Sequential treatment with afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: an observational study

Optimizing the Treatment for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Mutated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Low-Income Countries: A Review

Introduction

Osimertinib is the treatment of choice for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of its high price, many low-income countries, such as Syria, cannot provide osimertinib, which makes it difficult to choose the appropriate treatment for these patients. This study aimed to review articles that assessed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for advanced NSCLC and developed an appropriate treatment plan for Syrian patients.

Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted of published phase II and III studies that assessed the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for advanced NSCLC between January 2003 and May 2022.

Results

Seventeen articles were reviewed. The results were similar when erlotinib or icotinib was compared with gefitinib. Progression-free survival and overall survival for afatinib and dacomitinib were longer than for gefitinib, with small significant differences. Osimertinib was the only TKI that showed efficacy against the T790M mutation, which showed an improvement over the first- and second-generation TKIs. Osimertinib as a first-line therapy is not cost-effective compared with first- and second-generation TKIs.

Conclusion

Osimertinib is the preferred first-line treatment in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. First- and second-generation TKIs are still considered good options, especially in low-income countries that cannot cover the costs of osimertinib.

Absence of copy number gain of EGFR: A possible predictive marker of long-term response to afatinib

Treatment efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is diverse even in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR activating mutations. Extraordinary long-term responses sustained over 3 years among NSCLC patients treated with afatinib, an EGFR-TKI, have been reported, but how to predict such long survivors has not been clarified. A multi-institutional prospective observational study, based on comprehensive genomic examination performed with next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), was conducted to identify potential predictive markers of long-term response to afatinib. Twenty-nine patients with advanced stage NSCLC and EGFR driver mutations detected by standard techniques were enrolled in the study. ctDNA from plasma collected before afatinib treatment was analyzed by Guardant360. ctDNA was detected in 25 of the 29 samples. Median progression-free survival was shorter in patients whose tumors had EGFR copy number gain (7.0 vs 23.0 months, p = 0.022). The impact of EGFR copy number on cell proliferation and the antitumor effect of afatinib were evaluated using genome-editing lung cancer cell lines. HCC827 with EGFR amplification was relatively resistant to afatinib at concentrations below 0.5 nM, but genome-edited derivatives of HCC827 with decreased EGFR copy number demonstrated growth inhibition with 0.1 nM afatinib. The absence of EGFR copy number gain detected in ctDNA may be a predictive marker of long-term response to afatinib. Comprehensive genomic analysis could lead to a more accurate prediction of EGFR-TKI efficacy.

Real-world data with afatinib in Spanish patients with treatment-naïve non-small-cell lung cancer harboring exon 19 deletions in epidermal growth factor receptor (Del19 EGFR): Clinical experience of the Galician Lung Cancer Group

BACKGROUND

In clinical studies, first-line afatinib demonstrated efficacy in Del19-EGFR NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, non-interventional study assessed efficacy and safety of first-line afatinib in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC with Del19-EGFR from Galicia (Spain), with a preplanned analysis by age (<70 vs ≥70 years).

RESULTS

Median age of 46 patients enrolled was 69.5 years (range 37-87). The objective response rate (ORR) was 78.2%, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 20.5 months (95% CI 12.7, 28.3) and median overall survival (OS) of 37.5 months (95% CI 19.2-55.8). Outcomes by age (<70 vs ≥70 years) were ORR of 82.6% vs 73.9%, median PFS of 20.2 months (95% CI 14.8-25.6) vs 24.1 (9.8-38.3), and median OS of 45.1 months (95% CI, 17.0-73.1) vs 33.9 (28.7-39.1), respectively. Median treatment duration was 17.2 months (range 0.4-64.1) with 11 patients still on treatment; 14 patients received osimertinib at discontinuation due to T790M. Grade 3 adverse events included mucositis (n = 7, 15.2%), skin toxicity (n = 9, 19.6%), and diarrhea (n = 6, 13.0%) that were manageable with dose reductions. The afatinib dose was reduced in 31 patients (67.4%) and treatment was discontinued in 8 patients (17.4%) due to adverse events. By age (<70 vs ≥70 years), afatinib was dose-reduced in 13 (56.5%) vs 18 patients (78.3%) and discontinued in 3 (13.0%) vs 5 patients (21.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PFS in our patients was longer than reported in clinical studies with similar response rates and toxicity, even in older patients, reflecting a good risk-benefit from afatinib in patients with Del19-EGFR NSCLC.

MICROABSTRACT

This real-world study of first-line afatinib in Caucasian patients with Del19 EGFR NSCLC reported durable efficacy and showed that older patients (> 70 years) benefitted from afatinib as much as younger patients. The safety profile of afatinib was as expected, albeit more dose reductions in older patients. Afatinib may be an option for patients with Del19 EGFR NSCLC, even in those who are older.

Engaging innate immunity for targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor: Therapeutic options leveraging innate immunity versus adaptive immunity versus inhibition of signaling

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a key player in the normal tissue physiology and the pathology of cancer. Therapeutic approaches have now been developed to target oncogenic genetic aberrations of EGFR, found in a subset of tumors, and to take advantage of overexpression of EGFR in tumors. The development of small-molecule inhibitors and anti-EGFR antibodies targeting EGFR activation have resulted in effective but limited treatment options for patients with mutated or wild-type EGFR-expressing cancers, while therapeutic approaches that deploy effectors of the adaptive or innate immune system are still undergoing development. This review discusses EGFR-targeting therapies acting through distinct molecular mechanisms to destroy EGFR-expressing cancer cells. The focus is on the successes and limitations of therapies targeting the activation of EGFR versus those that exploit the cytotoxic T cells and innate immune cells to target EGFR-expressing cancer cells. Moreover, we discuss alternative approaches that may have the potential to overcome limitations of current therapies; in particular the innate cell engagers are discussed. Furthermore, this review highlights the potential to combine innate cell engagers with immunotherapies, to maximize their effectiveness, or with unspecific cell therapies, to convert them into tumor-specific agents.

Association between EGFR gene mutant protein expression and T790M mutation after first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment resistance: a retrospective, single-arm clinical study

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is an important treatment for lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR gene mutations. The purpose of this study was to review the efficacy of first-generation EGFR-TKIs and the incidence of T790M after first-generation TKI resistance in stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with positive EGFR gene mutation expression associated with EGFR mutant protein.

Methods

Tumor tissues were collected from stage IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR gene mutation who received first-generation EGFR-TKI targeted therapy. Patients were followed up through outpatient and inpatient systems. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of corresponding EGFR mutant protein in tumor tissues. The incidence of T790M mutation after first-generation TKI resistance and the correlation between the mutant protein and progression-free survival (PFS) after first-generation TKI treatment were investigated.

Results

T790M mutation rates were 37.93% (11/29) and 42.50% (17/40) in the EGFR mutation groups, respectively, after first-generation TKI treatment for drug resistance. In patients with exon 19 deletion, T790M mutations were found in 63.64% (7/11) of patients with positive protein expression and 22.22% (4/18) of patients with negative protein expression (P=0.026; χ²=4.974). The mutation rate of T790M after drug resistance in patients with L858R mutation was 53.57% (15/28) and 16.67% (2/12) in the protein expression-positive and negative groups, respectively (χ²=4.682, P=0.030). The variations were statistically significant.

Conclusions

After resistance to the first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment, the occurrence of T790M mutation may be related to the expression of EGFR mutant protein in patients with EGFR gene mutation.

Real-world efficacy of osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI treated NSCLC patients without identification of T790M mutation

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI-treated NSCLC without identification of T790M mutational status remains unclear in real-world practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

417 patients had stage III-IV NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation and 154 out of 417 patients receiving osimertinib as ≥ second-line EGFR-TKI were identified. The time to treatment failure and risk of death were analyzed.

RESULTS

Higher risk of death was found in EGFR-mutant patients with age ≥ 65 years, non-adenocarcinoma, no surgery or radiation, non-exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R, higher ECOG PS (2-4), PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, and bone/liver/adrenal metastasis (all p < 0.05). Osimertinib as ≥ second-line TKI in patients with/without identification of T790M revealed lower risk of death compared to first-line first/second generation TKI without subsequent osimertinib (p = 0.0002; 0.0232, respectively). However, osimertinib-treated patients with T790M did not have superior survival than those without (p = 0.2803). A higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib was found in males, patients with first-line TKI duration ≤ 12 months, BMI drop > 10%, and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% (All p < 0.05). Nonetheless, osimertinib as ≥ second-line TKI in patients without identification of 790 M did not have higher risk of treatment failure than those with T790M (p = 0.1236).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that osimertinib as second line or subsequent TKI in EGFR-TKI-treated patients without identification of T790M revealed lower risk of death compared to first-line first/second generation TKI without subsequent osimertinib, in real-world practice. Additionally, EGFR-mutant patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% had a higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib and worse overall survival than those with PD-L1 expression < 50%. These results suggest that osimertinib as second line or subsequent TKI may be a potential alternative option for the treatment of patients without identification of T790M and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% is associated with a significantly poor outcome in patients receiving osimertinib.

Functional interplay between long non-coding RNAs and Breast CSCs

Breast cancer (BC) represents aggressive cancer affecting most women’s lives globally. Metastasis and recurrence are the two most common factors in a breast cancer patient's poor prognosis. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are tumor cells that are able to self-renew and differentiate, which is a significant factor in metastasis and recurrence of cancer. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) describe a group of RNAs that are longer than 200 nucleotides and do not have the ability to code for proteins. Some of these lncRNAs can be mainly produced in various tissues and tumor forms. In the development and spread of malignancies, lncRNAs have a significant role in influencing multiple signaling pathways positively or negatively, making them promise useful diagnostic and prognostic markers in treating the disease and guiding clinical therapy. However, it is not well known how the interaction of lncRNAs with CSCs will affect cancer development and progression.

Here, in this review, we attempt to summarize recent findings that focus on lncRNAs affect cancer stem cell self-renewal and differentiation in breast cancer development and progression, as well as the strategies and challenges for overcoming lncRNA's therapeutic resistance.

Cross-Resistance Among Sequential Cancer Therapeutics: An Emerging Issue

Over the past two decades, cancer treatment has benefited from having a significant increase in the number of targeted drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. With the introduction of targeted therapy, a great shift towards a new era has taken place that is characterized by reduced cytotoxicity and improved clinical outcomes compared to traditional chemotherapeutic drugs. At present, targeted therapies and other systemic anti-cancer therapies available (immunotherapy, cytotoxic, endocrine therapies and others) are used alone or in combination in different settings (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic). As a result, it is not uncommon for patients affected by an advanced malignancy to receive subsequent anti-cancer therapies. In this challenging complexity of cancer treatment, the clinical pathways of real-life patients are often not as direct as predicted by standard guidelines and clinical trials, and cross-resistance among sequential anti-cancer therapies represents an emerging issue. In this review, we summarize the main cross-resistance events described in the diverse tumor types and provide insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in this process. We also discuss the current challenges and provide perspectives for the research and development of strategies to overcome cross-resistance and proceed towards a personalized approach.

Machine Learning-Based Analysis of Treatment Sequences Typology in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Long-Term Survivors Treated With Nivolumab

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors substantially changed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) management and can lead to long-term survival. The aims of this study were (1) to use a machine learning method to establish a typology of treatment sequences on patients with aNSCLC who were alive 2 years after initiating a treatment with anti-programmed death-ligand 1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab and (2) to describe the patients' characteristics according to the typology of treatment sequences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study was based on data from the comprehensive French hospital discharge database for all patients with lung cancer with at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy, starting nivolumab between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, and alive 2 years after nivolumab treatment initiation. Patients were followed until December 31, 2018. A typology of most common treatment sequences was established using hierarchical clustering with time sequence analysis.

RESULTS

Two thousand two hundred twelve study patients were, on average, 63.0 years old, 69.9% of them were men, and 61.9% had a nonsquamous cell carcinoma. During the 2 years after nivolumab treatment initiation, clusters of patients with four basic types of treatment sequences were identified: (1) almost continuous nivolumab treatment (44% of patients); (2) nivolumab most of the time followed by a treatment-free interval or a chemotherapy (15% of patients); and a short or medium nivolumab treatment, followed by (3) a long systemic treatment-free interval (17% of patients) or (4) a long chemotherapy (23% of patients).

CONCLUSION

This machine learning approach enabled the identification of a typology of four representative treatment sequences observed in long-term survival. It was noted that most long-term survivors were treated with nivolumab for well over 1 year.

Biomarker subset analysis of a phase IIIb, open-label study of afatinib in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive patients with EGFRm+ non-small-cell lung cancer

Aim: To explore the relationship between mutations in cfDNA and response to afatinib. Patients & methods: In total, 64 patients from one Chinese site with locally advanced/metastatic EGFRm+ non-small-cell lung cancer, who received afatinib 40 mg once daily, were included. Results: Overall, 33 (82.5%) patients became EGFRm- by visit 3; median progression-free survival was longer in these patients vs those who did not (11.0 vs 5.5 months). Progression-free survival was shorter in 42 (45.2%) patients with non-EGFR co-mutations at baseline vs those without (8.1 vs 12.5 months). Neither difference was significant. Conclusion: Afatinib provided clinical benefit for patients with EGFRm+ non-small-cell lung cancer across all subgroups. EGFRm status assessment in plasma cfDNA is a useful method of monitoring treatment.

A Phase IIIb Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC: Final Analysis, with a Focus on Patients Enrolled at Sites in China

Background

Afatinib has been shown as a suitable option for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized controlled trials. However, patients treated in real-world clinical practice, including elderly patients, and those with brain metastases or poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance statuses, are often excluded from these studies.

Objective

To report the final results, with a particular focus on patients enrolled in China, from a prospective phase IIIb, “near real-world” study of afatinib in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve Asian patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

NCT01953913 was conducted at 34 centers across Asia. Entry criteria were broad to reflect real-world settings. Patients received afatinib 40 mg/day until tumor progression, lack of clinical benefit, or poor tolerability. Assessments included safety, time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

541 patients were treated, of whom 412 were enrolled in China. Dose reductions were implemented in 28.7% of patients overall, and 17.7% of patients from China. Safety findings were consistent with phase III studies of afatinib. Median TTSP in all patients was 14.0 months (95% CI 12.9–15.9), and median PFS was 12.1 months (95% CI 11.0–13.6). Median TTSP (13.8 months, 95% CI 12.7–16.1) and PFS (11.4 months, 95% CI 10.9–13.7) were similar in patients from China to the overall population. Among patients from China who had dose reductions, TTSP was numerically longer than in those who did not (16.4 vs. 13.8 months; P = 0.0703), while PFS was significantly longer (13.9 vs. 11.1 months; P = 0.0275). Among patients from China with brain metastases, TTSP was numerically shorter than in those without (11.0 vs. 14.4 months; P = 0.0869), whereas PFS was significantly shorter (9.2 vs. 12.9 months; P = 0.0075).

Conclusions

Safety data for afatinib when used in a “near real-world” setting in patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC was consistent with the known safety profile of afatinib. Supporting efficacy data of afatinib were provided in all patients, and in those enrolled in China. Tolerability-guided afatinib dose reduction allowed patients to remain on treatment and continue to experience clinical benefit.

Trial Registration Number and Date of Registration

NCT01953913 (1 October 2013).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-021-00859-6.

Study of patient characteristics, treatment patterns, EGFR testing patterns and outcomes in real-world patients with EGFRm+ non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective, observational study examined patient characteristics, treatment patterns, testing patterns, and outcomes of US patients receiving first-/second- or third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

This study used an electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Eligible patients had advanced EGFRm⁺ non-small cell lung cancer. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. Logistic regression models were used to identify patient characteristics that were associated with the use of osimertinib vs. a first-/second-generation EGFR TKI. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 782 patients who received first-line (1L) therapy with first-/second-generation EGFR TKIs in cohort A, erlotinib was the most common (58%), and osimertinib was the most widely prescribed second-line (2L) therapy (52%). Of the patients who received 1L therapy with osimertinib, a greater range of treatments were prescribed in 2L. A third of patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR TKIs underwent EGFR testing near the end of 1L, and 44% of these patients had T790M positive disease. The median time on targeted therapy (TTT) of the cohort was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.7, 12.3), and the median overall survival from the start of 1L therapy was 23.5 months (95% CI 20.7, 24.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients treated with first-/second-generation EGFR TKIs went on to receive osimertinib in the 2L setting, but overall, only a third of patients had received molecular testing at progression. Improved testing frequency is vital to inform treatment decisions.

Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Evidence

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of afatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations based on real-world evidence.

Materials and Methods

Eligible real-world studies were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Cochrane guidelines were used to assess the quality of included studies. Cochran's Q test and I² statistics were used for the heterogeneity analysis.

Results

Twenty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis; nine studies were included in the qualitative descriptive analysis. The summarized disease control rate (DCR) was 87.6% (81.5%, 92.7%), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 58.9% (48.8%, 68.7%). The pooled median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 (10.3, 14.5) months, mean time to failure (TTF) was 15.4 (13.6, 17.2) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 31.6 (26.7, 36.5) months. The total incidences of adverse events (AEs) for skin rashes, diarrhea, paronychia, and mucositis were 71.4% (64.4%, 77.9%), 70.4% (60.1%, 79.8%), 52.1% (41.9, 62.3%), and 36.5% (29.5%, 43.8%), respectively. The incidences of severe adverse events (SAEs, Grade ≥3) for diarrhea, skin rashes, paronychia, and mucositis were 9.7% (6.8%, 13.1%), 5.8% (4.5%, 7.2%), 3.8% (2.0%, 6.2%), and 2.1% (1.0%, 3.6%), respectively. Differences in PFS and OS between the afatinib non-full-dose (<40 mg) and full-dose (>40 mg) groups were not significant (P > 0.05). However, the ORR in the full-dose group was 78.5% (66.7%, 88.4%), which was significantly higher than that in the non-full-dose group (67.8% [56.8%, 77.9%]).

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of afatinib has been confirmed by real-world evidence in advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation, consistent with randomized controlled trial results. In real-world setting, tolerability-guided dose adjustment might not affect the afatinib efficacy.

Treating disease progression with osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: novel targeted agents and combination strategies

A precision medicine approach has been successfully applied in medical oncology for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through the identification of targetable driver molecular aberrations; activating mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the most common. Osimertinib, a third-generation, wild-type sparing, irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), originally showed a striking activity after progression to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs when T790M resistance mutation was identified. Thereafter, upfront use of osimertinib became the standard of care based on overall survival benefit over first-generation TKIs erlotinib and gefitinib as reported in the FLAURA trial. For patients progressing on osimertinib, identification of resistance mechanisms is crucial to develop novel targeted therapeutic approaches. Moreover, innovative drugs or combination therapies are being developed for cases in which a specific resistance mechanism is not identifiable. In this review, the post-osimertinib treatment options for EGFR-mutated NSCLC are analyzed, with an outlook to ongoing clinical trials. An algorithm to guide clinicians in managing progression on osimertinib is proposed.

Sequential afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and acquired T790M: A global non-interventional study (UpSwinG)

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard of care for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, optimal sequence of treatment has yet to be defined. Overall survival (OS) is influenced by the availability/use of subsequent therapy after first-line treatment. Emergence of T790M is the main mechanism of resistance to afatinib and second-line osimertinib could be a treatment option in this instance.

METHODS

In this non-interventional, global study (NCT04179890), existing medical/electronic records were identified for consecutive EGFR TKI-naïve patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (Del19 or L858R) treated with first-line afatinib and second-line osimertinib in regular clinical practice (n = 191; all T790M-positive). The primary objective was time to treatment failure (TTF). Key secondary objectives were OS and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

At the start of afatinib treatment, median age (range) was 62 years (34-88). Fifty-five percent of patients were female and 67% were Asian. ECOG PS (0/1/≥2) was 31%/57%/12%. Fourteen percent of patients had brain metastases. At the start of osimertinib treatment, ECOG PS (0/1/≥2) was 25%/61%/14% and 14% had brain metastases (rising to 29% at the end of osimertinib treatment). The source of biopsy material (solid/liquid) was 86%/3% at the start of afatinib and 54%/33% at start of osimertinib. Mutations were mainly detected with PCR methods. Overall, median TTF was 27.7 months (95% CI: 24.0-30.2) and median OS was 36.5 months (95% CI: 32.9-41.8). ORR with afatinib and osimertinib was 74% and 45%. TTF, OS and ORR were generally consistent across subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Sequential afatinib and osimertinib demonstrated encouraging activity in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and acquired T790M. Activity was observed across all subgroups, including patients with poor ECOG PS or brain metastases. ECOG PS and incidence of brain metastases remained stable prior to, and after, afatinib treatment.

European and US Real-World Treatment Patterns in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Medical Record Review

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred first-line (1L) therapy for EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to describe real-world treatment patterns and T790M testing practices in patients with 1L disease progression (Europe/USA) following treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, non-interventional medical record review of patients with EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC from routine clinical practice (EGFR-TKI initiation: 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017; follow-up: last available medical record). Endpoints were demographic/clinical characteristics, incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases/leptomeningeal disease, second-line (2L) treatment, T790M mutation testing, and osimertinib treatment prevalence.

RESULTS

Among 469 patients, 73% (n = 341/469) progressed on 1L EGFR-TKI treatment. Of those who progressed, 74% (n = 252/341) were tested for T790M, with 50% (n = 126/252) testing positive; 75% (n = 94/126) of T790M-positive patients received osimertinib (mostly 2L). Of the patients with progression, 24% (n = 83/341) did not receive 2L treatment, and 88% (n = 73/83) of these patients died. At diagnosis of advanced disease, 9% of patients (n = 41) had CNS metastases; at EGFR-TKI initiation, 14% of patients (n = 68) had CNS metastases. Over the study period, 11% of patients (n = 42) developed CNS metastases not detected at NSCLC diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of resistance mutation testing and subsequent utilization of recommended 2L therapies could be improved. As more targeted therapies are developed, it will be crucial to improve the molecular testing rates to ensure patients receive appropriate, effective, and timely treatment.

Treatment Patterns in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Analysis of US Insurance Claims Databases

Background

Most patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) acquire resistance to first-line (1L) first- or second-generation (1G/2G) EGFR-TKIs; therefore, it is important to optimize 1L treatment to improve patient outcomes.

Objective

To retrospectively examine treatment patterns in locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC using MarketScan^® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (all US census regions).

Patients and methods

Adults with a lung cancer diagnosis code between 1 January 2015–31 March 2018 were analyzed from diagnosis (index) through a variable-length follow-up. Patients had ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for 1G/2G EGFR-TKIs on or within 60 days post-index. Data were stratified by presence or absence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (30 days pre-index through study end).

Results

578 patients were included (median age 63 years, 64% female). Median follow-up was 13.5 months. The most frequently prescribed 1L EGFR-TKI was erlotinib (414/578, 72%). Median time to 1L treatment discontinuation was 8.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9, 9.0) months in patients diagnosed with CNS metastases at any time, and 7.7 (95% CI 6.9, 8.9) months in patients without CNS metastases. 270/578 patients (47%) discontinued 1L EGFR-TKIs; 209/270 (77%) initiated second-line (2L) therapy, most frequently osimertinib (96/209, 46%).

Conclusions

In an analysis of US claims data, nearly half of patients discontinued 1L EGFR-TKIs, and 46% who initiated 2L received osimertinib. As nearly a quarter of patients who discontinued 1L EGFR-TKIs did not receive 2L treatment, this study highlights the need for optimal 1L treatment in EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-021-00272-5.

Real-world implementation of sequential targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated lung cancer

Background:

Epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFR⁺) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients failing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) can benefit from next-line targeted therapies, but implementation is challenging.

Methods:

EGFR⁺ NSCLC patients treated with first/second-generation (1G/2G) TKI at our institution with a last follow-up after osimertinib approval (February 2016), were analyzed retrospectively, and the results compared with published data under osimertinib.

Results:

A total of 207 patients received erlotinib (37%), gefitinib (16%) or afatinib (47%). The median age was 66 years, with a predominance of female (70%), never/light-smokers (69%). T790M testing was performed in 174/202 progressive cases (86%), positive in 93/174 (53%), and followed by osimertinib in 87/93 (94%). Among the 135 deceased patients, 94 (70%) received subsequent systemic treatment (43% chemotherapy, 39% osimertinib), while 30% died without, either before (4%) or after progression, due to rapid clinical deterioration (22%), patient refusal of further therapy (2%), or severe competing illness (2%). Lack of subsequent treatment was significantly (4.5x, p < 0.001) associated with lack of T790M testing, whose most frequent cause (in approximately 50% of cases) was also rapid clinical decline. Among the 127 consecutive patients with failure of 1G/2G TKI started after November 2015, 47 (37%) received osimertinib, with a median overall survival of 36 months versus 24 and 21 months for patients with alternative and no subsequent therapies (p = 0.003).

Conclusion:

Osimertinib after 1G/2G TKI failure prolongs survival, but approximately 15% and 30% of patients forego molecular retesting and subsequent treatment, respectively, mainly due to rapid clinical deterioration. This is an important remediable obstacle to sequential TKI treatment for EGFR⁺ NSCLC. It pertains also to other actionable resistance mechanisms emerging under 1G/2G inhibitors or osimertinib, whose rate for lack of next-line therapy is similar (approximately 35% in the FLAURA/AURA3 trials), and highlights the need for closer monitoring alongside broader profiling of TKI-treated EGFR⁺ NSCLC in the future.

The role of molecular heterogeneity targeting resistance mechanisms to lung cancer therapies

Introduction: The treatment scenario of lung cancer is rapidly evolving through time. In parallel, growing evidence is accumulating on different mechanisms of treatment resistance. Inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity define the spatial and temporal tumor clonal evolution, that is at the basis of tumor progression and resistance to anticancer treatments.Areas covered: This review summarizes the available evidence on molecular heterogeneity in lung cancer, from diagnosis to the occurrence of treatment resistance. The application of novel molecular diagnostic methods to detect molecular heterogeneity, and the implications of understanding heterogeneity for drug development strategies are discussed, with focus on clinical relevance and impact on patients' survival.Expert opinion: The current knowledge of molecular heterogeneity allows to identify different molecular subgroups of patients within the same conventional tumor type. Deeper understanding of heterogeneity determinants and the possibility to comprehensively investigate tumor molecular patterns will lead to the development of personalized treatment approaches, with the final goal to overcome resistance and prolong survival in lung cancer patients.

Sequential treatment of afatinib and osimertinib or other regimens in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations: Results from a real-world study in South Korea

OBJECTIVES

The optimal sequence for the administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sequential afatinib and osimertinib treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic records of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, who were administered afatinib and osimertinib (group A) or other chemotherapy (group B) between October 2014 and 2019, across 16 hospitals in South Korea were reviewed. The primary outcome, time on treatment (TOT), secondary outcome, and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 737 patients who received frontline afatinib treatment, 324 with complete records were selected (group A: 126, group B: 198). All patients in group A were T790M positive after afatinib, while patients in group B were all negative or unknown. The median TOT was 35.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.7-45.6) in group A and 20.8 months (95% CI: 19.4-24.0) in group B. The median TOT with afatinib was 13.0 months (95% CI: 12.0-13.9) overall and 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.9-17.3) in group A. The 2- and 3-year survival rates were 86.0 and 69.3% in group A and 75.9 and 55.3% in group B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Sequential afatinib and osimertinib treatment resulted in better survival rates than treatment with afatinib followed by other chemotherapies.

Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Three Phase IIIb Studies

Background

Afatinib is approved for first-line treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report findings from a combined analysis of three phase IIIb studies of afatinib in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve patients.

Methods

EGFR-TKI-naïve patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC received afatinib 40 mg/day. Dose reductions were permitted for adverse events (AEs). Efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), and tumor response. Subgroup analyses were performed by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), presence of brain metastasis, age and common/uncommon EGFR mutations (plus other factors).

Results

1108 patients were treated. Median age was 61 years (range, 25-89); 19.2% had baseline brain metastases, 4.4% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 17.9% had tumors harboring uncommon mutations. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were reported in 97.2%, most commonly diarrhea and rash. 41.6% had AEs leading to dose reduction. Median PFS was 13.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 12.0-13.8]; median TTSP was 14.8 months (95% CI: 13.9-16.1). Objective response rate (ORR) was 55.0%. Age, presence of baseline brain metastases, major (G719X, L861Q, S768I) or compound uncommon mutations had little/no effect on PFS, TTSP, or ORR, while outcomes were poorer in patients with ECOG PS 2 or exon 20 insertion/T790M mutations.

Conclusions

Afatinib was tolerable with no new safety signals. Afatinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy in a broad patient population, including those with brain metastases or uncommon EGFR mutations.

Optimal sequencing strategies in the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness

Purpose

To summarize current understanding of the efficacy, role, and cost-effectiveness of the available epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and to evaluate sequencing strategies based on the available evidence.

Summary. EGFR TKIs are the current standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Five EGFR TKIs are currently approved in the United States for use in a first-line setting; these TKIs differ in mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and cost. Most patients develop resistance to first-line EGFR TKIs and require subsequent therapy with additional EGFR TKIs, chemotherapy, and/or other targeted agents. A major consideration when selecting EGFR TKIs, both as first-line or subsequent treatment options, is cost-effectiveness. Although clinical trials have shown that the second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs are superior in efficacy to the first-generation agents, pharmacoeconomic studies suggest that the first-generation agents are the most cost-effective, with the second-generation TKI afatinib also considered cost-effective in some studies. Despite its impressive efficacy, osimertinib appears to be less cost-effective due to substantially higher acquisition costs.

Conclusion

Preliminary data suggest that first-line afatinib followed by osimertinib may offer promising survival outcomes and, on the basis of efficacy alone, may represent an optimal sequencing strategy in the majority of patients with EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC, in particular Asian patients and those with Del19-positive tumors. However, considerably more research into outcomes and costs associated with consecutive sequencing of EGFR TKIs is needed before any conclusions can be reached.

A real world analysis of first line treatment of advanced EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-center, retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

The recently published FLAURA trial demonstrated that osimertinib has remarkable efficacy in front-line setting for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While this has transformed current practice, there are no effective treatments following progression on osimertinib. The aim of our study was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients initiated on osimertinib to those started on other EGFR TKIs.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective study conducted at two large academic centers. Adult patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received EGFR therapy between 2014 and 2019 were included. Patients were dichotomized based on front-line TKI (osimertinib vs. other). PFS, OS, and time-to-discontinuation were evaluated.

RESULTS

One-hundred seventy-two patients were included in the final analysis. Fifty-two (30.2%) patients received osimertinib and 120 (69.8%) patients received another EGFR TKI. The PFS rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 86.3%, 79.5%, 69.8% in the osimertinib group and 86.6%, 64.2%, 39.3% in the other EGFR TKI group, respectively (p < 0.0036).Estimated OS at 6, 12, and 18 months was similar for both groups: 94.2%, 94.2%, 80.2% and 95.7%, 93.9%, 84.1%, respectively [Adjusted HR = 0.95 (95% CI, 0.37-2.44; p < 0.9128].

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib demonstrated greater 12 and 18 month PFS compared to other EGFR TKIs. This finding is consistent with results of the FLAURA trial. However, unlike FLAURA, there were no differences in estimated OS between the two groups in our study. Further research to evaluate optimal sequencing strategies in the real world of first, second and third generation TKIs is needed.

Osimertinib versus afatinib in patients with T790M-positive, non-small-cell lung cancer and multiple central nervous system metastases after failure of initial EGFR-TKI treatment

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of osimertinib (OSI) versus afatinib (AFA) in patients with T790M-positive, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and multiple central nervous system (CNS) metastases after failure of initial epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment.

Methods

Consecutive patients with T790M-positive NSCLC and multiple CNS metastases after failure of initial EGFR-TKI treatment were retrospectively identified from our medical institution during 2016–2018 and underwent either oral 80 daily OSI or oral 40 daily AFA every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles, until disease progression, intolerable adverse events (AEs), or death. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

The cohort consisted of 124 patients (OSI: n = 60, mean age = 64.24 years [SD: 12.33]; AFA: n = 64, mean age = 64.13 years [SD: 13.72]). After a median follow-up of 24 months (range, 3 to 28), a significant improvement in OS was detected (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.91; p = 0.0160; median, 13.7 months [95% CI, 11.1–14.8] for OSI vs 9.6 months [95% CI, 8.4–10.2] for AFA). The median duration of PFS was significantly longer with OSI than with AFA (HR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41–0.91; p = 0.014; median, 4.5 months [95% CI, 3.5–5.7] vs 3.9 months [95% CI, 3.1–4.8]). The proportion of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was lower with OSI (22.4%) than with AFA (39.4%).

Conclusions

In patients with T790M-positive NSCLC and multiple CNS metastases after failure of initial EGFR-TKI treatment, OSI may be associated with significantly improved survival benefit compared with AFA, with a controllable tolerability profile.

A multicenter cohort study of osimertinib compared with afatinib as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer from practical dataset: CJLSG1903

Background

FLAURA, the prospective trial of osimertinib as a first-line therapy compared with first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), did not show superior survival benefit for osimertinib in either the subgroup of Asians or the subgroup with the L858R mutation. In addition, the superiority of osimertinib compared with second-generation EGFR-TKI is thus far unclear.

Patients and methods

We reviewed the clinical data of all consecutive patients who were treated with osimertinib or afatinib as first-line therapy between May 2016 and October 2019 from 15 institutions in Japan. We defined the groups based on first-line EGFR-TKI as the afatinib group and the osimertinib group. Outcomes included time to discontinuation of any EGFR-TKI (TD-TKI), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure, with propensity score analysis carried out as an exploratory analysis in the survival and subgroup analyses.

Results

A total of 554 patients were enrolled. Data on 326 patients in the osimertinib group, and 224 patients in the afatinib group were analyzed. TD-TKI adjusted by propensity score in the afatinib and osimertinib groups was 18.6 months (95% confidence interval 15.8 to 22.0) and 20.5 months (95% confidence interval 13.8 to not reached), respectively, without significant difference (P = 0.204). OS adjusted by propensity score favored the afatinib group with a significant difference (P = 0.018). Subgroup analysis with propensity score showed that patients with L858R and without brain metastasis had superior survival benefit with afatinib compared with osimertinib (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

TD-TKI in the afatinib group was not significantly prolonged compared with the osimertinib group in the practical data. In the exploratory analysis of patients with L858R-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer without brain metastasis, afatinib showed more benefit in OS over osimertinib.

•

The large-scale practical data of 550 patients who were treated with osimertinib or afatinib as first-line therapy were analyzed.

•

The superiority of osimertinib compared with afatinib could not be demonstrated in all populations.

•

Osimertinib therapy showed effectiveness in patients with brain metastasis.

•

Afatinib therapy showed potential benefit in patients with L858R mutation and without brain metastasis.

The ratio of T790M to EGFR-activating mutation predicts response of osimertinib in 1st or 2nd generation EGFR-TKI-refractory NSCLC

The most frequent mechanism of resistance after 1st/2nd-generation (G) epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is secondary point mutation Thr790Met (T790M) in EGFR. Afatinib followed by osimertinib (Afa group) may provide better outcomes for T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) than 1st-G EGFR-TKI followed by osimertinib (1st-G group). We studied 111 consecutive NSCLC patients with T790M mutation treated with osimertinib after progression following 1st/2nd-G EGFR-TKI between March 28, 2016 and March 31, 2018. We analyzed the ratio of T790M to EGFR-activating mutation (T790M ratio) in post EGFR-TKI resistance re-biopsy tissue using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. And investigated whether afatinib purified the T790M mutation more than 1st-G EGFR-TKI. Among 60 patients with preserved re-biopsy tissue, we analyzed 38 having adequate DNA content. The response rate in Afa group was 81.8% (n = 11) and 1st-G group was 85.2% (n = 27). The mean T790M ratio in total population was 0.3643. The ratio in those with response to osimertinib was significantly higher than in the non-responders (0.395, 0.202; p = 0.0231) and was similar in Afa and 1st-G group (0.371, 0.362; p = 0.9693). T790M ratio significantly correlated with osimertinib response and was similar between the 1st/2nd-G EGFR-TKIs in 1st/2nd-G EGFR-TKI-refractory tumors.

Afatinib as First-Line Treatment in Asian Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC: A Narrative Review of Real-World Evidence

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) are a standard of care in the first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EGFR mutations are relatively common in Asian patients with NSCLC, and there is an increasing number of studies supporting the effectiveness of the second-generation TKI afatinib in routine clinical practice in Asia. This article reviews these real-world studies investigating afatinib as first-line treatment for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in Asian patients. Evidence from real-world studies with afatinib in this patient population supports findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing that afatinib is associated with more favorable outcomes compared with the first-generation EGFR TKIs. The effectiveness of afatinib has also been shown in real-world studies in Asian patients with poor prognostic factors, who are often under-represented or excluded from RCTs, such as those with uncommon EGFR mutations, brain metastases, or poor performance status, and elderly patients. The tolerability profile of afatinib in the real-world setting reflects that seen in RCTs, with no new safety signals reported in real-world studies in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Dose-modification strategies also seem to be effective in the real world, with results of the RealGido study, which included 44% Asian patients, confirming findings from prospective clinical trials showing that tolerability-guided afatinib dose modifications can reduce the incidence of adverse events without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. While further research, including clinical trial data, is needed, real-world data have also demonstrated the feasibility of sequential afatinib followed by the third-generation TKI osimertinib in T790M-positive EGFR mutation-positive patients, which showed longer overall survival. Together, these real-world results demonstrate the real-world clinical effectiveness of afatinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Ethacrynic Acid Enhances the Antitumor Effects of Afatinib in EGFR/T790M-Mutated NSCLC by Inhibiting WNT/Beta-Catenin Pathway Activation

Background. Despite afatinib as a new first-line treatment for EGFR L858R and exon 19 deletion or other rare EGFR-mutation patients, the acquired resistance or toxic effects associated with it limited its use clinically. The controlling of acquired resistance or optimization of the afatinib dosage in EGFR/T790M mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still an important fundamental problem. Ethacrynic acid (EA) has been proved as a dual inhibitor of GST and WNT, and the α, β-unsaturated-keto structure of it is similar to that of irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, these beneficial effects of EA combined with afatinib have never been reported in NSCLC. Therefore, the antitumor effects of afatinib combined with EA in EGFR L858R/T790M-mutated NSCLC cells and related mechanisms were analyzed. Our in vitro and in vivo results showed that EA has strong synergistic antitumor effects with afatinib in EGFR L858R/T790M-mutated NSCLC cells, but has no cytotoxic effects in NSCLC cells when used it alone, i.e., the cytotoxic effects of afatinib (IC30) plus EA (IC30) were stronger than the effects of afatinib (IC50) alone. Our functional studies found that the antitumor mechanisms of afatinib when combined with EA mainly occurred by inhibiting WNT/β-catenin pathway activation and suppression of the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors. These results revealed that combination of afatinib with EA derivatives not only provided a new therapeutic approach for EGFR/T790M-mutated NSCLC patients but also offered a new idea for developing new drugs or optimizing the dose of afatinib in clinical use in future antitumor therapy.

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: outcomes in Asian populations

Few data are available that have compared outcomes with different EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) specifically in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. In this narrative review, we have collated available data from prospective studies that have assessed first-, second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs in Asian populations, including subanalyses in individual countries (China and Japan). These data indicate that outcomes with first- and second-generation TKIs are broadly similar in Asian and non-Asian populations. However, while the third-generation EGFR TKI, osimertinib, confers significant overall survival benefit over erlotinib/gefitinib in non-Asians, this is not apparent in Asians, particularly in countries like Japan with well-resourced healthcare. Head-to-head comparisons of second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs, with OS as a primary end point, should be considered in Asia.

Upfront admixing antibodies and EGFR inhibitors preempts sequential treatments in lung cancer models

Some antibacterial therapies entail sequential treatments with different antibiotics, but whether this approach is optimal for anti-cancer tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remains open. EGFR mutations identify lung cancer patients who can derive benefit from TKIs, but most patients develop resistance to the first-, second-, and third-generation drugs. To explore alternatives to such whack-a-mole strategies, we simulated in patient-derived xenograft models the situation of patients receiving first-line TKIs. Monotherapies comprising approved first-line TKIs were compared to combinations with antibodies specific to EGFR and HER2. We observed uniform and strong superiority of all drug combinations over the respective monotherapies. Prolonged treatments, high TKI dose, and specificity were essential for drug-drug cooperation. Blocking pathways essential for mitosis (e.g., FOXM1), along with downregulation of resistance-conferring receptors (e.g., AXL), might underlie drug cooperation. Thus, upfront treatments using combinations of TKIs and antibodies can prevent emergence of resistance and hence might replace the widely applied sequential treatments utilizing next-generation TKIs.

Phase II open-label multicenter study to assess the antitumor activity of afatinib in lung cancer patients with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation from circulating tumor DNA: Liquid-Lung-A

BACKGROUND

Mutation analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is used for diagnosing lung cancer. This trial aimed to assess the efficacy of afatinib in treatment-naïve patients with lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFRm, exon 19 deletions or exon 21 point mutations) detected based on ctDNA.

METHODS

The primary objective was the objective response rate (ORR) in the response evaluable (RE) population. EGFRm analysis of ctDNA was performed using PANA Mutype. Of the 331 patients screened, ctDNA was positive in 21% (68/331) in the detection of activating EGFRm. Among 81 subjects with tumor EGFRm, 48 showed matched EGFRm in their ctDNA (59% sensitivity).

RESULTS

Therapy with afatinib 40 mg was initiated in 21 (female, 17; adenocarcinoma, 20) patients (intention-to-treat, ITT); dose modifications were made in 15 (71%). The ORR was 74% in the RE population (14/19); 11 patients showed EGFRm only in ctDNA (Group A), whereas 10 exhibited the same EGFRm in their ctDNA and tumor DNA (Group B). There was no significant difference in ORR between Groups A and B (80% and 67% RE, respectively). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months, and no significant difference was observed according to the final afatinib dose, type of EGFRm, and Group A versus B. After progression, T790M mutation was found in 40% (6/15) of patients, and osimertinib was used as a second-line treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Afatinib showed similar ORR and PFS in patients with lung cancer harboring EGFRm in their ctDNA regardless of tumor EGFRm results.

KEY POINTS

SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: Afatinib showed favorable ORR and PFS regardless of the tumor EGFR mutation status results, similar to the findings of previous trials assessing afatinib as first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer based on tumor genotyping.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Our findings emphasize that the survival benefit of afatinib treatment can be achieved not only by appropriate dose reduction with frequent and detailed monitoring of toxicities, but also by using noninvasive (ctDNA) assays in a real-world setting.

Phase I study of afatinib plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

Background

Afatinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Combination therapies with first-generation EGFR-TKIs and bevacizumab have been reported to prolong progression-free survival (PFS). However, there are few data on the combination of afatinib and bevacizumab.

Methods

In this phase I trial, we evaluated the safety of afatinib plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. This study consisted of two cohorts. In the dose-finding cohort, enrolled patients were treated with afatinib at a dose of 20, 30, or 40 mg/day (days 1-21) plus bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg (day 1) in 21-day cycles. This cohort was performed according to a 3 + 3 manner. In the expansion cohort, enrolled patients received the recommended dose (RD) based on the results of the dose-finding cohort. The serum trough concentration of afatinib was determined at the steady state.

Results

Seventeen patients were enrolled in this study (6 patients in the dose-finding cohort and 11 patients in the expansion cohort). There were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) with afatinib at a dose of 30 mg/day. With afatinib at a dose of 40 mg/day, two of two patients experienced DLTs (grade 3 diarrhea) in cycle 1. With these results, afatinib at a dose of 30 mg/day plus bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg was determined as the RD. Eleven patients in the expansion cohort were treated with the RD. Common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) with the RD were diarrhea (79%), rash (71%), perionychia (64%), and stomatitis (50%). Grade 3 AEs with the RD were diarrhea (7%), perionychia (7%), and hypertension (7%). There were no grade 4/5 AEs or cases of interstitial lung disease. Dose-proportional increases in serum afatinib trough concentrations at steady state were not observed. The response rates (RRs) and disease control rates were 55% and 100% in EGFR-TKI-naïve patients. Re-biopsy was performed in eight patients after progressive disease following the study treatment, and three patients acquired a T790M mutation.

Conclusions

Afatinib at a dose of 30 mg/day plus bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg q3w is well tolerated.

Combined assay of Circulating Tumor DNA and Protein Biomarkers for early noninvasive detection and prognosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: Early diagnosis of lung cancer is critical to curtailing cancer-related deaths. We aimed to develop a highly sensitive assay for the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the early stages. Materials and Methods: We detected EGFR and KRAS mutations in paired plasma and tumor tissue samples from 147 NSCLC patients. Of these, EGFR/KRAS ctDNA mutations and protein biomarkers were comparatively analyzed in 87 individuals. In addition, tissue samples of 20 patients were subjected to repeat multi-gene detection, and pre- and post-operative paired samples of 28 patients were subjected to multi-gene detection. Clinical information was obtained to complement the prognostic value of the combined assay results and post-operative new ctDNA mutation status. Results: EGFR/KRAS mutations were highly consistent in ctDNA and tumor DNA. Combining the detection of EGFR and KRAS mutations in ctDNA with the detection of protein biomarkers increased cancer detection sensitivity to 74.7% (65/87). None of the healthy controls tested positive using the combined assay (100% specificity). Combined assay results independently associated with recurrence-free survival. Post-operative new ctDNA mutation status independently associated with overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Conclusion: The detection of ctDNA may be exploited for early diagnosis of NSCLC, as highlighted by the developed assay. Further, the combined assay results and post-operative new ctDNA mutation status are promising prognostic indicators in NSCLC patients.

Benefits and limitations of real-world evidence: lessons from EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evidence-based medicine, they do not always reflect real-world patient populations, limiting their generalizability and external validity. Real-world evidence (RWE), generated during routine clinical practice, is increasingly important in determining effectiveness outside of the tightly controlled conditions of RCTs, and is now recognized by regulatory bodies as a valuable complement to RCTs. Consequently, it is increasingly important for physicians to understand how RWE data can be used alongside clinical trial data. Here, we discuss the different types of real-world observational studies, outline the benefits and limitations of RWE, and, using examples from EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, outline how RWE can be used to help inform treatment decisions.

Impact of the generation of EGFR-TKIs administered as prior therapy on the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M mutation

Background

There are few studies that directly compare the effects of osimertinib on patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation between the generation of prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from the medical records of consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who had developed resistance to first‐ or second‐generation EGFR‐TKIs due to EGFR T790M mutation and were subsequently treated with osimertinib at Juntendo University Hospital. In patients with available tumor samples, target amplicon sequencing analyses were performed to explore the genetic biomarkers.

Results

A total of 38 patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR T790M mutation were treated with osimertinib. Eight patients were classified into group A (afatinib followed by osimertinib) and 30 patients were classified into group B (first‐generation EGFR‐TKI followed by osimertinib). Progression‐free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in group A than in group B (median PFS; not reached vs. 11.0 months, P = 0.018). Fourteen patients had available tissue samples collected before osimertinib treatment for target sequencing. In group A we found no additional mutations, other than EGFR T790M mutation. On the other hand, there were three samples in which other mutations emerged, in addition to EGFR T790M mutation, in group B.

Conclusions

PFS of osimertinib was significantly longer in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR T790M mutation after treatment with afatinib than in patients after treatment with first generation EGFR‐TKIs. Additional mutations other than EGFR T790M may affect the efficacy of osimertinib treatment.

Key points

Significant findings of the study:

PFS of osimertinib was significantly longer in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR T790M mutation after treatment with afatinib than in patients after treatment with first generation EGFR‐TKIs.

What this study adds:

Additional mutations other than EGFR T790M may affect the efficacy of osimertinib treatment.

Optimizing therapy sequence to prevent patient attrition in EGFR mutation-positive advanced or metastatic NSCLC

Clinical trial and real-world data in non-small-cell lung cancer indicate that 10-60% of patients that progressed on first- or second-generation EGFR-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) do not receive systemic second-line therapy. In our article, we discuss efficacy, safety and treatment duration with different EGFR-TKIs and stress the need for delivery of the most efficacious therapy in the first-line. We also provide our perspective on analysis of circulating tumor DNA and the role of EGFR-TKI in combined therapies. Finally, we review new therapeutic options to overcome resistance to EGFR-TKI. We believe that overall treatment duration and access to different medications in subsequent lines of therapy should be considered when planning the optimal treatment strategy.

Afatinib for the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in China: a review of clinical data

Mutations in the EGFR gene are particularly prevalent among Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Six EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are approved for the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung carcinoma in China, which poses questions about which agent is most suitable for a particular patient. In this article, we review available clinical trial and real-world data with afatinib in Chinese patients. We assess its efficacy and safety in key patient subgroups such as those with uncommon mutations or brain metastases. We also consider possible subsequent therapies following afatinib. Encouragingly, available data suggest that sequential afatinib and osimertinib confer prolonged overall time to failure of almost 4 years in Asian patients, and represents a viable option in this setting.

Sequential afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: final analysis of the GioTag study

Aim: Final overall survival (OS) and time on treatment analysis of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib. Patients & methods: Patients (n = 203) had T790M-positive disease following first-line afatinib and started osimertinib treatment ≥10 months before data entry. Primary outcome was time on treatment; OS analysis was exploratory. Results: Median time on treatment with afatinib and osimertinib was 27.7 months (90% CI: 26.7-29.9). Median OS was 37.6 months (90% CI: 35.5-41.3); median OS was 41.6 and 44.8 months in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients, respectively. Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice, sequential afatinib and osimertinib was associated with encouraging outcomes in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, especially in Del19-positive patients and Asian patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03370770 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Making the case for EGFR TKI sequencing in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: a GioTag study US patient analysis

Aim: To assess time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in US patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib-osimertinib treatment in the global, observational GioTag study. Patients & methods: Patients had EGFR T790M mutation-positive disease after first-line afatinib and subsequently received osimertinib. The primary outcome was TTF. Results: In 129 patients at US centers, median TTF was 28.4 months (90% CI: 27.0-34.1). Median overall survival was 47.6 months (90% CI: 35.5-51.5). Conclusion: Sequential afatinib-osimertinib in this US-treated population was associated with long median TTF and represents an effective, evidence-based treatment option for US patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC not presenting with active brain metastases or de novo T790M. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03370770 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Propensity score analysis of overall survival between first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs using real-world data

We constructed a data set of EGFR‐mutant non–small‐cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients, and compared the overall survival of first‐generation (1G), and second‐generation (2G) EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in clinical practice using a propensity score. We reviewed the clinical data of consecutive EGFR‐mutated NSCLC patients who received EGFR‐TKI therapy between January 2008 and August 2017 at 11 institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). When comparing OS between 1G and 2G EGFR‐TKIs, propensity score analyses were performed using 2 methods: matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). (Clinical Trial information: UMIN000030121) In total, 1400 patients from 11 institutions were enrolled in this study, and the data from the 1366 patients who received only EGFR‐TKI therapy were analyzed (gefitinib [GEF], N = 732; erlotinib [ERL], N = 416; afatinib, N = 218). Median OS times (months [95%CI]) were 29.7 [27.5‐33.5] in the 1G group (gefitinib, 32.0 [28.1‐35.8]; erlotinib, 27.5 [23.9‐31.7]), and 38.6 [32.2‐NR] in the 2G group (afatinib), respectively. The trend of longer OS for afatinib against 1G EGFR‐TKIs remained, even after adjusted by propensity score. (unadjusted, hazard ratio [HR] 0.676, P = .0023; adjusted by IPTW, HR 0.685 P < .0001; adjusted by matching, HR 0.725, P = .0418). Exploratory analysis showed that OS using the 2G EGFR‐TKI was superior to that of the 1G EGFR‐TKIs, suggesting the potential of sequential therapy of 2G EGFR‐TKI followed by osimertinib. (HR 0.419, P = .0519) Real‐world data analysis using 1354 data records, using propensity scoring, indicated that 2G EGFR‐TKI had a trend of longer OS compared with 1G EGFR‐TKIs.

Budget impact of sequential treatment with first-line afatinib versus first-line osimertinib in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with common EGFR mutations

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic landscape for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients that have common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has changed radically in the last decade. The availability of these treatment options has an economic impact, therefore a budget impact analysis was performed.

METHODS

A budget impact analysis was conducted from a Dutch healthcare perspective over a 5-year time horizon in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients receiving first-line afatinib (Gilotrif^®) versus first-line osimertinib (Tagrisso^®), followed by subsequent treatments. A decision analysis model was constructed in Excel. Scenario analyses and one-way sensitivity analysis were used to test the models' robustness.

RESULTS

Sequential treatment with afatinib versus first-line treatment with osimertinib showed mean total time on treatment (ToT) of 29.1 months versus 24.7 months, quality-adjusted life months (QALMs) of 20.2 versus 17.4 with mean cost of €108,166 per patient versus €143,251 per patient, respectively. The 5-year total budget impact was €110.4 million for the afatinib sequence versus €158.6 million for the osimertinib sequence, leading to total incremental cost savings of €48.15 million.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line afatinib treatment in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC had a lower financial impact on the Dutch healthcare budget with a higher mean ToT and QALM compared to osimertinib sequential treatment.

Phase II Study of Low-Dose Afatinib Maintenance Treatment Among Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: North Japan Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1601 (NJLCG1601)

LESSONS LEARNED

Low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC achieved long-time to treatment failure with fewer treatment-related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy. This modified regimen represents a practical usage that balances effectiveness and safety.

BACKGROUND

Although afatinib is an effective therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), drug-related adverse events (AEs) have often necessitated dose reductions. In a post hoc analysis of the LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials, there was no difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) between patients who had the dose of afatinib reduced and those who did not. We thus evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment among patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who had not been previously treated.

METHODS

Eligible patients received afatinib 40 mg orally once daily. When prescribed grade ≥ 2 AEs, rash of grade ≥ 3, or unacceptable toxicity occurred, the afatinib dose was reduced from 40 to 30 mg and if needed from 30 to 20 mg. The primary endpoint was the 1-year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Among 30 patients, 93% had adenocarcinoma, 53% had exon 19 deletion, 37% had L858R, and 10% had minor mutations. The 1-year PFS rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.3-66.1) and the median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI, 7.1-21.4). The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 toxicities was 57%, including elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase level (13%), diarrhea (10%), and paronychia (10%).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose afatinib maintenance treatment reduced treatment-related AEs without detracting from the therapeutic efficacy.

Non-small cell lung cancer patients with ex19del or exon 21 L858R mutation: distinct mechanisms, different efficacies to treatments

With the development of antitumor therapies, different treatment methods including monotherapy and combined therapy have achieved clinical efficacy in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Exon 19 deletion (ex19del) and exon 21 L858R mutation are common sensitive subtypes of EGFR mutation. However, potential distinct mechanisms are found from several dimensions including molecular structures, biological behaviors, concomitant mutations, resistance mechanisms and tumor mutation burdens. More evidence indicates the prognostic difference of EGFR subgroups. This review focused on the progress of potential distinct mechanisms and outcomes in clinical trials of advanced NSCLC patients with ex19del or exon 21 L858R mutation.

Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer with mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor in Colombia

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sequences starting with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), afatinib and osimertinib, for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive (Exon 19 deletion or L858R) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stages IIIB - IV in Colombia.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was designed, using information from global and progression-free survival curves. For first and second-generation TKI, second line treatment was assumed according to the presence of T790M mutation to define the use of osimertinib or chemotherapy. The cost of the states without progression and post-progression was estimated using the base case approach, identified through consultation with clinical experts.

RESULTS

The cost of treatment starting with afatinib in the first line was of 222,247 USD (1 USD = 3171.99 COP) and produced 1.36 QALYs. The strategy with afatinib was dominant with respect to that of first line TKI (227,289 USD and 1.34 QALY). The strategy with osimertinib resulted in more QALYs and higher costs, with ICERs of 35,062 USD, exceeding the current willingness to pay threshold for Colombia.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment starting with afatinib in the first line is dominant with respect to the strategy with first line TKI. The ICER of osimertinib sequence exceeds the threshold when compared with afatinib one.

Mutational spectrum of acquired resistance to reversible versus irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background

Over the past years, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) revolutionized treatment response. 1st-generation (reversible) EGFR TKI and later the 2nd –generation irreversible EGFR TKI Afatinib were aimed to improve treatment response. Nevertheless, diverse resistance mechanisms develop within the first year of therapy. Here, we evaluate the prevalence of acquired resistance mechanisms towards reversible and irreversible EGFR TKI.

Methods

Rebiopsies of patients after progression to EGFR TKI therapy (> 6 months) were targeted to histological and molecular analysis. Multiplexed targeted sequencing (NGS) was conducted to identify acquired resistance mutations (e.g. EGFR p.T790M). Further, Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was applied to investigate the status of bypass mechanisms like, MET or HER2 amplification.

Results

One hundred twenty-three rebiopsy samples of patients that underwent first-line EGFR TKI therapy (PFS ≥6 months) were histologically and molecularly profiled upon clinical progression. The EGFR p.T790M mutation is the major mechanism of acquired resistance in patients treated with reversible as well as irreversible EGFR TKI. Nevertheless a statistically significant difference for the acquisition of T790M mutation has been identified: 45% of afatinib- vs 65% of reversible EGFR TKI treated patients developed a T790M mutation (p-value 0.02). Progression free survival (PFS) was comparable in patients treated with irreversible EGFR irrespective of the sensitising primary mutation or the acquisition of p.T790M.

Conclusions

The EGFR p.T790M mutation is the most prominent mechanism of resistance to reversible and irreversible EGFR TKI therapy. Nevertheless there is a statistically significant difference of p.T790M acquisition between the two types of TKI, which might be of importance for clinical therapy decision.

EGFR mutation testing and treatment decisions in patients progressing on first- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate real-world EGFR mutation testing in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) upon progression on first−/second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), and subsequent treatments received.

Methods

Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived database was used to identify adult patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with first−/second-generation EGFR-TKI from 11/2015–09/2017, with start of first EGFR-TKI defined as the index date. Patients were stratified by receipt of EGFR-TKI as first-line (1 L) or later-line (2 L+) treatment. Mutation testing and subsequent therapies following first−/second-generation EGFR-TKI were described.

Results

Overall, 782 patients (1 L = 435; 2 L+ =347) were included. Median age was 69.0 years, 63.6% were female, 56.3% were white, 87.1% were treated in community-based practices, and 30.1% of patients died during the study period; median follow-up was 309.0 days. Among the 294 (1 L = 160; 2L+ =134) patients who received subsequent therapies, treatments included chemotherapy only (1 L = 15.6%; 2L+ =21.6%), immunotherapy only (1 L = 13.8%; 2 L+ =41.0%), and targeted therapies (1 L = 70.0%; 2 L+ =36.6%). Specifically, 40 (25.0%) 1 L patients and 7 (5.2%) 2 L+ patients received osimertinib as subsequent therapy. Before the start of subsequent therapy, EGFR T790M resistance mutation testing was performed in 88 (29.9%) patients (1 L = 63 [39.4%]; 2 L+ =25 [18.7%]). Of these patients, 25 (28.4%) were T790M positive, among whom 24 (96.0%) received osimertinib.

Conclusions

A third of patients received subsequent therapies on disease progression; only 30% of these were tested for EGFR-TKI resistance mutation, prior to receiving subsequent therapies. These results highlight the importance of choosing treatments in the 1 L setting that optimize benefits for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Safety and efficacy of first-line dacomitinib in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

In a subgroup of Japanese patients in the ARCHER 1050 randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety and determined the effects of dose modifications on adverse events (AE) and therapy management of first-line oral dacomitinib 45 mg compared with oral gefitinib 250 mg, each once daily in 28-d cycles, in patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive (EGFR-positive; exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST, version 1.1, by blinded independent review). In 81 Japanese patients (40 dacomitinib, 41 gefitinib), PFS was longer with dacomitinib compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.544 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.307-0.961]; 2-sided P = .0327; median 18.2 for dacomitinib [95% CI, 11.0-31.3] mo, 9.3 [95% CI, 7.4-14.7] mo for gefitinib). The most common Grade 3 AEs were dermatitis acneiform with dacomitinib (27.5%) and increased alanine aminotransferase with gefitinib (12.2%). A higher proportion of patients receiving dacomitinib (85.0%) compared with gefitinib (24.4%) had AEs leading to dose reduction. Incidence and severity of diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, stomatitis and paronychia were generally reduced after dacomitinib dose reductions and dacomitinib treatment duration was generally longer in patients with a dose reduction in comparison with those without a dose reduction. Our results confirmed the efficacy and safety of first-line dacomitinib in Japanese patients with EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC.

Canadian consensus: a new systemic treatment algorithm for advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Multiple clinical trials for the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) have recently been reported. As a result, the treatment algorithm has changed, and many important clinical questions have been raised:■ What is the optimal first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutated nsclc?■ What is preferred first-line treatment for patients with brain metastasis?■ What is the preferred second-line treatment for patients who received first-line first- or second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (tkis)?■ What is the preferred treatment after osimertinib?■ What evidence do we have for treating patients whose tumours harbour uncommon EGFR mutations?

Methods

A Canadian expert panel was convened to define the key clinical questions, review recent evidence, and discuss and agree on practice recommendations for the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated nsclc.

Results

The published overall survival results for osimertinib, combined with its central nervous system activity, have led to osimertinib becoming the preferred first-line treatment for patients with common EGFR mutations, including those with brain metastasis. Other agents could still have a role, especially when osimertinib is not available or not tolerated. Treatment in subsequent lines of therapy depends on the first-line therapy or on T790M mutation status. Treatment recommendations for patients whose tumours harbour uncommon EGFR mutations are guided mainly by retrospective and limited prospective evidence. Finally, the evidence for sequencing and combining tkis with chemotherapy, angiogenesis inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, and other new therapeutics is reviewed.

Conclusions

This Canadian expert consensus statement and algorithm were driven by significant advances in the treatment of EGFR-mutated nsclc.