1
|
Arsène S, Parès Y, Tixier E, Granjeon-Noriot S, Martin B, Bruezière L, Couty C, Courcelles E, Kahoul R, Pitrat J, Go N, Monteiro C, Kleine-Schultjann J, Jemai S, Pham E, Boissel JP, Kulesza A. In Silico Clinical Trials: Is It Possible? Methods Mol Biol 2024; 2716:51-99. [PMID: 37702936 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3449-3_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
Modeling and simulation (M&S), including in silico (clinical) trials, helps accelerate drug research and development and reduce costs and have coined the term "model-informed drug development (MIDD)." Data-driven, inferential approaches are now becoming increasingly complemented by emerging complex physiologically and knowledge-based disease (and drug) models, but differ in setup, bottlenecks, data requirements, and applications (also reminiscent of the different scientific communities they arose from). At the same time, and within the MIDD landscape, regulators and drug developers start to embrace in silico trials as a potential tool to refine, reduce, and ultimately replace clinical trials. Effectively, silos between the historically distinct modeling approaches start to break down. Widespread adoption of in silico trials still needs more collaboration between different stakeholders and established precedence use cases in key applications, which is currently impeded by a shattered collection of tools and practices. In order to address these key challenges, efforts to establish best practice workflows need to be undertaken and new collaborative M&S tools devised, and an attempt to provide a coherent set of solutions is provided in this chapter. First, a dedicated workflow for in silico clinical trial (development) life cycle is provided, which takes up general ideas from the systems biology and quantitative systems pharmacology space and which implements specific steps toward regulatory qualification. Then, key characteristics of an in silico trial software platform implementation are given on the example of jinkō.ai (nova's end-to-end in silico clinical trial platform). Considering these enabling scientific and technological advances, future applications of in silico trials to refine, reduce, and replace clinical research are indicated, ranging from synthetic control strategies and digital twins, which overall shows promise to begin a new era of more efficient drug development.
Collapse
|
2
|
Arsène S, Couty C, Faddeenkov I, Go N, Granjeon-Noriot S, Šmít D, Kahoul R, Illigens B, Boissel JP, Chevalier A, Lehr L, Pasquali C, Kulesza A. Modeling the disruption of respiratory disease clinical trials by non-pharmaceutical COVID-19 interventions. Nat Commun 2022; 13:1980. [PMID: 35418135 PMCID: PMC9008035 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29534-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Respiratory disease trials are profoundly affected by non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) against COVID-19 because they perturb existing regular patterns of all seasonal viral epidemics. To address trial design with such uncertainty, we developed an epidemiological model of respiratory tract infection (RTI) coupled to a mechanistic description of viral RTI episodes. We explored the impact of reduced viral transmission (mimicking NPIs) using a virtual population and in silico trials for the bacterial lysate OM-85 as prophylaxis for RTI. Ratio-based efficacy metrics are only impacted under strict lockdown whereas absolute benefit already is with intermediate NPIs (eg. mask-wearing). Consequently, despite NPI, trials may meet their relative efficacy endpoints (provided recruitment hurdles can be overcome) but are difficult to assess with respect to clinical relevance. These results advocate to report a variety of metrics for benefit assessment, to use adaptive trial design and adapted statistical analyses. They also question eligibility criteria misaligned with the actual disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ben Illigens
- Novadiscovery SA, Lyon, France
- Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
High Risk versus Proportional Benefit: Modelling Equitable Strategies in Cardiovascular Prevention. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0140793. [PMID: 26529507 PMCID: PMC4631497 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2014] [Accepted: 09/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the performances of an alternative strategy to decide initiating BP-lowering drugs called Proportional Benefit (PB). It selects candidates addressing the inequity induced by the high-risk approach since it distributes the gains proportionally to the burden of disease by genders and ages. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Mild hypertensives from a Realistic Virtual Population by genders and 10-year age classes (range 35-64 years) received simulated treatment over 10 years according to the PB strategy or the 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines (ESH/ESC). Primary outcomes were the relative life-year gain (life-years gained-to-years of potential life lost ratio) and the number needed to treat to gain a life-year. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of changes introduced by the ESH/ESC guidelines appeared in 2013 on these outcomes. RESULTS The 2007 ESH/ESC relative life-year gains by ages were 2%; 10%; 14% in men, and 0%; 2%; 11% in women, this gradient being abolished by the PB (relative gain in all categories = 10%), while preserving the same overall gain in life-years. The redistribution of benefits improved the profile of residual events in younger individuals compared to the 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines. The PB strategy was more efficient (NNT = 131) than the 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines, whatever the level of evidence of the scenario adopted (NNT = 139 and NNT = 179 with the evidence-based scenario and the opinion-based scenario, respectively), although the 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines remained the most efficient strategy (NNT = 114). CONCLUSION The Proportional Benefit strategy provides the first response ever proposed against the inequity of resource use when treating highest risk people. It occupies an intermediate position with regards to the efficiency expected from the application of historical and current ESH/ESC hypertension guidelines. Our approach allows adapting recommendations to the risk and resources of a particular country.
Collapse
|
4
|
Boissel JP, Auffray C, Noble D, Hood L, Boissel FH. Bridging Systems Medicine and Patient Needs. CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY 2015. [PMID: 26225243 PMCID: PMC4394618 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
While there is widespread consensus on the need both to change the prevailing research and development (R&D) paradigm and provide the community with an efficient way to personalize medicine, ecosystem stakeholders grapple with divergent conceptions about which quantitative approach should be preferred. The primary purpose of this position paper is to contrast these approaches. The second objective is to introduce a framework to bridge simulation outputs and patient outcomes, thus empowering the implementation of systems medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C Auffray
- European Institute for Systems Biology & Medicine, CNRS-UCBL-ENS, Université de Lyon France
| | - D Noble
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy & Genetics, University of Oxford Oxford, UK
| | - L Hood
- Institute for Systems Biology Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kahoul R, Gueyffier F, Amsallem E, Haugh M, Marchant I, Boissel FH, Boissel JP. Comparison of an effect-model-law-based method versus traditional clinical practice guidelines for optimal treatment decision-making: application to statin treatment in the French population. J R Soc Interface 2014; 11:20140867. [PMID: 25209407 PMCID: PMC4191119 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2014] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthcare authorities make difficult decisions about how to spend limited budgets for interventions that guarantee the best cost-efficacy ratio. We propose a novel approach for treatment decision-making, OMES-in French: Objectif thérapeutique Modèle Effet Seuil (in English: Therapeutic Objective-Threshold-Effect Model; TOTEM). This approach takes into consideration results from clinical trials, adjusted for the patients' characteristics in treatment decision-making. We compared OMES with the French clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of dyslipidemia with statin in a computer-generated realistic virtual population, representing the adult French population, in terms of the number of all-cause deaths avoided (number of avoided events: NAEs) under treatment and the individual absolute benefit. The total budget was fixed at the annual amount reimbursed by the French social security for statins. With the CPGs, the NAEs was 292 for an annual cost of 122.54 M€ compared with 443 with OMES. For a fixed NAEs, OMES reduced costs by 50% (60.53 M€ yr(-1)). The results demonstrate that OMES is at least as good as, and even better than, the standard CPGs when applied to the same population. Hence the OMES approach is a practical, useful alternative which will help to overcome the limitations of treatment decision-making based uniquely on CPGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riad Kahoul
- Novadiscovery SAS, 60 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, CNRS, UCB Lyon 1 - Bât. Grégor Mendel, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France
| | - François Gueyffier
- UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, CNRS, UCB Lyon 1 - Bât. Grégor Mendel, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Essais Thérapeutiques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Faculté de Médecine Laennec, Rue Guillaume Paradin, BP8071, 69376 Lyon cedex 08, France
| | | | - Margaret Haugh
- Novadiscovery SAS, 60 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Ivanny Marchant
- Departamento de Pre-clínicas, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad de Valparaíso, Errázuriz 1834, Valparaíso, Quinta Región de Valparaíso, Chile
| | | | - Jean-Pierre Boissel
- Novadiscovery SAS, 60 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008 Lyon, France UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, CNRS, UCB Lyon 1 - Bât. Grégor Mendel, 43 bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et Essais Thérapeutiques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Faculté de Médecine Laennec, Rue Guillaume Paradin, BP8071, 69376 Lyon cedex 08, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Massol J, Boissel JP. Better Defining Target Populations for Drugs with a View to Reimbursement. Therapie 2014; 69:235-7. [DOI: 10.2515/therapie/2014027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2013] [Accepted: 02/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
7
|
|
8
|
Erpeldinger S, Fayolle L, Boussageon R, Flori M, Lainé X, Moreau A, Gueyffier F. Is there excess mortality in women screened with mammography: a meta-analysis of non-breast cancer mortality. Trials 2013; 14:368. [PMID: 24192052 PMCID: PMC4228242 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2013] [Accepted: 10/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The objective of our meta-analysis and systematic review was to analyze non-breast cancer mortality in women screened with mammography versus non-screened women to determine whether there is excess mortality caused by screening. Methods We searched PubMed and the Web of Science up to 30 November 2010. We included randomized controlled trials with non-breast cancer mortality as the main endpoint. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Results There was no significant difference between groups at 13-year follow-up (odds ratio = 1.00 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.03) with average heterogeneity I2 = 61%) regardless of the age and the methodological quality of the included studies. The meta-analysis did not reveal excess non-breast cancer mortality caused by screening. If screening does have an effect on excess mortality, it is possible to provide an estimate of its maximum value through the upper confidence interval in good-quality methodological studies: up to 3% in the screened women group (12 deaths per 100,000 women). Conclusions The all-cause death rate was not significantly reduced by screening when compared to the rate observed in unscreened women. However, mammography screening does not seem to induce excess mortality. These findings improve information given to patients. Finding more comprehensive data is now going to be difficult given the complexity of the studies. Individual modeling should be used because the studies fail to include all the aspects of a complex situation. The risk/benefit analysis of screening needs to be regularly and independently reassessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Erpeldinger
- Department of General Medicine, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, 69000, Lyon, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Are we using blood pressure-lowering drugs appropriately? Perhaps now is the time for a change. J Hum Hypertens 2013; 28:68-70. [PMID: 23985878 DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2013.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
This topic seems particularly appropriate since this year is the 20th Anniversary of the Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane Collaboration and the Hypertension Review Group have played a leading role in advancing the evidence-based agenda that has challenged many of our ways of thinking and approaches to treating patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Boissel JP, Kahoul R, Marin D, Boissel FH. Effect model law: an approach for the implementation of personalized medicine. J Pers Med 2013; 3:177-90. [PMID: 25562651 PMCID: PMC4251395 DOI: 10.3390/jpm3030177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2013] [Revised: 07/31/2013] [Accepted: 08/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The effect model law states that a natural relationship exists between the frequency (observation) or the probability (prediction) of a morbid event without any treatment and the frequency or probability of the same event with a treatment. This relationship is called the effect model. It applies to a single individual, individuals within a population, or groups. In the latter case, frequencies or probabilities are averages of the group. The relationship is specific to a therapy, a disease or an event, and a period of observation. If one single disease is expressed through several distinct events, a treatment will be characterized by as many effect models. Empirical evidence, simulations with models of diseases and therapies and virtual populations, as well as theoretical derivation support the existence of the law. The effect model could be estimated through statistical fitting or mathematical modelling. It enables the prediction of the (absolute) benefit of a treatment for a given patient. It thus constitutes the theoretical basis for the design of practical tools for personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Riad Kahoul
- Novadiscovery SAS, 60 Avenue Rockefeller, Lyon 69008, France.
| | - Draltan Marin
- Novadiscovery SAS, 60 Avenue Rockefeller, Lyon 69008, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fiuzat M, O’Connor CM, Gueyffier F, Mascette AM, Geller NL, Mebazaa A, Voors AA, Adams KF, Piña IL, Neyses L, Muntendam P, Felker GM, Pitt B, Zannad F, Bristow MR. Biomarker-Guided Therapies in Heart Failure: A Forum for Unified Strategies. J Card Fail 2013; 19:592-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2013] [Revised: 05/16/2013] [Accepted: 05/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
12
|
Gueyffier F, Strang CB, Berdeaux G, França LR, Blin P, Massol J. Contribution of modeling approaches and virtual populations in transposing the results of clinical trials into real life and in enlightening public health decisions. Therapie 2012; 67:367-74. [PMID: 23110837 DOI: 10.2515/therapie/2012042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2012] [Accepted: 06/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Modeling consists in aggregating separate pieces of knowledge, according to a given structure and rules. It allows studying the behavior of more or less complex systems by simulation techniques. Modeling is used in different state-of-the-art technological domains (meteorology, aeronautics). Its use has grown for the evaluation of medicines and medical devices, from conception to prescription (marketing authorization, reimbursement, price setting and re-registrations). It follows a scientific approach and is the object of good practice recommendations. Coupling models to virtual populations allows obtaining realistic results at the population level, testing diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, as well as estimating the consequences of transposing the results of clinical trials to the population. Through examples, the participants of the Round Table analyzed the contributions of the coupling of models and realistic virtual populations, and proposed guidelines for their judicious and systematic use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Gueyffier
- Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic Trials, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France & UMR5558, CNRS and Lyon 1 University, Lyon France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gueyffier F, Strang CB, Berdeaux G, França LR, Blin P, Benichou J, Massol J, Ferrante BA, Benichou J, Berdeaux G, Blin P, Borel T, Rey-Coquais C, Joubert JM, Meyer F, Muller S, Pibouleau L, Pinet M, Vidal C. Apport de la modélisation et des populations virtuelles pour transposer les résultats des essais cliniques à la vie réelle et éclairer la décision publique. Therapie 2012; 67:359-66. [DOI: 10.2515/therapie/2012041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2012] [Accepted: 06/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
14
|
Moss R, Grosse T, Marchant I, Lassau N, Gueyffier F, Thomas SR. Virtual patients and sensitivity analysis of the Guyton model of blood pressure regulation: towards individualized models of whole-body physiology. PLoS Comput Biol 2012; 8:e1002571. [PMID: 22761561 PMCID: PMC3386164 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2012] [Accepted: 05/08/2012] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Mathematical models that integrate multi-scale physiological data can offer insight into physiological and pathophysiological function, and may eventually assist in individualized predictive medicine. We present a methodology for performing systematic analyses of multi-parameter interactions in such complex, multi-scale models. Human physiology models are often based on or inspired by Arthur Guyton's whole-body circulatory regulation model. Despite the significance of this model, it has not been the subject of a systematic and comprehensive sensitivity study. Therefore, we use this model as a case study for our methodology. Our analysis of the Guyton model reveals how the multitude of model parameters combine to affect the model dynamics, and how interesting combinations of parameters may be identified. It also includes a "virtual population" from which "virtual individuals" can be chosen, on the basis of exhibiting conditions similar to those of a real-world patient. This lays the groundwork for using the Guyton model for in silico exploration of pathophysiological states and treatment strategies. The results presented here illustrate several potential uses for the entire dataset of sensitivity results and the "virtual individuals" that we have generated, which are included in the supplementary material. More generally, the presented methodology is applicable to modern, more complex multi-scale physiological models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Moss
- IR4M UMR8081 CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Thibault Grosse
- IR4M UMR8081 CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ivanny Marchant
- Escuela de Medicina, Departamento de Pre-clínicas, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
| | - Nathalie Lassau
- IR4M UMR8081 CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - François Gueyffier
- IMTh – Institute for Theoretical Medicine, Lyon, France
- Université Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Lyon, France
- INSERM, CIC 201, EPICIME, Lyon, France
- Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hop L Pradel, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - S. Randall Thomas
- IR4M UMR8081 CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|