G, Dong J, Scholes-Robertson N, Dunning T, Mehrotra R, Naicker S, Pecoits-Filho R, Perl J, Wilkie M, Tong A. Meaning of empowerment in peritoneal dialysis: focus groups with patients and caregivers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35:1949-1958. [PMID: 32712672 PMCID: PMC7824999 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While peritoneal dialysis (PD) can offer patients more independence and flexibility compared with in-center hemodialysis, managing the ongoing and technically demanding regimen can impose a burden on patients and caregivers. Patient empowerment can strengthen capacity for self-management and improve treatment outcomes. We aimed to describe patients' and caregivers' perspectives on the meaning and role of patient empowerment in PD. METHODS Adult patients receiving PD (n = 81) and their caregivers (n = 45), purposively sampled from nine dialysis units in Australia, Hong Kong and the USA, participated in 14 focus groups. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. RESULTS We identified six themes: lacking clarity for self-management (limited understanding of rationale behind necessary restrictions, muddled by conflicting information); PD regimen restricting flexibility and freedom (burden in budgeting time, confined to be close to home); strength with supportive relationships (gaining reassurance with practical assistance, comforted by considerate health professionals, supported by family and friends); defying constraints (reclaiming the day, undeterred by treatment, refusing to be defined by illness); regaining lost vitality (enabling physical functioning, restoring energy for life participation); and personal growth through adjustment (building resilience and enabling positive outlook, accepting the dialysis regimen). CONCLUSIONS Understanding the rationale behind lifestyle restrictions, practical assistance and family support in managing PD promoted patient empowerment, whereas being constrained in time and capacity for life participation outside the home undermined it. Education, counseling and strategies to minimize the disruption and burden of PD may enhance satisfaction and outcomes in patients requiring PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Baumgart
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jenny I Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Lorena Ruiz
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Angela Yee-Moon Wang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Terence Yip
- Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Samuel K S Fung
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Jockey Club Nephrology and Urology Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Matthew Tong
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Pok Oi Hospital, Yuen Long, Hong Kong, China
| | - Achilles Lee
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Benedicte Sautenet
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Nephrology-Hypertension, Kidney Transplantation, Dialysis, Tours Hospital, SPHERE-INSERM 1246, University of Tours and Nantes, Tours, France
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Edwina A Brown
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gillian Brunier
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Dong
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tony Dunning
- South Bank Technical and Further Education, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Kidney Research Institute, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Saraladevi Naicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital Unity Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Wilkie
- Sheffield Kidney Institute, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brunier G, Gray B, Coulis N, Savage J, Manuel A, McConnell H, Mildon B, Sherlock AM. The Use of Community Nurses for Home Peritoneal Dialysis: Is it Cost -Effective? Perit Dial Int 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/089686089601601s95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In the late 1970s, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was first introduced as a mode of treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Since that time many patients, themselves or with the help of family members, have routinely performed the therapy at home. There are now 2935 home peritoneal dialysis patients in Canada (36% of the total dialysis population}. Today, however, the average patient on dialysis is likely to be older and have other complicating illnesses; moreover, patients may live alone, or have family members who are working. Over the past three years, through the use of innovative assistive devices and strong educational links with community nursing agencies, we have been able to manage peritoneal dialysis patients with complex needs in the home. We performed a retrospective analysis of 18 patients, with severe comorbid conditions, who were managed in the home with the help of community nurses. We will show that this is an economic, efficient, and effective method of caring for home dialysis patients with severe disabilities. Home care agencies need our support so that they can continue to help us manage the complex peritoneal dialysis patient in the 1990s.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barbara Gray
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy Coulis
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Judy Savage
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arif Manuel
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Shen JI, Gutman T, Cho Y, Wang AYM, Brown EA, Brunier G, Dong J, Dunning T, Mehrotra R, Naicker S, Pecoits-Filho R, Perl J, Wilkie M, Tong A. Establishing a Core Outcome Set for Peritoneal Dialysis: Report of the SONG-PD (Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis) Consensus Workshop. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75:404-412. [PMID: 31955922 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials in peritoneal dialysis (PD) are diverse, are measured inconsistently, and may not be important to patients, families, and clinicians. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis (SONG-PD) initiative aims to establish a core outcome set for trials in PD based on the shared priorities of all stakeholders. We convened an international SONG-PD stakeholder consensus workshop in May 2018 in Vancouver, Canada. Nineteen patients/caregivers and 51 health professionals attended. Participants discussed core outcome domains and implementation in trials in PD. Four themes relating to the formation of core outcome domains were identified: life participation as a main goal of PD, impact of fatigue, empowerment for preparation and planning, and separation of contributing factors from core factors. Considerations for implementation were identified: standardizing patient-reported outcomes, requiring a validated and feasible measure, simplicity of binary outcomes, responsiveness to interventions, and using positive terminology. All stakeholders supported inclusion of PD-related infection, cardiovascular disease, mortality, technique survival, and life participation as the core outcome domains for PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Australasian Kidney Trials Network, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Australia
| | - Jenny I Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
| | - Talia Gutman
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Australasian Kidney Trials Network, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Edwina A Brown
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jie Dong
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Kidney Research Institute and Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology/Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Saraladevi Naicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Martin Wilkie
- Department of Nephrology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gutman T, Manera KE, Baumgart A, Johnson DW, Wilkie M, Boudville N, Craig JC, Dong J, Jesudason S, Mehrotra R, Neu A, Shen JI, Van Biesen W, Blake PG, Brunier G, Cho Y, Jefferson N, Lenga I, Mann N, Mendelson AA, Perl J, Sanabria RM, Scholes-Roberston N, Schwartz D, Teitelbaum I, Tong A. “Can I go to Glasgow?” Learnings from patient involvement at the 17th Congress of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD). Perit Dial Int 2020; 40:12-25. [DOI: 10.1177/0896860819880101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Recognition of the discrepancy between the research priorities of patients and health professionals has prompted efforts to involve patients as active contributors in research activities, including scientific conferences. However, there is limited evidence about the experience, challenges, and impacts of patient involvement to inform best practice. This study aims to describe patient and health professional perspectives on patient involvement at the Congress of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD). Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 patients/caregivers and 15 health professionals from six countries who attended ISPD. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results: We identified four themes: protecting and enhancing scientific learning (grounding science in stories, sharing and inspiring new perspectives, distilling the key messages of research presentations, striking a balance between accommodating patients and presenting the science); democratizing access to research (redistributing power, challenging the traditional ownership of knowledge, cultivating self-management through demystifying research); inadequate support for patient/caregiver delegates (lacking purposeful inclusion, challenges in interpreting research findings, soliciting medical advice, difficulty negotiating venue and program, limited financial assistance in attending); and amplifying impact beyond the room (sparking innovation in practice, giving patients and families hope for the future). Conclusions: Patient involvement at the ISPD Congress clarified the applicability of research to patient care and self-management, democratized science, and strengthened the potential impact of research. More structured support for patients to help them purposefully articulate their experience in relation to session objectives may enhance their contribution and their own learning experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia Gutman
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda Baumgart
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Queensland, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Neil Boudville
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jie Dong
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shilpa Jesudason
- Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Kidney Health Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Kidney Research Institute and Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology/Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alicia Neu
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jenny I Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | | | - Peter G Blake
- Division of Nephrology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nichole Jefferson
- Patient and Family Partnership Council, Kidney Health Initiative, American Society of Nephrology, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ilan Lenga
- Division of Nephrology, Lakeridge Health, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neelem Mann
- Fraser Health Renal Program, Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Centre, Abbotsford, Canada
| | - Asher A Mendelson
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nicole Scholes-Roberston
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Better Evidence and Translation in Chronic Kidney Disease (BEAT-CKD) Consumer Advisory Board, Australia
| | - Daniel Schwartz
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Colombia, Fraser Health Home Peritoneal Dialysis Program, British Colombia, Canada
| | - Isaac Teitelbaum
- University of Colorado Denver – Anschutz Medical Campus, CO, USA
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Manera KE, Tong A, Craig JC, Shen J, Jesudason S, Cho Y, Sautenet B, Teixeira-Pinto A, Howell M, Wang AYM, Brown EA, Brunier G, Perl J, Dong J, Wilkie M, Mehrotra R, Pecoits-Filho R, Naicker S, Dunning T, Scholes-Robertson N, Johnson DW. An international Delphi survey helped develop consensus-based core outcome domains for trials in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2019; 96:699-710. [PMID: 31200941 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Shared decision-making about clinical care options in end-stage kidney disease is limited by inconsistencies in the reporting of outcomes and the omission of patient-important outcomes in trials. Here we generated a consensus-based prioritized list of outcomes to be reported during trials in peritoneal dialysis (PD). In an international, online, three-round Delphi survey, patients/caregivers and health professionals rated the importance of outcomes using a 9-point Likert scale (with 7-9 indicating critical importance) and provided comments. Using a Best-Worst Scale (BWS), the relative importance of outcomes was estimated. Comments were analyzed thematically. In total, 873 participants (207 patients/caregivers and 666 health professionals) from 68 countries completed round one, 629 completed round two and 530 completed round three. The top outcomes were PD-related infection, membrane function, peritoneal dialysis failure, cardiovascular disease, death, catheter complications, and the ability to do usual activities. Compared with health professionals, patients/caregivers gave higher priority to six outcomes: blood pressure (mean difference, 0.4), fatigue (0.3), membrane function (0.3), impact on family/friends (0.1), peritoneal thickening (0.1) and usual activities (0.1). Four themes were identified that underpinned the reasons for ratings: contributing to treatment longevity, preserving quality of life, escalating morbidity, and irrelevant and futile information and treatment. Patients/caregivers and health professionals gave highest priority to clinical outcomes. In contrast to health professionals, patients/caregivers gave higher priority to lifestyle-related outcomes including the impact on family/friends and usual activities. Thus, prioritization will inform a core outcome set to improve the consistency and relevance of outcomes for trials in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jenny Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Shilpa Jesudason
- Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Australian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Benedicte Sautenet
- University François Rabelais, Tours, France; Department of Nephrology-Hypertension, Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation, Tours Hospital, Tours, France; Methods in Patient-Centered Outcomes & Health Research, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1246, Tours, France
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Howell
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Angela Yee-Moon Wang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Edwina A Brown
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Brunier
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (retired), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Dong
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Martin Wilkie
- Department of Nephrology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Kidney Research Institute and Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil; Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Saraladevi Naicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Tony Dunning
- South Bank Technical and Further Education, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Australian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Manera KE, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Shen JI, Ruiz L, Wang AYM, Yip T, Fung SKS, Tong M, Lee A, Cho Y, Viecelli AK, Sautenet B, Teixeira-Pinto A, Brown EA, Brunier G, Dong J, Dunning T, Mehrotra R, Naicker S, Pecoits-Filho R, Perl J, Wilkie M, Tong A. Patient and Caregiver Priorities for Outcomes in Peritoneal Dialysis: Multinational Nominal Group Technique Study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 14:74-83. [PMID: 30573659 PMCID: PMC6364541 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.05380518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The absence of accepted patient-centered outcomes in research can limit shared decision-making in peritoneal dialysis (PD), particularly because PD-related treatments can be associated with mortality, technique failure, and complications that can impair quality of life. We aimed to identify patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in PD, and to describe the reasons for their choices. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Patients on PD and their caregivers were purposively sampled from nine dialysis units across Australia, the United States, and Hong Kong. Using nominal group technique, participants identified and ranked outcomes, and discussed the reasons for their choices. An importance score (scale 0-1) was calculated for each outcome. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS Across 14 groups, 126 participants (81 patients, 45 caregivers), aged 18-84 (mean 54, SD 15) years, identified 56 outcomes. The ten highest ranked outcomes were PD infection (importance score, 0.27), mortality (0.25), fatigue (0.25), flexibility with time (0.18), BP (0.17), PD failure (0.16), ability to travel (0.15), sleep (0.14), ability to work (0.14), and effect on family (0.12). Mortality was ranked first in Australia, second in Hong Kong, and 15th in the United States. The five themes were serious and cascading consequences on health, current and impending relevance, maintaining role and social functioning, requiring constant vigilance, and beyond control and responsibility. CONCLUSIONS For patients on PD and their caregivers, PD-related infection, mortality, and fatigue were of highest priority, and were focused on health, maintaining lifestyle, and self-management. Reporting these patient-centered outcomes may enhance the relevance of research to inform shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; .,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Australian Kidney Trials Network, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jenny I Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Lorena Ruiz
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor, University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Angela Yee-Moon Wang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Terence Yip
- Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Samuel K S Fung
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Jockey Club Nephrology and Urology Centre, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China
| | - Matthew Tong
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Pok Oi Hospital, Yuen Long, Hong Kong, China
| | - Achilles Lee
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Australian Kidney Trials Network, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.,Australian Kidney Trials Network, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Benedicte Sautenet
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University François Rabelais, Tours, France.,Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Tours Hospital, Tours, France.,U1246, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, University François Rabelais, Tours, France
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Edwina Anne Brown
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gillian Brunier
- Division of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (retired), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Dong
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tony Dunning
- South Bank Technical and Further Education, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Kidney Research Institute and Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Saraladevi Naicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and
| | - Martin Wilkie
- Department of Nephrology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Manera K, Johnson D, Craig J, Shen J, Wang A, Yip T, Fung S, Tong M, Cho Y, Viecelli A, Sautenet B, Teixeira-Pinto A, Brown E, Brunier G, Dong J, Dunning T, Mehrotra R, Naicker S, Pecoits-Filho R, Perl J, Wilkie M. FP495PATIENT AND CAREGIVER PRIORITIES FOR OUTCOMES IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS: AN INTERNATIONAL NOMINAL GROUP STUDY. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy104.fp495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Johnson
- Australian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jonathan Craig
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jenny Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States
| | - Angela Wang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Terence Yip
- Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Samuel Fung
- Department of Medicine & Geriatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Matthew Tong
- Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Pok Oi Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Australian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Andrea Viecelli
- Australian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Benedicte Sautenet
- Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Tours Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Edwina Brown
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gillian Brunier
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jie Dong
- Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tony Dunning
- South Bank, TAFE Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Division of Nephrology/Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sarala Naicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Jeffrey Perl
- Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Martin Wilkie
- Department of Nephrology, Department of Nephrology, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Manera KE, Tong A, Craig JC, Brown EA, Brunier G, Dong J, Dunning T, Mehrotra R, Naicker S, Pecoits-Filho R, Perl J, Wang AY, Wilkie M, Howell M, Sautenet B, Evangelidis N, Shen JI, Johnson DW. Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis (SONG-PD): Study Protocol for Establishing a Core Outcome Set in PD. Perit Dial Int 2017; 37:639-647. [PMID: 28765167 PMCID: PMC5878088 DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, approximately 11% of patients on dialysis receive peritoneal dialysis (PD). Whilst PD may offer more autonomy to patients compared with hemodialysis, patient and caregiver burnout, technique failure, and peritonitis remain major challenges to the success of PD. Improvements in care and outcomes are likely to be mediated by randomized trials of innovative therapies, but will be limited if the outcomes measured and reported are not important for patients and clinicians. The aim of the Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis (SONG-PD) study is to establish a set of core outcomes for trials in patients on PD based on the shared priorities of all stakeholders, so that outcomes of most relevance for decision-making can be evaluated, and that interventions can be compared reliably. METHODS The 5 phases in the SONG-PD project are: a systematic review to identify outcomes and outcome measures that have been reported in randomized trials involving patients on PD; focus groups using nominal group technique with patients and caregivers to identify, rank, and describe reasons for their choice of outcomes; semi-structured key informant interviews with health professionals; a 3-round international Delphi survey involving a multi-stakeholder panel; and a consensus workshop to review and endorse the proposed set of core outcome domains for PD trials. DISCUSSION The establishment of 3 to 5 high-priority core outcomes, to be measured and reported consistently in all trials in PD, will enable patients and clinicians to make informed decisions about the relative effectiveness of interventions, based upon outcomes of common importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine E Manera
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Edwina A Brown
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gillian Brunier
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Dong
- Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Kidney Research Institute and Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology/Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sarala Naicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Y Wang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Martin Wilkie
- Department of Nephrology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Martin Howell
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Benedicte Sautenet
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
- University François Rabelais, Tours, France, Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Tours Hospital, Tours, France, INSERM, Tours, France
| | - Nicole Evangelidis
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jenny I Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - David W Johnson
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Metro South and Ipswich Nephrology and Transplant Services (MINTS), Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang AYM, Brimble KS, Brunier G, Holt SG, Jha V, Johnson DW, Kang SW, Kooman JP, Lambie M, McIntyre C, Mehrotra R, Pecoits-Filho R. ISPD Cardiovascular and Metabolic Guidelines in Adult Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Part II - Management of Various Cardiovascular Complications. Perit Dial Int 2016; 35:388-96. [PMID: 26228783 DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular mortality has remained high in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) due to the high prevalence of various cardiovascular complications including coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy and dysfunction, heart failure, arrhythmia (especially atrial fibrillation), cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease. In addition, nearly a quarter of PD patients develop sudden cardiac death as the terminal life event. Thus, it is essential to identify effective treatment that may lower cardiovascular mortality and improve survival of PD patients. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) commissioned a global workgroup in 2012 to formulate a series of recommendation statements regarding lifestyle modification, assessment and management of various cardiovascular risk factors, and management of the various cardiovascular complications to be published in 2 guideline documents. This publication forms the second part of the guideline documents and includes recommendation statements on the management of various cardiovascular complications in adult chronic PD patients. The documents are intended to serve as a global clinical practice guideline for clinicians who look after PD patients. We also define areas where evidence is clearly deficient and make suggestions for future research in each specific area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - K Scott Brimble
- St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gillian Brunier
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen G Holt
- Division of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vivekanand Jha
- George Institute for Global Health India, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - David W Johnson
- University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia Centre for Kidney Disease Research, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Shin-Wook Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University, Korea
| | - Jeroen P Kooman
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Lambie
- Health Services Research Unit, Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Chris McIntyre
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, Derby, United Kingdom
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology/Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Figueiredo AE, Bernardini J, Bowes E, Hiramatsu M, Price V, Su C, Walker R, Brunier G. A Syllabus for Teaching Peritoneal Dialysis to Patients and Caregivers. Perit Dial Int 2016; 36:592-605. [PMID: 26917664 DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2015.00277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2015] [Accepted: 01/10/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Being aware of controversies and lack of evidence in peritoneal dialysis (PD) training, the Nursing Liaison Committee of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) has undertaken a review of PD training programs around the world in order to develop a syllabus for PD training. This syllabus has been developed to help PD nurses train patients and caregivers based on a consensus of training program reviews, utilizing current theories and principles of adult education. It is designed as a 5-day program of about 3 hours per day, but both duration and content may be adjusted based on the learner. After completion of our proposed PD training syllabus, the PD nurse will have provided education to a patient and/or caregiver such that the patient/caregiver has the required knowledge, skills and abilities to perform PD at home safely and effectively. The course may also be modified to move some topics to additional training times in the early weeks after the initial sessions. Extra time may be needed to introduce other concepts, such as the renal diet or healthy lifestyle, or to arrange meetings with other healthcare professionals. The syllabus includes a checklist for PD patient assessment and another for PD training. Further research will be needed to evaluate the effect of training using this syllabus, based on patient and nurse satisfaction as well as on infection rates and longevity of PD as a treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana E Figueiredo
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Elaine Bowes
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Valerie Price
- Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Chunyan Su
- Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rachael Walker
- Hawke's Bay District Health Board, New Zealand, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang AYM, Brimble KS, Brunier G, Holt SG, Jha V, Johnson DW, Kang SW, Kooman JP, Lambie M, McIntyre C, Mehrotra R, Pecoits-Filho R. ISPD Cardiovascular and Metabolic Guidelines in Adult Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Part I - Assessment and Management of Various Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Perit Dial Int 2015; 35:379-87. [PMID: 26228782 PMCID: PMC4520720 DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2014] [Accepted: 01/31/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease contributes significantly to the adverse clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Numerous cardiovascular risk factors play important roles in the development of various cardiovascular complications. Of these, loss of residual renal function is regarded as one of the key cardiovascular risk factors and is associated with an increased mortality and cardiovascular death. It is also recognized that PD solutions may incur significant adverse metabolic effects in PD patients. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) commissioned a global workgroup in 2012 to formulate a series of recommendations regarding lifestyle modification, assessment and management of various cardiovascular risk factors, as well as management of the various cardiovascular complications including coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmia (specifically atrial fibrillation), cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease and sudden cardiac death, to be published in 2 guideline documents. This publication forms the first part of the guideline documents and includes recommendations on assessment and management of various cardiovascular risk factors. The documents are intended to serve as a global clinical practice guideline for clinicians who look after PD patients. The ISPD workgroup also identifies areas where evidence is lacking and further research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - K Scott Brimble
- St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gillian Brunier
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen G Holt
- Division of Nephrology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Vivekanand Jha
- George Institute for Global Health India, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - David W Johnson
- University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia Centre for Kidney Disease Research, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Shin-Wook Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University, Korea
| | - Jeroen P Kooman
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark Lambie
- Health Services Research Unit, Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | - Chris McIntyre
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital Centre, Derby, United Kingdom
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology/Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Roberto Pecoits-Filho
- School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cho P, Exconde E, Sulit V, Brunier G, Espiritu A, Taruc E, Drayton S. Redesigning peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site classification. CANNT J 2012; 22:39-41. [PMID: 22558682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Patsy Cho
- Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Office E206b, Toronto, ON.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brunier G. A certain synergy. CANNT J 2011; 21:4-5. [PMID: 21561011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
|
17
|
Brunier G, Hiller JA, Drayton S, Pugash RA, Tobe SW. A change to radiological peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: three-month outcomes. Perit Dial Int 2010; 30:528-33. [PMID: 20421428 DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2009.00114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Best practices for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion call for timely placement of catheters to reduce complications and increase the likelihood of a successful initiation of PD. The purpose of our study was to assess if a change in approach to PD catheter insertion, including a switch to radiological insertion of PD catheters and introduction of a dialysis access nurse to coordinate all patient care, was associated with more outpatient procedures and achievement of guideline-based outcomes, including timelier PD starts. ♢ METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of all patients that had their first PD catheter inserted at our center over a 7-year period ending in 2007. ♢ RESULTS PD catheters were placed in 88 patients by interventional radiology and in 125 patients by surgical insertion during an earlier period. Insertion of PD catheters by interventional radiology was significantly associated with a higher rate of outpatient procedures (70% vs 32%, p < 0.0001) than surgical placement. At PD start, 82% of patients that underwent radiological insertions had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of over 8 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) and their mean serum albumin level was 38.2 g/L. ♢ CONCLUSIONS The new procedure of radiological insertion of PD catheters, coordinated by a dedicated dialysis access nurse, was associated with more outpatient procedures than the earlier surgical method and allowed patients to receive a PD catheter with timing consistent with clinical practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Brunier
- Division of Nephrology and Department of Radiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brunier G. Looking after our health and our patients' health. CANNT J 2010; 20:4-5. [PMID: 20642158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
|
19
|
Murray MA, Brunier G, Chung JO, Craig LA, Mills C, Thomas A, Stacey D. A systematic review of factors influencing decision-making in adults living with chronic kidney disease. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 76:149-158. [PMID: 19324509 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2008] [Revised: 10/25/2008] [Accepted: 12/06/2008] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors influencing patient involvement in decision-making in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and effective interventions to support their decision-making needs. METHODS A systematic review included studies and decision support tools that involved: (1) adults with CKD, (2) studies published from 1998-2008; and (3) a focus on patient decision-making needs, and/or barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making. Studies were quality appraised. RESULTS Forty studies were appraised. These studies mainly focused on the decisions patients with CKD faced around the choice of renal replacement therapy and withholding/withdrawing dialysis. Moreover, studies typically focused on health care professional's provision of information about the decision rather than identifying decisional conflict and supporting patients in decision-making. No studies were found that identified the patient's point of view about factors that might influence or inhibit quality decision-making. Factors influencing CKD patient's participation in decision included: (1) interpersonal relationships; (2) preservation of current well being, normality and quality of life; (3) need for control; and (4) personal importance on benefits and risks. Of the four patient decision aids identified, none had been evaluated for effectiveness. CONCLUSION Patients with CKD face decisions that are likely to cause decisional conflict. Most studies focused on information needs related to renal replacement therapy and withdrawing or withholding dialysis. There was less focus on other decision-making needs in the context of those choices and across the trajectory of CKD. Although patient decision aids and implementation of shared decision-making have been evaluated in patients with other medical conditions, little is known about interventions to support patients with CKD making quality decisions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Patients with CKD have decision-making needs across the trajectory of their illness. Although little is known about supporting patients with CKD decision-making, support could be provided with protocols and tools that have been developed for other chronic illness situations. Development of CKD-specific clinical practice guidelines that include decision support best practices could benefit CKD patients. Research priorities include development and evaluation of CKD focused decision support tools and processes.
Collapse
|
20
|
Brunier G. Cardiac devices and more! CANNT J 2009; 19:4-5. [PMID: 19899496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
|
21
|
Brunier G, Naimark DMJ, Hladunewich MA. Meeting the guidelines for end-of-life care. Adv Perit Dial 2006; 22:175-9. [PMID: 16983965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
The number of patients initiating dialysis in most countries continues to increase, with the greatest increase being in the oldest age group. Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to help the nephrology team with end-of-life carefor patients on dialysis. The aim of the project reported here was to assess if we were meeting the guidelines. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients 80 years of age and older who had started dialysis at our center Our cohort included 105 patients (50% men; median age: 84.5 years; age range: 80-95 years), of whom 55% were on hemodialysis and 45% were on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Overall life expectancy was 2.1 years. Among the 59 patients who died while still part of our program, 92% had a do not resuscitate order in place, and 46% had withdrawn from dialysis. Palliative care was consulted in 46% of cases. Dyspnea and pain were the two most common symptoms in the last 24 hours of life. Of these 59 patients, 71% died in hospital. Only 6 patients died at home, all of these being on home PD. End-of-life care for this elderly cohort of dialysis patients could be improved on several measures to meet clinical practice guidelines, especially with greater access to palliative care units and community palliative care programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Brunier
- Division of Nephrology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brunier G. The need for mentorship. CANNT J 2005; 15:6-7. [PMID: 16268029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
|
23
|
Brunier G. Hypertension management for Canadians: a multidisciplinary approach. CANNT J 2005; 15:6-7. [PMID: 16050360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
|
24
|
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of renal peer support volunteers (PSVs) and explore the effects on their psychological well-being from helping others. BACKGROUND Dialysis patients, transplant patients and family members who become renal PSVs receive special training in empathy, listening, self-awareness and problem solving. The trained renal PSVs offer a unique service to others struggling to learn to live with renal failure because they have faced the same struggles. METHODS This exploratory study utilized a longitudinal design. The first time for data collection was immediately after the volunteers had completed a Kidney Foundation of Canada training programme. Subsequent interviews were at time intervals of 4, 8 and 12 months after the first interview. Information on the psychological well-being of the volunteers was collected at each interview in two different ways: the 38-item Mental Health Inventory (MHI) and open-ended questions. FINDINGS Thirty-one PSVs completed all four interviews. The average age of the volunteers was 45 years and almost half had a university level of education. They identified themselves as belonging to 12 different ethno-cultural groups. Analysis of the quantitative data from the MHI indicated that the mental health of the PSVs stayed remarkably stable over time. Analysis of the qualitative data from the open-ended questions revealed four major themes which, taken together, showed notable increases in personal growth and well-being for the PSVs over time. CONCLUSION After participating in a training programme, renal PSVs maintained, and possibly improved, their own well-being by helping others with chronic renal failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Brunier
- Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brunier G, Turpin C. A writing workshop for the CANNT Journal. J CANNT 1999; 8:27-8. [PMID: 10196929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Writing for publication requires special skills and understanding. The aim of this workshop held by the co-editors of the CANNT Journal was to help participants identify the first steps needed to initiate the process of writing for publication. During the workshop, the attendees were invited to join small groups with a facilitator for each group. The individual groups identified what they considered to be their first five steps to writing for publication. This information from each group was shared with all the attendees. At the end of the session, helpful tools to aid potential authors were identified and thoughts on future writing workshops were discussed.
Collapse
|
26
|
Brunier G, Turpin C. Publish or perish: the inside story. J CANNT 1998; 8:26-7. [PMID: 9582755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
27
|
Brunier G. Peer review unmasked. J CANNT 1997; 7:23-5. [PMID: 9362729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Brunier
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Brunier G. Care of the hemodialysis patient with a new permanent vascular access: review of assessment and teaching. ANNA J 1996; 23:547-56; quiz 557-8. [PMID: 9069783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Problems related to vascular access are the main reasons for admission to hospitals for hemodialysis patients today. Some patients develop vascular access problems prior to use and many require repeated surgery. This article addresses some of the key aspects of patient assessment and monitoring in the immediate preoperative/postoperative period. The focus is on the prevention of early vascular access failure. Approaches for patient teaching are included, as are strategies that should be part of a vascular access management program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Brunier
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
The study compared level of fatigue measured by two self-report instruments in 43 patients on chronic haemodialysis. The two fatigue measures were the multi-item fatigue subscale of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and a single-item visual analogue scale (VAS). There was a significant relationship between the two measures (r = 0.80); however, the shared variance was only 64%. Males and females, as well as subjects of different ages, responded to the two scales in different ways. Nurses need to know that different tools may give different results, even when the same concept, that is fatigue, is being measured in the same subjects at the same time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Brunier
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brunier G. Peritonitis in patients on peritoneal dialysis: a review of pathophysiology and treatment. ANNA J 1995; 22:575-84; quiz 585-6. [PMID: 8633902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of peritonitis has decreased in peritoneal dialysis patients because of new delivery systems and connecting devices; however, peritonitis is still of major concern. Peritonitis remains the most common reason for admission to hospitals and is still a primary reason for failure of this method of dialysis. Nephrology nurses need a clear understanding of peritonitis etiology, recommended treatment regimens, side effects of treatment, and complications. This should enable nephrology nurses to provide a higher level of care, and, thus, improve patient well-being.
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Nurses in every area of clinical practice are confronted with the challenge of caring for patients in pain. The purpose of this study was to determine nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain in the acute and long-term care settings of a large Canadian teaching hospital. This paper reports the results of a pain survey completed by 514 nurses using the Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey (Ferrell and Leek, 1990). The mean percent score was 41. Nurses with a university education scored significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than those nurses who were not university prepared. Nurses who had attended educational sessions on pain management within the last year also scored significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than those who had not attended. Results indicated that nurses lacked knowledge and understanding of basic pain management principles, opioid usage, and acute and chronic pain. These results supported the value of advanced educational preparation and continuing education sessions for nurses, and the need and direction for pain management programs at this hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Brunier
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, North York, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|