1
|
Swildens KX, Sillevis Smitt PAE, van den Bent MJ, French PJ, Geurts M. The Effect of Dexamethasone on the Microenvironment and Efficacy of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac087. [PMID: 35990704 PMCID: PMC9389427 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has not proven clinically effective in glioblastoma. This lack of effectiveness may be partially attributable to the frequent administration of dexamethasone in glioblastoma patients. In this systematic review, we assess whether dexamethasone (1) affects the glioblastoma microenvironment and (2) interferes with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy efficacy in the treatment of glioblastoma. Methods PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for eligible articles published up to September 15, 2021. Both in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies, as well as clinical studies were selected. The following information was extracted from each study: tumor model, corticosteroid treatment, and effects on individual immune components or checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Results Twenty-one preclinical studies in cellular glioma models (n = 10), animal glioma models (n = 6), and glioblastoma patient samples (n = 7), and 3 clinical studies were included. Preclinical studies show that dexamethasone decreases the presence of microglia and other macrophages as well as the number of T lymphocytes in both tumor tissue and periphery. Dexamethasone abrogates the antitumor effects of checkpoint inhibitors on T lymphocytes in preclinical studies. Although randomized studies directly addressing our research question are lacking, clinical studies suggest a negative association between corticosteroids and survival outcomes in glioblastoma patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors after adjustment for relevant prognostic factors. Conclusions Preclinical research shows that dexamethasone inhibits the antitumor immune response in glioma, thereby promoting a protumorigenic microenvironment. The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in glioblastoma patients may therefore be negatively affected by the use of dexamethasone. Future research could investigate the potential of edema-reducing alternatives to dexamethasone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyra X Swildens
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter A E Sillevis Smitt
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J French
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Geurts
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rezaee H, Abbasnia S, Alenabi A, Vakili R, Moheghi N, Tavakol Afshari J, Rezaee SA. Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A and Its Type 1 Receptor in Supratentorial Neoplasm. Rep Biochem Mol Biol 2021; 10:354-361. [PMID: 34981011 PMCID: PMC8718773 DOI: 10.52547/rbmb.10.3.354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the primary angiogenesis regulators in solid cancers. Brain solid tumors are life-threatening diseases in which angiogenesis is an important phase of tumor development and progression. In the present study, VEGF-A and VEGF receptor (VEGF-R1) gene expression was evaluated in CNS brain tumors. METHODS VEGF-A and VEGF-R1 expression was quantified using real-time PCR on fresh biopsies of 38 supratentorial brain tumors compared to 30 non-tumoral tissues. Then, the correlations were investigated with clinic-pathological and demographic factors of the patients. RESULTS PCR product sequencing confirmed the validity of qRT-PCR. Although VEGF-A and VEGF-R1 expression showed increasing trends with the progression of cell proliferation in different stages of astrocytoma, VEGF-R1 did not meet the 95% confidence interval in other brain tumors. An increasing trend in VEGF-A expression and a declining trend in VEGF-R1 expression from Stage I to II were observed in meningioma. VEGF-A and VEGF-R1 expression had no significant correlation with age and gender. Although peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) in astrocytoma was significantly associated with tumor stages, VEGF-A and VEGF-R1 were not correlated with PTBE in meningioma and metastasis. CONCLUSION VEGF-A is a valuable factor for the prognosis of PTBE and malignancy in astrocytoma and is helpful in monitoring treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Rezaee
- Neurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- The first and the second authors contributed equally to this work.
| | - Shadi Abbasnia
- Immunology Research Centre, Inflammation and inflammatory Diseases division, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- The first and the second authors contributed equally to this work.
| | - Anita Alenabi
- Shariati Hospital, Department of Pathology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| | - Rosita Vakili
- Immunology Research Centre, Inflammation and inflammatory Diseases division, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| | - Nasrin Moheghi
- Genetic Laboratory, Qaem Hosp. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| | | | - Seyed Abdolrahim Rezaee
- Immunology Research Centre, Inflammation and inflammatory Diseases division, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muhsen BA, Joshi KC, Lee BS, Thapa B, Borghei-Razavi H, Jia X, Barnett GH, Chao ST, Mohammadi AM, Suh JH, Vogelbaum MA, Angelov L. The effect of Gamma Knife radiosurgery on large posterior fossa metastases and the associated mass effect from peritumoral edema. J Neurosurg 2021; 134:466-474. [PMID: 31978879 DOI: 10.3171/2019.11.jns191485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) as monotherapy is an option for the treatment of large (≥ 2 cm) posterior fossa brain metastases (LPFMs). However, there is concern regarding possible posttreatment increase in peritumoral edema (PTE) and associated compression of the fourth ventricle. This study evaluated the effects and safety of GKRS on tumor and PTE control in LPFM. METHODS The authors performed a single-center retrospective review of 49 patients with 51 LPFMs treated with GKRS. Patients with at least 1 clinical and radiological follow-up visit were included. Tumor, PTE, and fourth ventricle volumetric measurements were used to assess efficacy and safety. Overall survival was a secondary outcome. RESULTS Fifty-one lesions in 49 consecutive patients were identified; 57.1% of patients were male. At the time of GKRS, the median age was 61.5 years, and the median Karnofsky Performance Status score was 90. The median number of LPFMs and overall brain metastases were 1 and 2, respectively. The median overall tumor, PTE, and fourth ventricle volumes at diagnosis were 4.96 cm3 (range 1.4-21.1 cm3), 14.98 cm3 (range 0.6-71.8 cm3), and 1.23 cm3 (range 0.3-3.2 cm3), respectively, and the median lesion diameter was 2.6 cm (range 2.0-5.07 cm). The median follow-up time was 7.3 months (range 1.6-57.2 months). At the first follow-up, 2 months posttreatment, the median tumor volume decreased by 58.66% (range -96.95% to +48.69%, p < 0.001), median PTE decreased by 78.10% (range -99.92% to +198.35%, p < 0.001), and the fourth ventricle increased by 24.97% (range -37.96% to +545.6%, p < 0.001). The local control rate at first follow-up was 98.1%. The median OS was 8.36 months. No patient required surgical intervention, external ventricular drainage, or shunting between treatment and first follow-up. However, 1 patient required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt at 23 months from treatment. Posttreatment, 65.30% received our general steroid taper, 6.12% received no steroids, and 28.58% required prolonged steroid treatment. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective analysis, patients with LPFMs treated with GKRS had a statistically significant posttreatment reduction in tumor size and PTE and marked opening of the fourth ventricle (all p < 0.001). This study demonstrates that GKRS is well tolerated and can be considered in the management of select cases of LPFMs, especially in patients who are poor surgical candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baha'eddin A Muhsen
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | - Krishna C Joshi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | - Bryan S Lee
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Bicky Thapa
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | - Hamid Borghei-Razavi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | - Xuefei Jia
- 2Quantitative Health Sciences, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Gene H Barnett
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | - Samuel T Chao
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | - John H Suh
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
- 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
- 3Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland; and
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kodack DP, Askoxylakis V, Ferraro GB, Sheng Q, Badeaux M, Goel S, Qi X, Shankaraiah R, Cao ZA, Ramjiawan RR, Bezwada D, Patel B, Song Y, Costa C, Naxerova K, Wong CSF, Kloepper J, Das R, Tam A, Tanboon J, Duda DG, Miller CR, Siegel MB, Anders CK, Sanders M, Estrada MV, Schlegel R, Arteaga CL, Brachtel E, Huang A, Fukumura D, Engelman JA, Jain RK. The brain microenvironment mediates resistance in luminal breast cancer to PI3K inhibition through HER3 activation. Sci Transl Med 2018; 9:9/391/eaal4682. [PMID: 28539475 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal4682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2016] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Although targeted therapies are often effective systemically, they fail to adequately control brain metastases. In preclinical models of breast cancer that faithfully recapitulate the disparate clinical responses in these microenvironments, we observed that brain metastases evade phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition despite drug accumulation in the brain lesions. In comparison to extracranial disease, we observed increased HER3 expression and phosphorylation in brain lesions. HER3 blockade overcame the resistance of HER2-amplified and/or PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer brain metastases to PI3K inhibitors, resulting in marked tumor growth delay and improvement in mouse survival. These data provide a mechanistic basis for therapeutic resistance in the brain microenvironment and identify translatable treatment strategies for HER2-amplified and/or PIK3CA-mutant breast cancer brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Kodack
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Vasileios Askoxylakis
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Gino B Ferraro
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Qing Sheng
- Oncology Translational Medicine, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Mark Badeaux
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Shom Goel
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Xiaolong Qi
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Ram Shankaraiah
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Z Alexander Cao
- Oncology Translational Medicine, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Rakesh R Ramjiawan
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Divya Bezwada
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Bhushankumar Patel
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Yongchul Song
- Department of Medicine, MGH Cancer Center and HMS, Boston, MA 02129, USA
| | - Carlotta Costa
- Department of Medicine, MGH Cancer Center and HMS, Boston, MA 02129, USA
| | - Kamila Naxerova
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Christina S F Wong
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jonas Kloepper
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Rita Das
- Oncology Translational Medicine, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Angela Tam
- Oncology Translational Medicine, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | | | - Dan G Duda
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - C Ryan Miller
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| | - Marni B Siegel
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| | - Carey K Anders
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| | - Melinda Sanders
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Monica V Estrada
- Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Robert Schlegel
- Oncology Translational Medicine, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Carlos L Arteaga
- Departments of Medicine and Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Elena Brachtel
- Department of Pathology, MGH and HMS, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Alan Huang
- Oncology Translational Medicine, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Dai Fukumura
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Engelman
- Department of Medicine, MGH Cancer Center and HMS, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
| | - Rakesh K Jain
- Edwin L. Steele Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|