Automated Quantitative CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Tumor Mutation Burden as Independent Biomarkers in Melanoma Patients Receiving Front-Line Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) predicts response to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. However, there remains no standardized method to assess CD8+ TIL in melanoma, and developing a specific, cost-effective, reproducible, and clinically actionable biomarker to anti-PD-(L)1 remains elusive. We report on the development of automatic CD8+ TIL density quantification via whole slide image (WSI) analysis in advanced melanoma patients treated with front-line anti-PD-1 blockade, and correlation immunotherapy response.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors in the front-line setting between January 2015 and May 2023 at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute were included. CD8+ TIL density was quantified using an image analysis algorithm on digitized WSI. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed to determine tumor mutation burden (TMB) in a subset of 62 patients. ROC curves were used to determine biomarker cutoffs and response to therapy. Correlation between CD8+ TIL density and TMB cutoffs and response to therapy was studied.

RESULTS

Higher CD8+ TIL density was significantly associated with improved response to front-line anti-PD-1 across all time points measured. CD8+ TIL density ≥222.9 cells/mm2 reliably segregated responders and non-responders to front-line anti-PD-1 therapy regardless of when response was measured. In a multivariate analysis, patients with CD8+ TIL density exceeding cutoff had significantly improved PFS with a trend toward improved OS. Similarly, increasing TMB was associated with improved response to anti-PD-1, and a cutoff of 14.70 Mut/Mb was associated with improved odds of response. The correlation between TMB and CD8+ TIL density was low, suggesting that each represented independent predictive biomarkers of response.

CONCLUSIONS

An automatic digital analysis algorithm provides a standardized method to quantify CD8+ TIL density, which predicts response to front-line anti-PD-1 therapy. CD8+ TIL density and TMB are independent predictors of response to anti-PD-1 blockade.

Identification of tumor-intrinsic drivers of immune exclusion in acral melanoma

Acral melanoma (AM) has distinct characteristics as compared with cutaneous melanoma and exhibits poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Tumor-intrinsic mechanisms of immune exclusion have been identified in many cancers but less studied in AM. We characterized clinically annotated tumors from patients diagnosed with AM at our institution in correlation with ICI response using whole transcriptome RNAseq, whole exome sequencing, CD8 immunohistochemistry, and multispectral immunofluorescence imaging. A defined interferon-γ-associated T cell-inflamed gene signature was used to categorize tumors into non-T cell-inflamed and T cell-inflamed phenotypes. In combination with AM tumors from two published studies, we systematically assessed the immune landscape of AM and detected differential gene expression and pathway activation in a non-T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME). Two single-cell(sc) RNAseq AM cohorts and 11 bulk RNAseq cohorts of various tumor types were used for independent validation on pathways associated with lack of ICI response. In total, 892 specimens were included in this study. 72.5% of AM tumors showed low expression of the T cell-inflamed gene signature, with 23.9% of total tumors categorized as the non-T cell-inflamed phenotype. Patients of low CD3+CD8+PD1+ intratumoral T cell density showed poor prognosis. We identified 11 oncogenic pathways significantly upregulated in non-T cell-inflamed relative to T cell-inflamed TME shared across all three acral cohorts (MYC, HGF, MITF, VEGF, EGFR, SP1, ERBB2, TFEB, SREBF1, SOX2, and CCND1). scRNAseq analysis revealed that tumor cell-expressing pathway scores were significantly higher in low versus high T cell-infiltrated AM tumors. We further demonstrated that the 11 pathways were enriched in ICI non-responders compared with responders across cancers, including AM, cutaneous melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Pathway activation was associated with low expression of interferon stimulated genes, suggesting suppression of antigen presentation. Across the 11 pathways, fatty acid synthase and CXCL8 were unifying downstream target molecules suggesting potential nodes for therapeutic intervention. A unique set of pathways is associated with immune exclusion and ICI resistance in AM. These data may inform immunotherapy combinations for immediate clinical translation.

Identification of tumor-intrinsic drivers of immune exclusion in acral melanoma

Background

Acral melanoma (AM) has distinct characteristics as compared to cutaneous melanoma and exhibits poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Tumor-intrinsic mechanisms of immune exclusion have been identified in many cancers but less studied in AM.

Methods

We characterized clinically annotated tumors from patients diagnosed with AM at our institution in correlation with ICI response using whole transcriptome RNAseq, whole exome sequencing, CD8 immunohistochemistry, and multispectral immunofluorescence imaging. A defined interferon-γ-associated T cell-inflamed gene signature was used to categorize tumors into non-T cell-inflamed and T cell-inflamed phenotypes. In combination with AM tumors from two published studies, we systematically assessed the immune landscape of AM and detected differential gene expression and pathway activation in a non-T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME). Two single-cell(sc) RNAseq AM cohorts and 11 bulk RNAseq cohorts of various tumor types were used for independent validation on pathways associated with lack of ICI response. In total, 892 specimens were included in this study.

Results

72.5% of AM tumors showed low expression of the T cell-inflamed gene signature, with 23.9% of total tumors categorized as the non-T cell-inflamed phenotype. Patients of low CD3 + CD8 + PD1 + intratumoral T cell density showed poor prognosis. We identified 11 oncogenic pathways significantly upregulated in non-T cell-inflamed relative to T cell-inflamed TME shared across all three acral cohorts (MYC, HGF, MITF, VEGF, EGFR, SP1, ERBB2, TFEB, SREBF1, SOX2, and CCND1). scRNAseq analysis revealed that tumor cell-expressing pathway scores were significantly higher in low vs high T cell-infiltrated AM tumors. We further demonstrated that the 11 pathways were enriched in ICI non-responders compared to responders across cancers, including acral melanoma, cutaneous melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Pathway activation was associated with low expression of interferon stimulated genes, suggesting suppression of antigen presentation. Across the 11 pathways, fatty acid synthase and CXCL8 were unifying downstream target molecules suggesting potential nodes for therapeutic intervention.

Conclusions

A unique set of pathways is associated with immune exclusion and ICI resistance in AM. These data may inform immunotherapy combinations for immediate clinical translation.

Dietary tryptophan metabolite released by intratumoral Lactobacillus reuteri facilitates immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment

The use of probiotics by cancer patients is increasing, including among those undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. Here, we elucidate a critical microbial-host crosstalk between probiotic-released aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist indole-3-aldehyde (I3A) and CD8 T cells within the tumor microenvironment that potently enhances antitumor immunity and facilitates ICI in preclinical melanoma. Our study reveals that probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri (Lr) translocates to, colonizes, and persists within melanoma, where via its released dietary tryptophan catabolite I3A, it locally promotes interferon-γ-producing CD8 T cells, thereby bolstering ICI. Moreover, Lr-secreted I3A was both necessary and sufficient to drive antitumor immunity, and loss of AhR signaling within CD8 T cells abrogated Lr's antitumor effects. Further, a tryptophan-enriched diet potentiated both Lr- and ICI-induced antitumor immunity, dependent on CD8 T cell AhR signaling. Finally, we provide evidence for a potential role of I3A in promoting ICI efficacy and survival in advanced melanoma patients.

Microbiome-derived metabolites counteract tumor-induced immunosuppression and boost immune checkpoint blockade

The tumor and gut microbiome regulate antitumor immunity and modulate responses to immune checkpoint blockade, although the mechanisms of action remain uncertain. A recent study in Science Immunology by Mirji et al. describes that the microbiota-generated metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) plays a critical role in mediating the effects of the microbiome on antitumor immunity.

Phase I trial of pembrolizumab plus vemurafenib and cobimetinib in patients with metastatic melanoma

Background

Preclinical and translational evidence suggest BRAF/MEK inhibitors modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME), providing rationale for combination with immunotherapy.

Methods

This investigator-initiated, phase I trial evaluated pembrolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib in patients with untreated, BRAFV600E/K mutant advanced melanoma. The first 4 patients received vemurafenib with pembrolizumab, and the next 5 patients received vemurafenib and cobimetinib with pembrolizumab. Primary endpoints: safety and maximum tolerated dose of the triplet.

Secondary endpoints

objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL). The trial was closed after enrollment of 9 (planned 30) patients due to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Study NCT02818023 was approved by the IRB, and all patients provided informed consent.

Results

Patients received a median of 6 cycles of therapy. 8 of 9 experienced drug-related grade 3/4 AEs. DLTs included dermatitis (n=8), hepatitis (n=1), QTc prolongation (n=1), and arthralgias (n=1 each). QoL assessments identified a clinically significant decrease in self assessed QoL at 1 year compared to baseline (0.38 v 0.43). Median PFS was 20.7 months and median OS was 23.8 months for vemurafenib with pembrolizumab. Median PFS and OS were not reached for patients receiving triple therapy. ORR in the overall cohort was 78% (7/9). 2 patients experienced a complete response, 5 had a partial response, 1 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease. 4 patients had ongoing responses at data analysis. Peripheral blood flow cytometry identified significantly decreased PD1 expression on CD4+ T-cells at 3 and 9 weeks compared to baseline, not corresponding to clinical response.

Conclusions

Triple therapy with vemurafenib, cobimetinib and pembrolizumab is associated with high response rates but significant adverse events, leading to early study closure.

Facts and Hopes for Gut Microbiota Interventions in Cancer Immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death 1 (PD-1) proteins transformed the management of advanced cancers. Many tumor-intrinsic factors modulate immunological and clinical responses to such therapies, but ample evidence also implicates the gut microbiome in responses. The gut microbiome, comprising the bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses that live in the human digestive tract, is an established determinant of host immunity, but its impact on response to ICI therapy in mice and humans with cancer has only recently been appreciated. Therapeutic interventions to optimize microbiota composition to improve immunotherapy outcomes show promise in mice and humans with cancer. In this review, we discuss the rationale for gut microbiome-based cancer therapies, the results from early-phase clinical trials, and possible future developments.

Predicting cancer immunotherapy response from gut microbiomes using machine learning models

Cancer immunotherapy has significantly improved patient survival. Yet, half of patients do not respond to immunotherapy. Gut microbiomes have been linked to clinical responsiveness of melanoma patients on immunotherapies; however, different taxa have been associated with response status with implicated taxa inconsistent between studies. We used a tumor-agnostic approach to find common gut microbiome features of response among immunotherapy patients with different advanced stage cancers. A combined meta-analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing data from our mixed tumor cohort and three published immunotherapy gut microbiome datasets from different melanoma patient cohorts found certain gut bacterial taxa correlated with immunotherapy response status regardless of tumor type. Using multivariate selbal analysis, we identified two separate groups of bacterial genera associated with responders versus non-responders. Statistical models of gut microbiome community features showed robust prediction accuracy of immunotherapy response in amplicon sequencing datasets and in cross-sequencing platform validation with shotgun metagenomic datasets. Results suggest baseline gut microbiome features may be predictive of clinical outcomes in oncology patients on immunotherapies, and some of these features may be generalizable across different tumor types, patient cohorts, and sequencing platforms. Findings demonstrate how machine learning models can reveal microbiome-immunotherapy interactions that may ultimately improve cancer patient outcomes.

Study design of a global molecular disease characterization initiative (MDCI) in oncology clinical trials

e13598

Background: Current clinical trial selection for patients with independent screening for each trial, results in high screen failure and limited options for ineligible patients. MDCI’s concept for patient screening centers around broad molecular analysis and one screening protocol for multiple trials to increase patient inclusion and shorten recruitment time for oncology clinical trials.. Methods: MDCI was designed in collaboration with patients, physicians and study sites. Feedback from the Oncology Patient Council (OPC) was solicited beginning at study conception with input on study design, the informed consent form and the Gather Share Know participant portal. Patients provided specific detailed feedback and user acceptance throughout development to ensure a truly patient-focused approach. To track implementation of feedback, the MDCI team developed a document, which was shared with OPC, recording all feedback received and all actions taken by the study team. Feedback from study sites led to additional flexibility for visits (ie, combining study visits 1 and 2; allowing for telehealth visits for visit 3) and collection of data on medical history and prior therapies to streamline the screening process. Physician input included the acceptance of next generation sequencing (NGS) to determine the best therapy for each patient. Results: The MDCI protocol combines analysis of patient medical history, blood, and tumor assays, including HLA expression, protein analyses and NGS. A trial-matching approach, developed in collaboration with IQVIA, identifies potential clinical trials based on screening results. The Gather Share Know Hub, an optional patient-facing portal, allows patients to view the screening results identified as important for patients and information about ongoing clinical trial options. Patients also have access to a patient-friendly informational video, disease-specific education, credible resources and information on “what to expect” at study visits. Physicians receive clinical reports and molecular profiles from multiple screening tests (available through the Physician Portal), enabling them to make informed, data-driven decisions on the best clinical trial option for each patient. Conclusions: Utilizing a collaborative approach, MDCI was developed as a novel tumor-profiling protocol. MDCI is designed to rapidly prescreen patients for multiple studies at once by evaluating each patient’s tumor and blood genetics as well as their medical and cancer history using a prescreening algorithm. MDCI introduces an individualized approach to patient care with the aim of accelerating the availability of new therapeutic options. Continued feedback is solicited from patients on study design and the Gather Share Know hub through timed questionnaires to further enhance the patient experience. This study (NCT04772053) is funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Clinical trial information: NCT04772053.

Tim-3 mediates T cell trogocytosis to limit antitumor immunity

T cell immunoglobulin mucin domain-containing protein 3 (Tim-3) negatively regulates innate and adaptive immunity in cancer. To identify the mechanisms of Tim-3 in cancer immunity, we evaluated the effects of Tim-3 blockade in human and mouse melanoma. Here, we show that human programmed cell death 1-positive (PD-1+) Tim-3+CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) upregulate phosphatidylserine (PS), a receptor for Tim-3, and acquire cell surface myeloid markers from antigen-presenting cells (APCs) through transfer of membrane fragments called trogocytosis. Tim-3 blockade acted on Tim-3+ APCs in a PS-dependent fashion to disrupt the trogocytosis of activated tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and PD-1+Tim-3+ CD8+ TILs isolated from patients with melanoma. Tim-3 and PD-1 blockades cooperated to disrupt trogocytosis of CD8+ TILs in 2 melanoma mouse models, decreasing tumor burden and prolonging survival. Deleting Tim-3 in dendritic cells but not in CD8+ T cells impeded the trogocytosis of CD8+ TILs in vivo. Trogocytosed CD8+ T cells presented tumor peptide-major histocompatibility complexes and became the target of fratricide T cell killing, which was reversed by Tim-3 blockade. Our findings have uncovered a mechanism Tim-3 uses to limit antitumor immunity.

scMAPA: Identification of cell-type-specific alternative polyadenylation in complex tissues

Background

Alternative polyadenylation (APA) causes shortening or lengthening of the 3ʹ-untranslated region (3ʹ-UTR) of genes (APA genes) in diverse cellular processes such as cell proliferation and differentiation. To identify cell-type–specific APA genes in scRNA-Seq data, current bioinformatic methods have several limitations. First, they assume certain read coverage shapes in the scRNA-Seq data, which can be violated in multiple APA genes. Second, their identification is limited between 2 cell types and not directly applicable to the data of multiple cell types. Third, they do not control undesired source of variance, which potentially introduces noise to the cell-type–specific identification of APA genes.

Findings

We developed a combination of a computational change-point algorithm and a statistical model, single-cell Multi-group identification of APA (scMAPA). To avoid the assumptions on the read coverage shape, scMAPA formulates a change-point problem after transforming the 3ʹ biased scRNA-Seq data to represent the full-length 3ʹ-UTR signal. To identify cell-type–specific APA genes while adjusting for undesired source of variation, scMAPA models APA isoforms in consideration of the cell types and the undesired source. In our novel simulation data and data from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, scMAPA outperforms existing methods in sensitivity, robustness, and stability. In mouse brain data consisting of multiple cell types sampled from multiple regions, scMAPA identifies cell-type–specific APA genes, elucidating novel roles of APA for dividing immune cells and differentiated neuron cells and in multiple brain disorders.

Conclusions

scMAPA elucidates the cell-type–specific function of APA events and sheds novel insights into the functional roles of APA events in complex tissues.

Intestinal microbiota signatures of clinical response and immune-related adverse events in melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1

Ample evidence indicates that the gut microbiome is a tumor-extrinsic factor associated with antitumor response to anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy, but inconsistencies exist between published microbial signatures associated with clinical outcomes. To resolve this, we evaluated a new melanoma cohort, along with four published datasets. Time-to-event analysis showed that baseline microbiota composition was optimally associated with clinical outcome at approximately 1 year after initiation of treatment. Meta-analysis and other bioinformatic analyses of the combined data show that bacteria associated with favorable response are confined within the Actinobacteria phylum and the Lachnospiraceae/Ruminococcaceae families of Firmicutes. Conversely, Gram-negative bacteria were associated with an inflammatory host intestinal gene signature, increased blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and unfavorable outcome. Two microbial signatures, enriched for Lachnospiraceae spp. and Streptococcaceae spp., were associated with favorable and unfavorable clinical response, respectively, and with distinct immune-related adverse effects. Despite between-cohort heterogeneity, optimized all-minus-one supervised learning algorithms trained on batch-corrected microbiome data consistently predicted outcomes to programmed cell death protein-1 therapy in all cohorts. Gut microbial communities (microbiotypes) with nonuniform geographical distribution were associated with favorable and unfavorable outcomes, contributing to discrepancies between cohorts. Our findings shed new light on the complex interaction between the gut microbiome and response to cancer immunotherapy, providing a roadmap for future studies.

Pembrolizumab plus azacitidine in patients with chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a single-arm phase 2 trial and correlative biomarker analysis

Background

DNA mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is not responsive to pembrolizumab monotherapy. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors can promote antitumor immune responses. This clinical trial investigated whether concurrent treatment with azacitidine enhances the antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in mCRC.

Methods

We conducted a phase 2 single-arm trial evaluating activity and tolerability of pembrolizumab plus azacitidine in patients with chemotherapy-refractory mCRC (NCT02260440). Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 and azacitidine 100 mg SQ on days 1–5, every 3 weeks. A low fixed dose of azacitidine was chosen in order to reduce the possibility of a direct cytotoxic effect of the drug, since the main focus of this study was to investigate its potential immunomodulatory effect. The primary endpoint of this study was overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST v1.1., and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumor tissue was collected pre- and on-treatment for correlative studies.

Results

Thirty chemotherapy-refractory patients received a median of three cycles of therapy. One patient achieved partial response (PR), and one patient had stable disease (SD) as best confirmed response. The ORR was 3%, median PFS was 1.9 months, and median OS was 6.3 months. The combination regimen was well-tolerated, and 96% of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1/2. This trial was terminated prior to the accrual target of 40 patients due to lack of clinical efficacy. DNA methylation on-treatment as compared to pre-treatment decreased genome wide in 10 of 15 patients with paired biopsies and was significantly lower in gene promoter regions after treatment. These promoter demethylated genes represented a higher proportion of upregulated genes, including several immune gene sets, endogenous retroviral elements, and cancer-testis antigens. CD8⁺ TIL density trended higher on-treatment compared to pre-treatment. Higher CD8⁺ TIL density at baseline was associated with greater likelihood of benefit from treatment. On-treatment tumor demethylation correlated with the increases in tumor CD8⁺ TIL density.

Conclusions

The combination of pembrolizumab and azacitidine is safe and tolerable with modest clinical activity in the treatment for chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. Correlative studies suggest that tumor DNA demethylation and immunomodulation occurs. An association between tumor DNA demethylation and tumor-immune modulation suggests immune modulation and may result from treatment with azacitidine.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02260440. Registered 9 October 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02260440.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13148-021-01226-y.

Immune-Related Adverse Events in PD-1 Treated Melanoma and Impact Upon Anti-Tumor Efficacy: A Real World Analysis

Background

Anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of melanoma by producing durable long-term responses in a subset of patients. ICI-treated patients develop unique toxicities - immune related adverse events (irAEs) – that arise from unrestrained immune activation. The link between irAE development and clinical outcome in melanoma and other cancers is inconsistent; and little data exists on the occurrence of multiple irAEs. We sought to characterize development of single and multiple irAEs, and association of irAE(s) development with clinical variables and impact upon outcomes in advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 ICIs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 190 patients with metastatic melanoma treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 ICI therapy between June 2014 and August 2020 at a large integrated network cancer center identified through retrospective review of pharmacy records. irAEs were graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Results

190 patients were evaluated of whom 114 patients (60.0%) experienced ≥1 irAE, including 30 (15.8%) with grade 3/4 irAEs. The occurrence of any irAE was strongly associated with the development of investigator-assessed response to anti-PD-1 therapy (p < 0.0001); whether evaluated by current (p=0.0082) or best (p=0.0001) response. In patients with ≥2 irAEs, distinct patterns were observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were greater in those with any irAE compared to those without (PFS, 28 months vs. 5 months, p < 0.0001; OS, not reached vs. 9 months, p < 0.0001). Development of ≥2 irAEs had a trend towards improved PFS and OS compared to those who developed a single irAE, although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.2555, PFS; p=0.0583, OS). Obesity but not age or gender was distinctly associated with irAE development.

Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that irAE occurrence was significantly associated with response to anti-PD-1 therapy and improved PFS/OS. Those who developed multiple irAEs had a trend towards improved PFS and OS compared to those who developed only a single irAE. Increased BMI but neither age nor gender were associated with irAE development. Distinct patterns of irAEs observed suggest shared etiopathogenetic mechanisms.

Abstract LB062: Efficacy of Responder-derived Fecal Microbiota Transplant (R-FMT) and Pembrolizumab in Anti-PD-1 Refractory Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor provide durable long-term benefit in a subset of patients (pts) with advanced melanoma with response rates of 35-42% and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 27%. Separately, the composition of the gut microbiota has been shown to correlate with anti-PD-1 efficacy in human cancer pts with melanoma, renal cell cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the precise organisms differ considerably across various studies. In preclinical models, responder-derived fecal microbiome and microbiome consortia produce anti-tumor responses. The effect of microbiome modulation in pts with anti-PD-1 refractory melanoma has not been evaluated. Methods: To evaluate whether primary resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy could be overcome by intestinal microbiome modulation, we designed and conducted a phase II study (NCT03341143). We enrolled pts with primary refractory metastatic melanoma with best response of short-term stable disease (≤6 months) or progressive disease (PD) to prior anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy. Pts received single-administration of responder-derived fecal microbiota transplantation (R-FMT) together with pembrolizumab. Candidate donors were pts with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy with durable partial or complete response (PR, CR). Pembrolizumab was continued till intolerable toxicity or disease progression. Safety and clinical activity (based on RECIST v1.1) were main objectives; while progression-free survival (PFS) was a key secondary endpoint. Results: As of December 1, 2020, 16 pts with primary refractory melanoma were enrolled, of whom 15 were evaluable. LDH was elevated in 14/15 pts; and the median number of prior therapies was 2. Recipient pts were seromatched to receive a single R-FMT from one of eight candidate donors (5 CR; 3 PR; median PFS 58 months, range 43-70). R-FMT was administered via colonoscopy after bowel preparation with no use of antibiotics. Pembrolizumab was administered IV per label. R-FMT/pembrolizumab was well-tolerated, with no unusual toxicity signals. R-FMT induced rapid and durable microbiota perturbation in most pts; while 6 of 15 evaluable pts had evidence of clinical benefit. Response to R-FMT/pembrolizumab was associated with an increased abundance of taxa previously shown to be associated with response to anti-PD-1, increased CD8+ T cell activation, and decreased frequency of IL-8 expressing myeloid cells. Responders had distinct proteomic and metabolomic signatures, and transkingdom network analyses confirmed that the gut microbiome regulated these changes. Conclusions: In pts with anti-PD-1 primary refractory melanoma, R-FMT/pembrolizumab changed the gut microbiome and reprogrammed the tumor microenvironment to overcome resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Response was associated with CD8 T cell induction and reduction of IL-8 expressing myeloid cells.

Citation Format: Diwakar Davar, Amiran Dzutsev, John A. McCulloch, Richard R. Rodrigues, Joe-Marc Chauvin, Robert M. Morrison, Richelle N. Deblasio, Carmine Menna, Quanquan Ding, Ornella Pagliano, Bochra Zidi, Shuowen Zhang, Jonathan H. Badger, Marie Vetizou, Alicia M. Cole, Miriam R. Fernandes, Stephanie Prescott, Raquel G. Costa, Ascharya K. Balaji, Andrey Morgun, Ivan Vujkovic-Cvijin, Hong Wang, Amir A. Borhani, Marc B. Schwartz, Howard M. Dubner, Scarlett J. Ernst, Amy Rose, Yana G. Najjar, Yasmine Belkaid, John M. Kirkwood, Giorgio Trinchieri, Hassane M. Zarour. Efficacy of Responder-derived Fecal Microbiota Transplant (R-FMT) and Pembrolizumab in Anti-PD-1 Refractory Patients with Advanced Melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB062.

A phase I trial of pembrolizumab plus vemurafenib and cobimetinib in patients with advanced melanoma

e21506

Background: Management of patients (pts) with advanced melanoma includes anti-PD1 with or without anti-CTLA4, and for pts with a BRAF mutation, the additional option of targeted therapy. Preclinical and translational evidence suggest BRAF/MEK inhibitors (i) modulate the tumor microenvironment, providing rationale for combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Phase 3 IMspire data reported improved progression-free survival (PFS) with triplet therapy (atezolizumab/vemurafenib/cobimetinib), yielding regulatory approval. However, 79% of pts experienced grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in the triplet arm. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, phase I trial of pembrolizumab (pembro) plus vemurafenib (vem) and cobimetinib (cobi) for pts with advanced melanoma in the first line setting. The first 4 pts received vem/pembro. The protocol was subsequently amended, and the next 5 pts received vem/cobi/pembro. Vem/cobi had an escalating dosing regimen. Pembro was 200 mg q3 weeks. Primary endpoints: safety and maximum tolerated dose of vem/cobi when administered with pembro. Secondary endpoints: overall response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL). We planned to accrue 30 pts; however, the trial was closed after enrollment of 9 pts due to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). This study NCT02818023 was approved by the IRB, and all pts provided informed consent. Results: Pts received a median of 6 cycles of triplet therapy. 8 of 9 pts experienced drug-related grade 3/4 AEs, most commonly dermatitis (89%). In the vem/pembro group, DLTs included hepatitis (n = 1), dermatitis (n = 3), and arthralgias (n = 1). In the vem/cobi/pembro group, DLTs included dermatitis (n = 5), QTc prolongation (n = 1), and arthralgias (n = 1). QoL assessments identified a clinically significant decrease in average health utility at 1 year compared to baseline (0.38 v 0.43). Median PFS was 20.7 months and median OS was 23.8 months for vem/pembro, and neither was reached for vem/cobi/pembro. Overall, 4 pts had ongoing responses at the time of data analysis. 2 pts experienced a complete response, 5 had a partial response, 1 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease at first restaging. Peripheral blood flow cytometry identified significantly decreased PD1 expression on CD4+ T-cells at 3 and 9 weeks compared to baseline. This did not correspond to clinical response. PD-L1 testing was also performed on 6 paired tumor samples, and no significant association was identified between PD-L1 expression and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Despite preclinical and translational evidence for tumor immunomodulation with BRAF/MEKi and improved PFS noted in IMspire150, toxicity incurred with the triplet is challenging from a practical standpoint. Our study highlights clinical efficacy of the combination and adds additional toxicity data for triplet therapy, with 8 of 9 pts experiencing at least a grade 3 AE. Clinical trial information: NCT02818023.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on staging at presentation of patients with invasive melanoma

e21579

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted cancer care beyond the direct implications of viral infection. Delays in presentation and diagnosis may lead to more advanced disease and worse patient outcomes. We evaluated the impact of the pandemic on patients (pts) with melanoma (mel). Methods: A single-institution, retrospective comparison of pts with newly diagnosed invasive mel or metastatic recurrence prior to (pre-cohort, n = 246) and after (post-cohort, n = 246) declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic on March 11, 2020. 492 pts were evaluated between March 1, 2019 and January 12, 2021. Key variables collected included demographics, pathology, stage at diagnosis, surgical management, receipt of adjuvant or systemic therapy, and follow up. Categorical variables were compared using the two-sided Fisher’s exact test, continuous variables were compared using the two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test, and survival endpoints were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. This study was exempt from review by the IRB. Results: 200 (81.3%) pts presented with early-stage disease and 46 (18.7%) pts presented with metastatic disease in the post-cohort, compared to 209 (85%) and 37 (15%) pts in the pre-cohort, respectively. In the post-cohort there was a significant decrease in stage I pts (28.5% vs 40.7%, p = 0.006), a significant increase in stage III pts (30.5% vs 21.1%, p = 0.023), and a significant increase in pts with metastatic recurrence (7.7% vs 3.3%, p = 0.046) compared to the pre-cohort. There was also a significant increase in pts with brain metastases (BM) in the post-cohort (6.5% vs 1.6%, p = 0.010). For pts with early-stage disease, there was a significant increase in median Breslow depth (2.0 vs 1.4 mm, p = 0.047) and mitotic rate > 1 (78.1% vs 66%, p = 0.008) in the post-cohort. There were trends toward increased ulceration, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, and microsatellite presence. Pts receiving adjuvant therapy in the post-cohort were significantly more likely to receive oral targeted therapy (37.6% vs 27.5%) compared to IV immunotherapy (62.4% vs 72.5%), p = 0.034, perhaps reflecting an attempt to minimize in-person visits. There was not a significant difference between the 2 groups in the type of systemic therapy administered in the metastatic setting. Median progression-free and overall survival were not reached due to a limited number of events in each arm. Conclusions: There was a significant decrease in pts with stage I mel along with a significant increase in pts with stage III mel, metastatic recurrence, and BMs presenting to our institution during the pandemic. Findings are likely related to delays from both the patient (to avoid interaction with the healthcare system - including primary care, dermatology, and oncology) and from the system itself, with some clinics potentially evaluating pts in a limited capacity. These data reaffirm the importance of early detection and evaluation of melanoma.

A phase 1 study of NY-ESO-1 vaccine + anti-CTLA4 antibody Ipilimumab (IPI) in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma

Ipilimumab (IPI) can enhance immunity to the cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1. A clinical trial was designed to assess safety, immunogenicity, and clinical responses with IPI + NY-ESO-1 vaccines and effects on the tumor microenvironment (TME). Patients with measurable NY-ESO-1⁺ tumors were enrolled among three arms: A) IPI + NY-ESO-1 protein + poly-ICLC (pICLC) + incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA); B) IPI + NY-ESO-1 overlapping long peptides (OLP) + pICLC + IFA; and C) IPI + NY-ESO-1 OLP + pICLC. Clinical responses were assessed by irRC. T cell and Ab responses were assessed by ex vivo IFN-gamma ELIspot and ELISA. Tumor biopsies pre- and post-treatment were evaluated for immune infiltrates. Eight patients were enrolled: 5, 2, and 1 in Arms A-C, respectively. There were no DLTs. Best clinical responses were SD (4) and PD (4). T-cell and antibody (Ab) responses to NY-ESO-1 were detected in 6 (75%) and 7 (88%) patients, respectively, and were associated with SD. The breadth of Ab responses was greater for patients with SD than PD (p = .036). For five patients evaluable in the TME, treatment was associated with increases in proliferating (Ki67⁺) CD8⁺ T cells and decreases in RORγt⁺ CD4⁺ T cells. T cell densities increased for those with SD. Detection of T cell responses to NY-ESO-1 ex vivo in most patients suggests that IPI may have enhanced those responses. Proliferating intratumoral CD8⁺ T cells increased after vaccination plus IPI suggesting favorable impact of IPI plus NY-ESO-1 vaccines on the TME.

List of Abbreviations: Ab = antibody; CTCAE = NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; DHFR/DHRP = dihydrofolate reductase; DLT = Dose-limiting toxicity; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IFA = incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51); IFNγ = Interferon gamma; IPI = Ipilimumab; irRC = immune-related response criteria; mIFH = multispectral immunofluorescence histology; OLP = NY-ESO-1 overlapping long peptides; PBMC = peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PD = Progressive disease; pICLC = poly-ICLC (Hiltonol), a TLR3/MDA-5 agonist; RLT = Regimen-limiting Toxicity; ROI = regions of interest; RT = room temperature; SAE = serious adverse event; SD = stable disease; TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse events; TLR = toll-like receptor; TME = tumor microenvironment; TRAE = treatment-related adverse events.

Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and High-Dose IFNα-2b in Resectable Regionally Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy may improve the clinical outcome of regionally advanced operable melanoma and allows for rapid clinical and pathologic assessment of response. We examined neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and high-dose IFNα-2b (HDI) therapy in patients with resectable advanced melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma were treated with concurrent pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks and HDI 20 MU/m²/day i.v., 5 days per week for 4 weeks, then 10 MU/m²/day subcutaneously 3 days per week for 2 weeks. Definitive surgery followed, as did adjuvant combination immunotherapy, completing a year of treatment. Primary endpoint was safety of the combination. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), pathologic complete response (pCR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Blood samples for correlative studies were collected throughout. Tumor tissue was assessed by IHC and flow cytometry at baseline and at surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were enrolled, and 30 were evaluable. At data cutoff (October 2, 2019), median follow-up for OS was 37.87 months (range, 33.2-43.47). Median OS and RFS were not reached. Radiographic ORR was 73.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 55.5-85.8], with a 43% (95% CI: 27.3-60.1) pCR rate. None of the patients with a pCR have had a recurrence. HDI and pembrolizumab were discontinued in 73% and 43% of patients, respectively. Correlative analyses suggested that intratumoral PD-1/PD-L1 interaction and HLA-DR expression are associated with pCR (P = 0.002 and P = 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant concurrent HDI and pembrolizumab demonstrated promising clinical activity despite high rates of treatment discontinuation. pCR is a prognostic indicator.See related commentary by Menzies et al., p. 4133.

Fecal microbiota transplant overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy provides long-term clinical benefits to patients with advanced melanoma. The composition of the gut microbiota correlates with anti-PD-1 efficacy in preclinical models and cancer patients. To investigate whether resistance to anti-PD-1 can be overcome by changing the gut microbiota, this clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of responder-derived fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) together with anti-PD-1 in patients with PD-1-refractory melanoma. This combination was well tolerated, provided clinical benefit in 6 of 15 patients, and induced rapid and durable microbiota perturbation. Responders exhibited increased abundance of taxa that were previously shown to be associated with response to anti-PD-1, increased CD8⁺ T cell activation, and decreased frequency of interleukin-8-expressing myeloid cells. Responders had distinct proteomic and metabolomic signatures, and transkingdom network analyses confirmed that the gut microbiome regulated these changes. Collectively, our findings show that FMT and anti-PD-1 changed the gut microbiome and reprogrammed the tumor microenvironment to overcome resistance to anti-PD-1 in a subset of PD-1 advanced melanoma.

Targeting novel inhibitory receptors in cancer immunotherapy

T cells play a critical role in promoting tumor regression in both experimental models and humans. Yet, T cells that are chronically exposed to tumor antigen during cancer progression can become dysfunctional/exhausted and fail to induce tumor destruction. Such tumor-induced T cell dysfunction may occur via multiple mechanisms. In particular, immune checkpoint inhibitory receptors that are upregulated by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in many cancers limit T cell survival and function. Overcoming this inhibitory receptor-mediated T cell dysfunction has been a central focus of recent developments in cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapies targeting inhibitory receptor pathways such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), alone or in combination, confer significant clinical benefits in multiple tumor types. However, many patients with cancer do not respond to immune checkpoint blockade, and dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade may cause serious adverse events, which limits its indications. Targeting novel non-redundant inhibitory receptor pathways contributing to tumor-induced T cell dysfunction in the tumor microenvironment may prove efficacious and non-toxic. This review presents preclinical and clinical findings supporting the roles of two key pathways-T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3) and T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domain (TIGIT)/CD226/CD96/CD112R-in cancer immunotherapy.

Perspectives in melanoma: meeting report from the "Melanoma Bridge" (December 5th-7th, 2019, Naples, Italy)

The melanoma treatment landscape changed in 2011 with the approval of the first anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)-4 checkpoint inhibitor and of the first BRAF-targeted monoclonal antibody, both of which significantly improved overall survival (OS). Since then, improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor immune-evasion mechanisms has resulted in new approaches to targeting and harnessing the host immune response. The approval of new immune and targeted therapies has further improved outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma and other combination modalities are also being explored such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, electrochemotherapy and surgery. In addition, different strategies of drugs administration including sequential or combination treatment are being tested. Approaches to overcome resistance and to potentiate the immune response are being developed. Increasing evidence emerges that tissue and blood-based biomarkers can predict the response to a therapy. The latest findings in melanoma research, including insights into the tumor microenvironment and new biomarkers, improved understanding of tumor immune response and resistance, novel approaches for combination strategies and the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, were the focus of discussions at the Melanoma Bridge meeting (5-7 December, 2019, Naples, Italy), which are summarized in this report.

TIGIT in cancer immunotherapy

Tumors evade immune-mediated recognition through multiple mechanisms of immune escape. On chronic tumor antigen exposure, T cells become dysfunctional/exhausted and upregulate various checkpoint inhibitory receptors (IRs) that limit T cells’ survival and function. During the last decade, immunotherapies targeting IRs such as programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and anticytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have provided ample evidence of clinical benefits in many solid tumors. Beyond CTLA-4 and PD-1, multiple other IRs are also targeted with immune checkpoint blockade in the clinic. Specifically, T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is a promising new target for cancer immunotherapy. TIGIT is upregulated by immune cells, including activated T cells, natural killer cells, and regulatory T cells. TIGIT binds to two ligands, CD155 (PVR) and CD112 (PVRL2, nectin-2), that are expressed by tumor cells and antigen-presenting cells in the tumor microenvironment. There is now ample evidence that the TIGIT pathway regulates T cell-mediated and natural killer cell-mediated tumor recognition in vivo and in vitro. Dual PD-1/TIGIT blockade potently increases tumor antigen-specific CD8⁺ T cell expansion and function in vitro and promotes tumor rejection in mouse tumor models. These findings support development of ongoing clinical trials with dual PD-1/TIGIT blockade in patients with cancer.

IL15 Stimulation with TIGIT Blockade Reverses CD155-mediated NK-Cell Dysfunction in Melanoma

PURPOSE

Natural killer (NK) cells play a critical role in tumor immunosurveillance. Multiple activating and inhibitory receptors (IR) regulate NK-cell-mediated tumor control. The IR T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) and its counter-receptor CD226 exert opposite effects on NK-cell-mediated tumor reactivity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We evaluated the frequency, phenotype, and functions of NK cells freshly isolated from healthy donors and patients with melanoma with multiparameter flow cytometry. We assessed TIGIT and CD226 cell surface expression and internalization upon binding to CD155. We evaluated the role of IL15 and TIGIT blockade in increasing NK-cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro and in two mouse models.

RESULTS

NK cells are present at low frequencies in metastatic melanoma, are dysfunctional, and downregulate both TIGIT and CD226 expression. As compared with TIGIT^- NK cells, TIGIT⁺ NK cells exhibit higher cytotoxic capacity and maturation, but paradoxically lower cytotoxicity against CD155⁺ MHC class I-deficient melanoma cells. Membrane bound CD155 triggers CD226 internalization and degradation, resulting in decreased NK-cell-mediated tumor reactivity. IL15 increases TIGIT and CD226 gene expression by tumor-infiltrating NK cells (TiNKs) and, together with TIGIT blockade, increases NK-cell-mediated melanoma cytotoxicity in vitro and decreases tumor metastasis in two mouse melanoma models. Specific deletion of TIGIT on transferred NK cells enhances the antimetastatic activity of IL15, while CD226 blockade decreases the effects of IL15 and TIGIT blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the development of novel combinatorial immunotherapy with IL15 and TIGIT blockade to promote NK-cell-mediated destruction of MHC class I-deficient melanoma, which are refractory to CD8⁺ T-cell-mediated immunity.See related commentary by Pietra et al., p. 5274.

The Great Debate at "Melanoma Bridge", Naples, December 7th, 2019

The Great Debate session at the 2019 Melanoma Bridge congress (December 5-7, Naples, Italy) featured counterpoint views from experts on five topical issues in melanoma. These were whether to choose local intratumoral treatment or systemic treatment, whether patients with stage IIIA melanoma require adjuvant therapy or not, whether treatment is better changed at disease progression or during stable disease, whether adoptive cell transfer (ACT) therapy is more appropriate used before or in combination with checkpoint inhibition therapy, and whether treatment can be stopped while the patient is still on response. As was the case for previous meetings, the debates were assigned by meeting Chairs. As such, positions taken by each of the melanoma experts during the debates may not have reflected their respective personal approach.

Biomarker analysis for UPCI 14-118: Phase II study of pembrolizumab in combination with azacitidine in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

173

Background: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proficient colorectal cancer (CRC) is resistant to immune checkpoint therapy compared to MMR deficient CRC. DNA hypomethylating agents may promote anti-tumor immune response by re-expression of cancer-testis antigen and reactivating immune genes suppressed by DNA methylation. This trial tested whether epigenetic modulation by concurrent treatment with azacitidine could enhance the anti-tumor activity of pembrolizumab in mCRC. Methods: Phase II trial was conducted to evaluate activity, safety, and tolerability of pembrolizumab in combination with azacitidine in patients with previously treated pMMR metastatic CRC. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 and azacitidine 100 mg daily SQ injection on days 1-5 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was ORR. Tumors were biopsied pre-treatment and on-treatment for biomarker studies. Results: 30 patients received at least one dose of therapy. One patient experienced a confirmed partial response, one experienced stable disease. ORR was 3% (1/30; 95% CI, 0.1-17%). Median PFS was 1.9 months, median OS was 6.3 months. Treatment was well tolerated with only one patient (3%) experiencing grade 3 adverse event. The patient with a PR had positive pre-treatment TILs, but no evaluable tumor from on-treatment biopsy. 2 of 6 patients who continued therapy despite PD on first restaging experienced temporary stabilization of disease later. 5 of 16 evaluable biopsy pairs demonstrated increased TILs on treatment compared to baseline; however, all of these patients experienced PD. 10 of 15 paired samples demonstrated decreased methylation of hypermethylated loci on-treatment. Clustering analysis demonstrated a correlation between pre-treatment methylation of immune activation genes with overall survival of the patients. Conclusions: Combining azacitidine and pembrolizumab is safe and tolerable for pMMR mCRC with only limited activity. DNA methylation and TIL changes are detectable after 3 cycles of therapy. DNA methylation of immune activation genes correlate with overall survival. RNA sequencing and peripheral immune cell flow cytometry are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02260440.

IRF1 Inhibits Antitumor Immunity through the Upregulation of PD-L1 in the Tumor Cell

Multiple studies have associated the transcription factor IRF1 with tumor-suppressive activities. Here, we report an opposite tumor cell-intrinsic function of IRF1 in promoting tumor growth. IRF1-deficient tumor cells showed reduced tumor growth in MC38 and CT26 colon carcinoma and B16 melanoma mouse models. This reduction in tumor growth was dependent on host CD8⁺ T cells. Detailed profiling of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes did not show changes in the various T-cell and myeloid cell populations. However, CD8⁺ T cells that had infiltrated IRF1-deficieint tumors in vivo exhibited enhanced cytotoxicity. IRF1-deficient tumor cells lost the ability to upregulate PD-L1 expression in vitro and in vivo and were more susceptible to T-cell-mediated killing. Induced expression of PD-L1 in IRF1-deficient tumor cells restored tumor growth. These results indicate differential activity of IRF1 in tumor escape.

Association of baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with response and survival in advanced melanoma (MEL) receiving PD-1 inhibitors

9571

Background: Inflammation is an adverse prognostic factor in cancer. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an easily derived biomarker of systemic inflammation. Several studies have demonstrated that elevated NLR is linked with adverse prognosis in patients (pts) receiving immunotherapy including PD-1 inhibitors. To evaluate the prognostic utility of NLR, we performed a retrospective evaluation of NLR and other covariates in stage IV cutaneous MEL. Methods: Stage IV cutaneous MEL pts who received anti PD-1 therapy at the University of Pittsburgh between 2014-2018 were included in this analysis. PD-1 blockade was continued until progression or intolerable toxicity. Tumor assessment was performed at baseline and every 12 weeks and response classified per RECIST v1.1. Clinical and demographic data were obtained. Baseline NLR was defined based on values at the first treatment date. Descriptive statistics were created for all covariates. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed to assess how variables related to response (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) measured in months (mos). Results: 172 pts with advanced MEL were evaluated. Elevated NLR was associated with poorer PFS and OS and ORR at all cutoffs (NLR≥2 to NLR≥5) with NLR≥5 having the greatest discriminative value. ORR steadily declined with increasing NLR: NLR≥1 (ORR 64%), NLR≥2 (ORR 61%), NLR≥3 (ORR 52%), NLR≥4 (ORR 43%), NLR≥5 (ORR 43%). Elevated NLR ( < 5 vs. ≥5) was associated with poorer PFS (median 21.5 mths vs. 5.2 mos; p = 0.00041) and OS (median 35.4 os vs. 10.6 mos; p < 0.0001). In a multivariate model, elevated NLR ( < 5 vs. ≥5) was independently associated with poorer OS/PFS separate from ulceration, performance status and elevated LDH. There was no evidence of an age-related increase or decrease in NLR. Conclusions: Baseline NLR was independently associated with response, PFS and OS in the largest retrospective series of advanced MEL pts treated with PD-1 blockade. NLR independent of other factors predicted poorer PFS and OS at NLR cutoffs (NLR≥3 to NLR≥5), although NLR≥5 segregated pts best. NLR is an inexpensive and easily obtained real-world biomarker that has a high value in predicting outcomes to PD-1 blockade.

Association of baseline body mass index (BMI) with response and survival in patients (Pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) receiving PD-1 inhibitors

9579

Background: Obesity promotes PD-1–mediated T cell dysfunction but also improves tumor response to PD-1 blockade. Obesity has been linked with positive outcomes in pts treated with PD-1 blockade. To evaluate the prognostic utility of BMI, we performed a retrospective evaluation of BMI and other covariates in 172 pts with stage IV cutaneous MEL. Methods: Pts with stage IV cutaneous MEL who received anti PD-1 therapy at the University of Pittsburgh between 2014-2018 were included in this analysis. PD-1 blockade was continued until progression or intolerable toxicity. Tumor assessment was performed at baseline and every 12 weeks and response classified per RECIST v1.1. Clinical and demographic data were obtained. BMI was defined based on values at the first treatment date and dichotomized into two groups: ≥30 vs. < 30. Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the correlation between BMI group and ORR. Kaplan Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were performed to analyzed the time-to-event outcomes (OS and PFS). Results: 172 pts with advanced MEL were evaluated. Greater BMI was associated with greater ORR, PFS and OS across various BMI cutoffs (BMI≥28, BMI≥30 and BMI≥35) although this effect was most obvious at BMI≥30. Pts with BMI≥30 achieved higher ORR than those with BMI < 30 (74% vs. 58%, p-value = 0.04). Concordantly, pts with BMI≥30 had improved PFS and OS: median PFS (BMI≥30 21.1 mos vs. BMI < 30 10.7 mos) and median OS (BMI≥30 35.4 mos vs. BMI < 30 22.8 mos). Higher BMI was independently associated with improved OS (p = 0.018) and PFS (p = 0.047) adjusting for age, Breslow thickness and sex. No significant interaction was observed between the effects of BMI and that of age, sex, or Breslow thickness. Conclusions: Increased BMI was associated with greater ORR in addition to previously reported associations with PFS/OS in a large retrospective series of advanced MEL pts treated with PD-1 blockade. This data was independent of other prognostic factors and underscore the “inflammaging” effects of obesity and age in relation to anti PD-1 therapy in advanced cancer.

Association of medication (Med) and antibiotic (Abx) use with response and survival in advanced melanoma (MEL) receiving PD-1 inhibitors

9572

Background: Retrospective studies suggest that various med could dichotomous effects in regards to immunotherapy. These include adverse (antibiotics) and positive (aspirin, beta-blockers) influences. To evaluate potential additive or detrimental effects of various med in patients (pts) receiving PD-1 immunotherapy, we performed a retrospective evaluation of med intake in 172 pts with stage IV cutaneous MEL focusing on aspirin (asp), antacid (ant), antibiotic (abx), bisphosphonate (bisp), metformin (met) and statin (stat) intake. Methods: Pts with stage IV cutaneous MEL who received anti PD-1 therapy at the University of Pittsburgh between 2014-2018 were included in this analysis. PD-1 blockade was continued until progression or intolerable toxicity. Tumor assessment was performed at baseline and every 12 weeks and response classified per RECIST v1.1. Clinical and demographic data were obtained. Med intake was documented based on chart review in all pts. Intake was confirmed by analyzing at least one other note from a non-oncological provider. Descriptive statistics were created for all covariates. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed to assess how categorical variables related to response (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) measured in months (mths). Results: 172 pts with advanced MEL were evaluated. Asp, ant, abx, bisp, met and stat use was documented in 62, 82, 29, 4, 15 and 57 pts respectively. ORR was not significantly related to intake of asp, ant, bisp, met and stat use; although ORR was lower in pts who received abx (p=0.0328). There was no significant difference in PFS and OS in pts who received asp, ant, bisp, met and stat. In patients who received abx compared to those who did not, median PFS (16.6 mths vs. 19.8 mths) and median OS (23.8 mths vs. 35.4) were both lower. Abx use did not interact with other meds. Conclusions: In this retrospective series of advanced MEL pts treated with PD-1 blockade, abx use was adversely associated with response to PD-1 blockade. Abx use was also associated with poorer PFS and OS. Conversely, neither a positive nor negative association with ORR, PFS and/or OS was seen with asp, ant, bisp, met and stat use. These results validate prior studies suggesting that abx use is associated with worse outcomes in pts receiving PD-1 blockade possibly by mediating intestinal dysbiosis.

Five-year survival outcomes for patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab in KEYNOTE-001

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab demonstrated robust antitumor activity and safety in the phase Ib KEYNOTE-001 study (NCT01295827) of advanced melanoma. Five-year outcomes in all patients and treatment-naive patients are reported herein. Patients whose disease progressed following initial response and who received a second course of pembrolizumab were also analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with previously treated or treatment-naive advanced/metastatic melanoma received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient/investigator decision to withdraw. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. Objective response rate and PFS were based on immune-related response criteria by investigator assessment (data cut-off, September 1, 2017).

RESULTS

KEYNOTE-001 enrolled 655 patients with melanoma; median follow-up was 55 months. Estimated 5-year OS was 34% in all patients and 41% in treatment-naive patients; median OS was 23.8 months (95% CI, 20.2-30.4) and 38.6 months (95% CI, 27.2-not reached), respectively. Estimated 5-year PFS rates were 21% in all patients and 29% in treatment-naive patients; median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.8-11.1) and 16.9 months (95% CI, 9.3-35.5), respectively. Median response duration was not reached; 73% of all responses and 82% of treatment-naive responses were ongoing at data cut-off; the longest response was ongoing at 66 months. Four patients [all with prior response of complete response (CR)] whose disease progressed during observation subsequently received second-course pembrolizumab. One patient each achieved CR and partial response (after data cut-off). Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 86% of patients and resulted in study discontinuation in 7.8%; 17% experienced grade 3/4 TRAE.

CONCLUSIONS

This 5-year analysis of KEYNOTE-001 represents the longest follow-up for pembrolizumab to date and confirms the durable antitumor activity and tolerability of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827.

Abstract IA38: Manipulating the gut microbiome to improve immunotherapy of melanoma

Immunotherapy with blocking anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies (a PD1 mAbs) has become one of the most potent therapies of melanoma, providing extended clinical benefits to 30-40% advanced melanoma patients. There is substantial evidence that pre-existing tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cell infiltrates correlate with clinical antitumor response to PD1 blockade. However, not all T cell-inflamed tumors respond to PD1 blockade and not all melanomas are inflamed. Hence, the mechanisms supporting response or resistance to PD1 blockade remain to be precisely determined. One intriguing finding in the field of cancer immunotherapy is the recent demonstration that the gut microbiome regulates immune and clinical responses to PD1 blockade in murine tumor models. Mice with distinct gut microbiota profiles exhibited differential tumor growth, eliminated upon cohousing. This difference was transmittable and augmented the clinical efficacy of PD1 blockade. Interestingly, fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) together with aPD1 mAbs resulted in nearly full tumor rejection in mice with melanoma. Multiple studies have recently correlated the presence of specific bacterial commensal profile with response to PD-1 blockade in melanoma. To investigate the relevance of these findings in melanoma patients, we have collected stool from melanoma patients treated with aPD-1 mAbs. Using metagenomics, we evaluated whether PD-1 responders and PD-1 non-responders exhibited a distinct gut microbiota profile and whether the gut microbiota profile overlaps with previously published studies. We have also implemented a novel clinical trial with fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) FMT obtained from long-term PD1 responders combined with PD1 blockade in melanoma patients who failed to respond to PD1 blockade alone. This trial will determine whether the administration of a single PD1 responder-derived FMT to PD1 non-responders together with PD1 blockade is safe and can promote clinical and immune antitumor response to melanoma.

Citation Format: Diwakar Davar, Marie Anne Vetizou, Amirin Dzutsev, Jonathan Badger, John McCullogh, Carmine Menna, Ornella Pagliano, John M. Kirkwood, Giorgio Trinchieri, Hassane M. Zarour. Manipulating the gut microbiome to improve immunotherapy of melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr IA38.

Phase Ib/II Study of Pembrolizumab and Pegylated-Interferon Alfa-2b in Advanced Melanoma

PURPOSE

Objective responses are reported in 34% to 37% of patients with programmed death-1 (PD-1)-naïve advanced melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Pre-existing CD8+ T-cell infiltrate and interferon (IFN) gene signature correlate with response to PD-1 blockade. Here, we report a phase Ib/II study of pembrolizumab/pegylated (PEG)-IFN combination in PD-1-naïve advanced melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PEG-IFN (1, 2, and 3 μg/kg per week) was dose escalated using a modified toxicity probability interval design in three cohorts of four patients each, whereas pembrolizumab was dosed at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks in the phase Ib portion. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the phase II portion. Primary objectives were safety and incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Secondary objectives included objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with stage IV melanoma were enrolled in the phase Ib and II portions of the study and included in the analysis. At the data cutoff date (December 31, 2017), median follow-up duration was 25 months (range, 1 to 38 months). All 43 patients experienced at least one adverse event; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21 of 43 patients (48.8%). Objective responses were seen at all three dose levels among 43 evaluable patients. The objective response rate was 60.5%, with 46.5% of patients exhibiting ongoing response. Median PFS was 11.0 months in all patients and unreached in responders, whereas median overall survival remained unreached in all patients. The 2-year PFS rate was 46%.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab/PEG-IFN demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile with promising evidence of clinical efficacy in PD-1-naïve metastatic melanoma. These results support the rationale to further investigate this pembrolizumab/PEG-IFN combination in this disease.

CD226 opposes TIGIT to disrupt Tregs in melanoma

CD4+ Tregs impede T cell responses to tumors. They express multiple inhibitory receptors that support their suppressive functions, including T cell Ig and ITIM domain (TIGIT). In melanoma patients, we show that Tregs exhibit increased TIGIT expression and decreased expression of its competing costimulatory receptor CD226 as compared with CD4+ effector T cells, resulting in an increased TIGIT/CD226 ratio. Tregs failed to upregulate CD226 upon T cell activation. TIGIT+ Tregs are highly suppressive, stable, and enriched in tumors. TIGIT and CD226 oppose each other to augment or disrupt, respectively, Treg suppression and stability. A high TIGIT/CD226 ratio in Tregs correlates with increased Treg frequencies in tumors and poor clinical outcome upon immune checkpoint blockade. Altogether, our findings show that a high TIGIT/CD226 ratio in Tregs regulates their suppressive function and stability in melanoma. They provide the rationale for novel immunotherapies to activate CD226 in Tregs together with TIGIT blockade to counteract Treg suppression in cancer patients.

Evaluation of Biodistribution of Sulforaphane after Administration of Oral Broccoli Sprout Extract in Melanoma Patients with Multiple Atypical Nevi

Broccoli sprout extract containing sulforaphane (BSE-SFN) has been shown to inhibit ultraviolet radiation-induced damage and tumor progression in skin. This study evaluated the toxicity and potential effects of oral BSE-SFN at three dosages. Seventeen patients who each had at least 2 atypical nevi and a prior history of melanoma were randomly allocated to 50, 100, or 200 μmol oral BSE-SFN daily for 28 days. Atypical nevi were photographed on days 1 and 28, and plasma and nevus samples were taken on days 1, 2, and 28. Endpoints assessed were safety, plasma and skin sulforaphane levels, gross and histologic changes, IHC for phospho-STAT3(Y705), Ki-67, Bcl-2, HMOX1, and TUNEL, plasma cytokine levels, and tissue proteomics. All 17 patients completed 28 days with no dose-limiting toxicities. Plasma sulforaphane levels pooled for days 1, 2, and 28 showed median postadministration increases of 120 ng/mL for 50 μmol, 206 ng/mL for 100 μmol, and 655 ng/mL for 200 μmol. Median skin sulforaphane levels on day 28 were 0.0, 3.1, and 34.1 ng/g for 50, 100, and 200 μmol, respectively. Plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines decreased from day 1 to 28. The tumor suppressor decorin was increased from day 1 to 28. Oral BSE-SFN is well tolerated at daily doses up to 200 μmol and achieves dose-dependent levels in plasma and skin. A larger efficacy evaluation of 200 μmol daily for longer intervals is now reasonable to better characterize clinical and biological effects of BSE-SFN as chemoprevention for melanoma. Cancer Prev Res; 11(7); 429-38. ©2018 AACR.

Phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in combination with azacitidine in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer

3054

Background: Microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has relatively poor tumoral infiltration of CD8+ T cells and is resistant to pembrolizumab (Pembro) when compared to MSI-H mCRC. DNA hypomethylating agent induces epigenetic expression of multiple genes including cancer-testis antigens in CRC, which are recognized by cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in vitro and in vivo. This trial tested whether concurrent treatment with azacitidine (Aza) could enhance the anti-tumor activity of Pembro. Methods: This is a phase 2 trial to evaluate anti-tumor activity and safety of Pembro plus Aza in patients (pts) with previously treated mCRC without any further standard chemotherapy option. Pts received Pembro 200 mg IV on day 1 of each cycle Q3W and Aza 100 mg daily SQ injection on days 1-5 of each cycle Q3W. Primary endpoint was response rate (ORR) using RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumor tissues were collected for correlative studies. Results: Thirty-one pts were enrolled [median age, 61 years (range, 30-79); 17 M/14 F; ECOG PS 0/1 (58%/42%); 30 pts with MSS mCRC]. Pts received at least 2 lines of prior systemic chemotherapy for mCRC (median, 3; range, 1-5). Thirty pts received at least one dose of study therapy (median, 3 cycles; range, 1-8). Ten pts could not complete the first 3 cycles due to rapid symptomatic tumor progression. One pt with MSS mCRC achieved PR and 3 pts had SD as best response. The ORR was 3% (1/30; 95% CI, 0.1-17%). Seven pts with PD at the end of cycle 3 continued on study therapy, and 2 pts had stabilization of tumor progression. Median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.8), and median OS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 3.5-8.7). While treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 63% of pts, most of the TRAEs were Gr 1/2 (96%). Frequent TRAEs possibly related to Aza were anemia (n = 5), constipation (n = 5), and leukopenia (n = 4); and possibly related to both Aza and Pembro were nausea (n = 5) and fatigue (n = 5). Gr 3 TRAEs included anemia (n = 1), ALT elevation (n = 1), and alkaline phosphatase elevation (n = 1). Conclusions: Pembro plus Aza is feasible with a tolerable safety profile but appears to have minimal anti-tumor effect for MSS mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02260440.

Emerging Opportunities and Challenges in Cancer Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy strategies against cancer are emerging as powerful weapons for treatment of this disease. The success of checkpoint inhibitors against metastatic melanoma and adoptive T-cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor T cells against B-cell-derived leukemias and lymphomas are only two examples of developments that are changing the paradigms of clinical cancer management. These changes are a result of many years of intense research into complex and interrelated cellular and molecular mechanisms controling immune responses. Promising advances come from the discovery of cancer mutation-encoded neoantigens, improvements in vaccine development, progress in delivery of cellular therapies, and impressive achievements in biotechnology. As a result, radical transformation of cancer treatment is taking place in which conventional cancer treatments are being integrated with immunotherapeutic agents. Many clinical trials are in progress testing potential synergistic effects of treatments combining immunotherapy with other therapies. Much remains to be learned about the selection, delivery, and off-target effects of immunotherapy used alone or in combination. The existence of numerous escape mechanisms from the host immune system that human tumors have evolved still is a barrier to success. Efforts to understand the rules of immune cell dysfunction and of cancer-associated local and systemic immune suppression are providing new insights and fuel the enthusiasm for new therapeutic strategies. In the future, it might be possible to tailor immune therapy for each cancer patient. The use of new immune biomarkers and the ability to assess responses to therapy by noninvasive monitoring promise to improve early cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Personalized immunotherapy based on individual genetic, molecular, and immune profiling is a potentially achievable future goal. The current excitement for immunotherapy is justified in view of many existing opportunities for harnessing the immune system to treat cancer.

Reversing T-cell Dysfunction and Exhaustion in Cancer

In the context of chronic antigen exposure in chronic viral infections and cancer, T cells become exhausted/dysfunctional. These exhausted T cells exhibit defective proliferative capacities and cytokine production, but are not totally inert and may exert lytic functions. Importantly, exhausted T cells upregulate multiple inhibitory receptors/immune checkpoints that bind to their ligands expressed by tumor cells and antigen-presenting cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Immune checkpoint blockades with anti-CTL antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and/or anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) mAbs successfully reinvigorate tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes and provide persistent clinical benefits to a large number of patients with advanced cancer. This great and long-awaited success for the immunotherapy of cancer has infused considerable enthusiasm in the field of oncology and fostered the development of combinatorial strategies to target the multiple mechanisms of tumor-induced T-cell dysfunction. Here, we review the critical immunoregulatory mechanisms driving T-cell exhaustion in the TME. We also discuss the development of promising combinatorial immunotherapies to counteract the mechanisms of tumor-induced T-cell dysfunction to improve the clinical efficacy of current immune checkpoint blockades. As our understanding of the mechanisms supporting tumor-induced T-cell dysfunction improves based upon preclinical and clinical studies, we expect that novel combinatorial immunotherapies will emerge to improve the clinical outcome of patients with advanced cancers.

Melanoma and immunotherapy bridge 2015 : Naples, Italy. 1-5 December 2015

MELANOMA BRIDGE 2015

KEYNOTE SPEAKER PRESENTATIONS

Molecular and immuno-advances

K1 Immunologic and metabolic consequences of PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation in melanoma

Vashisht G. Y. Nanda, Weiyi Peng, Patrick Hwu, Michael A. Davies

K2 Non-mutational adaptive changes in melanoma cells exposed to BRAF and MEK inhibitors help the establishment of drug resistance

Gennaro Ciliberto, Luigi Fattore, Debora Malpicci, Luigi Aurisicchio, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Carlo M. Croce, Rita Mancini

K3 Tumor-intrinsic beta-catenin signaling mediates tumor-immune avoidance

Stefani Spranger, Thomas F. Gajewski

K4 Intracellular tumor antigens as a source of targets of antibody-based immunotherapy of melanoma

Yangyang Wang, Soldano Ferrone

Combination therapies

K5 Harnessing radiotherapy to improve responses to immunotherapy in cancer

Claire Vanpouille-Box, Erik Wennerberg, Karsten A. Pilones, Silvia C. Formenti, Sandra Demaria

K6 Creating a T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment overcomes resistance to checkpoint blockade

Haidong Tang, Yang Wang, Yang-Xin Fu

K7 Biomarkers for treatment decisions?

Reinhard Dummer

K8 Combining oncolytic therapies in the era of checkpoint inhibitors

Igor Puzanov

K9 Immune checkpoint blockade for melanoma: should we combine or sequence ipilimumab and PD-1 antibody therapy?

Michael A. Postow

News in immunotherapy

K10 An update on adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for melanom

Ahmad Tarhini

K11 Targeting multiple inhibitory receptors in melanoma

Joe-Marc Chauvin, Ornella Pagliano, Julien Fourcade, Zhaojun Sun, Hong Wang, Cindy Sanders, John M. Kirkwood, Tseng-hui Timothy Chen, Mark Maurer, Alan J. Korman, Hassane M. Zarour

K12 Improving adoptive immune therapy using genetically engineered T cells

David F. Stroncek

Tumor microenvironment and biomarkers

K13 Myeloid cells and tumor exosomes: a crosstalk for assessing immunosuppression?

Veronica Huber, Licia Rivoltini

K14 Update on the SITC biomarker taskforce: progress and challenges

Magdalena Thurin

World-wide immunoscore task force: an update

K15 The immunoscore in colorectal cancer highlights the importance of digital scoring systems in surgical pathology

Tilman Rau, Alessandro Lugli

K16 The immunoscore: toward an integrated immunomonitoring from the diagnosis to the follow up of cancer’s patients

Franck Pagès

Economic sustainability of melanoma treatments: regulatory, health technology assessment and market access issues

K17 Nivolumab, the regulatory experience in immunotherapy

Jorge Camarero, Arantxa Sancho

K18 Evidence to optimize access for immunotherapies

Claudio Jommi

ORAL PRESENTATIONS

Molecular and immuno-advances

O1 Ipilimumab treatment results in CD4 T cell activation that is concomitant with a reduction in Tregs and MDSCs

Yago Pico de Coaña, Maria Wolodarski, Yuya Yoshimoto, Giusy Gentilcore, Isabel Poschke, Giuseppe V. Masucci, Johan Hansson, Rolf Kiessling

O2 Evaluation of prognostic and therapeutic potential of COX-2 and PD-L1 in primary and metastatic melanoma

Giosuè Scognamiglio, Francesco Sabbatino, Federica Zito Marino, Anna Maria Anniciello, Monica Cantile, Margherita Cerrone, Stefania Scala, Crescenzo D’alterio, Angela Ianaro, Giuseppe Cirino, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Giuseppina Liguori, Gerardo Botti

O3 Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation–positive metastatic melanoma: final overall survival results of the BRIM-3 study

Paul B. Chapman, Caroline Robert, James Larkin, John B. Haanen, Antoni Ribas, David Hogg, Omid Hamid, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Alessandro Testori, Paul Lorigan, Reinhard Dummer, Jeffrey A. Sosman, Keith T. Flaherty, Huibin Yue, Shelley Coleman, Ivor Caro, Axel Hauschild, Grant A. McArthur

O4 Updated survival, response and safety data in a phase 1 dose-finding study (CA209-004) of concurrent nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI) in advanced melanoma

Mario Sznol, Margaret K. Callahan, Harriet Kluger, Michael A. Postow, RuthAnn Gordan, Neil H. Segal, Naiyer A. Rizvi, Alexander Lesokhin, Michael B. Atkins, John M. Kirkwood, Matthew M. Burke, Amanda Ralabate, Angel Rivera, Stephanie A. Kronenberg, Blessing Agunwamba, Mary Ruisi, Christine Horak, Joel Jiang, Jedd Wolchok

Combination therapies

O5 Efficacy and correlative biomarker analysis of the coBRIM study comparing cobimetinib (COBI) + vemurafenib (VEM) vs placebo (PBO) + VEM in advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma patients (pts)

Paolo A. Ascierto, Grant A. McArthur, James Larkin, Gabriella Liszkay, Michele Maio, Mario Mandalà, Lev Demidov, Daniil Stoyakovskiy, Luc Thomas, Luis de la Cruz-Merino, Victoria Atkinson, Caroline Dutriaux, Claus Garbe, Matthew Wongchenko, Ilsung Chang, Daniel O. Koralek, Isabelle Rooney, Yibing Yan, Antoni Ribas, Brigitte Dréno

O6 Preliminary clinical safety, tolerability and activity results from a Phase Ib study of atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) combined with vemurafenib in BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma

Ryan Sullivan, Omid Hamid, Manish Patel, Stephen Hodi, Rodabe Amaria, Peter Boasberg, Jeffrey Wallin, Xian He, Edward Cha, Nicole Richie, Marcus Ballinger, Patrick Hwu

O7 Preliminary safety and efficacy data from a phase 1/2 study of epacadostat (INCB024360) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma

Thomas F. Gajewski, Omid Hamid, David C. Smith, Todd M. Bauer, Jeffrey S. Wasser, Jason J. Luke, Ani S. Balmanoukian, David R. Kaufman, Yufan Zhao, Janet Maleski, Lance Leopold, Tara C. Gangadhar

O8 Primary analysis of MASTERKEY-265 phase 1b study of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and pembrolizumab (pembro) for unresectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma

Reinhard Dummer, Georgina V. Long, Antoni Ribas, Igor Puzanov, Olivier Michielin, Ari VanderWalde, Robert H.I. Andtbacka, Jonathan Cebon, Eugenio Fernandez, Josep Malvehy, Anthony J. Olszanski, Thomas F. Gajewski, John M. Kirkwood, Christine Gause, Lisa Chen, David R. Kaufman, Jeffrey Chou, F. Stephen Hodi

News in immunotherapy

O9 Two-year survival and safety update in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve advanced melanoma (MEL) receiving nivolumab (NIVO) or dacarbazine (DTIC) in CheckMate 066

Victoria Atkinson, Paolo A. Ascierto, Georgina V. Long, Benjamin Brady, Caroline Dutriaux, Michele Maio, Laurent Mortier, Jessica C. Hassel, Piotr Rutkowski, Catriona McNeil, Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha, Celeste Lebbé, Lars Ny, Matias Chacon, Paola Queirolo, Carmen Loquai, Parneet Cheema, Alfonso Berrocal, Karmele Mujika Eizmendi, Luis De La Cruz-Merino, Gil Bar-Sela, Christine Horak, Joel Jiang, Helene Hardy, Caroline Robert

O10 Efficacy and safety of nivolumab (NIVO) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) who were treated beyond progression in CheckMate 066/067

Georgina V. Long, Jeffrey S. Weber, James Larkin, Victoria Atkinson, Jean-Jacques Grob, Reinhard Dummer, Caroline Robert, Ivan Marquez-Rodas, Catriona McNeil, Henrik Schmidt, Karen Briscoe, Jean-François Baurain, F. Stephen Hodi, Jedd D. Wolchok

Tumor microenvironment and biomarkers

O11 New biomarkers for response/resistance to BRAF inhibitor therapy in metastatic melanoma

Rosamaria Pinto, Simona De Summa, Vito Michele Garrisi, Sabino Strippoli, Amalia Azzariti, Gabriella Guida, Michele Guida, Stefania Tommasi

O12 Chemokine receptor patterns in lymphocytes mirror metastatic spreading in melanoma and response to ipilimumab

Nicolas Jacquelot, David Enot, Caroline Flament, Jonathan M. Pitt, Nadège Vimond, Carolin Blattner, Takahiro Yamazaki, Maria-Paula Roberti, Marie Vetizou, Romain Daillere, Vichnou Poirier-Colame, Michaëla Semeraro, Anne Caignard, Craig L Slingluff Jr, Federica Sallusto, Sylvie Rusakiewicz, Benjamin Weide, Aurélien Marabelle, Holbrook Kohrt, Stéphane Dalle, Andréa Cavalcanti, Guido Kroemer, Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Michaele Maio, Phillip Wong, Jianda Yuan, Jedd Wolchok, Viktor Umansky, Alexander Eggermont, Laurence Zitvogel

O13 Serum levels of PD1- and CD28-positive exosomes before Ipilimumab correlate with therapeutic response in metastatic melanoma patients

Passarelli Anna, Tucci Marco, Stucci Stefania, Mannavola Francesco, Capone Mariaelena, Madonna Gabriele, Ascierto Paolo Antonio, Silvestris Franco

O14 Immunological prognostic factors in stage III melanomas

María Paula Roberti, Nicolas Jacquelot, David P Enot, Sylvie Rusakiewicz, Michaela Semeraro, Sarah Jégou, Camila Flores, Lieping Chen, Byoung S. Kwon, Ana Carrizossa Anderson, Caroline Robert, Christophe Borg, Benjamin Weide, François Aubin, Stéphane Dalle, Michele Maio, Jedd D. Wolchok, Holbrook Kohrt, Maha Ayyoub, Guido Kroemer, Aurélien Marabelle, Andréa Cavalcanti, Alexander Eggermont, Laurence Zitvogel

POSTER PRESENTATIONS

Molecular and immuno-advances

P1 Human melanoma cells resistant to B-RAF and MEK inhibition exhibit mesenchymal-like features

Anna Lisa De Presbiteris, Fabiola Gilda Cordaro, Rosa Camerlingo, Federica Fratangelo, Nicola Mozzillo, Giuseppe Pirozzi, Eduardo J. Patriarca, Paolo A. Ascierto, Emilia Caputo

P2 Anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effect of ABT888 on melanoma cell lines and its potential role in the treatment of melanoma resistant to B-RAF inhibitors

Federica Fratangelo, Rosa Camerlingo, Emilia Caputo, Maria Letizia Motti, Rosaria Falcone, Roberta Miceli, Mariaelena Capone, Gabriele Madonna, Domenico Mallardo, Maria Vincenza Carriero, Giuseppe Pirozzi and Paolo Antonio Ascierto

P3 Involvement of the L-cysteine/CSE/H2S pathway in human melanoma progression

Elisabetta Panza, Paola De Cicco, Chiara Armogida, Giuseppe Ercolano, Rosa Camerlingo, Giuseppe Pirozzi, Giosuè Scognamiglio, Gerardo Botti, Giuseppe Cirino, Angela Ianaro

P4 Cancer stem cell antigen revealing pattern of antibody variable region genes were defined by immunoglobulin repertoire analysis in patients with malignant melanoma

Beatrix Kotlan, Gabriella Liszkay, Miri Blank, Timea Balatoni, Judit Olasz, Emil Farkas, Andras Szollar, Akos Savolt, Maria Godeny, Orsolya Csuka, Szabolcs Horvath, Klara Eles, Yehuda Shoenfeld and Miklos Kasler

P5 Upregulation of Neuregulin-1 expression is a hallmark of adaptive response to BRAF/MEK inhibitors in melanoma

Debora Malpicci, Luigi Fattore, Susan Costantini, Francesca Capone, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Rita Mancini, Gennaro Ciliberto

P6 HuR positively regulates migration of HTB63 melanoma cells

Farnaz Moradi, Pontus Berglund, Karin Leandersson, Rickard Linnskog, Tommy Andersson, Chandra Prakash Prasad

P7 Prolyl 4- (C-P4H) hydroxylases have opposing effects in malignant melanoma: implication in prognosis and therapy

Cristiana Lo Nigro, Laura Lattanzio, Hexiao Wang, Charlotte Proby, Nelofer Syed, Marcella Occelli, Carolina Cauchi, Marco Merlano, Catherine Harwood, Alastair Thompson, Tim Crook

P8 Urokinase receptor antagonists: novel agents for the treatment of melanoma

Maria Letizia Motti, Katia Bifulco, Vincenzo Ingangi, Michele Minopoli, Concetta Ragone, Federica Fratangelo, Antonello Pessi, Gennaro Ciliberto, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Maria Vincenza Carriero

P9 Exosomes released by melanoma cell lines enhance chemotaxis of primary tumor cells

Francesco Mannavola, Stella D’Oronzo, Claudia Felici, Marco Tucci, Antonio Doronzo, Franco Silvestris

P10 New insights in mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming in melanoma

Anna Ferretta, Gabriella Guida, Stefania Guida, Imma Maida, Tiziana Cocco, Sabino Strippoli, Stefania Tommasi, Amalia Azzariti, Michele Guida

P11 Lenalidomide restrains the proliferation in melanoma cells through a negative regulation of their cell cycle

Stella D’Oronzo, Anna Passarelli, Claudia Felici, Marco Tucci, Davide Quaresmini, Franco Silvestris

Combination therapies

P12 Chemoimmunotherapy elicits polyfunctional anti-tumor CD8 + T cells depending on the activation of an AKT pathway sustained by ICOS

Ornella Franzese, Belinda Palermo, Cosmo Di Donna, Isabella Sperduti, MariaLaura Foddai, Helena Stabile, Angela Gismondi, Angela Santoni, Paola Nisticò

P13 Favourable toxicity profile of combined BRAF and MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma patients

Andrea P. Sponghini, Francesca Platini, Elena Marra, David Rondonotti, Oscar Alabiso, Maria T. Fierro, Paola Savoia, Florian Stratica, Pietro Quaglino

P14 Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system dissection reduces seroma output or time to drain removal following axillary and ilio-inguinal node dissection in melanoma patients: a pilot study

Di Monta Gianluca, Caracò Corrado, Di Marzo Massimiliano, Marone Ugo, Di Cecilia Maria Luisa, Mozzillo Nicola

News in immunotherapy

P15 Clinical and immunological response to ipilimumab in a metastatic melanoma patient with HIV infection

Francesco Sabbatino, Celeste Fusciello1, Antonio Marra, Rosario Guarrasi, Carlo Baldi, Rosa Russo, Di Giulio Giovanni, Vincenzo Faiola, Pio Zeppa, Stefano Pepe

P16 Immunotherapy and hypophysitis: a case report

Elisabetta Gambale, Consiglia Carella, Alessandra Di Paolo, Michele De Tursi

Tumor microenvironment and biomarkers

P17 New immuno- histochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of atypical melanocytic lesions with uncertain malignant potential

Laura Marra, Giosuè Scognamiglio, Monica Cantile, Margherita Cerrone, Fara De Murtas, Valeria Sorrentino, Anna Maria Anniciello, Gerardo Botti

P18 Utility of simultaneous measurement of three serum tumor markers in melanoma patients

Angela Sandru, Silviu Voinea, Eugenia Panaitescu, Madalina Bolovan, Adina Stanciu, Sabin Cinca

P19 The significance of various cut-off levels of melanoma inhibitory activity in evaluation of cutaneous melanoma patients

Angela Sandru, Silviu Voinea, Eugenia Panaitescu, Madalina Bolovan, Adina Stanciu, Sabin Cinca

P20 The long noncoding RNA HOTAIR is associated to metastatic progression of melanoma and it can be identified in the blood of patients with advanced disease

Chiara Botti, Giosuè Scognamiglio, Laura Marra, Gabriella Aquino, Rosaria Falcone, Annamaria Anniciello, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Gerardo Botti, Monica Cantile

Other

P21 The effect of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in melanoma mortality: timing of dissection

Cristina Fortes, Simona Mastroeni, Alessio Caggiati, Francesca Passarelli, Alba Zappalà, Maria Capuano, Riccardo Bono, Maurizio Nudo, Claudia Marino, Paola Michelozzi

P22 Epidemiological survey on related psychopathology in melanoma

Valeria De Biasio, Vincenzo C. Battarra

IMMUNOTHERAPY BRIDGE

KEYNOTE SPEAKER PRESENTATIONS

Immunotherapy beyond melanoma

K19 Predictor of response to radiation and immunotherapy

Silvia Formenti

K20 Response and resistance to PD-1 pathway blockade: clues from the tumor microenvironment

Maria Libera Ascierto, Tracee L. McMiller, Alan E. Berger, Ludmila Danilova, Robert A. Anders, George J. Netto, Haiying Xu, Theresa S. Pritchard, Jinshui Fan, Chris Cheadle, Leslie Cope, Charles G. Drake, Drew M. Pardoll, Janis M. Taube and Suzanne L. Topalian

K21 Combination immunotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation, protein immunization, and PBMC reinfusion in myeloma patients

Sacha Gnjatic, Sarah Nataraj, Naoko Imai, Adeeb Rahman, Achim A. Jungbluth, Linda Pan, Ralph Venhaus, Andrew Park, Frédéric F. Lehmann, Nikoletta Lendvai, Adam D. Cohen, and Hearn J. Cho

K22 Anti-cancer immunity despite T cell “exhaustion”

Speiser Daniel

Immunotherapy in oncology (I-O): data from clinical trial

K23 The Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Vera Hirsh

Future perspectives in melanoma research: meeting report from the "Melanoma Bridge": Napoli, December 3rd-6th 2014

The fourth "Melanoma Bridge Meeting" took place in Naples, December 3-6th, 2014. The four topics discussed at this meeting were: Molecular and Immunological Advances, Combination Therapies, News in Immunotherapy, and Tumor Microenvironment and Biomarkers. Until recently systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma patients was ineffective, but recent advances in tumor biology and immunology have led to the development of new targeted and immunotherapeutic agents that prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). New therapies, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibitors as well as other signaling pathway inhibitors, are being tested in patients with metastatic melanoma either as monotherapy or in combination, and all have yielded promising results. These include inhibitors of receptor tyrosine kinases (BRAF, MEK, and VEGFR), the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway [PI3K, AKT, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)], activators of apoptotic pathway, and the cell cycle inhibitors (CDK4/6). Various locoregional interventions including radiotherapy and surgery are still valid approaches in treatment of advanced melanoma that can be integrated with novel therapies. Intrinsic, adaptive and acquired resistance occur with targeted therapy such as BRAF inhibitors, where most responses are short-lived. Given that the reactivation of the MAPK pathway through several distinct mechanisms is responsible for the majority of acquired resistance, it is logical to combine BRAF inhibitors with inhibitors of targets downstream in the MAPK pathway. For example, combination of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (e.g., dabrafenib/trametinib) have been demonstrated to improve survival compared to monotherapy. Application of novel technologies such sequencing have proven useful as a tool for identification of MAPK pathway-alternative resistance mechanism and designing other combinatorial therapies such as those between BRAF and AKT inhibitors. Improved survival rates have also been observed with immune-targeted therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma. Immune-modulating antibodies came to the forefront with anti-CTLA-4, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway blocking antibodies that result in durable responses in a subset of melanoma patients. Agents targeting other immune inhibitory (e.g., Tim-3) or immune stimulating (e.g., CD137) receptors and other approaches such as adoptive cell transfer demonstrate clinical benefit in patients with melanoma as well. These agents are being studied in combination with targeted therapies in attempt to produce longer-term responses than those more typically seen with targeted therapy. Other combinations with cytotoxic chemotherapy and inhibitors of angiogenesis are changing the evolving landscape of therapeutic options and are being evaluated to prevent or delay resistance and to further improve survival rates for this patient population. This meeting's specific focus was on advances in combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Both combination targeted therapy approaches and different immunotherapies were discussed. Similarly to the previous meetings, the importance of biomarkers for clinical application as markers for diagnosis, prognosis and prediction of treatment response was an integral part of the meeting. The overall emphasis on biomarkers supports novel concepts toward integrating biomarkers into contemporary clinical management of patients with melanoma across the entire spectrum of disease stage. Translation of the knowledge gained from the biology of tumor microenvironment across different tumors represents a bridge to impact on prognosis and response to therapy in melanoma.