Diagnostic serum vitamin D level is not a reliable prognostic factor for resectable breast cancer

Postdiagnosis dietary factors, supplement use and breast cancer prognosis: Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Little is known about how diet might influence breast cancer prognosis. The current systematic reviews and meta-analyses summarise the evidence on postdiagnosis dietary factors and breast cancer outcomes from randomised controlled trials and longitudinal observational studies. PubMed and Embase were searched through 31st October 2021. Random-effects linear dose-response meta-analysis was conducted when at least three studies with sufficient information were available. The quality of the evidence was evaluated by an independent Expert Panel. We identified 108 publications. No meta-analysis was conducted for dietary patterns, vegetables, wholegrains, fish, meat, and supplements due to few studies, often with insufficient data. Meta-analysis was only possible for all-cause mortality with dairy, isoflavone, carbohydrate, dietary fibre, alcohol intake and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and for breast cancer-specific mortality with fruit, dairy, carbohydrate, protein, dietary fat, fibre, alcohol intake and serum 25(OH)D. The results, with few exceptions, were generally null. There was limited-suggestive evidence that predefined dietary patterns may reduce the risk of all-cause and other causes of death; that isoflavone intake reduces the risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk (RR) per 2 mg/day: 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.92-1.02), breast cancer-specific mortality (RR for high vs low: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.64-1.07), and recurrence (RR for high vs low: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.92); that dietary fibre intake decreases all-cause mortality (RR per 10 g/day: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80-0.94); and that serum 25(OH)D is inversely associated with all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality (RR per 10 nmol/L: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.97 and 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.99, respectively). The remaining associations were graded as limited-no conclusion.

The Role of Vitamin D and Sunlight Incidence in Cancer

BACKGROUND

Vitamin D (VD) deficiency affects individuals of different ages in many countries. VD deficiency may be related to several diseases, including cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review the relationship between VD deficiency and cancer.

METHODS

We describe the proteins involved in cancer pathogenesis and how those proteins can be influenced by VD deficiency. We also investigated a relationship between cancer death rate and solar radiation.

RESULTS

We found an increased bladder cancer, breast cancer, colon-rectum cancer, lung cancer, oesophagus cancer, oral cancer, ovary cancer, pancreas cancer, skin cancer and stomach cancer death rate in countries with low sunlight. It was also observed that amyloid precursor protein, ryanodine receptor, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1, and receptor for advanced glycation end products are associated with a worse prognosis in cancer. While the Klotho protein and VD receptor are associated with a better prognosis in the disease. Nfr2 is associated with both worse and better prognosis in cancer.

CONCLUSION

The literature suggests that VD deficiency might be involved in cancer progression. According to sunlight data, we can conclude that countries with low average sunlight have high cancers death rate. New studies involving transcriptional and genomic data in combination with VD measurement in long-term experiments are required to establish new relationships between VD and cancer.

Vitamin D deficiency in cancer patients and predictors for screening (D-ONC study)

INTRODUCTION

Vitamin D is a prohormone that is vital for calcium/phosphate balance, bone structure, and physiological functioning. Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is an important clinical problem worldwide. However, there are no standardized protocols for screening of patients with a diagnosis of cancer. The purpose of this study is to define the prevalence of VDD in cancer patients and establish the predictors of VDD to address a specific group of patient for screening.

MATERIAL/METHODS

The study was designed as a retrospective case-control study. The patients cared in the outpatient clinic between December 2016 and May 2018 with a diagnosis of cancer were evaluated. The clinical properties and the 25(OH) D levels were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between VDD and clinical parameters.

RESULTS

In 2 cancer centers, 706 patients with a diagnosis of cancer were evaluated. Median 25(OH) D level was 12.2 ng/mL (2.1-96.4). VDD was present in 509 (72.0%) of patients. The multivariate analysis of factors associated with VDD showed that female gender (OR: 1.5 [95% CI: 1.05-2.4], P = 0.026), low sun light exposure (OR: 1.4 [95% CI: 1.009-2.1], P = 0.045), being under palliative (OR: 1.5, [95% CI: 1.008-2.4] P = 0.04) or adjuvant setting (OR: 2.6 [95% CI: 1.3-5.1], P = 0.006), and history of gastrointestinal surgery (OR: 1.8, [95% CI: 1.03-3.2] P = 0.03) were associated with VDD. The female patients with headscarf had lower 25(OH) D levels than without group (10.5 ng/mL vs 23.4 ng/mL, P < 0.001) and they had more VDD (77.2% vs 29.4%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study concluded that prevalence of VDD is high in cancer patients and female gender, low sun light exposure, being under palliative or adjuvant setting, and history of gastrointestinal surgery are associated with VDD. These parameters should be used for selecting patients for screening.