Unintended consequences: surgical complications in gynecologic cancer

Impact of obese patients in ovarian cancer surgery on postoperative wound complications: A meta-analysis

The effect of obesity on wound-related outcomes in post-ovarian cancer patients is not clear. A number of studies on the association of fat with post-operation injury in ovarian carcinoma have produced contradictory findings. This study aims to conduct a study of the available data to assess the association of obese individuals with significant surgery results in ovarian cancer. We looked up Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed for qualifying research on ovarian cancer operations to determine the primary evidence for evaluating the association of obesity with post-surgical wound injury in ovarian cancer. The odds ratio (OR) was analysed with a fixed effect model if the variability of the study was small; otherwise, the analysis of the data was done with a random effect model. Out of 1259 related trials which were reviewed for eligibility, 6 publications were chosen from 2009 to 2019, 3076 patients who had had an operation for ovarian cancer. Obesity has been linked to an increased rate of wound-related complications in ovarian cancer operations compared to those without obesity (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37, 0.69 p < 0.0001). Non-obesity was significantly less likely to occur with respect to operation time compared to those with obesity (MD, -48.00; 95% CI, -55.33, -40.68 p < 0.00001). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of haemorrhage after the operation (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.04, 1.57, p = 0.14). Because of the limited number of trials in this meta-analysis, caution should be exercised in their treatment. More high-quality research with a large sample is required in order to confirm the findings.

Impact of Obesity on Major Surgical Outcomes in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of obesity on the surgical outcomes in patients after primary ovarian cancer surgery is unclear. We aimed at conducting a meta-analysis to evaluate the associations between obesity and major surgical outcomes in ovarian cancer patients.

METHOD

Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for eligible studies. Study-specific relative risks (RR) were pooled using fixed effect model when little evidence of heterogeneity was detected, otherwise random effect model was employed.

RESULTS

Twelve eligible studies were identified. The pooled incidence rates of all complications were 38% (95% CI: 29%, 47%) for obese patients and 27% (95% CI: 18%, 36%) for non-obese patients. Compared with the non-obese patients, there was a significantly increased risk of all complications in obese patients after ovarian cancer surgery, with a pooled RR of 1.75 (95% CI: 1.26, 2.43). For advanced (stages III-IV) ovarian cancer, the pooled RR of all complications was 1.55 (95% CI: 1.07, 2.24). Obese patients after ovarian cancer surgery were at higher risks of wound complication (pooled RR: 7.06, 95% CI: 3.23, 15.40) and infection (pooled RR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.47, 2.55) compared with non-obese patients. Such increased risk was not observed for other major complications, namely, venous thromboembolism, ileus and organ failure. Hospital stay days between obese patients and non-obese patients were similar (Standardized Mean Difference: -0.28, 95% CI: -0.75, 0.19). The rates of optimal debulking (pooled RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.03), readmission/return to operation room (pooled RR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.56, 2.57) and 30-day mortality (pooled RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.66) were also comparable between obese patients and non-obese patients.

CONCLUSION

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, especially wound complications and infection after primary ovarian cancer surgery. Obesity may not affect their optimal debulking rates and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery. Besides, to improve surgical outcomes, an advanced minimally invasive robotic approach seems to be feasible for the treatment of obese patients with ovarian cancer.

Ovarian Carcinosarcoma with Retroperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymph Node Dissemination Followed by an Unusual Postoperative Complication: A Case Report with a Brief Literature Review

Introduction. Ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS), also known as malignant mixed Müllerian tumour (MMMT), is one of the rarest histological subtypes of ovarian cancer. It is an aggressive tumour with a dismal prognosis-the median survival of patients is less than two years. The rarity of the disease generates many controversies about histogenesis, prognostic factors and treatment of OCS. Histologically, OCS is composed of an epithelial and sarcomatous component. Case report. In the present case, a patient with bilateral ovarian cysts and bulky paraaortic lymph nodes is reported. Retroperitoneal paraaortic lymph node metastases were the only extrapelvic dissemination of OCS. The patient underwent comprehensive surgical staging procedures, including total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, supracolic omentectomy and selective para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Histologically the ovarian carcinosarcoma was composed of an epithelial component (high-grade serous adenocarcinoma) and three sarcomatous components (homologous-endometrial stromal cell sarcoma, and heterologous-chondrosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma). Immunohistochemistry staining was performed. A postoperative complication (adhesion between the abdominal aorta and terminal ileum causing obstructive ileus) that has never been reported in the medical literature occurred. Conclusion. Carcinosarcomas are carcinomas with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and heterologous differentiation. Retroperitoneal pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes should be carefully inspected in patients with ovarian tumours. Adhesions between the small bowels and abdominal aorta are possible complications after lymph node dissection in the paraaortic region.

Controversies in preoperative bowel preparation in gynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgery: a review of the literature

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to assess the impact of mechanical and oral antibiotics bowel preparation on surgical performance and to investigate their role before gynecologic surgical procedures regarding the infection rates. We also aim to study the updated evidence regarding the use of these different types of bowel preparation, as well as the current preoperative practice applied.

METHODS

An extensive search of the literature was conducted with Medline/PubMed, and the Cochrane Library Database of Systematic Reviews being used for our primary search.

RESULTS

To date, due to the conflicting guidelines by the scientific societies, surgeons do not use a specific pattern of bowel preparation regimen. There are no strong evidence supporting mechanical bowel preparation, but instead, in many cases, patients' adverse effects, both physiological and psychological have been noted. On the other hand, the combined use of oral antibiotic and mechanical bowel preparation has been proven beneficial in colorectal surgery in reducing postoperative morbidities.

CONCLUSION

Based on current literature, in gynecologic surgeries with minimal probability of intraluminal entry, a regimen without any bowel preparation should be applied. The combined administration of both mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation, or even the use of the oral antibiotics alone, should be preserved for cases of increased complexity, where bowel involvement is highly anticipated, such as in gynecologic oncology, as stated in the ERAS protocols. Nonetheless, further research specific to gynecologic surgery is required.