Deceased-Donor Acute Kidney Injury and BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Impact of Deceased-donor Acute Kidney Injury on Kidney Transplantation

Even as record numbers of deceased donors are undergoing organ recovery, the global transplant community continues to struggle with a shortage of donor organs and a high organ discard rate. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in many hospitalized patients, including up to 25% of patients in critical condition. Registry studies have shown a significant increase in nonrecovery or organ discard rates in AKI donors, despite most studies reporting similar clinical outcomes compared with non-AKI donors. This review aims to capture the salient information learned from these studies and to summarize the efforts that have been made to gain a more granular understanding of how kidneys from donors with AKI behave posttransplant. In particular, we reviewed the studies that analyzed the clinical outcomes in different stages of AKI and AKI in marginal donors, such as kidney donor profile index of >85%, older donors, and donation after circulatory death donors. We summarized studies investigating molecular biomarkers, transcriptomics, and possible future therapeutic targets for postdonation AKI.

BK polyomavirus infection: more than 50 years and still a threat to kidney transplant recipients

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a ubiquitous human polyomavirus and a major infection after kidney transplantation, primarily due to immunosuppression. BKPyV reactivation can manifest as viruria in 30%-40%, viremia in 10%-20%, and BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in 1%-10% of recipients. BKPyVAN is an important cause of kidney graft failure. Although the first case of BKPyV was identified in 1971, progress in its management has been limited. Specifically, there is no safe and effective antiviral agent or vaccine to treat or prevent the infection. Even in the current era, the mainstay approach to BKPyV is a reduction in immunosuppression, which is also limited by safety (risk of de novo donor specific antibody and rejection) and efficacy (graft failure). However, recently BKPyV has been getting more attention in the field, and some new treatment strategies including the utilization of viral-specific T-cell therapy are emerging. Given all these challenges, the primary focus of this article is complications associated with BKPyV, as well as strategies to mitigate negative outcomes.

Deceased-Donor Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter Cohort

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Donor acute kidney injury (AKI) activates innate immunity, enhances HLA expression in the kidney allograft, and provokes recipient alloimmune responses. We hypothesized that injury and inflammation that manifested in deceased-donor urine biomarkers would be associated with higher rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and allograft failure after transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

862 deceased donors for 1,137 kidney recipients at 13 centers.

EXPOSURES

We measured concentrations of interleukin 18 (IL-18), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in deceased donor urine. We also used the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria to assess donor clinical AKI.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was a composite of BPAR and graft failure (not from death). A secondary outcome was the composite of BPAR, graft failure, and/or de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA). Outcomes were ascertained in the first posttransplant year.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Multivariable Fine-Gray models with death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Mean recipient age was 54 ± 13 (SD) years, and 82% received antithymocyte globulin. We found no significant associations between donor urinary IL-18, KIM-1, and NGAL and the primary outcome (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR] for highest vs lowest tertile of 0.76 [95% CI, 0.45-1.28], 1.20 [95% CI, 0.69-2.07], and 1.14 [95% CI, 0.71-1.84], respectively). In secondary analyses, we detected no significant associations between clinically defined AKI and the primary outcome or between donor biomarkers and the composite outcome of BPAR, graft failure, and/or de novo DSA.

LIMITATIONS

BPAR was ascertained through for-cause biopsies, not surveillance biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of kidney recipients who almost all received induction with thymoglobulin, donor injury biomarkers were associated with neither graft failure and rejection nor a secondary outcome that included de novo DSA. These findings provide some reassurance that centers can successfully manage immunological complications using deceased-donor kidneys with AKI.