Risk factors for abutment and implant fracture after loading

Characteristics and Risk Factors for the Fracture of One-Piece Implants

Objective

The one-piece dental implant was originally designed to overcome the structural weaknesses of the two-piece implant. However, a fractured one-piece implant requires removal because the abutment cannot be repaired or replaced to support new prosthetic restorations. The aim of this study was to clarify the features and risk factors for fracture of the one-piece implant.

Methods

This study was designed as a retrospective case series research. The subjects were patients who were treated for fractures of the one-piece implant at a clinic in Japan between 2012 and 2021. Fractures of the one-piece implant were diagnosed by cone-beam computed tomography, and the association between age and duration from implant placement to fracture was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test.

Results

Eighteen patients and 20 one-piece implants (under 39 years: 5 patients and 6 implants; 40-59 years: 7 patients and 7 implants; over 60 years: 6 patients and 7 implants) had fractures in their one-piece implants. Of the fractured implants, 11 had a diameter of 3 mm, and 9 had a diameter of 4 mm. The mean durations up to implant fracture were 662 days in the younger group, 1467 days in the middle group, and 1239 days in older group, and the duration was significantly shorter in the younger group. In addition, 83.3% of fracture implants in the younger group were in the molar region. All fractures of the one-piece implants occurred under the bone margin. Two patients had torus mandibularis, and 1 patient was had bruxism.

Conclusions

One-piece implants in younger patients that are located in the lower molar position are the most susceptible to implant fracture, and the fracture occurred under the bone margin in all cases.

Cementum is key to periodontal tissue regeneration: A review on apatite microstructures for creation of novel cementum-based dental implants

The cementum is the outermost layer of hard tissue covering the dentin within the root portion of the teeth. It is the only hard tissue with a specialized structure and function that forms a part of both the teeth and periodontal tissue. As such, cementum is believed to be critical for periodontal tissue regeneration. In this review, we discuss the function and histological structure of the cementum to promote crystal engineering with a biochemical approach in cementum regenerative medicine. We review the microstructure of enamel and bone while discussing the mechanism underlying apatite crystal formation to infer the morphology of cementum apatite crystals and their complex structure with collagen fibers. Finally, the limitations of the current dental implant treatments in clinical practice are explored from the perspective of periodontal tissue regeneration. We anticipate the possibility of advancing periodontal tissue regenerative medicine via cementum regeneration using a combination of material science and biochemical methods.

Survival rates, patient satisfaction, and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: a 12-month prospective study

PURPOSE

To determine the survival rate, incidence of prosthetic complications, and patient satisfaction of implant fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) after a mean observation period of 1.4 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight (28) eligible participants were recruited according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The definitive metal-acrylic resin IFCDPs consisted of titanium bars veneered with acrylic resin and acrylic denture teeth. Prosthodontic complications, divided into major and minor, were monitored. Parameters such as gender, jaw location, bruxism, and occlusal scheme were evaluated. Moreover, a questionnaire was administered throughout the study to assess patient satisfaction. Poisson regression as well as repeated measures ANOVA were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen (14) males and 14 females were enrolled and followed-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. All IFCDPs survived (100% survival rate). The most frequent minor complication was the loss of material used to close the screw access hole (20% out of total complications). The most frequent major complication was chipping of the acrylic denture teeth (77.14% out of total complications). Gender (p = 0.008) and bruxism (p = 0.030) were significant predictors for the total major complications (major wear and major chipping) while occlusal scheme was a significant predictor for major chipping events (p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

While IFCDPs demonstrated high prosthetic survival rates, they also exhibited a high number of chipping events of the acrylic veneering material, especially in males, bruxers, and individuals with canine guidance occlusion. However, the occurrence of these prosthetic complications did not negatively affect patient satisfaction.

Abutment mechanical complications of a Morse taper connection implant system: A 1- to 9-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The fracture of a Morse tapered abutment connection in an osseointegrated implant is one of the most serious mechanical complications, and it is extremely hard to deal with this complication in clinical practice.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to explore the cumulative mechanical complications focus on abutment of a platform switching Morse taper connection implant system after loading, and to perform a retrospective, approximately 1- to 9-year follow-up study to identify the predisposing factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 495 patients with 945 fitted implants were enrolled in this study with a follow-up from January 2012 to January 2020. The data of mechanical complications of the abutment, including abutment fracture (AF) and abutment screw loosening (ASL), and possible causative factors were extracted and evaluated statistically.

RESULTS

A total of 25 out of 945 (2.65%) cumulative abutment mechanical complications occurred. AF was the most common complication (n = 13, 1.38%), followed by ASL (n = 12, 1.27%). For AF, gender, type of prosthesis, abutment design, and implant diameter were identified as the causative factors. AF was mostly observed in the single crown of males in molar areas, while ASL was more likely to occur on an angled abutment than on a non-angled abutment. Moreover, the abutment with the positioning index (/X) had a higher incidence of fracture than the abutment without the positioning index (C/).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the Morse taper connection is a safe abutment connection. AF occurs more frequently within single crowns in molar area of males, especially with the positioning index (/X), while ASL is more likely to occur in an angled abutment.

Current complications and issues of implant superstructure

The purpose of this review is to search for complications of dental implant superstructures and consider the issues involved. This narrative review was performed by searching through PubMed databases and review articles that were published after 1990. Misfitting of the superstructure can result in loosening of screws, reduced preload, and in some cases, significant stress around the implant. External connection modalities and single implant prostheses have been reported to have more loose or broken abutment screws. In addition, when zirconia abutment was used for platform shifting, the rate of fracture of the abutment was considered to be high. Additionally, it was reported that men were significantly at an increased risk of abutment fracture. As for the retention mechanism of implant overdenture, stud attachment (Locator type) should receive more attention to wear and damage of retention parts than other attachments. The causes of the complications of implant superstructures have not been clarified in some cases, and further verification is required. Verification of complications is considered important to obtain a long-term prognosis for superstructures of implants. It will be necessary to further verify complications of implants in the future.

A retrospective study of 12,538 internal conical connection implants: focused on the long-term integrity of implant-abutment complexes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term integrity of implant-abutment complexes in implant systems with two internal conical angles.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

12,538 bone-level implants of two systems placed between January 2012 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Cumulative abutment/implant fracture rates in systems with larger (LA, 7.5°) and smaller (SA, 5.7°) internal conical angles were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared between groups. The association between implant systems and jammed abutment retrievability was evaluated by multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression modelling.

RESULTS

For LA, the 8-year cumulative incident rate was 0.10% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0-0.24%) for implant fracture and 0.26% (95% CI: 0.11%-0.41%) for abutment fracture, demonstrating a significant difference in gender (p = 0.03), implant diameter (p = 0.01), jaw (p = 0.006) and antagonist tooth (p < 0.001). For SA, the 8-year cumulative incident rate was 0.38% (95% CI: 0-0.79%) for implant fracture and 2.62% (95% CI: 0.05%-5.13%) for abutment fracture, which was influenced by implant diameter (p < 0.001) and site (p = 0.03). The cumulative implant/abutment fracture rate was lower for LA implants, particularly for LA implant-supported single crowns (SCs) (p < 0.05). The abutment-retrieval success rate was 92.8% for LA, and 57.1% for SA (p = 0.055).

CONCLUSION

LA implants exhibited a lower incidence of fracture in abutment-implant complexes and a relatively higher retrievability success rate for jammed abutments.

Survival Rates of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses Supported by Short Dental Implants (≤8.5 mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the implant survival rates, marginal bone loss, and mechanical complications of prostheses supported by splinted and nonsplinted short implants (≤8.5 mm).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic database (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and EMBASE) and manual searches up to May 2021 were conducted to identify studies comparing splinted and nonsplinted short implants (≤8.5 mm). The primary outcome was implant survival rate. Secondary outcomes were marginal bone loss and mechanical complications. The quality of included studies and risk-of-bias were assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and featured 1506 short implants (596 nonsplinted and 910 splinted) with a follow-up time ranging from 1 to 16 years. Quantitative analysis found no statistically significant differences between splinted and nonsplinted short implants (≤8.5 mm) for survival rate (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.96, 1.01; p = 0.26)) and marginal bone loss (SMD = -0.08; 95% CI - 0.23, 0.07; p = 0.28). Veneer chipping, abutment screw breakage, screw loosening, and loss of retention were reported in the selected studies as common complications. However, no statistically significant difference was found between splinted and nonsplinted short implants (RR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.20, 1.54; p = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the present meta-analysis, it might be concluded that splinted short implants (≤8.5 mm) do not present superior performance in survival rate, marginal bone maintenance and prevention of mechanical complications compared with single-unit prostheses.