Medication adherence and its possible associated factors in patients with acne vulgaris: A cross-sectional study of 200 patients in Iran

There are several etiologic factors involved in the pathogenesis of acne vulgaris. Therefore, current treatment guidelines recommend applying different classes of medications for it. This makes medication adherence a challenging issue in acne patients. The current study was designed to assess medication adherence and its possible associated factors in patients with acne vulgaris. This study was performed on patients with acne vulgaris in two dermatology clinics of Imam Khomeini Hospital and Razi Hospital. A validated questionnaire (ECOB, Elaboration d'un outil d'evaluation de l'observance des traitements medicamenteux) was applied to evaluate adherence to topical and oral therapies. We assessed relationship between patients' medication adherence and their sociodemographic, medication, and medical histories. A total of 200 patients, 136 females (68%), and 64 males (32%), with a mean age of 22 years were entered into the study. Overall, only 30 out of 200 patients (15%) were adherent to their treatments. Based on the bivariate analyses, food exacerbations, and severity of the disease by the patient's opinion was significantly associated with overall medication adherence (P = .03). Moreover, patients who were more adherent to topical treatment were more adherent to systemic treatment, as well (P = .007). The current study showed that treatment adherence was very low among patients with acne vulgaris. It is recommended to educate patients on the proper use of anti-acne medications. Besides, it is highly recommended that physicians and pharmacists use ECOB questionnaire regularly to guide patients accurately with the use of their drug regimens.

Dermatology nurses view on factors related to Danish psoriasis patients' adherence to topical drugs: a focus group study

BACKGROUND

Topical medications are first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate psoriasis, but adherence is low, which negatively affects patients' outcomes and quality of life. Nurses can play a central role in patient care, particularly in improving adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the experience of dermatology nurses with psoriasis patients' adherence to topical drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a semi-structured focus group study with 6 dermatology nurses and 2 dermatology nursing students. Participants were recruited from a dermatology hospital outpatient clinic. Data were analyzed by a systematic text condensation method with a phenomenological-hermeneutic approach.

RESULTS

Nurses experienced that factors such as social inequality, patient-centered nursing, and patients' quality of life can have an influence on adherence.

CONCLUSION

Optimal adherence to topical treatments is a complex exercise and is influenced by many different factors. Involving nurses when prescribing topical treatments may be beneficial since they are one of the most trustworthy professions and have a holistic view on psoriasis severity, patient preferences, health care resources available and socioeconomic factors.

Topical treatment of acne vulgaris: efficiency, side effects, and adherence rate

Objective

Adherence is a problem in the topical treatment of acne. This study was designed to evaluate the efficiency of current topical treatment and adherence in patients.

Methods

Patients with acne vulgaris who had recently been prescribed a topical therapy were selected. A dermatologist-directed questionnaire was completed. Demographic data, acne severity, treatment and the manner of use, side effects, and reason for discontinuation were recorded.

Results

A total 250 patients were included, 178 female (71.2%) and 72 male (28.8%) participants, mean age was 18.6 ± 2.8 years. Of 250 patients, 114 (45.6%) had given up therapy for two reasons: unresponsiveness in 71 (62.3%) and side effects in 43 (37.7%) patients. For antibacterial treatments, the rate of unresponsiveness was higher but the rate of side effects was lower. Discontinuation owing to unresponsiveness was higher in patients with severe acne. Side effects were higher in patients with comedonal-type acne. The lowest rates of side effects and discontinuation were among every-other-night users.

Conclusion

In this study, patients with acne gave up treatment owing to side effects and unresponsiveness, which reduced the treatment efficiency.

Factors affecting adherence and patient satisfaction with treatment: a cross-sectional study of 500 patients with acne vulgaris

Background: Acne Vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory disease that requires long-term treatment. Adherence to treatment is a problem in chronic diseases and may affect treatment outcomes.Objective: We aim to investigate treatment adherence and satisfaction of patients with acne and identify independent factors that affect them.Methods: Five hundred patients with acne were included in this cross-sectional study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Severity of acne was assessed using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scale, and a five-point Likert scale was used to assess patients' satisfaction and adherence.Results: Adherence to treatment was poor in 64.4% of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that using oral isotretinoin (OR: 4.1, 95% CI 2.44-6.92, p < .001) and satisfaction with treatment (OR: 2.1, 95% CI 1.31-3.43, p = .002) were independent factors that affect adherence in patients. 51.8% of the patients were satisfied with their treatments and treatment satisfaction was higher in females (OR: 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.8, p = .004) and patients using oral isotretinoin (OR: 14.8, 95% CI 9.4-23.2, p < .001).Conclusions: Treatment adherence is poor among patients with acne. Identifying the factor that affects adherence may help the dermatologist recognize non-adherent patients and develop strategies to improve adherence.

Use of Supplementary Patient Education Material Increases Treatment Adherence and Satisfaction Among Acne Patients Receiving Adapalene 0.1%/Benzoyl Peroxide 2.5% Gel in Primary Care Clinics: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study

INTRODUCTION

Poor adherence to acne treatment may lead to unnecessary treatments, increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life (QoL). This multicenter study evaluated the effect of supplementary patient education material (SEM) (a short video, information card, and additional information available online) on treatment adherence and satisfaction among acne patients treated with the fixed-dose combination adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel (A/BPO) in primary care clinics versus (1) standard-of-care patient education (SOCPE) (package insert and oral instruction) and (2) SOCPE plus more frequent clinic visits.

METHODS

Subjects with acne were randomized to receive once-daily A/BPO for 12 weeks plus (1) SEM in addition to SOCPE; (2) SOCPE only with two additional visits; or (3) SOCPE only. Other assessments included a subject appreciation questionnaire, a physician questionnaire, and safety.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven subjects were enrolled. At baseline, most (87.6%) had mild to moderate acne. Better adherence was observed in the A/BPO + SEM group compared with A/BPO + more visits or A/BPO alone [mean 63.1%, 48.2% (p = 0.0206), and 56.5%, respectively]. The A/BPO + SEM group had more subjects with greater than 75% adherence (45%, 30.4%, and 25%, respectively). According to the subject appreciation questionnaire, the SEM was more helpful to adhere to treatment (56.7%) versus more visits (32.3%) and A/BPO alone (15.2%), better use the product (70%, 61.3%, and 54.5%, respectively), and better manage skin irritation (53.3%, 48.4%, and 36.4%, respectively). All physicians were satisfied with the SEM and 90% would consider using it in their practice. Safety assessment showed fewer treatment-related adverse events in the A/BPO + SEM group.

CONCLUSION

Use of the SEM may increase adherence of acne patients treated with once-daily A/BPO gel in primary care, consequently improving treatment and QoL in the long term.

FUNDING

Nestle Skin Health-Galderma R&D.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02307266.

Quality of life measurement in acne. Position Paper of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Acne causes profound negative psychological and social effects on the quality of life (QoL) of patients. The European Dermatology Forum S3-Guideline for the Treatment of Acne recommended adopting a QoL measure as an integral part of acne management. Because of constantly growing interest in health-related QoL assessment in acne and because of the high impact of acne on patients' lives, the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force on QoL and Patient Oriented Outcomes and the Task Force on Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa have documented the QoL instruments that have been used in acne patients, with information on validation, purposes of their usage, description of common limitations and mistakes in their usage and overall recommendations.

Acne and quality of life - impact and management

Acne is a common skin disease with a high prevalence in adolescents and young adults. In addition to physical effects such as permanent scarring and disfigurement, acne has long-lasting psychosocial effects that affect the patient's quality of life. Depression, social isolation and suicidal ideation are frequent comorbidities of acne that should not be neglected in the therapy of acne patients. Research evidence suggests that the impairment of quality of life can be alleviated by appropriate topical acne treatment.

A Consensus on Acne Management Focused on Specific Patient Features

Background:

Most treatment guidelines for acne are based on clinical severity. Our objective was to expand that approach to one that also comprised individualized patient features: a case-based approach.

Methods:

An expert panel of Canadian dermatologists was established to develop demographic and clinical features considered to be particularly important in acne treatment selection. A nominal group consensus process was used for inclusion of features and corresponding appropriate treatments.

Results:

Consensus was achieved on the following statements: follicular epithelial dysfunction contributes to acne pathogenesis; inflammation from underlying disease(s) or prior treatment may impact further patient management; management focusing on specific patient features and on addressing psychosocial factors, including impact on quality of life, may improve treatment adherence and outcomes; and case-based scenarios are a practical approach to illustrate the effect of these factors. To address the latter, eight case profiles were developed.

Conclusions:

Management of acne should be based on multifactorial considerations beyond clinically determined acne severity and should include patient-reported impact, gender, skin sensitivity (including preexisting dermatoses), and phototype.

Acne subject preference for pump over tube for dispensing fixed-dose combination adapalene 0.1%-benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel

Introduction

Acne is a chronic inflammatory disease. Key to a patient’s success on fixed-dose adapalene–benzoyl peroxide (BPO) gel is ensuring adherence. Use of a pump system to deliver a pre-measured amount of gel with each pressure enables application of a more consistent dose vs. the tube, which should improve adherence. In the present study, we evaluate patient preference for two different containers for dispensing adapalene–BPO gel.

Methods

In this 15-day, open-label study, 300 subjects were asked to treat their acne using fixed-dose adapalene 0.1%–BPO 2.5% gel dispensed in either a tube or a pump once-daily for up to 7 days. At week 1, subjects switched to the alternative packaging design for the same timeframe. At the end of the treatment period, subjects were asked to complete a subject preference survey.

Results

Among subjects completing the survey (n = 291), 79.0% (n = 230) preferred the pump for dispensing adapalene–BPO gel and 21.0% (n = 61) preferred the tube (p < 0.001). The top three characteristics of the pump were that it was easy to use (89.0%; n = 259/291), clean (73.2%; n = 213/291) and convenient (69.4%; n = 202/291). When asked to rate their experience with using the pump, 91.8% (n = 267/291; p < 0.001) of subjects reported being satisfied on a self-assessment scale. The majority of subjects stated they would tell their doctor about their preference for the pump next time adapalene–BPO gel was prescribed (76.6%; n = 223/291; p < 0.001) and would prefer the pump if both containers cost the same amount (80.1%; n = 233/291; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patients prefer using a pump instead of a tube to dispense adapalene–BPO gel. This delivery mechanism helps to ensure consistent application and thus may improve patient adherence to the prescribed acne treatment regimen.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13555-014-0054-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Medical adherence to acne therapy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence of acne patients to treatment may equate to poor clinical efficacy, increased healthcare costs, and unnecessary treatments. Authors have investigated risk factors for poor medical adherence and how to improve this difficult problem in the context of acne.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to describe what methods have been used to measure adherence, what is known about acne patients' adherence to treatment, and the factors affecting adherence.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed for randomized controlled trials published between 1978 and June 2013, focusing on patient adherence to prescribed acne medications. A test for equality of proportions was performed on studies of similar design to collectively analyze adherence to oral versus topical medication. The self-reported adherence data collected from these clinical trials were then compared with adherence data from a pharmacy database study.

RESULTS

Studies varied in modalities of data collection, but the majority utilized subjective methods. Topical therapies were more often studied than oral. The overall oral adherence rate, as calculated by a test of equality of proportions, was 76.3%, while the overall topical adherence rate was 75.8% (p=0.927). The occurrence of side effects and young age were cited as the top reasons for poor adherence, followed by forgetfulness.

LIMITATIONS

The MEDLINE search resulted in a limited sample of adherence studies. In addition, there is currently no standardized or fully validated method of measurement, allowing for variability in what was considered 'adherent'. Lastly, data collected via subjective methods cannot guarantee reliable results.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the values reflected a population adherent to both topical and oral medications, with no significant difference in adherence between the two. However, the methodologies used by many of the studies were weak, and the findings are not consistent with results of more objective measures of adherence. The leading factors that contribute to poor adherence may be reduced with enhanced patient consultation, reminder systems, and education.

Acne management in Japan: study of patient adherence

Obtaining good adherence to acne therapy is a challenge for all dermatologists. We studied 428 acne patients in Japan to determine the likelihood of good adherence and factors associated with medication-taking. This study utilized a simple validated questionnaire to assess risk of poor adherence; information about patient and treatment characteristics was also collected. There was an overall rate of poor adherence in 76% of subjects. Adherence to topical medication was poor in 52% of those treated with a topical agent only (n = 123). Among those taking combination therapies (n = 275), adherence to the topical portion of therapy was poor in 49% of subjects. The likelihood of poor adherence to oral medication was higher, both when administered alone (n = 30, 93% poor adherence) and when given as part of a combination regimen (n = 275, 86%). Factors with an impact on adherence included satisfaction with treatment (p = 0.023) and the experience of side effects (p = 0.027). Patients who felt they had a good understanding of acne and its treatment were more likely to have good adherence. These data suggest that there is significant room for improvement in acne adherence in Japan, as in other areas of the world, and that improved education may enhance adherence.