Tofacitinib in the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis in adults

Herb-drug interaction between Shaoyao-Gancao-Fuzi decoction and tofacitinib via CYP450 enzymes

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY RELEVANCE

Shaoyao-Gancao-Fuzi decoction (SGFD), a well-known traditional Chinese medicine formula, was originally described in "Treatise on Febrile Diseases" and has been extensively used to dispel wind, eliminate dampness and treat paralysis. It is widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in clinic. However, the effect of SGFD on the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP450s) and the herb-drug interactions are rarely studied.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of SGFD on the activity of CYP450s and evaluate the potential herb-drug interactions between SGFD and tofacitinib, commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in rheumatoid arthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cocktail approach was employed to assess the effect of SGFD on the activity of CYP1A2, 3A4, 2A6, 2E1, and 2C9. The pharmacokinetic profile of oral administration of tofacitinib in rats after two weeks of treatment with SGFD was investigated. RT-qPCR and molecular docking were performed to unveil the underlying mechanism of the herb-drug interaction.

RESULTS

SGFD had no effect on the activities of CYP2E1 and 2C9, had a weak effect on CYP2A6, and had activatory effect on CYP1A2. However, it had a dramatically inhibitory effect on the activity of CYP3A4. Simultaneously, the values of C_max and AUC_0-∞ of tofacitinib were obviously increased after treatment with SGFD for 14 days. The mechanism study manifested that SGFD significantly reduced the gene transcription of CYP3A. Molecular docking work confirmed that the inhibitory activity of glycyrrhetinic acid, glycyrrhizic acid and liquiritin, the main ingredients of SGFD, occurred by occupying the active sites of CYP3A4 and by making favorable interactions with its key residues.

CONCLUSIONS

The system exposure of tofacitinib was increased by SGFD. SGFD could affect the activity and gene expression of the key metabolic enzyme CYP3A. These findings give a clear understanding to predict herb-drug interaction of SGFD for safe clinical use in future.

Topical Administration of 0.3% Tofacitinib Suppresses M1 Macrophage Polarization and Allograft Corneal Rejection by Blocking STAT1 Activation in the Rat Cornea

Purpose

M1 macrophages can promote corneal allograft rejection (CGR). Inhibiting M1 macrophage polarization by the JAK/STAT1 pathway may be a new strategy to prevent CGR. Tofacitinib, a potent pan-JAK inhibitor, can inhibit JAK/STAT activation. Here, we investigated the inhibitory effects of tofacitinib on M1 macrophage polarization and its therapeutic effect on rat CGR.

Methods

Corneal allograft transplantation was performed and administrated with 0.3% tofacitinib in rats. The corneal allografts were assessed clinically. The corneas were detected for M1 macrophages, lymphatic vessels, and inflammatory cytokine expression using immunohistochemistry and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Dendritic cells (DCs) in ipsilateral cervical lymph nodes were detected by flow cytometry. The effect and mechanism of tofacitinib on macrophages were explored by real-time PCR, enzyme-linked immunoassay, and western blot analysis in vitro.

Results

The results showed that topical administration of 0.3% tofacitinib significantly prolonged corneal graft survival. Tofacitinib-treated corneal allografts displayed a proportionate decrease in M1 macrophages and reduced lymphatic vessel density with fewer DCs in rat ipsilateral cervical lymph nodes. Tofacitinib reduced the mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines, including iNOS, MCP-1, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and VEGF-C, and inhibited STAT1 activation in rat corneal grafts. In addition, tofacitinib suppressed M1 macrophage polarization via STAT1 activation after IFN-γ and lipopolysaccharide stimulation in vitro.

Conclusions

Tofacitinib could suppress M1 macrophage polarization and subsequently delay CGR by inhibiting STAT1 activation. The data indicate that tofacitinib is an effective drug for CGR.

Translational Relevance

This study provided evidence that topical administration of 0.3% tofacitinib may be a novel clinical strategy to prevent CGR.

Tofacitinib versus tocilizumab in the treatment of biological-naïve or previous biological-failure patients with methotrexate-refractory active rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

To compare effectiveness between tofacitinib and tocilizumab treatments for biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve patients or previous bDMARD-failure patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate (MTX).

Methods

We used two ongoing real-world registries of patients with RA who had first started tofacitinib or tocilizumab between August 2013 and February 2019 at our institutions. Clinical disease activity index (CDAI)-based improvements at 12 months were used for comparisons between tofacitinib and tocilizumab treatments, separately for bDMARD-naïve and previous bDMARD-failure patients.

Results

A total of 464 patients with RA with high or moderate CDAI were enrolled (247 with tofacitinib and 217 with tocilizumab). After adjustments for treatment-selection bias by propensity score matching, we showed that tofacitinib was more likely to induce and maintain ≥85% improvement in CDAI (CDAI85), CDAI70 and remission at 12 months compared with tocilizumab in bDMARD-naïve patients. After adjusting for concurrent use of MTX and prednisolone, the ORs of tofacitinib versus tocilizumab were 3.88 (95% CI 1.87 to 8.03) for CDAI85, 2.89 (95% CI 1.43 to 5.84) for CDAI70 and 3.31 (95% CI 1.69 to 6.48) for remission. These effects were not observed in bDMARD-failure patients. In tofacitinib treatment for bDMARD-failure patients, the number of previously failed bDMARD classes was not associated with CDAI-based improvements. The rate of overall adverse events was similar between both treatments. Similar ORs were obtained from patients adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Conclusions

Compared with tocilizumab, tofacitinib can induce greater improvements during the first 12-month treatment in bDMARD-naïve patients, but this difference was not observed in previous bDMARD-failure patients.

Current and Emerging DMARDs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most prevalent form of inflammatory arthritis. It is a profoundly serious and severe disease that if it goes untreated could have severe consequences to the joints and health of the patient who carries this diagnosis. The treatment of RA has dramatically changed since the year 2000, with the discovery of the TNFis, then other biologics, and finally the JAKi. All these new medications with or without methotrexate in combination, tight control and treat to target have produced a revolution in the outcome of this disease. We reviewed and summarized the treatment options, and the most significant papers for each one of these new drugs. The reader could have a full picture with all the references of the recent publications. We also updated the biosimilar situation in RA, as well as the new drugs that will be coming to the market in the next 5 years.

Effects of naringenin on the pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib in rats

Context: Naringenin and tofacitinib are often used together for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese clinics.Objective: This experiment investigates the effect of naringenin on the pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib in rats.Materials and methods: Twelve Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups (experimental group and control group). The experimental group was pre-treated with naringenin (150 mg/kg/day) for two weeks before dosing tofacitinib, and equal amounts of CMC-Na solution in the control group. After a single oral administration of 5 mg/kg of tofacitinib, 50 μL blood samples were directly collected into 1.5 mL heparinized tubes via the caudal vein at 0.083, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h. The plasma concentration of tofacitinib was quantified by UPLC/MS-MS.Results: Results indicated that naringenin could significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib. The AUC_0-24 of tofacitinib was increased from 1222.81 ± 222.07 to 2016.27 ± 481.62 ng/mL/h, and the difference was significant (p < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the T_max was increased from 0.75 ± 0.29 to 3.00 ± 0.00 h (p < 0.05), and the MRT_(0-24) was increased from 4.90 ± 0.51 to 6.57 ± 0.66 h (p < 0.05), but the clearance was obviously decreased from 4.10 ± 0.72 to 2.42 ± 0.70 L/h/kg (p < 0.05) in experimental group. Although the C_max and t_1/2 of tofacitinib were increased, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05).Conclusions: This research demonstrated a drug-drug interaction between naringenin and tofacitinib possibly when preadministered with naringenin; thus, we should pay attention to this possibility in the clinic.

Modeling Combined Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Dexamethasone and Tofacitinib in Arthritic Rats

Tofacitinib (TOF), a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, which was approved in 2012, has been recommended for the treatment of clinically active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Dexamethasone (DEX), a potent corticosteroid, is also used in RA therapy but with limited usefulness due to dose- and time-dependent adverse effects. This pilot study examines the single and combined effects of DEX and TOF in order to explore the steroid-sparing potential of TOF. Collagen-induced arthritic (CIA) rats were subcutaneously (SC) dosed with vehicle, 1.5 mg/kg TOF, 5 mg/kg TOF, 0.225 mg/kg DEX, or a combination of 1.5 mg/kg TOF and 0.225 mg/kg DEX. Paw sizes were measured as an index of disease and drug efficacy and dynamically depicted using a logistic function for natural paw growth, a turnover model for disease progression, an indirect response model for inhibitory effects of TOF and DEX and a non-competitive interaction model for the combined effect of DEX and TOF. TOF alone exerted only a slight inhibitory effect on RA paw edema compared to DEX, which reduced edema by 40%. In combination, TOF and DEX had additive effects with an interaction factor of 0.76. Using model simulations, a single SC dose of TOF does not have a visible steroid-sparing potential, although BID oral dosing has such potential. The current study suggests an additive effect of TOF and DEX and simulations indicate that further exploration of TOF and DEX administration timing may produce desirable drug efficacy with lower DEX doses.

Tofacitinib in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: position statement of experts of the Polish Society for Rheumatology

Tofacitinib is a newly approved small-molecule targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. The drug was designed as a selective and specific inhibitor of pro-inflammatory receptor signalling. Tofacitinib inhibits the process of intracellular signalling from the receptor to the cellular nucleus and inhibits the inflammation process via a new pathway (inhibition of the Janus kinases), which is unavailable to biological medicines. Tofacitinib has been approved for use in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe active RA. The drug may be used in combination with methotrexate or another conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or in monotherapy. The efficacy of tofacitinib has been confirmed in several clinical trials. The drug inhibits radiographic progression of the disease. The innovative mechanism of action of tofacitinib is a noteworthy feature because it offers hope of effective treatment for patients who fail to respond to other drugs. The presented article discusses the mechanism of action and the clinical application of tofacitinib. Tofacitinib represents a new group of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs that can be placed on an equal footing with biological drugs already available.

JAK inhibitors for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms and other disorders

JAK inhibitors have been developed following the discovery of the JAK2V617F in 2005 as the driver mutation of the majority of non- BCR-ABL1 myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Subsequently, the search for JAK2 inhibitors continued with the discovery that the other driver mutations ( CALR and MPL) also exhibited persistent JAK2 activation. Several type I ATP-competitive JAK inhibitors with different specificities were assessed in clinical trials and exhibited minimal hematologic toxicity. Interestingly, these JAK inhibitors display potent anti-inflammatory activity. Thus, JAK inhibitors targeting preferentially JAK1 and JAK3 have been developed to treat inflammation, autoimmune diseases, and graft-versus-host disease. Ten years after the beginning of clinical trials, only two drugs have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration: one JAK2/JAK1 inhibitor (ruxolitinib) in intermediate-2 and high-risk myelofibrosis and hydroxyurea-resistant or -intolerant polycythemia vera and one JAK1/JAK3 inhibitor (tofacitinib) in methotrexate-resistant rheumatoid arthritis. The non-approved compounds exhibited many off-target effects leading to neurological and gastrointestinal toxicities, as seen in clinical trials for MPNs. Ruxolitinib is a well-tolerated drug with mostly anti-inflammatory properties. Despite a weak effect on the cause of the disease itself in MPNs, it improves the clinical state of patients and increases survival in myelofibrosis. This limited effect is related to the fact that ruxolitinib, like the other type I JAK2 inhibitors, inhibits equally mutated and wild-type JAK2 (JAK2WT) and also the JAK2 oncogenic activation. Thus, other approaches need to be developed and could be based on either (1) the development of new inhibitors specifically targeting JAK2V617F or (2) the combination of the actual JAK2 inhibitors with other therapies, in particular with molecules targeting pathways downstream of JAK2 activation or the stability of JAK2 molecule. In contrast, the strong anti-inflammatory effects of the JAK inhibitors appear as a very promising therapeutic approach for many inflammatory and auto-immune diseases.