Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus apatinib in advanced liver carcinosarcoma: a case report

PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: Current research in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy has shown encouraging outcomes in breast cancer (BC) treatment in recent years. The programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) transmembrane protein is suggested to function as a co-inhibitory factor in the immune response, where it collaborates with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) to stimulate apoptosis, suppress cytokine release from PD-1 positive cells, and limit the growth of PD-1 positive cells. Furthermore, in many malignancies, PD-L1 reduces the immune system's response to neoplastic cells. These observations suggest that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis plays a vital role in cancer therapy and the regulation of cancer immune escape mechanisms. This review aimed to provide an overview of the functions of PD-1 and PD-L1 in BC cancer therapy.

METHODS

This research design is a literature review. The style is a traditional review on topics or variables relating to the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. A literature search was carried out using three online databases.

RESULTS

The search using the keywords yielded a total of 248 studies. Each result was filtered again according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in a final total of 4 studies to be included in the literature review.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 is essential for many malignancies. According to the evidence presented, this combination presents both an opportunity and a challenge in cancer treatment. Since many solid cancers, especially BC, express high levels of PD-1/PD-L1, cancer treatment mainly involves targeted therapies.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib versus sorafenib/placebo in first-line treatment for intermediate and advanced primary liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Apatinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For decades, sorafenib has been a classic first-line treatment option for patients with HCC. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib versus sorafenib/placebo as first-line treatment for intermediate and advanced primary liver cancer (PLC). Methods: A literature search was performed via PubMed, Web of Science, CENTRAL, Embase, CNKI, VIP, and CBM. Data extraction from databases of other languages is not restricted. The Cochrane risk of bias tool, modified Jadad scale, Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), and non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool were employed to evaluate methodological qualities in original studies. Influence analysis was applied to assess the reliability of pooled results. Publication bias was evaluated using the funnel plot with Begg's test and Egger's test. Results: Seven studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one clinical controlled trial (CCT) were used for comparing apatinib with placebo, and two retrospective clinical studies (RCSs) were used for comparing apatinib with sorafenib. Apatinib led to higher overall effects in objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and mean survival time (MST) over placebo (RR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.46-2.81, p < 0.0001, I² = 0%; RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.04-1.33, p = 0.009, I² = 45.8%; SMD = 2.63; 95% CI = 1.47-3.78, p < 0.0001, I² = 92.7%, respectively). Compared to sorafenib, apatinib showed no superiority in ORR and DCR but was inferior in the 6-month and 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.85-4.65, p = 0.111, I² = 68.3%; RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.73-1.47, p = 0.840, I² = 0.0%; RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.42-0.97, p = 0.036, I² = 0.0%; RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.29-0.79, p < 0.0001, I² = 0.0%, respectively). Apatinib had similar adverse effects over placebo but possessed a greater incidence rate of proteinuria and hypertension over sorafenib. Conclusion: In the first-line setting, apatinib might be an alternative treatment approach for patients with intermediate and advanced PLC. Sorafenib alone showed a better survival rate within 1 year and a lower incidence rate in hypertension and proteinuria than apatinib monotherapy.

Targeted therapies and checkpoint inhibitors in sarcoma

Sarcomas are defined as a group of mesenchymal malignancies with over 100 heterogeneous subtypes. As a rare and difficult to diagnose entity, micrometastasis is already present at the time of diagnosis in many cases. Current treatment practice of sarcomas consists mainly of surgery, (neo)adjuvant chemo- and/or radiotherapy. Although the past decade has shown that particular genetic abnormalities can promote the development of sarcomas, such as translocations, gain-of-function mutations, amplifications or tumor suppressor gene losses, these insights have not led to established alternative treatment strategies so far. Novel therapeutic concepts with immunotherapy at its forefront have experienced some remarkable success in different solid tumors while their impact in sarcoma remains limited. In this review, the most common immunotherapy strategies in sarcomas, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy and cytokine therapy are concisely discussed. The programmed cell death (PD)-1/PD-1L axis and apoptosis-inducing cytokines, such as TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), have not yielded the same success like in other solid tumors. However, in certain sarcoma subtypes, e.g. liposarcoma or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, encouraging results in some cases when employing immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with other treatment options were found. Moreover, newer strategies such as the targeted therapy against the ancient cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) may represent an interesting approach worth investigation in the future.

The efficacy and safety of Apatinib combined with TACE in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Background

The timely and effective treatments are vital to the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and the role of Apatinib combined with TACE in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Apatinib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on Apatinib and TACE use in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, China Biomedical Literature Database, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Database, and Weipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database were searched up to 16 April 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan 5.3 software was used for Meta-analysis. This meta-analysis protocol had been registered online (available at: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2021-6-0047/).

Results

A total of 14 RCTs involving 936 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were included. The objective remission rate (OR = 2.93, 95% CI 2.17–3.95), 1-year survival (OR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.65–3.68), 2-year survival (OR = 2.67, 95% CI 1.41–5.04), the incidence of hand-foot syndrome (OR = 32.09, 95% CI 10.87–94.74) and the incidence of proteinuria (OR = 14.79, 95% CI 6.07–36.06) of the Apatinib + TACE group was significantly higher than that of the TACE group (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of myelosuppression (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.61–1.67), the incidence of hypertension (OR = 7.56, 95% CI 0.95–1.67, P = 60.17) between Apatinib + TACE and TACE group (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Apatinib combined with TACE is more effective than TACE alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, but it has certain adverse reactions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-021-02451-8.

Sarcomatoid carcinoma in the sinonasal cavity: A retrospective case series from a single institution

OBJECTIVES

Sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC) is rare in the sinonasal cavity with poor prognosis. This study aimed to summarize the clinical characteristics, treatment and prognosis of patients with sinonasal SC from a single tertiary medical center.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the clinical data of seven patients diagnosed with sinonasal SC from May 1988 to February 2021.

RESULTS

Seven patients with SC in nasal cavity and paranasal sinus, including six males and one female, aged 34-77 years (mean, 58.3 years), were included in this case series. The common presenting symptoms included epistaxis and nasal obstruction. The tumor usually occurred in nasal cavity, maxillary sinus and ethmoid sinus. Most patients were diagnosed at advanced stages with the involvement of orbit and skull base. Open and endoscopic surgery were performed in five and two patients, respectively. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 26 months. Four patients died of disease within one year, though two received adjuvant chemotherapy and one received radiotherapy. Two patients survived without recurrence at the end of follow-up, both of them underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. One patient received palliative re-irradiation due to local recurrence of the tumor three months after the surgery, however, this patient was lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Sinonasal SC is a rare entity with an aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Early diagnosis and multimodality treatment are recommended to improve the survival.

Emerging Role of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Chronic Liver Diseases

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand (L)1, the immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a promising strategy for the treatment of various diseases including chronic liver diseases (CLDs) such as hepatitis, liver injury and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The role of PD-1/PD-L1 has been widely inspected in the treatment of viral hepatitis and HCC. PD-1 is known to play a crucial role in inhibiting immunological responses and stimulates self-tolerance by regulating the T-cell activity. Further, it promotes apoptosis of antigen-specific T-cells while preventing apoptosis of Treg cells. PD-L1 is a trans-membrane protein which is recognized as a co-inhibitory factor of immunological responses. Both, PD-1 and PD-L1 function together to downregulate the proliferation of PD-1 positive cells, suppress the expression of cytokines and stimulate apoptosis. Owing to the importance of PD-1/PD-L1 signaling, this review aims to summarize the potential of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in CLDs along with toxicities associated with them. We have enlisted some of the important roles of PD-1/PD-L1 in CLDs, the clinically approved products and the pipelines of drugs under clinical evaluation.

Primary Liver Sarcomatoid Carcinoma: A Case Series and Literature Review

Background

Primary liver sarcomatoid carcinoma (PLSC) is rare. To improve the understanding of PLSC, cases were described and reviewing the literature.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 14 cases of PLSC diagnosed by pathology in Northeastern China from 2010 to 2020. An individual participant data analysis based on reported cases was conducted to determine epidemiological characteristics, clinical characteristics, and prognoses of PLSC.

Results

A total of 136 cases involved our 14 cases and 122 cases from previous reports. The percentages of sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, sarcomatoid cholangiolocellular carcinoma, and mixed and unclassified types were 36.8%, 41.9%, 5.9%, and 15.4%, respectively. A total of 95.6% PLSC was found in Asia. There was a lower percentage of hepatitis-infected patients in Japan, when compared with the Republic of Korea (38.5% vs 70.0%, P<0.05). Five cases were initially misdiagnosed as a hepatic abscess by imaging. A total of 36.7% cases had metastases when being diagnosed, and 68.9% cases relapsed during the follow-up. The median disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 3 months and 5 months, respectively. Only radical surgery (hazard ratio = 0.308, 95% confidence interval 0.186–0.512, P<0.001) indicated a better OS.

Conclusion

PLSC was more prevalent in Asia and there were possibilities of misdiagnoses. Surgery is still an effective treatment and can significantly prolong the OS. Only limited strategies for recurrent or advanced PLSC, immunotherapy may be possible treatment.

Case Report: Low-Dose Apatinib in the Treatment of Intrahepatic Biliary Cystadenoma With Recurrence and Malignant Transformation

Apatinib is a new oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. It has been proven effective in treating multiple solid tumors. Herein, we report the case of a 67-year-old Chinese patient who was diagnosed with recurrent and malignant transformation of intrahepatic biliary cystadenoma. After multidisciplinary team discussion, the team considered that the remaining liver volume was insufficient for surgical resection. The patient refused chemotherapy and radiotherapy and was willing to take apatinib. Initially, the patient experienced severe tongue ulcers and difficulty eating. The dose of apatinib was then adjusted to 250 mg/day. To date, he has been taking apatinib for 48 months. Regular re-examination showed that the tumor had significantly decreased in size. On January 16, 2021, a CT scan revealed a tumor diameter of 4.5 cm. In our case, the patient achieved partial response and progression-free survival(PFS) of 48.0 months. During treatment, the patient’s appetite and mental state were expected. The treatment did not induce hypertension, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, or liver and kidney damage. Apatinib may be an option for the treatment of advanced intrahepatic biliary cystadenocarcinoma. Its toxicity is controllable and tolerable. The exact curative effect still needs to be evaluated in more cases.

The Safety and Efficacy of Camrelizumab and Its Combination With Apatinib in Various Solid Cancers

Background: Camrelizumab (SHR1210) is a high-affinity, humanized immunoglobulin programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody. It was developed by Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co. Ltd. and has been approved for relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients and hepatocellular carcinoma patients in China. Apatinib is an orally administered vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) tyrosine kinase inhibitor and has been approved for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma in China. Camrelizumab alone and its combination with apatinib have been used in the treatment of various solid cancers.

Methods: We searched Embase, PubMed, and other databases with the keyword “camrelizumab” or “SHR1210,” and evaluated the safety and efficacy data of the involved studies. Adverse events (AEs) mentioned in at least two studies were summarized, including any grade and grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs. Meanwhile, efficacy data were collected, such as overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, median PFS time, 12-month overall survival rate, and median overall survival time.

Results: The major AEs of camrelizumab alone were reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation, fatigue, aspartate aminotransferase increase, proteinuria, pruritus, and alanine transaminase increase. The ORR and DCR were 20.2% (95% CI: 15.1–26.6%, p = 0.000, I² = 70.360) and 45.8% (95% CI: 39.0–52.7%, p = 0.256, I² = 58.661), respectively. In the three studies of combination therapy, two studies were combined with apatinib and one combined with chemotherapy. For these studies, common AEs were hypertension, platelet count decrease, nausea, proteinuria, aspartate aminotransferase increase, and white blood cell count decrease. The pooled ORR, DCR, and 6-month PFS rate were 41.8% (95% CI: 29.7–54.9%, p = 0.220, I² = 86.265), 82.4% (95% CI: 75.9–87.4%, p = 0.000, I² = 55.207), and 56.2% (95% CI: 35.8–74.6%, p = 0.559, I² = 79.739), respectively.

Conclusion: Camrelizumab and its combination are tolerable and appear to be efficient in treating numerous solid cancers. The combination therapy appears to have better efficacy with durable toxicity. However, these remain to be shown in future studies. Besides, baseline lactate dehydrogenase, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutation burden, and the incidence of reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation may be efficacy predictors and need to be clarified in further studies.

The Clinicopathological and Imaging Characteristics of Primary Hepatic Carcinosarcoma and a Review of the Literature

Purpose

To improve the understanding of hepatic carcinosarcoma (HCS) by analyzing radiological imaging data and clinicopathological features.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on four patients with HCS confirmed immunohistochemically. The analysis included three males and one female, aged 29 to 64 years. Four patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans, and one underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans simultaneously.

Results

Three patients had a history of hepatitis B, cirrhosis or fibrosis, and two patients had schistosomiasis. Two cases tested positive for elevated serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19–9. The maximum diameters of the lesions ranged from 7.8 to 9.0cm. Pathologically, the carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements in two patients could not be classified, one of the patients had cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) and undifferentiated sarcoma, the other had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS). All tumors showed heterogeneous density/intensity, accompanied by vast cystic changes and necrosis, with two cases having cystic septations. Capsule formation was not identified. The margins of the radiological images showed irregular ring enhancement. One case presented continuous progressive enhancement, one case with “fast in fast washout” and two cases with “fast in late washout”. Lymphonodus metastasis, satellite nodules, vascular embolism, and organ invasion (hepatic flexure of the colon) were identified.

Conclusion

HCS is a rare, high-grade malignancy with poor prognosis. The preoperative diagnosis is expected to improve by carefully analyzing the imaging features of the patients in combination with their clinical characteristics. Radical resection and postoperative chemoradiotherapy can improve the survival rate of patients.

Adverse Events of Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Antiangiogenic Agents: A Systematic Review

Background: Immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized the treatment of multiple malignancies. Currently, however, the effect is not universal, with objective response rates (ORR) of about 15–25%, and even lower for some cancers. Abnormal vasculature is a hallmark of most solid tumors and plays a role in immune evasion. Growing body of evidence suggests that vascular normalization and immune reprogramming could operate synergistic effect, resulting in an enhanced therapeutic efficacy. However, the benefit of antitumor efficacy must be weighed against the risk of added toxicity. In this systematic review, we summarize severe toxicity observed in such a kind of combination regimen.

Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for English references published up to May 31, 2019, with MeSH and keywords search terms of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic agents approved for using in solid tumors. Studies performing concomitant use of ICIs and antiangiogenic agents, and also reporting severe treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) (≥grade 3), were included for further analysis.

Results: A total of 32 studies including a total of 2,324 participants were analyzed. Limited available data suggests that both antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show potential risk of increasing treatment-related toxicity when combined with ICIs. Overall, the total incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) associated with ICIs plus mAbs (44.5%) is lower than that of ICIs plus TKIs (60.1%). However, the trAEs observed in combination therapy are mostly consistent with the known safety profiles of corresponding monotherapy, and they seem to be largely related to antiangiogenic agents, rather than a true immune-related adverse event (irAE) predominantly due to ICIs. The majority of trAEs are intervened by holding ICI treatment and adding corticosteroids, as well as reducing dose or adjusting administration frequency of the antiangiogenic drugs.

Conclusions: Concurrent use of ICIs and antiangiogenic agents shows potential treatment-related toxicity. Further research is required to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination regimen and corresponding monotherapy and identify predictive biomarkers, as well as explore dose, duration, and sequencing schedules of drugs.