Sarcoma patients' quality of life from diagnosis to yearly follow-up: experience from an Italian tertiary care center

Quality of life and emotional distress in sarcoma patients diagnosed during COVID-19 pandemic: a supplementary analysis from the SarCorD study

Background

The COVID-19 outbreak had a negative psychological impact on cancer patients. In this study, we analyzed emotional distress and quality of life in patients diagnosed with sarcoma during the first year of the pandemic compared to the previous year.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled patients with soft tissue, bone sarcoma, and aggressive benign musculoskeletal diseases diagnosed during the pandemic (COVID group) or the year before (control group) at the IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute in Rome. Patients who had undergone a psychological assessment with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Distress Thermometer at diagnosis were included in the final analysis. We analyzed whether there is a difference in the various domains of quality of life between the two groups and whether there are changes over time in each group.

Results

We enrolled 114 patients (72 control group; 42 COVID group), affected by soft tissue (64%), bone sarcoma (29%), and aggressive benign musculoskeletal diseases (7%). We did not observe significant differences in the health-related quality of life domains in the control and COVID groups, except for the financial domain (p = 0.039), with 9.7% vs. 23.8% of patients with a score > 0 in the control and COVID groups, respectively. We observed emotional distress at diagnosis in 48.6% of patients in the control group vs. 69.0% in the COVID group (p = 0.034). In the control group, we observed an improvement in physical function (p = 0.043) and in QoL (p = 0.022), while in the COVID group, we observed a deterioration in role function (p = 0.044) during follow-up. In the COVID group, 22.2% of patients were concerned about COVID-19, 61.1% by tumor, 91.1% stated that the pandemic worsened their subjective perception of cancer, and 19.4% perceived that their quality of care had worsened.

Conclusion

We observed a higher level of distress among patients diagnosed during the pandemic compared to the year before, probably due to the increased concern for both infection and cancer, the worsened perception of health status, and the perception of a poorer quality of health care.

Bone sarcoma follow-up; a nationwide analysis of oncological events after initial treatment

Aim

Follow-up strategies for high-grade bone sarcomas have been optimized to facilitate early detection of local recurrence and distant metastasis. The ideology is that early detection enables early treatment presuming better survival. However, the clinical value for each individual patient remains questionable. This study aims to evaluate oncological events after initial treatment in order to assess current follow-up strategies for high-grade bone sarcomas in the Netherlands.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on a national registry. All cases were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Our study consisted of 393 patients treated between 2007 and 2011 with complete follow-up data. Baseline characteristics were analysed for all entities. Local recurrence and distant metastasis was analysed along with overall survival for high-grade chondrosarcoma, high-grade osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and chordoma.

Results

Median follow-up was 8,3 years for high-grade chondrosarcoma, 4,9 for high-grade osteosarcoma, 3,8 for Ewing sarcoma and 7,5 for chordoma. Median time to local recurrence and distant metastasis was 1,2 years for high-grade osteosarcoma and 1,5 years for Ewing sarcoma. For high-grade osteosarcoma with localized disease at presentation, 0.09 new distant metastatic events per patient per year were seen after five years of follow-up with 11,1 patients needed to follow-up for any event. Five-year overall survival was 60,0% for high-grade chondrosarcoma, 50,0% for high-grade osteosarcoma, 45,3% for Ewing sarcoma and 71,4% for chordoma.

Conclusions

This nationwide study shows a plateau in local recurrences and distant metastatic events after four years of treatment for patients with high-grade osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. Due to a lack of reliable evidence however, we were not able to provide additional guidance on follow-up intervals and duration. Collaborative research with larger groups is needed in order to provide a solid scientific recommendation for follow-up in the heterogenous patient population with bone sarcoma.

Symptoms and their implications on quality of life and psychological distress in sarcoma patients

The aim of this study was to investigate symptoms, their variation over time and their relationship with quality of life (QoL)/psychological distress in sarcoma patients, as few data regarding QoL and psychological distress in this set of patients are currently available. A total of 188 sarcoma patients from an Italian referral center were involved. Symptoms and financial difficulties were evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire from the first treatment and over the follow-up period, up to 6 years. The authors found that patients with sarcoma experience several symptoms, especially fatigue and pain, which may dramatically worsen QoL and psychological distress. In conclusion, patients with sarcoma often experience fatigue, pain and financial difficulties, which negatively impacts QoL and psychological distress. To ameliorate overall QoL, proper control of symptoms is necessary.

Evaluating the Impact of Surveillance Follow-Up Intervals in Patients Following Resection of Primary Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma of the Retroperitoneum

BACKGROUND

Resection of recurrent retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma (RP-WDLPS) is unlikely to result in cure. Thus, most clinicians delay surgery after recurrence until symptom intolerance or increasing rate of disease progression. The aim of this study was to determine whether longer surveillance intervals in this population would impact outcomes or delay treatment in those who recur.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with primary RP-WDLPS who underwent resection between April 1996 and April 2017 and surveillance at MDACC (n = 91) was performed.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis of primary RP-WDLPS was 61 years; median tumor size was 30 cm. Complete resection was achieved in 85 (93.4%) patients. Among patients who underwent complete resection, recurrence occurred in 53 (60.2%) with median time to recurrence of 27.0 months. Thirty-six (69.6%) of these patients underwent resection of recurrent disease at a median 40.2 months from primary tumor resection. Surveillance imaging at 4-month (vs 3-month) intervals would not have impacted recurrence management in 84 (95.5%) patients; imaging at 6-month (vs 3-month) intervals would not have impacted management of recurrence in 80 (90.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence was common, often occurring beyond the early postoperative period following primary RP-WDLPS resection. More frequent surveillance imaging (q3-4 vs q6 months) in the first 2 years following primary RP-WDLPS resection may not significantly impact timing of surgery or systemic therapy for recurrence. If longer surveillance intervals were shown to be safe with equivalent outcomes in prospective studies, the resulting change in practice could lead to decreased anxiety and cost for patients and healthcare systems.