1
|
Franca Gois PH, Saunderson RB, Wainstein M, Li CK, Damasiewicz MJ, Miao VY, Wolley M, Hepburn K, Mutatiri C, Chacko B, Bonner A, Healy H. Protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation clinical trial evaluating video-assisted electronic consent vs standard consent for patients initiating and continuing haemodialysis in Australia (eConsent HD). BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081181. [PMID: 38991670 PMCID: PMC11243118 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Communicating complex information about haemodialysis (HD) and ensuring it is well understood remains a challenge for clinicians. Informed consent is a high-impact checkpoint in augmenting patients' decision awareness and engagement prior to HD. The aims of this study are to (1) develop a digital information interface to better equip patients in the decision-making process to undergo HD; (2) evaluate the effectiveness of the co-designed digital information interface to improve patient outcomes; and (3) evaluate an implementation strategy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS First, a co-design process involving consumers and clinicians to develop audio-visual content for an innovative digital platform. Next a two-armed, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial will compare the digital interface to the current informed consent practice among adult HD patients (n=244). Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. Intervention group: Participants will be coached to an online platform that delivers a simple-to-understand animation and knowledge test questions prior to signing an electronic consent form. CONTROL GROUP Participants will be consented conventionally by a clinician and sign a paper consent form. Primary outcome is decision regret, with secondary outcomes including patient-reported experience, comprehension, anxiety, satisfaction, adherence to renal care, dialysis withdrawal, consent time and qualitative feedback. Implementation of eConsent for HD will be evaluated concurrently using the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) methodology. ANALYSIS For the randomised controlled trial, data will be analysed using intention-to-treat statistical methods. Descriptive statistics and CFIR-based analyses will inform implementation evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Human Research Ethics approval has been secured (Metro North Health Human Research Ethics Committee B, HREC/2022/MNHB/86890), and Dissemination will occur through partnerships with stakeholder and consumer groups, scientific meetings, publications and social media releases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001354774).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Henrique Franca Gois
- John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | | | | - Chenlei Kelly Li
- Department of Renal Medicine, Saint George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Vera Y Miao
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Wolley
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kirsten Hepburn
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Clyson Mutatiri
- Renal Medicine, Wide Bay Hospital and Health Service, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bobby Chacko
- John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ann Bonner
- Nursing, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Helen Healy
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davison SN, Rathwell S. Short-term and long-term survival in patients with prevalent haemodialysis-an integrated prognostic model: external validation. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 14:222-229. [PMID: 36596667 PMCID: PMC11103293 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prognostic tools with evidence for external validity in routine clinical practice are needed to align care with patients' preferences and deliver timely supportive services. Current models have limited, if any, evidence for external validity and none have been implemented and evaluated in clinical practice on a large scale. This study sought to provide evidence for external validity in a real life setting of the Cohen prognostic model that integrates actuarial factors with the 'Surprise Question' to assess 6-month, 12-month and 18-month survival of prevalent haemodialysis patients. METHODS Cross-sectional study of 1372 patients in a Canadian university-based programme between 2010 and 2019. Survival probabilities were compared with observed survival. Discrimination and calibration were assessed through predicted risk-stratified observed survival, cumulative AUC, Somer's Dxy and a calibration slope estimate. RESULTS Discrimination performance was moderate with a C statistic of 0.71-0.72 for all three time points. The model overpredicted mortality risk with the best predictive accuracy for 6- month survival. The differences between observed and mean predicted survival at 6 months, 12 months and 18 months were 3.2%, 8.8% and 12.9%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by Cox-based risk group showed good discrimination between high-risk and low-risk patients with HR estimates (95% CI): C2 vs C1 3.07 (1.57-5.99), C3 vs C1 5.85 (3.06-11.17), C4 vs C1 13.24 (6.91-25.34)). CONCLUSIONS The Cohen prognostic model can be incorporated easily into routine dialysis care to identify patients at high risk for death over 6 months, 12 months and 18 months and help target vulnerable patients for timely supportive care interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara N Davison
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sarah Rathwell
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dahm MR, Raine SE, Slade D, Chien LJ, Kennard A, Walters G, Spinks T, Talaulikar G. Older patients and dialysis shared decision-making. Insights from an ethnographic discourse analysis of interviews and clinical interactions. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 122:108124. [PMID: 38232671 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe and analyse the perspectives and communication practices of kidney clinicians and older patients (aged 60 +) during collaborative education and decision-making about dialysis. METHODS This qualitative study drew on pluralistic data sources and analytical approaches investigating elicited semi-structured interviews (n = 31) with doctors (n = 8), nurses (n = 8) and patients (n = 15), combined with ethnographic observations, written artefacts and audio-recorded naturally-occurring interactions (n = 23, education sessions n = 4; consultations n = 19) in a tertiary Australian kidney outpatient clinic. Data were analysed for themes and linguistic discourse features. RESULTS Five themes were identified across all data sources: 1) lost opportunity in education; 2) persistent disease knowledge gaps; 3) putting up with dialysis; 4) perceived and real involvement in decision-making and 5) complex role of family as decision-making brokers. CONCLUSION As the first study to complement interviews with evidence from naturally-occurring kidney interactions, this study balances the perspectives of how older patients and their clinicians view chronic kidney disease education, with how decision-making about dialysis is reflected in practice. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The study provides suggestions for contextualized, multi-perspectives formal and informal training for improving decision-making about dialysis, spanning from indications to boost communication efficiency, to reducing unexplained jargon, incorporating patient navigators and exploring different dialysis modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria R Dahm
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
| | - Suzanne Eggins Raine
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Diana Slade
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Laura J Chien
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Alice Kennard
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Giles Walters
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Tony Spinks
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
| | - Girish Talaulikar
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia; College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sampath R, Seshadri S, Phan T, Allen R, Duberstein PR, Saeed F. Uncovering Patient and Caregiver Goals for Goal-Concordant Care in Kidney Therapy Decisions. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2024:10499091241227242. [PMID: 38196280 PMCID: PMC11231053 DOI: 10.1177/10499091241227242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT In kidney therapy (KT) decisions, goal-concordant decision-making is recognized to be important, yet alignment with patients' goals during dialysis initiation is not always achieved. OBJECTIVES To explore older patients' and caregivers' hopes, goals, and fears related to KT and communication of these elements with members of their health care team. METHODS The study included patients aged ≥75 years with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤25 mL/min/1.73 m2 and their caregivers enrolled in a palliative care intervention for KT decision-making. Patients and caregivers were asked open-ended questions about their hopes, goals, and fears related to KT decisions. A survey assessed if patients shared their goals with members of their health care team. Qualitative data underwent content analysis, supplemented by demographic descriptive statistics. RESULTS The mean age of patients (n = 26) was 82.7 (±5.7) years, and caregivers (n = 15) had a mean age of 66.4 (±13.7) years. Among the participants, 13 patients and 11 caregivers were women, and 20 patients and 12 caregivers were White. Four themes emerged: (1) Maintaining things as good as they are by avoiding dialysis-related burdens; (2) seeking longevity while avoiding dialysis; (3) avoiding pain, symptoms, and body disfigurement; and (4) deferring decision-making. Patients rarely had shared their goals with the key members of their health care team. CONCLUSION Patients and caregivers prioritize maintaining quality of life, deferring decision-making regarding dialysis, and avoiding dialysis-related burdens. These goals are often unshared with their family and health care teams. Given our aging population, urgent action is needed to educate clinicians to actively explore and engage with patient goals in KT decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramya Sampath
- Department of Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sandhya Seshadri
- Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Tramanh Phan
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health, Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Fahad Saeed
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health, Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dahm MR, Raine SE, Slade D, Chien LJ, Kennard A, Walters G, Spinks T, Talaulikar G. Shared decision making in chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study of the impact of communication practices on treatment decisions for older patients. BMC Nephrol 2023; 24:383. [PMID: 38129771 PMCID: PMC10734071 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03406-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective interpersonal communication is critical for shared decision-making (SDM). Previous SDM communication training in nephrology has lacked context-specific evidence from ethnographic analysis of SDM interactions with older patients considering treatment options of end stage kidney disease (ESKD). This study explores communication strategies in SDM discussions in nephrology, specifically focusing on older patients considering dialysis as kidney replacement therapy (KRT). METHODS We conducted a qualitative study analysing naturally-occurring audio-recorded clinical interactions (n = 12) between Australian kidney doctors, patients aged 60+, and carers. Linguistic ethnography and qualitative socially-oriented functional approaches were used for analysis. RESULTS Two types of communication strategies emerged: (1) Managing and advancing treatment decisions: involving active checking of knowledge, clear explanations of options, and local issue resolution. (2) Pulling back: Deferring or delaying decisions through mixed messaging. Specifically for non-English speaking patients, pulling back was further characterised by communication challenges deferring decision-making including ineffective issue management, and reliance on family as interpreters. Age was not an explicit topic of discussion among participants when it came to making decisions about KRT but was highly relevant to treatment decision-making. Doctors appeared reluctant to broach non-dialysis conservative management, even when it appears clinically appropriate. Conservative care, an alternative to KRT suitable for older patients with co-morbidities, was only explicitly discussed when prompted by patients or carers. CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the impact of different communication strategies on SDM discussions in nephrology. This study calls for linguistic-informed contextualised communication training and provides foundational evidence for nephrology-specific communication skills training in SDM for KRT among older patients. There is urgent need for doctors to become confident and competent in discussing non-dialysis conservative management. Further international research should explore naturally-occurring SDM interactions in nephrology with other vulnerable groups to enhance evidence and training integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria R Dahm
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Baldessin Precinct Building, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
| | - Suzanne Eggins Raine
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Baldessin Precinct Building, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Diana Slade
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Baldessin Precinct Building, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Laura J Chien
- Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Baldessin Precinct Building, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Alice Kennard
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Giles Walters
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Tony Spinks
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
| | - Girish Talaulikar
- Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hamroun A, Glowacki F, Frimat L. Comprehensive conservative care: what doctors say, what patients hear. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2023; 38:2428-2443. [PMID: 37156527 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The demographic evolution of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) has led to the advent of an alternative treatment option to kidney replacement therapy in the past couple of decades. The KDIGO controversies on Kidney Supportive Care called this approach "comprehensive conservative care" (CCC) and defined it as planned holistic patient-centered care for patients with CKD stage 5 that does not include dialysis. Although the benefit of this treatment option is now well-recognized, especially for the elderly, and comorbid and frail patients, its development remains limited in practice. While shared decision-making and advance care planning represent the cornerstones of the CCC approach, one of the main barriers in its development is the perfectible communication between nephrologists and patients, but also between all healthcare professionals involved in the care of advanced CKD patients. As a result, a significant gap has opened up between what doctors say and what patients hear. Indeed, although CCC is reported by nephrologists to be widely available in their facilities, few of their patients say that they have actually heard of it. The objectives of this review are to explore discrepancies between what doctors say and what patients hear, to identify the factors underlying this gap, and to formulate practical proposals for narrowing this gap in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aghiles Hamroun
- Lille University, Lille University Hospital Center of Lille, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation, and Apheresis, Lille, France
- University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR1167 RID-AGE, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - François Glowacki
- Lille University, Lille University Hospital Center of Lille, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, Kidney Transplantation, and Apheresis, Lille, France
- University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Luc Frimat
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
- Inserm, CIC-1433 Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saeed F, Dahl S, Horowitz RK, Duberstein PR, Epstein RM, Fiscella KA, Allen RJ. Development and Acceptability of a Kidney Therapy Decision Aid for Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: A Design-Based Research Involving Patients, Caregivers, and a Multidisciplinary Team. Kidney Med 2023; 5:100671. [PMID: 37492114 PMCID: PMC10363565 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Many older adults prefer quality of life over longevity, and some prefer conservative kidney management (CKM) over dialysis. There is a lack of patient-decision aids for adults aged 75 years or older facing kidney therapy decisions, which not only include information on dialysis and CKM but also encourage end-of-life planning. We iteratively developed a paper-based patient-decision aid for older people with low literacy and conducted surveys to assess its acceptability. Study Design Design-based research. Setting and Participants Informed by design-based research principles and theory of behavioral activation, a multidisciplinary team of experts created a first version of the patient-decision aid containing 2 components: (1) educational material about kidney therapy options such as CKM, and (2) a question prompt list relevant to kidney therapy and end-of-life decision making. On the basis of the acceptability input of patients and caregivers, separate qualitative interviews of 35 people receiving maintenance dialysis, and with the independent feedback of educated layperson, we further modified the patient-decision aid to create a second version. Analytical Approach We used descriptive statistics to present the results of acceptability surveys and thematic content analyses for patients' qualitative interviews. Results The mean age of patients (n=21) who tested the patient-decision aid was 80 years and the mean age of caregivers (n=9) was 70 years. All respondents held positive views about the educational component and would recommend the educational component to others (100% patients and caregivers). Most of the patients reported that the question prompt list helped them put concerns into words (80% patients and 88% caregivers) and would recommend the question prompt list to others (95% patients and 100% caregivers). Limitations Single-center study. Conclusions Both components of the patient-decision aid received high acceptability ratings. We plan to launch a larger effectiveness study to test the outcomes of a decision-supporting intervention combining the patient-decision aid with palliative care-based decision coaching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Spencer Dahl
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Robert K. Horowitz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Paul R. Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Ronald M. Epstein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Kevin A. Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Rebecca J. Allen
- Mount St. Joseph University, School of Behavioral and Natural Sciences, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gelfand SL, Hentschel DM. Dialysis Access Considerations in Kidney Palliative Care. Semin Nephrol 2023; 43:151397. [PMID: 37579517 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
In this review, we discuss common challenges at the interface between dialysis access planning, prognostication, and patient-centered decision making. Particularly for patients whose survival benefit from dialysis is attenuated by advanced age or other serious illness, knowing the potential complications and anticipated frequency of access procedures is essential for patients and families to be able to conceptualize what life on dialysis will look like. Although starting dialysis with a functioning graft or fistula is associated with reduced infection rates, mortality, hospitalizations, and cost compared with a central venous catheter, these benefits must be weighed against the chance that early access placement in an elderly or seriously ill patient is an unnecessary surgery because the chronic kidney disease never progresses, the patient dies before developing an indication to start dialysis, or, the patient prefers conservative kidney management over dialysis. Kidney palliative care is a growing subspecialty of nephrology focused on helping seriously ill patients navigate complex medical decisions, and may be useful for intensive goals-of-care discussions about treatment and access options for patients with limited anticipated survival because of age or other serious illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha L Gelfand
- Department of Medicine, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA; Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Interventional Nephrology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Dirk M Hentschel
- Department of Medicine, Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA; Department of Medicine, Interventional Nephrology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li KC, Brown MA. Conservative Kidney Management: When, Why, and For Whom? Semin Nephrol 2023; 43:151395. [PMID: 37481807 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
Deciding between dialysis and conservative kidney management (CKM) in an elderly or seriously ill person with kidney failure is complex and requires shared decision making. Patients and families look to their nephrologist to provide an individualized recommendation that aligns with patient-centered goals. For a balanced and considered decision to be made, dialysis should not be the default and nephrologists need to be familiar with relevant prognostic information including survival, symptom burden, functional trajectory, and quality of life with dialysis and with CKM. CKM is a holistic, proactive, and multidisciplinary treatment for kidney failure. For some elderly comorbid patients, CKM improves symptom burden and aligns with quality-of-life goals, with modest or no loss of longevity. CKM can be provided by a nephrologist alone but ideally is managed through partnership with a dedicated supportive or palliative care service embedded within the nephrology practice. Treatment decisions are best discussed early in the disease trajectory and occur over many consultations, and nephrologists should be upskilled in communication to better support patients and families in these important conversations. Nephrologists should remain actively involved in their patients' care through to end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Chenlei Li
- Renal Department, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Mark Ashley Brown
- Renal Department, St George Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Silva O, Jaber D, Chiu A, Adams-Mardi C, Wicht E. Depression and Capacity to Withdraw from Dialysis. THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ETHICS 2022. [DOI: 10.1086/jce2022333240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
11
|
Saeed F, Moss AH, Duberstein PR, Fiscella KA. Enabling Patient Choice: The "Deciding Not to Decide" Option for Older Adults Facing Dialysis Decisions. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 33:880-882. [PMID: 35169067 PMCID: PMC9063883 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021081143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health, Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Alvin H Moss
- Sections of Nephrology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Paul R Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - Kevin A Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Allen RJ, Saeed F. Dialysis Organization Online Information on Kidney Failure Treatments: A Content Analysis Using Corpus Linguistics. Kidney Med 2022; 4:100462. [PMID: 35620083 PMCID: PMC9127690 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Dialysis organizations’ websites may influence patient decision making, but the websites have received almost no consideration. We investigated how/whether these websites present all kidney replacement therapy options and how the quality of life of these options is portrayed. Study Design Content analysis using corpus linguistics (computer-assisted language analysis). Setting Website content aimed at patients from the 2 major dialysis organizations’ websites, totaling 226,968 words. The analysis took place from November 12, 2020, to March 30, 2021. Analytical Approach We used linguistic software (AntConc) to document the frequencies of words needed to present treatment options and quality of life information. Results Over both sites, dialysis mentions outstripped transplantation mentions. Organization A did not appear to reference conservative kidney management. Organization B mentioned dialysis more often than conservative management, at a ratio of 34:1. Organization A did not attribute symptoms to dialysis, whereas organization B had 12 mentions of dialysis-induced symptoms out of 87 total symptom references. Both organizations framed life on dialysis optimistically, suggesting that patients can continue to engage in “work,” “sex,” or “travel”; organization A referenced sex, work, and/or travel 123 times and organization B referenced these 262 times. Limitations We used quantitative analysis and linked ideas with certain keywords. We did not conduct a detailed qualitative inquiry. Conclusions The websites emphasized dialysis as a treatment for kidney failure, and the quality of life on dialysis was framed very optimistically. Qualitative studies of treatment modalities and the quality of life on dialysis in the patient-targeted material of dialysis organizations are needed.
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen JHC, Lim WH, Howson P. Changing landscape of dialysis withdrawal in patients with kidney failure: Implications for clinical practice. Nephrology (Carlton) 2022; 27:551-565. [PMID: 35201646 PMCID: PMC9315017 DOI: 10.1111/nep.14032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Dialysis withdrawal has become an accepted treatment option for patients with kidney failure and is one of the leading causes of death in patients receiving dialysis in high-income countries. Despite its increasing acceptance, dialysis withdrawal currently lacks a clear, consistent definition. The processes and outcomes of dialysis withdrawal have wide temporal and geographical variability, attributed to dialysis patient selection, influence from cultural, religious and spiritual beliefs, and availability of kidney replacement therapy and conservative kidney management. As a complex, evolving process, dialysis withdrawal poses an enormous challenge for clinicians and healthcare teams with various limitations precluding a peaceful and smooth transition between active dialysis and end-of-life care. In this review, we examine the current definitions of dialysis withdrawal, the temporal and geographical patterns of dialysis withdrawal, international barriers in the decision-making process (including dialysis withdrawal during the COVID-19 pandemic), and gaps in the current dialysis withdrawal recommendations for clinical consideration and future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny H C Chen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Wai H Lim
- Department of Nephrology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Prue Howson
- Department of Nephrology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sledge R, Meyer D, Zubatsky M, Heiden-Rootes K, Philipneri M, Browne T. A Systematic Literature Review of Relational Autonomy in Dialysis Decision Making. HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK 2022; 47:53-61. [PMID: 34907445 DOI: 10.1093/hsw/hlab042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Nephrology interdisciplinary guidelines, professional codes of ethics, principle-based ethical standards, and literature promote patient autonomy and self-determination through shared decision making as ethical practice. Healthcare professionals are accountable for practice that is mindful of the impact of cultural diversity and community on the values and beliefs of the patient, an important part of shared decision making (SDM). Despite previous research regarding dialysis decision making, relational autonomy in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease SDM conversations is not well understood. This systematic literature review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework for identifying peer-reviewed literature on SDM for CKD. The findings were summarized into four broad themes: (1) promoting autonomy is a foundation of medical caring; (2) providers have a responsibility to respond to their asymmetrical social power; (3) autonomy is situated within the context of the patient; and (4) dialogue is a tool that negotiates clinical recommendations and patient goals. The caring practices of promoting autonomy with a dialogical resolution of a conflict acknowledging the interdependence of the parties and the patient's social-relational situatedness support a perspective of relational autonomy in dialysis decision-making practice and research.
Collapse
|
15
|
Carter C, Leanza F, Mohammed S, Upshur REG, Kontos P. A rapid scoping review of end-of-life conversations with frail older adults in Canada. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2021; 67:e298-e305. [PMID: 34772723 DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6711e298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore what is known about end-of-life (EOL) conversations with frail older adults across all settings including primary care in Canada, and to understand the barriers to, and recommendations for, EOL conversations. DATA SOURCES Comprehensive searches were conducted in CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), AgeLine (EBSCO), Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), and Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ProQuest). Searches used text words and subject headings (eg, MeSH, Emtree) related to 3 concepts: frailty, Canada, and EOL conversations. STUDY SELECTION Twenty-one English-language articles were selected (ie, 4 reviews, 10 commentaries, 3 quantitative studies, 3 qualitative studies, 1 mixed-methods study) that included information about EOL conversations with frail older adults in the Canadian health care context. SYNTHESIS In terms of having EOL conversations with frail older adults, this study found that many clinicians do not often and adequately discuss frailty and impending death with their older patients. Moreover, patients and their care partners do not have enough knowledge about frailty and death to make informed EOL decisions, leading to patients choosing more aggressive therapies instead of care focused on symptom management. In terms of barriers to EOL discussions, common barriers included a lack of trust between clinician and patient, inadequate EOL training for clinicians, and ineffective clinician communication with patients and families. Recommendations for improving EOL conversations include regular screening for frailty to prompt conversations about care and the use of an interprofessional approach. CONCLUSION More empirical research is needed that uses exploratory methods to shed light on the contextual factors that may act as a barrier to EOL conversations. More research is also needed on the roles and responsibilities of interprofessional teams in screening for frailty and engaging in EOL conversations. Moreover, there is a need to better understand how frail older patients and their families want EOL conversations to unfold and what best facilitates these conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celina Carter
- PhD candidate in the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto in Ontario.
| | - Francesco Leanza
- Family physician and Assistant Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Toronto
| | - Shan Mohammed
- Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream, in the Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing at the University of Toronto, and a faculty member in the Global Institute of Psychosocial, Palliative and End-of-Life Care, at the University Health Network in Toronto
| | - Ross E G Upshur
- Family physician and Professor in the Department of Family and Community Medicine and the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto, Head of the Division of Clinical Public Health at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, and Scientific Director of the Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation
| | - Pia Kontos
- Senior Scientist in the KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute at the University Health Network, and Professor in the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Saeed F, Shah AY, Allen RJ, Epstein RM, Fiscella KA. Communication principles and practices for making shared decisions about renal replacement therapy: a review of the literature. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2021; 30:507-515. [PMID: 34148978 PMCID: PMC8373782 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of the skill set required for communication and person-centered decision making for renal replacement therapy (RRT) choices, especially conservative kidney management (CKM). RECENT FINDINGS Research on communication and decision-making skills for shared RRT decision making is still in infancy. We adapt literature from other fields such as primary care and oncology for effective RRT decision making. SUMMARY We review seven key skills: (1) Announcing the need for decision making (2) Agenda Setting (3) Educating patients about RRT options (4) Discussing prognoses (5) Eliciting patient preferences (6) Responding to emotions and showing empathy, and (7) Investing in the end. We also provide example sentences to frame the conversations around RRT choices including CKM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Nephrology
- Division of Palliative Care
- University of Rochester School of Medicine, National University of Medical Sciences
| | - Amna Yousaf Shah
- Rawalpindi, Pakistan; CITE Center, Department of Behavioral and Natural Sciences
| | | | - Ronald M Epstein
- Division of Palliative Care
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Kevin A Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chen JHC, Brown MA, Jose M, Brennan F, Johnson DW, Roberts MA, Wong G, Cheikh Hassan H, Kennard A, Walker R, Davies CE, Boudville N, Borlace M, Hawley C, Lim WH. Temporal changes and risk factors of death from early withdrawal within 12 months of dialysis initiation - a cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 37:760-769. [PMID: 34175956 PMCID: PMC8951200 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfab207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mortality risk is high soon after dialysis initiation in patients with kidney failure, and dialysis withdrawal is a major cause of early mortality, attributed to psychosocial or medical reasons. The temporal trends and risk factors associated with cause-specific early dialysis withdrawal within 12 months of dialysis initiation remain uncertain. Methods Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we examined the temporal trends and risk factors associated with mortality attributed to early psychosocial and medical withdrawals in incident adult dialysis patients in Australia between 2005 and 2018 using adjusted competing risk analyses. Results Of 32 274 incident dialysis patients, 3390 (11%) experienced death within 12 months post-dialysis initiation. Of these, 1225 (36%) were attributed to dialysis withdrawal, with 484 (14%) psychosocial withdrawals and 741 (22%) medical withdrawals. These patterns remained unchanged over the past two decades. Factors associated with increased risk of death from early psychosocial and medical withdrawals were older age, dialysis via central venous catheter, late referral and the presence of cerebrovascular disease; obesity and Asian ethnicity were associated with decreased risk. Risk factors associated with early psychosocial withdrawals were underweight and higher socioeconomic status. Presence of peripheral vascular disease, chronic lung disease and cancers were associated with early medical withdrawals. Conclusions Death from dialysis withdrawal accounted for >30% of early deaths in kidney failure patients initiated on dialysis and remained unchanged over the past two decades. Several shared risk factors were observed between mortality attributed to early psychosocial and medical withdrawals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny H C Chen
- School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- Depatment of Renal Medicine, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia
- Correspondence to: Jenny H.C. Chen; E-mail:
| | - Mark A Brown
- Department of Nephrology, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew Jose
- School of Medicine, The University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia
| | - Frank Brennan
- Department of Nephrology, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Matthew A Roberts
- School of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Renal Service, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Hicham Cheikh Hassan
- School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- Depatment of Renal Medicine, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Alice Kennard
- School of Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
| | - Rachael Walker
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- School of Nursing, Eastern Institute of Technology, Napier, New Zealand
| | - Christopher E Davies
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Neil Boudville
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Monique Borlace
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Carmel Hawley
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Wai H Lim
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Amir N, McCarthy HJ, Tong A. A working partnership: A review of shared decision-making in nephrology. Nephrology (Carlton) 2021; 26:851-857. [PMID: 34010487 DOI: 10.1111/nep.13902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease are required to make difficult decisions, negotiating between the risks, burdens and benefits for any proposed course. This process can be extremely challenging, since these decisions involve inherent risks, which can impact on survival and quality of life. Shared decision-making offers a patient-centred approach in partnering with patients to make decisions about their treatment, which reflect their values and preferences. Shared decision-making can improve patient preparedness, motivation, satisfaction, and adherence to the treatment or decision agreed upon. In this review article, we outline the key principles of shared decision-making, and provide a framework with communication strategies to facilitate shared decision-making. We highlight the broad range and context of decisions faced by patients in several areas of nephrology care and discuss patient-important outcomes, priorities and motivations that underpin their decision-making. Preserving patient autonomy through shared decision-making ensures close consideration of patient preferences to enhance satisfaction with the decision reached and optimize outcomes important to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noa Amir
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hugh J McCarthy
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Parsons JA, Taylor DM, Caskey FJ, Ives J. Ethical Duties of Nephrologists: When Patients Are Nonadherent to Treatment. Semin Nephrol 2021; 41:262-271. [PMID: 34330366 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
When providing care, nephrologists are subject to various ethical duties. Beyond the Hippocratic notion of doing no harm, nephrologists also have duties to respect their patients' autonomy and dignity, to meet their patients' care goals in the least invasive way, to act impartially, and, ultimately, to do what is (clinically) beneficial for their patients. Juggling these often-conflicting duties can be challenging at the best of times, but can prove especially difficult when patients are not fully adherent to treatment. When a patient's nonadherence begins to cause harm to themselves and/or others, it may be questioned whether discontinuation of care is appropriate. We discuss how nephrologists can meet their ethical duties when faced with nonadherence in patients undergoing hemodialysis, including episodic extreme agitation, poor renal diet, missed hemodialysis sessions, and emergency presentations brought on by nonadherence. Furthermore, we consider the impact of cognitive impairment and provider-family conflict when making care decisions in a nonadherence context, as well as how the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic might affect responses to nonadherence. Suggestions are provided for ethically informed responses, prioritizing a patient-narrative approach that is attentive to patients' values and preferences, multidisciplinarity, and the use of behavioral contracts and/or technology where appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dominic M Taylor
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Renal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Fergus J Caskey
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Renal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan Ives
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Weaver MS, Alfandre DJ. Informed Consent by Any Other Name: Consent Processes for Emergency Use Authorization. J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 61:731-733. [PMID: 33645658 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Meaghann S Weaver
- VHA National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA.,University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - David J Alfandre
- VHA National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington, DC, USA.,NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Parsons JA, Ives J. Dialysis decisions concerning cognitively impaired adults: a scoping literature review. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:24. [PMID: 33663482 PMCID: PMC7932834 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00591-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic kidney disease is a significant cause of global deaths. Those who progress to end-stage kidney disease often commence dialysis as a life-extending treatment. For cognitively impaired patients, the decision as to whether they commence dialysis will fall to someone else. This scoping review was conducted to map existing literature pertaining to how decisions about dialysis are and should be made with, for, and on behalf of adult patients who lack decision-making capacity. In doing so, it forms the basis of a larger body of work that is exploring how these decisions ought to be made. Methods To identify relevant papers, searches were conducted on Ovid MEDLINE(R), Embase, PsychINFO, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were then applied, requiring that papers: report on empirical studies about how decisions about dialysis are made and/or discuss how decisions about dialysis should be made with, for, and on behalf of adult patients who lack decision-making capacity; be published from 1961 onwards; and be published in English. This resulted in 27 papers eligible for inclusion. Results Of note, the majority of papers originated in the United States. There was wide variation across the included papers. Extracted data were grouped under the following themes: involving various parties (patient involvement, family dominance, and wider communication); objectivity about care options (including difficulties with family detachment); cultural sensitivity; medical versus non-medical factors; managing nonadherent patients; and the role and prevalence of substituted judgement. The literature shows that there is inconsistency in the principles and processes surrounding decisions made about dialysis with, for, and on behalf of adult patients who lack decision-making capacity. Conclusions This scoping review demonstrates that there is significant variation in both the practice and theory of dialysis decision making with, for, and on behalf of cognitively impaired adult patients. Complexity arises in considering who should get a say, how influential their say should be in a decision, and what factors are most relevant to the decision. A lack of up-to-date literature exploring this issue is highlighted, with this scoping review providing a useful groundwork from which further research can be undertaken.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan A Parsons
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Jonathan Ives
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hoffmann U. [Treatment of geriatric patients with end-stage renal failure : Dialysis or conservative procedure?]. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2021; 54:223-228. [PMID: 33496833 DOI: 10.1007/s00391-021-01840-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Compared to younger patients, an acceptable state of health in older patients with various comorbidities is rarely achieved by the initiation of dialysis. Despite dialysis treatment, further functional and cognitive impairments often rapidly occur in geriatric patients. Thus, newer studies are concerned with the quality of life of this patient group after initiation of dialysis as well as with palliative treatment strategies as alternatives. A structured clarification for the patients on all possibilities with mediation of all necessary information is a prerequisite for a shared decision-making. To assess life expectancy after dialysis initiation, various scores have been developed but the sensitivity could not fulfil the expectations. In the case of renal replacement, chronic intermittent hemodialysis is the treatment form most frequently performed in geriatric patients. The main concern of conservative palliative treatment is the quality of life and the management of uremic symptoms, which have to be addressed by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ute Hoffmann
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Geriatrie/Angiologie, Diabetologie, Endokrinologie, Nephrologie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Prüfeninger Str. 86, 93049, Regensburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Carter C, Mohammed S, Upshur R, Kontos P. Biomedicalization of end-of-life conversations with medically frail older adults - Malleable and senescent bodies. Soc Sci Med 2020; 291:113428. [PMID: 34756384 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The common practice of delaying and/or avoiding end-of-life conversations with medically frail older adults is an important clinical issue. Most research investigating this practice focuses on clinician training and developing conversation skills. Little is known about the socio-political factors shaping the phenomenon of end-of-life conversations between clinicians and medically frail older patients. Using the critical lens of biomedicalization we consider how two dominant discourses, successful aging and frailty, and subsequent constructions of bodies as malleable or senescent, shape patient subjectivities and influence normative expectations about appropriate healthcare conversations and the consumption of biomedicine for medically frail adults. We highlight the uneven ways medically frail older adults are clinically positioned as successful or frail agers and briefly discuss how gender, class, and race may impact this tension and ambiguity. We conclude by arguing that end-of-life conversations with medically frail older adults is constrained by the pervasiveness of the successful aging discourse and the tendency within medical institutions to construct older bodies as malleable and in need of medical intervention to promote health and longevity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celina Carter
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 550 College St, Toronto, ON, M6G 1B1, Canada.
| | - Shan Mohammed
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Ross Upshur
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Pia Kontos
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada; KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Saeed F, Ladwig SA, Epstein RM, Monk RD, Duberstein PR. Dialysis Regret: Prevalence and Correlates. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:957-963. [PMID: 32499230 PMCID: PMC7341783 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.13781119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although some patients regret the decision to start dialysis, modifiable factors associated with regret have rarely been studied. We aimed to identify factors associated with patients' regret to initiate dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS A 41-item questionnaire was administered to adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis in seven dialysis units located in Cleveland, Ohio, and its suburbs. Of the 450 patients asked to participate in the study, 423 agreed and 397 provided data on decisional regret. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of regret, which was assessed using a single item, "Do you regret your decision to start dialysis?" We report adjusted odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the following candidate predictors: knowledge of CKD, attitudes toward CKD treatment, and preference for end-of-life care. RESULTS Eighty-two of 397 respondents (21%) reported decisional regret. There were no significant demographic correlates of regret. Regret was more common when patients reported choosing dialysis to please doctors or family members (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.31; P<0.001). Patients who reported having a prognostic discussion about life expectancy with their doctors (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.98; P=0.03) and those who had completed a living will (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.95; P=0.03) were less likely to report regret with dialysis initiation. CONCLUSIONS Dialysis regret was common in this sample. Demographic factors (age, sex, marital status, race, or educational attainment) were not significantly associated with regret, but modifiable care processes were. PODCAST This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2020_06_09_CJN13781119.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Department of Medicine, School of Public Health, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Susan A. Ladwig
- Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Ronald M. Epstein
- Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
- Departments of Psychiatry and Family Medicine, and Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Rebeca D. Monk
- Department of Medicine, School of Public Health, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Paul R. Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pyart R, Aggett J, Goodland A, Jones H, Prichard A, Pugh J, Thomas N, Roberts G. Exploring the choices and outcomes of older patients with advanced kidney disease. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234309. [PMID: 32520955 PMCID: PMC7286495 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
A lack of data on patient choices and outcomes at the time of pre-dialysis planning limits meaningful shared decision making, particularly in older frailer patients. In this large retrospective cohort study of patients aged over 70 seen by the pre-dialysis clinic (2004–2016) of a large single centre in the United Kingdom (1,216 patients), age, sex, comorbidity, poverty and frailty were used to predict choice of renal replacement therapy (RRT) over maximum conservative management (MCM). The impact of patient choice of RRT versus MCM was used to predict survival from the time of choice using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Older age, female sex, greater poverty and greater frailty were associated with choosing MCM, whilst comorbidity had no significant impact on choice. At 5 years of follow up, 49% of all patients had died without receiving RRT. Over 70% of the patients choosing MCM died with better kidney function than the median level at which those starting RRT initiated treatment. Frailty and age were better predictors of survival than comorbidity and in patients with at least moderate frailty, RRT offered no survival benefit over MCM. In conclusion, analysing outcomes from the time of choice may improve shared decision making. Frailty should be routinely assessed and collected and further work may help predict which patients are unlikely to survive or progress to end stage renal disease and may not need to be burdened with making a pre-dialysis choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhodri Pyart
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Justine Aggett
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Annwen Goodland
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley Jones
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Prichard
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Pugh
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Nerys Thomas
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Roberts
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Li KC, Brown MA. Consenting for Dialysis or Its Alternative: Systematic Process Is Needed. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15:560-562. [PMID: 32019760 PMCID: PMC7133135 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.09510819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Chenlei Li
- Department of Nephrology, St. George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and
| | - Mark A. Brown
- Department of Nephrology, St. George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and
- University of New South Wales, School of Medicine, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Davison SN. Conservative Kidney Management: Caring for Patients Unlikely to Benefit From Dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75:153-154. [DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
28
|
Meredyth NA, de Melo-Martin I. (Under)Valuing Surgical Informed Consent. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 230:257-262. [PMID: 31622768 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A Meredyth
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Ethics, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Surgery, Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Loh KP, Mohile SG, Lund JL, Epstein R, Lei L, Culakova E, McHugh C, Wells M, Gilmore N, Mohamed MR, Kamen C, Aarne V, Conlin A, Bearden J, Onitilo A, Wittink M, Dale W, Hurria A, Duberstein P. Beliefs About Advanced Cancer Curability in Older Patients, Their Caregivers, and Oncologists. Oncologist 2019; 24:e292-e302. [PMID: 31015317 PMCID: PMC6656513 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ensuring older patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists have similar beliefs about curability is important. We investigated discordance in beliefs about curability in patient-oncologist and caregiver-oncologist dyads. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used baseline data from a cluster randomized trial assessing whether geriatric assessment improves communication and quality of life in older patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Patients were aged ≥70 years with incurable cancer from community oncology practices. Patients, caregivers, and oncologists were asked: "What do you believe are the chances the cancer will go away and never come back with treatment?" Options were 100%, >50%, 50/50, <50%, and 0% (5-point scale). Discordance in beliefs about curability was defined as any difference in scale scores (≥3 points were severe). We used multivariate logistic regressions to describe correlates of discordance. RESULTS Discordance was present in 60% (15% severe) of the 336 patient-oncologist dyads and 52% (16% severe) of the 245 caregiver-oncologist dyads. Discordance was less common in patient-oncologist dyads when oncologists practiced longer (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.97) and more common in non-Hispanic white patients (AOR 5.77, CI 1.90-17.50) and when patients had lung (AOR 1.95, CI 1.29-2.94) or gastrointestinal (AOR 1.55, CI 1.09-2.21) compared with breast cancer. Severe discordance was more common when patients were non-Hispanic white, had lower income, and had impaired social support. Caregiver-oncologist discordance was more common when caregivers were non-Hispanic white (AOR 3.32, CI 1.01-10.94) and reported lower physical health (AOR 0.88, CI 0.78-1.00). Severe discordance was more common when caregivers had lower income and lower anxiety level. CONCLUSION Discordance in beliefs about curability is common, occasionally severe, and correlated with patient, caregiver, and oncologist characteristics. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Ensuring older patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers have similar beliefs about curability as the oncologist is important. This study investigated discordance in beliefs about curability in patient-oncologist (PO) and caregiver-oncologist (CO) dyads. It found that discordance was present in 60% (15% severe) of PO dyads and 52% (16% severe) of CO dyads, raising serious questions about the process by which patients consent to treatment. This study supports the need for interventions targeted at the oncologist, patient, caregiver, and societal levels to improve the delivery of prognostic information and patients'/caregivers' understanding and acceptance of prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kah Poh Loh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer L Lund
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ronald Epstein
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Lianlian Lei
- Department of Public Health Services, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Eva Culakova
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Colin McHugh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Megan Wells
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Nikesha Gilmore
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Mostafa R Mohamed
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Charles Kamen
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Valerie Aarne
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Alison Conlin
- Pacific Cancer Research Consortium NCORP, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - James Bearden
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium NCORP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Marsha Wittink
- Department of Psychiatry, Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - William Dale
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Arti Hurria
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Paul Duberstein
- Department of Psychiatry, Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
- Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Choi IS, Choi EY, Lee IH. Challenges in informed consent decision-making in Korean clinical research: A participant perspective. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0216889. [PMID: 31120918 PMCID: PMC6532870 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study investigated how the essential elements of informed consent are realised during the consent process and examined the challenges in obtaining genuine informed consent in Korea. Methods Through purposive sampling, we recruited 21 subjects from those participating in anticancer drug research since 2013. We undertook 1:1 in-depth interviews and analysed the data by framework analysis. Results Themes raised throughout the interviews were categorised into ‘disclosure’ and ‘understanding’ of clinical information and ‘decision’. Provider-centred information, both verbal and written, was delivered to each participant. There were few tools that the research staff might evaluate study participants’ level of understanding of the provided information during the clinical trial. Although participants did not understand basic clinical trial concepts as much as desired, they may not seek to solve difficulties through communication with trial researchers. Doubts were raised about whether participants had sufficient capacity and free will to provide informed consent. Conclusion There is a concern that informed consent can fall short of genuine in Korea. To ensure informed consent meets the international standard, greater efforts should be made to establish an explicit standard operational protocol for obtaining informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Im-Soon Choi
- Department of Pharmacy, Kyungpook National University Medical Centre, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Eun Young Choi
- College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, South Korea
- Department of Pharmacy, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, South Korea
| | - Iyn-Hyang Lee
- College of Pharmacy, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, South Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sturgill D, Bear A. Unique palliative care needs of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease - the scope of the problem and several solutions. Clin Med (Lond) 2019; 19:26-29. [PMID: 30651241 PMCID: PMC6399628 DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-1-26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), including end-stage renal disease (ESRD), have a life-threatening illness complicated by high morbidity and mortality and, therefore, should be suitable candidates for early intervention by palliative care specialists. However, the average patient with CKD does not have an advanced care plan, has multiple debilitating symptoms, and does not utilise hospice care at the end of life. In this review, we outline the scope of the problem of unmet palliative care needs for patients with advanced CKD and ESRD, barriers to improving palliative care for patients with renal failure, and possible future directions for palliative nephrology.
Collapse
|
32
|
Kurella Tamura M, Desai M, Kapphahn KI, Thomas IC, Asch SM, Chertow GM. Dialysis versus Medical Management at Different Ages and Levels of Kidney Function in Veterans with Advanced CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29:2169-2177. [PMID: 29789430 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2017121273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Appropriate patient selection and optimal timing of dialysis initiation among older adults with advanced CKD are uncertain. We determined the association between dialysis versus medical management and survival at different ages and levels of kidney function.Methods We assembled a nationally representative 20% sample of United States veterans with eGFR<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 between 2005 and 2010 (n=73,349), with follow-up through 2012. We used an extended Cox model to determine associations among the time-varying exposures, age (<65, 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years), eGFR (<6, 6-<9, 9-<12, 12-<15, and 15-<29 ml/min per 1.73 m2), and provision of dialysis, and survival.Result Over the mean±SEM follow-up of 3.4±2.2 years, 15% of patients started dialysis and 52% died. The eGFR at which dialysis, compared with medical management, associated with lower mortality varied by age (P<0.001). For patients aged <65, 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years, dialysis associated with lower mortality for those with eGFR not exceeding 6-<9, <6, 9-<12, and 9-<12 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Dialysis initiation at eGFR<6 ml/min per 1.73 m2 associated with a higher median life expectancy of 26, 25, and 19 months for patients aged 65, 75, and 85 years, respectively. When dialysis was initiated at eGFR 9-<12 ml/min per 1.73 m2, the estimated difference in median life expectancy was <1 year for these patients.Conclusions Provision of dialysis at higher levels of kidney function may extend survival for some older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Manisha Desai
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Kristopher I Kapphahn
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - I-Chun Thomas
- Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center and.,Division of Nephrology and
| | - Steven M Asch
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California; and
| | | |
Collapse
|