1
|
Yeung AM, Huang J, Nguyen KT, Xu NY, Hughes LT, Agrawal BK, Ejskjaer N, Klonoff DC. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:168-192. [PMID: 36384312 PMCID: PMC10899837 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221133795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) technology has been recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). The treatment involves surgical implantation of electrodes and a power source that delivers electrical current to the spinal cord. This treatment decreases the perception of pain in many chronic pain conditions, such as PDN. The number of patients with PDN treated with SCS and the amount of data describing their outcomes is expected to increase given four factors: (1) the large number of patients with this diagnosis, (2) the poor results that have been obtained for pain relief with pharmacotherapy and noninvasive non-pharmacotherapy, (3) the results to date with investigational SCS technology, and (4) the recent FDA approval of systems that deliver this treatment. Whereas traditional SCS replaces pain with paresthesias, a new form of SCS, called high-frequency 10-kHz SCS, first used for pain in 2015, can relieve PDN pain without causing paresthesias, although not all patients experience pain relief by SCS. This article describes (1) an overview of SCS technology, (2) the use of SCS for diseases other than diabetes, (3) the use of SCS for PDN, (4) a comparison of high-frequency 10-kHz and traditional SCS for PDN, (5) other SCS technology for PDN, (6) deployment of SCS systems, (7) barriers to the use of SCS for PDN, (8) risks of SCS technology, (9) current recommendations for using SCS for PDN, and (10) future developments in SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nicole Y. Xu
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | - Lorenzo T. Hughes
- Balance Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | - Niels Ejskjaer
- Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark and Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jin MY, D'Souza RS, Abd-Elsayed AA. Efficacy of Neuromodulation Interventions for the Treatment of Sexual Dysfunction: A Systematic Review. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:1518-1534. [PMID: 35981957 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this review was to analyze the literature for the efficacy of neuromodulation interventions in treating both male and female sexual dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS Studies were identified from PubMed, Scopus, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Results were synthesized qualitatively without pooling owing to the heterogeneous nature of outcome assessments. RESULTS Overall findings from studies generally supported that neuromodulation interventions were associated with improvement in sexual function. Specific domains that improved in male patients included erectile function, desire, and satisfaction, whereas desire, arousal, orgasm, lubrication, quality of "sex life," intercourse capability, and dyspareunia improved in female patients. Male ejaculation, orgasm, and intercourse capability were the only domains that continued to decline after the use of neuromodulation interventions, although this was only reported in one study. CONCLUSION Our review suggests that there may be promise and potential utility of neuromodulation in improving sexual dysfunction; however, further research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Y Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alaa A Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu X, Fu Y, Bao M. Comparison Between the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation and of Endovascular Revascularization in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Observational Study. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:1424-1432. [PMID: 37610397 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare the effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with those of endovascular revascularization on the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 104 patients with diabetic foot ulcers who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively analyzed and classified to the SCS treatment group (n = 46) and endovascular revascularization treatment group (n = 46). The quality-of-life scores (Quality of Life Scale for Patients with Liver Cancer v2.0), visual pain analog scale score, lower limb skin temperature, lower limb arterial ultrasound results, and lower extremity electromyography results were analyzed to compare the efficacy of the two treatments for diabetic foot ulcers in the two groups before surgery and six months after surgery. RESULTS A total of 92 patients (men: 73.9%, mean age: 66.51 ± 11.67 years) completed the six-month postoperative follow-up period. The patients in the SCS treatment group had a higher quality-of-life score (25.54% vs 13.77%, p < 0.05), a larger reduction in pain scores (69.18% vs 37.21%, p < 0.05), and a larger reduction in foot temperature (18.56% vs 7.24%, p < 0.05) than those of the endovascular revascularization treatment group at six months after surgery. The degree of vasodilation in the lower limbs on color Doppler arterial ultrasound and the nerve conduction velocity were higher in the SCS treatment group than in the endovascular revascularization treatment group at six months after surgery (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION SCS was more effective than endovascular revascularization in improving quality of life, relieving pain, improving lower limb skin temperature, increasing lower limb blood flow, and improving nerve conduction in patients with diabetic foot ulcers at six months after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yu Fu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Min Bao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Armstrong DG, Grunberger G. Stimulating Results Signal a New Treatment Option for People Living With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:1387-1391. [PMID: 35770993 PMCID: PMC10563543 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221099542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a progressive condition that deprives many patients of quality of life. With limited treatment options available, successful pain management can be difficult to achieve. METHODS We reviewed results of recent data evaluating high frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS). RESULTS from the SENZA-PDN randomized clinical trial (NCT03228420), the largest such trial to date, demonstrated 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation substantially reduced PDN refractory to conventional medical management along with improvements in health-related quality-of-life measures that were sustained over 12 months. These data supported the recent U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approval for 10-kHz SCS in PDN patients and contributed to the body of evidence on SCS available to health care professionals managing the effects of PDN. CONCLUSION High frequency spinal cord simulation appears to hold promise in treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. We look forward to future works in the literature that will further elucidate these promising findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G. Armstrong
- Department of Surgery, Southwestern Academic Limb Salvage Alliance, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - George Grunberger
- Grunberger Diabetes Institute, Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA
- Internal Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Burkey AR, Chen J, Argoff CE, Edgar DR, Petersen EA. Painful Peripheral Neuropathies of the Lower Limbs and/or Lower Extremities Treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis. J Pain Res 2023; 16:1607-1636. [PMID: 37229154 PMCID: PMC10202826 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s403715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Painful peripheral neuropathy (PPN) is a debilitating condition with varied etiologies. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly used when conservative treatments fail to provide adequate pain relief. Few published reviews have examined SCS outcomes in all forms of PPN. Methods We conducted a systematic review of SCS in PPN. The PubMed database was searched up to February 7th, 2022, for peer-reviewed studies of SCS that enrolled PPN patients with pain symptoms in their lower limbs and/or lower extremities. We assessed the quality of randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were tabulated and presented narratively. Results Twenty eligible studies documented SCS treatment in PPN patients, including 10 kHz SCS, traditional low-frequency SCS (t-SCS), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), and burst SCS. In total, 451 patients received a permanent implant (10 kHz SCS, n=267; t-SCS, n=147; DRGS, n=25; burst SCS, n=12). Approximately 88% of implanted patients had painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Overall, we found clinically meaningful pain relief (≥30%) with all SCS modalities. Among the studies, RCTs supported the use of 10 kHz SCS and t-SCS to treat PDN, with 10 kHz SCS providing a higher reduction in pain (76%) than t-SCS (38-55%). Pain relief with 10 kHz SCS and DRGS in other PPN etiologies ranged from 42-81%. In addition, 66-71% of PDN patients and 38% of nondiabetic PPN patients experienced neurological improvement with 10 kHz SCS. Conclusion Our review found clinically meaningful pain relief in PPN patients after SCS treatment. RCT evidence supported the use of 10 kHz SCS and t-SCS in the diabetic neuropathy subpopulation, with more robust pain relief evident with 10 kHz SCS. Outcomes in other PPN etiologies were also promising for 10 kHz SCS. In addition, a majority of PDN patients experienced neurological improvement with 10 kHz SCS, as did a notable subset of nondiabetic PPN patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey Chen
- UCSD Department of Anesthesiology Center for Pain, University of California San Diego Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Erika A Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hagedorn JM, Tate J, Bharara M. Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Using a Rechargeable 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Device. J Pain Res 2023; 16:47-53. [PMID: 36636269 PMCID: PMC9829980 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s374499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chronic pain is a common clinical condition and is frequently treated with a variety of medications, but pharmacotherapy is oftentimes not the optimal long-term treatment option. Safe and effective long-term pain relief for trunk and limb pain is available using high-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz (10 kHz SCS), which is delivered using a rechargeable implantable pulse generator (IPG). Although rechargeable devices have been shown to reduce patient risk and overall cost by eliminating the need for periodic surgeries to replace depleted non-rechargeable IPGs, there is little published evidence that rechargeable technology is practical and convenient for patients, especially in the context of 10 kHz SCS. Objective This analysis of real-world patients implanted with 10 kHz SCS devices was undertaken using patient data from an industry-maintained database to investigate whether there was a substantial burden associated with rechargeable SCS and the degree of patient satisfaction or dissatisfaction with 10 kHz SCS. Results This study included 10,391 men and women who were implanted with 10 kHz SCS devices to treat chronic pain of the trunk and/or limbs. They received stimulation for a median of 361 days (180-1550 days), and 65.48% had previous spine surgery. In this patient sample, most patients were satisfied with the efficacy of 10 kHz SCS, including 77% who would repeat the procedure and 71% who would recommend it to other patients with similar pain. In regards to IPG recharging, 70% were satisfied or very satisfied and 19% were neutral, and a majority of patients recharged their device daily for 30 to 60 minutes. Conclusion These results indicate most patients do not find IPG recharging inconvenient or burdensome. In addition, IPG recharging is not a barrier to the majority of patients benefitting from 10 kHz SCS for long-term pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Hagedorn
- iSpine Pain Physicians, Maple Grove, MN, USA,Correspondence: Jonathan M Hagedorn, iSpine Pain Physicians, Maple Grove, MN, USA, Tel +1 763-201-8191, Fax +1 763-201-8192, Email
| | | | - Manish Bharara
- Clinical Affairs Department, Nevro Corp, Redwood City, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoelzer BC, Edgar D, Lu SP, Taylor RS. Indirect Comparison of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) versus Traditional Low-Frequency SCS for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102630. [PMID: 36289892 PMCID: PMC9599433 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly used to treat painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). At the time of a recent meta-analysis in this field, data were only available from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). However, outcomes from high-frequency 10 kHz SCS treatment are now available. Our study aimed to systematically review the contemporary evidence for SCS in patients with lower limb pain due to PDN and include an indirect comparison of the high- and low-frequency modalities. We searched the PubMed/CENTRAL databases up to 18 August 2022, for peer-reviewed RCTs of SCS that enrolled PDN patients with lower limb pain symptoms. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Using SCS treatment arm data from the RCTs, we indirectly compared the absolute treatment effect of 10 kHz SCS and LF-SCS. Results are presented in tables and forest plots. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Three RCTs met our eligibility criteria, including the recent 10 kHz SCS RCT (N = 216, 90 implanted) and 2 others that examined LF-SCS (N = 36, 17 implanted; N = 60, 37 implanted). Our analysis of 6-month data found clinically meaningful pain relief with each SCS modality. However, significantly greater pain reduction was identified for 10 kHz SCS over LF-SCS: average pain reduction in the 10 kHz SCS cohort was 73.7% compared with 47.5% in the pooled LF-SCS group (p < 0.0001). In the permanent implant subset, the 50% pain reduction responder rate was 83.3% in the 10 kHz SCS cohort versus 63.0% in the pooled LF-SCS group (p = 0.0072). The overall risk of bias of each included RCT was deemed high, mainly due to the absence of patient blinding. Our analysis indicates that paresthesia-free 10 kHz SCS can provide superior pain relief and responder rate over LF-SCS for managing PDN patients refractory to conventional medical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan C. Hoelzer
- Medical Director, Southwest Spine and Pain Center, Provo, UT 84059, USA
| | | | | | - Rod S. Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health and Well Being, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
- Health Service Research, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK
- National Institute of Public Health, University of South Denmark, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Petersen EA, Stauss TG, Scowcroft JA, Brooks ES, White JL, Sills SM, Amirdelfan K, Guirguis MN, Xu J, Yu C, Nairizi A, Patterson DG, Tsoulfas KC, Creamer MJ, Galan V, Bundschu RH, Mehta ND, Sayed D, Lad SP, DiBenedetto DJ, Sethi KA, Goree JH, Bennett MT, Harrison NJ, Israel AF, Chang P, Wu PW, Argoff CE, Nasr CE, Taylor RS, Caraway DL, Mekhail NA. High-Frequency 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Refractory Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: 12-Month Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2022; 6:347-360. [PMID: 35814185 PMCID: PMC9256824 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate high-frequency (10-kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) treatment in refractory painful diabetic neuropathy. Patients and Methods A prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted between Aug 28, 2017 and March 16, 2021, comparing conventional medical management (CMM) with 10-kHz SCS+CMM. The participants had hemoglobin A1c level of less than or equal to 10% and pain greater than or equal to 5 of 10 cm on visual analog scale, with painful diabetic neuropathy symptoms 12 months or more refractory to gabapentinoids and at least 1 other analgesic class. Assessments included measures of pain, neurologic function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over 12 months with optional crossover at 6 months. Results The participants were randomized 1:1 to CMM (n=103) or 10-kHz SCS+CMM (n=113). At 6 months, 77 of 95 (81%) CMM group participants opted for crossover, whereas none of the 10-kHz SCS group participants did so. At 12 months, the mean pain relief from baseline among participants implanted with 10-kHz SCS was 74.3% (95% CI, 70.1-78.5), and 121 of 142 (85%) participants were treatment responders (≥50% pain relief). Treatment with 10-kHz SCS improved HRQoL, including a mean improvement in the EuroQol 5-dimensional questionnaire index score of 0.136 (95% CI, 0.104-0.169). The participants also reported significantly less pain interference with sleep, mood, and daily activities. At 12 months, 131 of 142 (92%) participants were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the 10-kHz SCS treatment. Conclusion The 10-kHz SCS treatment resulted in substantial pain relief and improvement in overall HRQoL 2.5- to 4.5-fold higher than the minimal clinically important difference. The outcomes were durable over 12 months and support 10-kHz SCS treatment in patients with refractory painful diabetic neuropathy. Trial registration clincaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03228420.
Collapse
Key Words
- CMM, conventional medical management
- DN4, Douleur Neuropathique
- DSPN, diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy
- EQ-5D-5L, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire
- HRQoL, health-related quality of life
- HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c
- IPG, implantable pulse generator
- NNT, number needed to treat
- PDN, painful diabetic neuropathy
- RCT, randomized controlled trial
- SCS, spinal cord stimulation
- VAS, visual analog scale
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika A. Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock,Correspondence: Address to Erika A. Petersen, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jijun Xu
- Department of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Cong Yu
- Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Neel D. Mehta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | | | | | - Khalid A. Sethi
- Department of Neurosurgery, United Health Services, Johnson City, NY
| | - Johnathan H. Goree
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul W. Wu
- Holy Cross Hospital, Fort Lauderdale, FL
| | | | - Christian E. Nasr
- Department of Endocrinology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Rod S. Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Nagy A. Mekhail
- Department of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
D'Souza RS, Barman R, Joseph A, Abd-Elsayed A. Evidence-Based Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Systematic Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:583-594. [PMID: 35716275 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01061-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) manifests with pain typically in the distal lower extremities and can be challenging to treat. The authors appraised the literature for evidence on conservative, pharmacological, and neuromodulation treatment options for PDN. RECENT FINDINGS Intensive glycemic control with insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes may be associated with lower odds of distal symmetric polyneuropathy compared to patients who receive conventional insulin therapy. First-line pharmacologic therapy for PDN includes gabapentinoids (pregabalin and gabapentin) and duloxetine. Additional pharmacologic modalities that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but are considered second-line agents include tapentadol and 8% capsaicin patch, although studies have revealed modest treatment effects from these modalities. There is level I evidence on the use of dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for treatment of PDN, delivering either a 10-kHz waveform or tonic waveform. In summary, this review provides an overview of treatment options for PDN. Furthermore, it provides updates on the level of evidence for SCS therapy in cases of PDN refractory to conventional medical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ross Barman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amira Joseph
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Strand N, Wie C, Peck J, Maita M, Singh N, Dumbroff J, Tieppo Francio V, Murphy M, Chang K, Dickerson DM, Maloney J. Small Fiber Neuropathy. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:429-438. [PMID: 35384587 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01044-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review aims to summarize advances in the field of small fiber neuropathy made over the last decade, with emphasis on novel research highlighting the distinctive features of SFN. RECENT FINDINGS While the management of SFNs is ideally aimed at treating the underlying cause, most patients will require pain control via multiple, concurrent therapies. Herein, we highlight the most up-to-date information for diagnosis, medication management, interventional management, and novel therapies on the horizon. Despite the prevalence of small fiber neuropathies, there is no clear consensus on guidelines specific for the treatment of SFN. Despite the lack of specific guidelines for SFN treatment, the most recent general neuropathic pain guidelines are based on Cochrane studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which have individually examined therapies used for the more commonly studied SFNs, such as painful diabetic neuropathy and HIV neuropathy. The recommendations from current guidelines are based on variables such as number needed to treat (NNT), safety, ease of use, and effect on quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Strand
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - C Wie
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - J Peck
- Performing Arts Medicine Department, Shenandoah University, Winchester, USA
| | - M Maita
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - N Singh
- OrthoAlabama Spine and Sports, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - J Dumbroff
- Mount Sinai Morningside and West Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA
| | - V Tieppo Francio
- Department of Rehabilitation on Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - M Murphy
- Department of Rehabilitation on Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - K Chang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - D M Dickerson
- NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago,, IL, USA
| | - J Maloney
- Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Strand NH, Burkey AR. Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Review of Evidence for Spinal Cord Stimulation. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:332-340. [PMID: 34842478 PMCID: PMC8861784 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211060075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuropathies, the most common complication of diabetes, manifest in various forms, including entrapments, mononeuropathies or, most frequently, a distal symmetric polyneuropathy. Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) in the classic "stocking" distribution is a disease of increasing prevalence worldwide and a condition for which standard medical treatment only provides modest relief. Neuromodulation offers a potential alternative to pharmacotherapies given its demonstrated efficacy in other refractory chronic neuropathic pain syndromes. High-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is available in these other settings for two approaches to spinal cord stimulation (SCS): (1) conventional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS), which modulates axonal activity in the dorsal column and is paresthesia-dependent, and (2) high-frequency SCS delivered at 10 kilohertz (10 kHz SCS), which targets neurons in the superficial dorsal horn and is paresthesia-independent. METHOD This review examines the evidence for SCS from published RCTs as well as prospective studies exploring the safety and effectiveness of treating PDN with neuromodulation. RESULTS Two RCTs enrolling 60 and 36 participants with PDN showed treatment with LF-SCS reduced daytime pain by 45% to 55% for up to two years. An RCT testing 10 kHz SCS versus conventional medical management (CMM) in 216 participants with PDN revealed 76% mean pain relief after six months of stimulation. None of the studies revealed unexpected safety issues in the use of neuromodulation in this patient population. CONCLUSION These well-designed RCTs address the unmet need for improved PDN therapies and provide data on the safety, effectiveness, and durability of SCS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie H. Strand
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department
of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Natalie H. Strand, MD, Division of Pain
Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd,
Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Adam R. Burkey
- Chair of Pain Section, American Academy
of Neurology, Minneapolis, MI, USA
- Anesis Spine & Pain Care, Renton,
WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
D'Souza RS, Langford B, Dombovy-Johnson M, Abd-Elsayed A. Neuromodulation Interventions for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Systematic Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26:365-377. [PMID: 35226258 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-022-01035-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a prevalent and debilitating condition, characterized by severe burning, tingling, and lancinating pain usually located in the distal lower extremities. In addition to manifesting with severe pain, PDN may also be associated with poor quality of life and sleep, mood disorders, burns, falls, and social withdrawal. The authors appraised the current body of literature for evidence on neuromodulation interventions for PDN. RECENT FINDINGS In patients with refractory PDN unresponsive to conventional medical management (glucose optimization and oral analgesic medications), there is level I evidence supporting the use of 10-kHz and tonic dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Included studies reported significant associations between 10-kHz and tonic dorsal column SCS and superior analgesic outcomes, physical functioning, and patient satisfaction. Current level of evidence remains limited for other modalities of neuromodulation for PDN including burst SCS (level II-3), dorsal root ganglion SCS (level III), and peripheral nerve stimulation (level II-3). Some studies reported improvements in neurological physical examination, sensory testing, and/or reflex testing in patients undergoing 10-kHz SCS for treatment of PDN. In summary, the purpose of this review is to equip provider with important updates on the use of neuromodulation interventions for the treatment of PDN that is refractory to conventional medical therapy, with current level I evidence supporting use of 10-kHz and tonic SCS for PDN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brendan Langford
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xu L, Sun Z, Casserly E, Nasr C, Cheng J, Xu J. Advances in Interventional Therapies for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review. Anesth Analg 2022; 134:1215-1228. [PMID: 35051958 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is one of the major complications of diabetes mellitus. It is often debilitating and refractory to pharmaceutical therapies. Our goal was to systematically review and evaluate the strength of evidence of interventional management options for PDN and make evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. METHODS We searched PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Llibrary and systematically reviewed all types of clinical studies on interventional management modalities for PDN. RESULTS We identified and analyzed 10 relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 8 systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and 5 observational studies of interventional modalities for PDN using pain as primary outcome. We assessed the risk of bias in grading of evidence and found that there is moderate to strong evidence to support the use of dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in treating PDN in the lower extremities (evidence level: 1B+), while studies investigating its efficacy in the upper extremities are lacking. Evidence exists that acupuncture and injection of botulinum toxin-A provide relief in pain or muscle cramps due to PDN with minimal side effects (2B+/1B+). Similar level of evidence supports surgical decompression of lower limb peripheral nerves in patients with intractable PDN and superimposed nerve compression (2B±/1B+). Evidence for sympathetic blocks or neurolysis and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is limited to case series (2C+). CONCLUSIONS Moderate to strong evidence exists to support the use of SCS in managing lower extremity pain in patients who have failed conventional medical management for PDN. Acupuncture or injection of botulinum toxin-A can be considered as an adjunctive therapy for PDN. Surgical decompression of peripheral nerves may be considered in patients with PDN superimposed with nerve compression. High-quality studies are warranted to further evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of interventional therapies for PDN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Xu
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuo Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Jianguo Cheng
- Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute.,Department of Neuroscience, Lerner Research Institute
| | - Jijun Xu
- Department of Pain Management, Anesthesiology Institute.,Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gupta M, Ray M, Ladesich N, Gupta A. Health-Care Utilization and Outcomes with 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Refractory Pain. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3675-3683. [PMID: 34880672 PMCID: PMC8648088 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s306126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain is a common condition associated with decreased quality of life and increased health-care costs. Opioid analgesics are routinely used to treat chronic pain despite limited evidence of long-term efficacy. Spinal cord stimulation at a frequency of 10 kilohertz (10kHz-SCS) has been shown to be effective for treating chronic pain. Objective This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of 10kHz-SCS on patients’ pain intensity, volume of pain interventions, and opioid intake in a real-world setting. Study Design This study was a retrospective review of patient data. Setting The study was conducted at a single, community-based clinic. Methods Outcomes including pain relief, quality of life, opioid intake, and rate of health-care usage were evaluated using data from patients who were implanted with a 10kHz-SCS device to treat chronic pain. These outcomes were then compared for the pre- and post-implant periods. Results A total of 47 patients with a mean follow-up duration of 15.6 ± 6.2 months were included in this analysis. Mean pain relief was 73 ± 22% and 89% were responders at the final follow-up visit. The rate of medical interventions fell from 3.48±3.05 per year before starting 10kHz-SCS to 0.49±1.16 per year afterward (P < 0.001). Of 30 patients with available opioid consumption data, 89% maintained or decreased their intake after implant. Conclusion Retrospective data from a single center, with minimal exclusion criteria shows clinically significant pain relief with 10kHz-SCS, accompanied by significant indirect benefits including stable or reduced opioid use and reduced interventional procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayank Gupta
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | - Mahoua Ray
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| | | | - Akshat Gupta
- Neuroscience Research Center, LLC, Overland Park, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Malinowski MN, Chopra PR, Tieppo Francio V, Budwany R, Deer TR. A narrative review and future considerations of spinal cord stimulation, dorsal root ganglion stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34:774-780. [PMID: 34608057 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In recent years, neuromodulation has experienced a renaissance. Novel waveforms and anatomic targets show potential improvements in therapy that may signify substantial benefits. New innovations in peripheral nerve stimulation and dorsal root ganglion stimulation have shown prospective evidence and sustainability of results. Sub-perception physiologic bursting, high-frequency stimulation and feedback loop mechanisms provide significant benefits over traditional tonic spinal cords stimulation (SCS) in peer reviewed investigations. We reviewed the themes associated with novel technology in the context of historical stalwart publications. RECENT FINDINGS New innovations have led to better nerve targeting, improvements in disease-based treatment, and opioid alternatives for those in chronic pain. In addition, new neural targets from both structural and cellular perspectives have changed the field of Neurostimulation. SUMMARY For many years, tonic SCS was representative of neuromodulation, but as this review examines, the progression of the field in the past decade has reshaped patient options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark N Malinowski
- OhioHealth Grant Medical Center, Ohio University Heritage COM, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- The University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Ryan Budwany
- Center for Integrative Pain Management, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown
| | - Timothy Ray Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of The Virginias
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, WVU School of Medicine
- American Society of Pain and Neuroscience, Charleston, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Henson JV, Varhabhatla NC, Bebic Z, Kaye AD, Yong RJ, Urman RD, Merkow JS. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review. Pain Ther 2021; 10:895-908. [PMID: 34244979 PMCID: PMC8586096 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-021-00282-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Painful diabetic neuropathy is a common disease that results in significant pain and disability. Treatment options have traditionally consisted of conservative measures including topical and oral medication management as well as transcutaneous electrical stimulation units. These treatments demonstrate various degrees of efficacy, and many times initial treatments are discontinued, indicating low levels of satisfaction or poor tolerability. Spinal cord stimulation has been proposed as an alternative therapy for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy of the lower extremities. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this procedure. A literature search identified 14 prospective studies. Based on our analysis of the available evidence, there is moderate-quality evidence for the safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for painful diabetic neuropathy. However, further high-quality research, including a large-scale randomized controlled trial is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josianna V. Henson
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Narayana C. Varhabhatla
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Zvonimir Bebic
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Alan D. Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana Statement University, New Orleans, LA USA
| | - R. Jason Yong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Richard D. Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Justin S. Merkow
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lam CM, Zayed H, Sayed D. High frequency dorsal column spinal cord stimulation for management of erythromelalgia. BMJ Case Rep 2021; 14:14/8/e244758. [PMID: 34353840 PMCID: PMC8344303 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-244758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Erythromelalgia is a rare hereditary channelopathy affecting the Nav1.7 sodium channel. Patients afflicted with this condition suffer from pain in their hands and feet, with vasomotor changes including flushing and redness to the distal upper and lower extremities. Current treatment modalities for this condition include pharmacological therapies (neuropathic medications), behavioural interventions, lumbar epidural infusions with local anaesthetics and sympathetic nerve blocks. Despite these treatments, many patients may have refractory pain. In these situations, there may be a role for dorsal column spinal cord stimulation for management of their pain. Here, we present the case of a 21-year-old man with 9-year history of refractory erythromelalgia successfully treated with paresthesia-free dorsal column spinal cord stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Lam
- Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Hadi Zayed
- University of Kansas Medical Center School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Anesthesiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Luecke T, Kuhlmann H, May M, Petermann M, Libutzki B, Jäehnichen G. Spinal cord stimulation: a real-world data analysis on outcomes and differences between rechargeable and non-rechargeable implantable pulse generators. J Int Med Res 2021; 49:3000605211038457. [PMID: 34459276 PMCID: PMC8408900 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211038457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this analysis, we examined differences between rechargeable and non-rechargeable spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices in patients with pain. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal claims data analysis using a German research database comprising 5 million statutory insured patients (2012-2017). Outcomes of demographics, patient pathways, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with initial SCS were collected. RESULTS Of 150 patients in the database, 73 (49%) received a rechargeable device and 77 (51%) a non-rechargeable device. The average age was 62.5 years (51% female and 49% male patients). A significant decrease over a 3-year follow-up was observed in analgesic prescriptions (-18%), number of patient visits to a physician, and number of patients who were hospitalized. HCRU-related figures for patients with non-rechargeable neurostimulators increased in the last follow-up year whereas the group receiving rechargeable neurostimulators showed a steady decrease. CONCLUSIONS SCS seems to be an effective way for patients with chronic pain to decrease pain and improve quality of life. Rechargeable devices seem to be superior to non-rechargeable devices owing to greater longevity and were found to be associated with continuous reduction of pain diagnoses, hospitalization, physician visits, and use of pain medication in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten Luecke
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy, Franziskus Hospital Linz-Remagen, Germany
| | - Harald Kuhlmann
- Nevro Corp., Redwood City, CA, United States
- inspiring-health GmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie May
- HGC Healthcare Consultants GmbH, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Berit Libutzki
- HGC Healthcare Consultants GmbH, Duesseldorf, Germany
- University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Billet B, Hanssens K, Coster OD, Santos A, Rotte A, Minne V. High-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of focal, chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain: results from a prospective study in Belgium. Pain Manag 2021; 12:75-85. [PMID: 34289734 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a common complication of surgery. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paresthesia-free, 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a treatment for CPSP. Patients & methods: Subjects in this prospective, single-arm study had an average pain intensity of ≥5 cm on a 10-cm visual analog scale. The subjects who had pain relief of ≥50% (response) with temporary trial stimulation were permanently implanted with 10-kHz SCS and assessed for 1 year. Results: At 12 months, 94% of subjects were responders to 10-kHz SCS, and 88% had pain remission (visual analog scale ≤2.5 cm). Conclusion: The pain relief was durable in CPSP subjects and the safety profile of 10-kHz SCS was as expected. Clinical trial registration: VT005076953 (Privacy Commission of Belgium).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Billet
- Pijncentrum AZ Delta, Roeselare, 8800, Belgium
| | | | | | - Angela Santos
- Department of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, Nevro Corp., Redwood City, CA 94065, USA
| | - Anand Rotte
- Department of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, Nevro Corp., Redwood City, CA 94065, USA
| | - Veerle Minne
- Department of Clinical and Regulatory Affairs, Nevro Corp., Redwood City, CA 94065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Galan V, Scowcroft J, Chang P, Li S, Staats P, Subbaroyan J, Caraway D. Ten kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic peripheral polyneuropathy: 12-Month results from prospective open-label pilot study. Pain Pract 2021; 21:898-906. [PMID: 34251751 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to demonstrate that the paresthesia-independent 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can provide long-term pain relief in patients with peripheral polyneuropathy (PPN). Clinically diagnosed subjects with PPN refractory to conventional medical management were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter study between November 2015 and August 2016, after institutional review board approval and patient informed consent were obtained. METHODS Subjects underwent trial stimulation utilizing 2 epidural leads, and if successful, were implanted with a permanent 10 kHz SCS system and followed up for 12 months post-implant. Outcome measures included adverse events, pain, neurological assessments, disability, function, quality of life, pain interference, sleep, satisfaction, and global impression of change. Data are presented as descriptive statistics. Permanent implant population results are reported as mean ± standard error. RESULTS Twenty-one of the 26 trialed subjects had a successful trial and 18 received a permanent implant. All subjects had the leads placed anatomically without the need for paresthesia. Subjects experienced significant and sustained pain relief (at least 65% at all timepoints) whereas physicians noted improvements in neurological function. Significant improvements in disability, function, sleep, sensory, and affective dimensions of pain were reported at all timepoints. All adverse events were resolved without sequelae. CONCLUSION Findings from this study suggest that 10 kHz SCS may provide sustained pain relief and disability improvements in patients suffering from PPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paul Chang
- Georgia Pain Care, Stockbridge, Georgia, USA
| | - Sean Li
- Premier Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, USA
| | - Peter Staats
- Premier Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tieppo Francio V, Polston KF, Murphy MT, Hagedorn JM, Sayed D. Management of Chronic and Neuropathic Pain with 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Technology: Summary of Findings from Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9060644. [PMID: 34200097 PMCID: PMC8229652 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9060644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the inception of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in 1967, the technology has evolved dramatically with important advancements in waveforms and frequencies. One such advancement is Nevro’s Senza® SCS System for HF10, which received Food and Drug and Administration (FDA) approval in 2015. Low-frequency SCS works by activating large-diameter Aβ fibers in the lateral discriminatory pathway (pain location, intensity, quality) at the dorsal column (DC), creating paresthesia-based stimulation at lower-frequencies (30–120 Hz), high-amplitude (3.5–8.5 mA), and longer-duration/pulse-width (100–500 μs). In contrast, high-frequency 10 kHz SCS works with a proposed different mechanism of action that is paresthesia-free with programming at a frequency of 10,000 Hz, low amplitude (1–5 mA), and short-duration/pulse-width (30 μS). This stimulation pattern selectively activates inhibitory interneurons in the dorsal horn (DH) at low stimulation intensities, which do not activate the dorsal column fibers. This ostensibly leads to suppression of hyperexcitable wide dynamic range neurons (WDR), which are sensitized and hyperactive in chronic pain states. It has also been reported to act on the medial pathway (drives attention and pain perception), in addition to the lateral pathways. Other theories include a reversible depolarization blockade, desynchronization of neural signals, membrane integration, glial–neuronal interaction, and induced temporal summation. The body of clinical evidence regarding 10 kHz SCS treatment for chronic back pain and neuropathic pain continues to grow. There is high-quality evidence supporting its use in patients with persistent back and radicular pain, particularly after spinal surgery. High-frequency 10 kHz SCS studies have demonstrated robust statistically and clinically significant superiority in pain control, compared to paresthesia-based SCS, supported by level I clinical evidence. Yet, as the field continues to grow with the technological advancements of multiple waveforms and programming stimulation algorithms, we encourage further research to focus on the ability to modulate pain with precision and efficacy, as the field of neuromodulation continues to adapt to the modern healthcare era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinicius Tieppo Francio
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Keith F Polston
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Micheal T Murphy
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Jonathan M Hagedorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Petersen EA, Stauss TG, Scowcroft JA, Brooks ES, White JL, Sills SM, Amirdelfan K, Guirguis MN, Xu J, Yu C, Nairizi A, Patterson DG, Tsoulfas KC, Creamer MJ, Galan V, Bundschu RH, Paul CA, Mehta ND, Choi H, Sayed D, Lad SP, DiBenedetto DJ, Sethi KA, Goree JH, Bennett MT, Harrison NJ, Israel AF, Chang P, Wu PW, Gekht G, Argoff CE, Nasr CE, Taylor RS, Subbaroyan J, Gliner BE, Caraway DL, Mekhail NA. Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78:687-698. [PMID: 33818600 PMCID: PMC8022268 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Question Will 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation improve pain relief for patients with painful diabetic neuropathy refractory to medical management? Findings In this randomized clinical trial including 216 patients, there was a significant benefit of 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation, with 79% of treatment responders whose underlying neurological deficits did not worsen compared with 5% of controls treated with conventional medical management. Meaning Patients with painful diabetic neuropathy with inadequate pain relief despite best available medical treatments should be considered for 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation. Importance Many patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy experience chronic pain and inadequate relief despite best available medical treatments. Objective To determine whether 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation (SCS) improves outcomes for patients with refractory painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Design, Setting, and Participants The prospective, multicenter, open-label SENZA-PDN randomized clinical trial compared conventional medical management (CMM) with 10-kHz SCS plus CMM. Participants with PDN for 1 year or more refractory to gabapentinoids and at least 1 other analgesic class, lower limb pain intensity of 5 cm or more on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS), body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 45 or less, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 10% or less, daily morphine equivalents of 120 mg or less, and medically appropriate for the procedure were recruited from clinic patient populations and digital advertising. Participants were enrolled from multiple sites across the US, including academic centers and community pain clinics, between August 2017 and August 2019 with 6-month follow-up and optional crossover at 6 months. Screening 430 patients resulted in 214 who were excluded or declined participation and 216 who were randomized. At 6-month follow-up, 187 patients were evaluated. Interventions Implanted medical device delivering 10-kHz SCS. Main Outcomes and Measures The prespecified primary end point was percentage of participants with 50% pain relief or more on VAS without worsening of baseline neurological deficits at 3 months. Secondary end points were tested hierarchically, as prespecified in the analysis plan. Measures included pain VAS, neurological examination, health-related quality of life (EuroQol Five-Dimension questionnaire), and HbA1c over 6 months. Results Of 216 randomized patients, 136 (63.0%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 60.8 (10.7) years. Additionally, the median (interquartile range) duration of diabetes and peripheral neuropathy were 10.9 (6.3-16.4) years and 5.6 (3.0-10.1) years, respectively. The primary end point assessed in the intention-to-treat population was met by 5 of 94 patients in the CMM group (5%) and 75 of 95 patients in the 10-kHz SCS plus CMM group (79%; difference, 73.6%; 95% CI, 64.2-83.0; P < .001). Infections requiring device explant occurred in 2 patients in the 10-kHz SCS plus CMM group (2%). For the CMM group, the mean pain VAS score was 7.0 cm (95% CI, 6.7-7.3) at baseline and 6.9 cm (95% CI, 6.5-7.3) at 6 months. For the 10-kHz SCS plus CMM group, the mean pain VAS score was 7.6 cm (95% CI, 7.3-7.9) at baseline and 1.7 cm (95% CI, 1.3-2.1) at 6 months. Investigators observed neurological examination improvements for 3 of 92 patients in the CMM group (3%) and 52 of 84 in the 10-kHz SCS plus CMM group (62%) at 6 months (difference, 58.6%; 95% CI, 47.6-69.6; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Substantial pain relief and improved health-related quality of life sustained over 6 months demonstrates 10-kHz SCS can safely and effectively treat patients with refractory PDN. Trial Registration ClincalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03228420
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika A Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
| | | | | | | | | | - Shawn M Sills
- Touchstone Interventional Pain Center, Medford, Oregon
| | | | | | - Jijun Xu
- Department of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Cong Yu
- Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ali Nairizi
- Nevada Advanced Pain Specialists, Reno, Nevada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Christopher A Paul
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
| | - Neel D Mehta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Heejung Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
| | - Dawood Sayed
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Shivanand P Lad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Khalid A Sethi
- Department of Neurosurgery, United Health Services, Johnson City, New York
| | - Johnathan H Goree
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock
| | - Matthew T Bennett
- Department of Neurosurgery, United Health Services, Johnson City, New York
| | | | | | | | - Paul W Wu
- Holy Cross Hospital, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
| | - Gennady Gekht
- Coastal Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Bradenton, Florida
| | - Charles E Argoff
- Department of Neurology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Christian E Nasr
- Department of Endocrinology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rod S Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Nagy A Mekhail
- Department of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Feng H, Doherty P, Rotte A, Bovinet C. Amelioration of lower limb pain and foot drop with 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation: A case series. J Int Med Res 2021; 49:3000605211005954. [PMID: 34024183 PMCID: PMC8150420 DOI: 10.1177/03000605211005954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
There are limited treatment options for patients with foot drop and associated lower back and/or leg pain. We present a case series of three patients who received permanent implantation of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz SCS) devices. Following treatment, all patients reported sustained improvements in lower back and leg pain, foot mechanics and function which resulted in increased mobility and cessation of opioid use for pain management. Patients were followed up for approximately four years. Treatment with 10 kHz SCS may be a promising alternative to other interventional procedures commonly used for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honghui Feng
- Lawrence and Memorial Hospital, Yale New Haven Healthcare, New London, CT, USA
| | - Patrick Doherty
- Lawrence and Memorial Hospital, Yale New Haven Healthcare, New London, CT, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gupta M, Knezevic NN, Abd-Elsayed A, Ray M, Patel K, Chowdhury B. Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy-A Narrative Review of Pharmacological and Interventional Approaches. Biomedicines 2021; 9:biomedicines9050573. [PMID: 34069494 PMCID: PMC8161066 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9050573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus that is associated with a significant decline in quality of life. Like other painful neuropathic conditions, PDN is difficult to manage clinically, and a variety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological options are available for this condition. Recommended pharmacotherapies include anticonvulsive agents, antidepressant drugs, and topical capsaicin; and tapentadol, which combines opioid agonism and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, has also recently been approved for use. Additionally, several neuromodulation therapies have been successfully used for pain relief in PDN, including intrathecal therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Recently, 10 kHz SCS has been shown to provide clinically meaningful pain relief for patients refractory to conventional medical management, with a subset of patients demonstrating improvement in neurological function. This literature review is intended to discuss the dosage and prospective data associated with pain management therapies for PDN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayank Gupta
- Kansas Pain Management & Neuroscience Research Center, Overland Park, KS 66201, USA;
- Correspondence:
| | - Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
- Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60657, USA;
| | - Alaa Abd-Elsayed
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53715, USA;
| | - Mahoua Ray
- Kansas Pain Management & Neuroscience Research Center, Overland Park, KS 66201, USA;
| | - Kiran Patel
- Department of Pain Management, Spine and Pain Institute of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Bhavika Chowdhury
- Department of Endocrinology, Saint Luke’s South Hospital, Overland Park, KS 66213, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Luecke T, Edgar D, Huse D. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and/or leg pain: Summary of clinical studies. SAGE Open Med 2020; 8:2050312120951369. [PMID: 32913650 PMCID: PMC7444111 DOI: 10.1177/2050312120951369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain has a major impact on sufferers and their families. The associated health care costs are substantial. In the context of increasing prevalence, effective treatment options are ever more important. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation has been shown to effectively provide pain relief, aid in opioid reduction, and improve quality of life in patients with chronic intractable pain. The present review aims to summarize the clinical evidence related to the use of 10 kHz SCS in chronic back and/or leg pain. We searched the PubMed database between 2009 and 2 June 2020 for articles reporting clinical studies that included at least 10 human subjects permanently treated with a 10 kHz SCS system (Senza® system) for chronic back and/or leg pain for a minimum of 3 months. A randomized controlled trial (SENZA-RCT), as well as several prospective and retrospective studies, reported clinical outcomes in subjects with chronic back and leg pain treated with 10 kHz SCS. A high proportion of subjects (60%–80%) reported long-term response to therapy. Pain relief was provided without paresthesia. Other studies showed promising pain relief outcomes in subjects with back pain ineligible for spinal surgery, neuropathic limb pain, and in those with previously failed traditional low-frequency SCS. Most studies reported improved quality of life metrics and/or reduced opioid intake. Level 1 evidence has already been established for the use of 10 kHz SCS in treating chronic back and leg pain, corroborated by real-world, clinical experience. Exploratory studies also show the potential of the therapy in other refractory pain syndromes, although larger studies are desired to validate their findings. Overall, the literature suggests that 10 kHz SCS provides long-term pain relief in a high proportion of patients, along with improved quality of life and reduced opioid consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten Luecke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Franziskus Krankenhaus Linz, Linz am Rhein, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Huse
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Franziskus Krankenhaus Linz, Linz am Rhein, Germany
| |
Collapse
|