Emergency Department Visits after Kidney Transplantation

Ultrasound Utilization in Hospitalized Kidney Transplant Recipients: Useful or Overused?

Kidney transplant ultrasonography is an important diagnostic tool in the care of transplant recipients. This modality of nonradiation-based imaging allows for precise and expedient reporting of allograft architecture, which can inform clinical decision-making. However, as with any diagnostic tool, overuse may lead to unnecessary interventions and costs on the healthcare system. To better understand the use of ultrasonography in hospitalized kidney transplant recipients and outcomes of subsequent interventions, we conducted a single-center retrospective study at a large transplant program in Ontario, Canada. We noted that over 30% of admissions resulted in a ultrasonographic survey within the first 24 h of presentation; however, most of these did not change clinical management or lead to a subsequent procedural intervention. Using multivariable logistic regression, we identified predictors for receiving an ultrasound, including time from transplantation, elevated serum creatinine and infectious diagnosis. Procedural interventions (e.g., drain or biopsy) resulted from less than 20% of all ultrasound investigations, with patients closer to the time of index transplant or with elevated serum creatinine values more likely to receive an intervention. In conducting a cost analysis, we estimated that approximately $80 000 CAD per year could be saved with more selective decisions on ultrasound requisitions. Overall, our results indicate that despite being an informative tool, the broad use of ultrasonography in the kidney transplant population may not yield significant changes to transplant care.

Validation of risk scores for prediction of severe pneumonia in kidney transplant recipients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia

PURPOSE

Risk scores for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are widely used for standardized assessment in immunocompetent patients and to identify patients at risk for severe pneumonia and death. In immunocompromised patients, the prognostic value of pneumonia-specific risk scores seems to be reduced, but evidence is limited. The value of different pneumonia risk scores in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) is not known.

METHODS

Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed 310 first CAP episodes after kidney transplantation in 310 KTR. We assessed clinical outcomes and validated eight different risk scores (CRB-65, CURB-65, DS-CRB-65, qSOFA, SOFA, PSI, IDSA/ATS minor criteria, NEWS-2) for the prognosis of severe pneumonia and in-hospital mortality. Risk scores were assessed up to 48 h after admission, but always before an endpoint occurred. Multiple imputation was performed to handle missing values.

RESULTS

In total, 16 out of 310 patients (5.2%) died, and 48 (15.5%) developed severe pneumonia. Based on ROC analysis, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and national early warning score 2 (NEWS-2) performed best, predicting severe pneumonia with AUC of 0.823 (0.747-0.880) and 0.784 (0.691-0.855), respectively.

CONCLUSION

SOFA and NEWS-2 are best suited to identify KTR at risk for the development of severe CAP. In contrast to immunocompetent patients, CRB-65 should not be used to guide outpatient treatment in KTR, since there is a 7% risk for the development of severe pneumonia even in patients with a score of zero.

Clinical profile of re-hospitalizations in pediatric kidney and liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplantation has evolved in recent decades, resulting in a rise in patient and graft survival. Frequent hospitalizations affect graft function, patients' health, and quality of life. This study characterizes the frequency and causes of post-transplant hospitalizations among pediatric recipients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study evaluating pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTR) and liver transplant recipients (LTR) aged 0-21 years, followed at a tertiary pediatric center in Israel from 2012 to 2017. Data were collected starting at 60 days post-transplantation. Diagnoses of admissions were based on clinical, laboratory, and radiographic findings.

RESULTS

Forty-nine KTR experienced 199 all-cause re-hospitalizations (median number of re-hospitalizations per patient - 3 (IQR [interquartile range] 1-5.5), while 351 re-hospitalizations were recorded in 56 LTR (median - 5 [IQR 2-8.8]). Median follow-up time was 2.2 years for KTR (IQR 1-3.9) and 3 years for LTR (IQR 2.1-4.1). The most common cause for hospitalization for both cohorts was infection (50.8% and 62%, respectively). Gram-negative bacteria were the most common pathogens identified in KTR, while viral pathogens were more common in LTR (51% and 57% of pathogen-identified cases, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study to describe rehospitalizations for pediatric solid organ recipients. The hospital admission rate was higher in LTR in comparison to KTR. Infections were the most common cause of hospitalization throughout the whole study period in both populations. Frequent hospitalizations impose a heavy burden on patients and their families; better understanding of hospitalization causes may help to minimize their frequency.

A nationwide study of regional preference and graft survival of kidney transplantation in South Korea: patterns of centralization in the capital area

Purpose

This study aims to investigate regional patterns and graft survival rates in kidney transplantation (KT) within South Korea using the National Health Insurance Service database.

Methods

By analyzing KT data from 2002 to 2017, including patient residency, KT location, and post-KT dialysis information, graft survival was assessed through post-KT dialysis and validated against Ulsan University Hospital and the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry's 2017 report.

Results

Among the 20,978 KTs, 60.5% occurred in the Korean capital, Seoul, whereas 39.5% occurred outside. The overall graft survival rate was 81.5% with a median survival duration of 57 months. Patient survival was 83.8%, with a median survival duration of 61 months. For KTs from 2002 to 2007, the 10-year graft and patient survival rates were 89.1% and 90.3%, respectively. The KT recipients living outside Seoul who underwent the KT within their residential regions had a graft survival rate of 88.3%, and those receiving KTs outside their original region had a graft survival rate of 88.0%. Among Seoul residents who underwent KTs in the city, the graft survival rate was 90.5%. Importantly, hospital location did not significantly affect graft survival rates (P = 0.136).

Conclusion

This study revealed a regional preference for KT in South Korea, particularly in the capital city, likely because of nonresidents. Nevertheless, the graft and patient survival rates showed no significant regional disparities. These findings emphasize the necessity for equitable KT service access across regions in order to optimize patient outcomes.

Results of a multicenter cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial testing the effectiveness of a bioinformatics-enabled pharmacist intervention in transplant recipients

An ambulatory medication safety dashboard was developed to identify missing labs, concerning labs, drug interactions, nonadherence, and transitions in care. This system was tested in a 2-year, prospective, cluster-randomized, controlled multicenter study. Pharmacists at 5 intervention sites used the dashboard to address medication safety issues, compared with usual care provided at 5 control sites. A total of 2196 transplant events were included (1300 intervention vs 896 control). During the 2-year study, the intervention arm had a 11.3% (95% confidence interval, 7.1%-15.5%) absolute risk reduction of having ≥1 emergency department (ED) visit (44.2% vs 55.5%, respectively; P < .001, respectively) and a 12.3% (95% confidence interval, 8.2%-16.4%) absolute risk reduction of having ≥1 hospitalization (30.1% vs 42.4%, respectively; P < .001). In those with ≥1 event, the median ED visit rate (2 [interquartile range (IQR) 1, 5] vs 2 [IQR 1, 4]; P = .510) and hospitalization rate (2 [IQR 1, 3] vs 2 [IQR 1, 3]; P = .380) were similar. Treatment effect varied by comorbidity burden, previous ED visits or hospitalizations, and heart or lung recipients. A bioinformatics dashboard-enabled, pharmacist-led intervention reduced the risk of having at least one ED visit or hospitalization, predominantly demonstrated in lower risk patients.

ACLP Best Practice Guidance: Evaluation and Treatment of Depression in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

We present Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry best practice guidance on depression in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, which resulted from the collaboration of Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry's transplant psychiatry special interest group and Guidelines and Evidence-Based Medicine Subcommittee. Depression (which in the transplant setting may designate depressive symptoms or depressive disorders) is a frequent problem among SOT recipients. Following a structured literature review and consensus process, the Academy of Consultation Liaison Psychiatry transplant psychiatry special interest group proposes recommendations for practice: all organ transplant recipients should be screened routinely for depression. When applicable, positive screening should prompt communication with the mental health treating provider or a clinical evaluation. If the evaluation leads to a diagnosis of depressive disorder, treatment should be recommended and offered. The recommendation for psychotherapy should consider the physical and cognitive ability of the patient to maximize benefit. The first-line antidepressants of choice are escitalopram, sertraline, and mirtazapine. Treating depressive disorders prior to transplantation is recommended to prevent posttransplant depression. Future research should address the mechanism by which transplant patients develop depressive disorders, the efficacy and feasibility of treatment interventions (both pharmacological and psychotherapeutic, in person and via telemedicine), and the resources available to transplant patients for mental health care.

Utilization of the emergency department by kidney transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study from a high-volume transplant center

This study aims to assess the trends of emergency department (ED) visits among kidney transplant recipients in a high-volume transplant centre.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study targeted patients who underwent renal transplantation at a high-volume transplant centre from 2016 to 2020. The main outcomes of the study were ED visits within 30 days, 31-90 days, 91-180 days, and 181-365 days of transplantation.

Results

This study included 348 patients. The median (interquartile range) age of patients was 45.0 years (30.8, 58.2). Over half of the patients were male (57.2%). There was a total of 743 ED visits during the first year after discharge. 19% (n=66) were considered high-frequency users. High-volume ED users tended to be admitted more frequently as compared to those with low frequencies of ED visits (65.2% vs. 31.2%, respectively, P<0.001).

Conclusion

As evident by the large number of ED visits, suitable coordination of management through the ED remains a pivotal component of post-transplant care. Strategies addressing prevention of complications of surgical procedures or medical care and infection control are aspects with potential for enhancement.

Depression in transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review and summarize the literature published between 1 January 2020 and 30 June 2022, on the prevalence, risk factors and impact of depression in transplant population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Depression is common in transplantation candidates and recipients, with a prevalence up to 85.8% in kidney recipients. Multiple studies have indicated after transplantation depression correlates with increased mortality and with higher healthcare utilization. Social risk factors for posttransplant depression include financial difficulties and unemployment, while less is understood about the biological substrate of depression in this population. There is evidence that dynamic psychotherapy is effective for depression in organ transplant recipients, while cognitive behavioral therapy or supportive therapy did not lead to improvement of depression in transplant recipients. For living organ donors, the rates of depression are similar to the general population, with financial factors and the clinical status of the recipient playing a significant role.

SUMMARY

Depression is a common finding in transplant population. More research is needed to understand the biological substrate and risk factors and to develop effective treatment interventions.

Emergency department visits and hospital admissions in kidney transplant recipients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A hospital-based study

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected daily living and the healthcare system. No previous study has described the consequences of COVID-19 on emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admission among kidney transplant (KT) recipients.

AIM

To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ED visits and hospital admissions within 1 year in patients who underwent KT in Thailand.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study at a university hospital in Thailand. We reviewed the hospital records of KT patients who visited the ED during the outbreak of COVID-19 (from January 2020 to December 2021). We used the previous 2 years as the control period in the analysis. We obtained baseline demographics and ED visit characteristics for each KT patient. The outcomes of interest were ED visits and ED visits leading to hospital admission within the 1^st year following a KT. The rate of ED visits and ED visits leading to hospital admissions between the two periods were compared using the stratified Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 263 patients were included in this study: 112 during the COVID-19 period and 151 during the control period. There were 34 and 41 ED visits after KT in the COVID-19 and control periods, respectively. The rate of first ED visit at 1 year was not significantly different in the COVID-19 period, compared with the control period [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54-1.92; P = 0.96]. The hospital admission rate was similar between periods (HR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.50-1.69; P = 0.78).

CONCLUSION

ED visits and hospital admissions within the 1^st year in KT recipients were not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite these findings, we believe that communication between post-KT patients and healthcare providers is essential to highlight the importance of prompt ED visits for acute health conditions, particularly in post-KT patients.

Emergency department use and hospital admissions among adult orthotopic heart transplant patients

Objective

To study the demographics, clinical presentations, and outcomes of emergency department (ED) visits of patients with heart transplantation (HT) in the United States.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis of the National Emergency Department Sample database from 2016 to 2018. All ED visits of patients with HT aged ≥ 18 years were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes.

Results

Out of a total 308,182,495 national ED visits, 55,583 were HT‐related visits. The median age was 61.07 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 46.91–69.38) and 69.44% were males. The hospital admission rate was 54.3% and median inpatient length of stay was 3.19 days (IQR: 1.63–5.92). The mortality rate during inpatient stay was 1.16%. Median inpatient and ED charges among admitted patients were $37,911 (IQR: $21,487–$71,262). The most common primary diagnosis of HT‐related ED visits was sepsis (4.3%) followed by acute kidney injury (3.57%) and chest pain (3%).

Conclusion

More than half of total ED visits among HT patients resulted in hospital admission. The most common cause for ED visit in these patients was sepsis followed by acute kidney injury and chest pain.

Characterizing 30-d Postoperative Acute Care Visits: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Collaborative Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Many postoperative acute care visits (PACVs) are likely more appropriately addressed in lower acuity settings; however, the frequency and nature of PACVs are not currently tracked by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and the overall burden to emergency departments and urgent care centers is unknown.

METHODS

NSQIP collaborative data were augmented to prospectively capture 30-d PACVs for 1 y starting October 2018 across all NSQIP specialties, including visit reason and disposition. Data were analyzed using binomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 9933 patients were identified; 12.0% (n = 1193) presented to an acute care setting over 1413 visits, most commonly for surgical pain (15.4%) in the absence of an identified complication. Visits most commonly resulted in discharge (n = 817, 68.5%) or admission (n = 343, 24.3%). Variables independently associated with visits resulting in discharge included age (odds ratio [OR] 0.99 per year, P < 0.001), increasing comorbidities (1-2 [OR 1.55, P < 0.001]; 3-4 [OR 2.51, P < 0.001]; 5+ [OR 2.79 P < 0.001]), operative duration (OR 1.08 per hour, P = 0.001), and nonelective (OR 1.20, P = 0.01) or urologic (OR 1.46, P = 0.01) procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

PACVs are an overlooked burden on emergency medicine providers and healthcare systems; most do not require admission and could be potentially triaged outside of the acute care setting with improved perioperative care infrastructure. Younger patients, those with multiple comorbidities, and those undergoing nonelective procedures deserve special attention when designing initiatives to address postoperative acute care utilization. Data regarding PACVs can be routinely collected with minor modifications to current NSQIP workflows.

Remote Mobile Outpatient Monitoring in Transplant (Reboot) 2.0: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

The number of solid organ transplants in Canada has increased 33% over the past decade. Hospital readmissions are common within the first year after transplant and are linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Nearly half of these admissions to the hospital appear to be preventable. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies hold promise to reduce admission to the hospital and improve patient outcomes, as they allow real-time monitoring and timely clinical intervention.

Objective

This study aims to determine whether an innovative mHealth intervention can reduce hospital readmission and unscheduled visits to the emergency department or transplant clinic. Our second objective is to assess the use of clinical and continuous ambulatory physiologic data to develop machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of infection, organ rejection, and early mortality in adult heart, kidney, and liver transplant recipients.

Methods

Remote Mobile Outpatient Monitoring in Transplant (Reboot) 2.0 is a two-phased single-center study to be conducted at the University Health Network in Toronto, Canada. Phase one will consist of a 1-year concealed randomized controlled trial of 400 adult heart, kidney, and liver transplant recipients. Participants will be randomized to receive either personalized communication using an mHealth app in addition to standard of care phone communication (intervention group) or standard of care communication only (control group). In phase two, the prior collected data set will be used to develop machine learning algorithms to identify early markers of rejection, infection, and graft dysfunction posttransplantation. The primary outcome will be a composite of any unscheduled hospital admission, visits to the emergency department or transplant clinic, following discharge from the index admission. Secondary outcomes will include patient-reported outcomes using validated self-administered questionnaires, 1-year graft survival rate, 1-year patient survival rate, and the number of standard of care phone voice messages.

Results

At the time of this paper’s completion, no results are available.

Conclusions

Building from previous work, this project will aim to leverage an innovative mHealth app to improve outcomes and reduce hospital readmission in adult solid organ transplant recipients. Additionally, the development of machine learning algorithms to better predict adverse health outcomes will allow for personalized medicine to tailor clinician-patient interactions and mitigate the health care burden of a growing patient population.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04721288; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04721288

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/26816

Definition and Analysis of Textbook Outcome: A Novel Quality Measure in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

"Textbook outcome" (TO) is a novel composite quality measure that encompasses multiple postoperative endpoints, representing the ideal "textbook" hospitalization for complex surgical procedures. We defined TO for kidney transplantation using a cohort from a high-volume institution.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent isolated kidney transplantation at our institution between 2016 and 2019 were included. TO was defined by clinician consensus at our institution to include freedom from intraoperative complication, postoperative reintervention, 30-day intensive care unit or hospital readmission, length of stay > 75th percentile of kidney transplant patients, 90-day mortality, 30-day acute rejection, delayed graft function, and discharge with a Foley catheter. Recipient, operative, financial characteristics, and post-transplant patient, graft, and rejection-free survival were compared between patients who achieved and failed to achieve TO.

RESULTS

A total of 557 kidney transplant patients were included. Of those, 245 (44%) achieved TO. The most common reasons for TO failure were delayed graft function (N = 157, 50%) and hospital readmission within 30 days (N = 155, 50%); the least common was mortality within 90 days (N = 6, 2%). Patient, graft, and rejection-free survival were significantly improved among patients who achieved TO. On average, patients who achieved TO incurred approximately $50,000 less in total inpatient charges compared to those who failed TO.

CONCLUSIONS

TO in kidney transplantation was associated with favorable post-transplant outcomes and significant cost-savings. TO may offer transplant centers a detailed performance breakdown to identify aspects of perioperative care in need of process improvement.

Management of the patient who has had a kidney transplant in the medical assessment unit

The number of people with kidney transplants has increased rapidly over the last 20 years. They are often medically complex and have a significant need for both routine and urgent care. Patients who have received a kidney transplant can be challenging to manage in the medical assessment unit. They are vulnerable to infections and acute kidney injury; disease presentation and course may be atypical and they are at risk of rapid deterioration. This review describes a systematic approach to their assessment and management and highlights specific considerations to be borne in mind.

Patterns of emergency department utilization between transplant and non-transplant centers and impact on clinical outcomes in kidney recipients

There is a high rate of Emergency Department (ED) utilization in kidney recipients post-transplant; ED visits are associated with readmission rates and lower survival rates. However, utilization within and outside transplant centers may lead to different outcomes. The objective was to analyze ED utilization patterns at transplant and non-transplant centers as well as common etiologies of ED visits and correlation with hospitalization, graft, and patient outcomes. This was a longitudinal, retrospective, single-center cohort study in kidney transplant recipients evaluating ED utilization. Comparator groups were determined by ED location, time from transplant, and disposition/readmission from ED visit. 1,106 kidney recipients were included in the study. ED utilization dropped at the transplant center after the 1st year (P < .001), while remaining at a similar rate at non-transplant centers (0.22 vs 1.06 VPPY). Infection and allograft complications were the most common causes of ED visits. In multivariable Cox modeling, an ED visit due to allograft complication at a non-transplant center >1 year post-transplant was associated with higher risk for graft loss and death (aHR 2.93 and aHR 1.75, P < .0001). The results of this study demonstrate an increased risk of graft loss among patients who utilize non-transplant center emergency departments. Improved communication and coordination between transplant centers and non-transplant centers may contribute to better long-term outcomes.

Alternative Diagnostic Strategy for the Assessment and Treatment of Pulmonary Embolus: A Case Series

Introduction

Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (FeMRA) can be used as an alternate and safe method to diagnose patients with compromised renal function who present with acute pulmonary embolus in the emergency department (ED) setting.

Case Report

A 62-year old man with a history of renal transplant and lymphoproliferative disease described new onset of breathlessness. His clinical symptoms were suggestive of pulmonary embolus. He underwent FeMRA in the ED to avoid exposure to intravenous iodinated contrast. FeMRA demonstrated a left main pulmonary artery embolus, which extended to the left interlobar pulmonary artery. Afterward, the patient initiated anticoagulation therapy. With preserved renal function he was able to continue his outpatient chemotherapy regimen.

Conclusion

This case highlights a safe imaging technique for emergency physicians to diagnose pulmonary embolus and subsequently guide anticoagulation therapy for patients in whom use of conventional contrast is contraindicated.

Improving Transplant Medication Safety Through a Technology and Pharmacist Intervention (ISTEP): Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Medication errors, adverse drug events, and nonadherence lead to increased health care utilization and increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes, including graft loss, in solid organ transplant recipients. Veterans living with organ transplants represent a population that is at substantial risk for medication safety events and fragmented care coordination issues. To improve medication safety and long-term clinical outcomes in veteran transplant patients, interventions should address interorganizational system failures and provider-level and patient-level factors.

Objective

This study aims to measure the clinical and economic effectiveness of a pharmacist-led, technology-enabled intervention, compared with usual care, in veteran organ transplant recipients.

Methods

This is a 24-month prospective, parallel-arm, cluster-randomized, controlled multicenter study. The pharmacist-led intervention uses an innovative dashboard system to improve medication safety and health outcomes, compared with usual posttransplant care. Pharmacists at 10 study sites will be consented into this study before undergoing randomization, and 5 sites will then be randomized to each study arm. Approximately, 1600 veteran transplant patients will be included in the assessment of the primary outcome across the 10 sites.

Results

This study is ongoing. Institutional review board approval was received in October 2018 and the study opened in March 2019. To date there are no findings from this study, as the delivery of the intervention is scheduled to occur over a 24-month period. The first results are expected to be submitted for publication in August 2021.

Conclusions

With this report, we describe the study design, methods, and outcome measures that will be used in this ongoing clinical trial. Successful completion of the Improving Transplant Medication Safety through a Technology and Pharmacist Intervention study will provide empirical evidence of the effectiveness of a feasible and scalable technology-enabled intervention on improving medication safety and costs.

Clinical Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03860818; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03860818

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/13821

Evaluation of the Renal Transplant Recipient in the Emergency Department

Renal transplants are becoming more and more frequent in the United States and worldwide. Studies demonstrate that these patients inevitably end up visiting an emergency department. In addition to typical medical and surgical problems encountered in the general population, this group of patients has unique problems arising from their immunocompromised state and also due to side effects of the medications required. This article discusses these risks and management decisions that the emergency department physician should be aware of in order to prevent adverse outcomes for the patient and transplanted kidney.

Approach to Transplant Infectious Diseases in the Emergency Department

The emergency department (ED) is an increasingly important site of care for patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation or hematopoietic cell transplantation. It is paramount for emergency physicians to recognize infections early on, obtain appropriate diagnostic testing, initiate empirical antimicrobial therapy, and consider specialty consultation and inpatient admission when caring for these patients. This review provides emergency physicians with an approach to the assessment of transplant patients' underlying risk for infection, formulation of a broad differential diagnosis, and initial management of transplant infectious disease emergencies in the ED.

Emergency department use among kidney transplant recipients in the United States

Patients with end-stage renal disease use the emergency department (ED) at a 6-fold higher rate than do other US adults. No national studies have described ED use rates among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients, and the factors associated with higher ED use. We examined a cohort of 132 725 adult KTx recipients in the United States Renal Data System (2005-2013). Data on ED visits, hospitalization, and outpatient nephrology visits were obtained from Medicare claims databases. Nearly half (46.1%) of KTx recipients had at least one ED visit (1.61 ED visits/patient-year [PY]), and 39.7% of ED visits resulted in hospitalization in the first year posttransplantation. ED visit rate was high in the first 30 days (5.26 visits/PY) but declined substantially thereafter (1.81 visits/PY in months 1-3; 1.13 visits/PY in months 3-12 posttransplantation). ED visit rates were higher in the first 30 days versus rates for dialysis patients but less than half the rate thereafter. Female sex, public insurance, medical comorbidities, longer pretransplantation dialysis vintage, and delayed graft function were associated with higher ED use in the first year post-KTx. Policies and strategies addressing potentially preventable ED visits should be promoted to help improve patient care and increase efficient use of ED resources.

Incidence and impact of adverse drug events contributing to hospital readmissions in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The incidence and impact of adverse drug events (ADEs) leading to hospitalization and as a predominant risk factor for late graft loss has not been studied in transplantation.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal cohort study of adult kidney recipients transplanted between 2005 and 2010 and followed through 2013. There were 3 cohorts: no readmissions, readmissions not due to an adverse drug event, and adverse drug events contributing to readmissions. The rationale of the adverse drug events contribution to the readmission was categorized in terms of probability, preventability, and severity.

RESULTS

A total of 837 patients with 963 hospital readmissions were included; 47.9% had at least one hospital readmission and 65.0% of readmissions were deemed as having an ADE contribute. The predominant causes of readmissions related to ADEs included non-opportunistic infections (39.6%), opportunistic infections (10.5%), rejection (18.1%), and acute kidney injury (11.8%). Over time, readmissions due to under-immunosuppression (rejection) significantly decreased (-1.6% per year), while those due to over-immunosuppression (infection, cancer, or cytopenias) significantly increased (2.1% increase per year [difference 3.7%, P = .026]). Delayed graft function, rejection, creatinine, graft loss, and death were all significantly greater in those with an ADE that contributed to a readmission compared the other two cohorts (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that ADEs may be associated with a significant increase in the risk of hospital readmission after kidney transplant and subsequent graft loss.

Assessment of risk factors for increased resource utilization in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

There are only a limited number of studies that have sought to identify patients at high risk for medication errors and subsequent adverse clinical outcomes. This study sought to identify risk factors for increased health care resource utilization in kidney transplant recipients based on drug-related problems and self-administered surveys.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, adult kidney transplant recipients seen in the transplant clinic between September and November 2015 were surveyed for self-reported demographics, medication adherence, and health status/outlook. Subsequently, patients were assessed for associations between survey results, pharmacist-derived drug-related problems, and health resource utilization over a minimum 6-mo follow-up period. Based on univariate associations, two risk cohorts were identified and compared for health care utilization using multivariable Poisson regression.

RESULTS

A total of 237 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 8 mo. From the patient survey data, Medicaid insured or self-rated poor health status were identified as a significant risk cohort. From pharmacist assessments, those who received incorrect medication or lacked appropriate follow-up medication monitoring were identified as a significant risk cohort (pharmacy errors). The Medicaid insured or self-rated poor health status cohort experienced 43% more total health care encounters (incident rate ratios [IRR] 1.43, 1.01-2.02) and 35% more transplant clinic visits (IRR 1.35, 1.03-1.77). The pharmacy errors cohort experienced 4.2 times the rate of total health care encounters (IRR 4.17, 1.55-11.2), 4.1 times the rate of hospital readmissions (IRR 4.09, 1.58-10.6), and 2.3 times the rate of transplant clinic visits (IRR 2.31, 1.04-5.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid insurance, self-rated poor health status, and errors in the medication regimen or monitoring were significant risk factors for increased health care utilization in kidney transplant recipients. Further research is warranted to validate these potential risk factors, determine the long-term impact on graft/patient survival, and assess the mutability of these risks through prospective identification and intervention.

Emergency Department Use among Patients with CKD: A Population-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although prior studies have observed high resource use among patients with CKD, there is limited exploration of emergency department use in this population and the proportion of encounters related to CKD care specifically.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We identified all adults (≥18 years old) with eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (including dialysis-dependent patients) in Alberta, Canada between April 1, 2010 and March 31, 2011. Patients with CKD were linked to administrative data to capture clinical characteristics and frequency of emergency department encounters and followed until death or end of study (March 31, 2013). Within each CKD category, we calculated adjusted rates of overall emergency department use as well as rates of potentially preventable emergency department encounters (defined by four CKD-specific ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: heart failure, hyperkalemia, volume overload, and malignant hypertension).

RESULTS

During mean follow-up of 2.4 years, 111,087 patients had 294,113 emergency department encounters; 64.2% of patients had category G3A CKD, and 1.6% were dialysis dependent. Adjusted rates of overall emergency department use were highest among patients with more advanced CKD; 5.8% of all emergency department encounters were for CKD-specific ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, with approximately one third resulting in hospital admission. Heart failure accounted for over 80% of all potentially preventable emergency department events among patients with categories G3A, G3B, and G4 CKD, whereas hyperkalemia accounted for almost one half (48%) of all ambulatory care-sensitive conditions among patients on dialysis. Adjusted rates of emergency department events for heart failure showed a U-shaped relationship, with the highest rates among patients with category G4 CKD. In contrast, there was a graded association between rates of emergency department use for hyperkalemia and CKD category.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency department use is high among patients with CKD, although only a small proportion of these encounters is for potentially preventable CKD-related care. Strategies to reduce emergency department use among patients with CKD will, therefore, need to target conditions other than CKD-specific ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.