New genetic causes of pheochromocytoma: current concepts and the clinical relevance

Genetic screening in arterial hypertension

Studies involving adoptive families and twins have demonstrated the genetic basis of hypertension and shown that genetic factors account for about 40% of the variance in blood pressure among individuals. Arterial hypertension is genetically complex: multiple genes influence the blood pressure phenotype through allelic effects from single genes and gene-gene interactions. Moreover, environmental factors also modify the blood pressure phenotype. This complexity explains why the identification of the underlying genes has not been as successful in hypertension as in other diseases (such as type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus). The identification of the genetic determinants of hypertension has been most successful in endocrine forms of hypertension, which have well-defined phenotypes that permit a precise patient stratification into homogeneous cohorts. A promising area for the application of genetic testing to personalized medicine is the prediction of responses and adverse reactions to antihypertensive drugs. The identification of genetic markers of drug response will enable the design of randomized controlled trials in much smaller series of patients than is currently possible, decreasing the costs and times from drug design to clinical use and ultimately providing patients and doctors with a larger number of tools to combat hypertension, the most important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. This Review focuses on the rapidly developing field of genetic testing in patients with arterial hypertension.

Candidate genes associated with malignant pheochromocytomas by genome-wide expression profiling

OBJECTIVE

To improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in malignant pheochromocytoma by examining differences in the gene expression profile between benign and malignant tumors.

BACKGROUND

The molecular events involved in the malignant transformation of pheochromocytoma are poorly understood. There are also no reliable and uniformly accepted histopathologic criteria to distinguish benign from malignant pheochromocytoma.

METHODS

We performed genome-wide expression profiling of 58 pheochromocytomas (29 benign and sporadic, 16 benign and hereditary, 13 malignant) with technical and biologic replication.

RESULTS

Unsupervised cluster analysis showed 3 main clusters of tumors that did not have complete concordance with the clinical and pathologic groupings of pheochromocytomas. Supervised cluster analysis showed almost completely separate clustering between benign and malignant tumors. The differentially expressed genes with known function belonged to 8 biologic process categories; signal transduction, transcription, protein transport, protein synthesis, smooth muscle contraction, ion transport, chemotaxis, and electron transport. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed significant correlation between the microarray profiles of malignant pheochromocytomas and several known molecular pathways associated with carcinogenesis and dedifferentiation. Ten differentially expressed genes had high diagnostic accuracy, and 5 of these genes (CFC1, FAM62B, HOMER1, LRRN3, TBX3, ADAMTS) in combination had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.96 for distinguishing benign versus malignant tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Differentially expressed genes between benign and malignant pheochromocytomas distinguish between these tumors with high diagnostic accuracy. Our findings provide new insight into the genes and molecular pathways that may be involved in malignant pheochromocytomas.

Novel SDHD germ-line mutations in pheochromocytoma patients

BACKGROUND

SDHD germ-line mutations predispose to pheochromocytoma (PCC) and paraganglioma (PGL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The incidence and types of SDHD germ-line mutations are determined in 70 patients with apparently sporadic adrenal and extra-adrenal PCC.

RESULTS

SDHD sequence variants were identified in the germ line of five patients. Two of three novel mutations were in exon 1 and one in exon 3. One patient had a codon 1 missense mutation (M1K) and a concurrent 3-bp deletion in intron 1. Three of 10 family members had only the exon 1 mutation, whereas one had only the intron 1 mutation. The other exon 1 mutation resulted from a deletion of nucleotides 28-33 with a 12-bp in-frame insertion (c.28_33 del ins TAGGAGGCCCTA). This mutation generated a premature stop codon after codon 9 and was also present in the brother who had a bilateral PCC. The third patient with a carotid body tumour, with an abdominal and a thoracic PGL had a 12-bp deletion in exon 3 (codons 91-94, c.271_282 del). Her father carried the same mutation and had bilateral carotid body tumours. Two further patients, one with six PGL, carried a previously described H50R polymorphism, whose disease-specific relevance is currently unclear. The three patients with bona fide SDHD mutations were younger than those without germ-line mutations.

CONCLUSION

SDHD germ-line mutations are rare in patients with PCC, but their identification is an important prerequisite for the clinical care and appropriate management of affected individuals and their families.

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in children: a review of medical and surgical management at a tertiary care center

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review our institutional experience managing pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas in children.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of the Mayo Clinic database from 1975 to 2005 identified 30 patients < 18 years of age with histologically confirmed pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma.

RESULTS

There were 12 patients with pheochromocytomas and 18 with paragangliomas. The most common presenting symptoms were hypertension (64%), palpitation (53%), headache (47%), and mass-related effects (30%). Nine patients (30%) had a genetic mutation or documented family history of pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. Fourteen patients (47%) had malignant disease, whereas 16 (53%) had benign disease. Logistic analysis showed that statistically significant risk factors for malignancy were (1) paraganglioma, (2) apparently sporadic, as opposed to familial, pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma, and (3) tumor size of > 6 cm. Surgical resection was performed for 28 patients (93%), with perioperative mortality and major morbidity rates of 0% and 10%, respectively. Resection achieved symptomatic relief for 25 patients (83%). All patients with benign disease appeared cured after resection. For patients with malignant disease, the 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 78% and 31%, respectively, and the mean survival time was 157 +/- 32 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of malignant pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma was high in children (47%), particularly those with apparently sporadic disease, paraganglioma, and tumor diameters of > 6 cm. Patients with a known genetic mutation or familial pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma were more likely to achieve resection with negative microscopic margins and had improved disease-specific mortality rates. Surgical resection remains the treatment of choice for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.