The emergence of neoadjuvant therapy in advanced melanoma

Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapies in Cutaneous Melanoma

Melanoma is the most common cause of skin cancer-related death in the United States. Cutaneous melanoma is most prevalent in the head and neck. The long-term prognosis has been poor and chemotherapy is not curative. Complete surgical resection with locally advanced disease can be challenging and melanoma is resistant to radiation. Advances made in immunotherapy and genomically targeted therapy have transformed the treatment of metastatic melanoma; as of 2021, the 5-year survival for metastatic melanoma is greater than 50%. Ongoing clinical studies are underway to integrate these life-saving therapies into the presurgical or postsurgical settings. This article reviews that effort.

Preclinical Evaluation of LVR01 Attenuated Salmonella as Neoadjuvant Intralesional Therapy in Combination with Chemotherapy for Melanoma Treatment

Treatment of malignant melanoma has improved in the last few years owing to early detection and new therapeutic options. Still, management of advanced disease remains a challenge because it requires systemic treatment. In such cases, dacarbazine-based chemotherapy has been widely used, despite low efficacy. Neoadjuvant therapies emerge as alternative options that could help chemotherapy to achieve increased benefit. In this work, we evaluate LVR01, an attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium, as neoadjuvant intralesional therapy in combination with dacarbazine in a preclinical melanoma model. B16F1 melanoma‒bearing mice received intraperitoneal administration of dacarbazine for 3 consecutive days. LVR01 treatment, consisting of one single intratumoral injection, was applied 1 day before chemotherapy began. This therapeutic approach retarded tumor growth and prolonged overall survival, revealing a strong synergistic antitumor effect. Dacarbazine induced a drastic reduction of secondary lymphoid organ cellularity, which was partially restored by Salmonella, particularly potentiating activated cytotoxic cell compartments. Systemic immune reactivation could be a consequence of the intense inflammatory tumor microenvironment induced by LVR01. We propose that the use of LVR01 as neoadjuvant intralesional therapy could be considered as an interesting strategy with close clinical application to boost chemotherapy effect in patients with melanoma.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is reshaping cancer management across multiple tumour types: The future is now!

The Italian Network for Tumor Biotherapy (Network Italiano per la Bioterapia dei Tumori [NIBIT]) Foundation hosted its annual 2020 Think Tank meeting virtually, at which representatives from academic, clinical, industry, philanthropic, and regulatory organisations discussed the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of cancer. Although the number of neoadjuvant immunotherapeutic trials is increasing across all malignancies, the Think Tank focused its discussion on the status of neoadjuvant trials in cutaneous melanoma (CM), muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Neoadjuvant developments in CM are nothing short of trailblazing. Pathologic Complete Response (pCR), pathologic near Complete Response, and partial Pathologic Responses reduce 90-100% of recurrences. This is in sharp contrast to targeted therapies in neoadjuvant CM trials, where only a pCR seems to reduce recurrence. The pCR rate after neoadjuvant immunotherapy varies among the different malignancies of CM, MIBC, HNSCC, and PDAC and may be associated with different reductions of recurrence rates. In CM, emerging evidence suggests that neoadjuvant immunotherapy with anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD1 is a game changer in patients with palpable nodal Stage III or resectable Stage IV disease by curing more patients, reducing recurrences and the need for surgical interventions, such as lymph node dissections and metastasectomies. The Think Tank panel discussed future approaches on how to optimise results across different tumour types. Future approaches should include reducing monocyte-mediated (tumour-associated macrophages) and fibroblast-mediated (cancer-associated fibroblasts) barriers in the tumour microenvironment to facilitate the recruitment of immune cells to the tumour site, to reduce immune-suppressive mediators, and to increase antigen presentation at the site of the tumour.

Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and High-Dose IFNα-2b in Resectable Regionally Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy may improve the clinical outcome of regionally advanced operable melanoma and allows for rapid clinical and pathologic assessment of response. We examined neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and high-dose IFNα-2b (HDI) therapy in patients with resectable advanced melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma were treated with concurrent pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks and HDI 20 MU/m²/day i.v., 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then 10 MU/m²/day subcutaneously 3 days per week for 2 weeks. Definitive surgery followed, as did adjuvant combination immunotherapy, completing a year of treatment. Primary endpoint was safety of the combination. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), pathologic complete response (pCR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Blood samples for correlative studies were collected throughout. Tumor tissue was assessed by IHC and flow cytometry at baseline and at surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were enrolled, and 30 were evaluable. At data cutoff (October 2, 2019), median follow-up for OS was 37.87 months (range, 33.2-43.47). Median OS and RFS were not reached. Radiographic ORR was 73.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 55.5-85.8], with a 43% (95% CI: 27.3-60.1) pCR rate. None of the patients with a pCR have had a recurrence. HDI and pembrolizumab were discontinued in 73% and 43% of patients, respectively. Correlative analyses suggested that intratumoral PD-1/PD-L1 interaction and HLA-DR expression are associated with pCR (P = 0.002 and P = 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant concurrent HDI and pembrolizumab demonstrated promising clinical activity despite high rates of treatment discontinuation. pCR is a prognostic indicator.See related commentary by Menzies et al., p. 4133.

Decreased Expression of CPEB3 Predicts a Poor Prognosis in Patients with Melanoma: A Study Based on TCGA Data

Aim

Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein 3 (CPEB3) has been acknowledged as a tumor-suppressive gene in several cancers; however, there are few reports on the clinical significance of CPEB3 in melanoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of CPEB3 in predicting the prognosis of melanoma patients.

Methods

The association of CPEB3 expression and clinical pathologic features was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data set. The role of CPEB3 expression in prognosis was also analyzed. In addition, CPEB3 expression-related pathways were enriched by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Association analysis of CPEB3 gene expression and immune infiltration was performed by ssGSEA.

Results

The mRNA was significantly less in melanoma than in normal tissues (p < 0.001). The decrease in CPEB3 expression in melanoma was significantly correlated with T staging (p < 0.001), clinical staging (p = 0.029), melanoma Clark level (p = 0.014), and melanoma ulceration (p = 0.003), while it was marginally significant in N staging (p = 0.089). Melanoma with low CPEB3 expression was associated with worse OS (overall survival), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) than in that with high expression. In the univariate analysis, expression of CPEB3, melanoma ulceration, Clark level of melanoma, age, clinical stage, T stage, and N stage were correlated with OS (p < 0.05). Further analysis by multivariate Cox regression showed that N stage (p = 0.029), melanoma ulceration (p = 0.004), and CPEB3 expression (p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of OS in melanoma. Moreover, GSEA showed that several pathways were enriched in CPEB3, such as PD1 signaling, CTLA4 pathway, CTCF pathway, CHEMOKIN signaling, VEGF signaling, and JAK-STAT pathway. CPEB3 was significantly correlated with the infiltration level of B cells (p < 0.001), T cells (p < 0.001), T helper cells (p < 0.001), and central memory T (Tcm) cells (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

CPEB3 may be a potential prognostic marker in melanoma with poor survival. Moreover, PD1 signaling, CTLA4 pathway, CTCF pathway, CHEMOKIN signaling, VEGF signaling, and JAK-STAT pathway may be the key pathway regulated by CPEB3. Moreover, the expression of CPEB3 in melanoma is related to the level of immune infiltration.

Targeting Tumor-Associated Macrophages to Increase the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Glimpse into Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Metastatic Melanoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a promising therapeutic intervention for a variety of advanced/metastatic solid tumors, including melanoma, but in a large number of cases, patients fail to establish a sustained anti-tumor immunity and to achieve a long-lasting clinical benefit. Cells of the tumor micro-environment such as tumor-associated M2 macrophages (M2-TAMs) have been reported to limit the efficacy of immunotherapy, promoting tumor immune evasion and progression. Thus, strategies targeting M2-TAMs have been suggested to synergize with immune checkpoint blockade. This review recapitulates the molecular mechanisms by which M2-TAMs promote cancer immune evasion, with focus on the potential cross-talk between pharmacological interventions targeting M2-TAMs and ICIs for melanoma treatment.

Circulating Tumour DNA Is an Independent Prognostic Biomarker for Survival in Metastatic BRAF or NRAS-Mutated Melanoma Patients

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can be used to identify gene alterations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the detection of ctDNA, based on the identification of BRAF and NRAS mutations before systemic treatment initiation, was associated with the prognosis of metastatic melanoma. In total, 68 BRAF or NRAS-mutated stage IV or unresectable stage III metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients were included and tested for the presence of BRAF and NRAS mutations in circulating DNA before treatment initiation, using the Cobas BRAF/NRAS Mutation Test (Roche). The expected mutation was detected in the plasma of 34/68 patients (50% sensitivity). ctDNA detection was associated with AJCC stage, along with the number and nature of metastases. ctDNA was less frequently detected in NRAS-mutated than in BRAF-mutated melanoma (36% and 66%, respectively). At initiation of first-line treatment, ctDNA detection was associated with poor prognosis in Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) in univariate analysis (log-rank: p = 0.002 and p < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, ctDNA detection was an independent factor of poor prognosis in OS, after adjustment for AJCC stage, number and nature of metastases and gender (HR = 4.384; 95% CI: (1.308; 14.699); p = 0.017).

Oncology Nurse Coordinators in Clinical Trials - Shaking up the Melanoma Team

In recent years, melanoma research has undergone a renaissance. The disease that was once viewed, at least in a metastatic setting, as intractable and untreatable is now revealing its molecular “weaknesses.” The year 2011 was a landmark year for melanoma therapy, with the introduction of two new agents – the anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibody ipilimumab and the BRAF (V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1) inhibitor vemurafenib. These two agents were shown to confer a survival benefit, which was followed by the approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In 2014, other immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, were approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. By 2019, the FDA had also approved pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy. Target therapy and immunotherapy are now the standard of care for melanoma patients. Clinical trials are currently ongoing for new neoadjuvant therapies. Rapidly evolving knowledge will perhaps downgrade melanoma to the level of a chronic, manageable disease from the intractable “black cancer,” it was in the past and a disease that struck fear into the hearts of those who were diagnosed. Changes in immunotherapy treatments were followed by a large volume of clinical trials. This situation has resulted in the need for changes in the roles of existing melanoma multidisciplinary team members, including the clinical trials nurse (CTN). The role of the CTN is not suitable for these new conditions. A new role and tasks need to be established, evolving the CTN into an oncology nurse coordinator (ONC). In this article, we have described the role and responsibilities of an ONC and the changes that have taken place within the multidisciplinary melanoma team.