1
|
Odouard IC, Ballreich J, Lee B, Socal MP. Clinical Evidence Supporting FDA Approval of Gene and RNA Therapies for Rare Inherited Conditions. Paediatr Drugs 2024:10.1007/s40272-024-00645-7. [PMID: 39102172 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-024-00645-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gene and RNA therapies have potential to transform the treatment of rare inherited diseases, but there are concerns about the evidence supporting their use and high costs. OBJECTIVE We analyze the evidence supporting Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of gene and RNA therapies for rare inherited diseases and discuss implications for clinical practice and policy. METHODS We conducted a qualitative analysis of FDA documents outlining the basis of approval for gene and RNA therapies approved for rare inherited diseases between 2016 and 2023. For each drug, we gathered five characteristics of the evidence supporting FDA approval (no phase 3 trial, nonrandomized, no clinical endpoint, lack of demonstrated benefit, and significant protocol deviation) and four characteristics of the FDA approval process (prior rejection or complete response, negative committee vote, discrepancy between label and trial population, and boxed warning). The main outcome was the number of drugs with each characteristic. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2023, 19 gene and RNA therapies received FDA approval to treat rare inherited diseases. The most common limitations in the evidence supporting approval of these drugs were nonrandomized studies (8/19, 42%), no clinical endpoint (7/19, 37%), lack of demonstrated benefit or inconsistent results (4/19, 21%), and no phase 3 trial (4/19, 21%). Half (3/6) of accelerated approvals and 57% (5/9) of drugs with breakthrough designation had nonrandomized trials, and gene therapies with one-time dosing were overrepresented (5/7, 71%) among the drugs with nonrandomized trials. Five of six accelerated approvals (83%) and five of nine pediatric drugs (56%), most of which were indicated for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, had no clinical endpoint. Four of nine (44%) pediatric drugs and four of six (67%) accelerated approvals failed to demonstrate benefit compared with none of the nonpediatric drugs and none of the traditional approvals. Five drugs, which all had different indications and represented a mix of RNA and gene therapies, did not have any of these evidence characteristics. Among drugs that received prior rejections or negative committee opinions, all four had nonrandomized trials and lacked a clinical endpoint, and 75% (3/4) lacked demonstrated benefit. Five of nine (56%) pediatric drugs were indicated for broader age groups according to the drug label compared with the trial populations. Of the three drugs with boxed warnings, two had pediatric indications and nonrandomized studies, and one had no phase 3 trial. CONCLUSIONS Issues related to trial design, outcome, and data integrity in the evidence supporting FDA approval of rare inherited disease gene and RNA therapies raise questions about whether this evidence is adequate to inform prescribing decisions. Gene and RNA therapies with accelerated approval and pediatric indications were overrepresented among drugs lacking clinical endpoints or demonstrated benefit and should be the focus of efforts to reduce uncertainty in the evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilina C Odouard
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Hampton House 301, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Jeromie Ballreich
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Hampton House 301, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Branden Lee
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mariana P Socal
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Hampton House 301, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Callenbach MHE, Schoenmakers D, Vreman RA, Vijgen S, Timmers L, Hollak CEM, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Goettsch WG. Illustrating the Financial Consequences of Outcome-Based Payment Models From a Payers Perspective: The Case of Autologous Gene Therapy Atidarsagene Autotemcel (Libmeldy®). VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:1046-1057. [PMID: 38795960 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To illustrate the financial consequences of implementing different managed entry agreements (managed entry agreements for the Dutch healthcare system for autologous gene therapy atidarsagene autotemcel [Libmeldy]), while also providing a first systematic guidance on how to construct managed entry agreements to aid future reimbursement decision making and create patient access to high-cost, one-off potentially curative therapies. METHODS Three payment models were compared: (1) an arbitrary 60% price discount, (2) an outcome-based spread payment with discounts, and (3) an outcome-based spread payment linked to a willingness to pay model with discounts. Financial consequences were estimated for full responders (A), patients responding according to the predicted clinical pathway presented in health technology assessment reports (B), and unstable responders (C). The associated costs for an average patient during the time frame of the payment agreement, the total budget impact, and associated benefits expressed in quality-adjusted life-years of the patient population were calculated. RESULTS When patients responded according to the predicted clinical pathway presented in health technology assessment reports (scenario B), implementing outcome-based reimbursement models (models 2 and 3) had lower associated budget impacts while gaining similar benefits compared with the discount (scenario 1, €8.9 million to €6.6 million vs €9.2 million). In the case of unstable responders (scenario C), costs for payers are lower in the outcome-based scenarios (€4.1 million and €3.0 million, scenario 2C and 3C, respectively) compared with implementing the discount (€9.2 million, scenario 1C). CONCLUSIONS Outcome-based models can mitigate the financial risk of reimbursing atidarsagene autotemcel. This can be considerably beneficial over simple discounts when clinical performance was similar to or worse than predicted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelien H E Callenbach
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne Schoenmakers
- Department of Child Neurology, Expertise Center Amsterdam Leukodystrophy Center, including lead of MLDi registry, Emma's Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Medicine for Society, Platform at Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rick A Vreman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Sylvia Vijgen
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Lonneke Timmers
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Carla E M Hollak
- Medicine for Society, Platform at Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Expertise Center for Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wim G Goettsch
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Risse J, Krzemien M, Schnalke J, Heinemann T. Towards ethical drug pricing: the European Orphan Genomic Therapies Fund. Gene Ther 2024; 31:353-357. [PMID: 38658672 PMCID: PMC11257980 DOI: 10.1038/s41434-024-00452-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
An increasing number of novel genomic therapies are expected to become available for patients with rare or ultra-rare diseases. However, the primary obstacle to equal patient access to these orphan genomic therapies are currently very high prices charged by manufacturers in the context of limited healthcare budgets. Taking into account ethical pricing theories, the paper proposes the implementation of a pricing infrastructure covering all European member states, which has the potential to promote distributive justice while maintaining the attractiveness of genomic therapy development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Risse
- Institute for Medical Humanities, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Merlin Krzemien
- Institute for Medical Humanities, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan Schnalke
- Institute for Medical Humanities, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Heinemann
- Institute for Medical Humanities, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, D-53127, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ossandon H, Armijo N, Vargas C, Repetto GM, Espinoza MA. Challenges for gene therapy in the financial sustainability of health systems: a scoping review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024; 19:243. [PMID: 38915120 PMCID: PMC11197217 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03249-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To review the available evidence about the strategies implemented or proposed for coverage or reimbursement for currently approved gene therapies. METHODS A scoping review was conducted to analyze the evidence published during the years 2016 to 2023. The main search criteria were coverage or reimbursement of gene therapy by healthcare systems. The eligible articles were those that described or proposed a financing model used to provide coverage in the various systems around the world. RESULTS The study identified 279 publications, and after removing duplicates and screening for eligibility, 10 were included in the study. The results show that various financing models have been proposed, including subscription-based payment models, outcome-based payment models, and amortization strategies. However, several barriers to implementing these models were identified, such as deficiencies in informatics systems for data collection, changes in laws or regulations, the lack of accessible clinical endpoints and administrative costs. CONCLUSION This scoping review provides an overview of financing strategies for gene therapies. Gene therapies can cure rare or previously intractable diseases, but their high cost can make access difficult. Publishing experiences with these models can help evaluate their use and gather more evidence for their effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Ossandon
- Departamento de Coordinación de Garantías y Prestaciones de Salud, División de Planificación Sanitaria, Ministerio de Salud de Chile, Enrique McIver 421, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicolás Armijo
- Centro de Investigación Clínica, Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud (ETESA UC), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Centro Para la Prevención y Control del cáncer, Santiago, Chile
| | - Constanza Vargas
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gabriela M Repetto
- Rare Diseases Program, Institute of Science and Innovation in Medicine, Facultad de Medicina, Clinica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - Manuel Antonio Espinoza
- Centro de Investigación Clínica, Unidad de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud (ETESA UC), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
- Centro Para la Prevención y Control del cáncer, Santiago, Chile.
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abuloha S, Niu S, Adirika D, Harvey BP, Svensson M. A Review of the Cost-Effectiveness Evidence for FDA-Approved Cell and Gene Therapies. Hum Gene Ther 2024; 35:365-373. [PMID: 38526393 DOI: 10.1089/hum.2023.186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Cell and gene therapy (CGT) innovations have provided several significant breakthroughs in recent years. However, CGTs often come with a high upfront cost, raising questions about patient access, affordability, and long-term value. This study reviewed cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) studies that have attempted to assess the long-term value of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved CGTs. Two reviewers independently searched the Tufts Medical Center CEA Registry to identify all studies for FDA-approved CGTs, per January 2023. A data extraction template was used to summarize the evidence in terms of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and essential modeling assumptions, combined with a template to extract the adherence to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. The review identified 26 CEA studies for seven CGTs. Around half of the base-case cost-effectiveness results indicated that the cost per QALY was below $100,000-$150,000, often used as a threshold for reasonable cost-effectiveness in the United States. However, the results varied substantially across studies for the same treatment, ranging from being considered very cost-effective to far from cost-effective. Most models were based on data from single-arm trials with relatively short follow-ups, and different long-term extrapolations between studies caused large differences in the modeled cost-effectiveness results. In sum, this review showed that, despite the high upfront costs, many CGTs have cost-effectiveness evidence that can support long-term value. Nonetheless, substantial uncertainty regarding long-term value exists because so much of the modeling results are driven by uncertain extrapolations beyond the clinical trial data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumaya Abuloha
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
| | - Shu Niu
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Darlene Adirika
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Benjamin P Harvey
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mikael Svensson
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wadmann S, Johansen AB, Born AP, Kessel L. Infrastructuring precision medicine: Making gene therapies for rare diseases workable in practice. Soc Sci Med 2024; 351:116966. [PMID: 38759386 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Long viewed by social scientists as a future imaginary, precision medicine is now materializing in many healthcare systems in the form of new diagnostic practices and novel treatment modalities, such as gene therapies. Based on an ethnographic study of the introduction of the first two clinically available in-vivo gene therapies in the Danish healthcare system, we investigate what it takes to make these therapies workable in practice. Drawing on social science literature on infrastructuring, we describe the many forms of mundane work required to fit these therapies into regulatory frameworks, political processes and daily work practices in the healthcare system. Further, we observe how the processes of infrastructuring required to introduce the gene therapies into clinical practice had transformative implications as they redistributed roles and responsibilities among clinicians, pharmacists, procurement agencies and pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Wadmann
- The Danish Center for Social Science Research - VIVE, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, DK-1052 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Anna Brueckner Johansen
- The Danish Center for Social Science Research - VIVE, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, DK-1052 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alfred Peter Born
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Line Kessel
- Department of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fox TA, Booth C. Improving access to gene therapy for rare diseases. Dis Model Mech 2024; 17:dmm050623. [PMID: 38639083 PMCID: PMC11051979 DOI: 10.1242/dmm.050623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Effective gene therapy approaches have been developed for many rare diseases, including inborn errors of immunity and metabolism, haemoglobinopathies and inherited blindness. Despite successful pre-clinical and clinical results, these gene therapies are not widely available, primarily for non-medical reasons. Lack of commercial interest in therapies for ultra-rare diseases, costs of development and complex manufacturing processes required for advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are some of the main problems that are restricting access. The complexities and costs of navigating the regulatory environments in different jurisdictions for treatments that affect small numbers of patients is a problem unique to ATMPS for rare and ultra-rare diseases. In this Perspective, we outline some of the challenges and potential solutions that, we hope, will improve access to gene therapy for rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A. Fox
- UCL Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, NW3 2PP, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Booth
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, UCL, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hong J, Bae EY, Lee HJ, Lee TJ, Clarke P. Values, challenges, and responses associated with high-priced potential cures: perspectives of diverse stakeholders in South Korea. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2024; 22:20. [PMID: 38439068 PMCID: PMC10913648 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-024-00527-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The emergence of high-priced potential cures has sparked significant health policy discussions in South Korea, where the healthcare system is funded through a single-payer National Health Insurance model. We conducted focus group interviews (FGIs) and accompanying surveys with diverse stakeholders to comprehensively understand related issues and find better solutions to the challenges brought by these technologies. METHODS From October to November 2022, 11 FGIs were conducted with stakeholders from various sectors, including government payers, policy and clinical experts, civic and patient organisations, and the pharmaceutical industry, involving a total of 25 participants. These qualitative discussions were supplemented by online surveys to effectively capture and synthesise stakeholder perspectives. RESULTS Affordability was identified as a critical concern by 84% of stakeholders, followed by clinical uncertainty (76%) and limited value for money (72%). Stakeholders expressed a preference for both financial-based controls and outcome-based pricing strategies to mitigate these challenges. Despite the support for outcome-based refunds, payers raised concerns about the feasibility of instalment payment models, whether linked to outcomes or not, due to the specific challenges of the Korean reimbursement system and the potential risk of 'cumulative liabilities' from ongoing payments for previously administered treatments. In addition, the FGIs highlighted the need for clear budgetary limits for drugs with high uncertainties, with mixed opinions on the creation of special silo funds (64.0% agreement). Less than half (48%) endorsed the use of external reference pricing, currently applied to such essential drugs in South Korea. A significant majority (84%), predominantly non-pharma stakeholders, advocated for addressing cost-effectiveness uncertainty through re-assessment once long-term clinical data become available. CONCLUSIONS This study uncovers a broad agreement among stakeholders on the need for more effective value assessment methodologies for high-priced potential cures, stressing the importance of more robust and comprehensive re-assessment supported by long-term data collection, rather than primarily relying on external reference pricing. Each type of stakeholders exhibited a cautious approach to their specific uncertainties, suggesting that new funding strategies should accommodate these uncertainties with predefined guidelines and agreements prior to the initiation of managed entry agreements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihyung Hong
- Department of Healthcare Management, Gachon University, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Eun-Young Bae
- College of Pharmacy, Gyeongsang National University, 501 Jinju-daero, 52828, Jinju, South Korea.
| | - Hye-Jae Lee
- Department of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tae-Jin Lee
- Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Philip Clarke
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee MK, Seyedmousavi S, Auvity S, Pourroy B, Elleboode V, Kachaner I, Jansen C, Lilliu H. Forecasting the potential impact of cell and gene therapies in France: projecting product launches and patients treated. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1324602. [PMID: 38439899 PMCID: PMC10910012 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1324602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the potential impact of cell and gene therapies (CGTs) in France by forecasting the number of patients that will be treated with CGTs over the period 2023-2030 by therapeutic area and region. Methods A review of CGTs in clinical development and related disease epidemiology was conducted to forecast the number of CGT launches and patient population between 2023 and 2030. The number of expected launches was identified by filtering the clinical development pipeline with estimated time to launch and probability of success values from Project ALPHA. Disease prevalence and incidence in France were combined with projected adoption rates derived from historical data to forecast the patient population to be treated. Results Up to 44 new CGTs are forecasted to launch in France in the period 2023-2030, which translates into more than 69,400 newly treated patients in 2030. Leading indications in terms of newly treated patients per year include cardiovascular disease, hematological cancers and solid tumors with 27,300, 15,200 and 13,000 newly treated patients in 2030, respectively. Discussion The forecast suggests that the future landscape of CGTs will undergo a shift, moving from CGTs targeting (ultra) rare diseases to more prevalent diseases. In France, this will likely pose organizational challenges hindering patient access to these transformative therapies. Further research and planning around network organization and patient distribution are needed to assess and improve the readiness of the French healthcare system for ensuring access for this growing number of patients to be treated with CGTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sylvain Auvity
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, UMRS-1144, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropsychopharmacologie, Paris, France
- Service de Pharmacie, AP-HP, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
| | - Bertrand Pourroy
- Oncopharma Unit, Pharmacy Department, University Teaching Hospital la Timone, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kostadinov K, Marinova Y, Dimitrov K, Hristova-Atanasova E, Iskrov G, Stefanov R. Navigating Gene Therapy Access: The Case of Bulgaria in the Context of the EU Regulatory Landscape. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:458. [PMID: 38391833 PMCID: PMC10888421 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12040458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Gene therapies (GTs) have recently emerged as revolutionary personalized therapeutic options. Despite their promising potential, challenges such as uncertainty regarding long-term health benefits and safety, along with extreme price tags, pose significant obstacles to patient access. Within the EU, the European Medicines Agency plays a pivotal role with regards to GT market authorization. However, national authorities are responsible for pricing and reimbursement, which results in fragment patient access within the EU. This study aimed to provide an overview of the complex landscape of post-market authorization accessibility for GT products in Bulgaria, comparing it with neighboring EU countries. We applied a mixed-methods approach, including desk research, public data requests, and list price comparisons. As of 1 April 2023, 14 GTs had a valid market authorization at the EU level. In Bulgaria, Kymriah® was the only GT included in the Positive Drug List (PDL), with an official list price of EUR 335,636.94. Similar results were found in Romania, whereas five GTs were included in Greece's PDL. Additionally, Zolgensma® was found accessible in Bulgaria through an alternative individual access scheme at an estimated price of EUR 1,945,000.00. In conclusion, this study emphasized targeted policy interventions to address health inequalities and to ensure timely access to GTs within the EU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kostadin Kostadinov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Yuliyana Marinova
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Kostadin Dimitrov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 4023 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Eleonora Hristova-Atanasova
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Georgi Iskrov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 4023 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Rumen Stefanov
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
- Institute for Rare Diseases, 4023 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dayer VW, Drummond MF, Dabbous O, Toumi M, Neumann P, Tunis S, Teich N, Saleh S, Persson U, von der Schulenburg JMG, Malone DC, Salimullah T, Sullivan SD. Real-world evidence for coverage determination of treatments for rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024; 19:47. [PMID: 38326894 PMCID: PMC10848432 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03041-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) decisions for pharmaceuticals are complex and evolving. New rare disease treatments are often approved more quickly through accelerated approval schemes, creating more uncertainties about clinical evidence and budget impact at the time of market entry. The use of real-world evidence (RWE), including early coverage with evidence development, has been suggested as a means to support HTA decisions for rare disease treatments. However, the collection and use of RWE poses substantial challenges. These challenges are compounded when considered in the context of treatments for rare diseases. In this paper, we describe the methodological challenges to developing and using prospective and retrospective RWE for HTA decisions, for rare diseases in particular. We focus attention on key elements of study design and analyses, including patient selection and recruitment, appropriate adjustment for confounding and other sources of bias, outcome selection, and data quality monitoring. We conclude by offering suggestions to help address some of the most vexing challenges. The role of RWE in coverage and pricing determination will grow. It is, therefore, necessary for researchers, manufacturers, HTA agencies, and payers to ensure that rigorous and appropriate scientific principles are followed when using RWE as part of decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria W Dayer
- CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | | | - Omar Dabbous
- Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Bannockburn, IL, USA
| | - Mondher Toumi
- Faculty of Medicine, Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Shadi Saleh
- American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ulf Persson
- The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Daniel C Malone
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Sean D Sullivan
- CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Morgan G, Back E, Besser M, Hallett TB, Guzauskas GF. The value-based price of transformative gene therapy for sickle cell disease: a modeling analysis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:2739. [PMID: 38302678 PMCID: PMC10834512 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53121-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited, progressively debilitating blood disorder. Emerging gene therapies (GTx) may lead to a complete remission, the benefits of such can only be realized if GTx is affordable and accessible in the low-and middle-income countries (LMIC) with the greatest SCD burden. To estimate the health impacts and country-specific value-based prices (VBP) of a future gene therapy for SCD using a cost-utility model framework. We developed a lifetime Markov model to compare the costs and health outcomes of GTx versus standard of care for SCD. We modeled populations in seven LMICs and six high-income countries (HICs) estimating lifetime costs and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in comparison to estimates of a country's cost-effectiveness threshold. Each country's unique VBP for GTx was calculated via threshold analysis. Relative to SOC treatment alone, we found that hypothetical GTx reduced the number of people symptomatic with SCD over time leading to fewer DALYs. Across countries, VBPs ranged from $3.6 million (US) to $700 (Uganda). Our results indicate a wide range of GTx prices are required if it is to be made widely available and may inform burden and affordability for 'target product profiles' of GTx in SCD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Morgan
- Prime HCD, Mere House, Brook St, Knutsford, WA16 8GP, UK.
| | - Emily Back
- Prime HCD, Mere House, Brook St, Knutsford, WA16 8GP, UK
| | - Martin Besser
- Departments of Haematology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Timothy B Hallett
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gregory F Guzauskas
- Prime HCD, Mere House, Brook St, Knutsford, WA16 8GP, UK
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cavallo MC, Cavazza M, Bonifazi F, Casadei B, Cutini I, Tonietti B, Saccardi R, Zinzani P, Jommi C. Cost of implementing CAR-T activity and managing CAR-T patients: an exploratory study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:121. [PMID: 38254079 PMCID: PMC10804568 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10443-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) represent an innovation but raise issues for healthcare payers because of the uncertainty on impact at market launch, high cost and important organisational impact. The literature has focused on their assessment, appraisal and market access solutions. No evidence on the costs sustained to implement CAR-T is available and a few studies reported the cost of the CAR-T clinical pathway, including the activities that are remunerated through inpatient or outpatient fee-for-service/episode. This paper aims at filling the information gap, assessing the cost of implementing CAR-T activity and the full cost of managing the CAR-T clinical pathway. METHODS Cost analysis relied on the Activity Based Costing approach, which was applied to two Italian healthcare organisations, both CAR-T Centres authorized by the regional governments with a minimum of 20 patients treated with the first two CAR-T therapies launched on the market. RESULTS The cost of implementing CAR-T was estimated at €1.31 million (calculated for one of the organizations with complete data). Most of these costs (77%) were generated by quality assurance activity. The mean cost per patient entering the CAR-T pathway (59 and 27) and surviving at follow-up (21 and 5) ranges from €48K to €57K and from €96K to €106K, respectively. Fees for hospitalization and infusion of gene therapy accounts for more than 70% of these costs. The actual hospitalisation cost varies greatly across patients and is in general lower than the fee-for-episode paid by the region to the hospital. CONCLUSIONS Despite its limitations (exploratory nature; the time spent by staff on activities which are not remunerated through fees was estimated through interviews with the CAR-T coordinators; cost items are not fully comparable), this research highlighted the relevant organisational and economic impact of CAR-T and provided important insights for policy makers and healthcare managers: the necessity to invest resources in CAR-T implementation; the need for assessing activities which are not remunerated through fees for service / episode; the opportunity to shift from fee-for-episode / service to bundled payments for CAR-T clinical pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Caterina Cavallo
- Cergas, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Via Sarfatti, 10, Milano, 20136, Italy
| | - Marianna Cavazza
- Cergas, Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Via Sarfatti, 10, Milano, 20136, Italy
| | - Francesca Bonifazi
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Beatrice Casadei
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cutini
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Firenze, 50134, Italy
| | - Barbara Tonietti
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Firenze, 50134, Italy
| | - Riccardo Saccardi
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, Firenze, 50134, Italy
| | - PierLuigi Zinzani
- IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Claudio Jommi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Largo Donegani, 2, Novara, 28100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rejon-Parrilla JC, Espin J, Garner S, Kniazkov S, Epstein D. Pricing and reimbursement mechanisms for advanced therapy medicinal products in 20 countries. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1199500. [PMID: 38089054 PMCID: PMC10715052 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1199500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products are a type of therapies that, in some cases, hold great potential for patients without an effective current therapeutic approach but they also present multiple challenges to payers. While there are many theoretical papers on pricing and reimbursement (P&R) options, original empirical research is very scarce. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive international review of regulatory and P&R decisions taken for all ATMPs with centralized European marketing authorization in March 2022. Methods: A survey was distributed in July 2022 to representatives of 46 countries. Results: Responses were received from 20 countries out of 46 (43.5%). 14 countries reimbursed at least one ATMP. Six countries in this survey reimbursed no ATMPs. Conclusion: Access to ATMPs is uneven across the countries included in this study. This arises from regulatory differences, commercial decisions by marketing authorization holders, and the divergent assessment processes and criteria applied by payers. Moving towards greater equality of access will require cooperation between countries and stakeholders, for example, through the WHO Regional Office for Europe's Access to Novel Medicines Platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla
- Health Technology Assessment Area (AETSA), Andalusian Public Foundation Progress and Health (FPS), Seville, Spain
| | - Jaime Espin
- Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs, Granada, Spain
- CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Cátedra de Economía de la Salud y Dirección de Organizaciones Sanitarias (Esalud2), Granada, Spain
| | - Sarah Garner
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stanislav Kniazkov
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - David Epstein
- Department of Applied Economics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Horrow C, Kesselheim AS. Confronting High Costs And Clinical Uncertainty: Innovative Payment Models For Gene Therapies. Health Aff (Millwood) 2023; 42:1532-1540. [PMID: 37931198 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Gene therapies offer potentially life-changing benefits for patients, but their unprecedented high prices exacerbate challenges for reimbursement. Payers must confront high budgetary impacts, as a large up-front payment for each patient makes it difficult to predict and absorb costs. Payers also face considerable clinical uncertainty, as evidence for efficacy and durability is limited at approval. Alternative payment models may address these reimbursement problems and ensure equitable patient access. We developed a taxonomy of possible payment mechanisms for gene therapies, including installments, risk pools, reinsurance, price-volume agreements, expenditure caps, subscriptions, outcomes-based payments and rebates, warranties, population outcomes-based agreements, and coverage with evidence development. We illustrate how these payment models take three main approaches: amortization, which mitigates initial budget impact by spreading payments over time; risk spreading, which makes budgets more predictable by pooling costs with other payers or capping costs based on expected volume; and performance-based payment, which addresses clinical uncertainty by tying prices to patient- or population-level outcomes. We discuss each payment model, its advantages and challenges, and considerations for US payers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Horrow
- Caroline Horrow, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guzauskas GF, Hallett TB. The long-term impact and value of curative therapy for HIV: a modelling analysis. J Int AIDS Soc 2023; 26:e26170. [PMID: 37749063 PMCID: PMC10519941 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Curative therapies (CTx) to achieve durable remission of HIV disease without the need for antiretroviral therapy (ART) are currently being explored. Our objective was to model the long-term health and cost outcomes of HIV in various countries, the impact of future CTx on those outcomes and the country-specific value-based prices (VBPs) of CTx. METHODS We developed a decision-analytic model to estimate the future health economic impacts of a hypothetical CTx for HIV in countries with pre-existing access to ART (CTx+ART), compared to ART alone. We modelled populations in seven low-and-middle-income countries and five high-income countries, accounting for localized ART and other HIV-related costs, and calibrating variables for HIV epidemiology and ART uptake to reproduce historical HIV outcomes before projecting future outcomes to year 2100. Health was quantified using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Base case, pessimistic and optimistic scenarios were modelled for CTx+ART and ART alone. Based on long-term outcomes and each country's estimated health opportunity cost, we calculated the country-specific VBP of CTx. RESULTS The introduction of a hypothetical CTx lowered HIV prevalence and prevented future infections over time, which increased life-years, reduced the number of individuals on ART, reduced AIDS-related deaths, and ultimately led to fewer DALYs versus ART-alone. Our base case estimates for the VBP of CTx ranged from $5400 (Kenya) up to $812,300 (United States). Within each country, the VBP was driven to be greater primarily by lower ART coverage, lower HIV incidence and prevalence, and higher CTx cure probability. The VBP estimates were found to be greater in countries where HIV prevalence was higher, ART coverage was lower and the health opportunity cost was greater. CONCLUSIONS Our results quantify the VBP for future curative CTx that may apply in different countries and under different circumstances. With greater CTx cure probability, durability and scale up, CTx commands a higher VBP, while improvements in ART coverage may mitigate its value. Our framework can be utilized for estimating this cost given a wide range of scenarios related to the attributes of a given CTx as well as various parameters of the HIV epidemic within a given country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory F Guzauskas
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- HCD Economics, Daresbury, UK
| | - Timothy B Hallett
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ghinea N, Lipworth W, Kerridge I, Zalcberg JR. How therapeutic advances have transformed the medical landscape: a primer for clinicians. Intern Med J 2023; 53:1306-1310. [PMID: 37255280 DOI: 10.1111/imj.16142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Novel medicines are entering the market rapidly and are increasingly being used alone or in combination to treat illnesses of every sort. While transforming the lives of many patients, these new therapies have also forced us to reconsider the way we evaluate, use and fund medicines. This article offers a primer to help practitioners understand how the therapeutic landscape is changing and how this might impact the evidence generation, access to interventions, patient experience and quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narcyz Ghinea
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wendy Lipworth
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Kerridge
- Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Health Ethics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Haematology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John R Zalcberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health and School of Public Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ghanem B, Seoane-Vazquez E, Brown L, Rodriguez-Monguio R. Analysis of the Gene Therapies Authorized by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. Med Care 2023; 61:438-447. [PMID: 36884030 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gene therapy, altering the genes inside human cells, has recently emerged as an alternative for preventing and treating disease. Concerns have been expressed about the clinical value and the high cost of gene therapies. OBJECTIVE This study assessed the characteristics of the clinical trials, authorizations, and prices of gene therapies in the United States and the European Union. RESEARCH DESIGN We collected regulatory information from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and manufacturer-listed prices from the United States, UK, and Germany. Descriptive statistics and t tests were conducted in the study. RESULTS As of January 1, 2022, the FDA and EMA authorized 8 and 10 gene therapies, respectively. The FDA and EMA granted orphan designation to all gene therapies except talimogene laherparepvec. Pivotal clinical trials were nonrandomized, open level, uncontrolled, phase I-III, and included a limited number of patients. Study primary outcomes were mainly surrogate endpoints without demonstration of direct patient benefit. The price of gene therapies at market entry ranged from $200,064 to $2,125,000 million. CONCLUSIONS Gene therapy is used to treat incurable diseases that affect only a small number of patients (orphan diseases). Based on this, they are approved by the EMA and FDA with insufficient clinical evidence to ensure safety and efficacy, in addition to the high cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Buthainah Ghanem
- Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine
| | - Enrique Seoane-Vazquez
- Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine
- Economic Science Institute, Chapman University, Orange
| | - Lawrence Brown
- Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine
| | - Rosa Rodriguez-Monguio
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy
- Medication Outcomes Center
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Iglesias-López C, Agustí A, Vallano A, Obach M. Financing and Reimbursement of Approved Advanced Therapies in Several European Countries. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:841-853. [PMID: 36646280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The uncertainty in the cost-benefit of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) is a current challenge for their reimbursement in health systems. This study aimed to provide a comparative analysis of the National Health Authorities (NHAs) reimbursement recommendations issued in different European countries. METHODS The NHA reimbursement recommendations for the approved ATMPs were compared among 8 European Union (EU) Countries (EU8: Ireland, England/Wales, Scotland, The Netherlands, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy). The search was carried out until December 31, 2021. RESULTS A total of 19 approved ATMPs and 76 appraisal reports were analyzed. The majority of the ATMPs were reimbursed, although with uncertainty in added therapeutic value. No relationship between the type of the European Medicines Agency approval and reimbursement was found. Managed entry agreements, such as payment by results, were necessary to ensure market access. The main issue during the evaluation was to base the cost-effectiveness analyses on assumptions because of the limited long-term data. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio among countries reveals high variability. Overall, the median time to NHA recommendation for the EU8 is in the range of 9 to 17 months. CONCLUSIONS Transparent, harmonized, and systematic assessments across the EU NHAs in terms of cost-effectiveness, added therapeutic value, and grade of innovativeness are needed. This could lead to a more aligned access, increasing the EU market attractiveness and raising public fairness in terms of patient access and pricing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Iglesias-López
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antònia Agustí
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Clinical Pharmacology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Vallano
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Medicines Department, Catalan Healthcare Service, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Mercè Obach
- Healthcare Planning Department, Catalan Healthcare Service, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gavan SP, Wright SJ, Thistlethwaite F, Payne K. Capturing the Impact of Constraints on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cell and Gene Therapies: A Systematic Review. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:675-692. [PMID: 36905571 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01234-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decision-makers need to resolve constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies to patients as these treatments move into routine care. This study aimed to investigate if, and how, constraints that affect the expected cost and health consequences of cell and gene therapies have been included in published examples of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). METHOD A systematic review identified CEAs of cell and gene therapies. Studies were identified from previous systematic reviews and by searching Medline and Embase until 21 January 2022. Constraints described qualitatively were categorised by theme and summarised by a narrative synthesis. Constraints evaluated in quantitative scenario analyses were appraised by whether they changed the decision to recommend treatment. RESULTS Thirty-two CEAs of cell (n = 20) and gene therapies (n = 12) were included. Twenty-one studies described constraints qualitatively (70% cell therapy CEAs; 58% gene therapy CEAs). Qualitative constraints were categorised by four themes: single payment models; long-term affordability; delivery by providers; manufacturing capability. Thirteen studies assessed constraints quantitatively (60% cell therapy CEAs; 8% gene therapy CEAs). Two types of constraint were assessed quantitatively across four jurisdictions (USA, Canada, Singapore, The Netherlands): alternatives to single payment models (n = 9 scenario analyses); improving manufacturing (n = 12 scenario analyses). The impact on decision-making was determined by whether the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios crossed a relevant cost-effectiveness threshold for each jurisdiction (outcome-based payment models: n = 25 threshold comparisons made, 28% decisions changed; improving manufacturing: n = 24 threshold comparisons made, 4% decisions changed). CONCLUSION The net health impact of constraints is vital evidence to help decision-makers scale up the delivery of cell and gene therapies as patient volume increases and more advanced therapy medicinal products are launched. CEAs will be essential to quantify how constraints affect the cost-effectiveness of care, prioritise constraints to be resolved, and establish the value of strategies to implement cell and gene therapies by accounting for their health opportunity cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P Gavan
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Stuart J Wright
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Fiona Thistlethwaite
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Drummond M, Ciani O, Fornaro G, Jommi C, Dietrich ES, Espin J, Mossman J, de Pouvourville G. How are health technology assessment bodies responding to the assessment challenges posed by cell and gene therapy? BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:484. [PMID: 37179322 PMCID: PMC10182681 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09494-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this research were to provide a better understanding of the specific evidence needs for assessment of clinical and cost-effectiveness of cell and gene therapies, and to explore the extent that the relevant categories of evidence are considered in health technology assessment (HTA) processes. METHODS A targeted literature review was conducted to identify the specific categories of evidence relevant to the assessment of these therapies. Forty-six HTA reports for 9 products in 10 cell and gene therapy indications across 8 jurisdictions were analysed to determine the extent to which various items of evidence were considered. RESULTS The items to which the HTA bodies reacted positively were: treatment was for a rare disease or serious condition, lack of alternative therapies, evidence indicating substantial health gains, and when alternative payment models could be agreed. The items to which they reacted negatively were: use of unvalidated surrogate endpoints, single arm trials without an adequately matched alternative therapy, inadequate reporting of adverse consequences and risks, short length of follow-up in clinical trials, extrapolating to long-term outcomes, and uncertainty around the economic estimates. CONCLUSIONS The consideration by HTA bodies of evidence relating to the particular features of cell and gene therapies is variable. Several suggestions are made for addressing the assessment challenges posed by these therapies. Jurisdictions conducting HTAs of these therapies can consider whether these suggestions could be incorporated within their existing approach through strengthening deliberative decision-making or performing additional analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Drummond
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
- CERGAS, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy.
| | - Oriana Ciani
- CERGAS, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Jommi
- CERGAS, SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Jaime Espin
- Andalusian School of Public Health, Andalusia, Spain
| | - Jean Mossman
- Patient Representative and Visiting Senior Research Associate in the Medical Technology Research Group, LSE Health, London School of Economics, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gye A, Goodall S, De Abreu Lourenco R. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Tisagenlecleucel Versus Blinatumomab in Children and Young Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Partitioned Survival Model to Assess the Impact of an Outcome-Based Payment Arrangement. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:175-186. [PMID: 36266557 PMCID: PMC9883311 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01188-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This research assesses the impact of an outcome-based payment arrangement (OBA) linking complete remission (CR) to survival as a means of maintaining cost-effectiveness for a chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS A partitioned survival model (PSM) was used to model the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel versus blinatumomab in ALL from the Australian healthcare system perspective. A decision tree modeled different OBAs by funneling patients into a series of PSMs based on response. Outcomes were informed by individual patient data, while costs followed Australian treatment practices. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were combined to calculate a single incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), reported in US dollars (2022) at a discount rate of 5% on costs and outcomes. RESULTS For the base case, incremental costs and benefit were $379,595 and 4.27 QALYs, giving an ICER of $88,979. The ICER was most sensitive to discount rate ($57,660-$75,081), "cure point" ($62,718-$116,206) and extrapolation method ($76,018-$94,049). OBAs had a modest effect on the ICER when response rates varied. A responder-only payment was the most effective arrangement for maintaining the ICER ($88,249-$89,434), although this option was associated with the greatest financial uncertainty. A split payment arrangement (payment on infusion followed by payment on response) reduced variability in the ICER ($82,650-$99,154) compared with a single, upfront payment ($77,599-$107,273). CONCLUSION OBAs had a modest impact on reducing cost-effectiveness uncertainty. The value of OBAs should be weighed against the additional resources needed to administer such arrangements, and importantly overall cost to government.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Gye
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
| | - Stephen Goodall
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Level 12, Building 10, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Level 12, Building 10, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Quinn C, Ciarametaro M, Sils B, Phares S, Trusheim M. Medicaid best price reforms to enable innovative payment models for cell and gene therapies. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:191-203. [PMID: 36579425 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2159813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cell and gene therapies promise durable benefits but face financial challenges from the uncertainty in their performance. Value-based purchasing arrangements (VBPAs) can address uncertainty but have been inhibited in the US by the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP) approach to determining Medicaid Best Price (MBP) rebates. The likely effectiveness of MDRP reform proposals enabling VBPAs is examined in this study for durable cell and gene therapies. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations examined three potential reforms (Multiple Best Prices, Bundled Sales, and National Pooling) to determine the impact on payment misalignment, the required payer size to participate, and the percentage of total lives covered by a VBPA. RESULTS Simulation results suggest that 11% to 54% of commercial US lives would be feasibly covered by a VBPA depending on reform type and condition size. MPB reform achieved the highest commercial contracted percentage and lowest misalignment for commercial payers compared to National Pooling and Bundled Sales. State Medicaid plan results suggest lower extreme misalignment across all successfully contracted instances than commercial payers. CONCLUSIONS The Multiple Best Prices will likely enable VBPAs for many durable cell and gene therapies and larger payers. Further reforms may be needed to extend VBPAs to ultra-orphan conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey Quinn
- Center for Biomedical Systems Design, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Brian Sils
- National Pharmaceutical Council, Washington DC, USA
| | | | - Mark Trusheim
- Center for Biomedical Systems Design, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lee S, Lee JH. Cell and gene therapy regulatory, pricing, and reimbursement framework: With a focus on South Korea and the EU. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1109873. [PMID: 36908458 PMCID: PMC9998493 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1109873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Ever since relevant bioengineering technologies have sufficiently matured to the platformizable commercialization stage, a slew of money has flocked to the cell and gene therapy market over the last few years, resulting in an abundance of clinical studies in the field. Newer modalities have brought up a string of regulatory and legislative tasks, such as developing guidelines and legislative rules to systematically regulate newer pharmaceutical products. Accordingly, another layer of legislation and guidelines tailored for cell and gene therapies has been introduced and is expected to evolve on par with technological progress. Furthermore, authorities have shifted to pricing and reimbursement policies that can share risks for cost and outcome among stakeholders altogether, such as developers and the government, while expanding the accessibility of patients to innovative cell and gene therapies. This review attempts to capture the salient regulatory features of the cell and gene therapy market in the context of South Korea and the European Union and points out where two sovereign entities currently stand on each policy element and how each tackles regulatory challenges. We can observe the converging trend where regulatory, pricing and reimbursement rules of adjoining countries in the supranational union or member countries of a consortium are getting more aligned. Evidently, concerted efforts to share regulatory science knowledge and embrace reference pricing have played their parts. The authors argue that policy priorities should be placed on initiatives to harmonize with other medical authorities to better the rights of patients and clear out the uncertainties of developers, ultimately to share and advance regulatory science and layout forward-looking policies at opportune times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SungKyung Lee
- Center for Growth Engine Industries, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (KIET), Sejong, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Hyuk Lee
- College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Callenbach MHE, Vreman RA, Mantel-Teeuwisse AK, Goettsch WG. When Reality Does Not Meet Expectations-Experiences and Perceived Attitudes of Dutch Stakeholders Regarding Payment and Reimbursement Models for High-Priced Hospital Drugs. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 20:340. [PMID: 36612665 PMCID: PMC9819658 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to identify the current experiences with and future preferences for payment and reimbursement models for high-priced hospital therapies in the Netherlands, where the main barriers lie and assess how policy structures facilitate these models. A questionnaire was sent out to Dutch stakeholders (in)directly involved in payment and reimbursement agreements. The survey contained statements assessed with Likert scales, rankings and open questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Thirty-nine stakeholders (out of 100) (in)directly involved with reimbursement decision-making completed the survey. Our inquiry showed that currently financial-based reimbursement models are applied most, especially discounts were perceived best due to their simplicity. For the future, outcome-based reimbursement models were preferred, particularly pay-for-outcome models. The main stated challenge for implementation was generating evidence in practice. According to the respondents, upfront payments are currently implemented most often, whereas delayed payment models are preferred to be applied more frequently in the future. Particularly payment-at-outcome-achieved models are preferred; however, they were stated as administratively challenging to arrange. The respondents were moderately satisfied with the payment and reimbursement system in the Netherlands, arguing that the transparency of the final agreements and mutual trust could be improved. These insights can provide stakeholders with future direction when negotiating and implementing innovative reimbursement and payment models. Attention should be paid to the main barriers that are currently perceived as hindering a more frequent implementation of the preferred models and how national policy structures can facilitate a successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelien H. E. Callenbach
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rick A. Vreman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), 1112 ZA Diemen, The Netherlands
| | - Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Wim G. Goettsch
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), 1112 ZA Diemen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Budget Impact Analysis of Idecabtagene Vicleucel for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma in the US. Clin Drug Investig 2022; 42:1085-1092. [DOI: 10.1007/s40261-022-01215-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
27
|
Poveda JL, Bretón-Romero R, Del Rio-Bermudez C, Taberna M, Medrano IH. How can artificial intelligence optimize value-based contracting? J Pharm Policy Pract 2022; 15:85. [PMID: 36401303 PMCID: PMC9673444 DOI: 10.1186/s40545-022-00475-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Efforts in the pharmaceutical market have been aimed at ensuring that the benefits obtained from the introduction of new therapies justify the associated costs. In recent years, drug payment models in healthcare have undergone a dramatic shift from focusing on volume (i.e., size of the target clinical population) to focusing on value (i.e., drug performance in real-world settings). In this context, value-based contracts (VBCs) were designed to align the payment of a drug to its clinical performance outside clinical trials by evaluating the effectiveness using real-word evidence (RWE). Despite their widespread implementation, different factors jeopardize the application of VBCs to most marketed drugs in a near future, including the need for easily measurable and relevant outcomes associated with clinical improvements, and access to a large patient population to assess said outcomes. Here, we argue that the extraction and analysis of massive amounts of RWE captured in patients' electronic health records (EHRs) will circumvent these issues and optimize negotiations in VBCs. Particularly, the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) has proven successful in the analysis of structured and unstructured clinical information in EHRs in multicenter research studies. Thus, the application of NLP to analyze patient-centered information in EHRs in the context of innovative contracting can be utterly beneficial as it enables the real-time evaluation of treatment response and financial impact in real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Luis Poveda
- Pharmacy Department, Drug Clinical Area, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Avda. Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Landfeldt E. Gene Therapy for Neuromuscular Diseases: Health Economic Challenges and Future Perspectives. J Neuromuscul Dis 2022; 9:675-688. [DOI: 10.3233/jnd-221540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Highly efficacious, potentially curative gene therapies holds immense clinical promise, but also present complex challenges. At the time of regulatory approval and health technology assessment (HTA), evidence of efficacy and safety of gene therapies is often uncertain. In addition, research, development, and manufacturing costs, small pools of eligible patients, and the fact that many gene therapies are administered only once means that they frequently are associated with very high “one-off” price points. Although only a limited number of products have been brought to market globally, hundreds of clinical trials of gene therapies, including several of monogenetic neuromuscular diseases, are currently ongoing. Over time, as more and more conditions become amendable to gene therapy, the number of transformative, high-cost treatments is likely to increase considerably. For these reasons, concerns have been raised regarding the suitability of current health policy systems, including HTA frameworks, in ensuring appropriate access to these therapeutic innovations while simultaneously safeguarding value for taxpayers’ money, as well as affordability and sustainability. This review provides a summary overview of current challenges and future perspectives of gene therapies for neuromuscular diseases from a health economic point of view.
Collapse
|
29
|
Aguilera-Cobos L, Rosario-Lozano MP, Ponce-Polo A, Blasco-Amaro JA, Epstein D. Barriers for the evaluation of advanced therapy medicines and their translation to clinical practice: Umbrella review. Health Policy 2022; 126:1248-1255. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
30
|
Whitaker M. The Advanced Therapies Treatment Centres and their Network: a Model for the Accelerated Adoption of Advanced Therapies. Hum Gene Ther 2022; 33:857-864. [PMID: 36070453 DOI: 10.1089/hum.2022.150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging advanced therapies that include cell and gene therapies and tissue-engineered products offer substantial therapeutic benefits. They also present challenges for health services in their modes of delivery to patients. Funding was made available in the UK to establish three Advanced Therapies Treatment Centres (ATTCs) and a network to coordinate their activities, supported by the Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult (CGTC). The aim of this initiative was to grow the advanced therapies sector in the UK by enhancing access to the NHS for patients and industry through close collaboration between advanced therapy companies and publicly funded services and regulators. Here, we describe the initiative's antecedents, its collaborative structures and management and its activities. A guiding concept in shaping and assessing progress has been the idea of institutional readiness, an idea developed in the context of social sciences that defines and so can measure movement towards an organisation's full competence in delivering new technologies and approaches. We also report the initiative's outcomes and impacts as assessed by ourselves and by third parties. As the initiative has progressed it has excited increasing interest from advanced therapy companies who were not aware of or engaged in it at the outset and from healthcare systems that wished to learn from its practices. It is to further that end that we present our work.
Collapse
|
31
|
Koleva-Kolarova R, Buchanan J, Vellekoop H, Huygens S, Versteegh M, Mölken MRV, Szilberhorn L, Zelei T, Nagy B, Wordsworth S, Tsiachristas A. Financing and Reimbursement Models for Personalised Medicine: A Systematic Review to Identify Current Models and Future Options. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2022; 20:501-524. [PMID: 35368231 PMCID: PMC9206925 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-021-00714-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of healthcare interventions described as 'personalised medicine' (PM) is increasing rapidly. As healthcare systems struggle to decide whether to fund PM innovations, it is unclear what models for financing and reimbursement are appropriate to apply in this context. OBJECTIVE To review financing and reimbursement models for PM, summarise their key characteristics, and describe whether they can influence the development and uptake of PM. METHODS A literature review was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Econlit to identify studies published in English between 2009 and 2021, and reviews published before 2009. Grey literature was identified through Google Scholar, Google and subject-specific webpages. Articles that described financing and reimbursement of PM, and financing of non-PM were included. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively to report on the models, as well as facilitators, incentives, barriers and disincentives that could influence PM development and uptake. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-three papers were included. Research and development of PM was financed through both public and private sources and reimbursed largely through traditional models such as single fees, Diagnosis-Related Groups, and bundled payments. Financial-based reimbursement, including rebates and price-volume agreements, was mainly applied to targeted therapies. Performance-based reimbursement was identified mainly for gene and targeted therapies, and some companion diagnostics. Gene therapy manufacturers offered outcome-based rebates for treatment failure for interventions including Luxturna®, Kymriah®, Yescarta®, Zynteglo®, Zolgensma® and Strimvelis®, and coverage with evidence development for Kymriah® and Yescarta®. Targeted testing with OncotypeDX® was granted value-based reimbursement through initial coverage with evidence development. The main barriers and disincentives to PM financing and reimbursement were the lack of strong links between stakeholders and the lack of demonstrable benefit and value of PM. CONCLUSIONS Public-private financing agreements and performance-based reimbursement models could help facilitate the development and uptake of PM interventions with proven clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Heleen Vellekoop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Huygens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - László Szilberhorn
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Zelei
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Nagy
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Simoens S, De Groote K, Boersma C. Critical Reflections on Reimbursement and Access of Advanced Therapies. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:771966. [PMID: 35662719 PMCID: PMC9157586 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.771966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The health economic literature has questioned the cost-effectiveness and affordability of advanced therapies, proposed adjustments to value assessment frameworks, and discussed the use of outcome-based managed entry agreements and staggered payments in the last few years. The aim of this manuscript is to conduct a critical reflection on assessment criteria and access conditions for reimbursement of advanced therapies. Methods: A narrative review of the peer-reviewed literature and grey literature was conducted in April 2021 by searching PubMed; Google Scholar; policy and legislative documents; websites of health technology assessment agencies, advanced therapy organisations, governmental advanced therapy innovation programmes, consultancy agencies; ISPOR conference abstracts and presentations. Results: Based on the available evidence, this manuscript argues that: a) advanced therapies can be cost-effective at high prices set by manufacturers; b) the economic evaluation framework adopted by many payers under-values these products; c) advanced therapies can be affordable and may not require spread payments; d) outcome-based managed entry agreements are theoretically attractive, but challenging in practice; e) the cost-effectiveness of advanced therapies depends on the outcome-based managed entry agreement and payment approach; f) there is a role for multinational collaborations to manage reimbursement and access of advanced therapies. Conclusions: This manuscript shows that there is no single approach to reimbursement and access of advanced therapies. Instead, we support a more tailored assessment of health economic aspects of advanced therapies, which considers the heterogeneity of these products and their target populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Cornelis Boersma
- Health Ecore, Zeist, Netherlands.,Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Netherlands.,University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Whittal A, Jommi C, De Pouvourville G, Taylor D, Annemans L, Schoonaert L, Vermeersch S, Hutchings A, Patris J. Facilitating [corrected] More Efficient Negotiations for Innovative Therapies: A Value-Based Negotiation Framework. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2022; 38:e23. [PMID: 35274602 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462322000095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES An increasing number of innovative therapies (e.g., gene- and cell-based treatments) have been developed in the past 20 years. Despite the significant clinical potential of these therapies, access delays may arise because of differing perspectives of manufacturers and payers regarding issues such as the value of the product, clinical and financial uncertainties, and sustainability.Managed entry agreements (MEAs) can enable access to treatments that would not be reimbursed by conventional methods because of such concerns. However, although MEA typologies exist, there is currently no structured process to come to agreements on MEAs, which can be difficult to decide upon and implement.To facilitate more structured MEA negotiations, we propose a conceptual "value-based negotiation framework" with corresponding application tools. METHODS The framework was developed based on an iterative process of scientific literature review and expert input. RESULTS The framework aims to (i) systematically identify and prioritize manufacturer and payer concerns about a new treatment, and (ii) select a mutually acceptable combination of MEA terms that can best address priority concerns, with the lowest possible implementation burden. CONCLUSIONS The proposed framework will be tested in practice, and is a step toward supporting payers and manufacturers to engage in more structured, transparent negotiations to balance the needs of both sides, and enabling quicker, more transparent MEA negotiations and patient access to innovative products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudio Jommi
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - David Taylor
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lieven Annemans
- Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Julien Patris
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Brussels, Belgium
- Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Zug, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Modeling Benefits, Costs, and Affordability of a Novel Gene Therapy in Hemophilia A. Hemasphere 2022; 6:e679. [PMID: 35141470 PMCID: PMC8820916 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. The objective was to undertake an early cost-effectiveness assessment of valoctocogene roxaparvovec (valrox; Roctavian) compared to factor (F)VIII prophylaxis or emicizumab (Hemlibra; Roche HQ, Bazel, Switzerland) in patients with severe Hemophilia A (HA) without FVIII-antibodies. We also aimed to incorporate and quantify novel measures of value such as treatment durability, maximum value-based price (MVBP) and break-even time (ie, time until benefits begin to offset upfront payment). We constructed a Markov model to model bleeds over time which were linked to costs and quality-of-life decrements. In the valrox arm, FVIII over time was estimated combining initial effect and treatment waning and then linked to bleeds. In FVIII and emicizumab arms, bleeds were based on trial evidence. Evidence and assumptions were validated using expert elicitation. Model robustness was tested via sensitivity analyses. A Dutch societal perspective was applied with a 10-year time horizon. Valrox in comparison to FVIII, and emicizumab showed small increases in quality-adjusted life years at lower costs, and were therefore dominant. Valrox’ base case MVBP was estimated at €2.65 million/treatment compared to FVIII and €3.5 million/treatment versus emicizumab. Mean break-even time was 8.03 years compared to FVIII and 5.68 years to emicizumab. Early modeling of patients with HA in The Netherlands treated with valrox resulted in estimated improved health and lower cost compared to prophylactic FVIII and emicizumab. We also demonstrated feasibility of incorporation of treatment durability and novel outcomes such as value-based pricing scenarios and break-even time. Future work should aim to better characterize uncertainties and increase translation of early modeling to direct research efforts.
Collapse
|
35
|
Qiu T, Pochopień M, Hanna E, Liang S, Wang Y, Han R, Toumi M, Aballéa S. Challenges in the market access of regenerative medicines, and implications for manufacturers and decision-makers: a systematic review. Regen Med 2022; 17:119-139. [PMID: 35042424 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2021-0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Regenerative medicines (RMs) are expected to transform the treatment paradigm of rare, life-threatening diseases, while substantial challenges impede its market access. This study aimed to present these challenges. Materials & methods: Publications identified in the Medline and Embase databases until December 2020 were included. Results: Uncertainties around the relative effectiveness and long-term benefits of RMs are most scrutinized. A new reference case for RMs is questionable, but examining impacts of study perspective, time horizon, discount rate and extrapolation methods on estimates is advised. Establishing reasonable prices of RMs requires increased transparency in the development costs and better values measurements. Outcome-based payments require considerable investments and potential legislative adjustments. Conclusion: Greater flexibility for health technology assessment and economic analyses of RMs is necessary. This comprehensive review may prompt more multi-stakeholder conversations to discuss the optimized strategy for value assessment, pricing and payment in order to accelerate the market access of RMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Qiu
- Department of Public Health, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France
| | - Michał Pochopień
- Department of Public Health, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France.,Creativ-Ceutical, 215, Rue du Faubourg St-Honoré, 75008, Paris, France
| | - Eve Hanna
- Creativ-Ceutical, 215, Rue du Faubourg St-Honoré, 75008, Paris, France
| | - Shuyao Liang
- Department of Public Health, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France
| | - Yitong Wang
- Department of Public Health, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France
| | - Ru Han
- Department of Public Health, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France
| | - Mondher Toumi
- Department of Public Health, Aix-Marseille University, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385, Marseille, France
| | - Samuel Aballéa
- Creativ-Ceutical, 215, Rue du Faubourg St-Honoré, 75008, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Soteriou A. Welcome to volume 17 of Regenerative Medicine. Regen Med 2021; 17:1-3. [PMID: 34913725 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2021-0144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Soteriou
- Future Science Group, Unitec House, 2 Albert Place, London, N3 1QB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dabbous M, Toumi M, Simoens S, Wasem J, Saal G, Wang Y, Osuna JLH, François C, Annemans L, Graf von der Schulenburg JM, Sola-Morales O, Malone D, Garrison LP. Amortization of gene replacement therapies: A health policy analysis exploring a mechanism for mitigating budget impact of high-cost treatments. Health Policy 2021; 126:49-59. [PMID: 34863529 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
With gene replacement therapies (GRTs) increasingly and rapidly reaching the healthcare marketplace, the vast potential for improving patient health is matched by the potential budgetary impact for healthcare payers. GRTs are highly valuable given their potential life-extending or even curative benefits and may provide significant cost-offsets compared with standard of care. Current healthcare systems are, however, struggling to fund such valuable but costly therapies. Some payers have already implemented specific financing models to account for the new treatment paradigms, but these do not address the budget impact in the year of acquisition or administration of these costly technologies. This health policy analysis aimed to assess the rationale and feasibility of amortization, within the context of financing healthcare technologies, and specifically GRTs. Amortization is an accounting concept applied to intangible assets that allows for spreading the cost an intangible asset over time, allowing for repayment to occur via interest and principal payments sufficient to repay the intangible asset in full by its maturity. Our systematic scoping review on the amortization of healthcare technologies found a very small literature base with even that being unclear and inconsistent in its understanding of the issues. Where amortization was proposed as a solution for funding costly, but highly valuable GRTs, the concept was not fully investigated in detail, nor was the feasibility of the approach fully challenged. However, by providing clear definitions of relevant concepts along with an example of amortization models applied to some example GRTs, we propose that amortization can offer a promising method for funding of extraordinarily high-value healthcare technologies, thereby increasing market and patient access for these technologies. Nonetheless, healthcare accounting principles and financing guidelines must evolve to apply amortization to the rapidly developing GRTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique Dabbous
- University of Aix-Marseille, Public Health Department, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille, France.
| | - Mondher Toumi
- University of Aix-Marseille, Public Health Department, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille, France
| | - Steven Simoens
- KU Leuven, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Oude Markt 13, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Juergen Wasem
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Health Services Management, Forsthausweg 2, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
| | - Gauri Saal
- ApotheCom, A MEDiSTRAVA company, Holborn Gate, 26 Southampton Buildings, Holborn, London WC2A1, United Kingdom
| | - Yitong Wang
- University of Aix-Marseille, Public Health Department, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille, France
| | - José Luis Huerta Osuna
- University of Paris-Est Creteil, 61 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94000 Créteil and Creativ-Ceutical, 215 rue du Faubourg Saint-Honore, 75008 Paris, France
| | - Clément François
- University of Aix-Marseille, Public Health Department, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille, France
| | - Lieven Annemans
- Interuniversity Center for Health Economic Research (ICHER), Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | - Daniel Malone
- University of Utah, College of Pharmacy, 30 2000 E, Salt Lake City UT 84112, United States
| | - Louis P Garrison
- University of Washington, Department of Pharmacy, Health Sciences Building, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 357630, Seattle, WA 98195, United States
| |
Collapse
|