1
|
De Metz C, Hennart B, Aymes E, Cren P, Martignène N, Penel N, Barthoulot M, Carnot A. Complete DPYD genotyping combined with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotyping to prevent fluoropyrimidine toxicity: A retrospective study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7066. [PMID: 38523525 PMCID: PMC10961597 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In April 2019, French authorities mandated dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) screening, specifically testing uracilemia, to mitigate the risk of toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, this subject is still of debate as there is no consensus on a standardized DPD deficiency screening test. We conducted a real-life retrospective study with the aim of assessing the impact of DPD screening on the occurrence of severe toxicity and exploring the potential benefits of complete genotyping using next-generation sequencing. METHODS All adult patients consecutively treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or its oral prodrug at six cancer centers between March 2018 and February 2019 were considered for inclusion. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency screening included gene encoding DPD (DPYD) genotyping using complete genome sequencing and DPD phenotyping (uracilemia or dihydrouracilemia/uracilemia ratio) or both tests. Associations between each DPD screening method and (i) severe (grade ≥3) early toxicity and (ii) fluoropyrimidine dose reduction in the second chemotherapy cycle were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, we assessed the concordance between DPD genotype and phenotype using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS A total of 551 patients were included. Most patients were tested for DPD deficiency (86%) including DPYD genotyping only (6%), DPD phenotyping only (8%), or both (72%). Complete DPD deficiency was not detected in the study population. Severe early toxicity events were observed in 73 patients (13%), with two patients (0.30%) presenting grade 5 toxicity. Despite the numerically higher toxicity rate in untested patients, the occurrence of severe toxicity was not significantly associated with the DPD screening method (p = 0.69). Concordance between the DPD genotype and phenotype was weak (Cohen's kappa of 0.14). CONCLUSION Due to insufficient numbers, our study was not able to demonstrate any added value of DPYD genotyping using complete genome sequencing to prevent 5-FU toxicity. The optimal strategy for DPD screening before fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy requires further clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Côme De Metz
- Department of Medical OncologyCentre Oscar LambretLilleFrance
| | - Benjamin Hennart
- Toxicology Unit, Biology and Pathology CentreLille University Medical CentreLilleFrance
| | - Estelle Aymes
- Department of BiostatisticsCentre Oscar LambretLilleFrance
| | - Pierre‐Yves Cren
- Department of Medical OncologyCentre Oscar LambretLilleFrance
- Department of BiostatisticsCentre Oscar LambretLilleFrance
| | | | - Nicolas Penel
- Department of Medical OncologyCentre Oscar LambretLilleFrance
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 ‐ Metrics: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicalesLilleFrance
| | | | - Aurélien Carnot
- Department of Medical OncologyCentre Oscar LambretLilleFrance
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mondello A, Dal Bo M, Toffoli G, Polano M. Machine learning in onco-pharmacogenomics: a path to precision medicine with many challenges. Front Pharmacol 2024; 14:1260276. [PMID: 38264526 PMCID: PMC10803549 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1260276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the past two decades, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the approach to cancer research. Applications of NGS include the identification of tumor specific alterations that can influence tumor pathobiology and also impact diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic options. Pharmacogenomics (PGx) studies the role of inheritance of individual genetic patterns in drug response and has taken advantage of NGS technology as it provides access to high-throughput data that can, however, be difficult to manage. Machine learning (ML) has recently been used in the life sciences to discover hidden patterns from complex NGS data and to solve various PGx problems. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the NGS approaches that can be employed and the different PGx studies implicating the use of NGS data. We also provide an excursus of the ML algorithms that can exert a role as fundamental strategies in the PGx field to improve personalized medicine in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Maurizio Polano
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cayún JP, Cerpa LC, Colombo A, Cáceres DD, Leal JL, Reyes F, Gutiérrez-Cáceres C, Calfunao S, Varela NM, Quiñones LA. Genetic Polymorphisms and Tumoral Mutational Profiles over Survival in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients: An Exploratory Study. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:274-295. [PMID: 38248103 PMCID: PMC10814806 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31010018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a common disease, both in Chile and worldwide. The most widely used chemotherapy schemes are based on 5-fluorouracil (5FU) as the foundational drug (FOLFOX, CapeOX). Genetic polymorphisms have emerged as potential predictive biomarkers of response to chemotherapy, but conclusive evidence is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the role of genetic variants associated with 5FU-based chemotherapy on therapeutic response, considering their interaction with oncogene mutations (KRAS, NRAS, PI3KCA, AKT1, BRAF). In a retrospective cohort of 63 patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer, a multivariate analysis revealed that liver metastases, DPYD, ABCB1, and MTHFR polymorphisms are independent indicators of poor prognosis, irrespective of oncogene mutations. BRAF wild-type status and high-risk drug-metabolism polymorphisms correlated with a poor prognosis in this Chilean cohort. Additionally, findings from the genomics of drug sensitivity (GDSC) project demonstrated that cell lines with wild-type BRAF have higher IC50 values for 5-FU compared to BRAF-mutated cell lines. In conclusion, the genetic polymorphisms DPYDrs1801265, ABCB1rs1045642, and MTHFRrs180113 may serve as useful biomarkers for predicting a poor prognosis in patients undergoing 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy, regardless of oncogene mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Pablo Cayún
- Laboratory of Chemical Carcinogenesis and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Basic-Clinical Oncology (DOBC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile; (J.P.C.); (L.C.C.); (C.G.-C.); (S.C.)
- Latin American Network for Implementation and Validation of Clinical Pharmacogenomics Guidelines (RELIVAF-CYTED), Santiago 8350499, Chile
| | - Leslie Carol Cerpa
- Laboratory of Chemical Carcinogenesis and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Basic-Clinical Oncology (DOBC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile; (J.P.C.); (L.C.C.); (C.G.-C.); (S.C.)
- Latin American Network for Implementation and Validation of Clinical Pharmacogenomics Guidelines (RELIVAF-CYTED), Santiago 8350499, Chile
| | - Alicia Colombo
- Anatomy Pathology Service, Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile;
- Department of Basic-Clinical Oncology (DOBC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile
| | - Dante Daniel Cáceres
- Institute of Population Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile;
| | - José Luis Leal
- Cancer Research Department, Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago 8350499, Chile; (J.L.L.); (F.R.)
| | - Felipe Reyes
- Cancer Research Department, Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago 8350499, Chile; (J.L.L.); (F.R.)
| | - Carolina Gutiérrez-Cáceres
- Laboratory of Chemical Carcinogenesis and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Basic-Clinical Oncology (DOBC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile; (J.P.C.); (L.C.C.); (C.G.-C.); (S.C.)
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile
| | - Susan Calfunao
- Laboratory of Chemical Carcinogenesis and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Basic-Clinical Oncology (DOBC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile; (J.P.C.); (L.C.C.); (C.G.-C.); (S.C.)
- Latin American Network for Implementation and Validation of Clinical Pharmacogenomics Guidelines (RELIVAF-CYTED), Santiago 8350499, Chile
- Laboratory Pathological Anatomy, Hospital Luis Calvo Mackenna, Santiago 8350499, Chile
| | - Nelson Miguel Varela
- Laboratory of Chemical Carcinogenesis and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Basic-Clinical Oncology (DOBC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile; (J.P.C.); (L.C.C.); (C.G.-C.); (S.C.)
- Latin American Network for Implementation and Validation of Clinical Pharmacogenomics Guidelines (RELIVAF-CYTED), Santiago 8350499, Chile
| | - Luis Abel Quiñones
- Laboratory of Chemical Carcinogenesis and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Basic-Clinical Oncology (DOBC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile; (J.P.C.); (L.C.C.); (C.G.-C.); (S.C.)
- Latin American Network for Implementation and Validation of Clinical Pharmacogenomics Guidelines (RELIVAF-CYTED), Santiago 8350499, Chile
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Chile, Santiago 8350499, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fragoulakis V, Roncato R, Bignucolo A, Patrinos GP, Toffoli G, Cecchin E, Mitropoulou C. Cost-utility analysis and cross-country comparison of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment in colorectal cancer patients participating in the U-PGx PREPARE study. Pharmacol Res 2023; 197:106949. [PMID: 37802427 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A cost-utility analysis was conducted to evaluate pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided treatment compared to the standard-of-care intervention among patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) in Italy. METHODS Data derived from a prospective, open-label, block randomized clinical trial, as a part of the largest PGx study worldwide (355 patients in both arms) were used. Mortality was used as the primary health outcome to estimate life years (LYs) gained in treatment arms within a survival analysis context. PGx-guided treatment was based on established drug-gene interactions between capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan with DPYD and/or UGT1A1 genomic variants. Utility values for the calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) was based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Missing data were imputed via the Multiple Imputation method and linear interpolation, when possible, while censored cost data were corrected via the Replace-From-The-Right algorithm. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated for QALYs. Raw data were bootstrapped 5000 times in order to produce 95% Confidence Intervals based on non-parametric percentile method and to construct a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Cost differences for study groups were investigated via a generalized linear regression model analysis. Total therapy cost per patient reflected all resources expended in the management of any adverse events, including medications, diagnostics tests, devices, surgeries, the utilization of intensive care units, and wards. RESULTS The total cost of the study arm was estimated at €380 (∼ US$416; 95%CI: 195-596) compared to €565 (∼ US$655; 95%CI: 340-724) of control arm while the mean survival in study arm was estimated at 1.58 (+0.25) LYs vs 1.50 (+0.26) (Log Rank test, X2 = 4.219, df=1, p-value=0.04). No statistically significant difference was found in QALYs. ICER was estimated at €13418 (∼ US$14695) per QALY, while the acceptability curve indicated that when the willingness-to-pay was under €5000 (∼ US$5476), the probability of PGx being cost-effective overcame 70%. The most frequent adverse drug event in both groups was neutropenia of severity grade 3 and 4, accounting for 82.6% of total events in the study arm and 65.0% in the control arm. Apart from study arm, smoking status, Body-Mass-Index and Cumulative Actionability were also significant predictors of total cost. Subgroup analysis conducted in actionable patients (7.9% of total patients) indicated that PGx-guided treatment was a dominant option over its comparator with a probability greater than 92%. In addition, a critical literature review was conducted, and these findings are in line with those reported in other European countries. CONCLUSION PGx-guided treatment strategy may represent a cost-saving option compared to the existing conventional therapeutic approach for colorectal cancer patient management in the National Health Service of Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - George P Patrinos
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece; Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Zayed Center for Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Erika Cecchin
- Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), Aviano, Italy
| | - Christina Mitropoulou
- The Golden Helix Foundation, London, UK; Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ragia G, Maslarinou A, Atzemian N, Biziota E, Koukaki T, Ioannou C, Balgkouranidou I, Kolios G, Kakolyris S, Xenidis N, Amarantidis K, Manolopoulos VG. Implementing pharmacogenetic testing in fluoropyrimidine-treated cancer patients: DPYD genotyping to guide chemotherapy dosing in Greece. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1248898. [PMID: 37781702 PMCID: PMC10536177 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1248898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by DPYD gene, is the rate-limiting enzyme responsible for fluoropyrimidine (FP) catabolism. DPYD gene variants seriously affect DPD activity and are well validated predictors of FP-associated toxicity. DPYD variants rs3918290, rs55886062, rs67376798, and rs75017182 are currently included in FP genetic-based dosing guidelines and are recommended for genotyping by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) before treatment initiation. In Greece, however, no data exist on DPYD genotyping. The aim of the present study was to analyze prevalence of DPYD rs3918290, rs55886062, rs67376798, rs75017182, and, additionally, rs1801160 variants, and assess their association with FP-induced toxicity in Greek cancer patients. Methods: Study group consisted of 313 FP-treated cancer patients. DPYD genotyping was conducted on QuantStudio ™ 12K Flex Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher Scientific) using the TaqMan® assays C__30633851_20 (rs3918290), C__11985548_10 (rs55886062), C__27530948_10 (rs67376798), C_104846637_10 (rs75017182) and C__11372171_10 (rs1801160). Results: Any grade toxicity (1-4) was recorded in 208 patients (66.5%). Out of them, 25 patients (12%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. DPYD EMA recommended variants were detected in 9 patients (2.9%), all experiencing toxicity (p = 0.031, 100% specificity). This frequency was found increased in grade 3-4 toxicity cases (12%, p = 0.004, 97.9% specificity). DPYD deficiency increased the odds of grade 3-4 toxicity (OR: 6.493, p = 0.014) and of grade 1-4 gastrointestinal (OR: 13.990, p = 0.014), neurological (OR: 4.134, p = 0.040) and nutrition/metabolism (OR: 4.821, p = 0.035) toxicities. FP dose intensity was significantly reduced in DPYD deficient patients (β = -0.060, p <0.001). DPYD rs1801160 variant was not associated with FP-induced toxicity or dose intensity. Triple interaction of DPYD*TYMS*MTHFR was associated with grade 3-4 toxicity (OR: 3.725, p = 0.007). Conclusion: Our findings confirm the clinical validity of DPYD reduced function alleles as risk factors for development of FP-associated toxicity in the Greek population. Pre-treatment DPYD genotyping should be implemented in clinical practice and guide FP dosing. DPYD*gene interactions merit further investigation as to their potential to increase the prognostic value of DPYD genotyping and improve safety of FP-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Ragia
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
- Individualised Medicine and Pharmacological Research Solutions Center (IMPReS), Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Anthi Maslarinou
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
- Individualised Medicine and Pharmacological Research Solutions Center (IMPReS), Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Natalia Atzemian
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
- Individualised Medicine and Pharmacological Research Solutions Center (IMPReS), Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Eirini Biziota
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Triantafyllia Koukaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Charalampia Ioannou
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Ioanna Balgkouranidou
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - George Kolios
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
- Individualised Medicine and Pharmacological Research Solutions Center (IMPReS), Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Stylianos Kakolyris
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Xenidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Kyriakos Amarantidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Vangelis G. Manolopoulos
- Laboratory of Pharmacology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
- Individualised Medicine and Pharmacological Research Solutions Center (IMPReS), Alexandroupolis, Greece
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Academic General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| |
Collapse
|