1
|
Szakály Z, Kovács B, Szakály M, T. Nagy-Pető D, Popovics P, Kiss M. Consumer acceptance of genetic-based personalized nutrition in Hungary. GENES & NUTRITION 2021; 16:3. [PMID: 33648454 PMCID: PMC7923598 DOI: 10.1186/s12263-021-00683-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the increasing number of personalized nutrition services available on the market, nutrigenomics-based level of personalization is still the exception rather than a mainstream activity. This can be partly explained by various factors of consumer acceptance of the new technology. While consumer attitudes toward genetic tests aiming to reveal the risks of a predisposition to various illnesses have already been examined by several research studies worldwide; consumer acceptance of nutrigenomics-based personalized nutrition has only been examined by a significantly lower number of papers, especially in the Central and Eastern European region. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this paper is to examine consumer acceptance of genetic-based personalized nutrition in Hungary. Therefore a national representative survey was conducted involving 1000 individuals. The starting point of the model used is the assumption that the consumer acceptance of personalized nutrition is influenced by its consumer perceptions, which are affected by psychological processes that, in a more general sense, determine acceptance of food innovations. RESULTS The results show that 23.5% of respondents accept genetic test-based personalized nutrition. Women were found to reject the new technology in a significantly smaller proportion than men. The relationship between other demographic variables (i.e. age groups, education and subjective income level) and the perception of genetic-based personalized nutrition is also significant. Our results indicate that it is perceived cost/benefit that is most strongly related to genetically based personalized dietary preferences, followed by perceived risk and subjective norms. Perceived uncertainty and perceived behavioural control, however, have only a weak relationship with genetic-based personalized dietary preferences. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the magnitude of the effect of socio-demographic criteria, it can be concluded that, on the whole, psychological processes in the individual have a greater influence on the development of preferences for genetic-based personalized nutrition than any socio-demographic factor. This also confirms the trend that there are more and more value-added products or value propositions (where a significant part of the value added is to be found in product innovation), for which psychological characteristics are/should be given more emphasis among the segmentation criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Szakály
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Bence Kovács
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Márk Szakály
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Dorka T. Nagy-Pető
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Péter Popovics
- Institute of Applied Economics Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Marietta Kiss
- Institute of Marketing and Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Press DJ, Aschebrook-Kilfoy B, Lauderdale D, Stepniak E, Gomez SL, Johnson EP, Gopalakrishnan R, Smieliauskas F, Hedeker D, Bettencourt L, Anselin L, Ahsan H. ChicagO Multiethnic Prevention and Surveillance Study (COMPASS): Increased Response Rates Among African American Residents in Low Socioeconomic Status Neighborhoods. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2021; 8:186-198. [PMID: 32542493 PMCID: PMC7736119 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-020-00770-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
African American (AA) populations experience persistent health disparities in the USA. Low representation in bio-specimen research precludes stratified analyses and creates challenges in studying health outcomes among AA populations. Previous studies examining determinants of bio-specimen research participation among minority participants have focused on individual-level barriers and facilitators. Neighborhood-level contextual factors may also inform bio-specimen research participation, possibly through social norms and the influence of social views and behaviors on neighbor's perspectives. We conducted an epidemiological study of residents in 5108 Chicago addresses to examine determinants of bio-specimen research participation among predominantly AA participants solicited for participation in the first 6 years of ChicagO Multiethnic Prevention and Surveillance Study (COMPASS). We used a door-to-door recruitment strategy by interviewers of predominantly minority race and ethnicity. Participants were compensated with a $50 gift card. We achieved response rates of 30.4% for non-AA addresses and 58.0% for AA addresses, with as high as 80.3% response among AA addresses in low socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhoods. After multivariable adjustment, we found approximately 3 times the odds of study participation among predominantly AA addresses in low vs. average SES neighborhoods (odds ratio (OR) = 3.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.20-4.24). Conversely, for non-AA addresses, we observed no difference in the odds of study participation in low vs. average SES neighborhoods (OR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.69-1.14) after multivariable adjustment. Our findings suggest that AA participants in low SES neighborhoods may be recruited for bio-specimen research through door-to-door approaches with compensation. Future studies may elucidate best practices to improve bio-specimen research participation among minority populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Press
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago Biological Sciences, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2000, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
- The Center for Health Information Partnerships (CHiP), Institute of Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago Biological Sciences, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2000, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Diane Lauderdale
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago Biological Sciences, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2000, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Elizabeth Stepniak
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago Biological Sciences, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2000, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Scarlett Lin Gomez
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Fabrice Smieliauskas
- Department of Economics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Donald Hedeker
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago Biological Sciences, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2000, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Luís Bettencourt
- Mansueto Institute for Urban Innovation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA
| | - Luc Anselin
- Center for Spatial Data Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Habibul Ahsan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago Biological Sciences, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC2000, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
- Institute for Population and Precision Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fadda M, Jobin A, Blasimme A, Greshake Tzovaras B, Price Ball M, Vayena E. User Perspectives of a Web-Based Data-Sharing Platform (Open Humans) on Ethical Oversight in Participant-Led Research: Protocol for a Quantitative Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2018; 7:e10939. [PMID: 30487120 PMCID: PMC6291678 DOI: 10.2196/10939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in medicine rely to a great extent on people's willingness to share their data with researchers. With increasingly widespread use of digital technologies, several Web-based communities have emerged aiming to enable their users to share large amounts of data, some of which can possibly be employed for research purposes by scientists, or to conduct participant-led research (PLR). Scholarship has recently addressed the necessity of interrogating how existing ethical standards can and should be applied and adapted in view of the specificities of such Web-based activities. So far, no study has explored participants' beliefs about and attitudes toward ethical oversight when it comes to platforms that involve medical data sharing. OBJECTIVE This paper presents the protocol for a survey study aimed at understanding users' beliefs about Web-based data-sharing platforms regarding how research ethics principles should be applied in such a setting. Furthermore, the study aims at quantitatively assessing the relationship between participants' perspectives on ethical oversight and other variables such as previous participation in research, beliefs about data sharing, and attitudes toward self-experimentation. METHODS We are conducting a Web-based survey with users of a popular Web-based data-sharing platform, Open Humans. The survey has been sent to approximately 4640 users registered for the Open Humans newsletter. To fill out the survey, participants need to have an account on Open Humans. We expect a 5%-10% response rate (between 200 and 400 completed surveys out of approximately 4000 survey invitations sent). Independent variables include past data-sharing behavior and intention, beliefs about data sharing, past participation in research, attitudes toward self-experimentation, perceived knowledge of the platform's guidelines and terms, perceived importance of having transparent guidelines, and governance-related beliefs. The main dependent variable is participants' expectations regarding who should ensure that ethical requirements are met within research projects conducted on open data-sharing platforms, based on Emanuel et al's ethical framework. We will use chi-square tests to assess the relationship between participants' expectations regarding ethical oversight and their past behavior, future intentions, beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge. RESULTS Data collection started on June 13, 2018. A reminder to fill out the survey was sent to participants in mid-July. We expect to gain insights on users' perspectives on the ethical oversight of Web-based data-sharing platforms and on the associated experiences, beliefs, and sociodemographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS When digital tools allow people to engage in PLR including medical data, understanding how people interpret and envision the ethical oversight of their data-sharing practices is crucial. This will be the first study to explore users' perspectives on ethical oversight of Web-based data-sharing platforms. The results will help inform the development of a framework that can be employed for platforms hosting various kinds of research projects to accommodate participants' ethical oversight needs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/10939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Fadda
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anna Jobin
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Blasimme
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bastian Greshake Tzovaras
- Open Humans Foundation, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | | | - Effy Vayena
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roessler BJ, Steneck NH, Connally L. The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository Development. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2015; 10:37-48. [PMID: 25742665 DOI: 10.1177/1556264614564975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we report on an effort to study the development and usefulness of a large, broad-use, opt-in biorepository for genomic research, focusing on three ethical issues: providing appropriate understanding, recruiting in ways that do not comprise autonomous decisions, and assessing costs versus benefits. We conclude the following: (a) Understanding can be improved by separating the task of informing subjects from documenting informed consent (Common Rule) and permission to use personal health information and samples for research (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA]); however, regulations might have to be changed to accommodate this approach. (b) Changing recruiting methods increases efficiency but can interfere with subject autonomy. (c) Finally, we propose a framework for the objective evaluation of the utility of biorepositories and suggest that more attention needs to be paid to use and sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake J Roessler
- Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Nicholas H Steneck
- Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Department of History, College of Literature, Science and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lisa Connally
- Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR), University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Promoting healthy dietary behaviour through personalised nutrition: technology push or technology pull? Proc Nutr Soc 2014; 74:171-6. [PMID: 25342299 DOI: 10.1017/s0029665114001529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The notion of educating the public through generic healthy eating messages has pervaded dietary health promotion efforts over the years and continues to do so through various media, despite little evidence for any enduring impact upon eating behaviour. There is growing evidence, however, that tailored interventions such as those that could be delivered online can be effective in bringing about healthy dietary behaviour change. The present paper brings together evidence from qualitative and quantitative studies that have considered the public perspective of genomics, nutrigenomics and personalised nutrition, including those conducted as part of the EU-funded Food4Me project. Such studies have consistently indicated that although the public hold positive views about nutrigenomics and personalised nutrition, they have reservations about the service providers' ability to ensure the secure handling of health data. Technological innovation has driven the concept of personalised nutrition forward and now a further technological leap is required to ensure the privacy of online service delivery systems and to protect data gathered in the process of designing personalised nutrition therapies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hagiwara N, Berry-Bobovski L, Francis C, Ramsey L, Chapman RA, Albrecht TL. Unexpected findings in the exploration of African American underrepresentation in biospecimen collection and biobanks. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2014; 29:580-587. [PMID: 24243440 PMCID: PMC4026340 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0586-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Racial/ethnic minorities are underrepresented in current biobanking programs. The current study utilized community-based participatory research to identify motivating factors and barriers that affect older African Americans' willingness to donate biospecimens. The standardized phone survey was administered to 78 African Americans who are 55 years old or older and live in the metropolitan Detroit area to assess their overall willingness to donate biospecimens and what factors were associated with it. The majority of the participants were willing to donate biospecimens, along with their personal information, for medical research and indicated that they did donate biospecimens when they were asked. However, African Americans were rarely asked to participate in biobanking programs. Furthermore, African Americans were not as concerned with research exploitation or as mistrusting of medical researchers as previously thought by the medical researchers. Even if African Americans were concerned over potential research exploitation or mistrust of medical researchers, these concerns or mistrust did not translate into an actual unwillingness to participate in biobanking programs. Rather, transparency in medical research and biobanking programs was more important when predicting African Americans' willingness to donate biospecimens for medical research. The findings suggest that underrepresentation of African Americans in current biobanking programs may not be due to their willingness/unwillingness to participate in such programs but rather due to a failure of medical researchers to approach them. Additionally, researchers and clinicians should focus on increasing the transparency of medical research and biobanking programs rather than changing African Americans' potential negative attitudes toward them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nao Hagiwara
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 808 West Franklin Street, P.O. Box, 842018, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gourna EG, Armstrong N, Wallace SE. Incidental findings from clinical sequencing in Greece: reporting experts' attitudes. J Community Genet 2014; 5:383-93. [PMID: 25048384 PMCID: PMC4159477 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-014-0194-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2014] [Accepted: 07/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Unprecedented progress in sequencing technologies and decreasing cost have brought genomic testing into the clinical setting. At the same time, the debate in the literature concerning the return of incidental findings (IFs) has made this an important issue internationally. These developments reflect a shift in genetics that will also affect smaller countries, such as Greece, that are just starting to implement these technologies and may look to other countries for examples of good practice. Ten in-depth interviews were conducted with Greek experts in clinical sequencing. Previous experiences and attitudes toward IFs and clinical sequencing were investigated as well as views on the existing policy regarding managing genetic information generated through testing. . Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. All participants reported the lack of any legal or other supportive mechanism. IFs are currently managed at a “local” level, i.e. within the clinic or the laboratory in an ad hoc way. All participants thought that clinically valid and actionable IFs should be returned, but always with caution and in respect to patients’ wishes, although several experts reported returning IFs according to their clinical discretion. Experts reported that most patients ask for all tests available but they felt that more counselling is needed to understand and manage genetic information. Due to the lack of any supporting mechanisms, professionals in Greece, even those with established experience in the field of genetic and genomic testing, have difficulties dealing with IFs. All experts agreed that it is now time, before the full integration of genomic testing into everyday clinical practice, for guidance to help Greek physicians work with patients and their families when IFs are discovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E G Gourna
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Adrian Building, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Williams PH, Nemeth LS, Sanner JE, Frazier LQ. Thematic analysis of cardiac care patients' explanations for declining contribution to a genomic research-based biobank. Am J Crit Care 2013; 22:320-7. [PMID: 23817821 DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2013838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care delivery systems increasingly ask patients to contribute biological samples for future genomic-based health research during critical care admissions, as the result of genome-based research requirements of unprecedented large sample sizes. Few reports describe patients' perceptions and responses to actual biobanking approaches in clinical settings. A qualitative study was conducted to explore 568 cardiac care patients' explanations of why they declined to contribute their samples to a future genomic research biobank. OBJECTIVES To (1) identify themes emerging from explanations for declining contribution to the research biobanking initiative and (2) determine how the content informs the stewardship conceptual framework that addresses evidence-based clinical ethics practices in genomic and genetic research biobanking. METHODS This qualitative study used an analytic method that combines inductive and deductive approaches to identify themes in patients' explanations for declining to contribute to a research biobank initiative. The hybrid design has relevance to health services research that seeks to develop taxonomy, themes, and theory. RESULTS Inductive approaches showed that themes of intrusion and autonomy dominated explanations. Deductive approaches affirmed previously proposed elements of a stewardship conceptual framework that addresses ethics in biobanking. CONCLUSION Research in understanding patients' perceptions can guide nursing and biobank practices in developing best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Holtzclaw Williams
- Pamela Holtzclaw Williams is an assistant professor and Lynne S. Nemeth is an associate professor in the College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. Jennifer E. Sanner is an assistant professor at the Houston School of Nursing: Center for Nursing Research at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Lorraine Q. Frazier is a professor and dean at the College of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Lynne S. Nemeth
- Pamela Holtzclaw Williams is an assistant professor and Lynne S. Nemeth is an associate professor in the College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. Jennifer E. Sanner is an assistant professor at the Houston School of Nursing: Center for Nursing Research at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Lorraine Q. Frazier is a professor and dean at the College of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Jennifer E. Sanner
- Pamela Holtzclaw Williams is an assistant professor and Lynne S. Nemeth is an associate professor in the College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. Jennifer E. Sanner is an assistant professor at the Houston School of Nursing: Center for Nursing Research at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Lorraine Q. Frazier is a professor and dean at the College of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Lorraine Q. Frazier
- Pamela Holtzclaw Williams is an assistant professor and Lynne S. Nemeth is an associate professor in the College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston. Jennifer E. Sanner is an assistant professor at the Houston School of Nursing: Center for Nursing Research at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Lorraine Q. Frazier is a professor and dean at the College of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rodriguez EM, Torres ET, Erwin DO. Awareness and interest in biospecimen donation for cancer research: views from gatekeepers and prospective participants in the Latino community. J Community Genet 2013. [PMID: 23733683 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0152-2.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Latinos are one of the fastest-growing population groups in the USA, and are underrepresented in scientific research and even more so in genetic research. The disproportionately lower number of certain subpopulations participating in biomedical research has a significant impact on the representativeness of scientific outcomes. We established a collaboration with scientists at a designated National Cancer Institute comprehensive cancer center to test the feasibility of community-based approaches for engaging Latinos in biospecimen donation for cancer genomic research. A methods triangulation approach was applied to gain a deeper understanding from the community, that included key informant interviews with Latino community leaders (N = 6), four focus groups (N = 22) with members of the Latino community, and the use of an audience response system within the focus groups to capture quantitative data. Overall, the majority of participants had never participated in biospecimen donation; however, despite being unaware of the biobank, they expressed willingness to participate as a way to help advance research. Themes included: Confusion on what biospecimen donation process entails; Barriers to and incentives for participation; Strategies and locations for reaching the Latino community. Clear communication of the "public good" as it relates to biospecimen donation by healthy/non-patient participants is a less clearly conceptualized message; yet, the significance of delivering this message is important to gaining participation and increasing the diversity of samples available for cancer genomic studies from a broader community context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Marie Rodriguez
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rodriguez EM, Torres ET, Erwin DO. Awareness and interest in biospecimen donation for cancer research: views from gatekeepers and prospective participants in the Latino community. J Community Genet 2013; 4:461-8. [PMID: 23733683 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-013-0152-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2013] [Accepted: 05/22/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Latinos are one of the fastest-growing population groups in the USA, and are underrepresented in scientific research and even more so in genetic research. The disproportionately lower number of certain subpopulations participating in biomedical research has a significant impact on the representativeness of scientific outcomes. We established a collaboration with scientists at a designated National Cancer Institute comprehensive cancer center to test the feasibility of community-based approaches for engaging Latinos in biospecimen donation for cancer genomic research. A methods triangulation approach was applied to gain a deeper understanding from the community, that included key informant interviews with Latino community leaders (N = 6), four focus groups (N = 22) with members of the Latino community, and the use of an audience response system within the focus groups to capture quantitative data. Overall, the majority of participants had never participated in biospecimen donation; however, despite being unaware of the biobank, they expressed willingness to participate as a way to help advance research. Themes included: Confusion on what biospecimen donation process entails; Barriers to and incentives for participation; Strategies and locations for reaching the Latino community. Clear communication of the "public good" as it relates to biospecimen donation by healthy/non-patient participants is a less clearly conceptualized message; yet, the significance of delivering this message is important to gaining participation and increasing the diversity of samples available for cancer genomic studies from a broader community context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Marie Rodriguez
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen JY, Xu H, Shi P, Culbertson A, Meslin EM. Ethics and Privacy Considerations for Systems Biology Applications in Predictive and Personalized Medicine. Bioinformatics 2013. [DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-3604-0.ch071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Integrative analysis and modeling of the omics data using systems biology have led to growing interests in the development of predictive and personalized medicine. Personalized medicine enables future physicians to prescribe the right drug to the right patient at the right dosage, by helping them link each patient’s genotype to their specific disease conditions. This chapter shares technological, ethical, and social perspectives on emerging personalized medicine applications. First, it examines the history and research trends of pharmacogenomics, systems biology, and personalized medicine. Next, it presents bioethical concerns that arise from dealing with the increasing accumulation of biological samples in many biobanking projects today. Lastly, the chapter describes growing concerns over patient privacy when large amount of individuals’ genetic data and clinical data are managed electronically and accessible online.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Y. Chen
- Indiana Center for Systems Biology and Personalized Medicine, USA, Indiana University, USA & Purdue University, USA
| | - Heng Xu
- The Pennsylvania State University, USA
| | - Pan Shi
- The Pennsylvania State University, USA
| | | | - Eric M. Meslin
- Indiana University Center for Bioethics, USA & Indiana University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Erwin DO, Moysich K, Kiviniemi MT, Saad-Harfouche FG, Davis W, Clark-Hargrave N, Ciupak GL, Ambrosone CB, Walker C. Community-based partnership to identify keys to biospecimen research participation. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2013; 28:43-51. [PMID: 23055133 PMCID: PMC3553248 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-012-0421-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Reported barriers to participation in biospecimen banking include unwillingness to undergo blood-draw procedures and concerns about confidentiality breaches, privacy, and discrimination. The study identified key factors and influential perspectives to address these barriers and inform methods to improve recruitment and research participation among racially diverse community. A mixed-methods, community-based participatory research orientation was used to collect formative findings to develop a pilot intervention. Methods included nine key informant interviews, three focus groups (n = 26), and 64 community surveys. Findings showed: (1) increased concern of exploitation by pharmaceutical company sponsor; (2) varied perceptions about monetary compensation for research participation; and (3) willingness to participate in a biospecimen banking study by more than 30% of the people in the community survey. Research participation and biospecimen donation may be influenced by who is sponsoring a study. Monetary incentives for study participation may be more important for African American than White participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah O Erwin
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Luque JS, Quinn GP, Montel-Ishino FA, Arevalo M, Bynum SA, Noel-Thomas S, Wells KJ, Gwede CK, Meade CD. Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2012; 27:91-9. [PMID: 21927867 PMCID: PMC3735437 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-011-0275-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Preparing healthy community members with timely communications prior to engaging them in a request to donate biospecimens promises to improve the experience of biobanking participation. To this end, a qualitative study was conducted to assess community member knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and informational needs about cancer-related biospecimen collection in a large metropolitan area in southwest Florida. The study utilized purposive sampling techniques to recruit a total of 95 participants to participate in 12 focus groups, segmented by race/ethnicity and language preference (mixed race, African American only, and Spanish speaking) and age (18-29, 30-54, and 55 and older). Focus group interviews were analyzed using content analysis to identify emergent themes. Overall, participants in the 30 years and older groups were favorable toward participating in biobanking if their concerns were addressed, such as confidentiality and consent issues, in contrast to participants aged 18-29 who were more skeptical. For all participants, the desire to participate in research that seeks new cancer treatments outweighed mistrust. Moreover, many cited the potential scientific benefit for future generations as a primary motivator. Finally, in some groups a therapeutic misconception was expressed, where participants expressed a willingness to forego confidentiality of their health status in exchange for therapeutic benefit. This study contributes to the literature on community perceptions of the benefits and barriers of biobanking and adds to the development of meaningful education communication priming tools to advance understandings about biobanking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Luque
- Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brothers KB, Morrison DR, Clayton EW. Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank. Am J Med Genet A 2011; 155A:2982-90. [PMID: 22065592 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2010] [Accepted: 07/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Although US research regulations allow for de-identified biorepositories to be developed without formal informed consent from the patients whose samples are included, it is unknown whether this model will be well-received by community members. Based on early evidence that such a biobank could be successful if patients who object have the opportunity to opt-out, Vanderbilt University developed a biorepository named BioVU that follows this model. This study reports the findings from two large-scale surveys among communities important to this biorepository. In the first, a population-based phone survey of Nashville residents, we found that approval for BioVU is high (93.9%) and that this approval is similar among all population groups. A hypothetical biobank that does not obtain some form of written permission is much less well received. In the second, an online survey of Vanderbilt University faculty and staff, we found a higher level of support for BioVU (94.5%) among faculty and staff working throughout the university. In this survey, employees least likely to approve of BioVU are those employees who prefer not to receive medical care at Vanderbilt University. These surveys demonstrate the highest level of approval for a genomic biobank ever reported in the literature, even among groups traditionally cautious about such research. This high level of approval may reflect increasing comfort with genomic research over time combined with the effect that trust in a specific institution can have on approval for an operating biobank compared with approval of a hypothetical biobank.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle B Brothers
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prainsack B. Voting with their mice: personal genome testing and the "participatory turn" in disease research. Account Res 2011; 18:132-47. [PMID: 21574070 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2011.575032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
While the availability of genome tests on the internet has given rise to heated debates about the likely impact on personal genome information on test-takers, on insurance, and on healthcare systems, in this article I argue that a more tangible effect of personal genomics is that it has started to change how participation in disease research is conceived and enacted. I examine three models of research participation that personal genomics customers are encouraged to engage in. I conclude with an evaluation of the pitfalls and benefits of "crowdsourcing" genetic disease research in the context of personal genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Prainsack
- King's College London, Centre for Biomedicine and Society, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Valle-Mansilla JI, Ruiz-Canela M, Sulmasy DP. Patients' attitudes to informed consent for genomic research with donated samples. Cancer Invest 2010; 28:726-34. [PMID: 20590448 DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2010.494320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
This international self-administered survey describes the attitudes of 279 patients, who had previously donated samples, regarding informed consent for future genomic research on donated tissue and explores factors associated with these attitudes. Most of the patients supported a fairly broad consent unless research was industry-sponsored. In multivariate analysis, support for broad informed consent was highest among neurology patients and patients who had already given a broad informed consent. There was a trend for Spaniards to be more supportive for a broad informed consent than their US counterparts. Exploring these opinions may help improve consent and explain why some patients reject broader forms of consent.
Collapse
|
17
|
Meslin EM. The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13:207-14. [PMID: 20395689 PMCID: PMC2865393 DOI: 10.1159/000279622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
With the domestic and international proliferation of biobanks and their associated connections to health information databases, scholarly attention has been turning from the ethical issues arising from the construction of biobanks to the ethical issues that emerge in their operation and management. Calls for greater transparency in governance structures, coupled with stern reminders of the value of maintaining public trust, are seen as critical components in the success of these resources. Two different approaches have been adopted for addressing these types of ethical issues: the first is a 'top-down' approach which focuses on developing policy, procedures, regulations and guidelines to aid decision-makers. The second is a 'bottom-up' approach, which begins with those who are most affected by the issues and attempts to inductively develop consensus recommendations and policy. While both approaches have merit, I argue that more work needs to be done on 'bottom-up' strategies if trust and transparency are to be more than mere slogans. Using 2 case examples from Indiana, the paper summarizes data from a set of surveys we recently conducted that address issues arising from biobanks that provide some insight into issues associated with trust and transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric M Meslin
- Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind. 46202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Large cohort studies to investigate interactions between genes, environment, and lifestyle require large representative samples of the population. The Department of Veterans Affairs health care system is uniquely positioned to carry out such research, with a large patient population and a sophisticated system of electronic medical records. As Veterans Affairs considers establishing a large database of genetic information and medical records for research purposes, a survey of 931 Veterans Affairs patients was carried out to measure their willingness to participate, what their concerns would be, and their preferences about some aspects of study design. METHODS A sample of veterans who receive Veterans Affairs health care was surveyed online in April and May of 2008. The proposed genomic study was described to respondents, who then were asked about their support for the study and willingness to participate, and their opinions about the study and some of its components. A descriptive analysis examined differences in attitudes among demographic groups, and whether general beliefs were associated with support or willingness to participate. RESULTS Most respondents (83%) said the database should definitely or probably be created, and overall, 71% said they would definitely or probably participate. CONCLUSION Majorities of Veterans Affairs health patients in a broad range of demographic groups supported the establishment of a genomic database and showed willingness to participate. Although the desire to learn about one's own health from the study was high, altruistic characteristics were strongly related to whether or not veterans would participate.
Collapse
|