Unveiling Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Fractures and Related Complications in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Concise Review

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have become popular over tunneled catheters in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) due to their ease of use and convenience. Although rare, a PICC fracture can be a severe and potentially fatal complication. This narrative review aims to identify factors predisposing neonates to PICC fracture and related complications, such as catheter jamming, and explore strategies for preventing and detecting this complication. A thorough search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted using relevant keywords to identify articles discussing PICC fracture in neonates. The review encompassed English-language literature on PICC fracture in neonates, with additional pertinent publications identified through citation searching. The incidence of PICC fracture in neonates varies from less than 1% to 10%, with a higher risk associated with prolonged catheterization, lower gestational age and lower birth weight, and the use of multi-lumen catheters. PICC fractures can occur during insertion, maintenance, or removal. Factors such as catheter duration, gestational age, birth weight, and catheter type increase the risk of PICC fracture. Excessive syringe pressure, securement failure, and excessive force during removal are contributing factors. Catheter fatigue and thin-walled catheter design are common causes of breakage. Preventive measures include proper training of healthcare providers, regular monitoring, early recognition, and prompt catheter removal upon fracture. Preventing and detecting PICC fractures is crucial for neonatal safety. Vigilance during insertion, maintenance, and removal, along with care to avoid excessive force during removal and high pressure during flushing, can help prevent catheter breakage. More research is required to improve prevention strategies for PICC fractures in neonates.

Peripherally inserted central cathether migration in neonates: Incidence, timing and risk factors

BACKGROUND

PICC line use is a common practice in neonatal units, but it is associated with various complications. Catheter migration is the most common complication in neonates. Periodic imaging is recommended to monitor the tip position of the PICCs, but the optimal frequency is undetermined. The incidence, timing and risk factors that are associated with PICC migration have not been fully investigated beyond 24 hrs in neonates. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence, timing and risk factors that are associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) migration in neonates.

METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective study of 168 PICCs placed in 141 neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between 2015 and 2016. The incidence of catheter migration was determined radiographically at 12-24 hrs and every third day after insertion until it was removed.

RESULTS

Overall incidence of PICC migration was 28%and most commonly was detected within the first three days after PICC placement (83%). The incidence of PICC migration was higher in males. The PICC migration was associated with difficulty advancing the PICC at the time of insertion and PICC dressing change.

CONCLUSION

Serial evaluation of PICC placement in neonates is required to maintain proper position. Based on our experience in our unit, we recommend periodic imaging at 12-24 hrs and on the third day after PICC placement as most migration occurred within three days after insertion.

Fabrication and characterization of medical grade polyurethane composite catheters for near-infrared imaging

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are hollow polymeric tubes that transport nutrients, blood and medications to neonates. To determine proper PICC placement, frequent X-ray imaging of neonates is performed. Because X-rays pose severe health risks to neonates, safer alternatives are needed. We hypothesize that near infrared (NIR) polymer composites can be fabricated into catheters by incorporating a fluorescent dye (IRDye 800CW) and visualized using NIR imaging. To fabricate catheters, polymer and dye are dry mixed and pressed, sectioned, and extruded to produce hollow tubes. We analyzed surface roughness, stiffness, dye retention, NIR contrast intensity, and biocompatibility. The extrusion process did not significantly alter the mechanical properties of the polymer composites. Over a period of 23 days, only 6.35 ± 5.08% dye leached out of catheters. The addition of 0.025 wt% dye resulted in a 14-fold contrast enhancement producing clear PICC images at 1 cm under a tissue equivalent. The addition of IRDye 800CW did not alter the biocompatibility of the polymer and did not increase adhesion of cells to the surface. We successfully demonstrated that catheters can be imaged without the use of harmful radiation and still maintain the same properties as the unaltered medical grade equivalent.

Securing PICC lines

Ms. Shirland raises a valid concern regarding safe securement of the neonatal PICC catheter and its role in preventing catheter fracture and catheter embolism. Ms. Paulson and Ms. Miller’s response is appreciated [see the author’s response in Neonatal Network, November/December 2008, p. 427]. In Dislodgement Rates and Impact of Securement Methods for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) in Children, Frey and Schears report methods of PICC securement include transparent dressings, skin closure strips, sutures, and catheter-specific securement devices.1 However, a specific procedure for the appropriate placement of the skin closure strips is not delineated. In PICC Complications in Neonates and Children, Frey describes catheter fracture, where the damage was caused by a “sterile-tape thread” in a skin closure strip.2 Given the extended dwell time expected with PICC catheters, placement of skin closure strips including sterile tape fibers directly overlying the catheter would, in combination with infant mobility, support the possibility of external forces (fibers, adhesive agent, activity) causing severance of the catheter over time, which cannot be discounted. In cases of catheter embolism, catheter fragments required cardiac catheterization for retrieval.2

Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters: recommendations for prevention of insertion and postinsertion complications

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) continue to be necessary in neonatal care. They benefit many premature infants and those needing long-term intravenous access. An experienced inserter, early recognition of PICC candidates, early PICC placement, knowledge of anatomy, and correct choice of vein all increase placement success. As with any invasive procedure, there are risks. These include pain, difficulty advancing the catheter, damage to vessels, catheter malposition, and bleeding. Utilizing assessment skills, following the product manufacturer's instructions, and carefully placing the catheter should minimize most of these risks. Additional risks include postinsertion complications such as occlusions, thrombosis, catheter failure, infection, and catheter malposition. Proper nursing care--which includes controlling infection, properly securing the catheter, and changing the dressing as needed--is key to preventing complications and maintaining the PICC until treatment has been completed.

Assessing Pediatric Patients for Vascular Access and Sedation

Central venous catheters have been established as a reliable source of vascular access since the 1970s. Peripherally inserted central catheters became a popular central catheter in the early 1990s for adults and children. The management of vascular access in children is an essential part of inpatient and outpatient care. Assessing and inserting the appropriate catheter for the pediatric patient is just a part of the component for central catheter care. Care providers also need to assess these children for sedation or distraction for the procedure. This article discusses factors for catheter choice and points for assessing children for sedation or distraction for vascular access insertion.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Children

There is little published information describing standards of practice in the placement, use, and maintenance of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) devices in children. A Web-based survey tool was designed to query these issues, and 72 intravenous therapy nurses from 72 hospitals provided complete responses to the survey. The respondents were predominantly (81%) from healthcare organizations inserting 40 or fewer PICC devices per month. These hospitals were equally divided in using 0.9% sodium chloride (USP) (saline) or heparinized saline flush to maintain patency, whereas 76% used catheters for blood sampling. Flushing and blood sampling practices were not related to catheter occlusion rates. From their survey, the authors conclude that the standards of practice for 3-Fr PICC devices, the most commonly used for children, are quite variable and in need of standardization for this specific population.

The efficacy and safety of blood sampling through peripherally inserted central catheter devices in children

BACKGROUND

The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) is commonly used in children for medication and fluid administration. In addition, PICCs are used occasionally for blood sampling as an alternative to venipuncture. Blood sampling from these catheters carries the hypothetical risk of catheter occlusion caused by blood remaining in the catheter, and this practice is not supported by PICC manufacturers. Children often undergo multiple needle punctures, which are associated with pain, anxiety, and dissatisfaction with care. The authors hypothesized that blood sampling through 3-Fr PICC devices is effective and safe for children.

METHODS

After placement of a 3-Fr PICC, all the children were sequentially enrolled in one of two groups. The control group included patients that had 3-Fr PICC devices without blood sampling. The blood sampling group included patients with 3-Fr PICC devices through which blood samples were obtained. Demographic data, PICC placement and sampling data, infusate composition, catheter occlusion, mechanical complications, and blood stream infections were recorded. The primary outcome variable was the difference in occlusion rates between the two groups.

RESULTS

The analysis included 204 children with 3-Fr PICCs (120 in the blood sampling group and 84 in the control group) who had a mean age, 117.7 +/- 4.9 months. The mean PICC duration was 15.6 +/- 1.0 days. Blood sampling was successful more than 98% of the time from all blood sampling group catheters, with a mean of 4.4 +/- 0.5 samples removed from each catheter. There was a higher occlusion rate in the blood sampling group. However, this result did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of infection or mechanical complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood sampling is feasible and effective through 3-Fr PICC devices in children. This practice is not associated with a significant increase in occlusion, infection, or mechanical complication rates.

Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: Part 2. Detecting less frequently occurring complications

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are frequently placed in neonates to optimize nutrition and provide stable infusions of critical medications into the central vascular system. PICCs have been associated with a number of device-specific complications that can manifest during insertion, while the line is indwelling, and/or after the removal of the line. The first article of this series in Focus on the Physical, titled "Assessment of Infants With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Part I. Detecting the Most Frequently Occurring Complications," presented assessment strategies to detect common complications such as catheter occlusions and catheter-related bloodstream infections. Part 2 of this series emphasizes the importance of ongoing systematic assessment of PICCs for device-specific complications such as catheter migration, dislodgement, breakage, phlebitis, and thrombosis, as well as the life-threatening complications of pleural and pericardial effusion and tamponade. Each complication is described, along with a review of the etiology, a description of presenting signs and symptoms, and key clinical interventions.

Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters: complication rates related to catheter tip location

OBJECTIVE

To compare complication rates between central venous catheter tip location and noncentral tip location after peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in children.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 1998, data from all children who underwent PICC placement were analyzed. Patient demographics, catheter characteristics, catheter duration, infusate composition, and catheter complications were entered prospectively into a computerized database. Catheter tip locations were determined by fluoroscopy and were defined as central if they resided in the superior vena cava, right atrium, or high inferior vena cava at or above the level of the diaphragm, and as noncentral if located elsewhere. Differences in complication rates between the central and noncentral groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 1266 PICCs were analyzed from 1053 patients with a mean age of 6.49 +/-.2 years (range: 0-45.0 years). Of the 1266 PICCs, 1096 (87%) were central in tip location, and 170 (13%) were noncentral in tip location. The central group had 42 complications of 1096 catheters (3.8%), while the noncentral group had 49 complications of 170 catheters (28.8%). Controlling for patient age, catheter size, gender, and catheter duration with a logistic regression model, there remained a statistically significant increased likelihood of complication in the noncentral group versus the central group (adjusted odds ratio: 8.28; 95% confidence interval: 5.11-13.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Centrally placed catheter tips are associated with fewer complications than are noncentrally placed catheter tips. Clinicians should ensure that catheter tips reside centrally after PICC placement in infants and children.