Omadacycline: a therapeutic review of use in community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Current challenges in pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial infection: a case series with literature review

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease (NTM-PD), particularly caused by Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), is rising due to improved diagnostics, increased awareness, and more susceptible populations. NTM-PD significantly affects quality of life and imposes substantial economic costs. Understanding its clinical features, risk factors, and treatment challenges is vital for enhancing patient outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A convenience sample from the University of Connecticut Health Center and Wayne State University involving patients with NTM-PD from 2021 to 2024 was studied retrospectively. Cases were selected to demonstrate typical diagnostic and treatment challenges, followed by a multidisciplinary roundtable discussion to examine patient-centered care strategies.

RESULTS

Analysis of six cases pinpointed chronic lung conditions and immunomodulatory therapy as key risk factors. Standard treatment, involving extensive multi-drug regimens, frequently results in poor adherence due to side effects and complex management requirements. The discussions underlined the importance of a customized, interdisciplinary approach to improve treatment effectiveness and patient quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

NTM-PD is an escalating public health issue with notable clinical and economic consequences. Managing this disease effectively demands a comprehensive, patient-centered strategy that includes precise diagnosis, flexible treatment plans, and collaborative care.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Predicting Omadacycline Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Healthy and Hepatic Impairment Populations

PURPOSE

Omadacycline is a new broad-spectrum aminomethylcycline antibiotic. However, there have been limited pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies of omadacycline in patients with hepatic impairment. The aim of this study was to explore the PK/PD of omadacycline intravenous administration in healthy and hepatically impaired populations.

METHODS

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of omadacycline was developed and validated based on published demographic data and the physiochemical properties of omadacycline. The PK processes in healthy adults were simulated and then extrapolated to a hepatically impaired population. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for PD evaluation by calculating the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of the approved dosages.

FINDINGS

In the hepatically impaired population, there was no significant difference in the maximum concentration (Cmax) compared with the healthy population, while the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from the first data point extrapolated to infinity (AUC_inf) showed a slight increase. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the dosage of 200 mg once daily or 100 mg twice daily intravenously (loading dose) and 100 mg once daily intravenously (maintenance dose) could cover the common pathogens of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) : Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus.

IMPLICATIONS

Hepatic impairment exerts little impact on the PK properties of omadacycline, and no dosage adjustments are necessary for patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment. Current dosing regimens are predicted to produce satisfactory therapeutic effects against non-drug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae but may not produce the desired AUC/MIC ratios in patients with Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Evaluation of omadacycline regimens for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia patients infected with Staphylococcus Aureus by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis

Omadacycline is an FDA-approved agent for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of omadacycline for treating CABP patients infected with Staphylococcus aureus, including Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), using pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis. Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were performed by utilizing omadacycline pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data, and in vivo PK/PD targets to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) values for different dose regimens against MRSA and MSSA in CABP patients. A dosage regimen with a PTA or CFR expectation value greater than 90% was considered optimal. For all recommended dose regimens, PTA values for MRSA MIC ≤1 and MSSA MIC ≤4 on days 1, 4, and 7 were greater than 90%. Based on the MIC distribution of Staphylococcus aureus, all dose regimens had CFR values greater than 90% for both MRSA and MSSA. CFR values for different bacterial strains were still greater than 90% within the range of PK/PD target values less than 40, although they gradually decreased with increasing PK/PD target values. PK/PD modeling demonstrated that all recommended dose regimens of omadacycline are highly effective against CABP patients infected with MRSA and MSSA. The study provides theoretical support for the efficacy of omadacycline in different dose regimens.

Fecal Pharmacokinetics and Gut Microbiome Effects of Oral Omadacycline Versus Vancomycin in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common healthcare-associated infection with limited treatment options. Omadacycline, an aminomethylcycline tetracycline, has potent in vitro activity against C difficile and a low propensity to cause CDI in clinical trials. We aimed to assess fecal pharmacokinetics and gut microbiome effects of oral omadacycline compared to oral vancomycin in healthy adults.

METHODS

This was a phase 1, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial conducted in healthy volunteers aged 18-40 years. Subjects received a 10-day course of omadacycline or vancomycin. Stool samples were collected at baseline, daily during therapy, and at follow-up visits. Omadacycline and vancomycin stool concentrations were assessed, and microbiome changes were compared.

RESULTS

Sixteen healthy volunteers with a mean age of 26 (standard deviation [SD], 5) years were enrolled; 62.5% were male, and participants' mean body mass index was 23.5 (SD, 4.0) kg/m2. Omadacycline was well tolerated with no safety signal differences between the 2 antibiotics. A rapid initial increase in fecal concentrations of omadacycline was observed compared to vancomycin, with maximum concentrations achieved within 48 hours. A significant difference in alpha diversity was observed following therapy in both the omadacycline and vancomycin groups (P < .05). Bacterial abundance and beta diversity analysis showed differing microbiome changes in subjects who received omadacycline versus vancomycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects given omadacycline had high fecal concentrations with a distinct microbiome profile compared to vancomycin.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT06030219.

Omadacycline for the Treatment of Severe Chlamydia psittaci Pneumonia Complicated with Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Background

Chlamydia psittaci (C. psittaci) is a pathogen that is seldom implicated in community-acquired pneumonia and is rarely linked to severe pneumonia. Reports of severe C. psittaci pneumonia accompanied by Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) are scarce. Tetracyclines are the preferred therapeutic approach for psittacosis. Omadacycline, a novel tetracycline, demonstrates strong antibacterial efficacy against typical bacteria and atypical pathogens, including C. psittaci. However, its application in the treatment of psittacosis pneumonia remains constrained.

Case Presentation

A 77-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital presenting with symptoms of fever, low back pain, and headache. The diagnosis of C. psittaci was established through the utilization of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Initial administration of moxifloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and doxycycline proved to be ineffective. Subsequent omadacycline leaded to the successful resolution of fever and dyspnea. However, after the endotracheal tube was removed, the patient experienced a rapid decline in symmetrical limb strength, leading to a diagnosis of GBS based on clinical manifestations, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and electromyography. Following a 5-day course of immunoglobulin therapy and nutritional nerve treatment, the patient's condition ameliorated, culminating in an uncomplicated discharge.

Conclusion

This case provides evidence supporting the potential use of omadacycline as a therapeutic option for the treatment of severe C. psittaci pneumonia. The utilization of mNGS technology is of paramount importance in the prompt identification of uncommon pathogens, including C. psittaci. Nevertheless, the occurrence of GBS should be taken into consideration when C. psittaci pneumonia is accompanied by symmetrical limb weakness. These findings have important implications for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with C. psittaci pneumonia.

Omadacycline therapy for Mycobacterium abscessus species infections

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance and therapy-related adverse effects make Mycobacterium abscessus treatment challenging. Omadacycline is a novel, bioavailable aminomethylcycline with favourable in vitro activity against M. abscessus.

AIMS

To describe a case report and review the published literature describing outcomes for M. abscessus infections treated with omadacycline.

METHODS

Systematic literature review.

RESULTS

We identified three articles that, in addition to our case report, describe 18 patients. Pulmonary infections were most frequent. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were reported for two isolates (0.25 and 0.5 mg/L). Despite half the patients starting omadacycline because of failure of prior therapy, 15 (83%) had a favourable outcome, defined as 'cure', 'improvement' or 'clinical success' as determined by the primary study authors. One patient (6%) discontinued omadacycline because of gastrointestinal intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the limited observational data and in vitro susceptibility results are encouraging, randomised control trials are required to determine the role of omadacycline as part of combination therapy for this most difficult-to-treat pathogen.

Omadacycline in treating community-based infections: a review and expert perspective

INTRODUCTION

Omadacycline is approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infection (ABSSSI). The integration of newer agents into clinical use involves understanding the nuances of clinical decision-making. This review will provide an in-depth focus on omadacycline in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

Literature review of omadacycline utilizing PubMed was performed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of omadacycline pharmacology, microbiology, registrational Phase 3 clinical trials, and post-marketing clinical studies. In addition, the immunomodulatory and other attributes of tetracycline class of antibiotics, of which omadacycline is a member, are reviewed, introducing the concept of antibiotic selection with attention to the bacterial pathogen and human host relationship.

EXPERT OPINION

Omadacycline builds upon the favorable attributes of tetracycline antibiotics and provides very reliable empiric coverage for both Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus spp. Clinicians require a more robust understanding of antibiotics, including omadacycline, in order to optimize patient outcomes, streamline care, and reduce medical costs.