Noninvasive options for 'wearing-off' in Parkinson's disease: a clinical consensus from a panel of UK Parkinson's disease specialists

Advanced Parkinson's disease treatment patterns in Italy: an observational study interim analysis

BACKGROUND

Oral levodopa remains the mainstay of treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, as PD progresses, response to treatment may fluctuate. Managing fluctuations can be demanding for clinicians and patients. There is a paucity of real-world studies reporting on PD management in patients with fluctuations in treatment response, especially in patients with advanced stages of PD. The multicentre, observational Parkinson's Disease Fluctuations treatment PAthway (PD-FPA) study describes the real-life management of response fluctuations in Italian patients with advanced PD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PD-FPA had a retrospective and prospective phase; herein, retrospective results are presented. Ten Italian centres enrolled patients with a PD diagnosis from 10-15 years prior to study entry (T0) and who had ≥2-year history of fluctuations. Data on patient demographics, medical history, PD stage, fluctuation characteristics, symptoms, and prescribed treatments were collected at T0 and retrospectively (2 years prior to T0) via patient chart review/interview.

RESULTS

Overall, 296 patients (60% male, mean age 68 years, 84% with Hoehn and Yahr scores 2-3) were enrolled. At T0, most patients (99.3%) were on oral levodopa therapy. All patients used dopaminergic medications; adjunctive medications included dopamine agonists (56%) and monoamine oxidase B (60%) and catechol-O-methyltransferase enzyme inhibitors (41%). At T0, 51% of patients had changed therapy, with response fluctuations being the most common reason (74%); wearing-off was the most common fluctuation (83%).

CONCLUSION

This interim analysis of PD-FPA suggests that adequate levodopa dosing and adjunctive medications can stabilize advanced PD and provide patients with a good quality of life.

Addressing Comorbidities in People with Parkinson's Disease: Considerations From An Expert Panel

In the UK, guidance exists to aid clinicians and patients deciding when treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) should be initiated and which therapies to consider. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends that before starting PD treatment clinicians should discuss the following: the patient's individual clinical circumstances; lifestyle; preferences; needs and goals; as well as the potential benefits and harms of the different drug classes. Individualization of medicines and management in PD significantly improves patients' outcomes and quality of life. This article aims to provide simple and practical guidance to help clinicians address common, but often overlooked, co-morbidities. A multi-disciplinary group of PD experts discussed areas where clinical care can be improved by addressing commonly found co-morbidities in people with Parkinson's (PwP) based on clinical experience and existing literature, in a roundtable meeting organized and funded by Bial Pharma UK Ltd. The experts identified four core areas (bone health, cardiovascular risk, anticholinergic burden, and sleep quality) that, if further standardized may improve treatment outcomes for PwP patients. Focusing on anticholinergic burden, cardiac risk, sleep, and bone health could offer a significant contribution to personalizing regimes for PwP and improving overall patient outcomes. Within this opinion-based paper, the experts offer a list of guiding factors to help practitioners in the management of PwP.

An Exploration of Wearable Device Features Used in UK Hospital Parkinson Disease Care: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of Parkinson disease (PD) is becoming an increasing concern owing to the aging population in the United Kingdom. Wearable devices have the potential to improve the clinical care of patients with PD while reducing health care costs. Consequently, exploring the features of these wearable devices is important to identify the limitations and further areas of investigation of how wearable devices are currently used in clinical care in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE

In this scoping review, we aimed to explore the features of wearable devices used for PD in hospitals in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A scoping review of the current research was undertaken and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The literature search was undertaken on June 6, 2022, and publications were obtained from MEDLINE or PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible publications were initially screened by their titles and abstracts. Publications that passed the initial screening underwent a full review. The study characteristics were extracted from the final publications, and the evidence was synthesized using a narrative approach. Any queries were reviewed by the first and second authors.

RESULTS

Of the 4543 publications identified, 39 (0.86%) publications underwent a full review, and 20 (0.44%) publications were included in the scoping review. Most studies (11/20, 55%) were conducted at the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 418. Most study participants were male individuals with a mean age ranging from 57.7 to 78.0 years. The AX3 was the most popular device brand used, and it was commercially manufactured by Axivity. Common wearable device types included body-worn sensors, inertial measurement units, and smartwatches that used accelerometers and gyroscopes to measure the clinical features of PD. Most wearable device primary measures involved the measured gait, bradykinesia, and dyskinesia. The most common wearable device placements were the lumbar region, head, and wrist. Furthermore, 65% (13/20) of the studies used artificial intelligence or machine learning to support PD data analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that wearable devices could help provide a more detailed analysis of PD symptoms during the assessment phase and personalize treatment. Using machine learning, wearable devices could differentiate PD from other neurodegenerative diseases. The identified evidence gaps include the lack of analysis of wearable device cybersecurity and data management. The lack of cost-effectiveness analysis and large-scale participation in studies resulted in uncertainty regarding the feasibility of the widespread use of wearable devices. The uncertainty around the identified research gaps was further exacerbated by the lack of medical regulation of wearable devices for PD, particularly in the United Kingdom where regulations were changing due to the political landscape.

The Dashboard Vitals of Parkinson's: Not to Be Missed Yet an Unmet Need

The vitals of Parkinson's disease (PD) address the often-ignored symptoms, which are considered either peripheral to the central core of motor symptoms of PD or secondary symptoms, which, nevertheless, have a key role in the quality of life (QoL) and wellness of people with Parkinson's (PwP) [...].

An Exploration of Wearable Device Features Used in UK Hospital Parkinson Disease Care: Scoping Review (Preprint).. [DOI: 10.2196/preprints.42950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of Parkinson disease (PD) is becoming an increasing concern owing to the aging population in the United Kingdom. Wearable devices have the potential to improve the clinical care of patients with PD while reducing health care costs. Consequently, exploring the features of these wearable devices is important to identify the limitations and further areas of investigation of how wearable devices are currently used in clinical care in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE

In this scoping review, we aimed to explore the features of wearable devices used for PD in hospitals in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A scoping review of the current research was undertaken and reported according to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The literature search was undertaken on June 6, 2022, and publications were obtained from MEDLINE or PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible publications were initially screened by their titles and abstracts. Publications that passed the initial screening underwent a full review. The study characteristics were extracted from the final publications, and the evidence was synthesized using a narrative approach. Any queries were reviewed by the first and second authors.

RESULTS

Of the 4543 publications identified, 39 (0.86%) publications underwent a full review, and 20 (0.44%) publications were included in the scoping review. Most studies (11/20, 55%) were conducted at the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 418. Most study participants were male individuals with a mean age ranging from 57.7 to 78.0 years. The AX3 was the most popular device brand used, and it was commercially manufactured by Axivity. Common wearable device types included body-worn sensors, inertial measurement units, and smartwatches that used accelerometers and gyroscopes to measure the clinical features of PD. Most wearable device primary measures involved the measured gait, bradykinesia, and dyskinesia. The most common wearable device placements were the lumbar region, head, and wrist. Furthermore, 65% (13/20) of the studies used artificial intelligence or machine learning to support PD data analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that wearable devices could help provide a more detailed analysis of PD symptoms during the assessment phase and personalize treatment. Using machine learning, wearable devices could differentiate PD from other neurodegenerative diseases. The identified evidence gaps include the lack of analysis of wearable device cybersecurity and data management. The lack of cost-effectiveness analysis and large-scale participation in studies resulted in uncertainty regarding the feasibility of the widespread use of wearable devices. The uncertainty around the identified research gaps was further exacerbated by the lack of medical regulation of wearable devices for PD, particularly in the United Kingdom where regulations were changing due to the political landscape.

CLINICALTRIAL

Collapse

Systematic Review on Parkinson's Disease Medications, Emphasizing on Three Recently Approved Drugs to Control Parkinson's Symptoms

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a disease that involves neurodegeneration and is characterised by the motor symptoms which include muscle rigidity, tremor, and bradykinesia. Other non-motor symptoms include pain, depression, anxiety, and psychosis. This disease affects up to ten million people worldwide. The pathophysiology behind PD is due to the neurodegeneration of the nigrostriatal pathway. There are many conventional drugs used in the treatment of PD. However, there are limitations associated with conventional drugs. For instance, levodopa is associated with the on-off phenomenon, and it may induce wearing off as time progresses. Therefore, this review aimed to analyze the newly approved drugs by the United States-Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) from 2016-2019 as the adjuvant therapy for the treatment of PD symptoms in terms of efficacy and safety. The new drugs include safinamide, istradefylline and pimavanserin. From this review, safinamide is considered to be more efficacious and safer as the adjunct therapy to levodopa as compared to istradefylline in controlling the motor symptoms. In Study 016, both safinamide 50 mg (p = 0.0138) and 100 mg (p = 0.0006) have improved the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III score as compared to placebo. Improvement in Clinical Global Impression-Change (CGI-C), Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and off time were also seen in both groups of patients following the morning levodopa dose. Pimavanserin also showed favorable effects in ameliorating the symptoms of Parkinson's Disease Psychosis (PDP). A combination of conventional therapy and non-pharmacological treatment is warranted to enhance the well-being of PD patients.

Metabolism and disposition of opicapone in the rat and metabolic enzymes phenotyping

Opicapone (2,5‐dichloro‐3‐(5‐(3,4‐dihydroxy‐5‐nitrophenyl)‐1,2,4‐oxadiazol‐3‐yl)‐4,6‐dimethylpyridine 1‐oxide) is a selective catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitor that has been granted marketing authorization in Europe, Japan, and United States. The present work describes the metabolism and disposition of opicapone in the rat obtained in support to its development and regulatory filling. Plasma levels and elimination of total radioactivity were determined after oral and intravenous administration of [¹⁴C]‐opicapone. The maximum plasma concentrations of opicapone‐related radioactivity were reached at early time points followed by a gradual return to baseline with a biphasic elimination. Fecal excretion was the primary route of elimination of total radioactivity. Quantitative distribution of drug‐related radioactivity demonstrated that opicapone and related metabolites did not distribute to the central nervous system. Opicapone was extensively metabolized in rats resulting in more than 20 phase I and phase II metabolites. Although O‐glucuronidation, ‐sulfation, and ‐methylation of the nitrocatechol moiety were the principal metabolic pathways, small amount of the N‐acetyl derivative was detected, as a result of reduction of the nitro group and subsequent conjugation. Other metabolic transformations included N‐oxide reduction to the pyridine derivative and reductive cleavage of 1,2,4‐oxadiazole ring followed by further conjugative reactions. Reaction phenotyping studies suggested that SULT 1A1*1 and *2 and UGT1A7, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, and UGT1A10 may be involved in opicapone sulfation and glucuronidation, respectively. However, the reductive metabolic pathways mediated by gut microflora cannot be excluded. Opicapone, in the rat, was found to be rapidly absorbed, widely distributed to peripheric tissues, metabolized mainly via conjugative pathways at the nitro catechol ring, and primarily excreted via feces.

Different Catechol-O-Methyl Transferase Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common, chronic, progressive, debilitating neurodegenerative disease. The current levodopa treatment requires the addition of other drugs, such as catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors, to alleviate motor fluctuations in advanced PD. Therefore, a theoretical reference for treatment is urgently needed. In this study, an appropriate search strategy was used to screen eligible studies on different drugs to treat patients with PD from the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. The publication dates were from January 1990 to June 2021. We integrated eligible randomized controlled trials, and statistical analysis was performed on three kinds of effectiveness outcomes and two types of safety outcomes. We assessed the average difference or odds ratio between each drug and placebo and summarized them as the average and 95% confidence interval (CI), respectively. In terms of efficacy, entacapone (mean difference [MD], 0.64 h; 95% CI, 0.29–1.0), opicapone (MD, 0.92 h; 95% CI, 0.35–1.5), and tolcapone (MD, 3.2 h; 95% CI, 2.1–4.2) increased patients' total ON-time compared to placebo. Tolcapone (MD, −100 mg; 95% CI −160 to −45) reduced the total daily dose of levodopa therapy. None of these three drugs was found to have statistical significance in mean change from baseline in UPDRS part III scores when compared with others. In terms of safety, tolcapone (MD, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.1–6.8), opicapone (MD, 3.7; 95% CI, 2–7.2), and entacapone (MD, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5–3.3) increased the number of cases of dyskinesia compared to placebo. Entacapone (MD, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3–2.2) and tolcapone (MD, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3–15) were more likely to cause adverse events than placebo. In conclusion, opicapone showed higher efficiency and fewer safety problems in five indicators we selected when compared with the other two drugs.

Opicapone and Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel Infusion: The Way Forward Towards Cost Savings for Healthcare Systems?

Combined catechol-O-methyl-transferase-inhibition and Levodopa-Carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) infusion has the potential to reduce LCIG daily dose and the costs of this therapy. In this retrospective analysis, we report on Parkinson's disease (PD) patients on LCIG with concomitant Opicapone. In 11 patients, the introduction of Opicapone led to LCIG daily dose being reduced by 24.8% (p = 0.05) without any significant worsening of dyskinesia. Three patients withdrew from Opicapone due to side effects or inefficacy. LCIG daily dose reduction could lead to cost savings of £142,820.63/year in the United Kingdom while maintaining clinical care.

Opicapone for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a review

Purpose: Levodopa formulations are the workhorses of the labor against motor symptoms management in Parkinson's disease (PD). Progression of PD on levodopa inevitably leads to motor fluctuations. It is important to understand the safety and efficacy of opicapone, the most recent addition to the clinician's armamentarium against these fluctuations.Materials and methods: We review the development of COMT inhibitors in the treatment of PD as well as the efficacy and safety data reported in the currently published literature of opicapone in PD. The "currently published literature" is defined as all published, PubMed indexed trials including the word "opicapone." Finally, we compare opicapone to the competitor pharmaceuticals on the market to treat symptom fluctuations in PD and share our opinion of opicapone's place in clinical practice.Results: From the reported results of phase 3 and 4 trials of opicapone in PD, it is a safe and efficacious option to combat motor fluctuations for our PD patients taking levodopa. A reduction of "off" time by up to 1 h per day can be expected, increasing "on" time with fewer dyskinesias. Opicapone is not generally hepatotoxic, and the most reported side-effects-dyskinesia, dry mouth, dizziness, diarrhea, and constipation-were seen in only 1.4% of the OPTIPARK (a large phase 4 clinical trial) study population.Conclusions: One should consider utilizing opicapone, perhaps in combination with other augmenting medications with different mechanisms of action, to help treat motor and non-motor fluctuations in PD.

Clinical Utility of Opicapone in the Management of Parkinson's Disease: A Short Review on Emerging Data and Place in Therapy

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder, and levodopa (L-dopa) remains the most efficacious drug treatment for PD and a gold-standard for symptom control. Nonetheless, a significant majority of PD patients develop motor fluctuations over their disease course, with a significant impact on quality-of-life, meaning control of such complications translates into a fundamental clinical need. Catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors (COMT-i) are used as first-line adjuvant therapy to L-dopa for end-of-dose (EoD) motor fluctuations, since they increase L-dopa availability in the brain by inhibiting its peripheral metabolism. Opicapone (OPC), a once-daily, long-acting COMT-i, is the most recent and potent of its class, having been licensed in Europe in 2016 as an add-on to preparations of L-dopa/DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors in PD patients with EoD motor fluctuations. More recently, it has also received approval in the USA and Japan in 2020. Two high-quality positive efficacy studies (double-blind Phase III clinical trials) established OPC efficacy with significant reduction in OFF time (average 60 minutes vs placebo), without concomitant increase of distressing dyskinesias during ON time. These beneficial effects were sustained in open-label extension studies, without unexpected safety issues or adverse events, with dyskinesia having been the most frequent complaint. OPC also avoids liver toxicity and gastrointestinal issues compared with previous COMT-i. In this review, we aimed to cover OPC’s lifecycle (synthesis to commercialization), its clinical pharmacological data, safety, tolerability and pharmacovigilance evidence, and discuss its role in the management of motor fluctuations in PD as well as its emerging place in international recommendations.

Opicapone: A Review in Parkinson's Disease

Oral opicapone (Ongentys^®), a potent third-generation, peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, is approved as adjunctive therapy to preparations of levodopa/dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (L-dopa/DDCI) in adults with Parkinson's disease (PD) and end-of dose (EoD) motor fluctuations. In pivotal global trials (BIPARK 1 and BIPARK 2; 14-15 weeks' duration), open-label extensions (OLEs) of BIPARK, and in the real-world setting (OPTIPARK; 3-6 months), opicapone 50 mg once daily was an effective and generally well tolerated adjunctive therapy to L-dopa/DDCI plus other PD therapy in adults with PD and EoD motor fluctuations. Adjunctive opicapone provided better efficacy than placebo for improvements in ON- and OFF-state time and fulfilled noninferiority to adjunctive entacapone for improvements in OFF time in BIPARK 1. These beneficial effects of adjunctive opicapone on motor fluctuations were maintained during 1 year of treatment in OLE studies. Given its efficacy and safety profile, adjunctive opicapone remains an important option in the management of adults with PD and EoD motor fluctuations who cannot be stabilized on preparations of L-dopa/DDCI.

Opicapone Efficacy and Tolerability in Parkinson's Disease Patients Reporting Insufficient Benefit/Failure of Entacapone

BACKGROUND

Opicapone, a recently introduced catechol-o-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitor has the advantage of being administered once daily, and has pharmacokinetic data to indicate it offers a greater degree of COMT inhibition than entacapone. Although trial data indicate it is non-inferior to entacapone, there are no data to indicate whether it offers any clinical advantages.

METHODS

In this audit, we present data from 57 individuals prescribed opicapone at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square who had either not tolerated or reported insufficient benefit following previous prescription of entacapone.

RESULTS

A total of 20 of 57 patients switched directly from entacapone to opicapone ("entacapone switchers") whereas 37 of 57 patients had previously discontinued entacapone because of lack of benefit or adverse events ("entacapone failures"). A total of 21 of 57 (37%) patients stopped opicapone prior to 6 months. A total of 7 of 20 (35%) "entacapone switchers" experienced adverse events with opicapone of which 5 stopped the drug prior to the 6 month evaluation of efficacy. A total of 23 of 37 (62%) "entacapone failures" reported adverse events of which 16 stopped the drug. Among 36 of 57 (63%) patients who continued to use opicapone at 6 months, there was an improvement in OFF time of ~2 hours per day as measured by interview.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that opicapone can be an effective additional treatment for wearing off in Parkinson's disease (PD) in a subgroup of patients. The use of opicapone in our cohort with prior entacapone exposure, however, was associated with higher rates of adverse effects and treatment discontinuation than reported in published trial data of COMT inhibitor naïve patients.

Randomized, Controlled Study of Opicapone in Japanese Parkinson's Patients with Motor Fluctuations

Objectives

This placebo‐controlled, randomized study evaluated the efficacy and safety of opicapone 25‐mg and 50‐mg tablets in Japanese levodopa‐treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations.

Methods

Japanese adults (n = 437, age 39–83 years) with Parkinson's disease (United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society criteria) received opicapone 25‐mg (n = 145), opicapone 50‐mg (n = 145), or placebo (n = 147) tablets over the double‐blind treatment period (14–15 weeks). The primary efficacy assessment was change in OFF‐time; secondary efficacy assessments included OFF/ON‐time responders (≥1 hour change from baseline), total ON‐time, ON‐time with and without troublesome dyskinesia, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.

Results

The least squares mean (standard error) change in OFF‐time from baseline to the last visit was −0.42 (0.21) hour for the placebo group, −1.16 (0.22) hour for the opicapone 25 mg group, and −1.04 (0.21) hour for the opicapone 50 mg group. The percentage of ON‐time responders, changes in total ON‐time/ON‐time without troublesome dyskinesia, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale II (at OFF) all showed statistically significant improvements versus placebo for both opicapone tablet doses (P < 0.05). Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III (at ON) was improved versus placebo in patients who received opicapone 50 mg (P < 0.05). Adverse events were more common in patients treated with opicapone 25 mg (60.0%) or opicapone 50 mg (54.5%) versus placebo (48.3%). The most commonly reported adverse event was dyskinesia (placebo, 2.7%; opicapone 25 mg, 9.0%; opicapone 50 mg, 12.4%).

Conclusions

In Japanese patients, both opicapone 25 and 50 mg were significantly more effective than placebo with no dose‐dependent difference in efficacy, and both doses were well tolerated. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Non-Dopaminergic Treatments for Motor Control in Parkinson's Disease: An Update

Glutamatergic, noradrenergic, serotonergic, and cholinergic systems play a critical role in the basal ganglia circuitry. Targeting these non-dopaminergic receptors remains a focus of ongoing research to improve Parkinson's disease (PD) motor symptoms, without the potential side effects of dopamine replacement therapy. This review updates advancements in non-dopaminergic treatments for motor control in PD since 2013. To date, no non-dopaminergic selective drug has shown significant long-term efficacy as monotherapy in PD. The largest area of development in non-dopaminergic targets has been for motor complications of dopamine replacement therapy (motor fluctuations and dyskinesia). For treatment of motor fluctuations, safinamide, zonisamide, and istradefylline are currently approved, and novel glutamatergic and serotonergic drugs are in development. Long-acting formulations of amantadine are approved for treating dyskinesia. Several non-dopaminergic drugs have failed to show anti-dyskinetic efficacy, while some are still in development. Non-dopaminergic targets are also being pursued to treat specific motor symptoms of PD. For example, CX-8998 (a calcium channel modulator) is being evaluated for PD tremor and rivastigmine may improve gait dysfunction in PD. Drug repurposing continues to be a key strategy for non-dopaminergic targets in PD, but the field needs to increase discovery and availability of such drugs.

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Capsule and Tablet Formulations of Opicapone in Healthy Japanese Subjects: Phase 1 Study

Opicapone, a peripheral, long‐acting catechol‐O‐methyltransferase inhibitor has been shown to improve wearing‐off phenomenon in randomized, double‐blind studies. This study compared the pharmacokinetic characteristics of opicapone small‐tablet and size 1 capsule formulations after single oral administration to healthy Japanese subjects. In this open‐label, randomized, 2‐way and 2‐period crossover phase 1 study, 48 healthy male subjects (aged 20 to 45 years; body mass index, 18.5 to <30.0 kg/m²) were randomly assigned to 2 cohorts (n = 24 each), which were administered opicapone 25 or 50 mg in a tablet‐capsule or capsule‐tablet sequence under fasted conditions. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis before opicapone capsule/tablet administration and at regular intervals over 24 hours after administration. Compared with capsules, tablets were associated with higher C_max and AUC_last/0‐∞ values. However, t_1/2 and t_max values were similar with opicapone 25‐ and 50‐mg capsules/tablets. Geometric mean ratios (tablets/capsules) of C_max, AUC_last, and AUC_0‐∞ were 1.24, 1.18, and 1.19, respectively, for the 25‐mg dose and 1.42, 1.28, and 1.27, respectively, for the 50‐mg dose. Opicapone was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred. A small tablet formulation of opicapone proposed for use in Japanese clinical trials was associated with apparent greater exposure compared with the existing hard capsule formulation, which should be considered when developing opicapone for Japanese patients.

Effect of Opicapone Tablets on Levodopa and 3-O-Methyldopa Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Japanese Subjects: Phase 1 Study

This study evaluated the effect of a small-tablet formulation of opicapone for use in clinical trials in Japan on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa (l-dopa) and 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD). In an open-label, 3-period, single-sequence crossover phase 1 study in 80 healthy Japanese males (aged 20-45 years; body mass index, 18.5 to <30.0 kg/m² ), 10 mg of l-dopa/carbidopa 100 was administered 3 times daily on day 0 (period 1) and day 12 (period 3), and opicapone tablets (5, 10, 25, or 50 mg; n = 20 each group) were administered once daily for 11 days (period 2). During periods 1 and 3, plasma concentrations of l-dopa and 3-OMD were measured and pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum observed plasma concentration, time at which maximum concentration was observed, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 5 hours [AUC_5h ] and from time 0 to 24 hours [AUC_24h ] following each dose, terminal half-life) of plasma l-dopa and 3-OMD were determined along with the geometric mean ratio (period 3/period 1) of AUC_24h for l-dopa and 3-OMD. Maximum concentration of l-dopa for the first, second, or third doses of l-dopa/carbidopa did not significantly increase with increasing opicapone dose. The AUC of l-dopa increased with increasing opicapone dose but tended toward a peak plateau with opicapone doses of 25 mg and higher. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of AUC_24h were 5 mg, 1.16 (1.10-1.21); 10 mg, 1.26 (1.23-1.30); 25 mg, 1.51 (1.44-1.57); 50 mg, 1.60 (1.54-1.66). Opicapone tablets were well tolerated. In Japanese healthy subjects, increases in plasma exposure to l-dopa appear to level off with opicapone doses of 25 mg and higher, which may be relevant for optimal dosing among Japanese patients with Parkinson disease.

Lipid-based nanodelivery approaches for dopamine-replacement therapies in Parkinson's disease: From preclinical to translational studies

The incidence of Parkinson's disease (PD), the second most common neurodegenerative disorder, has increased exponentially as the global population continues to age. Although the etiological factors contributing to PD remain uncertain, its average incidence rate is reported to be 1% of the global population older than 60 years. PD is primarily characterized by the progressive loss of dopaminergic (DAergic) neurons and/or associated neuronal networks and the subsequent depletion of dopamine (DA) levels in the brain. Thus, DA or levodopa (l-dopa), a precursor of DA, represent cardinal targets for both idiopathic and symptomatic PD therapeutics. While several therapeutic strategies have been investigated over the past decade for their abilities to curb the progression of PD, an effective cure for PD is currently unavailable. Even DA replacement therapy, an effective PD therapeutic strategy that provides an exogenous supply of DA or l-dopa, has been hindered by severe challenges, such as a poor capacity to bypass the blood-brain barrier and inadequate bioavailability. Nevertheless, with recent advances in nanotechnology, several drug delivery systems have been developed to bypass the barriers associated with central nervous system therapeutics. In here, we sought to describe the adapted lipid-based nanodrug delivery systems used in the field of PD therapeutics and their recent advances, with a particular focus placed on DA replacement therapies. This work initially explores the background of PD; offers descriptions of the most recent molecular targets; currently available clinical medications/limitations; an overview of several lipid-based PD nanotherapeutics, functionalized nanoparticles, and technical aspects in brain delivery; and, finally, presents future perspectives to enhance the use of nanotherapeutics in PD treatment.