Use of ibuprofen for the closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a systematic review of meta-analyses

Chiral pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers in Chinese preterm neonates with patent ductus arteriosus using a validated UHPLC-MS/MS method

Persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is generally observed in preterm neonates. Oral ibuprofen is the standard treatment for closing PDA in China. To investigate the chiral pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers in Chinese premature infants with PDA, a simple, fast, and sensitive analytical enantioselective technology was developed with ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) - tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Chromatographic separation of (R)-ibuprofen and (S)-ibuprofen was accomplished on a Lux® 3 µm Cellulose-3 (150 mm × 2.0 mm, 3 μm) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min within 6 min. UPLC separation was achieved by isocratic elution with a mobile phase consisting of formic acid:water (75:1000000, v/v) and acetonitrile:methanol (1:1, v/v). Only 50 µL of plasma samples were pre-treated with acetonitrile precipitation. Ibuprofen-d3 was used as an internal standard. The standard curves of both enantiomers were linear over a concentration range of 0.0500 μg/mL to 50.00 μg/mL. The method has been validated for selectivity, carryover effect, lower limit of quantification, precision, accuracy, matrix effect, extraction recovery, dilution integrity, and stability based on the existing guidelines of the National Medical Products Administration, the United States Food and Drug Administration, and the European Medicines Agency. This method has been successfully applied to investigate the pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers in 9 preterm infants with PDA. Our results showed that a high chiral inversion ratio of (R)- to (S)-ibuprofen exists in Chinese preterm neonates. Further studies should be conducted to monitor drug concentration following oral administration of ibuprofen and to consider the effect of individual variations and ethnic differences in metabolizing enantiomers of ibuprofen in premature neonates with PDA.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Ibuprofen versus Indomethacin or Paracetamol for the Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Neonates

OBJECTIVE

This was a first-time evaluation that sought to analyze the cost-effectiveness of oral paracetamol and intravenous (IV) indomethacin as alternatives to ibuprofen for PDA in neonates.

METHODS

Decision-analytic, literature-based, economic simulation models were constructed, to follow up the use and consequences of oral/IV ibuprofen versus IV indomethacin, and oral/IV ibuprofen versus oral paracetamol, as first-line therapies for PDA closure. Model outcomes of interest were 'success', defined as PDA closure with/without adverse events, or 'failure' due to no response to the first course of treatment, death or premature discontinuation of therapy due to AEs.

RESULTS

Oral ibuprofen is dominant/cost-effective over IV indomethacin in 97.9% of simulated cases, but oral paracetamol was 75.2% dominant/cost-effective over oral ibuprofen. Against IV ibuprofen, IV indomethacin was 55.3% dominant/cost-effective, whereas oral paracetamol was dominant/cost-effective in 98.5% of the cases. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the study results.

CONCLUSION

For PDA closure, while IV indomethacin was cost-effective against IV ibuprofen, oral paracetamol was cost-effective against both oral and IV ibuprofen.

Different interventions for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in children: a protocol for a network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is one of the most common congenital heart diseases. Once the PDA is diagnosed, it needs to be dealt with in time. At present, main methods include pharmacological treatment, surgical closure, and interventional closure for treatment of PDA. However, the effect of different interventions in PDA management is still controversial. Thus, our study aims to assess the effectiveness of different interventions together and estimate the sequence of these therapies for PDA children. Meanwhile, it is necessary to conduct a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the safety of different interventions comprehensively.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of different interventions for the treatment of PDA. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, gray literature, and trial registry databases were searched from inception to December 2022. We will extract and report data according to methodological guidelines for Bayesian network meta-analysis by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P). Primary PDA closure, overall PDA closure, technical success, surgical success rate, mortality during hospital stay, operation time, intensive care unit stay, intraoperative radiation dose, radiation exposure time, total postoperative complication rate, and postoperative major complication rate will be defined as the outcomes. The quality of all random studies will be assessed using ROB, and quality of evidence for all outcomes will be judged by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication. Since no private and confidential patient data will be contained in the reporting, there are no ethical considerations associated with this protocol.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

INPLASY2020110067.

Efficacy and Costs of Three Pharmacotherapies for Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Premature Infants

BACKGROUND

The hemodynamic impact of persistent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is associated with neonatal morbidities and mortality in preterm newborns. While there has been considerable debate about optimal management of PDA and its impact on clinical outcomes, there is widespread variation in practice, such as using different pharmacotherapies to achieve closure of hemodynamically significant PDA during the first week of life in very low birth weight infants.

AIMS

The objective was to estimate the efficacy of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and indomethacin with regard to ductal closure and to compare the costs of these three commonly used medications to treat PDA in preterm infants.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Registry were searched for trials from the years 2010-2020. We identified 17 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 14 case series that enrolled preterm infants < 37 weeks gestational age for inclusion. Pooled estimates of closure rates for acetaminophen (n = 630), ibuprofen (n = 694), and indomethacin (n = 312) were analyzed using the weighted proportion ratio using a Mantel‑Haenszel random effects model. The chi-squared test of proportions was used to determine significance between groups. We accessed cost estimates of pharmacotherapy from the Lexi-Comp average wholesale price database and utilized a decision tree model to appraise cost benefits for the outcome measure of successful PDA closure.

RESULTS

The pooled proportional point estimates of closure rates from RCTs for acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and indomethacin were 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60-80), 63.4% (95% CI 52.8-74.1), and 71.5% (95% CI 62.3-80.7), respectively. There was no significant statistical difference in closure rates when RCTs and uncontrolled case series were combined. Pairwise comparisons showed both acetaminophen and indomethacin were each more effective in closing PDA than ibuprofen (acetaminophen vs indomethacin: p = 0.01; ibuprofen vs indomethacin: p = 0.02; acetaminophen vs indomethacin: p = 0.93). Comparing costs for successful closure of PDA, at the average wholesale price of different medications, suggested that treatment with acetaminophen costs significantly less, with a mean of $1487 (95% CI 1300-1737), compared to ibuprofen, with a mean of $2585 (95% CI 2214-3104), and indomethacin, with a mean of $2661 (95% CI 2358-3052), per course of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests acetaminophen is non-inferior to both indomethacin and ibuprofen, and costs relatively less for successful PDA constriction in premature infants. Further clinical trials are warranted to compare acetaminophen's safety, along with short- and long-term effects, to help resolve the clinical conundrum of the necessity of early treatment in the management of PDA, and the optimal pharmacological course, if indicated.

Decreased plasma levels of PDGF-BB, VEGF-A, and HIF-2α in preterm infants after ibuprofen treatment

INTRODUCTION

Ibuprofen is one of the most common non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs used to close patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants. PDA is associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), while PDA closure by ibuprofen did not reduce the incidence of BPD or death. Previous studies have indicated an anti-angiogenesis effect of ibuprofen. This study investigated the change of angiogenic factors after ibuprofen treatment in preterm infants.

METHODS

Preterm infants with hemodynamically significant PDA (hsPDA) were included. After confirmed hsPDA by color doppler ultrasonography within 1 week after birth, infants received oral ibuprofen for three continuous days. Paired plasma before and after the ibuprofen treatment was collected and measured by ELISA to determine the concentrations of platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), and hypoxia-inducible factor-2α (HIF-2α).

RESULTS

17 paired plasma from infants with hsPDA were collected. The concentration of PDGF-BB and VEGF-A significantly decreased after ibuprofen treatment (1,908 vs. 442 pg/mL for PDGF-BB, 379 vs. 174 pg/mL for VEGF-A). HIF-2α level showed a tendency to decrease after ibuprofen treatment, although the reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.077).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated decreased vascular growth factors after ibuprofen exposure in hsPDA infants.